Ordinary Meeting of Council
TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 7 February 2012 AT 7.00pm
Level 3 Council Chambers
Agenda
** ** ** ** ** **
NOTE: For Full Details, See Council’s Website –
www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting
Address the Council
NOTE: Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.
Documents Circulated to Councillors
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council 7
File: S02131
Meeting held 13 December 2011
Minutes numbered 422 to 451
minutes from the Mayor
Petitions
GENERAL BUSINESS
i. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.
ii. The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.
GB.1 Australian Local Government Women's Association (NSW) 59th Annual Conference March 2012 96
File: S02046
To advise Councillors of the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (NSW) Annual Conference to be held in Dubbo on 22-24 March 2012.
Recommendation:
That any Councillors interested in attending the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (NSW) Annual Conference in Dubbo on 22-24 March 2012 advise the General Manager by Friday 10 February 2012.
GB.2 Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) Tourism Conference 2012 111
File: S02046
To advise Council of the Local Government and Shires Association of NSW (LGSA) 2012 Tourism Conference.
Recommendation:
That any Councillors interested in attending the LGSA 2012 Tourism Conference advise the General Manager by Friday 10 February.
GB.3 Proposal for Ku-ring-gai Financial Services to sponsor Ku-ring-gai Council's Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program 119
File: FY00275/4
To advise Council of an expression of interest received from Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd (trading as Turramurra Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank and Lindfield Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank) to sponsor Ku-ring-gai Council’s Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program.
Recommendation:
That Council accept Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd‘s proposal to sponsor the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program for 2012, 2013 and 2014.
GB.4 Constitutional Recognition of Local Government - Request for Contribution of Funds 177
File: S09137
To consider the request from the Local Government and Shires Association of NSW for a financial contribution towards a national advertising campaign to raise public support for the constitutional recognition of Local Government.
Recommendation:
That Council considers whether to pay the special levy.
GB.5 Local Government Remuneration Tribunal 2012 Review 305
File: S03158/2
To consider making a submission to the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal in regards to the categories of councils under s. 240 of the Local Government Act 1993.
Recommendation:
That Council receive and note the letter from the Tribunal.
GB.6 Investment Report as at 31 December 2011 325
File: S05273
To present to Council investment allocations and returns on investments for December 2011.
Recommendation:
That the summary of investments and performance for December 2011 be received and noted. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
GB.7 208 The Comenarra Parkway, Wahroonga - Construction of a Swimming Pool 343
File: DA0557/11
Ward: Comenarra
Applicant: Outside Living Pty Ltd
Owner: Mr Stuart Quirk & Mrs Simone Quirk
To determine Development Application DA0557/11 which is for the construction of a swimming pool and associated works
Recommendation:
Approval.
GB.8 24 Tryon Road Lindfield - Demolition of Existing Dwelling & Erection of 5 Townhouses, Basement Car Parking, Landscaping and Strata Subdivision 392
File: DA0274/11
Ward: Roseville
Applicant: Glendinning Minto & Associates
Owner: PTL Pty Ltd
Demolition of existing dwelling, granny flat and erection of 5 townhouses, parking, landscaping and strata subdivision
Recommendation:
Approval.
GB.9 Environmental Levy Small Grants Scheme - Round Thirteen 486
File: S04553
To seek Council’s endorsement to fund round thirteen (13) of the Community Small Grants Scheme funded by the Environmental Levy.
Recommendation:
That Council supports the recommendation of the small grants assessment panel to fund thirteen (13) projects under round thirteen of the Environmental Levy Small Grants Scheme.
GB.10 Heritage Reference Committee - Notes of Meeting held 21 November 2011 493
File: S07620
To have Council consider the notes of the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) meetings held on 21 November 2011.
Recommendation:
That Council receive and note the Heritage Reference Committee meeting notes and attachments from 21 November 2011.
GB.11 Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan 500
File: S03938
To consider a formal commitment to the Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan (SHCWQIP) project, coordinated by the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority (SMCMA).
Recommendation:
That Council formally commits to the Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan (SHCWQIP) and provides funding of $10,000 per year to the project over the next three years (FY2011/2012 to FY2013/2014). This financial contribution has been accounted for from the ‘water quality and quantity and river health analysis’ project budget (which is funded through a combination of Environmental Levy and general funds).
GB.12 New South Wales Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme 525
File: S04553
To advise Council of the NSW Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme being administered by the Division of Local Government.
Recommendation:
That Council notify the Division of Local Government that it wishes to lodge an application under the Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme in an amount up to $2 million for the following projects:
· Gordon Library upgrade – approximately $1 million community project;
· selected Building assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition – including public toilet blocks; and
· car park assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition.
GB.13 Expressions of Interest EOI 11/2011 - Design and Construction of Emergency Services Facilities 555
File: S09043
To advise Council of the Expressions of Interest 11/2011, received for the design and construction of Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Wahroonga and to seek approval to call selective tenders from the recommended short listed companies.
Recommendation:
That Council approve the calling of select tenders from those companies nominated in this report for the design and construction of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Wahroonga.
GB.14 Tender T48/2011 - Allan Small Park Sports Multi-court & Playground Upgrade 574
File: S08356
To consider the tenders received for the supply and installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at Allan Small Park, Saiala Road, East Killara and appoint the preferred tenderer.
Recommendation:
That Council accepts the tender from Court Craft Pty Ltd for the supply and installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at Allan Small Park, Saiala Road, East Killara.
Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting
BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS
Questions Without Notice
Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS
** ** ** ** ** **
MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 13 December 2011
Present: |
The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson (Chairperson) (Roseville Ward) Councillors S Holland & E Malicki (Comenarra Ward) Councillors E Keays & C Szatow (Gordon Ward) Councillor R Duncombe (Roseville Ward) Councillors T Hall & C Hardwick (St Ives Ward) Councillors I Cross & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward) |
|
|
Staff Present: |
Acting General Manager (Greg Piconi) Acting Director Corporate (John Giovinazzo) Manager Finance (Tino Caltabiano) Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic) Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson) Director Community (Janice Bevan) Manager Records & Governance (Matt Ryan) Minutes Secretary (Sigrid Banzer) |
The Meeting commenced at 7.00pm
The Mayor offered the Prayer
|
Apologies
File: S02194
NOTE: Both the General Manager, John McKee and Director Corporate, John Clark tendered apologies for non-attendance.
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.
Councillor Duncan McDonald advised that he and members of his family (father and sons) attended Knox Grammar School as students and it is his understanding that he has no Conflict of Interest with items on the Agenda to be discussed and there is no need for him to leave during debate of the items.
The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson declared a less than significant non-pecuniary interest in relation to GB.3 - CSIRO Land at 51 Bradfield Road, West Lindfield - KU Bradfield Park Childcare Centre (was the former President of the Kindergarten Management Committee but have no current involvement).
The Mayor also declared a less than significant non-pecuniary of interest in GB.13 - Assessment of The Glade, Wahroonga to House Athletic Facilities (one of her daughters attended Abbotsleigh but has left school) and has no current involvement and will therefore remain to debate on Items GB.3 and GB.13. However, in relation to GB.15 - Planning Proposal - Amendment to KPSO Suspension of Covenants Clause, declared that as the letter from the Department of Planning contained within the report specifically refers to the High Court decision of a case involving Dalcross Properties in Killara which owns the land immediately next door to her family home, she has a conflict so will remove herself from the Chamber during debate due to a potential pecuniary interest and also declared a potential pecuniary interest in relation to NM.1 - Council's Notification Development Control Plan (DCP 56) and advised that it relates partly to heritage items and as her family home is heritage-listed, she will leave the Chamber during debate of the item.
422 |
CONFIRMATION OF REPORTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CLOSED MEETING
File: S02499
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Keays/Duncombe)
A. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of:
C.1 Open Space Acquisition - Lindfield
B. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports and Confidential Report, as stated above:
GB.1 East Roseville Bowling Club - Lease to Club
Attachment 1: Matthews Folbigg Legal Advice dated 4 November 2011 Attachment 4: Matthews Folbigg Legal Advice dated 1 December 2011
GB.3 CSIRO Land at 51 Bradfield Road, West Lindfield - KU Bradfield Park Childcare Centre
Attachment 6: Legal Advice dated 22 January 2011 Attachment 8: KU's e-mail dated 29 November 2011 and Diary Note of telephone conversation on 2 December 2011
GB.7 Central Facilities and Events Bookings Management System Tender
Attachment 1: Tender Evaluation for Facilities and Events Bookings Management System Attachment 2: Zipporah Ltd 19646 - Financial Assessment Report from Kingsway
C.1 Open Space Acquisition - Lindfield
Attachment 1: Lindfield - Open Space Acquisition - Assessment of Park Options Attachment 2: Lindfield - Recommendation Locations for Parks and Civic Spaces
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS TO COMMUNITY GROUPS
The Mayor, on behalf of Council, welcomed and congratulated all community groups and their representatives for the outstanding work they perform for Ku-ring-gai residents throughout the area and presented cheques to the representatives present at the Ordinary Meeting of Council.
Address the Council
The following members of the public addressed Council on Item GB.5 (Minute No 448) Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra - Sponsorship Proposal - 2012:
R Prussing
L Wilson
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS
The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:
Late Items: |
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council held 6 December 2011
Refer GB.19 - Investment Report as at 30 November 2011 - Report by Acting Director Corporate dated 6 December 2011
|
Councillors Information: |
North St Ives Public School - Removal of Vegetation - Memorandum
by Director Operations dated 7 December 2011 in answer to a Question Without
Notice raised by Councillor Tony Hall at the Ordinary Meeting of Council held
on |
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs
423 |
Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council
File: S02131
|
|
Meeting held 6 December 2011 Minutes numbered 405 to 421
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Keays/McDonald)
That Minutes numbered 405 to 421 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
minutes from the Mayor
424 |
Gift of Items for Local History Collection
File: S02565 Vide: MM.1
The following member of the public addressed Council:
S Doyle
|
|
I would like to inform Councillors of a recent gift to Council of three items that will become a valued part of our Local History Collection.
The gifts were recently presented to me by Stuart Doyle, formerly Council's Protocol Officer, who commenced his employment at Ku-ring-gai Council in 1947 and retired in 1984, after 37 years service to our community.
Stuart has taken a very keen interest in Council’s history and our Local History Collection, which is available for public viewing at Gordon Library.
The first item Stuart has given to Council is the actual bible used at the swearing in ceremony of the Provisional Municipal Council on 2 November 1928 when the shire of Ku-ring-gai was re-constituted as a municipality.
The Bible is signed by the then Town Clerk, Arthur Havelock Hirst, and the eleven aldermen present at the time: George Christie (Mayor), William Henry Read (Deputy Mayor), Fred Chilton, Christopher Bowes Thistlethwayte, Arie Johannes Kryn Dorsman, Herbert Edgar McIntosh, Walter Cresswell O'Reilly, Audley Hubert Brennan, Montague Ernest Daniel Selby, Stephen Percy Mayor Cowley, and James William Davies.
Stuart also gave me two medallions. The first was to commemorate Her Majesty the Queen’s visit to NSW in 1954. Council struck 10,000 of the medallions and presented them to school children throughout Ku-ring-gai.
The other medallion commemorates the 1906 to 1956 Jubilee
marking the first
As one of the oldest Councils in Sydney, we value our history and these items will be a very welcome addition to our Local History Collection.
I would like to publicly thank Stuart Doyle for his kind donation of these three historical items.
|
|
Resolved:
A. That the Mayor write to Stuart Doyle thanking him for his donation to Council of the three historical items.
B. That the items be included in Council’s Local History Collection at Gordon Library.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
Recommendations from Committee
Minutes of Ku-ring-gai Traffic Committee
File: CY00022/3
Vide: RC.1
Meeting held 1 December 2011
Minutes numbered KTC17 to KTC19
The following member of the public addressed Council on a Ku-ring-gai Traffic Committee matter:
H Willis
425 |
General Matter Items under Delegated Authority
File: S02738 Vide Minute No KTC17
|
|
Advice on matters considered under Delegated Authority.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Duncombe)
That the information regarding traffic facilities approved during October and November 2011 be noted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
426 |
Meeting Dates 2012
File: CY00022/3 Vide Minute No KTC18
|
|
To determine the Ku-ring-gai Traffic Committee meeting dates for 2012.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Duncombe)
That the Ku-ring-gai Traffic Committee meetings in 2012 be scheduled for the dates shown below:
23 February 22 March 19 April 24 May 21 June 19 July 23 August 20 September 25 October 22 November
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
427 |
Pibrac Avenue, Warrawee
File: TM12/03
Ward: Wahroonga Electorate: Davidson Vide Minute No KTC19
|
|
To consider existing parking restrictions in Pibrac Avenue , Warrawee.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Duncombe)
A. That the strong resident agreement to the overall parking arrangements in Pibrac Avenue be noted.
B. That the existing parking restrictions in Pibrac Avenue remain unaltered but that road safety in the street continue to be monitored.
C. That residents of Pibrac Avenue be informed of Council’s decision.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
GENERAL BUSINESS
428 |
Assessment of The Glade, Wahroonga to house athletic facilities
File: S02670 Vide: GB.13
|
|
For Council to consider the results of the Preliminary Site Assessment investigating the option to locate athletic facilities at The Glade, Wahroonga.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)
That consideration of the results of the Preliminary Site Assessment investigating the option to locate athletic facilities at The Glade, Wahroonga be deferred pending a site inspection.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson, Councillors Duncombe, Keays, McDonald, Szatow and Cross
Against the Resolution: Councillors Hardwick, Holland, Malicki and Hall
|
429 |
CSIRO Land at 51 Bradfield Road, West Lindfield - KU Bradfield Park Childcare Centre
File: S07457 Vide: GB.3
|
|
To update Council on progress to maintain current
childcare services at
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)
A. That
Council not purchase for market value at $900,000 CSIRO’s lot at
B. That Council continue to pursue from the Federal Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research Minister and other State and Federal Members to request a concessional sale to Council of CSIRO’s land for community purposes.
C. That Council officers further investigate the site options, demand for childcare services and costs for an alternate childcare facility on Community Land in the Lindfield area.
D. That
Council continue to hold over under the expired lease with CSIRO until
E. That Council enter into a conjunctional Property Disposal Agreement with CSIRO to sell 51 to 53 Bradfield Road, Lindfield in two years time pending the reclassification of Council’s Lot at 53 Bradfield Road, Lindfield from Community to Operational Land.
F. That Council enter into a two year lease and sub-lease with KU Children’s Services and give public notice for the lease of 53 Bradfield Road, Lindfield in accordance with section 47 of the Local Government Act.
G. That
Council enter into a two year lease with CSIRO of CSIRO’s land at
H. That under their delegated powers, the Mayor and General Manager affix Council’s Seal and sign and execute the lease documentation.
I. That a report come back to Council following the above investigations, containing recommendations for a formalised outcome.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
430 |
Central Facilities and Events Bookings Management System Tender
File: S08794 Vide: GB.7
|
|
To report on the results of the open tender for the supply and implementation of a central Facilities and Event Bookings Management System and to seek approval to accept the tender from the preferred tenderer.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Hall)
A. That Council accept the tender from Zipporah Ltd for the supply and implementation of a centralised facilities and events bookings system.
B. That the execution of all documents relating to the tender be delegated to the Mayor and General Manager.
C. That the Common Seal be affixed to any necessary documents.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
431 |
27 to 29 Tryon Road, Lindfield - Alterations and Additions, Landscaping and Boundary Adjustment to an Existing Aged Care Facility
File: DA0491/11 Vide: GB.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To determine DA0491/11, which proposes alterations and additions, landscaping and boundary adjustment to an existing aged care facility.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Hall)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979
A. That Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No.1 – Development Standards to Clause 48(c) – landscaped area of State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 is well founded. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case.
B. That Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No.1 – Development Standards to Clause 25H(3-a) – minimum lot sizes of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance is well founded. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case.
AND
C. That Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objections under SEPP1 are well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0491/11 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0491/11 for alterations and additions, landscaping and a boundary adjustment to an existing aged care facility on land at 27-29 Tryon Road, Lindfield for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
3. No demolition of extra fabric
Alterations to, and demolition of the existing building shall be limited to that documented on the approved plans (by way of notation). No approval is given or implied for removal and/or rebuilding of any portion of the existing building which is shown to be retained.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the development consent.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
4. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
5. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
7. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Tryon Road and Tryon lane over the site frontage. · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
8. Structural adequacy (alterations and additions)
Prior to commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that that those components of the building to be retained and/or altered will be structurally sound and able to withstand the excavation and demolition process.
C1. Note: Evidence from a qualified practising structural engineer, demonstrating compliance with the above and detailing, where relevant, means of support for those parts of the retained building shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development can be undertaken in accordance with accepted construction practices as indicated on the endorsed development plans, without the need for modification of the consent.
9. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The CTMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
· Demolition · Excavation · Concrete pour · Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath · Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
When a satisfactory CTMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved CTMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines may be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
10. Work zone
A Works Zone is to be provided in Tryon Road subject to the approval of the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee.
No loading or unloading must be undertaken from the public road or nature strip unless within a Works Zone which has been approved and paid for.
In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.
11. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
12. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
13. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
14. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
15. Trunk protection
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the trunk/s are protected by the placement of 2.0 metres lengths of 50 x 100mm hardwood timbers spaced at 150mm centres and secured by 2mm wire at 300mm wide spacing over suitable protective padding material. The trunk protection shall be maintained intact until the completion of all work on site.
Any damage to the tree/s shall be treated immediately by an experienced Horticulturist/Arborist, with minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate and a report detailing the works carried out shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority:
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
16. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
17. Construction waste management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s DCP 40 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management.
The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.
Note: The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
18. Boundary adjustment
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the boundary adjustment has been registered at the Department of Lands.
Reason: So that works are not carried out across the property boundary.
19. Parking space dimensions
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the visitor parking spaces have been increased in width to 2.6 metres, as required for Class 3 users under AS2890.1:2004 Off street car parking, and that the three parallel staff spaces have been increased to 5.9 metres and 6.2 metres length as shown in Figure 2.5 of AS2890.1:2004. The landscape bed adjacent to the new boundary line is not to be reduced to less than 500mm width as a result.
Reason: To ensure adequate vehicular access for visitors and staff.
20. Amendments to stormwater plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved stormwater plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above stormwater plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:
· The plan shall be amended to reflect the changes to the paved and filled areas adjacent to Tree 1 – Liquidambar styraciflua (Liquidambar) in accordance with the approved ground floor plan. · To preserve Tree 1 – Liquidambar styraciflua (Liquidambar) the 150mm diameter stormwater pipe between the rainwater tank and the northern (front) boundary shall be relocated a minimum distance of 7 metres from the tree’s trunk.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
21. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways;
· The plan shall be amended to reflect the changes to the paved and filled areas adjacent to Tree 1 – Liquidambar styraciflua (Liquidambar) in accordance with the approved ground floor plan.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended are required by this condition.
Note: An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site
22. Amendments to approved engineering plans
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above engineering plan(s) shall be amended as follows:
Roof drainage from the existing building to be retained is to be shown.
The above amendments are required to ensure compliance with the following:
· Australian Standard 2890.1 - “Off-street car parking”. · Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management Development Control Plan 47.
Note: An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
23. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
24. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $12,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $12,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
25. Access for people with disabilities (commercial)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities from the public domain and all car parking areas on site to all tenancies within the building is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.
Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate. All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.
Reason: To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian standards.
26. Stormwater management plan
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority, scale construction plans and specifications in relation to the stormwater management and disposal system for the development. The plan(s) must be based on Northrop Drawings 11025 C1.01, C1.04, C3.01, all Revision 3 and C3.02, Revision 1 and must include the following detail:
· exact location and reduced level of discharge point to the public drainage system · Layout of the property drainage system components, including but not limited to (as required) gutters, downpipes, spreaders, pits, swales, kerbs, cut-off and intercepting drainage structures, subsoil drainage, flushing facilities and all ancillary stormwater plumbing - all designed for a 235mm/hour rainfall intensity for a duration of five (5) minutes (1:50 year storm recurrence) · location(s), dimensions and specifications for the rainwater storage and reuse tanks and systems and where proprietary products are to be used, manufacturer specifications or equivalent shall be provided · specifications for reticulated pumping facilities (including pump type and manufacturer specifications) and ancillary plumbing to fully utilise rainwater . · downpipes and piped drainage for existing roof areas. · Details of the outlet from the grated pit in the northern corner of the site, including its accurate route through the adjoining proposed Lot 12 if it extends into that lot.
The above construction drawings and specifications are to be prepared by a qualified and experienced civil/hydraulic engineer in accordance with Council’s Water Management Development Control Plan 47, Australian Standards 3500.2 and 3500.3 - Plumbing and Drainage Code and the Building Code of Australia.
Reason: To protect the environment.
27. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
28. Landscape plan
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a landscape plan has been completed in accordance with Council’s DA Guide, relevant development control plans and the conditions of consent by a Landscape Architect or qualified Landscape Designer.
Note: The Landscape Plan must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.
29. Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in Tryon Lane:
· kerb and gutter along the entire site frontage, including laybacks where required for access to parking areas.
Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve. The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.
The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works. Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 – 1996 – Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads – Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.
A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.
Reason: To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.
30. Design and construction of food preparation area
Plans and specifications complying with the requirements of the Food Act and Regulations, Australian Standard AS 4674 2004, AS 1668 Parts 1 and 2 shall be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. Plans and specifications shall address the following:
· floor plans, showing the layout of the fixtures and fittings and food storage areas; · elevations and sections showing floor, wall and ceiling construction and finishes · elevations and sections showing the installation of fixtures and fittings · cool room/freezer construction (if applicable) · external garbage storage area · external grease trap area · mechanical exhaust ventilation systems (if applicable)
Reason: To ensure compliance with standards for food premises.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
31. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
32. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
33. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
34. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
35. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
36. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
37. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
38. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
39. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
40. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
41. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
42. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
43. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
44. Maintenance period for works in public road
A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
45. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
46. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
47. Drainage to street
Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the street drainage system. New drainage line connections to the street drainage system shall conform and comply with the requirements of Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47.
Reason: To protect the environment.
48. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
49. Arborist’s report
The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival. Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
50. Canopy/root pruning
Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree/s which is necessary to accommodate the approved building works shall be undertaken by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist, with a minimum qualification of the Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect the environment.
51. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
52. Cutting of tree roots
No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
53. Approved tree works
Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:
Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
54. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
55. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
56. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
57. Construction of food preparation areas
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that food preparation and storage areas associated with the aged care facility are constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Food Act and Regulations and Australian Standard AS 4674 2004.
Reason: To ensure compliance with standards for food premises.
58. Building Code of Australia certification
Pursuant to Clause 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, the upgrading works contained within the Building Code of Australia (BCA) Report from Blackett Maguire + Goldsmith, dated 8 November 2011 are to be certified as completed by a suitable qualified person prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the BCA
59. Mechanical ventilation
Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:
1. The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:
· The Building Code of Australia · Australian Standard AS1668 · Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable
2. The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.
Note: Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
60. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
61. Certification of drainage works (dual occupancies and above)
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · retained water is connected and available for use · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of the Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification. Where an on-site detention system has been constructed, the on-site detention certification sheet contained in Appendix 4 of DCP 47 must also be completed and attached to the certification.
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
62. Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans · the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking" in terms of minimum parking space dimensions (Visitor spaces are User Class 3) · finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
63. Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, and upon completion of all works on site which may cause damage to Council's infrastructure, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:
· new concrete driveway crossings in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council · removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials) · full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction · full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing
This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
64. Construction of works in public road – approved plans
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.
The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council.
The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings. The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval. All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued.
Reason: To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.
65. Fire safety certificate
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.
Note: A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.
66. Restriction on land title – seniors living development
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that restriction as to use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, has been created restricting the occupation of the premises to:
· people 55 or over or people who have a disability · people who live with people 55 or over or people who have a disability · staff employed to assist in the administration of and provision of services to housing provided in this development
Reason: To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision certificate:
67. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to release of the linen plan/issue of the subdivision certificate, the Section 73 Sydney Water compliance certificate which refers to the subdivision application must be obtained and submitted to the Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
68. Submission of 88b instrument
Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the applicant must submit an original instrument under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act with the plan of subdivision, plus six (6) copies to Council. Ku-ring-gai Council must be named as the authority whose consent is required to release, vary or modify the burdens.
Reason: To create all required easements, rights-of-carriageway, positive covenants, restrictions-on-use or other burdens/benefits as may be required.
69. Submission of plans of subdivision (Torrens Title)
For endorsement of the subdivision certificate, the applicant shall submit an original plan of subdivision plus 6 copies, suitable for endorsement by Council. The following details must be submitted with the plan of subdivision and its copies:
a) the endorsement fee current at the time of lodgment b) the 88B instrument plus 6 copies c) all surveyor’s and/or consulting engineers’ certification(s) required under this subdivision consent d) The Section 73 (Sydney Water) Compliance Certificate for the subdivision.
Council will check the consent conditions on the subdivision. Failure to submit the required information will delay endorsement of the linen plan and may require payment of rechecking fees. Plans and copies of subdivision must not be folded. Council will not accept bonds in lieu of completing subdivision works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
70. General easement/R.O.W. provision and certification
Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, a registered surveyor is to provide details to Council that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision. If there is an existing stormwater pipe through Lot 12, an easement is to be created over it to benefit Lot 11. Alternatively, where the surveyor is of the opinion that creation of burdens and benefits is not required, then proof to this effect must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
71. Tryon Lane gates
The gates to the ambulance parking space and the visitor parking area are to remain open during visiting hours.
Reason: To provide ready vehicular access to these areas and maintain traffic flow in Tryon Lane.
72. Outdoor lighting
At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
73. Noise control – plant and machinery
All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.
74. Loading and unloading
At all times, all loading and unloading of service vehicles in connection with the use of the premises shall be carried out wholly within the site.
Reason: To ensure safe traffic movement.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
432 |
36 Northcote Road, Lindfield - Proposed Swimming Pool, Landscaping and Carport
File: DA0412/11 Vide: GB.9
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed swimming pool, landscaping and carport
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Hall)
A. That the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards to clause 60C of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance in respect of the built upon area development standard is well founded. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstance of this case.
B. That the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objection under SEPP No.1 is well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0412/11 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0412/11 for construction of a swimming pool, landscaping works and a carport on land at 36 Northcote Road, Lindfield, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with work shown in colour on the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
3. No demolition of extra fabric
Alterations to, and demolition of the existing building shall be limited to that documented on the approved plans (by way of notation). No approval is given or implied for removal and/or rebuilding of any portion of the existing building which is shown to be retained.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the development consent.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
4. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
5. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
7. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
8. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
9. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
10. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
11. Construction waste management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s DCP 40 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management.
The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.
Note: The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
12. Bush fire risk assessment (landscape plan certification)
The landscape plan shall be reviewed by a suitably qualified bushfire consultant and amended as necessary to demonstrate compliance with the asset protection zone recommendations, prior to the release of the Construction Certificate. Where vegetation is required to be removed to achieve compliance with the asset protection zone, specific details shall be provided to the Principle Certifying Authority clearly identifying the extent of necessary vegetation removal or pruning.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
13. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:
· At least 80% of the tree and shrub plantings shall be locally occurring native species selected from the Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest Endangered Ecological Community final determination species list in accordance with 4.3.9 - Biodiversity - of Council’s Development Control Plan No. 38.
· The site is to support a minimum number of 3 canopy replenishment trees that shall attain at least 13 metres height at the site in accordance with 4.3.6 - Tree Replenishment - of Council’s Development Control Plan No. 38. Two (2) canopy trees must be provided withing the front setback of the site. At least 80% of these trees shall be locally occurring native species selected from the Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest Endangered Ecological Community final determination species list.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended are required by this condition.
Note: An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site
14. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
15. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $12,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $12,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
16. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
17. Paving near trees
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that paving works within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s will be of a type and construction to ensure that existing water infiltration and gaseous exchange to the tree/s root system is maintained:
Note: Details of the paving prepared by a suitably qualified professional shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
18. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
19. Bush fire risk certification
Bush fire protection measures shall be carried out in accordance with the following bush fire risk assessment, report and certificate, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Prior to the issue of the construction certificate, the principal certifying authority must be satisfied that the construction certificate is in accordance with the recommendations of the report and certificate as listed above.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
20. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
21. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
22. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
23. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
24. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
25. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
26. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
27. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
28. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
29. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
30. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
31. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
32. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
33. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
34. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
35. Drainage to existing system
Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.
Reason: To protect the environment.
36. Arborist’s report
The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival. Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
37. Stockpiling of top soil
Top soil shall be stripped from areas to be developed and stock-piled within the site. Stock-piled topsoil must be located outside drainage lines and tree canopies and be protected from run-on water by suitably positioned diversion banks. Where the period of storage will exceed fourteen (14) days, stock-piles are to be seeded or sprayed with an appropriate emulsion solution to minimise particle movement.
Reason: To protect the environment.
38. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
39. Cutting of tree roots
No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
40. Approved tree works
Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:
Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
41. Hand excavation
All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
42. Thrust boring
Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise the thrust boring method. Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
43. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
44. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
45. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The 8 canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
46. Removal of noxious plants & weeds
The following noxious and/or environmental weed species shall be removed from the property prior to completion of building works:
Reason: To protect the environment.
47. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
48. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. A119907 and dated 8 August 2011 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
49. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
50. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
51. Swimming pool (part 1)
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:
C1 1. Access to the pool/spa shall be restricted by a child resistant barrier in accordance with the regulations prescribed in the Swimming Pools Act, 1992:
(a) The pool shall not be filled with water or be allowed to collect stormwater until the child resistant barrier is installed; and (b) The barrier is to conform to the requirements of AS 1926-1 2007 Fences and Gates for Private Swimming Pools.
Reason: To ensure the safety of children.
2. Any mechanical equipment associated with the swimming pool and/or spa pool shall be located in a sound-attenuating enclosure and positioned so that it is setback a minimum of 2m from the boundary of any adjoining premises. The Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the sound levels associated with the swimming pool/spa filtration system and associated mechanical equipment do not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
52. Pool overflow to sewer
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate a high level overflow pipe is to be provided from the back of the skimmer box to the filter backwash line discharging to the sewer. This line must not directly vent the receiving Sydney Water sewer. This requirement is to collect stormwater overflow from the swimming pool surface only. A certificate from the installer, indicating compliance with this condition, must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To provide satisfactory drainage.
53. Compliance with bush fire assessment, report and certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all recommendations listed in the bush fire risk assessment and report below have been complied with:
Reason: Statutory requirement.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
54. Outdoor lighting
At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
55. Noise control – plant and machinery
All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.
56. Swimming pool (part 2)
At all times:
1. Access to the swimming pool must be restricted by fencing or other measures as required by the Swimming Pools Act 1992. 2. Noise levels associated with spa/pool pumping units shall not exceed 5dB(A) at the boundaries of the site. 3. Devices or structures used for heating swimming pool water must not be placed where they are visible from a public place. 4. For the purpose of health and amenity, the disposal of backwash and/or the emptying of a swimming pool into a reserve, watercourse, easement or storm water drainage system is prohibited. These waters are to discharge via a permanent drainage line into Sydney Water's sewer in accordance with Australian Standard AS3500.2 section 10.9. Permission is to be obtained from Sydney Water prior to the emptying of any pool to the sewer. 5. Lighting from the swimming pool and other communal facilities shall not detrimentally impact the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings.
Reason: Health and amenity.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY |
433 |
50 Burns Road, Wahroonga - Alterations and Additions to an Existing Dwelling House
File: DA0488/11 Vide: GB.10
|
||||||||||||||||
|
To determine Development Application 0488/11, which proposes alterations and additions to a dwelling house.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Hall)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979
A. That the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objection under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards seeking a variation to Council’s height standard in Clause 46(2) in the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance is well founded. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case as there would be no impacts for adjoining properties, the streetscape and/or nearby heritage items.
AND
B. That the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objection under SEPP No. 1 is well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0488/11 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0488/11 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling on land at 50 Burns Road, Wahroonga for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with work shown in colour on the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
3. No demolition of extra fabric
Alterations to, and demolition of the existing building shall be limited to that documented on the approved plans (by way of notation). No approval is given or implied for removal and/or rebuilding of any portion of the existing building which is shown to be retained.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the development consent.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION:
4. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
5. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
7. Structural adequacy (alterations and additions)
Prior to commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that that those components of the building to be retained and/or altered will be structurally sound and able to withstand the excavation and demolition process.
