Ordinary Meeting of Council

TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 10 May 2016 AT 7:00 pm

Level 3, Council Chamber

 

Agenda

** ** ** ** ** **

 

 

NOTE:  For Full Details, See Council’s Website –

www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers

 

 

APOLOGIEs

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

 

Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting

 

NOTE:

 

That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:

 

Refer GB.5              Lindfield Village Green - Design Services - Request for Tender No. 07-2016

Attachment A1: . Tender Evaluation Report for Tender No. 07/2016

In accordance with 10A(2)(d)(i)

Refer GB.7              Tender 13/2015 and Tender 02/2016 Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street Drainage construction work

Attachment A1: ................................ Tender Evaluation Report

In accordance with 10A(2)(d)(ii)


 

 

 

Address the Council

NOTE:           Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.

 

Documents Circulated to Councillors

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council                                                                         6

 

File: S02131

Meeting held 26 April 2016

Minutes numbered 70 to 88

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

Petitions

 

PT.1         Petition - Objection to Proposed Construction of Rural Fire Service Station at Koola Avenue Killara (Fourteen [14] Signatures)                                                                  54

 

File: S02542/16

 

“We the undersigned wish to protest against the proposed construction of a Rural Fire Service Station on the Car Park adjacent to the shops in Koola Avenue, Killara. The parking area has recently been saved from being included in the release of 3 blocks of land including this parking area, which had been planned by Council for residential development.

 

Having successfully had that plan rejected we were told that the parking area was now dedicated and safe from any development and this area is so badly needed for the all day and part day parking of the business proprietors and their staff and visiting professionals and tradesmen attending to the shops.

 

We suggest that should a RFS Station be necessary in Killara be necessary and needed, then a site adjacent to the Scout Hall in Koola Avenue, well away from the shops or a site adjacent to this small car park on land owned by Council.

 

Please listen to the many objections to this unexpected and unnecessary proposal.’

 

Recommendation:

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

i.               The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.

 

ii.             The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.

 

GB.1        Review of the Local Government Rating System - Submission to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART)                                                                    55

 

File: S06788/4

 

To advise Council on IPART’s review of the rating system for local government in NSW and to seek Council’s endorsement of a submission to IPART.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council delegate to the General Manager the authority to finalise and lodge its submission on the “Review of the Local Government Rating System” Issues Paper.

 

GB.2        Local Government and Shires Association Board of Directors Election - Nomination of Voting Delegates                                                                                                         140

 

File: S02046/9

 

To inform Council about the upcoming election for the Local Government and Shires Association (LGNSW) Board of Directors and determine which Councillors will be nominated to act as Ku-ring-gai’s voting delegates.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council determines its seven (7) voting delegates for the 2016 LGNSW Board Elections.

 

GB.3        DA0160/15 - 35 Millewa Street, Wahroonga - Construction of 4 townhouses and associated site and landscaping works                                                                    150

 

File: DA0160/15

 

Ward: Wahroonga

Applicant: Urbanesque Planning Pty Ltd

Owner: James Mackenzie

 

Construction of 4 townhouses and associated site and landscaping works

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval

 

GB.4        Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study                                                                                 225

 

File: S09972

 

To report on the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study Draft Report public exhibition and seek Council’s endorsement of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council endorses the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report with minor amendments, as detailed in this report.

 

GB.5        Lindfield Village Green - Design Services - Request for Tender No. 07-2016  234

 

File: CY00368/6

 

To advise Council of the Tenders received for Tender No.07-2016 - Lindfield Village Green - Design Services and to seek approval to carry out the actions outlined in the recommendations A to F.

 

Recommendation:

 

In accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations, it is recommended that Council decline all submissions and authorise negotiations with the tenders submitted by tenderers ‘A’ to ‘D’ as identified in the Confidential Attachment A1 to this report.

 

GB.6        Lindfield Learning Village Draft Heads of Agreement                                            240

 

File: S08640/3

 

To seek Council’s support for an “in-principle” agreement to the Draft Heads of Agreement for the Lindfield Learning Village at the former University of Technology site at Lindfield

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council advise the Department of Education of its “in-principle” agreement for community use of various facilities on the site in accordance with the Draft Heads of Agreement attached to this report.

 


 

GB.7        Tender 13/2015 and Tender 02/2016 Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street Drainage construction work                                                                                                           272

 

File: S10668

 

To consider tenders received for the construction of stormwater drainage works in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street, Roseville and appoint the preferred tenderer

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council reject the tender submitted for the construction of the stormwater drainage in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street, Roseville.

  

Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting

 

Motions of which due Notice has been given

 

BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS

 

 

Questions Without Notice

 

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

 

** ** ** ** ** **


Minute                                           Ku-ring-gai Council                                               Page

MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 26 April 2016

 

Present:

The Mayor, Councillor C Szatow (Chairperson) (Gordon Ward)

Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward)

Councillor D Citer (Gordon Ward)

Councillors C Berlioz & D Ossip (St Ives Ward)

Councillors J Anderson & D Armstrong (Roseville Ward)

Councillors C Fornari-Orsmond & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward)

 

 

Staff Present:

General Manager (John McKee)

Director Corporate (David Marshall)

Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic)

Director Operations (Greg Piconi)

Acting Director Strategy & Environment (Marnie Kikken)

Acting Director Community (Danny Houseas)

Corporate Lawyer (Jamie Taylor)

Manager Corporate Communications (Virginia Leafe)

Manager Records and Governance (Amber Moloney)

Minutes Secretary (Sigrid Banzer)

 

 

Others Present:

Manager Finance (Angela Apostol)

Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets (Deborah Silva)

 

 

 

The Meeting commenced at 7:00 pm

 

The Mayor offered the Prayer

 

 

Apologies

 

The General Manager advised that the Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson) is on leave and Ms Kikken is Acting Director Strategy & Environment.

 

The General Manager advised that the Director Community (Janice Bevan) is on leave and Mr Houseas is Acting Director Community.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.

 

Cr Citer declared a significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in respect to item NM.1 Local Government Reform – Legal Obligations. On 22 February 2016 Cr Citer was elected Vice President of the Hornsby State Electorate and believed that his election to this position has affected his ability to vote impartially on the item. He withdrew from the Chamber taking no part in the discussion and voting on the item.

 

Cr Ossip declared an less than significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest –
GB.5 7, 9 & 11 College Crescent & 140 Killeaton Street, St Ives – Demolition of existing structures, consolidation of four lots and construction of a multi-unit dwelling development comprising 27 units, basement car parking, landscaping and infrastructure works as he is a close family friend of one of the owners of the property in question. He withdrew from the Chamber taking no part in the discussion and voting on the item.

 

 

69

CONFIRMATION OF REPORTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CLOSED MEETING

 

File: S02499/9

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Malicki/McDonald)

 

A.     That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of the following Confidential report and respective attachments:

 

C.1     Merger Proposal - Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council

In accordance with s10A(2)(g)

 

B.     That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of the confidential attachments to the following Notice of Motion item:

 

NM.1       Local Government Reform - Legal Obligations

Attachment A1:    Memorandum of Advice by John Robson SC and Verity McWilliam - 7 March 2016

In accordance with s10A(2)(g)

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Address the Council

 

The following member(s) of the public address Council on items not on the agenda:

 

J Buist                                      North Connex – Compound at Carrington Park

G Hosier                                   Future of Ku-ring-gai

 

A Motion was moved by Councillors Malicki and Szatow
not to hear the speaker Gerard Hosier at this time

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Szatow, Councillors , McDonald, Malicki and Berlioz

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Citer, Pettett, Armstrong, Anderson, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

No decision was taken in respect of the above matter as

the Motion when put to the vote was LOST

 

 

DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS

 

The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:

 

Memorandums:

OMC62 – Innovation Business Forum – Question Without Notice from Councillor McDonald – Memorandum from Director Community dated 21 April 2016.

OMC338 – Hoarding Disorder – Question Without Notice from Councillor Jennifer Anderson – Memorandum from Director Community dated 22 April 2016

OMC26 April 2016 – GB.1 Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Draft Operational Plan 2016-2017 – Capital Works Program – Memorandum from Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets dated 26 April 2016.

Councillors Information:

QWN            St Ives Showground Army Relief Map

Memorandum from Director Operations dated 7 April 2016 responding to a Question without Notice from Councillor Berlioz regarding the installation of interpretive signs at St Ives Showground.

 

QWN            Wahroonga Park Toilet Block

Memorandum from Director Operations dated 7 April 2016 responding to a Question without Notice from Councillor McDonald regarding the opening of the new toilet block at Wahroonga Park.

 

QWN            Support for the Returned and Services League (RSL) during Centenary of ANZAC Commemorations

Memorandum from Acting General Manger dated 18 April 2016 responding to a Question without Notice from Councillor Anderson regarding supporting the RSL during the Centenary of ANZAC Commemorations.

Late Confidential Items:

C.1 - Merger Proposal - Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council - Report by Director Corporate dated 26 April 2016 an attachment.

Confidential Late Agenda Memo:

Item C.1 – Confidential Item – Merger Proposal – Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council - Memo from Director Corporate dated 26 April 2016.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

70

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

File: S02131

 

Meeting held 5 April 2016

Minutes numbered 49 to 68

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/McDonald)

 

That Minutes numbered 49 to 68 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

 

Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion

Councillor Ossip returned

 

 

71

Subsidy of Council Services

 

File: S06887

Vide: MM.1

 

 

Ku-ring-gai Council provides a broad range of services (infrastructure, facilities and programs) for its community.  These services range from the provision of roads and footpaths, parks and ovals, regulatory services such as development assessment and compliance, garbage collection, libraries, childcare, youth services, golf courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, community centres, events, environmental education and animal control.

 

Funding for these services includes property rates, interest on investments, rental income, developer contributions, grants from other levels of government and user fees and charges. 

The proportion that Council services are funded from user fees and charges rather than other revenues reflects, to varying degrees, the proportion of public versus private use.  In other words if the individual beneficiaries of a service or facility are not readily identifiable, such as for roads and footpaths, a service or facility is usually funded entirely from revenues such as rates and grants.  If the particular users of a service or facility are identifiable, such as for tennis courts, then user fees and charges can be applied to cover the full or part cost of the service. 

 

Services for which there are identifiable beneficiaries, and for which only part of the costs are recovered from direct fees and charges, are subsidised by the wider community.  The amount of this subsidy at Ku-ring-gai Council varies substantially between services.  While some are almost entirely funded from general revenues, such as libraries, others are almost entirely funded from user fees and charges, such as the garbage service.  In between is a wide range of services which are partly subsidised.

 

The amount of subsidy provided to particular services has in many cases developed historically over a long period of time.  While Council has reviewed the fees and charges for a range of activities in recent years, for reasons of equity and to ensure the best value is received from ratepayer funds, it is time for a root and branch review of the subsidy provided to all of our services in conjunction with the development of a policy to guide the future allocation of subsidies.

 

 

Resolved:

 

That a report be provided to Council setting out a program and timeframe for the development of a policy and review of the subsidy provided to all Council services.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Szatow, Councillors , Citer, McDonald, Malicki, Armstrong, Berlioz, Anderson, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillor Pettett

 

 

 

Recommendations from Committee

 

 

Minutes of Ku-ring-gai Traffic Committee

 

File: CY00022/8

Vide: RC.1

 

 

Meeting held 31 March 2016

Minutes numbered KTC1 to KTC4.

 

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:

M Lane

M Drake

 

 

 

 

72

General Matter Items Under Delegated Authority

 

File: S02738

Vide Minute No  KTC01

 

 

Advice on matters considered under Delegated Authority.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/McDonald)

 

That the information regarding traffic facilities approved during November 2015 to March 2016 be noted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

73

Road Safety Audit Eastern Arterial Road, St Ives

 

File: S02904

 

Ward: St Ives

Electorate: Davidson

Vide Minute No  KTC02

 

 

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/McDonald)

 

A.    That Council undertake pavement resurfacing treatment on the bend in Eastern Arterial Road between both ends of Nicholson Avenue and the use of slag enhanced modified asphalt..

 

B.    That Council investigate the treatments in Eastern Arterial Road, between Barra-Brui Crescent and south of Nicholson Avenue, identified in the Road Safety Analysis/Audit Report (Figure 23 – Appendix No. 1 and Table 9-1 prepared by Cardno Consulting, and a report be referred back to the Traffic Committee with Council’s findings.

 

C.    That Council request the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) to implement 50 km/h speed limit in Eastern Arterial Road between Eucalyptus Street/Hunter Avenue and Koola Avenue, as recommended in Cardno’s RSA report.

 

D.    That Council undertake an audit of the reconstruction of the section of Eastern Arterial Road near Nicholson Avenue in 2013, including a detailed review of the road alignment, road radius and road super-evaluation to identify the root cause of the existing problems as recommended in the Cardno report.

 

E.    That existing kerbside lane closure arrangement on the city bound direction in Eastern Arterial Road be maintained until the proposed pavement resurfacing treatment is carried out to improve skid resistance.

 

F.    That Council apply for funding under the NSW Safer Road Programme and the Australian Government Black Spot Programmes, for eligible treatments.

 

G.    That the residents of Eastern Arterial Road who were consulted by Cardno Consulting as part of the RSA Audit be informed of Council’s decision.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

74

Road Safety Audit Burns Road, Turramurra

 

File: S02904

 

Ward: Wahroonga

Electorate: Ku-ring-gai

Vide Minute No  KTC03

 

 

To consider recommended treatments along Burns Road, Wahroonga, identified with a safety risk in the Roads Safety Analysis/Audit Report (March 2016).

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/McDonald)

 

A.   That Council approve in principle the recommended traffic calming treatments in Burns Road at Clissold Road intersection and near Hampden Avenue as shown in Figures 21 and 22 of the Road safety Analysis/Audit reports prepared by Cardno Consulting.

 

B.   That Council approve in principle the other recommended treatments in Burns Road, between Finchley Place and Hampden Avenue, as identified in the Road Safety Analysis/Audit reports prepared by Cardno Consulting.