C1. Note: Evidence from a qualified practising structural engineer, demonstrating compliance with the above and detailing, where relevant, means of support for those parts of the retained building shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development can be undertaken in accordance with accepted construction practices as indicated on the endorsed development plans, without the need for modification of the consent.
8. Sediment controls
Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.
The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the ‘NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE:
9. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
10. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It
is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the
builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of
$12,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or
industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $12,000,
nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by
the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold
within
Reason: Statutory requirement.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE OR PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION (WHICHEVER COMES FIRST):
11. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED DURING THE DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES:
12. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
13. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
14. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
15. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
16. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
17. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
18. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
19. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
20. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
21. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
22. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
23. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
24. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
25. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
26. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
27. Drainage to existing system
Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.
Reason: To protect the environment.
28. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
29. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
30. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE:
31. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. A121660 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
32. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
434 |
Golden Jubilee Field, Nos 7 & 7A Esk Street, North Wahroonga - Demolition of Existing Structures and Construction of New Facilities for the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services (SES) and Rural Fire Service (RFS)
File: DA0513/11 Vide: GB.11
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Demolition of existing structures and erection of buildings for occupation as the headquarters of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Service (SES) and Rural Fire Service (RFS), with associate access, parking and landscape works.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Malicki)
A. PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979
That Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to development application DA0513/11 for the demolition of existing structures and the erection of three buildings for occupation as the headquarters of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Service (SES) and Rural Fire Service (RFS), with associate access, parking and landscape works at Golden Jubilee Field, Nos. 7 & 7A Esk Street, North Wahroonga for a period of two years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions.
CONDITIONS THAT IDENTIFY APPROVED PLANS:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the form of the development undertaken is in accordance with the determination of Council.
2. Compliance with recommendations of supporting documentation
All of the recommendations contained in the supporting documentation listed in condition 1 are to be satisfied, including the requirements for further investigation and preparation of management plans contained in the Stage 2 Preliminary Contamination Investigation, prepared by Environmental Investigation Services, subject to any modifications required by conditions of this consent.
Reason: To ensure that the form of the development undertaken is in accordance with the determination of Council.
3. Approved tree works
Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:
Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
4. Approved landscape plans
Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
5.
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
6. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
7. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE:
8. Endorsement of water management plans by geotechnical engineer
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the water management plans for the development have been endorsed by the Geotechnical Engineer.
Reason: To protect the environment
9. Amendments to approved engineering plans
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above engineering plan(s) shall be amended as follows:
(i) Overflow from the rainwater tank adjacent to Buildings 1 and 2 (the SES buildings) shall be piped to a level spreader system on the western side of the site, located on the rear of the rock shelf. The rock overlay shown on Drawing C2.01 shall instead be provided as a rock surround. (ii) Overflow from the two 20 000 litres tanks and the paved areas shall be piped to a level spreader system on the eastern side of the site, which is upslope of the bitumen path and as close to the compound as possible without disturbing the root systems of the screen planting. (iii) Gross pollutant traps are to be provided upstream of Pits P5 and P1.
Other amendments may be made to reduce the rainwater tank volumes if required and to provide a single overhead connection into the above-ground rainwater tanks. The two above ground rainwater tanks may be provided with a mains water top-up to allow for a certain permanent storage volume. This has been accounted for in the assessment.
Note: An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect the environment.
10. Car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer and an access consultant must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standards 2890.1 and AS2890.2 · the dimensions and locations of accessible parking spaces, including lengths and widths, comply with the relevant standards · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
11. Works required to achieve an asset protection zone to the existing car park areas to the south of the emergency services compound and the north of the southern most oval
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that details of specific tree removal or other vegetation clearance works, if any, necessary to achieve an asset protection zone have been provided. In particular the vegetation to be managed is to include those areas adjacent the fence line of the compound and within the car park areas between the emergency services site and the oval to the south.
The proposed works shall be consistent with the recommendations of the Bushfire Protection Assessment by Ecological Australia, dated 16/09/11, pg 6, 2.2 Vegetation Types and pg 8, 3.2 Vegetation Management.
These details are to be endorsed by a bushfire consultant who is certified by FPA Australia and endorsed as appropriate by an Arborist with a minimum qualification of AQF 5 to ensure appropriate vegetation only is removed.
Reason: To ensure compliance with bushfire protection requirements
12. Amendments to approved landscape plan
Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:
The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:
(i) The plan shall be assessed by a qualified bushfire consultant who is a member of FPA Australia. The plan shall be amended as required by the bushfire consultant to ensure compliance with the recommendations of the Bushfire Protection Assessment prepared by Ecological Australia, dated 16/09/11. The amended plan shall be endorsed by the bushfire consultant. (ii) Reference to asset protection zones within the bushland areas to the west and east of the emergency services site and the playing field shall be deleted as they are not endorsed as part of the Bushfire Protection Assessment prepared by Ecological Australia. (iii) Delete the path to the west of building 1 and replace with either lawn, low planting or gravel and install log vehicle barriers to protect the building from reversing vehicles. (iv) To ensure that vegetation does not interfere with pedestrian path the garden bed between the fence and existing pedestrian path from Building 1 to rear of building 2 shall be widened to a minimum of 1.5m. This may be achieved by realigning the existing pedestrian path and /or fence and retaining wall in this area. (v) Provide details of replacement landscaping, reinstatement of log barriers and installation of retaining walls as required to the bank area adjacent the vehicular entry and new car park pavement to Building 3. (vi) Correa alba shall be substituted for a similar plant from the Sydney Sandstone Ridgetop Woodland vegetation community. (vii) Reference to Doryanthes within the plant schedule is inconsistent with the actual proposed planting. The plans should are to be amended for consistency. (viii) Show the location of the Eucalyptus haemastoma to be planted in the vicinity of trees 31, 34, 35, 33, and amend the plant schedule number to include this tree.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended are required by this condition.
Note: An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site
13. Landscape plan
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a landscape plan has been completed in accordance with Council’s DA Guide, relevant development control plans and the conditions of consent by a Landscape Architect or qualified Landscape Designer.
Note: The Landscape Plan must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.
14.
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
15. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
16. Access for people with disabilities (residential)
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.
Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate. All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.
Reason: To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE OR PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION (WHICHEVER COMES FIRST):
17. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION:
18. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
19. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached. The traffic control plans are to indicate when it will be necessary to provide traffic controllers for the safety of other Field users.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The CTMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. The report is to demonstrate how construction activities will be kept separate from other activities at Golden Jubilee Field.
Works are to be restricted to weekdays only.
Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).
When a satisfactory CTMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved CTMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines may be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
20. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan prior to commencement of works.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
21. Further geotechnical input
The geotechnical works implementation, inspection, testing and monitoring program for the excavation and construction works must be in accordance with the report by Jeffery and Katauskas. Over the course of the works, a qualified geotechnical engineer must complete the following:
· further geotechnical investigations and testing recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary · further monitoring and inspection at the hold points recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary · written report(s) including certification(s) of the geotechnical inspection, testing and monitoring programs
The geotechnical engineer is to advise on an appropriate location for the two 20 000 litre rainwater tanks with a view to acceptable differential settlements and to advise on the structural design of any slab or structure required for their support.
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
22. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
23. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
24. Discharge of rainwater tank overflow and runoff
Overflow from the rainwater tanks and runoff from impervious areas shall be piped to a level spreader system. Overflow from the SES building and garage rainwater tank is to be conveyed to a level spreader on the rock shelf on the western side of the carpark, in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer. Overflow from the Bush Fire Brigade building and paved areas is to be conveyed to a level spreader just outside the compound (but clear of the screen planting), in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer. The level spreader design shall incorporate rock surround instead of rock overlay.
Reason: To protect the environment.
25. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
26. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
27. Sewage management
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Applicant shall submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority (PCA), construction details/specifications, which is to including an Operation and Maintenance Plan incorporating an ongoing Operation and Maintenance Manual, for the provision of the sewage management system within the subject property. Design drawings are to be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced person.
Reason: Satisfactory sewage management.
28. Noise from plant in residential zones
Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.
Note: A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.
Reason: To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.
29. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
30. No storage of material beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
31. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
32.
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the location specified or specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
33. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
34. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
· Tree protection zone.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
35. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
36. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
37. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
38. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
39. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
40. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
41. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
42. Sign – Principal Certifying Authority
A sign shall be erected in a prominent position on the site which states the name and contact details of the Principal Certifying Authority.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED DURING THE DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES:
43. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
44. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
45. Asset protection zones
The intent of measures is to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to prevent direct flame contact with a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:
(a) At the commencement of building works the entire site shall be managed as an inner protection area (IPA) as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006 and the NSW Rural Fires Service’s document ‘Standards for Asset Protection Zones’.
46. Water and utilities
The intent of measures is to provide adequate services of water for the protection of buildings during and after the passage of a bush fire, and to locate gas and electricity so as not to contribute to the risk of fire to a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:
(a) Water, electricity and gas are to comply with section 4.1.3 of Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006.
47. Access
The intent of measures for property access is to provide safe access to/from the public road system for fire fighters providing property protection during a bush fire and for occupants faced with evacuation. To achieve this, the following conditions apply:
(a) Property access roads shall comply with section 4.1.3(2) of Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006.
48. Design and construction
The intent of measures is that buildings are designed and constructed to withstand the potential impacts of bush fire attack. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply;
(a) New construction shall comply with section 9 (BAL FZ) Australian Standard AS3959-2009 ‘Construction of Buildings in Bush Fire-Prone Areas’. However, where any material, element of construction or system when tested to the method described in Australian Standard AS 1530.8.2 ‘Methods for Fire Tests on Building Materials, Components and Structures’ Part 8.2: ‘Tests on Elements of Construction for Buildings Exposed to Simulated Bushfire Attack – Large Flaming Sources’, it shall comply with Clause 13.8 of the Standard except that flaming of the specimen is not permitted.
(b) Window assemblies shall comply with one of the following:
(i) Clause 9.5.2 if AS 3959-2009 as modified above, (ii) They shall comply with the following: · Completely protected by a non-combustible and non perforated bushfire shutter that complies with Section 3.7 of AS 3950-2009 excluding parts (e) & (f) · Window frames and hardware shall be metal · Glazing shall be toughened glass minimum 6mm · Seals to stiles, head and sills or thresholds shall be manufactured from materials having a flammability index no greater than 5 or from silicone · The openable portion of the window shall be screened internally or externally with screens that comply with Clause 9.5.1A
(c) External doors and door frames (not including garage doors) shall comply with one of the following:
(i) Clause 9.5.3 or 9.5.4 of AS 3959-2009 as modified above, or (ii) They shall comply with the following:
· Completely protected by a non-combustible and non perforated bushfire shutter that complies with Section 3.7 of AS3959-2009 excluding parts (e) & (f) · Doors shall be non-combustible · Externally fitted hardware that supports the panel in its function of opening and closing shall be metal · Where doors incorporate glazing, the glazing shall be toughened glass minimum 6mm · Seals to stiles, head and sills or thresholds shall be manufactured from materials having a flammability index no greater than 5 or from silicone · Door frames shall be metal · Doors shall be tight fitting to the doorframe and to an abutting door if applicable · Weather strips, draught excluders or draught seals shall be installed at the base of side-hung external doors.
(d) Roofing shall be gutterless or guttering and valleys are to be screened to prevent the build up of flammable materials. Any materials used shall be non combustible.
49. Excavation and construction work hours
Excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (i.e. concrete pours and standing of plant), approval for such will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties and users of the park.
50. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
51. Maintenance of sediment controls
To preserve and enhance the natural environment, all soil erosion and sediment control structures shall be inspected following each storm event and any necessary maintenance work shall be undertaken to ensure their continued proper operation. Sediment shall be removed from the soil erosion and sediment control structures when no more than forty percent (40%) capacity has been reached. These structures shall continue in proper operation until all development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised.
Reason: To protect the environment.
52. Delivery vehicles - covered
To prevent pollution, all vehicles making a delivery to or from the site are to be covered to prevent loose materials, dust etc falling from the vehicles.
Reason: To protect the environment.
53. Cleared areas
To prevent pollution, any areas cleared of vegetation where there is a flowpath greater than 12.0 metres in length shall have a properly constructed silt fence erected to intercept runoff.
Reason: To protect the environment.
54. Soil stockpiles
Topsoil shall be stripped from areas to be developed and stock-piled within the site. Stock-piled topsoil on the site shall be located outside drainage lines and be protected from run-on water by suitably positioned diversion banks. Where the period of storage will exceed 14 days stock-piles are to be sprayed with an appropriate emulsion solution or seeded to minimise particle movement.
Reason: To protect the environment.
55. Reuse of topsoil
Excavated topsoil is to be re-used on-site during the carrying out of the landscaping.
Reason: To protect the environment.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF THE OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE:
56. Certification of drainage works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate. The geotechnical engineer is also to endorse the documentation.
Reason: To protect the environment.
57. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge · as built location and internal dimensions of all rainwater tanks on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
58. Certification of as constructed driveway/car park
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans · the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standards 2890.1 and 2890.2. · the accessible parking spaces comply with the relevant standards.
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer and access consultant indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
59. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
60. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
61. Approval to operate
A separate application pursuant to the Local Government (Approvals) Regulation 1999 is to be made to Council for the operation of the subject wastewater system. This must be submitted before final commissioning of the system.
Reason: Statutory requirement and to maintain the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing health, safety and protection of people.
62. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
63. Noxious plants/weeds
Noxious and/or undesirable plant species shall be removed from the property prior to completion of the proposed building works. Documentary evidence of compliance with this condition shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED ON AN ONGOING BASIS:
64. Operation and maintenance manual
An Operation and Maintenance Manual for the sewage treatment system incorporating the service records shall be kept on site in a readily accessible location and be made available to Council Officers upon request. Provision is to be made for an all weather emergency break down procedural sheet/poster which is to be located in a prominent position in sight of site personnel. Any pollution incidents occurring or likely to occur from the sewage treatment system must be reported to Council immediately.
Reason: To maintain the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing health, safety and protection of people.
65. Alarm/monitoring system
The sewage management system shall be fitted with an alarm/monitoring system to indicate any failure. The alarm system shall comprise audible and visible alarms with a muting facility for the audible alarm.
Reason: To maintain the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing health, safety and protection of people.
66. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Advice to applicant
1. The exemption issued by the Minister for Water is subject to a condition requiring the public authority to comply with any directions given by the Minister for the protection of waterfront land or any river, lake or estuary to which that land has frontage. Works which degrade the watercourse or waterfront land may be subject to compliance action.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
435 |
Council Land South Turramurra - Re-exhibition of Planning Proposal and Public Hearing
File: S08403 Vide: GB.12
|
|
To report back on the re-exhibition of the Planning Proposal and Public Hearing to reclassify and rezone Council land at South Turramurra.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Holland)
A. That Council forward the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning Director-General and request that a Local Environmental Plan DLEP 216 be made to amend the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance to zone the currently unzoned and unformed portions of Hall Street and Warner Avenue, South Turramurra to Residential 2C and to reclassify six parcels of land (Lot 1 DP 746618, Lot 3 DP 746618, Lot 1 DP 847214, Lot 74 DP 216500, Lot 1 DP 840228 and Lot 2 DP 840228) from Community to Operational land.
B. That Council discharge all its interests under the Local Government Act, 1993 on Council land (Lots 1 & 2 in DP 840228) 21 Chisholm Street, South Turramurra.
C. That the Development Control Plan and subdivision plan for the subject sites take into consideration the requirements of the recommendations of the reclassification report on the public hearing prepared by Ludvik & Associates, December 2011.
D. That all persons who made a submission be notified of Council’s decision.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
436 |
Voluntary Planning Agreement - UTS Site
File: S08640 Vide: GB.16
|
|
For Council to consider an offer to enter into a Planning Agreement with Defence Housing Australia in relation to the Edgelea development at Lindfield, also known locally as the UTS Ku-ring-gai Campus development.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)
A. That public notice of the draft Planning Agreement and Explanatory Note be given, and a copy of those documents be made available for inspection, in accordance with section 93G of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
B. That the public notice for the draft Planning Agreement and Explanatory Note be given contemporaneously with any other public notice that is required to be given for the Development Application for a period of not less than 28 days. C. That in accordance with section 55(3)(i) of the Local Government Act,1993, Council not call tenders for the sports field and associated amenities because of extenuating circumstances and an unavailability of tenderers, consequently a satisfactory result would not be achieved by inviting tenders.
Reason Because DHA is the registered proprietor of the land and the only entity with the benefit of the Concept Approval, DHA is the only entity that can carry out the appropriate works to provide the facilities and that if the Council did not contribute to those works, the facilities would not be completed and would not be functional to the standard desired by the Council.
D. That the General Manager be given delegated authority to negotiate any terms of the Planning Agreement with DHA that do not or will not affect the value of the contributions to be made under that agreement to protect Council’s interests.
E. That a further report be submitted to Council following the public exhibition period.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
437 |
Asset Management Plans for Car Parks and Recreational Facilities
File: S06232 Vide: GB.17
|
|
To seek Council's endorsement of the Asset Management Plans for Recreational Facilities and Car Parks.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Duncombe)
A. That Council endorses the Interim Asset Management Plan for Car Parks and Recreational Facilities.
B That Council maintains the level of funding for the renewal of Council’s Recreational Facilities and Car Parks in accordance with the adopted Long Term Financial Plan.
C A review of all interim asset management plans will be undertaken during the development of the Asset Strategy.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
438 |
Investment Report as at 30 November 2011
File: S05273 Vide: GB.19
|
|
To present to Council investment allocations and returns on investments for November 2011.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Holland/McDonald)
A. That the summary of investments and performance for November 2011 be received and noted.
B. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
439 |
Open Space Acquisition - Lindfield
File: S04601 Vide: C.1
|
|
In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(c), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.
Section 10A(2)(c) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public in respect of information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
The matter is classified confidential because it deals with the proposed acquisition and/or disposal of property.
It is not in the public interest to release this information as it would prejudice Council’s ability to acquire and/or dispose of the property on appropriate terms and conditions.
Report by Director Strategy & Environment dated 21 November 2011
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Mayor, Councillor Anderson/Councillor Duncombe)
That Council proceeds in the manner outlined in the report.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson, Councillors Duncombe, Hardwick, Holland, Keays, Malicki, McDonald, Szatow and Cross
Against the Resolution: Councillor Hall
|
Motions of which due Notice has been given
440 |
Independent Peer Review Heritage Conservation Areas - North
File: CY00318/2 Vide: NM.2
|
|
Notice of Motion from Councillor Malicki dated 2 December 2011
Numerous studies have been conducted in Ku-ring-gai Council over many years to ascertain the cultural significance of heritage conservation areas. The most recent studies undertaken for the northern areas of Ku-ring-gai are the Paul Davies Pty Ltd (2008) Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Heritage Conservation Area Review and the Paul Davies Pty Ltd (2010) Northern Heritage Conservation Area Review.
Whilst each study reviewed areas previously identified in other studies as potential heritage conservation areas, in particular the Urban Conservation Areas Studies undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan from 2001-2005.
It is suggested that Council engage an independent consultant to peer review the work of the recently completed HCA North for the following precincts:
o Pymble Avenue both sides from the top down to house # 69 ( just over the hill which climbs up from the Rand intersection).
o Orinoco Street both sides.
o Livingstone Avenue both sides from junction with top of Orinoco down to house numbers 77A and 80 ( just past junction with Penrhyn).
o Area bounded by Avon Road, Linden Avenue, Beechworth Road and Railway (includes Avon Road, Avon Close, Lonsdale Avenue, Barclay Close, Arilla Road, Mayfield Avenue, Allawah Road, Arden Road, Linden Close and Beechworth Road [in all cases both sides of the street including Avon Road (even though one side is currently PLC School]).
o Myoora plus Kimbarra both sides.
o Church St - Continuation to Mona Vale Road (both sides), including the Bird Sanctuary and Orana/Kwyong Ave loop
o Wellesley Road - Continuation to Church Street (both sides)
o King Edward Street (between Station & Church Street) - Include opposite side
o Mocatta Avenue - Include opposite side
o Station Street (between Grandview Street and Church Street) - Both sides
o Mona Vale Road - Both sides, between Mona Vale Road & Dalrymple-Hay Forest
o Telegraph Road - Both sides, between Pacific Highway and Mona Vale Road.
o Hillview precinct Turramurra.
The Review would include:
• A re-assessment of the significance for each potential heritage conservation area in accordance with Burra Charter’ and the associated ‘Guidelines’ and the NSW Heritage Office ‘Heritage Manual and NSW Heritage Manual guidelines.
• Review the description of each potential heritage conservation area and the street/property surveys of each street listing of contributing, neutral and uncharacteristic areas.
• Review of the boundaries of each heritage conservation area with specific recommendations for any amendments and or new proposed heritage conservation areas.
I move that:
"A. Council engage an independent heritage consultant to review the Heritage Conservation areas for the North.
B. That the findings be reported back to Council and incorporated into the Principal LEP.
C. That $80,000 be allocated to the project.”
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Szatow)
That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
Standing Orders were suspended to deal with items
where there are speakers and to discuss Items -
GB.15 - Planning Proposal - Amendment to KPSO Suspension of Covenants Clause
and NM.1 - Council's Notification Development Control Plan (DCP 56) together
which was moved by Councillors Malicki and McDonald and was
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
GENERAL BUSINESS (cont)
441 |
East Roseville Bowling Club - Lease to Club
File: S07451 Vide: GB.1
The following members of the public addressed Council:
P Goodwin R Parks P Lewis
|
|
To advise Council of progress, following the recent site inspection, legal advice and further discussions with the East Roseville Bowling Club (the Club), regarding the site lease and the options to resolve the current tenancy of the greenkeeper caretaker’s cottage (the cottage) on the site.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Mayor, Councillor J Anderson/Councillor Duncombe)
A. That
Council not grant the East Roseville Bowling Club a whole of site lease at
B. That the Club provide evidence to Council that the tenant Greenkeeper is a Club employee and providing green keeping and/or security work duties, and the cottage is complying with residential building rental standards under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 and the Building Code of Australia. Should this not occur, any occupation of the cottage until rezoning, reclassification and subdivision must be a Club employee, and the occupation must be with the Council’s agreement, and the occupation must be complying with residential building rental standards under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 and the Building Code of Australia.
C. That Council request the Club agree to terminate the cottage’s illegal tenancy agreement at the Club’s earliest opportunity, but by June 30 2012, and for Council to prepare enter into a residential tenancy agreement with the employee providing green keeping and/or security work duties and whose occupation complies with the residential building rental standards under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 and the Building Code of Australia and for the Club retain the cottage’s tenancy rental income until rezoned.
D. That Council excise the cottage and its curtilage situate at 47 Warrane Road, East Roseville from the whole of the site.
E. That Council subdivide the cottage and its curtilage of 47 Warrane Road, East Roseville from Lot 33 in DP 3285 with a minimum lot size and a minimum street frontage of 18 metres.
F. That Council in accordance with Part 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (as amended) rezone the residential portion of 47 Warrane Road, East Roseville to R2 Low Density Residential in the draft Ku-ring-gai Principal Local Environmental Plan.
G. That East Roseville Bowling Club pay the revised rental amount of $10,974 per year. The Club will also retain the income from the caretaker's cottage until the land is reclassified.
H. That after the cottage’s rezoning, reclassification and subdivision, Council agree in principle to a 50/50 agreement of the cottage’s net rental income sharing with the Club and that a further report be brought to Council to consider these partnership arrangements with the Club on the income and costs, to bring the cottage building up to residential rental standards under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 and the Building Code of Australia.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson, Councillors Duncombe, Hardwick, Holland, Keays, McDonald, Szatow, Hall and Cross
Against the Resolution: Councillor Malicki
|
442 |
Temporary Licences to Community Properties
File: S03076 Vide: GB.2
The following members of the public addressed the Council:
T Tait K Wells
|
|
To seek approval from Council for the issue of 12 months Temporary Licence Agreements for five (5) user groups under Council’s Policy for the Management of Community and Recreation Land and Facilities.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Keays/Szatow)
A. That Council resolve to grant the 12 months Temporary Licence Agreements to Lorna Hodgkinson Sunshine Home for Hamilton Park Building (1 Barellan Avenue, Turramurra) in accordance with Council’s adopted Policy for the Management of Community and Recreation Land and Facilities.
B. That Council resolve to grant the 12 months Temporary Licence Agreements to Lifeline for Princes Park Building (Polding Road, West Lindfield) in accordance with Council’s adopted Policy for the Management of Community and Recreation Land and Facilities.
C. That Council resolve to grant the 12 months Temporary licence Agreements to The Shed for Howson Oval Clubhouse Building, Turramurra in accordance with Council’s adopted Policy for the Management of Community and Recreation L and and Facilities.
D. That Council resolve to grant the 12 months Temporary Licence Agreements to Permaculture North for the vacant office at Lindfield Seniors Centre in accordance with Council’s adopted Policy for the Management of Community and Recreation L and and Facilities.
E. That Council resolve to grant the 12 months Temporary Licence Agreements to the NSW Department of Education and Commerce for part of Koola Reserve in accordance with Council’s adopted Policy for the Management of Community and Recreation L and and Facilities.
F. The
General Manager and Mayor to sign and affix Council’s Seal to the
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
443 |
Planning Proposal to rezone land at 1 Suakin Street, Pymble
File: S09007 Vide: GB.14
The following member of the public addressed Council:
G De Chalain
|
|
For Council to consider a Planning Proposal to rezone land at 1 Suakin Street, Pymble to permit mixed use development.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Keays/McDonald)
A. That a Planning Proposal be prepared, in accordance with section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, to amend the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance 1971 to zone the Pymble Business Park to B7 Business Park consistent with the provision for the precinct contained in former Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Town Centres) 2010 (KLEP 2010). The Planning Proposal is also to include land to the west of West Street and Ryde Road currently zoned 3(b)-(B1) and not previously included in KLEP 2010 as shown in Attachment A3 to the report.
B. That the Planning Proposal by submitted to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure for a gateway determination in accordance with section 56 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979.
C. That upon receipt of a Gateway Determination, the exhibition and consultation process is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and with the Gateway Determination requirements.
D. That a report be brought back to Council at the conclusion of the exhibition period.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
|
The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson declared a
potential pecuniary interest in respect of the following item -
GB.15 - Planning Proposal - Amendment to KPSO
Suspension of Covenants Clause and to item - NM.1 - Council's
Notification Development Control Plan (DCP 56)
and vacated the Chair and withdrew
from the Chamber taking no part
in discussion and voting on the items
The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Elaine Malicki assumed the Chair
Councillor Hall departed
444 |
Planning Proposal - Amendment to KPSO Suspension of Covenants Clause
File: S04601 Vide: GB.15
The following members of the public addressed the Council:
L Heiler I Glendinning M Kimber Y Kimber
|
|
For Council to consider initiating a planning proposal to amend the suspension of covenants clause in the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance (KPSO).
During Debate on the Item, Councillor Duncombe was called to Order
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Cross/Malicki)
A. That Council, in accordance with section 56 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 submit the attached planning proposal to the Department of Planning and Infrastructure (DOPI) to allow a suspension of covenants, agreements and instruments clause to be included into the KPSO.
B. That upon receipt of a Gateway determination, the exhibition and consultation process is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and with the gateway Determination requirements.
C. That a report be brought back to Council at the conclusion of the exhibition period.
For the Resolution: Councillors Duncombe, Hardwick, Holland, Malicki, McDonald and Cross
Against the Resolution: Councillors Keays and Szatow
|
Motions of which due Notice has been given (cont)
445 |
Heritage Properties
File: CY00318/2 Vide: NM.3
|
|
A significant number of heritage properties are potentially under threat in the LGA, because there is currently no LEP to protect them.
At present Council must submit an Interim Heritage Order (IHO) to The Minister, which process often incurs debilitating delays.
The Heritage Act empowers individual Councils with Ministerial approval, to make IHO's.
I move that:
"This Council seeks delegation from The Minister for Heritage to make IHO's for properties in Ku-ring-gai under threat of harm under the following conditions:
1. Where a property which has been reviewed as part of a heritage review process and has been assessed as having local heritage significance and where Council intends to prepare an LEP which will protect that heritage item.
2. For properties listed as heritage items in the 2010 Town Centres LEP which are not currently listed, due to it being declared invalid.
3. When Council is aware a Complying Development Certificate for demolition has been issued and believes a property has local heritage significance.
Delegation to issue an IHO to go to the General Manager or Acting General Manager so that an IHO may be issued without delay."
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Keays)
That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present |
446 |
Council's Notification Development Control Plan (DCP 56)
File: S04190 Vide: NM.1
|
|
Concerns have been raised that Council’s Notification Development Control plan (DCP 56) is unnecessarily onerous for development applications involving works to heritage items or in urban conservation areas. For Type F developments DCP 56 specifies that the application be placed on public exhibition for 30 days as follows:
· the six (6) adjoining and neighbouring properties on each side and the fourteen (14) adjoining properties to the front and rear of the development site be notified in writing
· that a notification sign be placed at the street frontage
· that a notice be published in a newspaper circulating in the locality
These requirements which are the same for residential flat buildings are the most comprehensive in the DCP and are an unreasonable financial burden for this scale of development. The newspaper advertising requirement currently amounts to $1,105.00 over and above the statutory DA application fee and other disbursements.
I propose that the requirement for publication in the local newspaper be removed but that all other notification requirements remain as per Notification Type F in Council’s Notification Development Control plan (DCP 56).
I move:
"A. That Council's Notification Development Plan (DCP 56) be amended so that Development Applications for heritage items and for items within Heritage Conservation Areas (described as UCA's in the DCP) no longer require advertising in the newspaper - a saving of some $1,105.00 for applicants.
B. That the amendments to Council’s Notification Development Control plan (DCP 56) be placed on public exhibition in accordance with the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 for a period of 28 days and a report be brought back to Council at the completion of the exhibition process."
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Keays)
That the above Notice of Motion, as amended, be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present |
The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson returned
and assumed the Chair
Councillor Cross withdrew
GENERAL BUSINESS (cont)
447 |
National Trust Heritage Festival 2012 - Sponsorship Proposal
File: S02792 Vide: GB.4
|
|
To advise Council of a request from the National Trust of Australia for sponsorship for the National Trust Heritage Festival 2012, by placing a half page advertisement in the festival program.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Keays/McDonald)
That Council consider the sponsorship proposal from the National Trust of Australia for $3,200 to advertise in the 2012 National Trust Heritage Festival program.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present
|
Councillor Cross returned
448 |
Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra - Sponsorship Proposal - 2012
File: FY00275/4 Vide: GB.5
|
|
To advise Council of a sponsorship proposal from the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra (KPO).
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Keays/Szatow)
That Council renew its sponsorship of the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra for $25,000 in 2012 in order to contribute to the funding of the 40th Anniversary historical publication.
For the Resolution: The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson, Councillors Duncombe, Hardwick, Holland, Keays, McDonald, Szatow and Cross
Against the Resolution: Councillor Malicki
The above Resolution was subject to an Amendment which was LOST. The Lost Amendment was:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Cross)
That Council renew its sponsorship to the Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra for $20,000 in 2012.
|
449 |
Central Coast Bears - Request for Foundation Sponsorship
File: CY00050/3 Vide: GB.6
|
|
To advise Council of a sponsorship request from the Central Coast Bears Rugby League Club.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Duncombe/McDonald)
That Council receive and note the sponsorship request.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present
|
450 |
Bicycle Reference Committee - Notes of Meeting held 16 November 2011
File: S02696 Vide: GB.18
|
|
To bring to the attention of Council the proceedings of the Bicycle Reference Committee meeting held on Wednesday, 16 November 2011.
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Holland/Malicki)
A. That the notes and attachments of the Bicycle Reference Committee meeting held on Wednesday 16 November 2011 be received and noted.
B. That Lyness Beavis and Ian Jackson be appointed to the Bicycle Reference Committee.
C. That the Bicycle Reference Committee charter be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present |
Motions of which due Notice has been given (cont)
451 |
Economic & Social Development
File: S08061 Vide: NM.4
|
|
Notice of Motion from Councillor Duncombe dated 5 December 2011
In 2009, Council commissioned consultants AEC Group to undertake an Economic Development Strategy for the organisation.