 

C.   That Council request the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) to implement 50 km/h speed limit in Burns Road between Eastern Road and Bobbin Head road, as recommended in the Cardno’s RSA report.

 

D.   That Council undertake pavement resurfacing treatment at the intersection of Burns Road and Clissold Road.

 

E.   That further investigation be undertaken to consider traffic calming treatments in Burns Road between Hampden Avenue and Clissold Road.

 

F.   That the residents of Burns Road who were consulted by Cardno Consulting as part of the RSA Audit be informed of Council’s decision.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

 

75

Henry Street, Gordon

 

File: TM4/08

 

Ward: Gordon

Electorate: Davidson

Vide Minute No  KTC04

 

 

To consider the installation of a roundabout at the intersection of Henry Street and the railway underpass road at Gordon.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/McDonald)

 

That a roundabout at the intersection of Henry Street and the railway underpass road at Gordon be approved in principle subject to the funds being made available from a number of funding sources.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

  

 

PETITIONS

 

76

Petition from FOKE Opposing Forced Council Amalgamations - Twenty Three (23) Signatures

 

File: S10860

Vide: PT.1

 

 

‘We the undersigned, submit a petition calling on all Councillors to pursue every avenue possible to prevent the forced amalgamation with Hornsby Shire, including legal action’.

 

Thank you for supporting Ku-ring-gai as a stand-alone council with its 110 years of distinguished history and traditions in protecting Ku-ring-gai’s unique built and natural environment.

 

Today FOKE ran the first of a series of three events to celebrate the 2016 National Trust Heritage Festival – the Paddy Pallin Walk.

 

This incredibly popular walk brought people across the Sydney metropolitan, and as far as Nowra on the South Coast, to visit Ku-ring-gai and learn about Paddy Pallin (1900-1991) who made such a significant contribution to the Australian conservation movement and is remembered by the Paddy Pallin Reserve, Lindfield.

 

The guests attending this walk strongly opposed the NSW Government’s forced council amalgamation agenda that threatens to destroy not only Ku-ring-gai but many local government areas across NSW.

 

We thus submit a petition calling on all Councillors to pursue every avenue possible to prevent the forced amalgamation with Hornsby Shire, including legal action.

 

We ask that you present this petition to the Ku-ring-gai Council meeting of Tuesday 26 April 2016.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Malicki)

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

77

Investment Report as at 31 March 2016

 

File: S05273

Vide: GB.2

 

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for March 2016.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)

 

A.       That the summary of investments and performance for March 2016 be received and noted.

 

B.       That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

78

Mayors' Weekend Seminar 2016

 

File: FY00581

Vide: GB.4

 

 

To inform Councillors of the upcoming Mayors’ Weekend Seminar hosted by Local Government NSW on the 21 and 22 May 2016 in Sydney.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Armstrong)

 

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2016 Mayors’ Weekend Seminar advise the General Manager by Friday, 13 May 2016.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Szatow, Councillors , McDonald, Malicki, Armstrong, Berlioz, Anderson, Citer, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillor Pettett

 

 

 

Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion

 

 

79

7, 9 & 11 College Crescent & 140 Killeaton Street, St Ives - Demolition of existing structures, consolidation of four lots and construction of a multi unit dwelling development comprising 27 units, basement car parking, landscaping and infrastructure works

 

File: DA0131/15

Vide: GB.5

 

 

To determine Development Application No. DA0131/15 for the demolition of existing structures, consolidation of four lots and construction of a multi unit dwelling development comprising 27 units, basement car parking, landscaping and infrastructure works.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Citer)

 

A.   THAT Council, as the consent authority, grant  development consent to DA0131/15 for the consolidation of four lots and construction of a multi dwelling development comprising 27 town houses, basement car parking, landscaping and infrastructure works on land at 7, 9 & 11 College Crescent & 140 Killeaton Street, St Ives, for a period of two years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

DA001 – Rev. B: Site plan

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA002 – Rev. C: Basement

Nkt Architecture

26/02/2016

DA003 – Rev. C: Ground floor

Nkt Architecture

26/02/2016

DA004 – Rev. B: First floor

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA005 – Rev. B: Second floor

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA006 – Rev. B: Roof

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA111 – Rev. B: Demolition

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA101 – Rev. B: Bldg A

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA102 – Rev. B: Bldg B

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA103 – Rev. B: Bldg C floor

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA104 – Rev. B: Bldg C elev/sec

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA105 – Rev. B: Bldg D

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

DA106 – Rev. B: Bldg E

Nkt Architecture

05/11/2015

L001 Sheet 1 Rev C: Landscape

Peta Gilliland

24/02/2016

L001 Sheet 2 Rev C: Landscape

Peta Gilliland

24/02/2016

DA3.02 Rev 9: Stormwater mgmt

Sparkes + Partners

22/02/2016

 

Document(s)

Dated

Finishes and materials board (Nkt Architecture)

17 March 2015

Basix certificate No. 614946M_04

1 March 2016

Geotechnical Investigation Report (Asset Geotechnical Engineering Pty Ltd)

28 February 2015

Access report (Ergon Consulting)

8 April 2015

Waste management plan (Nicolas Tedesco)

1 April 2015

Preliminary Site Investigation (Molino Stewart Pty Ltd)

27 October 2015

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

3.     Approved landscape plans

 

Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

L001 Sheet 1 Rev C L002 Sheet 2 Rev C

Peta Gilliland

24/02/2016

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

In accordance with the submitted Preliminary Site Investigation (Molino Stewart Pty Ltd), during site earthworks if any suspected bonded asbestos sheeting is found in the soil, a qualified occupational hygienist should be engaged to sample and test the soil and any asbestos contaminated soil be removed by a licensed contractor and disposed of appropriately at a licensed waste facility.

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety.

 

5.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

7.     Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·           Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of College Crescent over the site frontage.

·           All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:         A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:     To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

8.     Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for a 12.5 metre long heavy rigid vehicle and if required for demolition and excavation stages a 19.0 metre long articulated vehicle are to be shown.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·      Demolition

·      Excavation

·      Concrete pour

·      Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·      Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site

·      Pedestrian safety measures to be shown.

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users. 

 

NO construction vehicles movements are to occur during the school drop-off (8.00am to 9.30am) and pick-up hours (2.30pm to 4.00pm) on school days.

 

When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:   To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

9.     Work zone

 

A works zone shall be provided along the site frontage. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.

 

A 'No Parking' restriction opposite the access is recommended for the construction period given the curved nature of the road.

 

If the work zone and 'No Parking' restriction is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.

 

Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.

 

In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.

 

Reason:    To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.

 

10.   Sediment controls

 

Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.

 

The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

11.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Tree/Location

Radius in metres

Camellia hedge Eastern site boundary

1m offset from hedge

T4 Corymbia citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum) Adjacent to eastern site boundary in neighbouring site

4.0m

T21 Sapium sebiferum (Chinese Tallow) Western site boundary/access handle

3.0m (Edge of driveway if used for access with trunk protection as per Section 10.5 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural dated April 2015)

T22 Agathis robusta (Kauri Pine) Killeaton St site frontage

3.0m (Edge of driveway if used for access with trunk protection as per Section 10.5 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural dated April 2015)

T55 Camellia sasanqua (Chinese Camellia) Western site boundary/SW site corner

2.5m

T68 Liquidambar orientalis (Oriental Sweetgum) College Cres nature strip

Top of kerb, 7.0m elsewhere while maintaining pedestrian access with strapped boardwalk over root zone

T69 Liquidambar orientalis (Oriental Sweetgum) College Cres nature strip

Top of kerb, 7.0m elsewhere while maintaining pedestrian access with strapped boardwalk over root zone

T70 Liquidambar orientalis (Oriental Sweetgum) College Cres nature strip

Top of kerb, 7.0m elsewhere while maintaining pedestrian access with strapped boardwalk over root zone

T71 Stenocarpus sinuatus (Firewheel Tree) College Cres nature strip

Top of kerb, 2.0m elsewhere while maintaining pedestrian access with strapped boardwalk

T73 Eucalyptus scoparia (Willow Gum) College Cres site frontage

Top of kerb, 7.0m elsewhere while maintaining pedestrian access with strapped boardwalk over root zone

T79 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum) Eastern site corner in neighbouring site

Top of kerb, 8.0m elsewhere

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

12.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:   To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

13.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone.

 

·           This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·           Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report.

·           The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

·           The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council.

·           The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

14.   Tree protection mulching

 

Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

15.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:     To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

16.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:         The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:     To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

17.   Noise and vibration management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.  The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.

 

The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:

 

·           identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources

·           identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment

·           the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent

·           the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent

·           determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver

·           noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures

·           assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions

·           description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction

·           construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency

·           procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration

·           contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.

 

18.   CCTV report of existing pipe system near works

 

Prior to the commencement of any works on site, a qualified practitioners must undertake a closed circuit television inspection and then report on the existing condition of the drainage pipeline within the easement traversing the subject property. The report is to include a copy of the video footage of the pipeline and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

Reason:    To protect infrastructure.

 

19.   Hazardous materials survey

 

In accordance with the submitted Preliminary Site Investigation (Molino Stewart Pty Ltd), prior to demolition, a hazardous materials survey is to be conducted of each of the buildings to identify lead based paint, asbestos, synthetic mineral fibres and polychlorinated byphenols which may be in the building materials. If present they should be removed by a licensed contractor and disposed of appropriately at a licensed waste facility.

 

Details are to be provided to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority to this effect.

 

Reason:   Environmental protection.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

20.   Amendments to approved engineering plans

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

The Stormwater Management Plan DA3.02/9 prepared by Sparkes + Partners shall be amended as follows:

 

·          delete swale drain and raised berm along the College Cresent frontage to minimise tree impacts.

 

Note:         An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

21.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

22.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

23.   Outdoor lighting

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Note:         Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:     To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.

 

24.   Air drying facilities

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.

 

In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    Amenity & energy efficiency.

 

25.   Setback of private courtyards

 

Private courtyards are to be set back a minimum of 3.0 metres from neighbouring property boundaries. The setback area is to be dedicated to landscaped common open space.

 

Details to this effect are to be indicated on the plans prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    To ensure landscaping amenity for the development within common open space.

 

26.   External service pipes and the like prohibited

 

Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building.  Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans.  Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.

 

Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation.  The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.

 

Reason:    To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.

 

27.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the  plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:     To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

28.   Adaptable units

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application, [T/H 14, 15 and 16], are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.

 

Note:         Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Disabled access & amenity.

 

29.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:         A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure the protection of trees.

 

30.   Recycling and waste management

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the development provides a common garbage collection/separation area(s) sufficient in size to store all wheelie garbage bins and recycling bins provided by Council for the number of units in the development in accordance with Council’s DCP. The nominated garbage collection point is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services.

 

The responsibility for:

 

·           the cleaning of waste rooms and waste service compartments; and

·           the transfer of bins within the property, and to the collection point once the development is in use;

 

shall be determined when designing the system and clearly stated in the Waste Management Plan.

 

Reason:     Environmental protection.

 

31.   Noise from plant in residential zone

 

Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.

 

C1.   Note:  A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.

 

Reason:       To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.

 

32.   Location of plant (residential flat buildings)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.

 

C1.   Note:  Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:       To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.

 

33.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:      To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

34.   Driveway grades - basement carparks

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:

 

·           vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and

·           all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles. 

 

If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.

 

Reason:    To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

35.   Basement car parking details

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:

 

·           all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking”

·           a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (Volume C Part 3.4 of the Local Centres DCP for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement

·           no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area

·           the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans

 

Reason:    To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

36.   Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in College Crescent.

 

(i)   A detail of the stormwater pipeline, junction pits and kerb inlet pits to Council's existing kerb inlet pit in College Crescent.

(ii)  All underground services for setting out for construction are to be shown.

(iii) An arboricultural impact assessment of all trees within 7 metres for the proposed excavation required for the 450mm diameter pipe to Council's existing kerb inlet pit in College Crescent.

 

Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve.  The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.

 

The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works.  Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 - 1996 - Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads - Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.

 

A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.

 

Reason:     To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.

 

37.   Energy Australia requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.

 

38.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

39.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:    To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

40.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)       All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)       The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)       The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)       In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)       In this condition:

 

“Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:     To maintain public infrastructure.

 

41.   Section 94 Contributions - Centres.

        (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010)

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Infrastructure Type                                                                      Total

LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural                                                  $51,548.03

St Ives TC New Roads & Road Mods                                                         $21,978.80

St Ives TC Local Parks & Sporting Facilities                                          $450,312.87

St Ives TC Townscape Transport & Pedest Fac                                      $241,337.21

 

Development Contributions Total   $765,176.91

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:    To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

42.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

43.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·           The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·           In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

44.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:          Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:     To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

45.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

46.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

47.   Construction noise

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.

 

Reason:    To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.

 

48.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·           be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·           display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·           be durable and weatherproof

·           display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·           be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety and public information.

 

49.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·           physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·           earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·           all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·           the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·           all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·           all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·           gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·           cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:    To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

50.   Post-construction dilapidation report

 

The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:

 

·           compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report

·           have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.

 

A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.

 

Reason:    Management of records.

 

51.   Compliance with submitted geotechnical report

 

A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.

 

Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:

 

·           appropriate excavation method and vibration control

·           support and retention of excavated faces

·           hydro-geological considerations

 

must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation Report prepared by Asset Geotechnical Engineering Pty Ltd dated 28 February 2015. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).

 

If groundwater monitoring indicates that constant pumping would be required for long-term basement drainage, then a tanked basement design is to be adopted. The NSW Office of Water will also require a licence to be obtained for temporary dewatering in excess of 3 megalitres. All requirements of NSW Office of Water are to be met during design, excavation and construction.

 

Reason:    To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

52.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:    To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

53.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety.

 

54.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

55.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:    To protect public places.

 

56.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:    To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

57.   Maintenance period for works in public road

 

A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.

 

Reason:    To protect public infrastructure.

 

58.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:    To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

59.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:    Provision of utility services.

 

60.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

61.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

62.   Arborist’s report

 

The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:

 

Tree/Location

Time of inspection

T3, T4, T5, T21, T22, T54, T55, T68, T69, T70, T71, T73, and T79

*Immediately prior to the commencement of ANY works on site *Certification of compliance with tree protection requirements in accordance with the consent conditions. *At the completion of bulk excavation works. *Direct supervision of ANY excavation within the identified areas as shown within Appendix 6 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated April 2015 with the addition of a 10m radius around T73 *At three monthly intervals during development works *At the completion of all works on site.

 

Reason:    To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

63.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

64.   Cutting of tree roots

 

No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T3, T4, T5, T21, T22, T54, T55, T68, T69, T70, T71, T73, and T79

Within the identified Tree Protection Zone as specified within Appendix 4 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated April 2015

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

65.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:

 

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15, T16, T17, T18, T19, T20, T72, T74, T75, T76, T77, T78, T80, T81, T82, T83, T84, T85, T86, T87, T88, T89, T90, T91, T92, T93, T94, T95, T96, T97, and T98 On site

Remove

 

All trees are to be clearly tagged consistent with the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated April 2015. Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Tree Preservation Order.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

66.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T3, T4, T5, T21, T22, T54, T55, T68, T69, T70, T71, T73, and T79

Within the identified Tree Protection Zone as specified within Appendix 4 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated April 2015

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

67.   Thrust boring

 

Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise the thrust boring method.  Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T4, T5, T21, T22, T54, T55, T68, T69, T70, T71, T73, and T79

Within the identified Tree Protection Zone as specified within Appendix 4 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated April 2015

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

68.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

69.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

70.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:    To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

71.   Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:

 

·           ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry,

·           certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and

·           certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.

·           This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab.

·           No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.  This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

Reason:    To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.

 

72.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·           Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·           This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:   To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

73.   Easement for waste collection

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property.  The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.

 

Reason:     To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.

 

74.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 614946M_04 have been complied with.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

75.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

76.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4R.9). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

77.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·           the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·           the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4B.5 respectively, have been achieved

·           retained water is connected and available for use

·           basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 4R.6

·           all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·           components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·           all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

Note:         Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:     To protect the environment.

 

78.   WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·           as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·           gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·           as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·           as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·           the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·           as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·           the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·           dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·           the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·           top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

79.   Basement pump-out maintenance

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.

 

Note:         A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

80.   OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part4R.9). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

81.   CCTV report of pipe after work

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a closed circuit television inspection and report on the interallotment drainage pipeline traversing the site is to be undertaken by appropriate contractors.  The report is to include a copy of the footage of the inside of the pipeline to the Principal Certifying Authority.  Any damage that has occurred to the section of the pipeline since the commencement of construction on the site must be repaired in full to the satisfaction of beneficiaries of the easement.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

82.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

83.   Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark - RFB

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·          the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans

 

·          the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking" and the Seniors Living State Environment Planning Policy in terms of minimum parking space dimensions

 

·          finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars

 

·          no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area

 

·          the vehicular headroom requirements of:

-   Australian Standard 2890.1 - “Off-street car parking”,

-   2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks (refer to Volume C Part 3.4(12) of the Local Centres DCP) are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.

 

Note:         Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant.

 

84.   Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:

 

·           new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council

·           removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials)

·           full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction

·           full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing

 

This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:    To protect the streetscape.

 

85.   Construction of works in public road – approved plans

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.

 

The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council.

 

The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings.  The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval.  All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued. 

 

Reason:     To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.

 

86.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:    To protect public infrastructure.

 

87.   Fire safety certificate

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.

Note:         A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:    To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

88.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

89.   No door restricting internal waste collection in basement

 

At all times, the basement garbage storage and collection area is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services. No doors, grilles, gates or other devices shall be provided in any location which would prevent this service. Where a gate, door or the like is to be erected, unimpeded access to the garbage collection point is to be provided by other means through written agreement with Council’s Waste Collection Services.

 

Reason:         To facilitate access to the garbage collection point.

 

90.   Noise control - plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

91.   Loading and unloading

 

At all times, all loading and unloading of service vehicles in connection with the use of the premises shall be carried out wholly within the site.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe traffic movement.

 

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Ossip returned

 

 

 

 

80

Minutes of the Heritage Reference Committee and the Committee's recommendations for the Heritage Home Fund 2015/16

 

File: CY00413/4

Vide: GB.6

 

 

For Council to consider the minutes of the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) meeting held on 11 November 2015 and the recommendations for the Heritage Home Fund 2015/16.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Anderson)

 

A.   That Council receive and note the Heritage Reference Committee meeting minutes of 11 November 2015.

 

B.   That Council approve the grant applications summarised in Attachment A2 for the Heritage Home Fund 2015/16 under the conditions outlined in the Heritage Home Fund guidelines, the requirements in the letter of offer from Council and the additional conditions in Attachment A2.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

81

Consideration of submissions on the planning proposal to list 25 Bushlands Avenue Gordon as a heritage item

 

File: S10968

Vide: GB.7

 

 

For Council to consider the submissions received during the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal to list 25 Bushlands Avenue, Gordon as a local heritage item.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Anderson)

 

A.   That the Planning Proposal to list the property known as ‘Birralee’ at 25 Bushlands Avenue, Gordon as a local heritage item under the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 proceed without variation.

 

B.   That Council proceed to make the Plan, using its delegated authority, under Section 59(2) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.

 

C.   That those who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

 

 

82

Draft Contaminated Land Policy for Public Exhibition

 

File: S02694

Vide: GB.8

 

 

To seek Council’s endorsement of the Draft Contaminated Land Policy 2016 for public exhibition.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Berlioz)

 

A.   That Council endorses the public exhibition of the Draft Contaminated Land Policy 2016.

 

B.   That following the close of the exhibition a report be brought back to Council to consider any submissions received.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

83

Creation of Easement over Council Land - Killara

 

File: CY00066/8

Vide: GB.9

 

 

To obtain Council approval to create an easement on Council land to benefit a private property at 18-20 Lady Game Drive, Killara.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Citer)

 

A.       That Council approve the creation of an easement at 16A Lady Game Drive Killara (Lot 39 DP22255) to benefit the adjoining property at 18-20 Lady Game Drive Killara (Lot 33 DP22255).

 

B.       That the General Manager or his delegate be authorised to negotiate Council’s requirements, including compensation for the creation of the easement over Council’s land at 16A Lady Game Drive Killara (Lot 39 DP22255).

 

C.       That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all documentation associated with the easement, including signing plans, administration sheets etc. and to affix Council’s Seal, if required.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Standing Orders were suspended to deal with items
where there are speakers first after a
Motion moved by Councillors Berlioz and Armstrong
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Citer withdrew during discussion

 

 

84

Local Government Reform - Legal Obligations

 

File: S10870

Vide: NM.1

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:

M Blay

R Barbero

B Meppem

D Greenfield

R Walker

P Truda

A Jones

N Spataro

S Marshall

J Harwood

C Sutherland

W Fentoullis

H Dingle

J Attenborough

A Pik

P Moate

U Bonzol

P Plummer

E Gross

C Doyle

C Drake

M Gooley

S Ackerman

K Cowley

C Smallbone

J Kitson

 

 

Notice of Rescission from Councillors Anderson, Fornari-Orsmond, Ossip and Pettett dated 18 April 2016

 

We, the undersigned, hereby move rescission of Minute No. 35/16 C.1. of the Ordinary Meeting of Council of 8th March 2016 (Attachment A General Manager's Confidential Report):

 

That Council comply with the recommended actions in the legal advice attached to this report.

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Armstrong)

 

That Council reaffirm its commitment to represent the best interests of the community by pursuing legal action against the forced merger of Ku-ring-gai and Hornsby Councils.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Szatow, Councillors , McDonald, Malicki, Armstrong and Berlioz

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Pettett, Anderson, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

The above Resolution was CARRIED as a Foreshadowed Motion to the LOST Original Motion. The LOST Original Motion was:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ossip/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

That the above Notice of Rescission as printed be adopted.

 

For the Resolution:                Councillors Pettett, Anderson, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         The Mayor, Councillor Szatow, Councillors McDonald, Malicki, Armstrong and Berlioz

 

No decision was taken in respect of the above matter as

the Motion when put to the vote was LOST.

 

During debate on the above item a Motion was moved by The Mayor Councillor Szatow and Councillor Berlioz that Councillor Anderson had committed an Act of Disorder and be excluded from the meeting.

 

For the Motion:                      The Mayor, Councillor Szatow, Councillors , Malicki and Berlioz

 

Against the Motion:                Councillors, McDonald, Pettett, Armstrong, Anderson, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

No decision was taken in respect of the above matter as

the Motion when put to the vote was LOST.

 

 

Councillor Citer returned

Councillor Fornari-Orsmond withdrew during discussion

Councillor Fornari-Orsmond returned

Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion

Councillor Ossip returned

Councillor Armstrong withdrew during discussion

Councillor Armstrong returned

 

85

Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Draft Operational Plan 2016 -2017

 

File: FY00382/8

Vide: GB.1

 

 

To place Council's revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and draft Operational Plan 2016-2017, incorporating the Budget, Capital Works Program, Statement of Revenue Policy and Fees and Charges for 2016-2017, on public exhibition.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/McDonald)

 

A.      That the revised Delivery Program  2013-2017 and draft Operational Plan 2016-2017, incorporating the Budget, the updated Capital Works Program, Statement of Revenue Policy and Fees and Charges, be endorsed and placed on public exhibition for a period of twenty-eight (28) days.

 

B.      That following public exhibition, a further report is submitted to Council to consider any submissions and to adopt the revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and draft Operational Plan 2016-2017.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

86

Fight on the Beaches Christmas in July Charity Ball

 

File: CY00043/8

Vide: GB.3

 

 

To inform Councillors of an invitation from Fight on the Beaches to attend a Christmas in July Charity Ball which will be held on Friday 8 July 2016 at Miramare Gardens, Terry Hills.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/McDonald)

 

That Councillors notify staff should they wish to purchase tickets to the 2016 Fight on the Beaches Christmas in July Charity Ball as per our charitable policy.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

The above Resolution was CARRIED as an Amendment to the Original Motion.  The Original Motion was:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Malicki)

 

That Council do not accept the invitation to purchase tickets to the 2016 Fight on the Beaches Christmas in July Charity Ball.

 

 

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

 

87

Pathway between Killeaton Street and Myrtle Place St Ives

 

File: 88/05627/01

Vide: QN.1

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor C Berlioz

 

An existing pathway between Killeaton Street and Myrtle Place St Ives is identified as a ‘Key Public Pedestrian Accessway’ in the St Ives Town Centre Public Domain Plan 2010 (Fig. 2A. 2-4).

 

Why is no funding allocated for enhancement, and by enhancement I mean formalisation of this pathway in the Capital Works Programme or the Operations and Delivery Program?

 

Answered by Acting Director Strategy

 

The Acting Director Strategy advised she would take the question on notice.

 

 

 

Council resolved itself into Closed Meeting
with the Press and Public Excluded to deal with the following item
after a Motion moved by Councillors
Cr Anderson and Cr Armstrong and

was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

88

Merger Proposal - Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council

 

File: S10664

Vide: C.1

 

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(g), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(g) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

 

This matter is classified confidential under section 10A(2)(g) because it contains advice concerning a legal matter that:

 

(a)        is a substantial issue relating to a matter in which the Council is involved

(b)        is clearly identified in the advice, and

(c)        is fully discussed in that advice.

 

It is not in the public interest to release details of the legal advice as it would prejudice Council’s position in court proceedings.

 

Report by Director Corporate dated 26 April 2016

 

Councillor Citer departed prior to voting on this matter

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Armstrong)

 

A.             That Council receive and note the report.

 

B.       That the General Manager be authorised to make the Delegate’s report and this confidential report to Council available to the public once future legal advice is obtained (and distributed to Councillors) supporting the release.  

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Council resolved to return to Open Council
after a Motion moved by Councillors Malicki and Fornari-Orsmond
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

The General Manager adverted to the consideration of the matter referred to in the Minute numbered 88, and to the resolution contained in such Minute.

 

The General Manager advised that Councillor Citer having been present for most of the discussion, ultimately declared the following interest:

 

A significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in respect to item C.1 Merger Proposal – Hornsby Shire Council (part) and Ku-ring-gai Council.

 

On 22 February 2016 Cr Citer was elected Vice President of the Hornsby State Electorate and believed that his election to this position has affected his ability to vote impartially on the item.

 

and subsequently departed from the Chamber prior to voting on the matter.

 

The Meeting closed at 11.13 pm

 

The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 26 April 2016 (Pages 1 - 54) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 10 May 2016.

 

 

 

          __________________________                                 __________________________

                   General Manager                                                         Mayor / Chairperson

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

PT.1 / 52

 

 

Item PT.1

S02542/16

 

28 April 2016

 

 

Petition

 

 

Petition - Objection to Proposed Construction of Rural Fire Service Station at Koola Avenue Killara (Fourteen [14] Signatures)

 

“We the undersigned wish to protest against the proposed construction of a Rural Fire Service Station on the Car Park adjacent to the shops in Koola Avenue, Killara. The parking area has recently been saved from being included in the release of 3 blocks of land including this parking area, which had been planned by Council for residential development.

 

Having successfully had that plan rejected we were told that the parking area was now dedicated and safe from any development and this area is so badly needed for the all day and part day parking of the business proprietors and their staff and visiting professionals and tradesmen attending to the shops.

 

We suggest that should a RFS Station be necessary in Killara be necessary and needed, then a site adjacent to the Scout Hall in Koola Avenue, well away from the shops or a site adjacent to this small car park on land owned by Council.