The study was premised on opportunities for the Council to strengthen its own financial capacity in the long term. More broadly, it analysed ways by which Council could play a more proactive role to engage with local business and other relevant stakeholders to enhance the economic capacity of the area as a whole.
In August 2011, AEG Group provided Council with a final recommendations paper. The content of this paper was broadly discussed at the most recent Councillors workshop.
Council currently has a budget allocation of approximately $200,000. One of the key recommendations from the study is that Council recruit for an Economic and Business Development Manager to act as a conduit between Council and local businesses.
A key component of this role is to implement the draft Economic and Business Development proposed by AEC Group, which can be refined and modified over time, based on future staff reports and recommendations to Council.
As the role will require interaction with all departments across Council, it is proposed that the role report directly to the General Manager.
This Notice of Motion if supported, does not commit Council to the actual recommendations contained within the study. It merely provides a direction for Council to commence the process of Economic and Social Development.
If, at a point in the future, specific recommendations are to be progressed, they would require separate reports to Council for approval.
I move that:
"A. That the General Manager develop a position description for an Economic Development Manager. The position description is to reflect the draft Economic and Business development program.
B. That a formalised program budget be developed and reported back to Council in February 2012 together with the position description and the full AEC Group report."
|
|
Resolved:
(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Holland)
That the above Notice of Motion, as amended, be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY by those present
|
Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS
An Inspections Committee will take place at the following property:
The Glade, Wahroonga
The Director Strategy and Environment will notify Councillors of the date, time and rendezvous.
The Meeting closed at 10.01pm
The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 13 December 2011 (Pages 1 - 94) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 7 February 2012.
__________________________ __________________________
General Manager Mayor / Chairperson
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.1 / 96 |
|
|
Item GB.1 |
S02046 |
|
6 January 2012 |
Australian Local Government Women's Association (NSW) 59th Annual Conference March 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Report
To advise Councillors of the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (NSW) Annual Conference to be held in Dubbo on 22-24 March 2012.
Background
The theme for the conference is “Creators of Change”, women in local government. The draft program is attached (Attachment 1)
Comments
The annual ALGWA conference provides a platform for councillors and staff to gather to discuss current and emerging issues facing women in local government. An impressive line-up of speakers has been arranged for 2012. Each presenter will bring to the conference stories of how they have created change in their work place or in the community they live.
The Creators of Change conference will help inspire and empower elected members and staff who collectively represent 27 percent of local government in New South Wales.
Governance Matters
The Policy on Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.
Risk Management
Not applicable.
Financial Considerations
The cost of attending the ICTC Conference is $540.00 per delegate. Airfares and accommodation costs will be additional.
Social Considerations
Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable.
Community Consultation
No community consultation was undertaken in the writing of the report.
Internal Consultation
No internal consultation was undertaken in the writing of the report
Summary
The annual LGWA Conference is being held in Dubbo on 22-24 March 2012. The theme for the conference is “Creators of Change”, women in local government. The registration fee for the conference is $540.00 per delegate plus additional travel and accommodation costs.
That any Councillors interested in attending the Australian Local Government Women’s Association (NSW) Annual Conference in Dubbo on 22 to 24 March 2012, advise the General Manager by Friday, 10 February 2012. |
Janice Bevan Director Community |
|
A1View |
ALGWA Conference Program and Registration information |
|
2012/010258 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.2 / 111 |
|
|
Item GB.2 |
S02046 |
|
13 January 2012 |
Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) Tourism Conference 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of the Local Government and Shires Association of NSW (LGSA) 2012 Tourism Conference. |
|
|
background: |
The Conference is to be held in Gunnedah from |
|
|
comments: |
The theme for the 2012 Conference is “Check in or Check out!” Does your service meet your visitors’ expectations? The draft program is attached to this report. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That any Councillors interested in attending the LGSA 2012 Tourism Conference advise the General Manager by Friday 10 February. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of the Local Government and Shires Association of NSW (LGSA) 2012 Tourism Conference.
Background
The Conference is to be held in Gunnedah from 12 – 14 March 2012.
Comments
The theme for the 2012 Conference is “Check in or Check out!” Does your service meet your visitors’ expectations?
The Conference will address tourism issues pertinent to elected representatives, council staff and industry professionals. Actual local government case studies will be discussed and there will be opportunities to network with other Councillors and tourism professionals, as well as meet and talk with staff from Tourism NSW and the directors of the Tourism Industry Council.
There will be a diverse range of speakers and a number of site inspections relative to the program. (see attachment)
The Conference is designed for Mayors, Councillors, General Managers and anyone working in or with Local Government whose role involves: tourism promotion and development, economic development, marketing, special events, media, community strategic planning, town planning and cultural services, and infrastructure provision.
Governance Matters
The Policy on Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.
Risk Management
Not applicable
Financial Considerations
The registration fee for the Conference is $660.00 per delegate. Travel and accommodation costs will be additional.
Social Considerations
Not applicable
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable
Community Consultation
Not applicable
Internal Consultation
Not applicable
Summary
The LGSA 2012 Tourism Conference will be held in Gunnedah from 12-14 March. The theme for the conference is “Check in or Check out!” Does your service meet your visitors’ expectations? The registration for the conference is $660.00 per delegate, plus additional travel and accommodation costs.
That any Councillors interested in attending the Local Government and Shires Association (NSW) 2012 Tourism Conference in Gunnedah from 12 to 14 March advise the General Manager by Friday, 10 February.
|
Janice Bevan Director Community |
|
A1View |
LGSA Tourism Conference 12-14 March 2012 at Gunnedah Civic Centre Hosted by Gunnedah Shire Council - Program |
|
2011/285368 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - LGSA Tourism Conference 12-14 March 2012 at Gunnedah Civic Centre Hosted by Gunnedah Shire Council - Program |
|
Item No: GB.2 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.3 / 119 |
|
|
Item GB.3 |
FY00275/4 |
|
17 January 2012 |
Proposal for Ku-ring-gai Financial Services to sponsor Ku-ring-gai Council's Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of an expression of interest received from Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd (trading as Turramurra Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank and Lindfield Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank) to sponsor Ku-ring-gai Council’s Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program. |
|
|
background: |
Ku-ring-gai Council’s Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program provides grants of up to $5,000 to local community groups to buy equipment, improve their service or fund new initiatives to benefit Ku-ring-gai. Each year a significant amount of applications for the program are turned away or cut back due to budget restraints. |
|
|
comments: |
Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd is proposing to sponsor the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program for $75,000 a year for three years in return for mutually agreed branding and marketing opportunities. The sponsorship would allow Council to extend its grants program by increasing the number of grants given to community groups. It would also fund a presentation evening for recipients. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council accept Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd‘s proposal to sponsor the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program for 2012, 2013 and 2014. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of an expression of interest received from Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd (trading as Turramurra Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank and Lindfield Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank) to sponsor Ku-ring-gai Council’s Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program.
Background
Ku-ring-gai Council’s Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program provides grants of up to $5,000 to local community groups to buy equipment, improve their service or fund new initiatives to benefit Ku-ring-gai. Each year a significant amount of applications for the program are turned away or cut back due to budget restraints.
Comments
About the sponsorship proposal
Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd (KFSL) is proposing to sponsor the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program 2012 for $75,000 in return for mutually agreed branding and marketing opportunities.
This would include logos on promotional materials, joint media releases, links on website, stories about the sponsorship and grants program in Council publications, speeches at presentation evenings and the opportunity to promote their services to grant applicants.
The sponsorship would allow Council to extend its grants program by increasing the number of grants given to community groups. It would also fund a presentation evening for recipients.
The sponsorship also provides the opportunity to refresh the grants program, provide networking opportunities for community groups and increase the profile of the program among the Ku-ring-gai community.
About Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd
KFSL is a public company with more than 500 shareholders mainly drawn from the Ku-ring-gai community. It was formed in December 2002 with a mission to establish a Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank to preserve the continuation of banking services in Turramurra. This was a time of wide-spread bank closures, with 13 bank closures in Ku-ring-gai from 1998 to 2002.
Turramurra Community Bank opened in 2003 and has achieved a total portfolio of more than $200 million with almost 3,500 customers, mostly local residents. KFSL recently expanded opening a second community branch in Lindfield 2011.
Community Bank branches provide employment opportunities for local people, keep local capital in the community, are a local investment option for shareholders and provide a source of funding for important community projects determined by the local community.
Since its inception KFSL has returned $1 million to the Ku-ring-gai community through financial support of local community groups and organisations in the form of grants, sponsorships and donations; and direct dividend returns to local shareholders.
KFSL supports many local community groups and projects including Turramurra Community Garden, Ku-ring-gai Meals on Wheels, Ku-ring-gai Community Workshop at St Ives Showground and has donated money towards the new State Emergency Service and Rural Fire Service headquarters in Wahroonga. See Attachment A for more information.
Governance Matters
The sponsorship proposal complies with Council’s Sponsorship and Donations Policy.
Risk Management
If KFSL or its branches fall into disrepute, Council’s reputation could suffer by association. However the banks currently have an excellent record for their community sponsorships.
Financial Considerations
The sponsorship would provide Council with income of $75,000 per year for three years to extend the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program.
Social Considerations
The sponsorship would allow Council to provide more grants to Ku-ring-gai community groups, who in turn will provide extra services to the Ku-ring-gai community.
Environmental Considerations
All marketing collateral produced under the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program will be printed waterless on recycled paper. Potentially some of the projects funded under the program would provide environmental benefit to the Ku-ring-gai community.
Community Consultation
Ku-ring-gai Council called for expressions of interest from 18 November to 16 December 2011 for interested sponsors of the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program. It was advertised in the North Shore Times and on Council’s website www.kmc.nsw.gov.au .
Internal Consultation
The Community and Civic departments were consulted about this sponsorship proposal.
Summary
Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd is proposing to sponsor the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program for $75,000 a year for three years in return for mutually agreed branding and marketing opportunities.
The sponsorship would allow Council to extend its grants program by increasing the number of grants given to community groups. It would also fund a presentation evening for recipients and provide an opportunity to raise the profile of the program.
KFSL have an excellent record of community sponsorships and the proposal complies with Council’s Sponsorship and Donations Policy.
That Council accept the Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd’s proposal to sponsor the Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program for 2012, 2013 and 2014. |
Tiffiny Kellar Manager Communications |
Janice Bevan Director Community |
A1View |
Turramurra and Lindfield Community Banks expression of interest submission for sponsorship of 2012 Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program |
|
2011/284754 |
|
|
A2View |
Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Limited Annual Report |
|
2011/284757 |
|
A3View |
Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Limited Newsletter- December 2011 |
|
2011/284759 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - Turramurra and Lindfield Community Banks expression of interest submission for sponsorship of 2012 Financial Assistance to Community Groups Program |
|
Item No: GB.3 |
Expression of Interest
by
Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Limited (KFSL) trading as
Turramurra Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank
&
Lindfield Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank
for
Sponsorship of Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (KMC) Community Groups Program
16th December 2011
1. Introduction
Ku-ring-gai Financial Services Ltd (KFSL) trading as Turramurra Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank and Lindfield Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank, has prepared this submission in response to Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (KMC) request for sponsorship of its 2012 Financial Assistance to Community Groups program, as publicised on the KMC website.
KFSL proposes to enter a three (3) year sponsor ship of the KMC Financial Commitment to Community Groups Program. The proposed sponsorship amount is up to $75,000 per annum for each of the three years.
In return for this sponsorship KFSL expects the following benefits
i. Joint recognition with KMC including joint press releases
ii. Naming Rights for the program and projects conducted under the program
iii. Branding opportunities
iv. Opportunities to build relationships through access to recipient membership for purpose of communication and advertising by direct mail and postings on their web sites & social media
v. Joint press releases
vi. Recipients consider conducting their banking at our branches.
vii. Participate in the assessment and selection of successful recipients
viii. Web site links
Additional direct support can be provided to recipients through provision of merchant facilities for registration days and other significant events.
Advantages and Benefits to KMC
KFSL has an excellent record of directly supporting the Ku-ring-gai community which has been achieved over just 8 years
Experience, enthusiasm and dedication to developing and conducting successful grants programs over the past 3 years. This program has also provided a forum for Community groups to interface and network, resulting in several new beneficial relationships being established.
Building on successful partnership programs targeted at building community capacity within Ku-ring-gai, including:
· Turramurra Lookout Community Garden project;
· The Shed (Ku-ring-gai Mens Shed) project;
· Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Community Transport project; and
· SES/RFS New Headquarters project (Hero HQ)
Special conditions
KFSL to be the only financial services institution involved in the program
Formally review the operation of the program after the first year
In the event of a conflict of interest (eg another financial services institution is already a sponsor of an organisation) the issues are to be highlighted and resolved in a professional manner
Recipients are consistent with KFSL sponsorship Policy
3. Background to KFSL
a. Introduction
KFSL was formed in December 2002 with a mission to establish a Community Bank Branch of Bendigo Bank and thereby preserve the continuation of banking services in Turramurra.
This was a time of wide-spread bank closures by the existing banks which resulted in 13 bank closures in Ku-ring-gai during the period around 1998 - 2002.
b. History
Our Turramurra Community Bank opened for business in October 2003. Since that time, the Turramurra Community Bank branch has achieved a Total Portfolio of more than $200 million of banking business and now provides high quality and friendly banking and other financial services to almost 3,500 customers comprising mostly local residents.
Indeed, the Turramurra Community Bank is widely recognised as one of the most successful of Bendigo Bank’s network of 280+ community-owned Community Bank branches, and continues to be one of the fastest-growing Community Bank branches.
The recent opening of our 2nd Community Bank branch in Lindfield means that KFSL can now provide our superior banking services to Ku-ring-gai residents from Wahroonga to Roseville.
c. Community Shareholders
KFSL initial Prospectus in 2003 raised $924,000 in share capital from almost 400 shareholders, mostly drawn from the Turramurra and Wahroonga / Warrawee suburbs.
Our recent so-called Lindfield Prospectus has thus-far raised almost $400,000 from more than 130 new shareholders, mostly drawn from Roseville / Lindfield / Killara suburbs. Accordingly, KFSL is now has more than 500 shareholders drawn from across a large portion of Ku-ring-gai.
4. Aims and Objectives of KFSL (what we say we will Do)
a. KFSL Mission Statement
Our mission is: “ to build and grow a successful community based bank which delivers excellent customer service, stimulates local business and returns profits to our community”
Making direct returns to the communities we service is an integral part of the KFSL Charter. Section 5 outlines the practical ways in which we do this.
b. Bendigo Community Banking Concept
The Community Bank® initiative continues to resonate with customers and their communities more than a decade after it was first introduced.
Community Bank® branches and Bendigo Bank provide communities with more than just high quality banking services – they deliver employment opportunities for local people, keep local capital in the community, are a local investment option for shareholders and provide a source of funding for important community projects determined by the local community.
5. KFSL Community Support ( What we Do)
a. $1million back to community
Since the inception of KFSL and the opening of the Turramurra Community Bank Branch in 2003 over $1 million dollars has been returned to the Ku-ring-gai community, through
· financial support of local community groups and organisations in the form of grants; sponsorships and donations; and
· direct dividend returns to local shareholders
b. Community Support Strategy
Community Support Strategy is developed each year and 2011 is attached for your reference. The focus of the program is to embrace all parts of the Ku-ring-gai community including Youth; Families; Seniors.
Furthermore we recognise that successful community partnerships are critical to the creation of real value to the community. Key identified partners include Council; Service groups (such as Rotary); the club organisations and volunteers.
c. Who we are supporting
i. Community Capacity & Infrastructure Building
· State Emergency Services (SES)
· Rural Fire Service (RFS)
· Hero HQ (RFS & SES)
· Turramurra Lookout Community Garden - Foundation Sponsor
· The Shed (Ku-ring-gai mens Shed) - Foundation Sponsor
· Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Community Transport
· Various Schools and Preschools
· Turramurra Rotary Graffiti removal project and pilot
· Easy Care gardening
· Meals on Wheels
ii. Sport and Recreation
· Bowling Clubs ( Turramurra; Lindfield; Warrawee; Gordon; West Pymble; East Roseville; Killara)
· Kissing Point Sports Club (Football; Cricket; Baseball)
· Ku-ring-gai Netball Association
· Ku-ring-gai Stealers Baseball
· Lindfield Football Club
· West Pymble Football Club disabled player program
· Killara West Pymble Rugby
· Scouts (various)
· Guides ( various)
· Step Inc
· Pharmacy Cricket
· Gordon Netball Club
iii. Cultural
· Ku-ring-gai Art Society
· Ku-ring-gai Youth Orchestra & Scholarship program
· Ku-ring-gai Philharmonic Orchestra
iv. Business
· Ku-ring-gai Business Forum (KBF)
KFSL organises 2 or 3 Ku-ring-gai Business Forum events each year. These events provide opportunities for local businesses to engage with each other and to provide valuable insights to benefit their business endeavours.
We have been successful in being able to attract a wide range of outstanding speakers to these events including:
Ric Battelino, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank;
Hugh Mackay, Social Commentator; Sporting personalities – Nick Farr-Jones & Liz Ellis; and Political Leaders from State and Local Government
· Network North
v. Donations to Worthy Community causes
· Ku-ring-gai Youth Development Service (KYDS) various initiatives
· Lifeline Harbour to Hawkesbury direct support in training counsellors in Depression Management.
· Michelle’s Backyard Blitz
· SHHH Australia Inc
· Valmas Pets for Therapy
· Trish Foundation
· Porche’s Animal Rescue
· Ku-ring-gai Lantern Society
· Lifestart Cooperative
vi. Building Community Leaders
· KFSL Directors build additional skills and capabilities as directors which they can use to assist the community.
· Youth observer program
Since 2005 KFSL has provided two students from the Turramurra High School (THS) with an opportunity to gain exposure and insights into the running of a public company. As an integral part of this program, our Youth Observers attend all of our Board Meetings and all of our business and social functions.
This program also encourages and helps to prepare the participants to serve their community on a voluntary basis in the future and develops a stronger sense of community spirit.
In 2011 two students from Killara High School were added to the program
· Rotary Youth Leadership (RYLA)
In partnership with both Lindfield and Turramurra Rotary Clubs, KFSL has funded attendees to the annual RYLA program
6. Compliance with KMC Sponsorship Policy
a. KFSL has reviewed the KMC sponsorship guidelines, and believes that it is compliant with the established guidelines.
7. Experience in conducting Grants programs
a. Over the last 3 years KFSL has conducted its own successful grants programs in 2008; 2009; 2010 . While no program was conducted in calendar 2011 due to the work load involved in establishing our new branch in Lindfield, we are planning to run our 2011/12 grants program in the first half of 2012.
b. The Grants program to the value of $25000; $50000; and $50000 respectively, has enabled recipients to fund specific projects or provide seed funding and support which enables additional support to be secured
c. Our successful formula for conducting our grants program has evolved which includes the following steps
i. Grant information evening
ii. Grant application
iii. Assessment of applications
iv. Grants award evening.
d. Both the Information evening and the Grants award night have provided opportunities for like-minded community volunteers to share experiences and make valuable connections to leverage the various projects and capacity that exists.
e. The grants program has resulted in stronger engagement of our Ku-ring-gai community.
Attachments
· KFSL Community Investment Strategy
· KFSL Annual Report
· KFSL Lindfield Community Bank Branch Prospectus
· Newsletters
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.4 / 177 |
|
|
Item GB.4 |
S09137 |
|
16 January 2012 |
Constitutional Recognition of Local Government -
Request for Contribution of Funds
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To consider the request from the Local Government and Shires Association of NSW for a financial contribution towards a national advertising campaign to raise public support for the constitutional recognition of Local Government. |
|
|
background: |
The Local Government and Shires Association of NSW have written to Council requesting for a contribution of funds towards a national advertising campaign. The objective of the campaign is to raise the profile of the constitutional recognition of Local Government with the general public in the event of a referendum that is expected to be held in 2013. |
|
|
comments: |
A special levy of $29,471.68 plus GST payable over three (3) years has been requested as Ku-ring-gai Council’s financial contribution towards a national advertising campaign for constitutional recognition of Local Government. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council considers whether to pay the special levy. |
Purpose of Report
To consider the request from the Local Government and Shires Association of NSW for a financial contribution towards a national advertising campaign to raise public support for the constitutional recognition of Local Government.
Background
The Local Government and Shires Association of NSW (LGSA) have written to Council (see attachment A1) with an update on the progress made by the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) for achieving constitutional recognition of local government and a request for a contribution of funds towards a national advertising campaign. The objective of the campaign is to raise the profile of the constitutional recognition of local government with the general public in the event of a referendum which is expected to be held in 2013.
The ALGA has devoted considerable resources over the past three (3) years to developing the case for constitutional reform. Following the 2010 Federal Election, Prime Minister Julia Gillard committed to holding a dual referendum on the constitutional recognition of local government and the recognition of Indigenous Australians. The referendum will most likely be held in conjunction with the 2013 Federal Election. In mid 2011 the Prime Minister set up an Expert Panel on constitutional recognition of local government. The Expert Panel released its findings on 22 December 2011 (see attachment A2).
The ALGA are asking all State and Territory Associations and their member councils to contribute financially to a large scale national advertising campaign to gain public support for a ‘yes vote’ when the time for a referendum comes. In order for the referendum to be successful it requires a ‘double majority’, which is a majority of ‘yes votes’ from a majority of voters, and a majority of states. As NSW is the most populated state success in NSW is considered critical to the success of the national campaign.
The ALGA’s planning for this national campaign is in the early stages, however it is known that substantial funds will be required. From previous ALGA research it is estimated that the national advertising campaign will cost in excess of $10 million, and that NSW Councils, based on size and population, will be expected to contribute approximately $2.7 million of this amount. This will be contributed to ALGA through the LGSA to coordinate the campaign.
At the December 2011 LGSA board meeting it was agreed that $1 million was to be allocated over the next two (2) financial years on NSW specific ‘profile raising’ and promotional activities, in addition to the national advertising campaign. It was also resolved that the $2.7 million required by the ALGA for the campaign be sought from members by way of a special levy. Each council’s share of the levy will be payable in three (3) equal instalments over a three (3) year period, commencing 1 July 2012. The special levy has been calculated using the standard formula used when calculating other similar levies, such as legal assistance calls. Ku-ring-gai Council’s special levy was calculated to be $29,471.68 plus GST.
Council considered and passed the following resolution at its meeting of 22 March 2011:
“Ku-ring-gai Council declares its support for financial recognition of local government in the Australian constitution so that the Federal Government has the power to fund local government directly and also for inclusion of local government in any new Preamble to the Constitution if one is proposed, and calls on all political parties to support a referendum by 2013 to change the Constitution to achieve this recognition”.
Comments
A special levy of $29,471.68 plus GST payable over three (3)
years has been requested as
Ku-ring-gai Council’s financial contribution towards a national advertising
campaign.
Governance Matters
A High Court decision in 2009 in Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation sets out the limitations of the Australian Federal Government’s powers and, in doing so, clearly indicated that the Australian Government does not have the power to fund local government directly.
Constitutional reform and the recognition of local government would allow the Australian Government to directly fund local government to achieve national objectives and it is considered in the best interests of local communities to do so.
Risk Management
If Council’s response to the request for a financial contribution was not agreed to there is a potential moderate risk to Council in regards to Council’s reputation if this was negatively perceived by the community.
Financial Considerations
The ALGA’s planning for this national campaign is in the early stages, however it is known that substantial funds will be required. From previous ALGA research it is estimated that the national advertising campaign will cost in excess of $10 million, and that NSW Councils, based on size and population, will be expected to contribute approximately $2.7 million of this amount. This will be contributed to ALGA through the LGSA to coordinate the campaign.
A special levy of $29,471.68 plus GST payable over three (3)
years has been requested as
Ku-ring-gai Council’s financial contribution towards a national advertising
campaign.
If Council approves the payment of this special levy, funding will need to be allocated in the Operational Plan 2012/2013 and Delivery Program 2013 – 2016.
Social Considerations
The issue of constitutional recognition of Local Government not only encompasses social considerations within the Ku-ring-gai local government area but it also needs to be considered at a national level. The ALGA’s opinion is that it is in the best interests of local communities that Federal Governments, whatever their political persuasion, have the capacity to fund councils directly to achieve national objectives.
The ALGA has been devoting considerable resources to this issue since 2010. If Council’s response to the request for a financial contribution was not agreed to this would negatively affect the ALGA’s campaign.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations in respect of this report.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Summary
That Council considers whether to pay the special levy.
A. That Council considers whether to pay the special levy.
B. That if Council approves the payment of the special levy, funding be allocated in the Operational Plan 2012/2013 and Delivery Program 2013 - 2016. |
Matt Ryan Manager Governance & Records |
Tino Caltabiano Acting Director Corporate |
A1View |
Constitutional Recognition of Local Government - contribution of funds |
|
2012/008075 |
|
|
A2View |
Constitutional Recognition of Local Government - Final Report - December 2011 |
|
2012/011238 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - Constitutional Recognition of Local Government - contribution of funds |
|
Item No: GB.4 |
APPENDIX No: 2 - Constitutional Recognition of Local Government - Final Report - December 2011 |
|
Item No: GB.4 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.5 / 305 |
|
|
Item GB.5 |
S03158/2 |
|
17 January 2012 |
Local Government Remuneration Tribunal 2012 Review
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To consider making a submission to the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal in regards to the categories of councils under s. 240 of the Local Government Act 1993. |
|
|
background: |
The Local Government Remuneration Tribunal has written to Council advising that it is undertaking a review of the minimum and maximum fee levels for each category. Additionally the Tribunal is also reviewing the categories of councils in accordance with s. 239 of the Local Government Act 1993. The last review was completed in 2009. |
|
|
comments: |
The Tribunal is seeking comment on any significant changes that have occurred in the activities of Councils since the 2009 review. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council receive and note the letter from the Tribunal. |
Purpose of Report
To consider making a submission to the Local Government Remuneration Tribunal in regards to the categories of councils under s. 240 of the Local Government Act 1993.
Background
The Local Government Remuneration Tribunal is constituted in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993. The Tribunal is responsible for categorising each council, county council and mayoral office for the purpose of determining the minimum and maximum fees payable to councillors, member of county councils and mayors in each category. The Tribunal is required to make a determination by no later than 1 May each year. Annual determinations take effect from 1 July in that year.
The Local Government Remuneration Tribunal has written to Council (see Attachment A1) advising that it is undertaking a review of the minimum and maximum fee levels for each category. Additionally the Tribunal is also reviewing the categories of councils in accordance with s.239 of the Local Government Act 1993. The last review of categories was completed in 2009. The Tribunal requests individual Councils to make a submission if any significant changes have occurred in the activities of Council since the 2009 review. The Tribunal has also provided the opportunity for those Mayors and Councillors who may wish to address the Tribunal with regards to categorisation matters.
The Local Government Act 1993 outlines the requirements that the Tribunal must meet in regards to categorisation and fees for each Council. In accordance with s. 239 of the Act the Remuneration Tribunal must, at least once every three (3) years:
a. determine categories for councils and mayoral offices, and
b. place each council and mayoral office into one of the categories it has determined.
The determination of categories by the Remuneration Tribunal is for the purpose of enabling the Remuneration Tribunal to determine the maximum and minimum amounts of fees to be paid to mayors and councillors in each of the categories so determined. The Remuneration Tribunal is to determine categories for councils and mayoral offices according to those outlined in s. 240 of the Act. Those considerations are:
· The size of areas
· The physical terrain of areas
· The population of areas and the distribution of the population
· The nature and volume of business dealt with by each council
· The nature and extent of the development of areas
· The diversity of communities served
· The regional, national and international significance of the council
· Such matters as the Remuneration Tribunal considers relevant to the provision of efficient and effective local government
· Such other matters as may be prescribed by the regulations.
In accordance with s. 241 of the Act the Remuneration Tribunal must, not later than 1 May in each year, determine, in each of the categories determined under s. 239 of the Act, the maximum and minimum amounts of fees to be paid during the following year to councillors (other than mayors) and mayors.
The Tribunal last undertook a comprehensive review of the categories which was determined and reported on 29 April 2009 (see Attachment A2). This determination was based on submissions received from the Local Government and Shires Association (LGSA) and individual Councils, as well as advice received from the Division of Local Government. The Tribunal also considered the findings of previously held reviews. There are nine (9) categories that the Tribunal will categorise each Council into – Rural, Regional Rural, Metropolitan, Metropolitan Centres, Metropolitan Major, Major City, Principal City, County Councils and County Council – Water.
Ku-ring-gai Council was categorised as a metropolitan Council. Metropolitan Councils are characterised by having smaller populations, or in some cases smaller areas, than other Councils in the metropolitan region. The scale or diversity of operations is less than for the Councils classified as Metropolitan Centres. A total of 21 other Councils were categorised in 2009 as metropolitan including the Councils of Holroyd, Hunters Hill, Manly, Lane Cove, Pittwater and Kogarah.
In response to the 2009 review the Tribunal received 25 submissions from individual Councils, two combined submissions and a submission from the Local Government and Shires Association.
Having regard to these submissions and taken them into account the Tribunal found that there was no case to significantly alter the current categories of Councillor and Mayoral offices or to move individual Councils between categories.
The Tribunal is seeking comment on any significant changes that have occurred in the activities of Councils since the 2009 review.
Comments
At this point in time, on the basis of the categorisation criteria outlined in s. 240 of the Act, it would appear to be difficult to demonstrate that there has been significant change occurring at Ku-ring-gai in the last three (3) years that could justify a potential transfer into the Metropolitan Centres category. This category is comprised of some very large regional Councils like Bankstown, Liverpool, Baulkham Hills, Randwick, Sutherland and Gosford. These Councils are typically large multi-purpose organisations which serve as regional centres for the interests of a wider number of residents. They are characterised by large populations and large revenues. Council business may include significant infrastructure and support for commercial and retail facilities. They also have high population growth and urban residential development or host significant sports/recreational/cultural facilities and major education / health facilities.
Therefore without any significant changes occurring within Ku-ring-gai, in regards to the categorisation criteria, and along with the results of the 2009 review where zero number of Councils from 25 submissions were transferred into another category this report recommends not to make a submission to the Tribunal at this time.
Governance Matters
In accordance with s. 239 of the Act the Remuneration Tribunal must, at least once every three (3) years;
a. determine categories for councils and mayoral offices, and
b. place each council and mayoral office into one of the categories it has determined.
The determination of categories by the Remuneration Tribunal is for the purpose of enabling the Remuneration Tribunal to determine the maximum and minimum amounts of fees to be paid to mayors and councillors in each of the categories so determined.
The Remuneration Tribunal is to determine categories for councils and mayoral offices according to those outlined in s. 240 of the Act. These considerations are;
· The size of areas
· The physical terrain of areas
· The population of areas and the distribution of the population
· The nature and volume of business dealt with by each council
· The nature and extent of the development of areas
· The diversity of communities served
· The regional, national and international significance of the council
· Such matters as the Remuneration Tribunal considers relevant to the provision of efficient and effective local government
· Such other matters as may be prescribed by the regulations.
In accordance with s. 241 of the Act the Remuneration Tribunal must, not later than 1 May in each year, determine, in each of the categories determined under s. 239 of the Act, the maximum and minimum amounts of fees to be paid during the following year to councillors (other than mayors) and mayors.
Risk Management
There are no significant risks associated with this report.
Financial Considerations
There are no financial considerations associated with this report.
Social Considerations
There are no social considerations associated with this report.
Environmental Considerations
There are no environmental considerations associated with this report.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Summary
The Local Government Remuneration Tribunal has written to Council advising that it is undertaking a review of the minimum and maximum fee levels for each category. Additionally the Tribunal is also reviewing the categories of councils in accordance with s. 239 of the Local Government Act 1993. The last review was completed in 2009.
The Tribunal is seeking comment on any significant changes that have occurred in the activities of Councils since the 2009 review.
At this point in time, on the basis of the categorisation criteria outlined in s. 240 of the Act, it would appear to be difficult to demonstrate that there has been significant change occurring at Ku-ring-gai in the last three (3) years that could justify a potential transfer into the Metropolitan Centres category. This category is comprised of some very large regional Councils like Bankstown, Liverpool, Baulkham Hills, Randwick, Sutherland and Gosford. These Councils are typically large multi-purpose organisations which serve as regional centres for the interests of a wider number of residents. They are characterised by large populations and large revenues. Council business may include significant infrastructure and support for commercial and retail facilities. They also have high population growth and urban residential development or host significant sports / recreational / cultural facilities and major education / health facilities.