 

Please listen to the many objections to this unexpected and unnecessary proposal.’

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

GB.1 / 53

 

 

Item GB.1

S06788/4

 

28 April 2016

 

 

Review of the Local Government Rating System - Submission to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART)

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council on IPART’s review of the rating system for local government in NSW and to seek Council’s endorsement of a submission to IPART.

 

 

background:

The rating system review follows the Independent Local Government Review Panel’s report (Revitalising Local Government, October 2013) which made a number of recommendations to reform the local government sector, including a recommendation that IPART undertake a review of the rating system.

 

 

comments:

The NSW Premier has requested IPART to undertake a review to identify and make recommendations for potential reforms to the rating system for local government in NSW. As part of the review process IPART has released an Issues Paper for its “Review of the Local Government Rating System” on 13 April. IPART is now seeking feedback from councils, ratepayers, the community and other stakeholders on matters raised in the Issues Paper.

A public hearing on the Issues Paper was held on 26 April 2016 and Council has prepared a draft submission which is due by 13 May 2016.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council delegate to the General Manager the authority to finalise and lodge its submission on the “Review of the Local Government Rating System” Issues Paper.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To advise Council on IPART’s review of the rating system for local government in NSW and to seek Council’s endorsement of a submission to IPART.

 

Background

 

The rating system review follows the Independent Local Government Review Panel’s report - Revitalising Local Government, October 2013 (The Panel) which made a number of recommendations to reform the local government sector, including a recommendation that IPART undertake a review of the rating system.

 

In December 2015 the NSW Premier engaged IPART to conduct a review of the Local Government rating system in NSW pursuant to section 9 of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992 and in accordance with the terms of reference provided by the NSW Premier.

As per the NSW Premier “The implementation of an efficient and equitable rating system is a key component of the Government Fit for the Future reforms, and will ensure all councils are able to implement sustainable fiscal policies and reforms over the longer-term”.

 

The terms of reference asked IPART to:

 

·     Review the current rating system and recommend reforms that aim to enhance the ability  of councils to implement sustainable and equitable fiscal policies; and

 

·     Provide the legislative and regulatory approach to achieve the Government’s policy of freezing existing rate paths for four years for newly merged councils.

 

Comments

 

IPART released an Issues Paper as part of the review process on 13 April 2016. A public hearing on the Issues Paper was held on 26 April 2016.

 

The Issues Paper seeks feedback from councils, the community, and other institutions on the rating system and a range of possible changes to the way rates are levied across and within different communities. All stakeholders and interested parties are required to lodge submissions in response to the Issues Paper by 13 May 2016.

An Interim Report will be provided by IPART to the Minister for Local Government in June 2016. This report will outline options for achieving the rate path freeze for merging Councils. A Draft report on all issues will be publicly released in August 2016 and a Final Report will be provided to the Minister for Local Government in December 2016.

Highlights of the Issues Paper

The Issues paper outlines how IPART proposes to approach the rating system review, explains how stakeholders can provide input, and discusses the issues on which IPART particularly seeks comment.  The Issues Paper is attached to this report as Attachment A1.

 

The Issues Paper outlines a two task approach to IPART’s review:

 

·     Review the performance of the current rating system  and potential improvements

 

1.    Current rating system in NSW  - outlines the current rating structures, rating categories, treatment of high-density properties, rate peg and special variation processes, land valuation process, infrastructure and services funded by rates.

 

2.    Principles of taxation that should be employed in assessing and recommending changes to the current rating system – IPART identifies and discusses the tax principles proposed to be used in assessing the rating system, such as efficiency, equity, simplicity and competitive neutrality.

 

3.    Assess the Current method for setting rates - this section analyses the current method for setting the rates applicable to particular property owners. The elements that are discussed are the valuation methods used to set ad valorem amounts, the use of base and minimum amounts and rating categories.

 

4.    Assess exemptions, concessions and rebates – this section analyses the current method to determine who pays rates including the exemption from rates, based on land type or use and the concession on rates available to pensioners.

 

·     Recommend appropriate approach to achieve the rate path freeze policy

 

The NSW Government announced a policy of freezing the existing rate paths for four years for all Councils that merge as part of the Fit for the Future process.

 

1.    Freezing existing rate paths for newly merged Councils – the section outlines IPART’s interpretation of the freeze policy and how it affects each element of the rating system for newly merged Councils.  It further discusses the implications for new special variations and impact on taxpayers, including consideration of rating structures and rating categories.

 

2.   Establishing new, equitable rates after the 4 year period

After the 4 year freeze period, merged Councils will have to set a single uniform rate across the whole post – merger area. IPART discusses in more details the issues that may arise as a result of equalisation of rates for rate payers and analyses how these issues could be addressed. In doing so IPART is taking into account the NSW Government’s commitment to protect NSW residents against excessive rate rises.

 

Council’s submission to IPART

 

IPART identified issues throughout the Issues Paper that they would seek comments from stakeholders. For convenience IPART has provided a set of questions under each topic discussed above that they would like comment on. A template that will form part of Council’s submission has been developed to incorporate these questions, as well as Councils’ comments and responses and is attached to this report (Attachment A2 – Ku-ring-gai Council submission – Issues Paper “Review of Local Government Issues Paper”).

 

While draft comments to the Issues Paper are provided in the attachment, it is worthwhile highlighting some of the major issues that will impact the ratepayers as a result of the merger of Ku-ring-gai Council with Hornsby Shire Council in this report, as follows:

 

Assessing the current method for setting rates

 

Valuation method

    

Rates are based on land values. Different valuation methods are currently used across Australian jurisdictions:

 

·     Unimproved Land Value (UV) method – which values the property excluding the value of buildings, structures and other capital improvements. This valuation method is used in NSW and Queensland.

 

·     Capital Improvement value (CIV) method - which values the property based on the market value, or the value inclusive of all capital improvements.

 

·     Annual Rental Value (ARV) – method, which values the property based on its rental value.

 

For the purpose of valuation of properties, Councils in NSW are required to use the Unimproved Land Valuations provided by the NSW Valuer General. The Valuer General values all land in NSW.  

 

There are numerous arguments for retaining the UV or moving to CIV. Each of the valuation methods has both advantages and disadvantages for rating purposes compared to others and have different impacts for ratepayers. These arguments are discussed in detail in the Issue Paper (page 18, Issues Paper, IPART). 

 

Council comment: Council supports the argument for moving to Capital Improvement Value (CIV) for the purpose of property valuations.  The CIV is more easily understood by the public than other methods and is more equitable in terms of the ability to pay principle and the benefits principle. Under the CIV system there is an assessment of the total improved value of the property, so the wealth of the owner is more transparent and applying different levels of charging on a capacity to pay basis is more easily achieved. However all local government areas are different and  due to the extra complexity and cost in administering Capital Improved Valuations compared to Unimproved Value, Councils should be given the option of which valuation method they choose to use.

 

In regards to who should be used to provide property valuation services, the State Government is in the process of mandating the use of the Auditor General for external audit and removing the option to use private audit firms.  In this context it would seem odd at this point in time to open up the Valuer General’s services to private firms.  In order to ensure consistency in valuations and limit the scope for challenge and disputes with ratepayers, it is recommended that the Valuer General continue as the provider of valuation services.

 

Rate pegging and special rates

 

The rate peg is determined by the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART)

each year and sets the maximum general income NSW councils can collect. If Councils wish to increase their revenue by more than the rate peg they need to consult with their communities before applying to IPART for a special variation.

 

The Panel Report concludes that “the rate pegging system in its present form impacts adversely on sound financial management “. (Panel Report p.42). The Panel developed three options to respond to the issues of rate pegging:

 

·     Rate benchmarking( the Panel’s preferred option) – linked to improved Council’s Delivery Programs & revenue policies;

·     Streamlining rate pegging – the application and approval process for special variations;

·     Earned exemption – where certain councils demonstrating consistent high performance in asset and financial management are able to earn complete exemption from rate pegging.

 

IPART in their Issues Paper is seeking comments on what changes could be made to the current rate pegging to improve the rating system and better streamline the special variation process.

 

Council comment: Consistent with the Panel’s review Council believes that the “earned exemption” would be the preferred option without the need for IPART approval. This means:

 

·     Amending the LG Act to enable the Minister to exempt from rate-pegging individual councils that have demonstrated a consistently high level of fiscal responsibility and sound financial management in accordance with IPR Guidelines.

·     Where a random audit by IPART shows that councils has failed to meet the new criteria for Delivery Program and /or Special variations or concerns about council’s financial management are raised, the Minister may re-introduce the rate-pegging arrangements.

(The Panel report p.45)

 

Freezing existing rate paths for newly merged Councils

 

The NSW Government announced a policy of freezing the existing rate paths for four years for all Councils that merge as part of the Fit for the Future process. The rates path freeze policy means that in 4 years after the merger rates will continue to be set in each pre-merger council area so that the rate path in that area follows the same trajectory as if the merger had not occurred.

 

Council comment: Council supports the freeze path for rates to the extent that it would defer the increase in rates for the former Ku-ring-gai area due to its higher land values compared to Hornsby. This will provide the ratepayers with temporary certainty about their rates and relieve the ratepayers from an excessive increase in the rates for the first four years after the merger.

 

Special Rate Variation

 

Under the proposed 4 year rates path freeze policy a merged council will not be able to apply for new special rate variations during this period or apply for a continuation of an expired levy. However, IPART proposes to permit Councils to apply for the new special variation in limited circumstances such as:

−    For Crown Land added to the rating base

−    To recover amounts that are ‘above the cap’ on development contributions set under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

−    To fund new infrastructure projects by levying a special rate

 

Council comment: Council agrees with the proposed circumstances for allowing new special variations and also proposes that Councils be allowed to apply for special variations in other circumstances where there is community support for a special levy.

In particular, and to avoid possibly unintended consequences, the continuation of special variations that expire within the four year rate path freeze period should be permissible subject to community support.  Ku-ring-gai Council has a current 10 year Environmental Levy which will expire in 2018/19.  Under the rates path freeze, it could not be renewed until 2020/21, a highly detrimental outcome for the environment and a significant impact on relevant staff who would lose their employment.

 

Establishing new equitable rates after the 4 year freeze:  Rates equalisation

 

After the 4 year rates freeze path Councils will be required to set new rates across the whole area of the new Council.

 

As Council rates are based on land values, a merger of two council areas would result in changes to the amount of rates paid by individual properties. As the Local Government Act only allows for one ordinary residential rate across the whole of an urban council area, the status quo could not remain and a single residential rate covering the amalgamated council area would need to be implemented (rate equalisation).

 

The Local Government Act provides that residential subcategories can only be split according to whether it is rural residential or land in a centre of population, as follows:

 

s.529(2)  A sub-category may be determined:

s.529(2)(b) for the category “residential”— according to whether the land is rural residential land or is within a centre of population.

 

As per the section 529(2) Councils must set a single residential rate within a centre of population after the rate path freeze expires.

 

IPART in their Issues Paper identifies that rate equalisation may cause excessive rate changes for ratepayers. (Issues Paper page 46) . It goes to state that

 

The requirement to equalise residential rates within a centre of population could expose some Sydney residential ratepayers to large rate increases following the expiry of the rate path freeze.

 

IPART are providing some options to address the issue of rates equalisation:

 

·     Remove the rate equalisation requirement from the LG Act

·     Allowing merged Councils to gradually equalise rates after the rate freeze expires, and

·     Using other potential changes to the rating system to offset the impact of rate equalisation.

 

Council comment: Council’s view is that the current LG Act should incorporate changes to better enable a merged council to establish a new equitable and fair rating system. In its submission Council proposes that the current restriction on residential categorisation that allows only one category within a centre of population should be removed, assisting in the rates equalisation process across Councils. By removing the requirement to set the same residential rate within a centre of population, the merged Council would be able to set different residential rates within the new area and reduce the excessive rate increases for ratepayers. There are wide variations in land value within local government areas which results in large disparities in the rates paid which do not relate to the benefits received.  This will become more pronounced should the mergers proposed by the State Government proceed. 

 

Other rating issues and Council’s responses to such issues as rating categories, base and minimum rates, management of overdue rates, exemptions, concessions and rebates, are addressed in more details in the Submission attached which will form part of Council’s submission to IPART.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership and Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

A shared long-term vision for Ku-ring-gai underpins strategic collaboration, policy development and community engagement.

 

Council's responses to government policy and reforms are guided by and aligned with the adopted Community Strategic Plan 'Our Community Our Future 2030'. 

 

Analyse and provide appropriate submissions to government proposals affecting the local government industry.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

The NSW Premier has requested IPART to undertake a review to identify and make recommendations for potential reforms to the rating system for local government in NSW. Council has until 13 May 2016 to lodge a submission to IPART.

 

Risk Management

 

The Issues Paper includes consideration of the four year rates path freeze proposed if mergers proceed, which would reduce the risk of large rates increases during this transition period.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Financial sustainability would be enhanced by the introduction of the Capital Improvement Valuation methodology, which values properties based on the market value, or the value inclusive of all capital improvements, rather than the unimproved land value. This would broaden the rating tax base.

 

Social Considerations

 

Equity is established as a principle of taxation in the IPART Issues Paper.  This includes consideration of the benefits people receive and their ability to pay.

 

 

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable

 

Community Consultation

 

Not applicable

 

Internal Consultation

 

The draft submission was provided for internal comment.

 

Summary

The NSW Premier has requested IPART to undertake a review to identify and make recommendations for potential reforms to the rating system for local government in NSW. As part of the review process IPART has released an Issues Paper for its “Review of the Local Government Rating System” on 13 April. IPART is now seeking feedback from councils, ratepayers, the community and other stakeholders on matters raised in the Issues Paper.