Therefore without any significant changes occurring within Ku-ring-gai, in regards to the categorisation criteria, and along with the results of the 2009 review where zero number of Councils from 25 submissions were transferred into another category this report recommends not to make a submission to the Tribunal at this time.
A. That Council receive and note the letter from the Tribunal.
B. That Councillors wishing to address the Tribunal regarding categorisation matters notify the General Manager by 10 February 2012.
|
Matt Ryan Manager Governance & Records |
Tino Caltabiano Acting Director Corporate |
A1View |
Local Government Remuneration Tribunal Review for 2012 determination |
|
2011/259860 |
|
|
A2View |
Local Government Remuneration Tribunal - Report and Determination - April 2009 |
|
2011/290438 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.6 / 312 |
|
|
Item GB.6 |
S05273 |
|
17 January 2012 |
Investment Report as at 31 December 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To present to Council investment allocations and returns on investments for December 2011. |
|
|
background: |
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy. |
|
|
comments: |
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) decreased the official cash rate by 25 bps to 4.25% in December 2011. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That the summary of investments and performance for December 2011 be received and noted. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted. |
Purpose of Report
To present to Council investment allocations and returns on investments for December 2011.
Background
Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.
Comments
During the month of December, Council had a net cash outflow of $3,356,625 and a net investment gain (interest and capital) of $506,951. The net cash outflow was mainly due to property acquisitions of 2-8 Gilroy Road Turramurra.
Council’s total investment portfolio at the end of December 2011 is $101,761,859. This compares to an opening balance of $107,291,329 as at 1 July 2011, a decrease of $5,529,470.
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Council’s investment portfolio is monitored and assessed based on the following criteria:
§ Management of General Fund Bank Balance
The aim is to keep the general fund bank balance as low as possible and hence maximise the amount invested on a daily basis.
§ Cash
11am Cash Rate is used and currently applies to the Westpac Business Cheque Plus Account and AMP Business Easy Saver Account.
§ Funds Performance against the UBS Bank Bill Index
This measures the annualised yield (net of fees and charges) for Council’s portfolio, except for cash and the New South Wales Treasury Corporation Long Term Growth Facility. The weighted average return for the remaining portfolio of funds is compared to the industry benchmark of the UBS Bank Bill Index.
§ Allocation of Surplus Funds
This represents the mix or allocation of surplus funds in appropriate investments that maximise returns and minimise risk.
Management of General Fund Bank Balance
During December, Council had a net outflow of funds of $3,356,625.
Investment Portfolio
Council’s investment portfolio consists of the following types of investments:
1. Floating Rate Notes (FRN)
FRNs are a contractual obligation whereby the issuer has an obligation to pay the investor an interest coupon payment which is based on a margin above bank bill. The risk to the investor is the ability of the issuer to meet the obligation.
The following investments are classified as FRNs
ANZ sub-debt A+ purchased 18/12/07 at discount
ANZ sub-debt A+ purchased 20/12/07 at discount
Bendigo Bank A- purchased 9/11/07 at par
ANZ sub-debt A+ purchased 17/1/08 at par
HSBC Bank AA- purchased 14/3/08 at par
Royal Bank of Scotland (Australia Branch) purchased 27/08/10 at par
senior-debt A+ (downgraded from AA- by S&P)
These FRNs are all sub-debt or senior debt which means that they are guaranteed by the bank that issues them with sub-debt notes rated a notch lower than the bank itself. The reason for this is that the hierarchy for payments of debt in event of default is:
1. Term Deposits
2. Senior Debt
3. Subordinated Debt
4. Hybrids
5. Preference shares
6. Equity holders
In the case of default, the purchaser of subordinated debt is not paid until the senior debt holders are paid in full. Subordinated debt is therefore more risky than senior debt.
These types of investment are classified as Held to Maturity assets and they are therefore measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method in accordance with AASB 139: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
In terms of reporting, these investments are shown at their purchase price which is then adjusted up or down each month in accordance with the amortisation of the discount or premium. The effect of this is to show the investment at face value at maturity.
2. Fixed Interest Notes, Term Deposits, Transferable Deposits and Bonds
Fixed interest notes and term deposits pay a fixed amount of interest on a regular basis until their maturity date. The following investments are held by Council:
Westpac Fixed sub-debt A+ purchased 25/02/08 at discount
Investec Bank Term Deposit BBB purchased 03/09/08 at par
Westpac Bank Term Deposit (5 Year) AA- purchased 12/01/10 at par
St George Bank Term Deposit (3 Year) AA- purchased 18/02/10 at par
Commonwealth Bank Term Deposit (3 Year) AA- purchased 05/03/10 at par
Bank of Queensland Term Deposit (3 Year) BBB+ purchased 31/05/10 at par
Suncorp Bank Term Deposit (3 Year) A+ purchased 04/06/10 at par
Rural Bank Term Deposit (2 Year) BBB purchased 16/06/10 at par
St George Bank Term Deposit (3 Year) AA- purchased 28/06/10 at par
Suncorp Bank Term Deposit (3 Year) A+ purchased 03/08/10 at par
Suncorp Bank Term Deposit (3 Year) A+ purchased 04/08/10 at par
St George Bank Term Deposit (1 Year) AA- purchased 30/12/10 at par
AMP Bank Business Easy Saver Account (at-call) A purchased 30/12/10 at par
Bendigo Bank (1 Year) A- purchased 01/03/11 at par
AMP Bank Term Deposit (5 Year) A purchased 01/03/11 at par
Bendigo Bank Lindfield Branch (1 Year) A- purchased 06/06/11 at par
Community First Credit Union Term Deposit (1 Year) purchased 17/07/11 at par
AAA
St George Bank Term Deposit (5 Month) AA- purchased 09/09/11 at par
RaboDirect Term Deposit (6Month) AAA purchased 13/09/11 at par
AMP Bank Term Deposit (1 Year) A purchased 14/09/11 at par
AMP Bank Term Deposit (1 Year) A purchased 14/09/11 at par
Rural Bank Term Deposit (1 Year) BBB purchased 30/09/11 at par
As with FRNs, these investments are shown at purchase price with the discount or premium amortised over the period to maturity.
A Transferable Certificate of Deposit is a bank deposit (ie fixed interest) that may be transferred from one party to another. Council has four transferable deposits.
ANZ Transferable Deposits AA- purchased 22/04/08 at par
Deutsche Bank Transferable Certificates of purchased 04/09/09 at discount
Deposit A+
Commonwealth Bank Transferable purchased 11/09/09 at premium
Certificates of Deposit AA-
Bank of Queensland Senior Transferable Deposits purchased 06/12/10 at par
BBB+
Commonwealth Bank Floating Rate Transferable purchased 02/08/11 at par
Certificates of Deposit AA-
A bank bond is a debt security, in which the authorised bank owes the holders a debt and is obliged to repay the principal and interest (the coupon) at a later date, termed maturity.
Council has two bank bonds with senior debt obligations:
Commonwealth Bank Retail Bond AA- purchased 24/12/10 at par
Bendigo Bank Retail Bond A- purchased 15/03/11 at par
3. Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDO)
The following investment is classified as a CDO:
Maple Hill 11 CCC- (downgraded from purchased at par
AA by S&P)
(Please refer to comments on Individual Investment Performance section for details.)
A CDO is a structured financial product whose returns are linked to the performance of a portfolio of debt obligations. It is split into tranches, whereby the riskiest or lowest tranche, the “equity tranche”, receives the highest returns. Higher rated tranches offer protection against the risk of capital loss, but at proportionately diminishing returns.
These investments are also classified as held to maturity assets and are therefore measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method in accordance with AASB 139: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The investment is reported in the same manner as FRNs.
4. Constant Proportion Debt Obligations (CPDO)
The following investment is classified as a CPDO:
Royal Bank of Scotland Principal Protected CPDO A+ purchased at par
(downgraded from AA- by S&P)
This is an investment whose returns are based on trading credit default swap (CDS) contracts. A CDS is a contract between two parties where one agrees to accept the risk that a company will default on its loan repayment obligations in return for payment of a fee. Only contracts on investment grade organisations in the CDX (US) and ITraxx (Europe) indices are permissible.
5. Growth Investments
Investments that have been purchased on the basis of an anticipated growth in asset value rather than returns being based on an interest coupon have been classified as Growth Investments. The following investments are included in this category:
Longreach STIRM A+ (downgraded from AA- by S&P)
KRGC TCorp LTGF unrated
These investments are valued at fair value where the capital gain is credited to the Income Statement and a capital loss is debited to the Income Statement. The Longreach STIRM investment is principal guaranteed and the KRGC TCorp LTGF is not. The value shown in the monthly investment report is based on the redeemable Net Asset Value (NAV). The NAV is the total current market value of all securities plus interest or dividends received to date. This is the price or value of the investment at the time of preparing the report. Although the Longreach STIRM investment is principal guaranteed, reports are based on the NAV even when it falls below the par value.
The principal is guaranteed by the investment issuer monitoring the net asset value and selling the investments if the NAV falls below the level where a risk free investment will return the principal at the maturity date. Thus the worst case scenario, provided that the issuer remains solvent, for this investment is that overall return will be returns received to date plus return of principal at maturity date and no further interest payments for the remaining period.
While accounting and reporting for these investments is in accordance with the above, the following information is provided for each:
Longreach STIRM: This investment pays a fixed coupon of 2.5% and a floating coupon of 125% of the quarterly performance. A cap is applied to the total coupon at BBSW+25bps with any additional income going into the NAV. The worst case performance scenario is no coupon is paid due to 100% of investors’ funds being redeemed from the STIRM strategy and invested in a discount security to guarantee principal is returned at maturity.
KRGC TCorp LTGF NSW Treasury Corporation: This is a fund managed by the NSW Treasury Corporation which invests in a range of Australian shares 31%, international shares 31%, bonds, listed property and cash 38%. The return is based on the fund’s unit price at month end supplied by the fund. There is no principal guarantee with this fund and it is unrated.
Cash Performance against the 11am Cash Rate
The weighted average return for Cash year to date was 5.38% compared to the benchmark 11am Cash Rate of 4.33%.
Funds Performance against the UBS Bank Bill Index
The weighted average return for the total portfolio (except Cash & TCorp) year to date was 6.33% compared to the benchmark of the UBS Bank Bill Index of 4.96%.
NSW Treasury Corp against the Long Term Growth Facility Trust
The return for TCorp year to date was -8.04% compared to the benchmark Long Term Growth Facility Trust of -11.01%.
Comments on Individual Investment Performance
Term Deposit:
In the month of December, the following term deposits have matured.
· National Australia Bank AA $5,000,000 at 6.39% pa for 1 year
· Australian Defence Credit Union AAA $2,000,000 at 6.66% pa for 1 year
· National Australia Bank AA $4,000,000 at 6.45% pa for 1 year
· Suncorp Bank A+ $3,000,000 at 6.55% pa for 1 year
Longreach Series 23 STIRM: This investment is a capital protected note with exposure to a short term interest rate yield enhancement strategy. The redeemable NAV of the notes is estimated at $126.37, whereas at the end of last month it was $126.34. An annualised year to date return on the investment is 3.56% and 5.44% since inception.
NSW Treasury Corporation: The investment in the NSW TCorp Long Term Growth Facility is an approved investment under the updated Minister's Orders. The Facility is designed to give investors exposure to, and the returns from, a diversified pool of growth assets i.e. shares and listed property along with a cash component.
The investment was made in October 2006. This is a fund managed by the NSW Treasury Corporation which invests in a range of Australian shares 31%, international shares 31%, bonds, listed property and cash 38%. The fund’s annualised return is -8.04% and -0.74% since purchase.
Returns from the Facility in recent times have been hard hit by volatile global markets, returns across short time frames have been poor but over the longer term they have generally outperformed capital secure products.
The investment in the Facility does provide some useful diversification to Council's portfolio and has excellent liquidity should the funds be needed quickly.
Royal Bank of Scotland Principal Protected CPDO: This is an investment whose returns are based on trading credit default swap (CDS) contracts. Only contracts on investment grade organisations in the CDX (US) and ITraxx (Europe) indices are permissible. The risk to Council is that if enough of the companies default on their loan payment obligations, Council’s regular payments of interest would be reduced or cease. In the event of this occurring (cash-out event), the note reverts to a risk free bond investment to guarantee principal on maturity.
On 20 December 2011, Council received a notice of “Strategy Unwind Event” from RBS Morgans Ltd for Council’s Principal Protected CPDO ($6,000,000) issued by the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).
Under the terms of the unwind event the bank has advised that the security has ceased to pay interest effective immediately, this includes the coupon otherwise scheduled to be paid on 20 December 2011. The Security remains capital guaranteed with the principal amount of $6,000,000 being repaid at the maturity date on 5 September 2016 by RBS, which is rated A- by S&P.
If Council holds the investment till maturity, Council would achieve a 2.9% return, compared to an average benchmark of 5.74% since 2006.
As there is no active broad based market for trading this type of security, its value is mathematically determined as the present value of the future cash flow ($6M in September 2016), discounted at a rate the particular buyer believes will compensate for risk.
Council would only sell the investment if it was thought that we could achieve better returns than a potential buyer or if there was a belief that the Royal Bank of Scotland is likely to default before maturity in 2016. On that basis the recommendation of staff is, at this stage, to hold the investment to maturity (at 2.9%).
CDOs: The risk of losing principal in a CDO is based on the number of defaults in the portfolio of debt obligations combined with weighting of the entity in the portfolio and the recovery rate of the entities that default. The following information is provided for Council’s remaining CDO:
Maple Hill II
As a result of the global financial market crisis, in particular the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and the release of S&P CDO Evaluator 5.0 (a set of analytical tools that evaluates an entire CDO transaction), Maple Hill II was downgraded to CCC - from AA by S&P.
· Losses absorbed: 2.77%
· Losses remaining: 2.77%
· Recovery: Floating
· Portfolio: 139 (unequal weight)
· Credit events to date: 6 (Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Idearc, CIT Group & PMI)
· Credit events supported: 11.5 average sized, assuming average 33% recovery
· Credit events remaining: 6 average sized, assuming average 33% recovery. The note can withstand 5% of the portfolio defaulting, after allowing for recoveries.
· Maturity: 20 December 2014
There was no credit event in Council’s CDO during the month.
Allocation of funds
The following charts show the allocations of Council’s investment funds by various categories:
1) Credit Rating: Actual level of investment compared to proportion permitted by policy.
Investment Rating - Proportion
AAA to AA- |
36.85% |
A+ to A |
38.17% |
A- to BBB |
20.14% |
Less than BBB |
4.84% |
2) Proportional Split of Investments by Investment Institution: Actual portion of investments by investment institutions.
Council’s Investment Policy requires that the maximum proportion of its portfolio invested with any individual financial institution is 25%.
3) Investment type and YTD return: Actual proportion of investments by type and year to date return.
4) Duration: Strategic allocation of investments by duration.
Cumulative Investment Return
The following table shows Council’s total return on investments for December and financial year to date, split into capital and interest components and compared to budget:
At the end of December 2011, the net return on investment totalled $3,184,000 against a budget of $2,198,000 giving a positive variance for the year of $986,000.
An adjustment to budget will be considered at the December Quarterly Budget Review, taking into account the interest returns to date and future interest rate yield curve.
Total Investment Portfolio
The following chart compares the year to date investment portfolio balances for 2011/2012.
During December 2011 Council’s investment portfolio decreased by $3,356,625.
Some key points in relation to investments and associated markets during December are:
International Market
· The European Union leaders’ “fiscal compact” was put in place during the month, whereby financial sanctions are placed upon European countries that exceed agreed levels for the ratio of Debt to GDP. A key part of the plan was to establish a financial transaction tax which effectively amounted to a tax on the UK banking system. This has caused concern within the UK, as a result, there are some serious doubts on the overall likelihood of meaningful success.
· US economic data had an upbeat tone, this was a continuation of the experience of the last few months and is giving the market some heart with some possible sustainable signs of a stable economic recovery.
· In the US Purchasing Managers Index data was up as were October pending home sales. The data released from the labour market showed a drop in the Unemployment rate to 8.6% with a large rise of 120,000 jobs. This performance was repeated in December although seasonal impacts may be reversed in early 2012. On the other side of the coin Quarter 3 GDP growth levels were revised down to 1.8% from the reported 2%.
Domestic Market
· The RBA again lowered the cash rate during the month to 4.25%, the second such move in consecutive months indicating their level of concern regarding the outlook for global economic growth. Physical bank bills dropped in yield with 90 day rates falling below 4.50% as the market continues to expect further RBA cuts on the cash rate.
· December was another light month for Australian economic data with the numbers released being quite poor. October building approvals dropped by 10.7% whilst Quarter 3 GDP rose by a modest 1% which was marginally above market expectations. The year-on-year GDP growth rate was revised up to 2.5%.
· The Unemployment data was quite weak with a drop in jobs of 6,300 with a resultant small uptick in the Unemployment rate to 5.3%. Consumer confidence remains poor dropping again by 8.3%.
· The Australian dollar was mixed overall but was up against the USD and marginally up on a Trade Weighted Index basis particularly in the second half of the month. The late rally was reported to be on the back of improved investor sentiment with the results of passable bond auctions in Spain and Italy going through. In addition there was a slight reduction in market expectations for subsequent RBA rate cuts combined with end of month/quarter/year reporting adjustments adding a bullish tone.
Governance Matters
Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy which was adopted by Council on 20 April 2010.
Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:
(1) The responsible accounting officer of a council:
(a) must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:
(i) if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or
(ii) if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and
(b) must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.
(2) The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.
Risk Management
The risk associated with investing Council funds is the loss of income and/or assets from investment failure and/or poor investment performance. The level of risk with Council’s new investments is considered low, as investments are made only in a form of investment notified by order of the Minister for Local Government and Council’s adopted Investment Policy, which as a consequence of the Minister’s Order, is considered conservative. Also, all investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, Denison Financial Advisory.
Financial Considerations
The budget for interest on investments for 2011/2012 is $4,396,000. Of this amount approximately $2,912,800 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to developers’ contributions, $742,400 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $740,800 is available for operations.
At the end of December 2011, the net return on investment totalled $3,184,000 against a budget of $2,198,000 giving a positive variance for the year of $986,000.
An adjustment to budget will be considered at the December Quarterly Budget Review, taking into account the interest returns to date and future interest rate yield curve.
Social Considerations
Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations
Not applicable.
Community Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Internal Consultation
None undertaken or required.
Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy which was adopted by Council on 20 April 2010.
Summary
As at 31 December 2011:
Ø Council’s total investment portfolio is $101,761,859. This compares to an opening balance of $107,291,329 as at 1 July 2011, a decrease of $ 5,529,470.
Ø Council’s year to date net return on investments (interest and capital) totals $3,184,000. This compares to the year to date revised budget of $2,198,000, giving a positive variance of $986,000.
Ø The weighted average return for Cash year to date was 5.38% compared to the benchmark 11am Cash Rate of 4.33%.
Ø The weighted average return for the total portfolio (except Cash & TCorp) year to date was 6.33% compared to the benchmark of the UBSWA Bank Bill Index of 4.96%.
Ø The weighted average return for TCorp year to date was -8.04% compared to the benchmark Long Term Growth Facility Trust of -11.01%.
A. That the summary of investments and performance for December 2011 be received and noted.
B. That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.
|
Tony Ly Financial Accounting Officer |
Tino Caltabiano Acting Director Corporate |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.7 / 343 |
|
|
Item GB.7 |
DA0557/11 |
|
16 January 2012 |
development application
Summary Sheet
Report title: |
208 The Comenarra Parkway, Wahroonga - Construction of a swimming pool |
ITEM/AGENDA NO: |
GB.7 |
Application No: |
DA0557/11 |
Property Details: |
208 The Comenarra Parkway, Wahroonga Lot & DP No: Lot 2 & DP 1155858 Site area (m2): 513m² Zoning: Residential 2(c) |
Ward: |
|
Proposal/Purpose: |
To determine Development Application DA0557/11 which is for the construction of a swimming pool and associated works
|
Type of Consent: |
Local |
Applicant: |
Outside Living Pty Ltd |
Owner: |
Mr Stuart Quirk & Mrs Simone Quirk |
Date Lodged: |
19 October 2011 |
Recommendation: |
Approval |
Purpose of Report
To determine Development Application 0557/11, which is for the construction of a swimming pool and associated works at 208 The Comenarra Parkway, Wahroonga.
This application is required to be determined by full Council in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Planning Circular PS08-14 (attached) which does not permit Development Applications that propose variations to development standards in excess of 10% to be determined under delegated authority.
Executive Summary
Issues: SEPP 1 Objections – Minimum lot size and built upon area
Submissions: No submissions
Land & Environment Court Appeal: No
Recommendation: Approval
History
DA History
DA1167/03 - DA1169/03
On 12 April 2004, The NSW Land and Environment Court granted development consent for (3) houses and subdivision into (2) allotments at No.208 Comenarra Parkway, Wahroonga. The consent was granted in (3) stages.
The first stage involved the erection of a house at the street end of the existing allotment and another at the rear end of the lot. The second stage created two Torrens title lots, one for each house. The third stage involved the erection of a second house on the rear allotment.
DA0040/05
On 8 June 2005, Council granted development consent to Torrens title subdivide the rear allotment into two lots, with one approved house on each lot.
MOD0280/10
On 17 December 2010, Council granted development consent to modify Condition 48 of DA1169/03. Condition 48 was modified to allow for the removal of the existing tree and shrub planting located between the driveway and eastern site boundary for the area adjacent to the three dwellings, and replaced with a native ornamental grass species that grows to a maximum height of 0.5metres to allow fire fighting vehicles to pass over without impediment.
Current DA History
19 October 2011 The application was lodged.
26 October 2011 The application was notified.
22 November 2011 Council requests SEPP 1 objections for built upon area and minimum lot area.
28 December 2011 The applicant submits SEPP 1 objections.
The Site
THE SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA
Visual character study category: |
1945-1968 |
Easements/rights of way: |
Right of access Easement for drainage Right of carriageway for fire fighting purposes Easement for services Private re-use and retention facility |
Heritage Item: |
No |
Heritage conservation area: |
No |
In the vicinity of a heritage item: |
No |
Bush fire prone land: |
Yes (Buffer zone) |
Endangered species: |
No |
Urban bushland: |
No |
Contaminated land: |
No |
Site Description
The site is legally described as Lot 2 in DP 1155858 and is known as 208 The Comenarra Parkway, Wahroonga. The site is rectangular in shape, with a frontage to The Comenarra Parkway of 13.24 metres, and a site depth of 38.75 metres. The site has a total area of 513m². The site falls gently towards The Comenarra Parkway. The level change between the front and rear boundary is 1m. The site contains a two storey brick dwelling within an established garden setting.
Surrounding Development
The site is located within the 1945-1968 visual character study area. The subject site is adjoined to the south by two storey dwelling houses on steeper allotments. To the east and west of the site are dwelling houses on larger allotments with deeper rear setback areas.
The Proposal
The proposal is for the construction of a swimming pool and associated works.
· the swimming pool has a length of 5.0 metres and a width of 2.7 metres
· the coping level for the swimming pool is RL157.72
· 11.4m² of paving is proposed around the perimeter of the swimming pool
· fencing around the perimeter of the pool to be upgraded to comply with AS1926
· pool filter enclosure to be located adjacent to western boundary
CONSULTATION - COMMUNITY
In accordance with Council's Development Control Plan No. 56 - Notification, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. No submissions were received.
CONSULTATION - WITHIN COUNCIL
Engineering
Council’s Development Engineer raised no objection to the proposal, subject to standard conditions.
Landscaping
Council’s Landscape Development Officer raised no objection to the proposal, subject to conditions.
CONSULTATION – OUTSIDE COUNCIL
Rural Fire Service
In accordance with the provisions of section Part 1(b) of Section 79BA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Council has been provided with a certificate by a person who is recognised by the NSW Rural Fire Service as a qualified consultant in bush fire risk assessment stating that the development conforms to the relevant specifications and requirements. As such, the application does not require a referral to Rural Fire Services.
Council has considered the measures to be taken with respect to the protection of persons, property and the environment from danger that may arise from a bush fire. Appropriate conditions that adopt the recommendations of the bush fire risk assessment report and certificate are recommended.
Statutory Provisions
This application is deemed to be ‘local development’ under Part 4 of the EP and A Act 1979, and requires development consent pursuant to the KPSO.
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards (SEPP1)
Clause 60C of the KPSO states that the maximum built-upon area of land on which a dwelling house is proposed to be erected or extended is 60%.
The existing built-upon area of the site is 305.5m2 or 59.5% of the total site area. The applicant seeks to increase the built-upon area by 24.9m2 to 330.4.8m2 or 64.4% of the total site area. A SEPP No. 1 objection has been lodged as the built upon area is non-compliant with the development standard. The merits of this objection are considered under KPSO “Part A: Development Standards” below.
Clause 43(3) of the KPSO states that a dwelling house shall not be erected in Zone No 2(c) –
(a) on any allotment which has an area of less than 929m²;
(b) on any rectangularly shaped allotment which has a width of less than 18 metres;
The subject site has an area of 513m² and a width of 13.24metres. A SEPP No. 1 objection has been lodged as the allotment size is non-compliant with the development standard. The merits of this objection are considered under KPSO “Part A: Development Standards” below.
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land
The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.
State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005
Matters for consideration include biodiversity, ecology and environmental protection, public access to and scenic qualities of foreshores and waterways, maintenance of views, control of boat facilities and maintenance of a working harbour. The proposal is not in close proximity to or within views of the waterway or wetland.
Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance
Part A: Development standards
Development standard |
Proposed |
Complies |
Site area: 513m2 |
||
Minimum size allotments |
|
|
Site area: 929m2 (min) |
513m2 |
NO* |
Site width: 18m (min) |
13.2m |
NO* |
Height: 8m or 2 storey (max) |
No change to building height |
N/A |
Building height 8m (max) |
No change to building height |
N/A |
Built upon area 60%(307.8m2)(max) |
64.4% (330.4m2) |
NO* |
* SEPP 1 Objection
Minimum size allotments (Clause 43(3):
The subject site has a site area of 513m² and a site width of 13.24 metres and does not comply with Council’s minimum allotment size development standard under clause 43(3) of the KPSO. A review of the Deposited Plan for the site has indicated that the plan was registered on 7 March 2011 (after the appointed day of the KPSO). The applicant’s SEPP No. 1 objection is assessed against the following considerations:
whether the planning control to be varied is a development standard
Clause 43 (3) of the Ku-ring gai planning scheme ordinance states:
A dwelling house shall not be erected in Zone 2(c) -
(a) on any allotment which has an area of less that 929 square metres;
(b) on any rectangular shaped allotment which has a width if less than 18m;
(c) on any irregular shaped allotment, other than a hatched shaped allotment, which has a width of less than 18m at a distance of 12.2 metres from the street alignment;
(d) on any hatched shaped allotment which has an area of less than 1300 square metres exclusive of the area of the access corridor which will have a width of not less than 4.6 metres;
(e) on any allotment, other than a hatched shaped allotment, having a frontage to a main road or county road which allotment has a width of less than 27.4 metres at a distance of 12.2 metres from the street alignment.
Clause 43 (3) of the KPSO prescribes a minimum allotment size of 929m² and minimum site width of 18metres for rectangularly shaped allotments. As the KPSO is a statutory planning instrument, this control is a development standard as defined under Section 4 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
the underlying objective or purpose behind the standard
There are no specifically stated purposes or objectives expressed in clause 43 (3) of the KPSO. Scheduled 9 of the KPSO does however provide general aims and objectives for residential zones as follows:
1. The general aims of this Ordinance in relation to land within Zones Nos 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), 2(e), 2(f), 2(g) and 2(h) are -
(a) to maintain and, where appropriate, improve the existing amenity and environmental character of residential zones; and
(b) to permit new residential development only where it is compatible with the existing environmental character of the locality and has a sympathetic and harmonious with adjoining development.
2. The specific objectives of this Ordinance in relation to land within Zones Nos 2 (a), 2(b), 2(c), 2(d), 2(e), 2(f), 2(g) and 2(h) are to ensure that –
(a) all new dwelling-houses and additions to dwelling-houses maintain a reasonable
level of sunlight to neighbours' living areas and recreation space between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. during the winter solstice on 22 June; and
(b) all new dwelling-houses and additions to dwelling-houses are sited and designed so as to minimise overlooking of neighbours' living areas and recreation space; and
(c) any building or development work shall maintain or encourage replacement of treecover whenever possible to ensure the predominant landscape quality of the Municipality is maintained and enhanced; and
(d) any building or development work on a site avoids total or near total site utilisation by maintaining a reasonable proportion of the site as a soft landscaping area; and
(e) all new dwelling-houses and additions to existing dwelling-houses are of a height,
size and bulk generally in keeping with that of neighbouring properties and, where larger buildings are proposed, they are designed so as not to dominate and so far as possible to harmonise with neighbouring development; and
(f) in areas where one period, style or genre of architecture predominates, the new
dwelling-house reflects either that style or the main stylistic features such as roof pitch, materials, proportions, setbacks, etc. and additions to existing dwelling-houses reflect the style of and continue the main stylistic features of the existing structure; and
(g) all new dwelling-houses and additions provide reasonable space on the site for the forward entrance and exit of vehicles; and
(h) all applications will be assessed against the considerations of section 90 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and section 313 of the Local Government Act 1919.
whether compliance with the development standard is consistent with the aims of the policy and in particular, whether compliance with the development standard hinders the attainment of the objectives specified under section 5(A)(i), (ii), and (iv) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
The aim of SEPP 1 is to:
Provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating by virtue of development standards in circumstances where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in Section 5(a) (i) and (ii) of the Act.
In this regard, the objects of Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act are:
(a) To encourage:
(i) the proper management, development and conservation of natural and artificial resources, including agricultural land, natural areas, forests, minerals, water, cities, towns and villages for the purpose of promoting the social and economic welfare of the community and a better environment;
(ii) the promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land.
Compliance with the development standard is considered to be consistent with SEPP 1 and compliance will not hinder attainment of the objectives in Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) for the reasons advanced below.
whether compliance with the development standards is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstance of the case
The applicant has put forward the following arguments in their SEPP No. 1 objection in support of the variation to the development standard:
· The proposed development does not pertain to the establishment of a lot or the construction of a dwelling house on the allotment but rather the carrying out of physical works for the use of the land, specifically the installation of ancillary development (swimming pool) within the front yard of the site.
· The proposed development will be compatible with the existing character of the locality in that it will be consistent with the use of the site as a residential lot, and will maintain a sympathetic and harmonious relationship with adjoining sites.
It is noted that the proposal would result in a variation to the standard of 44.78%. In order to meet the development standard, the applicant would be required to either increase the lot area and width, effectively sterilising the site for any future development. This is considered to be unreasonable, noting there is an existing approved dwelling located on a Court approved subdivided lot. The extent of works proposed are not considered to result in a development which is too large for the site and results in acceptable impacts on adjoining properties including the public domain.
whether the objection is well founded
For the reasons advanced above, the SEPP 1 objection is considered to be well founded.
Built-upon area (Clause 60C):
The proposed development has a built-upon area of 64.4% and does not comply with Council’s maximum built-upon area development standard under clause 60C of the KPSO. The applicant’s SEPP No. 1 objection is assessed against the following considerations:
whether the planning control to be varied is a development standard
Clause 60C of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance (KPSO) states:
(2) The maximum built-upon area of the land to which this clause applies is 60%; and
(3) In this clause;
Built-upon area means the area of a site containing any built structure (whether covered or uncovered), any building, carport, terrace, pergola, hard-surface recreation area, swimming pool, tennis court, driveway, parking area of any like structure, but excluding minor landscape features
Clause 60C of the KPSO prescribes a maximum built-upon area of 60%. As the KPSO is a statutory planning instrument, this control is a development standard as defined under Section 4 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
the underlying objective or purpose of the standard
There are no specifically stated purposes or objectives expressed in clause 60C of the KPSO.