A public hearing on the review of the rating system was held on 26 April 2016 and Council has prepared a draft submission which is due by 13 May 2016.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council delegate to the General Manager the authority to finalise and lodge its submission on the “Review of the Local Government Rating System” Issues Paper.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Angela Apostol

Manager Finance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Issues Paper - Review of Local Government Rating System - April 2016

 

2016/112431

 

A2

Ku-ring-gai Council Submission on Issues Paper Review of LG Rating System

 

2016/113655

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Issues Paper - Review of Local Government Rating System - April 2016

 

Item No: GB.1

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 


 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Ku-ring-gai Council Submission on Issues Paper Review of LG Rating System

 

Item No: GB.1

 


 


 


 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

GB.2 / 138

 

 

Item GB.2

S02046/9

 

2 May 2016

 

 

Local Government and Shires Association Board of Directors Election - Nomination of Voting Delegates

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To inform Council about the upcoming election for the Local Government and Shires Association (LGNSW) Board of Directors and determine which Councillors will be nominated to act as Ku-ring-gai’s voting delegates.

 

 

background:

Following an election inquiry concerning the election of members of the Board at the Association’s 2015 Annual Conference, the Federal Court of Australia made an order on 29 March 2016 declaring the election of 13 persons on the Board void and each such person not to have been elected. The offices of President and Treasurer were unaffected, and the Court determined that three other directors were not impacted by the irregularity because of the size of their respective primary votes.

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) has directed the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) to conduct an election for the vacant positions by secret postal ballot.

 

 

comments:

Each ordinary member must nominate its voting delegate(s) for the postal ballot by 12 noon on 2 June 2016. Ku-ring-gai Council is entitled to nominate seven (7) voting delegates.

Nominations must include the full name and postal address (including street address or PO Box number, suburb, state and postcode) for each voting delegate and indicate whether the address for each voting delegate is a workplace address.

Nominations are to be made online.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council determines its seven (7) voting delegates for the 2016 LGNSW Board Elections.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To inform Council about the upcoming election for the Local Government and Shires Association (LGNSW) Board of Directors and determine which Councillors will be nominated to act as Ku-ring-gai’s voting delegates.

 

 

Background

Following an election inquiry concerning the election of members of the Board at the Association’s 2015 Annual Conference, the Federal Court of Australia made an order on 29 March 2016 declaring the election of 13 persons on the Board void and each such person not to have been elected. The offices of President and Treasurer were unaffected, and the Court determined that three other directors were not impacted by the irregularity because of the size of their respective primary votes.

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) has directed the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) to conduct an election for the vacant positions by secret postal ballot.

 

The vacant positions are:

·     Vice President (Metropolitan/Urban council)

·     Vice President (Regional/Rural council)

·     Five (5) Directors (Metropolitan/Urban council)

·     Six (6) Directors (Regional/Rural council)

 

The only candidates eligible for these positions are those who stood for them in 2015. A nomination for election may be withdrawn by a candidate, provided that notice of withdrawal in writing is received by the Returning Officer no later than seven (7) days before the holding of the ballot.

 

Comments

 

Each ordinary member of the Local and Shire Association of New South Wales must nominate its voting delegate(s) for the postal ballot by 12 noon on 2 June 2016. No changes to voting delegates will be accepted after this time.

 

Nominations must include the full name and postal address (including street address or PO Box number, suburb, state and postcode) for each voting delegate and indicate whether the address for each voting delegate is a workplace address.

 

The formula for calculating the number of voting delegates is provided for in Rule 23 of the

Association's Rules. Ku-ring-gai Council is entitled to seven (7) voting delegates.

 

Nominations for voting delegates are to be made online.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership and Governance

 

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

Council’s responses to government policy and reforms are guided by and aligned with the adopted Community Strategic plan ‘Our Community Our Future 2030’.

 

The organisation responds flexibly, proactively and equitably to challenges and opportunities arising from government policy changes and reforms.

 

Analyse and provide appropriate submission to government proposals affecting the local government industry.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

As an ordinary member of the Local and Shire Association of New South Wales, Council must nominate its seven (7) voting delegate(s) for the postal ballot by 12 noon on 2 June 2016. In accordance with rule 37(b) of the Association’s rules, delegates must be Councillors.

 

Risk Management

 

Nil.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Social Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Summary

 

Following an election inquiry concerning the election of members of the Board at the Association’s 2015 Annual Conference, the Federal Court of Australia made an order on 29 March 2016 declaring the election of 13 persons on the Board void and each such person not to have been elected. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) has directed the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) to conduct an election for the vacant positions by secret postal ballot.

 

Ku-ring-gai Council is entitled to seven (7) voting delegates in the election. Council must nominate its voting delegate(s) for the postal ballot by 12 noon on 2 June 2016.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council determines its seven (7) voting delegates for the 2016 LGNSW Board Elections.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amber Moloney

Manager Records and Governance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Local Government and Shires Association - Election of Board of Directors

 

2016/102226

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Local Government and Shires Association - Election of Board of Directors

 

Item No: GB.2

 


 

 


 


 


 


 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

GB.3 / 148

 

 

Item GB.3

DA0160/15

 

13 August 2015

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

DA0160/15 - 35 Millewa Street, Wahroonga - Construction of 4 townhouses and associated site and landscaping works

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.3

 

 

Application No:

DA0160/15

Property Details:

35 Millewa Avenue, Wahroonga

Lot & DP No: Lot 81 DP 2666        

Site area (m2):    1025m2

Zoning:        R4 High density residential 

Ward:

Wahroonga

Proposal/Purpose:

Construction of 4 townhouses and associated site and landscaping works

Type of Consent:

Local

Applicant:

Urbanesque Planning Pty Ltd

Owner:

James Mackenzie

Date Lodged:

7 May 2015

Recommendation:

Approval

 

 

  

 


Purpose of Report

 

The purpose of the report is to determine an application for the construction of 4 townhouses and associated site works at the subject site. The matter is reported to Council as the proposal is for a development comprising three or more dwellings that is recommended for approval.

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

PLACES, SPACES & INFASTRUCTURE

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai

 

Applications are assessed in accordance with State and local plans

 

Assessments are of high quality, accurate and consider all relevant legislative requirements

 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Issues:                                                  Minimum street frontage and site area

 

Submissions:                                         Five (5) submissions received

 

Land & Environment Court:                           N/A

 

Recommendation:                                  Approval

 

History

 

Site

 

The site has an ongoing use as a residential property. It is noted that the site was ‘isolated’ as a consequence of the approval of DA0626/11 at 31-33 Millewa Avenue, Wahroonga. The proposal before Council responds to the isolation of the site.

 

Pre-DA

 

A Pre-DA consultation was held between Council officers and representatives of the owner, including the architect and property consultant. No significant issues were identified during the consultation.

 

 

 

DA History

 

7 May 2015 – application lodged

 

22 May 2015 – 22 June 2015 – application notified

 

2 July 2015 – preliminary planning assessment letter issued

 

21 December 2015– amended plans submitted to Council

 

31 March 2016 – further amended plans submitted to Council

 

The Site

 

Site description

 

The site subject of the proposed development is a rhombus shaped allotment that is 1025m2 in area. It has a frontage of 19.075m to Millewa Avenue. The site currently contains a single cottage that is in a dilapidated state. The site also contains a number of trees, none of which are remnant vegetation or significant landscape specimens. The site has a pronounced fall to the rear in excess of 2.5m.

 

Surrounding development

 

Surrounding development consists of high density multi-unit residential developments commensurate with the areas R4 zoning. Adjoining the site to the east and west are residential flat developments to 5 storeys  whilst directly to the north is a townhouse development that is consistent with the scale and density of the proposed development.

 

The Proposal

 

The development proposes:

 

·     construction of 4 x 2 storey townhouses, 3 containing 4 bedrooms and 1 containing 2 bedrooms

·     carparking for 6 vehicles and associated driveway works

·     extensive landscaping works including fencing

·     site stormwater drainage which extends through 12 Woniora Avenue at the rear


 

 

Consultation

 

Community

 

The application was advertised and notified to surrounding residents for a period of 30 days (22 May 2015 to 22 June 2015), as required by Part 26 of the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan 2015. During the notification period, submissions from the following were received.

 

1.       Ikuo & Yoko Toril – 104/37-41 Millewa Avenue, Wahroonga

2.       Jessica Gunawan – jessica@farnsworthshepard.com.au

3.       Sydney Water – PO Box 399 Parramatta NSW 2124

4.       Amanda Smith – 70a Haberry Street, Crows Nest

5.       D & J Hart – 2/12 Woniora Avenue, Wahroonga

 

The submissions raised the following issues:

 

As the proposed development is within proximity to a Sydney Water asset it is requested that prior to construction a condition be imposed requiring that the plans be endorsed by Sydney Water

 

Condition 27 is recommended requiring the development plans be considered by Sydney Water prior to the commencement of works.

 

We reside in an adjoining residential flat building at 37-41 Millewa Avenue and benefit from a treed outlook over 35 Millewa Street. In the event that trees are removed to accommodate the development we would request substantial plantings to offset their removal

 

The tree loss associated with the development has been considered by Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer. This loss is to be mitigated through new canopy tree plantings at the front and area of the site.

 

Having regard to the Clause 4.6 variations lodged in respect of frontage and site area, we consider the site is unsuitable for the proposed development, particularly as it will impact upon the privacy of our adjoining unit within the residential flat building at 37-41 Millewa Avenue

 

The subject site is a residual, isolated allotment created as a consequence of failed attempts to incorporate it into adjoining sites that have been developed for residential flat buildings. For the reasons discussed elsewhere in this report, the applicant’s variation request made pursuant of Clause 4.6 is acceptable and supported.

 

The windows of Unit 3 (particularly at the first floor) orientated towards our unit creating significant privacy and amenity issues for the eastern side of the residential flat development at 37-41 Millewa Avenue

 

The proposed development is assessed as having an acceptable impact upon the privacy of adjoining development as it exceeds the applicable building separation requirements. Further, the first floor windows referred to are to bedrooms, which are low use rooms.

 

No detail has been provided as to howthe construction of the pipe within the existing drainage easement will be undertaken

 

It has been confirmed that a pipe will be ‘thrust bored’ down the easement from the development site into the Council’s trunk system in Woniora Avenue.

 

Running a pipe through 12 Woniora Avenue does not make sense, rather the stormwater should connect into the system associated with 14-18 Woniora Avenue

 

The development site has the benefit of a drainage easement over 12 Woniora Avenue and irrespective of the suggested alternate route, the development may legally drain through that site.

 

Within Council

 

Landscaping:

 

The application was referred to Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer. The following comments were provided:

 

Impacts on significant existing trees –Clause 5.9, KLEP; Cl 1.3 Volume C Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP 2013

 

An Arboricultural Assessment, prepared by Landscape Matrix and dated 4 May 2015, has been submitted with the application. Tree numbers refer to this report.

 

Tree removal

The application proposes the removal of 12 trees of moderate to low retention value and the following trees of high retention value:

 

Tree 12/ Pittosporum undulatum (Sweet Pittosporum) This tree is located on the eastern boundary.  The proposed building will result in a major encroachment within the tree protection zone. There is no landscape objection to the removal of this tree.

 

Trees 17, 18 and 19/ Citharexylum spinosum (Fiddlewood) This row of trees is located on the eastern boundary. There is no landscape objection to the removal of these trees.

 

Street trees to be removed

There are no street trees to be removed.

 

Trees to be retained

Tree 4/ Stenocarpus sinuatus (Firewheel Tree) This tree is located at the south-eastern corner of the site within the front setback of the adjoining site. The impacts are considered acceptable.

 

Tree 20/ Dracaena sp. This tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site within the adjoining property. The proposed stormwater line is located within the structural root zone of this tree. To preserve the health and condition of this tree, the stormwater line is to be relocated closer to the building in accordance with arborist’s recommendation (Condition 16).

 

Tree 21/ Camellia japonica (Japanese Camellia) This tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site within the adjoining property. The proposed stormwater line is located within the structural root zone of this tree. To preserve the health and condition of this tree, the stormwater lines are to be relocated closer to the building in accordance with arborist’s recommendation (Condition 16).

 

Street trees to be retained

There are no adverse impacts on existing street trees.

 

Deep soil landscaping –Cl 6A.5 Volume A Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP

The minimum deep soil landscaping requirement for these properties is:

30% of the site area where parking is at grade.

 

Site area 1025.6m2

Numerical compliance 30% (307.7m2) is achieved

Proposed total deep soil area 32.5% (333m2) – compliance is achieved

 

 

Private open space counted as deep soil landscape area (Control 6 Cl 6A.5 Volume A Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP)

Only one-third of the proposed deep soil area within the private open space is to be included in the deep soil calculation. The requirement is not considered necessary due to the density and scale of the development subject to overall compliant deep soil landscape area.

 

Tree replenishment - Cl 6A.5 Volume A Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP

The site should support a minimum 3 trees that can attain 13 metres in height. The proposal provides in excess of this number of trees.

 

Private Open SpaceCl 6C.2 Volume A Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP

To ensure sufficient space for deep soil planting within the adjoining common areas, the private open space is to be consistent with the controls. The proposed private courtyard provides an 8m setback to the street boundary and is consistent with the control. The proposed 3m from a side boundary and 4 metres from the rear boundary setbacks do not comply.  The requirement for common landscape areas to side and rear setback for the proposed development is not considered necessary due to the density and scale of the development, subject to compliant deep soil landscape area.

 

Screen planting –Cl 1.3 Volume C Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP

Northern boundary – Viburnum odoritissima (Sweet Viburnum) 2m, Syzigium ‘Pinnacle’ 6m.  The syzigium has a mature height of 6-10m and in good soils can grow taller. This is considered undesirable in such close proximity to the dwellings and it would be preferable to replace it with a smaller cultivar. This has been addressed through Condition 16.

 

Western boundary – Viburnum odoritissima (Sweet Viburnum) 2m, Syzigium ‘Pinnacle’ 6m.  In excess of 30m of side boundary is restricted by the driveway and associated retaining wall for screen planting. The proposed stormwater line should be relocated by condition to be closer to the dwellings or deleted to provide adequate unencumbered deep soil along the side boundary for screen planting (Condition 16).

 

Eastern boundary –Ceratopetalum gummiferum (NSW Christmas Bush) 2m,  Syzigium ‘Pinnacle’ 6m.  The proposed stormwater line is recommended to be relocated by Condition 16 to be closer to the dwellings to provide adequate unencumbered deep soil along the side boundary for screen planting.

 

BASIX

The BASIX certificate reflects the landscape plan.

 

Stormwater plan

The proposed stormwater line is recommended to be relocated by Condition 16 to be closer to the dwellings to provide adequate unencumbered deep soil along the side boundary for screen planting.

 

Engineering:

 

The application was referred to Council’s Development Engineer. The following comments were provided:

 

          Stormwater:    

 

The subject site generally falls from the front of the property to the rear by approximately 3m. The site has access to a drainage easement at the rear draining to Council’s public stormwater system in Woniora Avenue. The easement is of maximum width only 1 metre with narrower sections adjacent to the buildings. The easement was created in 2002.

 

The applicant’s design engineer has submitted a longitudinal section of the proposed 225mm diameter pipe which is to be constructed along the eastern side property boundary of 12 Woniora Avenue and then runs parallel to the stormwater pipe within the existing easement towards Council’s existing drainage system. The pipe capacity would satisfy the requirements of Part 25R.6 of the Ku-ring-gai DCP.

 

In regard to the placement depth of the proposed pipe, the project arborist recommends thrust boring so that Council can be sure that buildings and vegetation within 12 Woniora Avenue including any trees in 10 Woniora Avenue will be protected.

 

The stormwater plans show an on-site detention tank of 19.7m3 located under the driveway area (between attached dwellings). The sizing of the detention tank is satisfactory with the overflow conveyed to the drainage easement.

 

A BASIX Certificate has been submitted, with the water commitments requiring individual water tanks of minimum 1,500L for each townhouse and to be configured to collect runoff from at least 60 square metres of roof area. Re-use will be for toilet flushing, laundry use and for irrigation.

 

The rainwater retention and re-use has met the BASIX commitments and satisfied the 50% reduction in runoff days required under the Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 25B.3-4. The applicant has provided 4,500L below ground rainwater tanks for each dwelling which is well in excess of the BASIX requirements.

 

Water quality measures using MUSIC Modelling have been implemented into the design. The applicant has provided a proprietary pollution chamber Stormwater360 ‘StormFilter’ located upstream from the OSD tank prior to connection into Council’s public drainage system. The stormwater treatment standards / targets outlined in Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 25B.6 would be achieved by the proposed treatment system.

 

Vehicular access and accommodation arrangements

 

The site is zoned ‘R4’ under the Ku-ring-gai LEP 2015. The parking provisions have been determined using Ku-ring-gai Council Local Centres Development Control Plan for multi-dwelling housing. The site is located greater than 400m walking distance from the Wahroonga Railway Station (approx. 450m according to the SEE). The parking provisions of Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 23R.2 ‘Car Parking Rates’ have been adopted:

 

3 x 4 bedrooms = 3 x 1.5 spaces/unit = 4.5 spaces

1 x 2 bedrooms = 1 x 1.25 spaces/unit = 1.25

4 dwellings - visitor space/4 dwellings = 1 visitor spaces

Total parking spaces required = 7 spaces

 

The development seeks to provide 6 off-street parking spaces, comprising 4 lock-up garages (including 1 accessible space) and 1 visitor spaces. The proposed variation to the minimum car parking requirements is discussed below (p.33, 6B.2 – car parking provision).

 

The adaptable parking space width of 4.8m can be modified to comply with the 2.4m plus 2.4m shared area to comply with AS2890.6.

 

The visitor space has not been made adaptable. The Planning Consultant states that the space is not compliant because the parking space is governed by the driveway gradient, which is incorrect. Whilst the access consultant has not specified which Australian Standard they rely on, the visitor space however can be widened to 3.8m to comply with AS4299-1995 ‘Adaptable Housing’ Clause 3.7.1 ‘Car Parking’. This has been addressed through Condition 25.

 

A temporary service /car wash space is not warranted for a small development of 4 units.

 

Vehicular access to the car parking facility is to be provided via a new 4.8m wide entry / exit driveway crossing which narrows to 3m internally. The access point also provides adequate sightlines for oncoming vehicles and to pedestrians on footpaths. The driveway clear width satisfies the requirements of Part 23.2 of the Ku-ring-gai DCP.

 

Construction management

 

Based on the scale of works and expected construction vehicle movements, a detailed construction traffic management plan (CTMP) must be submitted for review by Council’s Engineers prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

A Works Zone will be required along the Millewa Avenue frontage, and Condition 9 is recommended to that effect, including the need for approval by Council’s Traffic Committee and the payment of the necessary fees. 

 

The application has been referred to Roads and Maritime Services, due to the site location on a collector road and RMS has raised no objection to the proposal.

 

Waste collection

 

Consistent with the requirements of   Clause 24.4 (9) of the KDCP 2015, internal waste collection is not required since the number of units is less than 6. The garbage bins are to be placed along the street frontage for Council’s garbage bin pickup.

 

Impacts on Council infrastructure

 

The developer will be required to construct a new footpath along the frontage to match the footpath of No.37 Millewa. Detailed design drawings for these works will be assessed by Council’s Operations Section for approval under the Roads Act.  A final occupation certificate may not be issued until the works are completed to the satisfaction of Council.

 

Condition 23 specifies that concurrence from Telstra is required given that there is a Telstra pit located within the proposed location of the driveway crossover.

 

Statutory Provisions

 

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979

 

The proposal is “Local Development” under Part 4 of the EP&A Act, 1979 and requires development consent.

 

The provisions of Section 79C(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) determine the matters for consideration in assessing a development application as stated below:

 

(a)      The provisions of:

(i)          any environmental planning instrument, and

(ii)         any proposed instrument that is or has been the subject of public consultation under this Act and that has been notified to the consent authority (unless the Director General has notified the consent authority that the making of the proposed instrument has been deferred indefinitely or has not been approved), and

(iii)        any development control plan; and

(iv)        any planning agreement that has been entered into under section 93F, or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under section 93F, and

(v)         the regulations (to the extent that they prescribe matters for the purposes of this paragraph), and

(vi)        any coastal zone management plan (within the meaning of the Coastal Protection Act 1979), that apply to the land to which the development application relates.

(b)      the likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality,

(c)      the suitability of the site for the development,

(d)      any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the regulations,

(e)      the public interest.

 

The relevant provisions of environmental planning instruments, draft instruments, DCPs, regulations and policies are addressed in the following sections of this report. The likely impacts, suitability of the site and public interest are also addressed below and the submissions received have previously been addressed. The application is not subject of any planning agreement.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 - Remediation of Land

 

The provisions of SEPP 55 require consideration of the potential for a site to be contaminated.  

 

In accordance with SEPP 55 (clause 7), the consent authority must not grant consent on land unless,

(a)  it has considered whether the land is contaminated, and

(b)  if the land is contaminated, it is satisfied that the land is suitable in its contaminated state (or will be suitable, after remediation) for the purpose for which the development is proposed to be carried out, and

(c)  if the land requires remediation to be made suitable for the purpose for which the development is proposed to be carried out, it is satisfied that the land will be remediated before the land is used for that purpose.

The development site is currently occupied by single residential dwelling, with this use occupying the site since the late 1920’s. Given this low density residential occupation, the likelihood of soil contamination low and with regard to the considerations prompted by SEPP 55, the subject site is assessed as being satisfactory with regard to the proposed development.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (infrastructure) 2007

 

The site subject of the proposed development is adjacent to the Northern rail corridor. As a result, the proposed development triggers considerations of Cl. 86 and 87 of the SEPP. In this regard, the following comments are made:

 

Clause 86      Excavation in, above or adjacent to rail corridors

 

(1)      This clause applies to development (other than development to which clause 88 applies) that involves the penetration of ground to a depth of at least 2m below ground level (existing on land):

 

(a)         within or above a rail corridor, or

(b)         within 25m (measured horizontally) of a rail corridor, or

(c)         within 25m (measured horizontally) of the ground directly above an underground rail corridor.

 

(2)      Before determining a development application for development to which this clause applies, the consent authority must:

 

(a)         within 7 days after the application is made, give written notice of the application to the chief executive officer of the rail authority for the rail corridor, and

(b)         take into consideration:

 

(i)           any response to the notice that is received within 21 days after the notice is given, and

 

(ii)          any guidelines issued by the Director-General for the purposes of this clause and published in the Gazette.

 

(3)      Subject to subclause (4), the consent authority must not grant consent to development to which this clause applies without concurrence of the chief executive officer of the rail authority for the rail corridor to which the development application relates, unless the rail authority is the ARTC…….

 

Clause 87      Impact of rail noise or vibration on non-rail development

 

(1)      This clause applies to development for any of the following purposes that is on land in or adjacent to a rail corridor and that the consent authority considered is likely to be adversely affected by rail noise or vibration:

 

(a)         a building for residential use,

(b)         a place of public worship,

(c)         a hospital,

(d)         an educational establishment or child care centre.

 

(2)      Before determining a development application for development to which this clause applies, the consent authority must take into consideration any guidelines that are issued by the Director-General for the purposes of the clause and published in the Gazette.

 

(3)      If the development is for the purposes of a building for residential use, the consent authority must not grant consent to the development unless it is satisfied that appropriate measures will be taken to ensure that the following LAeq levels are not exceeded:

 

(a)     in any bedroom in the building – 35dB(A) at any time between 10.00pm and 7.00am,

(b)     anywhere else in the building (other than a garage, kitchen, bathroom or hallway) – 40dB(A) at any time…….

 

As required by Clause 86, Council referred the application to Sydney Trains on 18 May 2015. Sydney Trains issued concurrence to the development on 3 June 2015, subject to Conditions relating to acoustics, vibration and electrolysis from stray currents (Condition 34).

 

In response to Clause 87, the applicant has submitted an acoustic report, detailing the necessary level of construction and inclusions to achieve the stipulated noise criteria.

 

To ensure noise levels are contained, acoustic treatment is necessary to the building structure, as well as acoustic treatment and seals to the buildings windows.

 

Furthermore, Sydney Trains requires further investigation with regard to acoustics and this has been incorporated into Condition 34.

 

The development is assessed as being satisfactory with regard to the considerations under Clause 87 of the SEPP.

 

Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 - Hawkesbury-Nepean River

 

SREP 20 applies to land within the catchment of the Hawkesbury Nepean River.  The general aim of the plan is to ensure that development and future land uses within the catchment are considered in a regional context. The Plan includes strategies for the assessment of development in relation to water quality and quantity, scenic quality, aquaculture, recreation and tourism.

 

The proposed development is considered to achieve the relevant aims under this policy.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

A valid BASIX Certificate has been submitted.

 

Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015

 

Part 1:Preliminary

 

Clause 1.2: Aims of plan

 

(a)      to guide the future development of land and the management of environmental, social, economic, heritage and cultural resources within Ku-ring-gai,

(b)      to protect, enhance and sustainably manage the biodiversity, natural ecosystems, scenic values, water resources and ecological processes within the catchments of Ku-ring-gai for the benefit of current and future generations,

(c)      to maintain and improve water quality within the catchments of Ku-ring-gai,

(d)      to facilitate adaptation to climate change,

(e)      to manage risks to the community and the environment in areas subject to natural hazards and risks,

(f)      to recognize, protect and conserve Ku-ring-gai’s indigenous and non-indigenous cultural heritage,

(g) t   o ensure that development does not conflict with the hierarchy of commercial centres in Ku-ring-gai,

(h)      to encourage a diversity of employment within Ku-ring-gai,

(i)       to encourage a variety of housing types within Ku-ring-gai,

(j)       to achieve land use relationships that promote the efficient use of infrastructure,

(k)      to facilitate good management of public assets and promote opportunities for social, cultural and community activities,

(l)       to facilitate development that complements and enhances amenity for residential uses and public spaces.

 

The proposed development has been considered against the Aims set out under this clause of KLEP 215. For the reasons outlined within this report, the proposed development is acceptable in all relevant respects.

 

Part 2: Permitted or permissible development

 

The site is located within the ‘R4 High Density Residential’ zoning.

 

The objectives of the R4 High Density Residential zone are as follows:

 

•        to provide for the housing needs of the community within a high density

residential environment.

•        to provide a variety of housing types within a high density residential

environment.

•       to enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

•        to provide for high density residential housing close to public transport,

services and employment opportunities.

 

The proposed development for multi dwelling housing, consisting of townhouses, is permissible with consent within the ‘R4 High Density Residential’ zoning. Additionally, for the reasons outlined within this report, the proposed development satisfies the objectives set out for this zone.

 

Part 4: Principal development standards

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Site area: 1,025.4 m2

Cl. 4.3 Height of buildings  17.5m (max)

8m

YES

Cl. 4.4 FSR  0.8:1

0.76:1

YES

 

Part 5: Additional local provisions

 

Clause 6.6: Site requirements for multi dwelling housing and residential flat buildings

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Cl. 6.6 Site area  1,200m² (min)

1025.4m²

NO

Cl. 6.6 Street frontage 

Site area <1,800m² = 24m (min)

19.07m

NO

 

Clause 4.6 of KLEP provides flexibility in applying certain development standards to particular development and in particular circumstances on the following grounds:

 

 “(3)   Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard by demonstrating:

 

(a)      that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable

or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and

 

(b)      that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard.

 

(4)      Development consent must not be granted for development that

contravenes a development standard unless:

 

(a)      the consent authority is satisfied that:

 

(i)       the applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be demonstrated by subclause (3), and

 

(ii)      the proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out, and

 

(b)        the concurrence of the Director-General has been obtained.”