Objectives of part 4.2 (Building Form) of Development Control Plan No. 38 serve as a guide and include the following:
(b) To ensure that building bulk, height, location and footprint provide for sufficient soft landscape area for planting and retention of large canopy trees
(c) To allow for adequate daylight, sunlight and ventilation to living areas and private open spaces of new and neighbouring dwellings
(d) To protect reasonable neighbour amenity including visual and acoustic privacy particularly in regard to living areas and private open space
(g) To achieve consistency with the principles of ecologically sustainable development
The objectives of section 4.2.7 (Built-upon Area) of Development Control Plan No. 38 are also instructive. The intention of the control specified by this section of the DCP is specifically outlined by the following objective:
Maintain a reasonable proportion of the site as soft landscaping to ensure the predominant landscape character of the locality is maintained or enhanced.
whether compliance with the development standard is consistent with the aims of the policy and whether compliance hinders the attainment of the objectives specified in section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act
The aim of SEPP 1 is to:
Provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating by virtue of development standards in circumstances where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in Section 5(a) (i) and (ii) of the Act.
In this regard, the objects of Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act are:
(a) To encourage:
(i) the proper management, development and conservation of natural and artificial resources, including agricultural land, natural areas, forests, minerals, water, cities, towns and villages for the purpose of promoting the social and economic welfare of the community and a better environment;
(ii) the promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land.
Compliance with the development standard is considered to be consistent with SEPP 1 and compliance will not hinder attainment of the objectives in Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) for the reasons advanced below.
whether compliance with the standard unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case
The applicant has put forward the following arguments in their SEPP No. 1 objection in support of the variation to the development standard:
(i) The site will continue to support a generous garden area, including effective screen planting as well as a number of suitable trees.
(ii) No screen or shrub vegetation is proposed to be removed to accommodate the swimming pool.
(iii) The swimming pool will improve the general amenity of the site for the owners and residents, without having any adverse impacts on the adjoining properties or locality.
(iv) There is a large proportion of the site (20.41%) that is set aside for the provision of right of access for Lot 3 and Lot 4, an easement for drainage of water, a right of carriageway for fire fighting purposes and an easement for services. Remainder of the property has been modestly developed and the proposed development is for a small swimming pool with an adjoining functional paved area.
(v) The proposed development is considered appropriate to the existing and desired future use of the site.
The maximum permissible built upon area for this site is 307.8m² or 60% of the site area. The approved built upon area for this site was 305.5m² (59.55%). The applicant proposes to increase the built upon area on the site by a maximum of 24.9m² to 330.4m² (64.4%). Achieving strict compliance with the development standard is considered to be unreasonable, noting the existing restrictions on-site (easements, right of carriageways, re-use & retention facilities). The extent of works proposed are not considered to result in a development which is too large for the site and results in acceptable impacts on adjoining properties including the public domain.
whether the objection is well founded
For the reasons advanced above, the SEPP 1 objection is considered to be well founded.
Part B: Aims and objectives for residential zones:
The development: (i) provides satisfactory levels of solar access & privacy to surrounding properties; (ii) is of a bulk, scale and design, characteristic of the area; (iii) maintains adequate levels of soft landscaping; (iv) provides suitable egress/ingress for vehicles; and (v) maintains the landscape quality of the municipality. Consequently, the aims and objectives for residential development as outlined by Schedule 9 would be satisfied.
POLICY PROVISIONS
Development Control Plan No. 38 - Ku-ring-gai Residential Design Manual
Development Control |
Proposed |
Complies |
4.6 Ancillary facilities: |
||
Swimming pools (s.4.6.1) |
|
|
Setback from boundary: 2m |
1.6m (western boundary) 3.04m (northern boundary) |
NO
YES |
Pool coping <500mm above ground level |
700mm |
NO |
Pool excavation not below the canopy of trees
|
|
YES |
Swimming pools (s.4.6.1)
The assessment criteria of section 4.6.1 of the DCP states that ‘swimming pool/spa and/or enclosure must be well design and located so that there is sufficient area adjacent to the property boundary for substantial landscape planting to minimise potentially adverse impacts such as noise, glare, and visual intrusion.’
The design requirements of section 4.6.1 of the DCP states that ‘this must be achieved by ensuring that the swimming pool/spa coping is sited a minimum of 2 metres from the property boundary.’ The swimming pool coping is proposed to be setback a minimum of 1.6metres from the western boundary. This non compliance is considered acceptable for the following reasons:
(i) The existing landscaping along the western boundary will effectively screen the swimming pool from the adjoining property (No.210 The Comenarra Parkway).
(ii) The existing, 1800mm high, colorbond fence along the western boundary will further screen the swimming pool.
(ii) The adjoining property to the west of the subject site has a driveway adjacent to the common boundary, with the garage set back 29 metres from the front boundary and the dwelling located further back in the site. No adverse impacts to this property are envisaged as the principal private open space is to the rear of this dwelling.
The design requirements of section 4.6.1 of the DCP also state ‘the pool coping level must not be more than 500mm above existing ground level at any point.’ The pool coping is proposed to be a maximum of 700mm above existing ground level. The non compliance is acceptable for the following reason:
(i) The swimming pool is set back 3.04 metres from the northern boundary. The existing landscaping (maintained at a height of approximately 2.5metres) between the proposed pool and northern boundary will effectively screen the development from the public domain.
The pool filter is proposed adjacent to the western boundary. The filter enclosure will be soundproofed to ensure there is no noise reading exceeding 5dba above background noise level when measures at the western boundary (Conditions 31 & 32).
Part 4.4 – Privacy
Visual and acoustic privacy will be maintained with the adjoining properties and the public domain with the retention of the boundary fencing and the 2.5 metre high landscaping along the northern, eastern and western boundaries of the site.
Development Control Plan 40 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management
The key objectives of DCP 40 is to encourage building design and construction techniques which will minimise waste generation, implement the principles of the waste hierarchy of avoiding, re-using and recycling building and construction materials, household-generated waste and industrial/commercial waste. Minimise the environmental impacts of waste and promote the principles of ecologically sustainable development.
The proposed works comply with the objectives of DCP 40.
Likely Impacts
The proposal will not have any adverse impacts.
Suitability of The Site
The site is zoned for residential purposes and is suitable for the proposed development, being construction of a swimming pool and associated works.
Any Submissions
There were no submissions.
Public Interest
Approval of the application would not contravene the public interest.
any other relevant considerations
There are no other matters for consideration.
CONCLUSION
Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) of the EnVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979
THAT the Council, as the consent authority, is of the
opinion that the objections under State Environmental Planning Policy No.
1 – Development Standards to clauses 43(3) and 60C of the
AND
THAT the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objections under SEPP No. 1 are well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0557/11 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grants development consent to DA0557/11 for construction of a swimming pool on land at No. 208 The Comenarra Parkway, Wahroonga for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation
The development must be carried out in accordance with work shown in colour on the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
3. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
4. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
5. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
7. Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
8. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
9. Construction waste management plan
Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s DCP 40 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management.
The plan shall address all issues identified in DCP 40, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.
Note: The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
10. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
11. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $12,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $12,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
12. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
13. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
14. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
15. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
16. Statement of compliance with Australian Standards
The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.
17. Construction noise
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with Australian Standards.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.
18. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
19. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
20. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
21. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
22. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
23. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
24. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
25. Erosion control
Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.
Reason: To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.
26. Drainage to existing system
Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.
Reason: To protect the environment.
27. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
28. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
29. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
30. Infrastructure repair
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
31. Swimming pool (part 1)
Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:
C1 1. Access to the pool/spa shall be restricted by a child resistant barrier in accordance with the regulations prescribed in the Swimming Pools Act, 1992:
(a) The pool shall not be filled with water or be allowed to collect stormwater until the child resistant barrier is installed; and (b) The barrier is to conform to the requirements of AS 1926-1 2007 Fences and Gates for Private Swimming Pools.
Reason: To ensure the safety of children.
2. Any mechanical equipment associated with the swimming pool and/or spa pool shall be located in a sound-attenuating enclosure. The Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the sound levels associated with the swimming pool/spa filtration system and associated mechanical equipment do not exceed 5dB(A) above the background noise level at the boundaries of the site.
Reason: To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
32. Swimming pool (part 2)
At all times:
1. Access to the swimming pool must be restricted by fencing or other measures as required by the Swimming Pools Act 1992.
2. Noise levels associated with spa/pool pumping units shall not exceed 5dB(A) at the boundaries of the site.
3. Devices or structures used for heating swimming pool water must not be placed where they are visible from a public place.
4. For the purpose of health and amenity, the disposal of backwash and/or the emptying of a swimming pool into a reserve, watercourse, easement or storm water drainage system is prohibited. These waters are to discharge via a permanent drainage line into Sydney Water's sewer in accordance with Australian Standard AS3500.2 section 10.9. Permission is to be obtained from Sydney Water prior to the emptying of any pool to the sewer.
5. Lighting from the swimming pool and other communal facilities shall not detrimentally impact the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings.
Reason: Health and amenity.
|
Luke Donovan Development Assessment Officer |
Selwyn Segall Team Leader - Development Assessment North |
Corrie Swanepoel Manager Development Assessment Services |
Michael Miocic Director Development & Regulation |
A1View |
Locality Map |
|
2012/020297 |
|
|
A2View |
Zoning Extract |
|
2012/020298 |
|
A3View |
SEPP 1 Objections |
|
2011/291812 |
|
A4View |
Statement of Environmental Effects |
|
2011/232531 |
|
A5View |
Plans |
|
2012/021522 |
|
A6View |
Bushfire Certificate |
|
2011/232549 |
|
A7View |
DOP Circular PS08-014 |
|
2010/010577 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.8 / 392 |
|
|
Item GB.8 |
DA0274/11 |
|
15 November 2011 |
development application
Summary Sheet
Report title: |
24 Tryon Road Lindfield - Demolition of existing dwelling & erection of 5 townhouses, basement carparking, landscaping and strata subdivision |
ITEM/AGENDA NO: |
GB.8 |
Application No: |
DA0274/11 |
Property Details: |
24 Tryon Road Lindfield Lot & DP No: Lot 4 DP 927380 Site area (m2): 1300.6m2 Zoning: Residential 2d(3) |
Ward: |
Roseville
|
Proposal/Purpose: |
Demolition of existing dwelling, granny flat and erection of 5 townhouses, parking, landscaping and strata subdivision
|
Type of Consent: |
Local |
Applicant: |
Glendinning Minto & Associates |
Owner: |
PTL Pty Ltd |
Date Lodged: |
1 June 2011 |
Recommendation: |
Approval |
Purpose of Report
To determine Development Application No. 274/11 for the demolition of an existing dwelling and granny flat and erection of five townhouses, basement car parking, landscaping and strata subdivision.
Executive Summary
Issues: Number of storeys (SEPP No. 1 objection), site frontage (SEPP No. 1 objection) and building setbacks
Submissions: Two submissions received
Land and Environment Court: N/A
Recommendation: Approval
History
Site
The site has historically been used for residential purposes. Development currently on the site comprises a single storey dwelling with a detached garage/granny flat fronting Kochia Lane.
Rezoning
Ku-ring-gai LEP (Town Centres) 2010 was gazetted on 25 May 2010. The subject site was zoned R4 – High Density Residential pursuant to the LEP. The Land and Environment Court declared that the LEP is of “no legal force or effect” meaning that it no longer applies to any land at all, effective 28 July 2011. The site has therefore reverted to its zoning of 2d(3) under the KPSO (LEP 194).
Pre-DA
A pre-lodgement consultation (PRE0071/10) took place on 26 July 2010. Concerns were raised at the pre-lodgement meeting relating to a number of issues including building setbacks, number of storeys, solar access, private courtyards, basement design and construction management. It is noted that the proposal was considered pursuant to Ku-ring-gai LEP (Town Centres) 2010 during the pre-lodgement process.
Current development application history
2 June 2011 The application was lodged with Council.
7 June – 18 July 2011 The application was notified to the owners of surrounding properties. Two (2) submissions were received.
18 August 2011 The applicant was advised of the Land and Environment Court decision regarding Ku-ring-gai LEP (Town Centres) 2010. The applicant was also advised of Council officers’ concerns regarding deep soil landscaping, building setbacks, setback of courtyards, common space, communal living space, building height, urban design, solar access, landscaping, environmental site management, BASIX, basement design, and drawing inaccuracies.
2 September 2011 The applicant advised of their intention to amend the proposal to comply with the KPSO (LEP 194) and DCP 55.
22 September 2011 Conceptual plans to address urban design concerns were received by Council and were referred to Council’s urban design consultant for comment.
29 September 2011 Urban design comments regarding the draft amended plans were received.
27 October 2011 Revised plans and supporting documentation were formally
submitted.
15 November 2011 The applicant was advised that concerns regarding number of storeys, site frontage, deep soil area, front setback and courtyard setbacks still remained.
21 November 2011 Revised plans and supporting information were received by Council.
28 November 2011 Revised architectural and landscaping plans and BASIX certificate were received by Council.
14 December 2011 The applicant was advised that Council’s previous landscaping concerns had not been satisfactorily addressed.
20 December 2011 An amended SEPP No. 1 objection concerning street frontage was requested.
21 December 2011 The amended SEPP No. 1 objection was received.
6 January 2012 Amended architectural plans, landscape plans and BASIX certificate were received.
The Site
Site Description
Visual character study category: |
1920-1945 |
Easements/rights of way: |
No |
Heritage Item: |
No |
Heritage conservation area: |
No |
In the vicinity of a heritage item: |
Yes – No. 33 Tryon Road (no significant impacts) |
Bush fire prone land: |
No |
Endangered species: |
None identified |
Urban bushland: |
No |
Contaminated land: |
No |
The site is known as No. 24 Tryon Road, Lindfield. The site has a primary frontage to Tryon Road and a secondary frontage to Kochia Lane. The site is located on the north-western side of Tryon Road and the south-western side of Kochia Lane. The site is a rectangular shaped allotment with a width of 21.335 metres, depth of 60.96 metres and area of 1300.6m2.
Development on the site comprises a single storey dwelling fronting Tryon Road. There is a circular driveway providing vehicular access to Tryon Road, as well as a driveway providing rear access from Kochia Lane. A garage with granny flat over is located adjacent to the Kochia Lane driveway.
Fencing on the site comprises a vegetation covered brick wall along the Tryon Road frontage and wire mesh fencing along the side boundaries. There is a brick retaining wall along the Kochia Lane frontage.
Surrounding Development
The surrounding locality comprises a mixture of development types, including commercial development, residential flat buildings, a place of public worship, an educational establishment and dwelling houses.
The property immediately to the north-east of the site is known as No. 26-28 Tryon Road and is an educational establishment (Cromehurst School.) The school comprises numerous one and two storey buildings. The site is zoned Residential 2d(3).
The adjoining property to the south-west is known as No. 20-22 Tryon Road and contains a five storey residential flat building which is currently under construction.
Located to the north-west of the site is Kochia Lane. Development fronting Kochia Lane comprises residential dwelling houses.
The Proposal
The application proposes demolition of existing structures on site and construction of multi-dwelling housing comprising four x two storey townhouses and one mainly three storey townhouse with basement car parking for 12 vehicles.
The basement contains two car parking spaces for each dwelling, as well two visitor spaces, one of which is accessible. The basement contains storage areas for each dwelling, a common storage area and a common waste/recycling area. It is proposed to locate the air conditioning units within the basement.
The proposed dwellings are as follows:
Dwelling 1: Proposed Dwelling 1 is located in the south-eastern corner of the site, with pedestrian access from Tryon Road. The dwelling comprises a living/dining room, kitchen, sitting room, laundry and powder room at ground floor level and two bedrooms with ensuites, as well as a media nook, linen closet and balcony at first floor level.
Dwelling 2: Proposed Dwelling 2 is located in the south-western corner of the site, with pedestrian access from Tryon Road. The dwelling comprises a living/dining room, kitchen, sitting room, laundry, powder room and bedroom at ground floor level and two bedrooms with ensuites, as well as a media nook, linen closet and balcony at first floor level.
Dwelling 3: Proposed Dwelling 3 is located centrally on the site, with pedestrian access from the common walkway along the western site boundary. The dwelling is designed over three levels and comprises a living/dining room, kitchen, laundry and powder room at ground floor level and two bedrooms with a two-way bathroom and balcony at first floor level.
Dwelling 3 has a bedroom with ensuite and terrace at second floor level.
Dwelling 4: Proposed Dwelling 4 is located in the north-western corner of the site, with pedestrian access from the common walkway along the western site boundary. The dwelling comprises a living/dining room, kitchen, sitting room, laundry, bathroom and bedroom at ground floor level and two bedrooms with ensuites, as well as a media nook, linen closet and balcony at first floor level.
Dwelling 4 is adjacent to the lift and is wheelchair accessible.
Dwelling 5: Proposed Dwelling 5 is located in the north-eastern corner of the site, with pedestrian access from a private walkway off Kochia Lane. The dwelling comprises a living/dining room, kitchen, sitting room, laundry, bathroom and bedroom at ground floor level and two bedrooms with ensuites, as well as a media nook, linen closet and balcony at first floor level.
Strata subdivision of the development is also proposed. The allocation of private open space, common areas and car parking on the strata subdivision plans is consistent with the architectural plans.
Amended plans received 27 October 2011
The amended plans were submitted to address requirements of the KPSO (LEP 194)and DCP 55. The amended plans proposed the following changes:
· reduction in basement size
· revision of layout to Dwelling 2 to address amenity concerns
· amendments to windows of Dwellings 1 and 2
· provision of amended supporting documentation
Amended plans received 21 November 2011
These further amended plans were submitted in response to Council officer’s concerns regarding number of storeys, site frontage, deep soil area, front setback and courtyard setback. The amended plans proposed the following changes and information:
· increase in front setback
· revised deep soil plan
· additional information regarding fencing
· revised BASIX certificate
· provision of SEPP 1 objection
Amended plans received 6 January 2012
These amended plans were submitted in response to Council officer’s concerns regarding compliance with Council’s deep soil provisions and BASIX. The amended plans provided the following changes and information:
· revised BASIX certificate
· landscape BASIX compliance diagram
· revised deep soil diagram
Consultation
Community
Pursuant to Council’s notification requirements, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. In response, submissions from the following were received:
1. Mrs M. Kinnersly – No. 1 Milray Street, LINDFIELD
2. Mrs C. Moulds (Principal Cromehurst Special School – No. 26-28 Tryon Road Lindfield – c/ Mr Andrew Steel, NSW Department of Education, HORNSBY
The submissions raised the following issues:
use of narrow lane by construction vehicles
access to the dwelling and flat No. 1 Milray Street
safe access to Cromehurst School
A Site Management Plan and Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) have been submitted with the application. The Site Management plan indicates that vehicular access to the site will be gained via both Kochia Lane and Tryon Road.
The CTMP indicates that traffic controllers will be situated on the Kochia Lane frontage during the demolition and excavation stages. The traffic controllers will ensure the safety of pedestrians, control traffic movement into and out of the site and control local traffic movements in Kochia Lane.
The CTMP also indicates that all materials are to be stored on site. The site manager will ensure that two deliveries do not occur at the same time and will ensure there is adequate on-site parking available for employees, tradespersons and construction vehicles.
Council’s Development Engineer has reviewed the CTMP and considers it satisfactory, subject to some amendments. It is recommended that a condition be imposed requiring submission of an amended CTMP prior to demolition. The amended CTMP must state that no construction vehicles are to enter or leave the site between 8am and 9.30am (school drop off time) and 2.30pm to 4pm (school pick up time) (Condition 9).
some students have difficulty coping with loud and consistent noise associated with construction activity
Construction hours are standardised across the Ku-ring-gai LGA. Council’s standard construction hours are between 7am and 5pm, Monday to Friday and 8am to 12pm Saturday. It would not be fair or reasonable to the applicant to further restrict construction hours.
It is recommended that Council’s standard condition for noise management be imposed (Condition 26). This condition requires a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1pm where excavation or removal of materials is proposed.
Amended plans received 27 October 2011
The amended plans were not notified to surrounding residents as the proposed amendments did not result in a greater environmental impact than the original proposal.
Within Council
Landscaping
Council's Senior Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer, commented on the amended proposal as follows:
Plans/reports sighted
Plan/document |
Designer |
Drawing No. |
Date |
Architectural |
Gordon Fuller and Assoc |
A00 to A28 Rev 4 |
5/01/12 |
Deep Soil Landscape Area |
Gordon Fuller and Assoc |
A24 Rev 5 |
5/01/12 |
Survey |
Mepstead and Assoc |
4793-DET1 |
24/11/09 |
Stormwater |
Storm Civil Engineering Solutions |
F1–F4 Issue A |
17/10/11 |
Landscape |
Site Design |
10-193 Issue D |
22/12/11 |
BASIX |
Certificate no. |
343505M_07 |
22/12/11 |
SOEE |
Glendinning Minto |
|
October 2011 |
Arborist’s Report |
Footprint Green |
|
18/04/11 |
Deep soil landscape area
A multi-unit housing development, on a site with an area less than 1800m2, requires at least 40% of the site area to be deep soil landscape area.
The deep soil landscape plan indicates that there is 40.4 % (520.2m2) deep soil landscape area (Dwg A24 Rev 5, GGF, 5/01/12).
Tree impacts
An Arboricultural Assessment, prepared by Footprint Green and dated 18/04/11, has been submitted with the application. Tree numbers refer to this report.
Trees to be removed
There are no significant trees proposed to be removed.
The proposed removal of the two 9 metres high Cupressus sp. (Tree 206 and Tree 207), located on the western boundary and in good condition, is supported subject to replacement planting.
All other trees proposed to be removed are less than 8m in height and their removal is supported.
Trees to be retained
Tree 32 is a small Pittosporum undulatum (Sweet Pittosporum) located on the boundary at the north-western corner of the site that will be retained with appropriate conditions. Tree protection for trees on adjoining sites will be conditioned (Condition 12).
Landscape design
Front setback to Tryon Road
The existing 1.8 metres high masonry wall along the front boundary to Tryon Road is proposed to be retained. An area of common area for shrub planting is proposed between the front boundary and the private courtyards of Dwellings 1 and 2. Two canopy trees are proposed within the front setback.
Secondary front setback to Kochia Lane
It is proposed to demolish the existing masonry wall along the Kochia Lane frontage and construct a new 2 metres high masonry wall. The proposed wall is set back 2.8 metres, with a common area for landscaping between the front boundary and the private courtyards of Dwellings 4 and 5. The proposed wall, including the balustrade, will be approximately 1800mm higher than the existing wall. One canopy tree and two medium trees are proposed within the front setback to Kochia Lane.
Common open space
The proposal is consistent with the design objective to have deep soil planting in common areas of the site (Clause O-4, 4.5.5 DCP 55).
Communal open space
A communal area is located within the front setback to Tryon Road. Amenities, such as seating, have not been provided. This is conditioned (Condition 23).
Private open space
The proposal provides generous private courtyards for all dwellings.
Tree replenishment
The development should provide at least four canopy trees. The proposed four canopy trees are all locally occurring native species representative of Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest community.
Screen planting
- Eastern boundary– Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash) 6m, Meleleuca bracteata ‘Revolution Gold’ 5m.
- Western boundary – Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash) 6m.
Stormwater plan
The proposed stormwater design is considered acceptable.
BASIX
The BASIX landscape diagram is considered acceptable.
Conclusion
The proposal is supported with conditions.
Engineering
Council's Development Engineer, commented on the amended proposal as follows:
Amended documentation has been received.
· Glendinning Minto Revised Statement of Environmental Effects, dated October 2011;
· BASIX Certificate 343505M_03 dated 16 November 2011;
· Varga Traffic Planning Traffic and Parking Assessment Report dated 13 October 2011;
· Varga Traffic Planning Construction Traffic Management Plan dated 17 October 2011;
· StormCivil drawings 106003 F1 to F4, all Issue A;
· StormCivil water quality report dated 17 October 2011;
· Architectural drawings by G. Gordon Fuller dated 17/11/11;
Water management
Council’s DCP No. 47 Water management requires 26.2 cubic metres of site storage to be provided for this development. A concession of up to 25% is available depending on the minimum volume of the mandatory rainwater tank.
The Stormwater Management Plan shows that 29 cubic metres of on site detention is provided, which complies with DCP No. 47. The Stormwater Management Plan also shows a 31,500 litres rainwater tank. Both these tanks are located in the basement and have gravity drainage to the gutter in Kochia Lane.
The BASIX water commitments include a 31,000 litre rainwater tank, collecting runoff from 450m2, with re-use for toilet flushing. The stormwater management plan is consistent with the BASIX Certificate.
The basement requires a pump-out system to drain driveway runoff, since the proposed level at RL90.075 is slightly below the street. The pump well has been designed using a three hour duration for the 100 year ARI event (Council’s DCP requires a two hour duration, so this is more than adequate).
The water quality assessment report demonstrates that the rainwater tank, on site detention tank and pit inserts (which are specified on the drawings) will achieve the targets of Section 8 3.1 of DCP No. 47. This is satisfactory.
The drawings by StormCivil and the water quality assessment report should be stamped with the DA stamp and listed in Condition No. 1.
Traffic and parking
The traffic engineer’s report refers to an earlier basement plan (Revision 1), but the current revision (3) does not appear to be much different.
A single width driveway from Kochia Lane is proposed. This is acceptable given the small number of spaces and the gentle slope and good sight distance provided by the driveway.
The site is within 400 metres of Lindfield Station, so five resident and two visitor parking spaces are required. Two spaces are provided for each townhouse, and two additional visitor spaces are proposed. One disabled resident and one disabled visitor parking space is provided.
The double garage to Dwelling 1 is located at the end of the aisle. The aisle width is generous at approximately 7 metres, so there is room for vehicles to turn around in two reversing movements (acceptable for domestic properties under AS2890.1:2004 Off street car parking).
The car park dimensions comply with AS2890.1:2004 Off street car parking and the disabled parking spaces comply with AS2890.6:2009.
A space of sufficient size is provided for service vehicles just inside the entrance. This space is also suitable for the small waste collection vehicle.
Waste management
Provision has been made for internal waste collection. A storage area for containers is shown on the basement, adjacent to the parking space. Section 1 on Drawing A15 Rev 2 indicates that 2.6 metres of headroom will be available within the basement. The security door will have to be configured to allow 2.6 metres clear at the entry top the basement. This is conditioned (Condition 21).
Construction traffic management
Because the site is adjacent to Cromehurst School, the recommended conditions include a restriction on heavy vehicle access to the site during school drop-off and pick-up times.
A Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) has been submitted to address the matters raised during the assessment period. Some matters need further consideration and the recommended conditions still require a CTMP to be submitted prior to commencement of works.
The submitted CTMP states that access for demolition and excavation will be from Kochia Lane and that access for construction, concrete pours etc will be from Tryon Road. Swept path diagrams have been included which show that in theory a truck and trailer combination can enter from Kochia Lane, turn within the site and leave in a forward direction. This does not include turning into Nelson Road and proceeding uphill whilst loaded with spoil. Parked cars either side of Nelson Road would also present an obstruction. It would be desirable for trucks using Kochia Lane to enter and leave in different directions, but it may be more practical to reverse the routes. Traffic controllers are shown in Kochia Lane for this stage, however an additional traffic controller will be required at the Nelson Road intersection if this route is to be used, as well as parking restrictions.
Because of the size of the site, it will be necessary for construction vehicles entering from Tryon Road to reverse into the site under traffic control. The swept path diagrams indicate that a Works Zone or No Parking restriction will have to be implemented between the driveways in Tryon Road, to allow room for the trucks to manoeuvre.
The construction vehicle route has been nominated as being directly to and from Tryon Road via Archbold Road or Eastern Arterial Road. This route, while avoiding the Havilah Street underpass and the Strickland Road bridge, requires the construction vehicles to negotiate the intersection at Nelson Road, the steep section of Tryon Road and the bend at Howard Street. It may be preferable that trucks use the underpass. This can be finalised on the CTMP to be submitted prior to commencement of works.
Council infrastructure
There is no kerb and gutter in Kochia Lane along the site frontage. A condition is recommended that design drawings for kerb and gutter be submitted to Council and approved prior to issue of the Construction Certificate (Condition 22).
Geotechnical investigation
Because of the fall across the site, the depth of excavation varies from zero at the Kochia Lane frontage to about 3 metres at the Tryon Road frontage. The site is underlain by shale below 2-4 metres and sandstone below about 6-9 metres.
The report contains recommendations for excavation methods and support, vibration monitoring and dilapidation survey (Cromehurst School). Groundwater is expected to be below the proposed excavation level.
Conclusion
The application is supported. Strata subdivision is included and conditions are recommended accordingly (Conditions 69-72).
Outside Council
Urban design
Council's Urban Design Consultant has reviewed the amended application against the provisions of SEPP 65 and has provided the following comments:
This report has been prepared to provide architectural and urban design comment on the development application DA0274/11 lodged with Ku-ring-gai Council.
We have previously provided comments on this DA on 6 July 2011, however as the planning instruments which were used to develop the prior design have now been declared invalid, this DA has now been lodged under LEP 194 and DCP No. 55.
This report does not provide any assessment against the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance 2008, LEP 194 or DCP No. 55. The scope is based around State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development.
The applicant’s responses to the prior comments are good and an improvement on the prior scheme.
Principle 1: Context
Good design responds and contributes to its context. Context can be defined as the key natural and built features of an area. Responding to context involves identifying the desirable elements of a location’s current character or, in the case of precincts undergoing a transition, the desired future character as stated in planning and design policies. New buildings will thereby contribute to the quality and identity of the area.
The site is located on the northern side of Tryon Road and is rectangular in shape with two street frontages. The surrounding context is mixed with commercial uses, larger residential flat buildings and detached dwellings.
The adjoining site to the south has had a five storey residential flat building approved while the site to the north has a school and single detached housing [associated with the school.] The context is mixed and higher density due to the proximity to Lindfield town centre and railway station.
As the proposal is for townhouses in a mixed higher density setting, this is appropriate for the existing and future character for the area.
Principle 2: Scale
Good design provides an appropriate scale in terms of the bulk and height that suits the scale of the street and the surrounding buildings.
Establishing an appropriate scale requires a considered response to the scale of existing development. In precincts undergoing a transition, proposed bulk and height needs to achieve the scale identified for the desired future character of the area.
Land around the subject site is zoned 2(d3) under LEP 194 and some sites may be amalgamated (Nos. 20-22), and others not (subject site). As a result, there will be variation in bulk and scale in the immediate area.
The scale of the proposal will sit satisfactorily, as there will be five stories at Nos. 20-22 Tyron Road, two to three storey on the subject site and the existing school on the remaining site zoned 2(d3) in the Tyron Road street block. The scale of the proposal is appropriate.
The scale of the built form will gradually decrease from the town centre area.
Principle 3: Built form
Appropriate built form defines the public domain, contributes to the character of streetscapes and parks, including their views and vistas, and provides internal amenity and outlook.
Generally, the proposed built form is satisfactory. The issue of the non-compliance with the separation between Dwelling 3 and Dwellings 1 and 2 was reviewed thoroughly and no significant impacts on solar access or privacy are evident.
Entry and access from streets
It is commendable that now both Dwellings 1 and 2 have direct access from Tryon Road. It is understandable that this cannot be achieved from the laneway due to changes in level.
Principle 4: Density
Good design has a density appropriate for a site and its context, in terms of floor space yields (or number of units or residents).
Appropriate densities are sustainable and consistent with the existing density in an area or, in precincts undergoing a transition, are consistent with the stated desired future density. Sustainable densities respond to the regional context, availability of infrastructure, public transport, community facilities and environmental quality.
The density of the development is satisfactory.
Principle 5: Resource, energy and water efficiency
Good design makes efficient use of natural resources, energy and water throughout its full life cycle, including construction. Sustainability is integral to the design process. Aspects include demolition of existing structures, recycling of materials, selection of appropriate and sustainable materials, adaptability and reuse of buildings, layouts and built form, passive solar design principles, efficient appliances and mechanical services, soil zones for vegetation and reuse of water.
Satisfactory. Each townhouse receives solar and cross ventilation. Shading elements have been provided to the western edges of the proposal.
Principle 6: Landscape
Good design recognises that together landscape and buildings operate as an integrated and sustainable system, resulting in greater aesthetic quality and amenity for both occupants and the adjoining public domain.
Landscape design builds on the existing site’s natural and cultural features in responsible and creative ways. It enhances the development’s natural environmental performance by co-ordinating water and soil management, solar access, micro-climate, tree canopy and habitat values. It contributes to the positive image and contextual fit of development through respect for streetscape and neighbourhood character, or desired future character.
Landscape design should optimise useability, privacy and social opportunity, equitable access and respect for neighbours’ amenity, and provide for practical establishment and long term management.
The landscape proposal is satisfactory. Larger trees should be planted especially to visually buffer the side boundaries. The choice of tree needs to be considered appropriately for the northern interface with the school.
Principle 7: Amenity
Good design provides amenity through the physical, spatial and environmental quality of a development.
Optimising amenity requires appropriate room dimensions and shapes, access to sunlight, natural ventilation, visual and acoustic privacy, storage, indoor and outdoor space, efficient layouts and service areas, outlook and ease of access for all age groups and degrees of mobility.
The proposal meets the requirement for 70% of apartments receiving solar access and generally the 60% for cross ventilation.
Bedroom 3 of Dwelling 5 has a small courtyard which interfaces with the private open space of Dwelling 3. It would be preferable that this fence was in alignment with the pavers of Dwelling 3 and therefore the current L-shaped space amended to be a rectangular shape. This will provide better visual privacy and separation between the private open spaces to different properties and potential to buffer through using a hedge or similar.
Principle 8: Safety and security
Good design optimises safety and security, both internal to the development and for the public domain.
This is achieved by maximising overlooking of public and communal spaces while maintaining internal privacy, avoiding dark and non-visible areas, maximising activity on streets, providing clear, safe access points, providing quality public spaces that cater for desired recreational uses, providing lighting appropriate to the location and desired activities, and clear definition between public and private spaces.
Good surveillance will be provided to Kochia Lane from Dwellings 4 and 5 from a higher level and from Dwellings 1 and 2 to Tryon Road.
Principle 9: Social dimensions
Good design responds to the social context and needs of the local community in terms of lifestyles, affordability, and access to social facilities.
New developments should optimise the provision of housing to suit the social mix and needs in the neighbourhood or, in the case of precincts undergoing transition, provide for the desired future community. New developments should address housing affordability by optimising the provision of economic housing choices and providing a mix of housing types to cater for different budgets and housing needs.
The proposal provides for a different housing choice which is medium scale, close to existing facilities and services.
Principle 10: Aesthetics
Quality aesthetics require the appropriate composition of building elements, textures, materials and colours and reflect the use, internal design and structure of the development. Aesthetics should respond to the environment and context, particularly to desirable elements of the existing streetscape or, in precincts undergoing transition, contribute to the desired future character of the area.
The street elevations to Tryon Road have been improved. The amendments to the fenestration and their relationship to the lower level doors provide balance to these facades.
The introduction of a street level entry for Dwelling 2 also balances the presentation to the main street frontage and provides better articulation and activation.
The Kochia Lane elevations are less successful and the windows are set at 1200mm above finished slab level unlike the 1 metre on the Tryon Road frontage. A revision in this regard could be considered.
The proposed courtyard brick wall to the Kochia Lane private open spaces appears to be higher in the photomontage than the previous sections and elevations for the scheme. If this is the case, the height should be returned to the original to allow for daylight access and views of the facade articulation and surveillance of the street.
Recommendations
· relocate the fence to the proposed courtyard between Dwelling 5 Bedroom 3 to be in alignment with the pavers Dwelling 3 private open space.
· consider lowering the windows on the Kochia Lane first floor elevations to be a metre above finished slab level similar to those on the Tryon Road elevations
Planning comment: Council’s Landscape Officer has reviewed the
proposed landscaping adjacent to the property boundaries and has raised no
objection. A number of trees are proposed adjacent to the shared property
boundary with the school, including a Turpentine (capable of growing to a
height of 18) and two Blueberry Ash (capable of growing to a height of 8m).
The height of the brick courtyard wall to Dwellings 4 and 5 has not changed. The windows on the Kochia Lane frontage at first floor level have been amended to be 1 metre above finished slab level. The applicant was asked to relocate the courtyard fence between Dwellings 3 and 5, though declined to do so on the grounds that the area would provide greater amenity as part of the private open space to Dwelling 3. This issue is not tantamount to approval of the application and the applicant’s submission is accepted.
Statutory Provisions
State Environmental Planning Policies
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65 - Design quality of residential flat development
SEPP 65 aims to improve the design quality of residential flat buildings across NSW and provides an assessment framework, the Residential Flat Design Code (RFDC) for assessing ‘good design.’
Clause 50(1A) of the EPA Regulation 2000 requires the submission of a design verification statement from the building designer at lodgement of the development application. This documentation has been submitted and is satisfactory.
The SEPP requires the assessment of any development application for residential flat development against 10 principles contained in clauses 9-18 and Council is also required to consider the matters contained in the publication “Residential Flat Design Code.”
Residential Flat Design Code Compliance Table
Pursuant to Clause 30(2) of SEPP 65 in determining a development application for a residential flat building the consent authority is to take into consideration the Residential Flat Design Code (RFDC). The following table is an assessment of the proposal against the guidelines provided in the RFDC.
|
Guideline |
Consistency with Guideline |
PART 02 SITE DESIGN |
||
Site Configuration |
|
|
Deep Soil Zones |
A minimum of 25 percent of the open space area of a site should be a deep soil zone; more is desirable. Exceptions may be made in urban areas where sites are built out and there is no capacity for water infiltration. In these instances, stormwater treatment measures must be integrated with the design of the residential flat building. |
YES
The proposal provides 40.4% Deep Soil area. |
Fences + walls |
Define the edges between public and private land to provide privacy and security and contribute positively to the public domain. |
YES
The existing vegetation covered fence adjacent to the Tryon Road frontage is to be retained. A new masonry wall is proposed adjacent to the Kochia Lane frontage.
|
Open Space |
The area of communal open space required should generally be at least between 25 and 30 percent of the site area. Larger sites and brown field sites may have potential for more than 30 percent. |
YES
Communal open space has been provided in accordance with DCP No. 55
|
|
The minimum recommended area of private open space for each apartment at ground level or similar space on a structure, such as on a podium or car park, is 25m2 .
|
YES
All terraces have been provided with private open space of at least 35m2.
|
Orientation |
Optimise solar access, contribute positively to desired streetscape character, support landscape design with consolidated open space areas, protect amenity of existing development and improve thermal efficiency. |
YES
The development ensures adequate solar access to the development and adjoining land.
|
Planting on Structures |
In terms of soil provision there is no minimum standard that can be applied to all situations as the requirements vary with the size of plants and trees at maturity. The following are recommended as minimum standards for a range of plant sizes:
Medium trees (8 metres canopy diameter at maturity) - minimum soil volume 35 cubic metres - minimum soil depth 1 metre - approximate soil area 6 metres x 6 metres or equivalent
|
YES
The landscape plan is considered satisfactory by Council’s Landscape Officer. |
Stormwater management |
Minimise impact on the health and amenity of natural waterways, preserve existing topographic and natural features and minimise the discharge of sediment and other pollutants to the stormwater drainage system. |
YES
The proposed stormwater management plan is supported by Council’s Development Engineer.
|
Visual Privacy |
Refer to Building Separation minimum standards
- up to four storeys/12 metres - 12 metres between habitable rooms/balconies - 9 metres between habitable/balconies and non-habitable rooms - 6 metres between non-habitable rooms - five to eight storeys/up to 25 metres - 18 metres between habitable rooms/balconies - 13 metres between habitable rooms/balconies and non-habitable rooms - 9 metres between non-habitable rooms |
YES
Building separation between Dwellings 1 and 2 and 3 is adequate. Whilst building separation is less than 12m, there are no opposing windows or adverse privacy impacts. |
Building Entry |
Create entrances which provide a desirable residential identity, provide clear orientation for visitors and contribute positively to the streetscape and building façade design. |
YES
Individual access points have been provided for Dwellings 1, 2 and 5. A separate vehicular entrance is proposed.
|
Parking |
Provide adequate parking for occupants, visitors and disabled. |
YES
The proposal provides adequate parking facilities.
|
Pedestrian Access
|
Identify the access requirements from the street or car parking area to the apartment entrance.
|
YES
Private and public access points are proposed from each frontage and the basement.
|
|
Follow the accessibility standard set out in Australian Standard AS 1428 (parts 1 and 2), as a minimum.
Provide barrier free access to at least 20 percent of dwellings in the development. |
YES
A lift has been provided from the basement to ground floor level. |
Vehicle Access
|
Generally limit the width of driveways to a maximum of six metres.
|
YES
The proposed driveway is less than 6m in width.
|
|
Locate vehicle entries away from main pedestrian entries and on secondary frontages.
|
YES
Vehicular access is provided from the secondary street frontage (Kochia Lane).
|
PART 03 BUILDING DESIGN |
||
Building Configuration |
|
|
Apartment layout |
Single-aspect apartments should be limited in depth to 8 metres from a window. |
YES
No single aspect dwellings are proposed.
|
|
The back of a kitchen should be no more than 8 metres from a window. |
YES
All kitchens have external openings.
|
|
The width of cross-over or cross-through apartments over 15 metres deep should be 4 metres or greater to avoid deep narrow apartment layouts. |
YES
All dwellings have a width in excess of 4m.
|
|
If Council chooses to standardise apartment sizes, a range of sizes that do not exclude affordable housing should be used. As a guide, the Affordable Housing Service suggest the following minimum apartment sizes, which can contribute to housing affordability: (apartment size is only one factor influencing affordability)
- 1 bedroom apartment 50m² - 2 bedroom apartment 70m² - 3 bedroom apartment 95m² |
YES
All dwellings meet the appropriate size requirements. |
Apartment Mix |
Include a mixture of unit types for increased housing choice. |
YES
The proposal includes: 2 x two bedroom dwellings and 3 x three bedroom dwellings.
|
Balconies |
Provide primary balconies for all apartments with a minimum depth of 2 metres. Developments which seek to vary from the minimum standards must demonstrate that negative impacts from the context-noise, wind – can be satisfactorily mitigated with design solutions. |
YES
All balconies within the development satisfy the minimum depth provisions.
|
Ceiling Heights |
The following recommended minimum dimensions are measured from finished floor level (FFL) to finished ceiling level (FCL). · in residential flat buildings or other residential floors in mixed use buildings: · in general, 2.7 metres minimum for all habitable rooms on all floors, 2.4 metres is the preferred minimum for all non-habitable rooms, however 2.25m is permitted. |
YES
All habitable rooms have adequate internal dimensions.
|
Ground Floor Apartments |
Optimise the number of ground floor apartments with separate entries and consider requiring an appropriate percentage of accessible units. This relates to the desired streetscape and topography of the site.
|
YES
All dwellings have ground floor entries.
|
|
Provide ground floor apartments with access to private open space, preferably as a terrace or garden.
|
YES
All dwellings have direct
access to private open space areas which include courtyards. |
Storage |
In addition to kitchen cupboards and bedroom wardrobes, provide accessible storage facilities at the following rates:
- studio apartments 6m³ - one-bedroom apartments 6m³ - two-bedroom apartments 8m³ - three plus bedroom apartments 10m³
|
YES
All dwellings have ample storage area within the dwelling and at basement level. |
Building Amenity |
|
|
Acoustic Privacy |
Ensure a high level of amenity by protecting the privacy of residents within apartments and private open space |
YES
The proposal is satisfactory with regard to acoustic privacy. Physical separation has been provided between living areas and bedrooms.
|
Daylight Access |
Living rooms and private open spaces for at least 70 percent of apartments in a development should receive a minimum of three hours direct sunlight between 9 am and 3 pm in mid winter. |
NO
60% of dwellings receive 3 hours of solar access to their living areas. However, all dwellings are afforded sufficient residential amenity.
|
|
Limit the number of single-aspect apartments with a southerly aspect (SW-SE) to a maximum of 10% of the total units proposed. |
YES
No single aspect dwellings are proposed.
|
Natural Ventilation |
Building depths, which support natural ventilation typically, range from 10 to 18 metres.
|
YES
Each dwelling has a depth of less than 18m.
|
|
Sixty percent (60%) of residential units should be naturally cross ventilated. |
YES
All dwellings are cross-ventilated.
|
Building Performance |
|
|
Waste Management |
Supply waste management plans as part of the development application submission as per the NSW Waste Board.
|
YES
|
Water Conservation |
Rainwater is not to be collected from roofs coated with lead- or bitumen-based paints, or from asbestos- cement roofs. Normal guttering is sufficient for water collections provided that it is kept clear of leaves and debris. |
YES
|
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land
The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
A valid BASIX certificate has been submitted. The certificate demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the SEPP and adequately reflects all amendments to the application.
Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005
Matters for consideration under SREP 2005 include biodiversity, ecology and environmental protection, public access to and scenic qualities of foreshores and waterways, maintenance of views, control of boat facilities and maintenance of a working harbour. The proposal is not in close proximity to, or within view, of a waterway or wetland and is considered satisfactory. Water re-use measures will minimise the impact on downstream waterways.
Local Content (LEP, KPSO, etc)
Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance
Part A: Development
Development standard |
Proposed |
Complies |
Site area (min): 1300.6m2 |
1300.6m2 |
YES |
Deep landscaping (min): 40% (site area less than 1,800m2) |
40.4% site area |
YES |
Street frontage (min): 23m (less than 1,800m2) |
21.335m |
NO |
Number of storeys (max): 3 |
4 storeys |
NO |
Site coverage (max): 40% |
37.7% or 489.9m2 |
YES |
Top floor area (max): 60% of level below |
The proposed development is not a residential flat building. |
N/A |
Storeys and ceiling height (max): 3 storeys and 10.4m |
3 storeys & 9.8m |
YES |
Car parking spaces (min): 1 per 4 dwellings (visitors) = 5 spaces 1 per dwelling (residents) 6 spaces (total) |
Two visitor spaces proposed Two car spaces per dwelling 10 spaces total |
YES YES YES |
Zone interface setback (min): 9m |
The adjoining sites are zoned 2(d3) |
N/A |
Manegeable housing (min): 10% = 1 dwelling |
Dwelling 4 is manageable housing |
YES |
Lift access: required if greater than three storeys |
Lift access proposed |
YES |
Site frontage:
Clause 25I(3) states that sites to be used for multi-unit housing with an area of less than 1800m2 should have a minimum street frontage of 23m. The subject site has a width of 21.335m and does not comply with this requirement.
A SEPP No. 1 objection has been submitted by the applicant and is assessed as follows:
whether the planning control is a development standard
Clause 25I(3) requires a minimum street frontage of 23m for multi-unit housing on lots of less than 1800m2.
Clause 25I(3) is a development standard.
whether compliance with the standard is consistent with the aims of the policy and whether compliance hinders the attainment of objects specified in section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the EP & A Act
The aim of SEPP No.1 is to:
Provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating by virtue of development standards in circumstances where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act.
In this regard the objects of Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act are:
(a) To encourage
(i) The proper management, development and conservation of natural and artificial resources, including agricultural land, natural areas, forests, minerals, water, cities, towns and villages for the purpose of promoting the social and economic welfare of the community and a better environment;
(ii) The promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic
use and development of land;
The non-compliance with the development standard in this instance would not
hinder the attainment of the above planning objectives.
whether compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case
The following is an extract from the applicant’s SEPP No. 1 objection:
It is considered unreasonable and unnecessary to insist on compliance with the minimum street frontage standard as this would result in the objective of the multi-uni housing zone for this site being unsustainable and unachievable.
The proposed development has been assessed as satisfying all of the planning objectives for the site on a merit assessment.
The proposed development would not cause any loss of amenity to existing and future residents, nor would the development result in unacceptable streetscape impacts.
In summary, it would be unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case for Council to insist on compliance with the minimum street frontage requirement as the proposal will otherwise satisfy the planning outcomes as identified in clause 25I(1) of the KPSO.
Comment: It is agreed that compliance with the development standard is unnecessary and unreasonable in the circumstances of the case. The subject site is zoned Residential 2(d3) and development of the subject site does not result in any isolated sites. The adjoining site at No. 26-28 Tryon Road has a site area in excess of 1,200m2 and could be developed on its own.
Furthermore, reference is made to clause 25I(4) of the KPSO which states as follows:
Despite clause 25E, multi-unit housing may be carried out within zone 2(d3) on a site that has a site area of less than 1,200m2, or a street frontage of less than 23 metres, if the proposed development complies with all other requirements of this Ordinance.
The intention of this clause is to allow development of multi-unit housing on smaller sites, subject to compliance with the relevant standards and objectives. This clause does not apply for the proposed development as the proposal involves a technical non-compliance relating to maximum number of storeys. A separate SEPP No. 1 objection has been submitted for this non-compliance.
The proposed development satisfies the heads of consideration listed under clause 25I(1) and satisfies the objectives of LEP 194.
whether the objection is well founded
The submitted SEPP No. 1 objection is considered to be well founded.
Maximum number of storeys
Clause 25(5) provides for a maximum of three storeys for developments on a site of less than 1800m2. The proposed development has a maximum height of four storeys and does not comply with this requirement.
A SEPP No. 1 objection has been submitted by the applicant and is assessed as follows:
whether the planning control is a development standard
Clause 25I(5) limits the number of storeys to three with respect to multi-unit
housing development on land having a site area of less than 1,800m2 and is considered to be a development standard as defined by Section 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.
whether compliance with the standard is consistent with the aims of the policy and whether compliance hinders the attainment of objects specified in section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the EP & A Act
The aim of SEPP No.1 is to:
Provide flexibility in the application of planning controls operating by virtue of development standards in circumstances where strict compliance with those standards would, in any particular case, be unreasonable or unnecessary or tend to hinder the attainment of the objects specified in Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act.
In this regard the objects of Section 5(a)(i) and (ii) of the Act are:
(a) To encourage
(i) The proper management, development and conservation of natural and artificial resources, including agricultural land, natural areas, forests, minerals, water, cities, towns and villages for the purpose of promoting the social and economic welfare of the community and a better environment;
(ii) The promotion and co-ordination of the orderly and economic
use and development of land;
The non-compliance with the development standard in this instance would not
hinder the attainment of the above planning objectives.
whether compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case
The following is an extract from the applicant’s SEPP No. 1 objection:
It is considered unreasonable and unnecessary to insist on compliance with the number of storeys standard because the breach is technical and is as a result of the existing excavated ground levels associated with the basement garage and existing excavated ground levels on the site.
The variation is located at the rear of the site generally below proposed dwelling 5 and as detailed in Drawing No. A11 - Elevations and Drawing No. A15 -Sections. Except for the existence of this excavated area, there would be no breach of the standard.
The breach does not result in any adverse impact to the street or adjoining properties.
The resultant building height will be observed as having two storeys with Dwelling 3 being the three storey component, in the centre of the site.
Comment: The proposed non-compliance is a result of the existing excavated garage which results in the proposed basement having a height of more than 1.2 metres above ground level at the northern corner of the site (Figure 1). As a result of this anomaly, the entire basement must be classified as a storey and the development has a maximum height of four storeys (Figure 2). Nonetheless, the development appears from the street and adjoining properties as having a height of two to three storeys and will not result in any adverse impacts with regard to visual bulk or solar access. For these reasons, it is agreed that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case.
whether the objection is well founded
The submitted SEPP No. 1 objection is considered to be well founded.
Figure 1: Section showing existing excavated area and basement height over 1.2m
Figure 2: Section showing all storeys
Part B: Residential zone objectives:
The development satisfies the objectives for residential zones as prescribed in clause 25D.
Policy Provisions
Development Control Plan No. 55 – Railway/Pacific Highway Corridor & St Ives Centre
Development control |
Proposed |
Complies |
Part 4.1 Landscape design: |
||
Deep soil landscaping (min) |
|
|
150m2 per 1000m2 of site area = 300m2 |
40.4% (520.2m2 |
YES |
No. of tall trees required (min): 4 trees required |
4 trees proposed |
YES |
Part 4.2 Density: |
||
Building footprint (max): |
|
|
40% of total site area |
37.6% |
YES |
Floor space ratio (max): |
|
|
0.8:1 |
0.8:1 |
YES |
Part 4.3 Setbacks: |
||
Street boundary setback (min): |
|
|
between 10 and 12 metres (<40% of the zone occupied by building footprint) |
Building comprises 40% of 10m-12m setback zone from Tryon Road |
YES |
Rear boundary setback (min): |
|
|
6m |
6.5m to built elements, 6m to paving
|
YES |
Side boundary setback (min): |
|
|
3m to building or 6m to windows of habitable rooms |
building set back 3.61m from north-eastern boundary & 3.61m from south-western boundary
windows to habitable rooms set back 3.61m from north-eastern boundary & 3.61m from south-western boundary
|
YES
NO |
Setback of ground floor courtyards to street boundary (min): |
8m |
YES |
8m |
|
|
total area of front setback occupied by private courtyards (max): |
19% front setback occupied by private courtyards |
NO |
15% |
|
|
Part 4.4 Built form and articulation: |
||
Façade articulation: |
|
|
§ Wall plane depth >600mm |
>600mm |
YES |
§ Wall plane area <81m2 |
<81m2 |
YES |
Built form: |
|
|
§ Building width < 36m |
the building is 13.5m in width |
YES |
§ Balcony projection < 1.2m |
balconies project 0.6m |
YES |
Part 4.5 Residential amenity |
||
Solar access: |
|
|
§ >70% of units receive 3+ hours direct sunlight in winter solstice |
Dwelling 1: Sunlight to POS from 9.45am to 12.45pm; living area from 9.45am to 12.45pm
Dwelling 2: Sunlight to part of private open space at 9-10am and 2-3pm and half of living area at 2-3pm
Dwelling 3: Sunlight to POS from 9.45am to 12.45pm; living area from 10.45am to 11.45am
Dwelling 4: Sunlight to POS from 9am to 3pm, living area from 9am to 3pm
Dwelling 5: Sunlight to POS from 9am to 3pm, living area from 9am to 3pm |
Refer discussion below
|
§ >50% of the principle common open space of the development receives 3+ hours direct sunlight in the winter solstice |
Common open space adjacent to north-eastern side boundary receives 3+ hours solar access |
YES |
§ <15% of the total units are single aspect with a western orientation |
No dwellings are single aspect with a western orientation |
YES |
Visual privacy: |
|
|
Separation b/w windows and balconies of a building and any neighbouring building on site or adjoining site: |
|
|
Storeys 1 to 4 § 12m b/w habitable rooms § 9m b/w habitable and non-habitable rooms § 6m b/w non-habitable rooms |
Windows are offset. |
YES
|
Internal amenity: |
|
|
§ Habitable rooms have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 2.7m |
2.9m |
YES |
§ Non-habitable rooms have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 2.4m |
min. 2.4m (bathroom to dwelling 3)
|
YES
|
§ 1-2 bedroom units have a minimum plan dimension of 3m in all bedroom |
Dwelling 1: 3.8m Dwelling 2: 3.2m Dwelling 3: 3m Dwelling 4: 3.1m Dwelling 5: 3.1m |
YES |
§ Single corridors: - serve a maximum of 8 units - >1.5m wide - >1.8m wide at lift lobbies |
No shared internal corridors proposed.
|
YES
|
Outdoor living: |
|
|
§ ground floor apartments have a terrace or private courtyard greater than 25m2 in area |
>25m2 POS proposed for each dwelling
|
YES |
§ primary outdoor space has a minimum dimension of 2.4m |
min. dimension 5.5m |
YES |
Part 4.7 Social dimensions: |
||
Visitable units (min): |
|
|
70% |
Dwellings 1, 2, 3 and 4 are visitable. |
YES |
Part 4.8 Resource, energy and water efficiency: |
||
Energy efficiency: |
|
|
§ >65% of units are to have natural cross ventilation |
All dwellings feature cross-ventilation. |
YES |
§ 25% of kitchens are to have an external wall for natural ventilation and light |
>25% |
YES |
Part 5 Parking and vehicular access: |
||
Car parking (min): |
|
|
1 per 4 dwellings (visitors) = 5 spaces 1 per dwelling (residents) 6 spaces (total) |
10 resident spaces 2 visitor spaces 12 spaces |
YES YES YES |
Setbacks (s.4.3)
Side setbacks
For buildings with a height of three storeys or less on sites less than 1800m2, section 4.3 of DCP No. 55 requires side setbacks of 3m or 6m to windows of habitable rooms. The objective of this requirement is to maintain a high level of residential amenity between buildings.
The proposed development is set back a minimum of 3.61m from the north-eastern and south-western side boundaries and complies with the first part of this requirement. However, the proposal includes a number of windows that are set back less than 6m from the side boundaries at ground and first floor levels and does not comply in this regard. The proposed non-compliances are as follows:
Ground floor: Kitchen windows to Dwellings 4 and 5 from north-eastern and south-western boundaries, kitchen window to Dwelling 3 from south-western boundary, living/dining room and sitting room windows of Dwellings 1 and 2 from north-eastern and south-western side boundaries.
First floor: Media nook and stairwell windows to Dwellings 4 and 5 from north-eastern and south-western boundaries, bedroom windows to Dwelling 3 from south-western boundary, bedroom and ensuite windows of Dwellings 1 and 2 from north-eastern and south-western side boundaries.
In this instance, the proposed non-compliances are a result of the narrow site width. The site has a width of 21.335m, which is less than the required site frontage of 23m for multi-unit housing. Adequate screen planting is proposed along both side boundaries and the proposed development will not result in adverse privacy impacts to the adjoining school to the north-east or the residential flat building to the south-west. The proposed non-compliances are therefore acceptable.
Size of courtyards within front setback
Section 4.3 of DCP No. 55 states that no more than 15% of the front setback is to be occupied by private terraces/courtyards. The objective of this requirement is to ensure there is adequate common area for the establishment and maintenance of canopy trees.
The proposed courtyards for Dwellings 1 and 2 account for 19% of the front setback area and do not comply with Council’s numerical requirement. Nonetheless, the courtyards are modest in size and are not the primary area of open space for the dwellings. Sufficient common area is proposed within the front setback, which includes turf, shrubs, small trees and canopy trees. The proposal complies with Council’s tree replenishment requirement of four canopy trees, with half of these trees provided within the front setback. The proposal is therefore considered to comply with the objective of section 4.3 and is satisfactory.
Solar access (s.4.5.1)
The objective of Section 4.5.1 is to ensure natural lighting of all living spaces and of adjoining properties. The prescriptive control requires 70% of apartments to receive three hours direct sunlight on 21 June to living room windows or adjacent balconies between 9am and 3pm.
As DCP No. 55 does not specifically provide requirements for solar access to townhouses, an assessment has been undertaken against the above requirements. In this instance, 60% of the proposed dwellings (Dwellings 1, 4 and 5) receive three hours solar access to their living areas. Only Dwellings 2 and 3 do not comply with this requirement.
Dwelling 2 receives solar access to its living area between approximately 9am and 11am and again between approximately 2pm and 3pm. This non-compliance is largely a product of its location in the south-western corner of the site. Whilst the private open space for Dwelling 2 was originally located within the front setback, following the advice of Council's Urban Design Consultant, the proposal was reconfigured to allow for private open space to the rear of the dwelling. It is also noted that the amenity of the dwelling, being a large townhouse with a substantial area of private open space, is significantly greater than that of an apartment and it is considered that the dwelling allows for satisfactory residential amenity.
Dwelling 3 receives solar access to its living area between approximatey10.45am and 11.45am. However, Dwelling 3 also benefits from a large area of private open space (>35m2) which receives three hours of solar access, as well as a second storey terrace, 50% of which receives solar access between 12pm and 3pm. Together, these areas receive sufficient solar access and contribute to a high level of residential amenity.
It is noted that the above controls are usually applied to residential flat buildings comprised of a large number of units. Compliance is therefore more difficult to achieve for the subject development which comprises a smaller number of dwellings. Similarly, Council's requirements for solar access to areas of common space should be assessed differently for a townhouse development than they would for a residential flat building. The DCP requires 50% of the principal area of common open space to receive solar access for 3 hours between 9am and 3pm. The proposed development features two areas of common open space which receive solar access at different times of the day (within the Tryon Road frontage and to the north-east of Dwelling 4).
Notwithstanding this, each of the proposed townhouses features a large area of private open space (>35m2) and the majority of dwellings (Dwellings 1, 3, 4 and 5) receive three hours of solar access to their private open space. The primary area of private open space for each unit is located adjacent to the main living areas and the areas of private open space are either located at the front or rear of the dwelling. The private open spaces are generous, suitably landscaped and maintain a pleasant and attractive living environment for the occupants. Council's Urban Design Consultant supports the configuration of the development and has raised no concerns with regard to residential amenity. The proposed development meets the objectives of section 4.5.1 and is considered satisfactory with regard to solar access.
The proposal retains adequate solar access to all adjoining properties.
Section 94 Plan
The development attracts a section 94 contribution of $92,422.32, which is required to be paid by Condition 24.
It is noted that there is an existing two bedroom granny flat located on the site. The granny flat has an area of less than 60m2. Section 1.25 Ku-ring-gai Contribitions Plan 2010 states that development for the purposes of a secondary dwelling is exempt from the plan where the secondary dwelling is integral and subordinate to the primary dwelling and cannot be subdivided. The existing granny flat is subordinate to the primary dwelling and could not be subdivided. On this basis, no credit has been given for the existing granny flat.
Likely Impacts
The proposed development will not result in any adverse streetscape, privacy, solar access, stormwater or tree impacts.
Suitability of the Site
The site is zoned Residential 2d(3) and is suitable for high density residential development. The proposed development appears from the street as two to three storeys and provides an appropriate transition between the residential flat building under construction to the south-west of the site and the existing low density educational establishment to the north-east. The proposal is therefore suitable for the site.
Public Interest
The approval of the application is considered to be in the in the public interest.
All submissions received have been considered in the assessment of this application.
Conclusion
Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.
THAT the Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the objections under State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards to clauses 25I(3) and 25I(5) of the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance are well founded. The Council is of the opinion that strict compliance with clause 25I(3) concerning minimum street frontage is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case as the subject site is zoned for high density development. The Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with clause25I(5) concerning building height is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of this case as the proposed non-compliance is a result of existing site conditions and will not result in any adverse visual bulk or solar access impacts to adjoining properties.
AND
THAT the Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the objections under SEPP No. 1 are well founded and also being of the opinion that the granting of consent to DA0274/11 is consistent with the aims of the Policy, grant development consent to DA0274/11 for Demolition of existing dwelling and granny flat and erection of 5 townhouses, parking, landscaping and strata subdivision on land at No. 24 Tryon Road Lindfield, for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:
Conditions that identify approved plans:
1. Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
2. Inconsistency between documents
In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:
3. Road opening permit
The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.
Reason: Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.
4. Notice of commencement
At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
5. Notification of builder’s details
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:
Public infrastructure
· Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Tryon Road, Milray Street and Kochia Lane over the site frontage, including the full intersections. · All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.
The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.
The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.
7. Archival recording of buildings
Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that an archival report has been submitted to Council’s Heritage Advisor.
The report must consist of an archival standard photographic record of the building (internally and externally), its garden and views of it from the street illustrating its relationship to neighbouring properties and the streetscape. Recording shall be undertaken in accordance with the guidelines for “Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006)” prepared by the New South Wales Heritage Office.
Information shall be bound in an A4 report format. It shall include copies of photographs, referenced to plans of the site. Two (2) copies (one (1) copy to include negatives or CD of images shall be submitted to Council's Heritage Advisor. The recording document will be held in the local studies collection of Ku-ring-gai Library, the local historical society and Council’s files.
Note: A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
Reason: To ensure the proper management of historical artefacts and to ensure their preservation.
8. Dilapidation survey and report (private property)
Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:
The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.
In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.
Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.
Reason: To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.
9. Construction and traffic management plan
The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.
The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.
The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors. The CTMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions. If parking restrictions are required to facilitate construction vehicle movements, either in Tryon Road, Nelson Road or Milray Street , these must be approved and paid for prior to approval of the CTMP.
The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points. Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metres long heavy rigid vehicle.
The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder). One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:
· Demolition · Excavation · Concrete pour · Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath · Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.
Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.
For pedestrian and traffic safety and amenity, no construction vehicles are to enter or leave the site or travel in Tryon Road, Milray Street or Kochia Lane between school drop-off (8.00-9.30am) and pick-up (2.30-4.00pm) times.
When a satisfactory CTMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached. Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved CTMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council. Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines may be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.
10. Work zone
A Works Zone is to be provided in Tryon Road, subject to the approval of the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee.
No loading or unloading must be undertaken from the public road or nature strip unless within a Works Zone which has been approved and paid for.
In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.
Reason: To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.
11. Erosion and drainage management
Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.
Reason: To preserve and enhance the natural environment.
12. Tree protection fencing
To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area. The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.
The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacings and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.