 

The applicant has submitted a Clause 4.6 variation request that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard pertaining to the minimum street frontage and site area development standards set out in clause 6.6. This is assessed as follows:

 

whether compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case

 

The following are extracts from the applicant’s Clause 4.6 variation request:

 

There is jurisdictional guidance available on how variations under Clause 4.6 of the Standard Instrument should be assessed in Samadi v Council of the City of Sydney [2014] NSWLEC 1199.

Paragraph 27 of the judgement states:-

 

Clause 4.6 of LEP 2013 imposes four preconditions on the Court in exercising the power to grant consent to the proposed development. The first precondition (and not necessarily in the order in cl 4.6) requires the Court to be satisfied that the proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the zone (cl 4.6(4)(a)(ii)). The second precondition requires the Court to be satisfied that the proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the standard in question (cl 4.6(4)(a)(ii)). The third precondition requires the Court to consider a written request that demonstrates that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case and with the Court finding that the matters required to be demonstrated have been adequately addressed (cl 4.6(3)(a) and cl 4.6(4)(a)(i)). The fourth precondition requires the Court to consider a written request that demonstrates that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard and with the Court finding that the matters required to be demonstrated have been adequately addressed (cl 4.6(3)(b) and cl 4.6(4)(a)(i)).

 

Precondition 1 - Consistency with zone objectives

 

The land is located in the R4 – High Density Residential zone. The objectives of the R4 zone are

 

·     To provide for the housing needs of the community within a high density residential environment.

·     To provide a variety of housing types within a high density residential environment.

·     To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

·     To provide for high density residential housing close to public transport, services and employment opportunities.

 

The resultant development will be for four townhouses. The site may be developed as proposed with consistency with the zone objectives. The development will satisfy the zone objectives for the following reasons:-

 

·     The development will provide for the housing needs of the community in a higher density residential environment. The proposed development cannot achieve the full extent of the underlying floor space ratio of 0.8:1 but achieves a ratio of 0.76:1. This is higher than single residential development and reflects the highest and best use of the available site area combined with a two storey built form. There is no excess height bulk or scale associated with the proposal so the site cannot be said to be overdeveloped.

·     The development will provide townhouse style residential accommodation in a high density residential zone. This provides housing choice and satisfies the second objective.

·     The third objectives is not relevant to the proposal as it is not for a non-residential use.

·     The proposal satisfies the fourth objective as it provides higher density housing close to public transport (Wahroonga Railway Station) with connectivity to nearby employment centres such as Hornsby, Chatswood and the city.

 

Precondition 2 - Consistency with the objectives of the standard

 

The customary and accepted approach to sustaining variations to development standards is to assess the proposed variance against the relevant objectives of the particular development standard. In this case the objective of the site requirements for multi dwelling housing and residential flat buildings are articulated at Clause 6.6(1) of the KLEP as follows:-

 

(a) to provide site requirements for development for the purposes of multi dwelling housing and residential flat buildings so as to provide for the orderly and economic development of residential land while maintaining the local character, and

(b) to ensure that lot sizes and dimensions of medium and high density residential sites allow for generous landscaped areas and setbacks to ensure the amenity of adjoining properties and to support the desired future character of these areas.

 

Considering the terms of the stated objective, we say in support of the variance:-

·     The site is an isolated site surrounded on both sides by large residential flat developments.

·     The proposal for multi dwelling housing consisting of four townhouses is considered an ideal use of the isolated site as an intermediary density between of the surrounding residential flat developments and the existing single dwelling within the R4 High Density Residential zone.

 

·     The application is in compliance with, and considerably under, the planned residential density.

·     The planned residential density is 0.8:1 while the proposal has a density of 0.76:1.

·     The application demonstrates compliance with the height of buildings development standard which is the only other development standard applicable to the development. The proposed height is only just over half of the permissible height for the site.

·     The bulk and scale of the development is therefore satisfactory, acceptable and supportable.

·     The development is compliant with the DCP controls for deep soil landscaping.

·     The application demonstrates that the land can support a multi dwelling housing development that has acceptable internal and external amenity impacts and will make a positive aesthetic contribution to the streetscape, including a thoroughly landscaped area along the street frontage setback.

·     The site is demonstrated through the above factors to be of a sufficient size to accommodate the development.

 

For these reasons I conclude that the development meets the objectives of the standard and achieves a meritorious environmental planning outcome.

 

Precondition 3 - To a consider written request that demonstrates that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case

 

Compliance with the development standards for area and site width is not physically possible as the site cannot be expanded or combined with adjoining sites which are already fully developed. Having regard to the merits of the application and the demonstrated capability of the site to support a multi dwelling housing proposal as designed (with satisfactory environmental planning outcomes) it would be unreasonable to refuse the granting of consent to the application.

 

The development will sit comfortably between the two adjoining sites which support large residential flat buildings and will represent appropriate infill development.

As the proposed development can be achieved as demonstrated and the site circumstances are unique and very particular to the site, it is reasonable to apply flexibility and vary the standard.

 

For the above reasons strict compliance is unreasonable and unnecessary.

 

Precondition 4 – To consider a written request that demonstrates that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard and with the Court [or consent authority] finding that the matters required to be demonstrated have been adequately addressed

 

The primary issue in this development application is whether there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to allow the variation to the development standards.

In this regard I note the following comments which are similar to comments previously made:-

 

·     The site will be underdeveloped in terms of floor space ratio and building height. These development standards are complied with. Bulk and scale are not at issue.

·     The site is unique in that it is an isolated site created through the independent development of the two adjoining sites at 31 and 37 Millewa Avenue. Those developments were approved in the knowledge that an isolated site would be created.

·     The site is eminently suited to some form of higher density residential development such as the proposed townhouses. They provide housing choice in a soft landscaped environment in close proximity to public transport and employment.

·     The size and shape of the site render it unsuitable for development as a residential flat building due to its relatively narrow width and less than compliant site area. Therefore a better planning outcome is achieved by allowing the development of the site with a multi dwelling housing development as proposed.

 

For the above reasons, it is considered there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify a variation of the development standard for floor space ratio.

 

In the recent ‘Four2Five’ judgement (Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90), Pearson C outlined in her judgement that a Clause 4.6 variation requires identification of grounds that are particular to the circumstances to the proposed development. That is to say that simply meeting the objectives of the development standard is insufficient justification of a Clause 4.6 variation.

 

Whether there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard

 

In addition to the comments above, the applicant seeks to justify the departures on the following environmental planning grounds:

 

·     The site is unique in that it is an isolated site zoned R4 created through the redevelopment of the two adjoining sites for residential flat buildings.

·     This has necessitated a different design approach for the development of the site. The most suitable built form is considered to be a townhouse typology. This will have the benefit of a higher density development within a high density environment but maintaining a high proportion of landscaped area resulting in a desirable planning outcome for the site.

·     The land being developed is therefore distinctive in its characteristics of size and shape and eminently suited to some form of development. In this case the proposal is for four townhouses.

·     The variations to the site area and site width are inconsequential as a merit assessment of the development reveals that the site may achieve a supportable proposal that has appropriate bulk, scale, aesthetic presentation and landscaped area. The size and width of the allotment can readily accept the form of development proposed and achieve a satisfactory and supportable streetscape outcome.

 

The above are the environmental planning grounds which are the circumstance which are particular to the development which merit a variation to the development standard.

 

The interaction of the site configuration with design excellence combine to produce a meritorious development despite the numerical variation to the site area and site width.

 

It is considered that the points raised above constitute sufficient environmental planning grounds upon which the development standards maybe varied. Crucially, the development proposed relates to an isolated allotment that associates a zoning which allows for a higher a better use than that of its presents land use as a single dwelling. To not accept the environmental planning grounds put forward would sterilise the site which is contrary to the objects of the Act.

 

Whether the proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out

 

The objectives of the R4 High Density Residential zoning are as follows:

 

·     to provide for the housing needs of the community within a high density

·     residential environment.

·     to provide a variety of housing types within a high density residential

·     environment.

·     to enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

·     to provide for high density residential housing close to public transport,

·     services and employment opportunities.

 

The proposal provides a housing type that is consistent with the character of the locality and provides a transition between the existing low and higher density forms of development prevalent in the area.  Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the objectives of the zone and also, as previously discussed, with the objectives of the minimum street frontage and site area development standard. The variation to the standards will not unduly compromise the way in which the land can be developed and is considered to maintain the public benefit, particularly given its history as an isolated site. Moreover, the density of the development is not excessive and the development is of a scale that is commensurate with its site / frontage width.

 

The concurrence of the Director-General has been obtained

 

Planning Circular PS08-003 issued 9 May 2008 states:

 

Notification of assumed concurrence of the Director-General under clause 4.6(4) (and the former clause 24(4)) of the Standard Instrument

 

(1)        Under clause 64 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, council is notified that it may assume the Director-General’s concurrence for exceptions to development standards, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), in respect of all applications made under:

(a)        clause 4.6 (or the former clause 24, or any future amended version of this clause) of the Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006, or

 

(b)        any other clause that is based on a substantially similar format and has a substantially similar effect to the clause described in (1)(a),

where such a clause is adopted in an environmental planning instrument to provide for exceptions to development standards.

 

Accordingly, concurrence is assumed as clause 4.6 of the Standard Instrument has been incorporated into the KLEP 2015.

 

In conclusion, the request to vary the development standard pertaining to street frontage and minimum site area is acceptable.

 

Part 6:     Other matters

 

Clause 6.2 – Earthworks

 

The proposed development is assessed as satisfying the objectives and prescribed controls relating to earthworks. It is noted that the proposal only involves minimal earthworks including site grading and excavation for services.

 

Clause 6.5 – Stormwater and water sensitive design

 

The proposed development is assessed as satisfying the objectives and prescribed controls relating to stormwater and water sensitive design. As detailed elsewhere in this report, the proposal incorporates the necessary stormwater capture and treatment measures prescribed by the DCP.

 

POLICY PROVISIONS

 

Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan 2015

 

Part 2: Site analysis

 

A site analysis which identifies the existing characteristics of the site and the surrounding area has been provided. The site analysis is considered to satisfy the objectives of this part of the DCP.

 

COMPLIANCE TABLE

Development control

Proposed

Complies

Part 6 Multi Dwelling Housing Controls

Part 6A Site Design

6A.1  Site layout

Site layout to respond to site analysis

 

Site analysis provided

YES

Any dwelling with a frontage to the street must address the street 

 

Town house 1

 

YES

 

Minimum of one dwelling to address the street

 

Town house 1

YES

Minimise hard surface to maximise landscaping

 

Hard surface kept to minimum

YES

Long straight driveways will not be permitted. Buildings and fences to be staggered

 

No long straight driveway proposed and building and fences are staggered

 

YES

Provide single pedestrian entry from street level

 

 

 

NO

 

Layout to be based on figure 6A.1-2

 

Site layout reflects the recommended layout

 

YES

6A.2 Building setbacks

10m from primary street boundary (min)

10m

YES

Parallel to prevailing building line

Parallel to building line

YES

3m side setback from any side boundary (min)

 

2m minimum to western side boundary

NO

Driveways set back 3m from side boundary (min) to allow for deep soil planting

 

Proposed driveway is setback 0.5m from the side (eastern) boundary -

NO

Setback areas not be used for at grade parking

No at grade parking in setback areas

YES

 

6m rear setback (min)

 

4.027m

NO

 

Ground floor private terraces/courtyards must have:

8m setback from street boundary (min)

3m setback from side boundary (min)

4m setback from rear boundary (min)

 

 

 

Front courtyard behind setbacks

Courtyard for unit 2 encroaches

Courtyard for units 3&4 encroach

 

 

YES

NO

NO

 

Ground floor side setback encroachment by private terraces/courtyards only if deep soil planting requirements are met.

 

Deep soil planting requirements are met

YES

 

15% (max) of the total area of any street setback is to be occupied by private terraces/courtyards.

No private terraces/courtyards proposed to street setback

 

 

YES

 

 

 

6A.3 Building separation

The minimum separation between residential buildings on the development site and the adjoining sites must comply with the following:

 

Up to 2nd Storey:

i)   3m between non habitable rooms

ii)  6m between rooms/balconies in all other cases

 

 

 

 

 

 

6m

6m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YES

YES

 

6A.4 Site coverage

Town houses with at grade car parking – 35%

 

34%

YES

6A.5 Deep soil landscaping

Multi-unit dwelling development must have deep soil landscaping of 30% (min)

31%

YES

Lots with the following sizes are to support a minimum number of tall trees capable of attaining a mature height of 13m on shale transitional soil or 10m on sandstone derived soils:

 

1200m2 or less: 1 per 400m2 of site area

1201-1800m2 : 1 per 350m2 of site area

1801m2 or more: 1 per 300m2 of site area

 

The site area is 1,025.4m² and therefore 1 tall tree per 300m² is required. This equates to 3 trees.

There are 6 tall trees proposed to be planted.

YES

At least 50% of all tree plantings are to be locally occurring trees and spread around the site.

 

>50%

YES

Part 6B Access and Parking

6B.1 Vehicle Access

Driveway located 3m (min) from side boundary and separated by a continuous landscaped verge & screen planting

 

0.5m setback to the eastern boundary. Landscaping scheme has been adequately progressed to provide for suitable landscaping transition between subject site and adjoining residential flat development

NO

One driveway (max)

 

Only one driveway is proposed

YES

Driveway designed to avoid straight, long gun barrel appearance by use of landscaping and variations in alignment

 

Driveway design avoids long gun barrel appearance

YES

On-site vehicle turning areas designed to permit turning in a single reversing movement

 

Vehicle turning areas allow turning in a single reversing movement

YES

On-site vehicle turning areas must be located within the basement or concealed from the view of the public domain

 

Turning areas provided within driveway area

YES

If provided in basement, waste and recycling room to be 2.6m ceiling height (min) along path of travel from street to residential waste collection and manoeuvring area and kept free of overhead ducts, services and other obstructions

 

N/A

N/A

6B.2 Car parking provision

Basement car parking must be consolidated under building footprint

 

N/A

YES

The basement car park must not project more than 1m above existing ground level to the floor level of the storey immediately above

 

N/A

N/A

Wherever possible, direct access must be provided from basement car parks to entry

 

N/A

N/A

Car parking spaces, circulation areas, roadways and ramps are to comply with AS2890.1

 

Council’s Senior Development Engineer is satisfied that compliance is achieved

YES

Car parking rates:

(Volume C Part 2R.2)

 

1 bedroom unit: 1 space

2 bedroom unit: min. multiple of 1.25  spaces per unit

3 bedroom unit: min. multiple of 1.5 spaces per unit

 

 

 

 

 

1 x 1.25 = 1.25

 

3 x 1.5 = 4.5

 

Total required: 5.75 (6)

Total provided: 5

 

 

 

NO

Visitor parking: 1 space per 4 units

 

1 space to be adaptable by complying with dimensional and locational requirements of AS2890.6.