Reason: To protect existing trees during construction phase.
13. Tree protection signage
Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction. Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:
Tree protection zone.
· This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted. · Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report. · The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available. · The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council. · The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
14. Tree protection mulching
Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
15. Tree fencing inspection
Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.
Reason: To protect existing trees during the construction phase.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:
16. Long service levy
In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
17. Builder’s indemnity insurance
The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.
It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $12,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $12,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).
Reason: Statutory requirement.
18. Stormwater management plan
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must submit, for approval by the Principal Certifying Authority, scale construction plans and specifications in relation to the stormwater management and disposal system for the development. The plan(s) must be based on StormCivil drawings 106003 F1 to F4, all Issue A; and must include the following detail:
· exact location and reduced level of discharge point to the public drainage system · layout of the property drainage system components, including but not limited to (as required) gutters, downpipes, spreaders, pits, swales, kerbs, cut-off and intercepting drainage structures, subsoil drainage, flushing facilities and all ancillary stormwater plumbing - all designed for a 235mm/hour rainfall intensity for a duration of five (5) minutes (1:50 year storm recurrence) · location(s), dimensions and specifications for the required rainwater storage and reuse tanks and systems and where proprietary products are to be used, manufacturer specifications or equivalent shall be provided · specifications for reticulated pumping facilities (including pump type and manufacturer specifications) and ancillary plumbing to fully utilise rainwater in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Council Development Control Plan 47 and/or BASIX commitments · details of the required on-site detention tanks required by Ku-ring-gai Water Management DCP 47, including dimensions, materials, locations, orifice and discharge control pit details as required (refer Chapter 6 and Appendices 2, 3 and 5 of DCP 47 for volume, PSD and design requirements) · the required basement stormwater pump-out system is to cater for driveway runoff and subsoil drainage (refer appendix 7.1.1 of Development Control Plan 47 for design)
The above construction drawings and specifications are to be prepared by a qualified and experienced civil/hydraulic engineer in accordance with Council’s Water Management Development Control Plan 47, Australian Standards 3500.2 and 3500.3 - Plumbing and Drainage Code and the Building Code of Australia.
Reason: To protect the environment.
19. Excavation for services
Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.
Note: A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees.
20. Driveway crossing levels
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993. All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".
Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.
This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements. The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.
The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.
Reason: To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
21. Basement car parking details
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:
· all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-street car parking” · a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (required under DCP40 for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement · no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans
Reason: To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.
22. Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)
Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in Kochia Lane:
· Construction of kerb and gutter for the full site frontage.
Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve. The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.
The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works. Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 – 1996 – Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads – Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.
A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.
Reason: To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.
23. Seating in communal open space
Two x three seater bench seats are to provided within the communal open space within the Tryon Road setback, one at the north-eastern end and one at the south-western end. Details are to be shown on the architectural and landscape plans to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority, prior to issue of the Construction Certificate .
Reason: To enhance residential amenity within the communal open space.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):
24. Infrastructure restorations fee
To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:
a) All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.
b) The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.
c) The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.
d) In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.
e) In this condition:
“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and
“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.
Reason: To maintain public infrastructure.
25. Section 94 Contributions - Centres. (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010)
This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:
The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.
The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index. Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.
Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 may be viewed at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au and at the Council Chambers.
Reason: To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.
Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:
26. Prescribed conditions
The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:
· The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia · In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
27. Hours of work
Demolition, excavation, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.
Excavation or removal of any materials using machinery of any kind, including compressors and jack hammers, must be limited to between 7.30am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon 1.00pm.
Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.
Note: Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.
Reason: To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.
28. Approved plans to be on site
A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.
29. Site notice
A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.
The site notice must:
· be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted · display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer · be durable and weatherproof · display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice · be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted
Reason: To ensure public safety and public information.
30. Dust control
During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:
· physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust · earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed · all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations · the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs · all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust · all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays · gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth · cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily
Reason: To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.
31. Further geotechnical input
The geotechnical and hydro-geological works implementation, inspection, testing and monitoring program for the excavation and construction works must be in accordance with the report by Jeffery and Katauskas. Over the course of the works, a qualified geotechnical/hydro-geological engineer must complete the following:
· further geotechnical investigations and testing recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary · further monitoring and inspection at the hold points recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary · written report(s) including certification(s) of the geotechnical inspection, testing and monitoring programs
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
32. Compliance with submitted geotechnical report
A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.
Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:
· appropriate excavation method and vibration control · support and retention of excavated faces · hydro-geological considerations
must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Jeffery and Katauskas. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).
Reason: To ensure the safety and protection of property.
33. Use of road or footpath
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand. The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations. Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.
Reason: To ensure safety and amenity of the area.
34. Guarding excavations
All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
35. Toilet facilities
During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
36. Protection of public places
If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.
If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.
The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.
Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.
Reason: To protect public places.
37. Recycling of building material (general)
During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.
Reason: To facilitate recycling of materials.
38. Construction signage
All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:
· are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent · are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time · are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken · refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken · are restricted to one such sign per property · do not exceed 2.5m2 · are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works
Reason: To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.
39. Road reserve safety
All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site. Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.
Reason: To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.
40. Road repairs necessitated by excavation and construction works
It is highly likely that damage will be caused to the roadway at or near the subject site as a result of the construction (or demolition or excavation) works. The applicant, owner and builder (and demolition or excavation contractor as appropriate) will be held responsible for repair of such damage, regardless of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee paid (this fee is to cover wear and tear on Council's wider road network due to heavy vehicle traffic, not actual major damage).
Section 102(1) of the Roads Act states “A person who causes damage to a public road is liable to pay to the appropriate roads authority the cost incurred by that authority in making good the damage.”
Council will notify when road repairs are needed, and if they are not carried out within 48 hours, then Council will proceed with the repairs, and will invoice the applicant, owner and relevant contractor for the balance.
Reason: To protect public infrastructure.
41. Services
Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.
Reason: Provision of utility services.
42. Drainage to street
Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the street drainage system. New drainage line connections to the street drainage system shall conform and comply with the requirements of Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47.
Reason: To protect the environment.
43. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
44. Arborist’s report
The trees to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a Project Arborist who must be a qualified (AQF) Level 5 arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites. Regular inspections and documentation from the Project Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required including at the following times or phases of work. All monitoring shall be recorded and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to completion of the works.
Reason: To ensure protection of existing trees.
45. Canopy/root pruning
Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree(s) which is necessary to accommodate the approved building works shall be undertaken by an experienced an AQF level 3 Arborist under the supervision of the Project Arborist and in accordance with the reduction pruning clause of AS4373-2007. All other branches are to be tied back and protected during construction, under the supervision of a qualified arborist.
Reason: To protect the environment.
46. Treatment of tree roots
If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
47. Cutting of tree roots
No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following, tree(s) shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
48. Excavation near trees
No mechanical excavation shall be undertaken within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) until root pruning by hand along the perimeter line of such works is completed:
Reason: To protect existing trees.
49. Hand excavation
All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug under the supervision of the Project Arborist.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
50. No storage of materials beneath trees
No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.
Reason: To protect existing trees.
51. Tree planting on nature strip
The following tree species shall be planted, at no cost to Council, in the nature strip fronting the property along (enter street). The tree(s) used shall be a minimum 25 litres container size specimen(s):
Reason: To provide appropriate landscaping within the streetscape.
52. Removal of refuse
All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.
Reason: To protect the environment.
53. Canopy replenishment trees to be planted
The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order. Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.
Reason: To maintain the treed character of the area.
54. Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:
· ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry, · certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and · certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. · This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab. · No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.
At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area. This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
Reason: To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.
55. On site retention of waste dockets
All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.
· Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing. · This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.
Reason: To protect the environment.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:
56. Easement for waste collection
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B or 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property. The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.
Reason: To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.
57. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 343505M_07 have been complied with.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
58. Completion of landscape works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.
59. Completion of tree works
Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007 or remediation works in accordance with AS4370-2009, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.
Reason: To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.
60. Retention and re-use positive covenant
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
61. Provision of copy of OSD designs if Council is not the PCA
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the following must be provided to Council’s Development Engineer:
· A copy of the approved Construction Certificate stormwater detention/retention design for the site · A copy of any works-as-executed drawings required by this consent · The Engineer’s certification of the as-built system.
Reason: For Council to maintain its database of as-constructed on-site stormwater detention systems.
62. Certification of drainage works (dual occupancies and above)
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans · the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 respectively, have been achieved · retained water is connected and available for use · basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Appendix 7.1.1 of Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47 · all grates potentially accessible by children are secured · components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia · all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices
The rainwater certification sheet contained in Appendix 13 of the Ku-ring-gai Water Management Development Control Plan No. 47, must be completed and attached to the certification. Where an on-site detention system has been constructed, the on-site detention certification sheet contained in Appendix 4 of DCP 47 must also be completed and attached to the certification.
Note: Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
63. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:
· as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits · gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions · as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system · as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site · the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations · as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions · the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system · dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates · the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control · top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system
The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.
Reason: To protect the environment.
64. Basement pump-out maintenance
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.
Note: A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
Reason: To protect the environment.
65. OSD positive covenant/restriction
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.
The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to appendices of Ku-ring-gai Council Water Management DCP 47). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.
Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To protect the environment.
66. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority
Reason: Statutory requirement.
67. Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark – RFB
Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:
· the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans · the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking" in terms of minimum parking space dimensions · finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars · no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area · the vehicular headroom requirements of: - Australian Standard 2890.1 – “Off-street car parking”, - 2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks (refer DCP 40) are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.
Note: Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.
68. Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, and upon the completion of all works which may cause damage to Council's infrastructure, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:
· new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council · removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials) · full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction · full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing
This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.
All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.
Reason: To protect the streetscape.
69. Construction of works in public road – approved plans
Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.
The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council.
The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings. The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval. All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued.
Reason: To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.
Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision certificate:
70. Submission of 88b instrument
Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the applicant must submit an original instrument under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act with the plan of subdivision, plus six (6) copies to Council. Ku-ring-gai Council must be named as the authority whose consent is required to release, vary or modify the burdens.
Reason: To create all required easements, rights-of-carriageway, positive covenants, restrictions-on-use or other burdens/benefits as may be required.
71. Submission of certification of as-constructed development (strata)
Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the applicant is to submit a survey report and surveyor’s certificate which confirms that
(a) The floors, external walls and ceilings depicted in the proposed strata plan for the building correspond to those of the building as constructed; (b) The floors, external walls and ceilings of the building as constructed correspond to those depicted in the building plans that accompanied the construction certificate for the building; and (c) Any facilities required by the development consent for the building (such as parking spaces, terraces and courtyards) have been provided in accordance with those requirements.
Reason: To ensure that the as-constructed development is consistent with the approval.
72. Submission of plans of subdivision (strata)
For issue of the subdivision certificate, the applicant shall submit an original plan of subdivision plus 6 copies suitable for endorsement by the consent authority. The following details must be submitted with the plan of subdivision and its copies, where Council is the consent authority:
a) The endorsement fee current a the time of lodgement b) The 88B instrument plus 6 copies c) All surveyors and/or consulting engineers’ certification(s) required under this subdivision consent. d) Proof of payment of S94 contributions.
All parking spaces and all areas of common property, including visitor car parking spaces and on-site detention facilities, which are to be common property, must be included on the final plans of strata subdivision. Where Council is the certifying authority, officers will check the consent conditions on the subdivision. Failure to submit the required information will delay endorsement of the linen plan and may require payment of re-checking fees.
Plans (and copies) of subdivision must not be folded. Council will not accept bonds in lieu of completing subdivision works. If the certifying authority is not Council, then a copy of all of the above must be provided to Council.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
Conditions to be satisfied at all times:
73. Car parking
At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building. These requirements are to be enforced through the following:
· restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919 · restriction on use under Section 68 of the Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act, 1986 to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces
Reason: To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces.
|
Brodee Gregory Senior Assessment Officer |
Richard Kinninmont Team Leader- Development Assessment - Central |
Corrie Swanepoel Manager Development Assessment Services |
Michael Miocic Director Development & Regulation |
A1View |
BASIX Certificate |
|
2012/003879 |
|
|
A2View |
Location sketch |
|
2012/021270 |
|
A3View |
Zoning extract |
|
2012/021272 |
|
A4View |
SEPP 1 objection - Street frontage |
|
2012/021288 |
|
A5View |
SEPP 1 objection - Number of storeys |
|
2012/021311 |
|
A6View |
Architecturals |
|
2012/021483 |
|
A7View |
Landscape Plans |
|
2012/021482 |
|
A8View |
Engineering Plans |
|
2012/021481 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.9 / 486 |
|
|
Item GB.9 |
S04553 |
|
14 December 2011 |
Environmental Levy Small Grants Scheme - Round Thirteen
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To seek Council’s endorsement to fund round thirteen (13) of the Community Small Grants Scheme funded by the Environmental Levy. |
|
|
background: |
The Community Small Grants Scheme is designed to assist the Ku-ring-gai community to deliver small community based environmental projects at a neighbourhood level. An independent small grants assessment panel has been established to undertake the review process. |
|
|
comments: |
Twenty six (26) applications were received under round thirteen (13) of the Scheme. Of these, the small grants assessment panel recommends funding thirteen (13) projects totalling $40,068. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council supports the recommendation of the small grants assessment panel to fund thirteen (13) projects under round thirteen of the Environmental Levy Small Grants Scheme. |
Purpose of Report
To seek Council’s endorsement to fund round thirteen (13) of the Community Small Grants Scheme funded by the Environmental Levy.
Background
The Community Small Grants Scheme is designed to assist the Ku-ring-gai community to deliver small community based environmental projects at a neighbourhood level. The Scheme was identified in the development of the Environmental Levy, with strong support from residents and Councillors, as an opportunity to invest at the local level into projects of direct community benefit.
As part of the Scheme an independent panel was established to provide community and peer review of grant applications and funding protocols. This panel makes recommendations to Council for the funding of projects, the subject of this report. Membership of this panel was sought from the Open Space Reference Committee.
Table 1 outlines the number of projects and funding allocations through the Community Small Grants Scheme to date.
Table 1: Summary of grants funded through the Community Small Grants Scheme to date
|
Number of successful applications |
Funding allocation |
Round 1 |
3 |
$12,350 |
Round 2 |
12 |
$52,349 |
9 |
$38,982 |
|
Round 4 |
9 |
$41,000 |
Round 5 |
10 |
$39,926 |
Round 6 |
11 |
$39,720 |
Round 7 |
10 |
$42,402 |
Round 8 |
11 |
$40,636 |
Round 9 |
12 |
$40,069 |
Round 10 |
7 |
$40,343 |
Round 11 |
11 |
$46,174 |
Round 12 |
12 |
$45,276 |
TOTAL |
|
$479,227 |
A summary of the current status of community small grant projects can be viewed on the Council web page http://www.kmc.nsw.gov.au/www/html/485-small-grants-scheme.asp?intSiteID=1
Comments
Round thirteen (13) was promoted through advertisements in local newspapers, the Mayor’s column, and advertisements in three (3) Chinese newspapers. Posters and flyers were displayed in Council libraries and Council Chambers.
Additionally, electronic promotion was conducted through Council’s website, E-news, Kasey and Council’s environmental e-mail distribution lists.
A total of twenty six (26) funding requests were received totalling $121,324.45. The budget for round thirteen (13) is $40,068. Applications were reviewed and rated by each member of the small grants assessment panel. Please see Attachment A1 for a summary of the assessment panel review.
Based on this review, a summary of the recommended projects (for funding) is provided in Table 2.
Table 2: Summary of successful projects and applicants
Project name |
Group |
Recommended funding |
Blue Gum High Forest Restoration
|
Laura Osborne Houison Sanctuary Bushcare |
$1,500 |
Establishment of permaculture vegetable gardens to enhance and expand existing environmental education programs |
Killara Public School
|
$1,577 |
Provision of access from cliff line to fire trail adjacent to Gordon Creek and clearance of selected woody weeds |
Robinson Street Bushcare group |
$1,760 |
Aviaries for wildlife rehabilitation and release
|
Sydney Metropolitan Wildlife Services |
$3,762 |
Weed awareness display |
Ku-ring-gai Bushcare Association |
$5,000 |
Middle Harbour saltmarsh protection: follow up and maintenance |
Barrie St Bushcare |
$5,000 |
Signage at STEP track
|
STEP Inc. |
$3,500 |
On-going bush regeneration and fauna survey /recommendations
|
Mashmans Quarry Reserve Streetcare |
$5,000 |
Increasing and improving fauna habitat through the provision of nest boxes
|
Amarna Parade Bushcare
|
$1,089 |
Rock stabilisation of stormwater outlet and removal of large privet
|
Dunoon Ave Bushcare
|
$2,530 |
Riparian bush regeneration along Quarry Creek, West Pymble
|
Friends of Lane Cove NP
|
$5,000 |
Wildlife Veterinary Clinic -provision of veterinary services, drugs and equipment
|
Wildlife Assistance and Information Foundation Inc. |
$4,000 |
Provision of native bee hive
|
Killara High School
|
$350 |
Total |
|
$40,068 |
Governance Matters
The Community Small Grants Scheme, delivered through the Environmental Levy program, provides annual funding to support environmental projects at a community level. Community development programs are highlighted in Ku-ring-gai’s Community Strategic Plan as a key area for Council and accordingly the Environmental Levy funds a range of initiatives in this regard.
Risk Management
Supporting the community through the Small Grants Scheme improves the reputation of Council. The Scheme covers a range of projects and within each project there are a variety of associated risks. Council ensures reduced risk to the community and the environment by working closely with grant recipients, to ensure that work undertaken in bushland is expertly handled by professionals and that contractors are sourced with appropriate training and work safety standards.
Financial Considerations
The Environmental Levy has allocated $40,068 for this round of the Community Small Grants Scheme.
Social Considerations
The Community Small Grants Scheme provides an opportunity to invest at the local level into projects of direct community benefit. Many of the Scheme’s projects see community members working closely together around a project with an environmental focus. Thus, the Scheme has positive social benefits as well as environmental.
Environmental Considerations
A key theme which emerged from round thirteen (13) of the Scheme was fauna. Outstanding applications were received from a number of organisations which will ensure improved outcomes for wildlife in the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area.
The Small Grants Scheme criteria ensures that all projects are to benefit the natural environment:
· contribution to a sustainable community with an environmental benefit for a significant section of the community;
· cost effectiveness;
· a plan of management, demonstrating sound management practices including planning to achieve the proposed objectives;
· planning towards incorporating financial, social and environmental sustainability; and
· compliance with relevant legislation including, but not limited to the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act, 1977.
Community Consultation
The small grants assessment panel was partly selected from the Open Space Reference Committee. The panel for round thirteen (13) comprised of two (2) volunteers from the Committee, the President of the WildThings Association and (2) Council staff from the Environment and Sustainability section of Council. The panel corresponded via e-mail and telephone to review the proposals.
Internal Consultation
In reviewing the grant applications, the Community Volunteer Co-ordinator liaised with the Manager of Environment and Sustainability, the Team Leader Environmental Levy and Bushcare staff, in relation to projects that fell within their areas of professional expertise.
Summary
This report seeks Council’s support to fund round thirteen (13) of the Community Small Grants Scheme funded by the Environmental Levy.
Twenty six (26) applications were received under round thirteen (13) of the Scheme. Of these, the small grants assessment panel recommends funding thirteen (13) projects totalling $40,068.
That Council supports the recommendation of the small
grants assessment panel to fund |
Peter Clarke Community Volunteers Co-ordinator |
Marnie Kikken Manager Environment & Sustainability |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
A1View |
Round 13 Environmental Levy Small Grants - Assessors comments |
|
2012/014521 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.10 / 493 |
|
|
Item GB.10 |
S07620 |
|
6 December 2011 |
Heritage Reference Committee - Notes of Meeting Held 21 November 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To have Council consider the notes of the Heritage
Reference Committee (HRC) meetings held on |
|
|
background: |
The notes were taken at the meetings held 21 November 2011. Confirmation and acceptance of these notes were at the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) meetings held on 5 December 2011. |
|
|
comments: |
A range of issues were discussed at the Heritage Reference Committee’s meeting of 21 November 2011 and a number of issues were raised for further consideration. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council receive and note the Heritage Reference
Committee meeting notes and attachments from |
Purpose of Report
To have Council consider the notes of the Heritage Reference
Committee (HRC) meetings held on
21 November 2011.
Background
The notes taken at the 21 November 2011 meeting were confirmed and accepted at the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) meeting held on 5 December, 2011.
Comments
A range of heritage issues were discussed at the Committee meetings of 21 November 2011 (Attachment A1) and a number of issues were raised for further consideration as outlined below:
Heritage Reference Committee Meeting Notes of Meeting of 21 November 2010
Item 4: Heritage and LEP update
The Committee discussed the Council resolution to prepare an Interim Biodiversity and Heritage LEP as a result of a Notice of Motion at the Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 8 November 2011. The interim LEP is an amendment to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance and will protect those proposed heritage conservation areas adopted by Council until the Town Centres and Principal LEPs are exhibited and gazetted.
Item 6: Post-war Review – additional potential heritage item
The Heritage Reference Committee discussed Council pursuing an Interim Heritage Order for the “Wilson House” 7 McRae Place, North Turramurra. Perumal Murphy Alessi Heritage Consultants completed a review of the property in October 2011 – a copy of the inventory sheet was circulated to the Committee. The architect, Colin Madigan, designed this house in 1969 for the Wilson family. In an interview with the NSW Heritage Office in 2010 Madigan described the Wilson house as one of two intact "signature houses" that carried his "design ethos." The Wilson House is representative of the Sydney School of architecture. Colin Madigan passed away in September 2011. It is understood the house and its landscape setting are under threat of unsympathetic development and or potential demolition hence the need for an Interim Heritage Order.
Recommendation
That Council should pursue all actions necessary to obtain an Interim Heritage Order from the Minister for Heritage for 7 McRae Place Turramurra to allow for the proper consideration of the potential item, to allow a thorough comparative analysis and seek comment and further information from the community and other groups. This significant building designed by such a prominent Australian architect deserves thorough investigation of its potential state significance, and protection by an Interim Heritage Order.
It should be noted on 22 November 2011 Council resolved ;
A. That Council request the NSW Minister for Heritage to place
an Interim Heritage Order on
7 McRae Place, North Turramurra (Lot 17 DP.30833) to enable further assessment
and consideration of its local heritage significance and potential state
heritage significance.
B. That Council include 7 McRae Place, North Turramurra (Lot 17 DP.30833) as draft item of heritage significance in the Ku-ring-gai Principal Local Environmental Plan.
Governance Matters
Consisting of eight members, the Heritage Reference Committee includes Councillors, community members and heritage practitioners. The Heritage Reference Committees provide a mechanism by which interested residents and experts can play an active role in the formulation of Council’s Heritage policy, direction and practice.
The facilitation of the Heritage Reference Committee is covered by the Planning and Development Principal Activity - 4 year objective “ to actively engage and develop partnerships across Council and the boarder community including local and regional departments and the 1 year objective “to facilitate and service Council’s Heritage Reference Committee’.
The Committee provides advice on heritage matters and assists with the promotion, understanding and appreciation of heritage. While not a decision-making body, the Committee nevertheless plays an important function in shaping Ku-ring-gai's future.
This Committee is also an important link in Council's communication strategy with the community and is supported via other community consultative methods.
Risk Management
In providing advice and recommendations to Council on the management of strategic heritage issues in Ku-ring-gai, this Committee assists in the future management of Ku-ring-gai’s cultural heritage.
Financial Considerations
The costs of running the Heritage Reference Committee are covered by the Strategy and Environment Department budget.
Social Considerations
The aims of the Heritage Reference Committee are to provide advice to Council on heritage matters and provide assistance to Council in promoting an understanding and appreciation of heritage through specific activities and events. Consisting of eight members, the Heritage Reference Committee includes Councillors, community members and heritage practitioners the committee provides a broad and representative input into the management of Council’s heritage.
Environmental Considerations
A role of the Heritage Reference Committee is to support the management of Ku-ring-gai’s cultural heritage. Advice to Council by the HRC will further assist in the identification and management of Ku-ring-gai’s Cultural Heritage.
Community Consultation
The Heritage Reference Committee (comprising of Councillors, community and heritage practitioners) meets on a monthly basis and notification of meetings is provided in the local press, the agenda and Heritage Reference Committee notes are provided on Council’s website.
Internal Consultation
Heritage Reference Committee has as its member’s Councillors, community and heritage practitioners and is facilitated by Council staff. Where relevant, consultation with other Departments has occurred in the preparation of the report.
Summary
The Heritage Reference Committee held its meetings on 21 November 2011. In particular the Committee reviewed and discussed the following key items:
· Heritage and LEP update.
· Post-war Review – additional potential heritage item.
That Council receive and note the Heritage Reference Committee meeting notes and attachments of 21 November 2011.
|
Andreana Kennedy Strategy - Heritage Planner Specialist |
Antony Fabbro Manager Urban & Heritage Planning |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
A1View |
Draft notes - Heritage Reference Committee - 21 November 2011 |
|
2011/266895 |
APPENDIX No: 1 - Draft notes - Heritage Reference Committee - 21 November 2011 |
|
Item No: GB.10 |
Heritage Reference Committee
Draft Notes of 21 November 2011
Council Chambers
Meeting Commenced 6. 30pm
Attendance:
Councillor Jennifer Anderson (Chair)
Councillor Cheryl Szatow
Robert Moore - National Trust (NSW)
Margaret Bergomi – Australian Institute of Architects
Joanne Martens
Zeny Edwards
Staff Members:
Manager Urban & Heritage Planning – Antony Fabbro
Heritage Specialist Planner – Andreana Kennedy
Heritage Advisor – Paul Dignam
Student Heritage Officer – Lara Goldstein
Apologies:
Jennifer Harvey – Ku-ring-gai Historical Society
Declarations of Interest
None.
Adoption of notes from the previous meeting
The notes from 19 September 2011 Heritage Reference Committee meeting were accepted by the Committee as being correct.
Item 1: Heritage Reference Committee – Risk Assessment Program
Council’s Manager Finance - Tino Caltabiano and Council’s Risk Management Co-ordinator - Tim Johnstone gave a presentation to the Committee on Council’s Risk Management Program. Council is required to manage risk consistent with the ISO 31000 Risk Management Standard. Council achieves this through risk identification, analysis, evaluation and treatment. The Committee members were asked to consider what risks affect the Committee. Another meeting is planned in the near future to document, assess and address these risks.
Item 2: 8 Gladstone Avenue, Warrawee
Council’s Manager Urban & Heritage Planning - Antony Fabbro addressed the Committee with regards to the owner of 8 Gladstone Avenue, Warrawee who approached Council to request removal of her house from the heritage schedule. The owner expressed two issues with inclusion on the heritage schedule – incorrect identification as the photograph on the heritage inventory sheet shows 6 Gladstone Avenue (now demolished), and secondly that dramatic structural change had already occurred prior to the heritage listing and to the current owner’s purchase of the property. The Committee discussed options for the investigation of the property’s cultural significance. The Committee agreed this work should be done independently as part of the strategic planning work for the Principle LEP.
Item 3: Amendments to the heritage schedule (individual items)
Council’s Specialist Heritage Planner - Andreana Kennedy asked the Committee if they knew of any irregularities in Council’s heritage schedules or properties that had been demolished, erroneously listed or omitted. The heritage schedule is being reviewed for the Town Centres and Principal LEPs.
Item 4: Heritage and LEP update
The Committee discussed the Council resolution to prepare an Interim Biodiversity and Heritage LEP as a result of a Notice of Motion at the Council’s Ordinary Meeting of 8 November 2011. The interim LEP is an amendment to the Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance and will protect those proposed heritage conservation areas adopted by Council until the Town Centres and Principal LEPs are exhibited and gazetted.
Item 5: Heritage Week 2012
The Committee discussed ideas for Heritage Week 2012. Zeny Edwards suggested a register of significant trees. The Committee also discussed the possibility of an electronic nomination form on the Council website for the community to nominate potential heritage items. Council’s Heritage Advisor- Paul Dignam agreed – Council does have a simple form and it would be possible to put it on the Council website which can be announced during Heritage Week 2012.
Item 6: Post-war Review – additional potential heritage item
A copy of the heritage inventory sheet for the “Wilson House” 7 McRae Place, North Turramurra (Perumal Murphy Alessi Heritage Consultants - October 2011) was circulated. The architect, Colin Madigan, designed this house in 1969 for the Wilson family. A renowned Australian architect, Colin Madigan; is most famous for his design work on the National Gallery of Australia and the High Court of Australia. While mainly known for his civic buildings, Colin Madigan also designed domestic houses in his career. In an interview with the NSW Heritage Office in 2010 Madigan described the Wilson house as one of two intact "signature houses" that carried his "design ethos." The Wilson House is representative of the Sydney School of architecture. The philosophic base of this style of architecture is heavily influenced by nature, organic forms, sight features, context and local architectural influences. The design of the Wilson House typifies the organic approach to design with its visual nexus between the interiors and the native garden, and the use of substantive eucalyptus planting. Colin Madigan passed away in September 2011. It is understood the house and its landscape setting are under threat of unsympathetic development and or potential demolition hence the need for an Interim Heritage Order.
Recommendation:
That Council should pursue all actions necessary to obtain an Interim Heritage Order from the Minister for Heritage for 7 McRae Place Turramurra to allow for the proper consideration of the potential item, to allow a thorough comparative analysis and seek comment and further information from the community and other groups. This significant building designed by such a prominent Australian architect deserves thorough investigation of its potential state significance, and protection from an Interim Heritage Order.
Meeting Closed: 8.20pm
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.11 / 500 |
|
|
Item GB.11 |
S03938 |
|
6 January 2012 |
Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To consider a formal commitment to the Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan (SHCWQIP) project, coordinated by the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority (SMCMA). |
|
|
background: |
There is currently no coordinated, catchment-wide plan with sufficient technical detail to guide the improvement of water quality from catchments draining to Sydney Harbour. The SMCMA is seeking to address this through the development of a SHCWQIP. |
|
|
comments: |
The models, tools and data from the development of the SHCWQIP will be extremely valuable for Ku-ring-gai’s catchment management programs and will complement the actions of Council’s Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council formally commits to the Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan (SHCWQIP) and provides funding of $10,000 per year to the project over the next three years (FY2011/2012 to FY2013/2014). This financial contribution has been accounted for from the ‘water quality and quantity and river health analysis’ project budget (which is funded through a combination of Environmental Levy and general funds). |
Purpose of Report
To consider a formal commitment to the Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan (SHCWQIP) project, coordinated by the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority (SMCMA).
Background
There is currently no coordinated, catchment-wide plan with sufficient technical detail to guide the improvement of water quality from catchments draining to Sydney Harbour. Consequently, the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority (SMCMA) has proposed the development of the Sydney Harbour Catchment Water Quality Improvement Plan (SHCWQIP) to address the ongoing ecological health of Sydney Harbour and its catchments. The SHCWQIP will provide a coordinated management framework for the 25 local councils, 11 State government agencies and 2 Commonwealth government agencies that have a stake in improving the health of these waterways.
The development of the SHCWQIP will require a number of studies and will require partnership support from the local councils and government agencies which manage land within the Sydney Harbour Catchment, including Ku-ring-gai Council. The key studies and tasks to develop the SHCWQIP are outlined in the project business case (Attachment A1).
Comments
The final SHCWQIP, as well as the models, tools and data used to construct the Plan, will assist Council in meeting its Delivery Program 2012-15 objective To implement the Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy (WAT4.2). In particular, this project will provide information that will help Council to meet the following objectives from its Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy:
- Ensure water sensitive urban design elements are incorporated within public infrastructure and private property;
- Develop and implement programs that ensure infrastructure is properly designed and maintained; and
- Continue to build knowledge on Ku-ring-gai’s water cycle.
The proposed outputs from the development of the SHCWQIP will be extremely valuable for catchment management planning in Ku-ring-gai. The models, tools and data produced can be used to inform and contribute to a number of existing studies including:
- Local Catchment Plans;
- Sustainable Water Management Studies;
- Flood studies; and
- Aquatic Macroinvertebrate (waterway health) Studies
As outlined by the SMCMA, project outcomes and benefits for Councils and staff include:
- Access to a single hydrologic model for water quality, flooding and climate change predictions, which extends across the whole of the Sydney Harbour Catchment;
- Access to the Pollutant Export Model to provide estimates of total annual pollutant loads of sediments and nutrients;
- Access to an Ecological Response Model to describe the overall impact on receiving waters and assist Council to influence and improve water quality;
- Access to a Water Quality Decision Support System to describe sub-catchment and Council based pollutant loads, climate change and land use change impacts, catchment management impacts and the potential changes to receiving waters;
- Information to assist grant submissions for water quality improvement works or as part of s94 plans or similar contributory plans;
- A means to verify actions identified in Stormwater Management Plans;
- The WQIP will be a valuable reference in planning policies, budget proposals and external funding applications; and
- Economies of scale offered through coordinated activities - the SMCMA will provide coordination and facilitation services.
Governance Matters
The SHCWQIP will be managed by the SMCMA with funding and in-kind contributions from local councils and State and Commonwealth government agencies.
The proposed governance structure and each partner’s obligations are set out in a Memorandum of Understanding between the SMCMA and Councils within the catchment of Sydney Harbour (Attachment A1). In summary, Council’s obligations are to:
- Provide financial support (see Financial Considerations);
- Nominate an officer as point of contact for the project;
- Appoint a nominated representative to attend the SHCWQIP Partnership Committee meetings;
- Allocate technical staff and supporting resources to provide project advice and guidance;
- Provide resources and material which is considered to be relevant to the SHCWQIP; and
- Nominate council staff to undertake training in the Decision Support System.
Risk Management
The SMCMA has undertaken a project risk assessment which is outlined in the business plan (Attachment A1). This assessment shows that although there are some risks associated with funding security and project costs, these can be adequately mitigated through appropriate control measures, such as ensuring delivery of early project components on time and budget, seeking additional funding sources, using fixed price contracts and reducing the project scope and complexity.
The SHCWQIP project draws upon the experience of the SMCMA in delivering many of the technical and modelling aspects of the successful Botany Bay WQIP, demonstrated to be a low risk and high value investment.
Financial Considerations
Potential funding arrangements for the development of the SCHWQIP have been assessed. The preferred option is to seek a mix of funding from the SMCMA, local councils and State and Commonwealth Government agencies.
The SMCMA is contributing $75,000 per year to the SCHWQIP for four years (2010-11 to 2013-14). The proposed funding from councils is based on population size/ catchment size and ranges from $7,500 to $15,000 per year for three years. The SMCMA is seeking $10,000 per year for three years from Ku-ring-gai Council. The proposed annual contribution from each Council is set out in the project business plan (Attachment A1).
In addition to the SMCMA funding, the following funds are already secured toward the SHCWQIP:
- Office of Environment and Heritage $100,000
- Parramatta City Council $20,000
- Parramatta R. Estuary Management Committee $20,000
- City of Sydney $15,000
- City of Ryde $15,000
- Holroyd City Council $10,000
- Blacktown City Council $7,500
- Burwood Council $7,500; and
- Strathfield Council $7,500
It is important to note that the models, tools and data developed through the SCHWQIP project could not be developed cost effectively on an individual Council basis. The SMCMA has been discussing this project with Council over the last 12 months and as such a contribution for this project has been accounted for over the next three years from the ‘water quality and quantity and river health analysis’ project budget (which is funded through a combination of Environmental Levy and general funds) within projected funding forecast in Council’s Long Term Financial Plan.
Social Considerations
Although there will be no direct, immediate impacts on society as a result of this project, a variety of considerations may arise that will need to be addressed. These could include the need to campaign for more water quality friendly individual behaviours or updating development controls to address identified issues. These will be more closely considered as the SHCWQIP deliverables are made available.
Council’s involvement in this project will demonstrate its commitment and leadership in improving the ecological integrity of its waterways and its acknowledgement of the community values placed upon the Sydney Harbour and its surrounding catchment.
Environmental Considerations
This project has been developed to implement a catchment wide approach to water quality improvement. This will help guide Ku-ring-gai’s catchment management program and complement the actions of Council’s Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy.
Community Consultation
The Open Space Reference Committee will be notified of the project and any updates as the project progresses. Where any of the project outcomes directly relate to local community members or groups they will also be notified as appropriate.
Internal Consultation
The outcomes from the project are likely to benefit a number of different departments throughout Council, particularly the Strategy & Environment and Operations departments. As the project progresses relevant council officers will be invited to participate in capacity building training, such as model application training.
Summary
There is currently no coordinated, catchment-wide plan with sufficient technical detail to guide the improvement of water quality from catchments draining to Sydney Harbour. The SMCMA is seeking to address this through the development of a SHCWQIP.
The models, tools and data from the development of the SHCWQIP will be extremely valuable for Ku-ring-gai’s catchment management programs and will complement the actions of Council’s Integrated Water Cycle Management Strategy and could not be developed cost effectively on an individual Council basis.
A. That Council signs the Memorandum of Understanding with the SMCMA and formally commits to the project over the next three years (FY2011/2012 to FY2013/2014).
B. That Council provides funding of $10,000 per year to the project over the next three years (FY2011/2012 to FY2013/2014).
C. That Council’s Technical Officer – Water & Catchments is nominated as Ku-ring-gai’s contact officer for the project.
D. That Council seeks clarification from the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority (SMCMA) as to the anticipated level of representation required for the proposed Partnership Committee.
|
Sophia Findlay Technical Officer Water & Catchments |
Marnie Kikken Manager Environment & Sustainability |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
|
A1View |
Sydney Metropolitan CMA Business Case and MoU |
|
2011/291644 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.12 / 525 |
|
|
Item GB.12 |
S04553 |
|
12 January 2012 |
New South Wales Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of the NSW Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme being administered by the Division of Local Government. |
|
|
background: |
On 6 January 2012, the Division of Local Government Circular 12-01 advised Councils of the release on new guidelines under the NSW Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme. |
|
|
comments: |
Preference will be given to projects/programs or groups of projects/programs with a total cost of at least $1 million. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council notify the Division of Local Government that it wishes to lodge an application under the Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme in an amount up to $2 million for the following projects:
· Gordon Library upgrade – approximately $1 million community project; · selected Building assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition – including public toilet blocks; and · car park assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition.
|
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of the NSW Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme being administered by the Division of Local Government.
Background
On 6 January 2012, the Division of Local Government Circular 12-01 advised Councils of the release on new guidelines under the NSW Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme.
The NSW Government’s has a goal to invest in critical infrastructure. To achieve this, the NSW Government has committed to implementing a Local Infrastructure Backlog Policy, which comprises the following elements:
1. Audit of local infrastructure backlog
The Division of Local Government (DLG) is undertaking an audit of each council’s local infrastructure backlog to provide better information on investment needs.
The infrastructure backlog audit is based on Council’s 10-year Asset Management Plans, prepared under the Integrated Planning and Reporting (IP&R) framework, and data included in Council’s annual financial reports. The audit is being undertaken in stages from 2011 to 2014 as councils commence under the IP&R Framework.
2. Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS)
The Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS) provides the opportunity for councils to access interest subsidies for the purpose of funding legitimate infrastructure backlogs.
The LIRS will provide a 4% interest subsidy to assist councils with legitimate infrastructure backlogs to cover the cost of borrowing. The subsidy aims to provide an incentive to councils to make greater use of debt funding to accelerate investment in infrastructure backlogs and augment funding options already available to councils.
3. NSW Treasury Corporation financial assessment and benchmarking
NSW Treasury Corporation (TCorp) is establishing a system for financial assessment and benchmarking of NSW councils financial positions. The purpose of the assessment is to assist councils implement their asset acquisition and investment management strategies, including providing advice on their capacity to utilise debt when appropriate.
The LIRS provides loan interest subsidies of 4% that will substantially reduce the borrowing costs on significant loans that councils take out specifically to pay for infrastructure projects such as roads, community halls, libraries, parks, sports facilities and water facilities.
Councils that apply for assistance under the LIRS will be required to have a TCorp assessment completed.
There are two (2) timeframes for Council’s to respond to:
10 February 2012 Pre-notification by Councils intending to lodge an application.
30 March 2012 Applications close.
COMMENTS
The DLG is requesting that interested Council’s review the guidelines prior to submitting an intention to lodge notice.
The guidelines (Attachment A1) provide detailed information on the eligibility requirements and the assessment criteria for projects to enable councils to consider these before deciding whether to apply for LIRS.
Preference will be given to projects/programs or groups of projects/programs with a total cost of at least $1 million. This amount may comprise of:
· a single project/program (e.g. a park, a library, a single road segment);
· a group of different but related projects (e.g. redevelopment of community facilities clustered in a single location); or
· a group of projects of a similar nature that can be packaged as a single program (e.g. small road projects in different sites within the local government area which require major periodic renewal).
The projects/programs for which a council proposes to incur borrowings to be subsidised under the LIRS should be identified as part of Council’s infrastructure backlog and favourable projects/programs should be identified in the council’s 10 year Asset Management Plans prepared under the Integrated Planning & Reporting framework.
Based on Council’s adopted asset management plans the following is a summary of the current condition of Councils assets:
· 0.8% of drainage pits and pipes are in a failed condition, this is a total of 115 assets;
· 28.2% of roads are in failed condition; this is a total of 874 roads;
· 0.5% of assets within recreational facilities are in a failed condition, this is a total of 100 assets;
· 5.9% of footpaths are in a failed condition, this is a total of 25 footpaths;
· 8.9% of kerb and gutter is in a failed condition, this is a total of 187 assets;
· 6.1% of buildings are in a failed condition, this is a total of 16 structures;
· 4.55% of car park pavement is in a failed condition, this is a total of 3 car parks;
· 1.6% of car park structures are in a failed condition, this is a total of 26 assets; and
· 2 bridges have been identified in a poor condition.
Further:
· there is no capital funding for kerb & gutter, bridges, street furniture and road structures and car parks;
· there is not sufficient capital funding for buildings, footpaths and drainage; and
· the only asset groups that have sufficient funding to bring the asset to a satisfactory standard are roads, recreational facilities and fleet.
Given that roads and recreational facilities have allocated funding, and fleet does not meet the LIRS criteria it is proposed the following backlog projects/programs be considered for the application.
· Gordon Library upgrade – community project;
· selected building assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition, including public toilet blocks; and
· car park assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition;
Governance Matters
Since 2009, Council has adopted a suite of asset management documents in response to the legislative requirements of the Integrated Planning & Reporting reforms. This is inline with the requirements of the integrated planning reforms and the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting.
LIRS applications must refer to strategic planning or development approval documents, documents prepared for the Integrated Planning & Reporting framework, profiles and projections of economic activities in the area and how the project/program will deliver services consistent with Council’s plans.
Council must submit its relevant Asset Management Plan and its Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) with the proposed project/program resourcing commitments clearly identified as evidence of the affordability of the loan.
Asset management planning and asset condition assessments should be completed consistent with the requirements set out in section 3.4 of the Planning and Reporting Manual for Local Government in NSW 2010
Risk Management
Council is required to submit its pre-notification intent by 10 February 2012.
However, the DLG is recommending that all project preparation work i.e. pre-feasibility work, feasibility studies, business case, procurement strategy and pre-tender assessment should be well progressed at close of the LIRS application on 30 March 2012. Along with initial bank discussions regarding indicative loan amount, term, etc.
Councils must also explain within their application where the project/program ranks in relation to other infrastructure backlog priorities and provide evidence demonstrating that the proposed backlog infrastructure project/program will directly meet service needs in the local government area.
Support will only be provided to subsidise borrowings for projects/programs that are in a reasonably advanced stage of preparation. Applicants will be required to supply evidence:
· that appropriate project/program preparation (e.g. project/program cost-benefit analysis, project/program scoping, options studies, design and other relevant work) has been or is being undertaken;
· that the LIRS subsidy will help to accelerate the delivery of the infrastructure project/program;
· of Council’s procurement strategy for the project/program;
· detailed business case documentation prepared for the project/program; and
· that Council has considered other relevant factors affecting project/program preparedness, and is doing the necessary work to address these.
Financial Considerations
As stated earlier in this report, preference will be given to projects/programs or groups of projects/programs with a total cost of at least $1 million.
All loans subsidised by the LIRS must have a loan term not exceeding ten years (irrespective of starting date of the loan agreement), and will be subject to specific conditions of LIRS support (refer section 6 of LIRS Guidelines).
Council must demonstrate how the LIRS subsidy will accelerate the provision of infrastructure in the area and support the Council’s Resourcing Strategy (LTFP, Asset Management Improvement Strategy and Workforce Plan) under the IP&R framework (where completed) and must show evidence that insufficient ‘internal’ funds are available for the infrastructure project/program.
The benefit of the scheme is its ability to fund slightly more Capex as the loan subsidy of 4% is available. On a $1 million, 10 year loan at 7%, the gain to Council equates to approximately $200,000 or 20%.
It is proposed that an application of $2 million is allocated towards the following projects:
· Gordon Library upgrade – approximately $1 million community project;
· selected building assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition – including public toilet blocks; and
· car park assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition;
The building assets are proposed to include the old heritage buildings at the St Ives Showground and the car park assets would include an upgrade to the road and parking areas at the St Ives Showground. An inspection with the Mayor and Ward Councillors was held on 23 January 2012 and the buildings were in a poor condition and require upgrading. The estimated cost to repair the buildings, roadway and parking areas is estimated to be around $200,000.
Council’s LTFP must provide evidence that the proposed infrastructure investment is affordable and sustainable and appropriate funding will need to be allocated in the LTFP and the Operational Plan 2012/2013 and Delivery Program 2013 – 2016.
It is important for Council to note that should it be successful in acquiring a site for relocation of Civic Administration functions through interim loans, then Council’s debt service ratio will be unacceptably high during the next four (4) years and at risk until various property sales are realised including the land subdivision on the B2 corridor.
Social Considerations
Council adopted Community Strategic Plan 2030, vision for Ku-ring-gai is in place with infrastructure and facilities that accommodate the needs of the community and that Council is financially sustainable.
The provision of resources required to implement the strategies established by the community strategic plan are supported by a resourcing strategy which is to include long-term financial planning, workforce management planning and asset management planning.
Environmental Considerations
The environmental implications of specific projects will be subject to review if required.
Community Consultation
Community consultation will be carried out in relation to specific projects as they are implemented and where required by Council policy.
The projects nominated in this report are all consistent with broader community satisfaction surveys Council has conducted in recent years.
Internal Consultation
Councillors have been briefed on legislative changes and Integrated Planning and Reporting requirements for all NSW Councils at a workshop held on 24 November 2011.
Consultation has taken place between Strategy and Environment, Operations, Community and Corporate Departments in the preparation of this report.
Summary
The Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS) provides the opportunity for Council to access 4% loan interest subsidy to fund legitimate infrastructure backlogs.
Councils intending to submit an application under this round must notify the DLG by 10 February 2012, with a comprehensive application made by 30 March 2012.
It is the intention of the NSW Government to provide funding for subsequent rounds for the years 2012/13 to 2014/15.
Based on Council’s adopted asset management plans, condition of Councils assets and that insufficient ‘internal’ funds are available it is consider that the following projects meet the criteria expressed in the NSW LIRS Guidelines:
· Gordon Library upgrade – approximately $1 million community project;
· selected Building assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition – including public toilet blocks; and
· car park assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition.
The building assets are proposed to include the old heritage buildings at the St Ives Showground and the car park assets would include an upgrade to the road and parking areas at the St Ives Showground. An inspection with the Mayor and Ward Councillors was held on 23 January 2012 and the buildings were in a poor condition and require upgrading. The estimated cost to repair the buildings, roadway and parking areas is estimated to be around $200,000.
Council’s LTFP must provide evidence that the proposed infrastructure investment is affordable and sustainable and appropriate funding will need to be allocated in the LTFP and the Operational Plan 2012/2013 and Delivery Program 2013 – 2016.
A. That Council notify the Division of Local Government that it wishes to lodge an application under the Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme in an amount up to $2 million for the following projects:
· Gordon Library upgrade – approximately $1 million community project; · selected Building assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition – including public toilet blocks; and · car park assets identified in Council’s asset management plans in failed condition.
B. That appropriate funding be allocated in the LTFP and the Operational Plan 2012/2013 and Delivery Program 2013 – 2016 for an amount up to $2 million to fund projects to be carried out under the Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme. |
Deborah Silva Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets |
Tino Caltabiano Acting Director Corporate |
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
Andrew Watson Director Strategy & Environment |
A1View |
NSW Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme Guidelines |
|
2012/010903 |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.13 / 555 |
|
|
Item GB.13 |
S09043 |
|
3 January 2012 |
Expressions of Interest EOI 11/2011 - Design and Construction of Emergency Services Facilities
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To advise Council of the Expressions of Interest 11/2011, received for the design and construction of Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Wahroonga and to seek approval to call selective tenders from the recommended short listed companies. |
|
|
background: |
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council of 10 November 2009, Council resolved in part that:”..Council's designers be requested to prepare detailed designs for the construction of the new headquarters.” During 2010, architectural designs and documentation were prepared in consultation with the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade. In December 2011, a Development Application was approved by Council and a public tender was required to seek contractors for the subsequent design and construction. |
|
|
comments: |
The first stage of tendering for the construction of
the |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council approve the calling of select tenders from those companies nominated in this report for the design and construction of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Wahroonga. |
Purpose of Report
To advise Council of the Expressions of Interest 11/2011, received for the design and construction of Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Wahroonga and to seek approval to call selective tenders from the recommended short listed companies.
Background
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council of 10 November 2009, Council resolved in part:
” ..Council's designers be requested to prepare detailed designs for the construction
of the new headquarters.” Located at Golden Jubilee field, Wahroonga.
During 2010, architectural designs and documentation were prepared in consultation with the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services (SES) and Bush Fire Brigade (BFB) to finalise internal layouts.
In accordance with Council’s Procurement Policy, a public tender is required to engage contractors for the subsequent design and construction. Following is the culmination of events during 2011:
§ In order to rectify zoning and land reservation issues, at the Ordinary Meeting of Council 1 February 2011, Council resolved to submit the planning proposal (to amend the KPSO to make the Emergency Services facilities as permissible development in the Open space 6(a) Recreation Existing Zone) to the NSW Department of Planning, and to seek approval from the Crown Lands Division of the Land and Property Management Authority to amend the reservation boundaries to permit construction. Both were gazetted in 2011.
§ Under Council’s internal procedure for the Development Application (DA), an independent Town Planner was required to be appointed and they were engaged in April 2011 for the preparation of a DA for the project. Lodgement was made on 21 September 2011 and was approved by Council at its meeting of 13 December 2011.
The first stage of a select tender is to hold a formal Expression of Interest (EOI) process. An EOI was called from 18 November 2011 and closed on 13 December 2011.
A full evaluation was carried out by a Tender Evaluation Committee (TEC). The report forms Confidential Attachment A1 to this report.
A total of seven (7) companies are short listed.
Short list |
|
§ Brisland Pty Ltd § Kane Construction (NSW) Pty Ltd § Denham Constructions Pty Ltd § Gartner Rose § Taylor Construction Group |
§ Time Cost and Quality Pty Ltd § Contract Control Services Pty Ltd |
Comments
A Development Application No. DA0513/11 was approved at Council’s Ordinary Meeting of Council on 13 December 2011. In order to accelerate the construction process, it was decided to tender the work under a design and construct style tender. As part of the design and construction tender process, a Construction Certificate is required to be obtained by the successful tenderer. The DA conditions will be included in the tender documentation which allows respondents to tender with much greater certainty both about the conditions, timeframe of the project as well as the comprehensive definition of the scope of the project.
A Design and Construct Contract was considered the preferred method for the implementation of these capital works, for the advantages that can often be achieved. These include:
· The pre-tender phase is likely to be shorter than for a traditional construction contract because it is only necessary to prepare the Design Brief, rather than the detailed design which would take substantially longer prior to inviting tenders. The detailed design work is able to be performed after execution of the Design and Construct Contract, and during the early stages of construction, in a staged manner.
· A Design and Construct Contract requires the contractor to tender on the works described in the Design Brief (prepared by the Principal), and tender not only for the construction of the works described in that Design Brief, but also for the completion of the detailed design, consistent with that Design Brief.
· Potential to reduce the overall cost of construction to the Principal.
· Potential for advantages of design efficiencies which Contractors, through their contracting experience, may be able to incorporate into the design of the works, which may have the effect of reducing construction cost.
Prior to calling tenders for the design and construction, it is considered necessary to call for Expressions of Interest for suitably qualified and experienced construction companies in anticipation that comprehensive tenders would be received.
Governance Matters
This tender process complies with procurement best practice, Council policy and legislative requirements.
Risk Management
Contractor Risk Management is a key focus of the organisation, given the nature of these works, the public will most likely perceive the contractors as the ‘face of Council’ and as such need to have effective Risk Management practices in place.
Respondents’ Risk Management practices were one of the selection criteria used to shortlist the nominated selected tenderers to ensure that contractors have suitable Risk Management practices in place. Key areas requirements include:
· certified management systems or management systems meeting relevant Australian Standard.
· effective Risk Management practices including, safety management (both workers and public), environmental management, quality management, community and disruption management.
For Council, the major risks to the design and construction of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Wahroonga are:
1) ability of the contractor to complete the project;
2) construction cost; and
3) long term stability of structures given proximity to areas of landfill.
Risk (1) is managed through the assessment of the corporate capability and structure of the nominated tenderers.
Risk (2) is managed by Council not awarding a contract until the construction cost is known.
Risk (3) is managed by Council by structural engineering as part of the design and construction process with referencing of the detailed geotechnical and geophysical investigations of the sub-strata. Footings and piles will be founded on natural ground and embedded into rock.
In the long term, the facilities are subject to fire risk. To provide optimum safety against direct flame attack the building will comply with the BAL-FZ construction requirements, which is the highest standard of construction
Financial Considerations
Council accepting the EOI’s and calling a select tender involves minimal cost to Council. Full financial consideration must be given at the time of accepting a tender. A further report will be presented to Council to accept the preferred tender and a full financial analysis will be undertaken at that time.
Social Considerations
This work forms part of Councils on-going commitment to upgrade essential building infrastructure that support combat agencies responding to hazards throughout the Council area, as well as out-of-area responses to emergencies.
This project is identified in Council’s Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2010-2014 prepared by Council.
Environmental Considerations
Respondents’ environmental programs were incorporated into one of the selection criteria used to shortlist the nominated selected tenderers. Environmental and sustainability initiatives are part of the design of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and Bush Fire Brigade facilities and were considered in the DA process.
Community Consultation
Specific public consultation in relation to the EOI process is not required.
The establishment and development of design plans culminating in the approved DA has built upon the extensive consultation already carried out for this project. The DA for the project has undergone the required notification process.
Internal Consultation
This report was prepared by Operations Department with assistance from Council’s Strategy and Environment Department.
Summary
This report discusses the outcomes of the Expression of Interest (EOI) for the design and construction of facilities for the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and the Bush Fire Brigade located Golden Jubilee Field, Wahroonga and seeks approval to call select tenders from the recommended short listed companies as determined by the Tender Evaluation Committee.
A design and construct approach is the preferred method for the implementation of these capital works. The expected advantages are that the pre-tender phase would be likely shorter than for a traditional construction contract, work would be able to be performed in a staged manner, overall cost of construction would be reduced and design efficiencies would be identified through contractors experience.
A. That Council approve the calling of select tenders from the recommended short listed companies listed in the report for the design and construction of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and the Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Golden Jubilee Field, Wahroonga.
B. That a further report be brought back to Council following the evaluation of select tenders submitted for the design and construction of the Ku-ring-gai State Emergency Services and the Bush Fire Brigade facilities at Golden Jubilee Field, Wahroonga.
|
Ian Taylor Manager Engineering Services |
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
Confidential report by TEC for EOI 11/2011 - Design and Construction of Emergency Services |
|
Confidential |
Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2012 |
GB.14 / 560 |
|
|
Item GB.14 |
S08356 |
|
24 January 2012 |
Tender T48/2011 - Allan Small Park Sports Multi-court & Playground Upgrade
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
purpose of report: |
To consider the tenders received for the supply and installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at Allan Small Park, Saiala Road, East Killara and appoint the preferred tenderer. |
|
|
background: |
Council, as part of the Open Space Capital Works Program, approved funding for the refurbishment and upgrade of Allan Small Park. This work includes the installation of a sports multi-court and the refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground. |
|
|
comments: |
Tender documents were produced with four (4) submissions received. The submissions were assessed using agreed criteria which identified the tender submission providing the best value to Council. |
|
|
recommendation: |
That Council accepts the tender from Court Craft Pty Ltd for the supply and installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at Allan Small Park, Saiala Road, East Killara. |
Purpose of Report
To consider the tenders received for the supply and installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at Allan Small Park, Saiala Road, East Killara and appoint the preferred tenderer.
Background
Council, as part of the Open Space Capital Works Program, approved funding for the refurbishment and upgrade of Allan Small Park. This work includes the installation of a sports multi-court and the refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground.
Comments
Four (4) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy.
Tenders were received from the following companies:
· Go Gardening
· Furnass Landscaping Pty Ltd
· Court Craft Pty Ltd
· Axis Construction Pty Ltd
A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations Department and Strategy and Environment Department was formed to assess the four (4) tenders received. The evaluation took into account, the lump sum fee, provisional rates, company and staff experience, the ability to provide the full range of services required, proposed work program, previous performance in relation to similar type work and the company’s financial capacity.
The confidential attachments to this report include the list of tenders received, the Tender Evaluation Panel’s evaluation / recommendation and a copy of the independent Performance and Financial Assessment which was carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd.
All four (4) companies were assessed as being suitably qualified to provide the services required. From the available information taken into account during the scoring from each element of the assessment, Court Craft Pty Ltd was identified as providing the best value to Council. In order to ensure that Council is not exposed to financial risk and that Court Craft Pty Ltd are trading in ‘sound and profitable manner’, an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out by Corporate Scorecard.
Court Craft Pty Ltd is identified as providing the ‘best value’ to Council.
Governance Matters
At the close of tenders, four (4) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy.
A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations Department and Strategy and Environment Department was formed to assess the four (4) tenders received. The evaluation took into account, the lump sum fee, provisional rates, company and staff experience, the ability to provide the full range of services required, proposed work program, previous performance in relation to similar type work and the company’s financial capacity.
The confidential attachments to this report include the list of tenders received, the Tender Evaluation Panel’s evaluation / recommendation and the independent Performance and Financial Assessment carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd. The evaluation process has been independently checked by Council’s Tender Review Committee to ensure that it was carried out in accordance with sound and fair practices.
The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(ii) of the Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.
Risk Management
Two (2) key areas of risk were identified in relation to the proposed work:
· that work needed to be carried out by a suitably qualified company with experience of sports courts and children’s playgrounds.
· that Council should not be exposed to financial risk.
As part of the evaluation process, the tenderers combined lump sum price and provisional rates were assessed along with their ability, experience and documented evidence of previous work of a similar nature. All four (4) tenderers demonstrated:
· A good understanding of the requirements of the work required.
· Previous experience of carrying out work of a similar nature.
· Quality results in relation to previous work of a similar nature.
Following this initial evaluation, the tenderer assessed as providing the best value and quality to Council was Court Craft Pty Ltd. In order to ensure that Council would not be exposed to financial risk, an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out on Court Craft Pty Ltd.
As part of this assessment the following areas were examined:
· that Court Craft Pty Ltd had the financial capacity to undertake the proposed value of work;
· that Court Craft Pty Ltd has been trading in a profitable and responsible manner during the last three (3) years; and
· that Court Craft Pty Ltd has sufficient assets / reserves to cover all possible debts during the period of work.
The financial aspect of the assessment shows that Court Craft Pty Ltd is able to satisfy all requirements and is unlikely to expose Council to any financial risk if awarded the work of supplying and installing the sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground as detailed within Council’s tender documents.
Financial Considerations
Council’s adopted Capital Works Program 2011/2012 has allocated funding for the installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at, Allan Small Park, Saiala Road, East Killara. The proposed work will be funded from the funding resources as listed below.
· PJ101557 - Allan Small Park Playground and Courts Upgrade
Social Considerations
Allan Small Park is categorised as a “Sportsground” within Council’s open space system. The park is located in a bushland setting at the top end of a local valley and is overlooked by surrounding residences. The park currently provides a range of recreational, leisure and sporting facilities for the surrounding community and local sporting groups.
The proposed improvement works are in accordance with a Landscape Masterplan for the park which was prepared in consultation with local residents and relevant stakeholder groups. The proposed works will enhance the recreational value of the park, improve general access and safety, and create greater opportunities for social interaction as well as providing health and wellbeing benefits for users.
Public access to that part of the park affected by site works will not be possible during the construction period to ensure the safety of park users.
The proposed works are in keeping with the following adopted Council policies and plans:
People, parks and bushland, Open Space Strategy for Ku-ring-gai (KMC 2005). |
Proposed works are in line with strategies including those to upgrade playgrounds in accordance with demonstrated needs; to provide carer support facilities; and to ensure that designated play areas are large enough to incorporate both structured play equipment and ‘free play’ space. |
Community Strategic Plan 2030 |
Proposed works are in line with the Plan’s long term directions to meet a number of 20 year visions including the objective to increase participation in social, sporting and recreational activities; and to provide quality open space, community and recreational facilities to meet the needs of our community. |
Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2010-2014 |
Proposed works are in line with the Plan’s four (4) year objectives for the provision of open space and recreational facilities that meet the needs of our changing community. |
Environmental Considerations
The work involves rebuilding and refurbishment of existing facilities and will include:
· A new all-weather multi-purpose sports court with lighting and fencing;
· A youth activity area with rebound wall and adjoining sitting area;
· A new playground area suitable for older age children; and
· General access and amenity improvements.
SEPP Infrastructure and DCP 46 Exempt and Complying Development apply to the range of works proposed and as such formal development consent is not required.
Proposed works aim to maintain, preserve and maximize retention of existing trees and surrounding native vegetation, as well as relieving localised soil compaction and erosion issues. The works will require the removal of one existing planted tree.
As part of standard construction practice, suitable environmental management controls will be required to be implemented by the appointed contractor. Specific environmental requirements, procedures and precautionary treatments will include erosion and drainage control measures and silt management.
Excess overland flow and subsurface drainage will be directed to an existing stormwater bio-filtration area to promote nutrient absorption prior to being released to the local stormwater system.
Community Consultation
Allan Small Park is categorised as a “Sportsground” within Council’s open space system. Improvements to the park have been proposed as part of Council’s 2010/11 Operational Plan and Delivery Program.
A Landscape Masterplan has been prepared to coordinate and guide proposed works. The Masterplan was developed with the assistance of relevant stakeholders and distributed to local residents for comment. It provides a holistic approach to the park’s design which allows for staged implementation of works and local residents have been advised that Council will be implementing improvements as funding becomes available for the various components of the plan.
Prior to tendering this stage of the works detailed design plans were modified where appropriate to accommodate comments received from residents and stakeholders during the consultation process.
Following appointment of a suitable contractor, local residents will be notified of the commencement of works and that public access to part of the park will not be possible during the construction period.
Internal Consultation
Consultation across Council Departments was undertaken by officers from Strategy and Environment during the development of the Landscape Masterplan and in the preparation of detailed designs for proposed improvements prior to handover of the project to the Operations Department for tendering and construction.
Tender assessment has been undertaken jointly by officers from both the Operations Department and the Strategy and Environment Department.
Summary
Council, as part of the 2011/2012 Open Space Capital Works Program, approved funding for the supply and installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at, Allan Small Park, Saiala Road, East Killara.
Tenders were called in November 2011 with a closing date of 20 December 2011. A tender evaluation team was formed consisting of representatives from the Operations Department and Strategy & Environment Department. The preferred tenderer was identified as Court Craft Pty Ltd.
All tenderers demonstrated an understanding of the work required.
Following the evaluation and independent performance and financial checks, it is recommended that Court Craft Pty Ltd be appointed on the basis of providing the best value to Council.
A. That Council accept the tender from Court Craft Pty Ltd to carry out the supply and installation of a sports multi-court and refurbishment and upgrade of the children’s playground at Allan Small Park , Saiala Road, East Killara.
B. That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.
C. That the seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.
D. That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.
|
David Morris Manager Open Space Projects |
Greg Piconi Director Operations |
Tendered cost reviews |
|
Confidential |
||
|
Tender Evaluation of submitted tenderers |
|
Confidential |
|
|
Performance and Financial Assessment |
|
Confidential |