 

One space to be provided with tap to make provision for on-site car washing

 

1 visitor spaces

 

Council’s Senior Development Engineer is satisfied that compliance is achieved

 

Car wash space is provided

YES

 

YES

 

 

 

YES

Clearly signposted space for temporary parking of service and removalist vehicles with min. dimension of 3.5m x 6m and min. manoeuvring area 7m wide (where not provided, one of visitor spaces may be used if it meets these dimensions)

 

Temporary service/car wash space provided which satisfies minimum dimensions. Condition to be imposed to ensure clear signage of the space.

YES

 

Part 6C. Building Design and Sustainability

6C.1 Communal open space

Communal open space must be provided where more than 10 dwellings are proposed that do not address the street

 

Proposal is for less than 10 dwellings

N/A

6C.2 Private open space

Multi-dwelling housing development must provide a minimum (internal dimension) 35m² of private open space per dwelling at ground floor, and must ensure:

 

i)   a single space of  minimum 25m² with a minimum internal dimension of 4m and direct access from a living area of the dwelling; and

ii)  the remaining spaces must have a minimum internal dimension of 2m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All dwellings >35sqm, with a minimum of 25sqm at 4m dimension

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YES

 

 

 

 

 

Primary private open space is to have direct access from the main living areas

 

All primary private open space areas have direct access from main living area

YES

Private open space (outdoor) for ground floor dwellings is to be differentiated from common areas by:

 

i)   Change in level and/or:

ii)  screen planting such as hedges or shrubs and/or;

iii) fence/wall to max height of 1.8m.  Any solid wall component to have max 1.2m height with 30% transparent component on top.  Gate to be provided from common area

 

 

YES

6C.3 Solar access 

Dwellings must receive min 3 hours direct sunlight to at least one living room & primary private open space between 9am - 3pm on 21st June

 

Minimum of 3 hours provided to a living room and primary open space between 9am – 3pm midwinter

YES

 

Min. 3 hours between 9am – 3pm on 21st June to living areas and principal portion of private open space of existing residential flat buildings and multi-dwelling housing on adjoining lots and residential development in adjoining lower density zones

 

Minimum solar access provided to living areas and principal portion of open space of multi-dwelling housing on adjoining lots

YES

Overshadowing must not compromise the development potential of the adjoining under-developed site(s)

 

Adjoining sites are developed to their potential

YES

All development must utilise shading and glare control

 

Matter covered by BASIX

YES

6C.4 Natural ventilation

All habitable rooms are to have windows or doors that can be opened and closed

 

All habitable rooms have windows or doors that can be opened and closed

YES

All dwellings must have natural cross ventilation

 

All dwellings have natural cross ventilation

YES

At least 25% of all kitchens are to be immediately adjacent to an operable window

 

All of the kitchens immediately adjacent to an operable window

YES

All habitable rooms are to be naturally ventilated without relying solely on lightwells or skylights

 

All habitable rooms are naturally ventilated without relying solely on lightwells or skylights

YES

6C.5 Dwelling depth, width and room size

Maximum internal plan depth of a dwelling is to be 14m from glass line to glass line

 

Town houses 1 & 2: 13.5m

Town houses 3 & 4: 15.5m

 

YES

NO

 

Each dwelling must have 4m dimension (min)

 

All dwellings have 4m dimension

YES

Living areas must have 4m internal plan dimension (min)

 

All living areas have 4m internal plan dimension

YES

Multi-dwelling housing with two bedrooms must have a minimum internal plan dimension of 3m (excl. wardrobe space) in all bedrooms

 

All dwellings have two bedrooms which meet the necessary internal dimension requirements

YES

Multi-dwelling housing with three or more bedrooms are to have at least two bedrooms with a minimum internal plan dimension of 3m (excluding wardrobe space)

 

All dwellings have at least two bedrooms with a minimum internal plan dimension of 3m (excl wardrobes)

YES

Built in wardrobes are to be provided:

i)    to all studio apartments;

ii)   to all bedrooms in one and two bedroom apartments

iii)  to at least two bedrooms in apartments of three or more bedrooms

 

Built in wardrobes are provided to at least two bedrooms in dwellings

YES

6C.6 Dwelling mix

All multi-dwelling housing developments must contain at least one dwelling for each 10 dwellings (or part thereof) designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing Class C

Town house 1 is designed as adaptable housing

YES

6C.7 Building entries

The entry path is to be directly accessible and visible from the street

 

Entry paths are directly accessible and visible from street

 

YES

Building entry must be integrated with building facade design. At street level, the entry is to be articulated with awnings, porticos, recesses or projecting bays for clear identification

 

Building entries are articulated with canopies provided over entries for clear identification

YES

All entries must be well lit and designed to avoid any concealment or entrapment areas

 

Design satisfactory

YES

 

All light spill is prohibited

 

Light spill is controlled via condition in accordance with AS4284:1997

YES

6C.8 Building facades

Building length is not to exceed 36m

 

No section of building exceeds 36m in length

YES

All building facades must be modulated and articulated with wall planes varying in depth by not less than 0.3m.  Where external walls are longer than 12m, the building alignment must be stepped by a minimum 0.6m articulation (projection or indentation) in the façade.

 

The proposed building is sufficiently modulated and articulated in its facades

YES

Building facades must be designed to respond to solar access by using solar protection elements such as eaves and louvres as environmental controls

 

Design incorporates sufficient solar protection elements such as eaves and louvres

YES

All building elements including shading devices and awnings must be coordinated and integrated within the overall façade design

 

All shading devices and awnings coordinated and integrated within overall façade design

YES

Where individual air conditioning units are used, they must not be located on the building façade or on balconies or terraces

 

Air conditioning is not visible from the street

YES

Balconies that run the full length of the building façade are not permitted

 

Town house 1 has a small balcony facing the street

YES

 

Balconies must not project more than 1.2m from the outermost wall of the building façade

 

Town house 1 has a small balcony facing the street

YES

Blade walls are not to be the sole element used to provide articulation

 

Sufficient articulation and no overuse of blade walls

YES

6C.9 Top storey design and roof forms

Where a third storey is proposed, the gross floor area of the top storey must not exceed 60% of the gross floor area of the storey immediately below it

 

N/A

N/A

Where the third storey is not incorporated into the roof form, it must be set back from the outer wall of the floor below on all sides

 

N/A

N/A

Service elements must be integrated into the overall design of the roof so as not to be visible from the public domain or any surrounding development

 

Service elements are integrated into the overall design of the roof

YES

Roof design must respond to solar access by using eaves or skillion roofs

 

Design responds to solar access

YES

Roof forms  are to be modulated or broken

 

Modulated roof form

YES

Solar panels to be integrated into the roof line (where provided)

 

Solar panels are not proposed

YES

6C.10 Internal ceiling heights

Ceiling height for habitable room: 2.7m min

 

2.7m

YES

Ceiling height for non-habitable room: 2.25m min

 

2.7m

YES

6C.11 Visual privacy

Buildings must be designed to ensure privacy

 

Building designed to ensure privacy

YES

Continuous transparent balustrades are not permitted to balconies/terraces

 

N/A

N/A

Screening between dwellings must be integrated with the overall building design

 

Screening integrated into the overall building design

YES

Landscaped screening must be provided to adjoining sites

 

Landscaped screening is to be provided to adjoining sites

YES

6C.12 Storage

Storage space must be provided at the following minimum volumes:

10m³ for two bedroom dwellings

12m³ for dwellings with three or more bedrooms

 

>12m³ per unit

YES

50% of storage space to be provided within the dwelling.  Remaining storage located  outside the dwelling to be specifically allocated to the relevant dwellings

 

Storage provision complies

YES

6C.13 External air clothes drying facilities

Provide one external air clothes drying area for each dwelling

 

Sufficient space provided to private open space areas

YES

External air clothes drying area must be screened from public areas and common areas

 

Sufficient screening provided to private open space areas

YES

6C.14 Fencing

Front fences and walls (to public street) and side fences in the street setback must not be higher than:

i)    0.9m closed construction (masonry, lapped and capped timber or brushwood fences)

ii)   1.2m open style construction (open paling and picket fencing)

Closed front fences with a max height of 1.8m and set back 2m from the front boundary will be considered where the site fronts a busy road.

 

 

 

YES

Fences and walls must be stepped down and follow the natural contours of the site

 

Fences and walls are stepped to follow natural contours of site

YES

Hedges and shrub planting no higher than 1.2m along entire front boundary

 

No hedges and shrub planting over 1.2m proposed to entire front boundary

YES

All fences to highlight entrances, and be compatible with buildings, letterboxes and garbage storage areas

 

Fences highlight entrances and are compatible with building and structures

YES

External finishes must be robust and graffiti resistant

 

External finishes considered suitable

YES

PART 22 Site Design

22.1 Earthworks and Slope

Development must demonstrate consideration of site topography, drainage, soil landscapes, flora, fauna and bushfire hazard

Consideration of site topography has been provided

YES

Development must be accommodated within the natural slope of the land

Design accommodates the slope of the site

YES

Development is to minimise earthworks on steeply sloping sites

Sites with a slope in excess of 15% may require certification from a geotechnical engineer as to the stability of the slope in regards to the proposed design

<15% slope on site

N/A

Minimum 600mm width is required between retaining walls to provide adequate soil area and depth to ensure that they do not read as a single level change and for the viability of landscaping

Assessed  by Council’s Landscape Officer and found to be satisfactory

YES

Existing ground level is to be maintained for a distance of 2m from any boundary

Assessed  by Council’s Landscape Officer and found to be satisfactory

YES

Fill and excavation are not permitted within sensitive environments

N/A

N/A

Retaining walls, excavated and filled areas shall be located and constructed to have no adverse impact on:

i)   Structures to be retained on the site

ii)  Structures on adjacent public or private land

iii) Trees to be retained onsite or on adjoining sites

No adverse impact

YES

Excavated and filled areas are to be constructed so as not to redirect or concentrate stormwater or surface runoff onto adjoining properties

Assessed and found to be satisfactory

YES

Design of proposal must consider the impacts of altered subsurface/groundwater flows or direction on groundwater dependent ecosystems or species

Assessed and found to be satisfactory

YES

22.1 Landscape Design

Assessed by Council’s Senior Landscape Assessment Officer and found to be satisfactory

 

YES

PART 23 Access and Parking

23.1 Equitable Access

Applications are to demonstrate how access to and within the development meets the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA)

Application has provided an Access Report demonstrating that the application meets the requirements of the DDA

YES

23.2 Vehicle Access, 23.4 Visitor Parking, 23.5 Parking For People With A Disability, 23.6 Pedestrian Movement Within Car Parks, 23.7 Bicycle Parking  and Facilities

Assessed by Council’s Senior Development Engineer and found to be satisfactory

YES

PART 24 Building Design and Sustainability

24.3 Building Services

All applicants must consult with service providers

Standard consent conditions will ensure that this is undertaken

YES

Services and structures required by the providers are to be located within basements, or concealed within the façade, with appropriate access. 

Standard consent conditions will ensure that this is undertaken

YES

Air conditioning units located within basements must be screened and have adequate ventilation

Air conditioner plant room to be located within basement

YES

24.4 Waste Management

All waste and recycling facilities must comply with the BCA and all relevant Australian Standards

Waste receptacles stored within open space of each unit

N/A

All waste and recycle to be stored within site

Garbage collection from street due to size of development

YES

Access to collection point

Unimpeded access, suitable grade, exit forward direction and level surface, clear >2.6m clearance height

YES

Waste 2 x 240l per 2 units: 4

4 x 240l waste

YES

Co-mingled 1 x 240l per 4 units: 2

2 x 240l

YES

Recycling: 1 x 240l per 4 units: 2

2 x 240l

YES

24.5 Acoustic Privacy

Building to comply with separation requirements of DCP

Adequate design principles have been used and requirements of DCP satisfied

YES

24.6 Visual Privacy

Private open spaces and principle living spaces of the proposal and adjacent dwellings to be protected from direct or unreasonable overlooking

Proposal has been adequately designed to mitigate privacy impacts

YES

24.7  & 24.8 Materials, Finishes and Colours

Comprehensive details provided with application

Finishes/materials have been considered and assessed as being satisfactory and consistent with the character of the surrounding environment.

YES

24.10 Construction, Demolition and Disposal

Waste management plan provided with application

A waste management plan was submitted as part of the proposed development. It is considered that the construction waste management plan meets the underlying objectives of waste management as required under the DCP.

YES

PART 25 Water Management

Council’s Development Engineer has assessed the proposal against the relevant provisions of the DCP that relate to water management. The application is considered to be acceptable in this regard, subject to Condition 14.

 

6A.1 – site layout

 

Clause 6A.1(5) of the KDCP 2015 requires in a multi-unit housing development that a single entry pedestrian point is to be provided form the street. This access is to provide a clear pedestrian path to each of the units within a development, ensuring the legibility and identity of dwellings for residents and visitors.

 

Due to the narrow width of the development site and its above grade construction, only Unit 1 may be provided with a pedestrian path to the front door from the front boundary, with pedestrian access to the front door over the driveway being necessary for Units 2, 3 and 4 (or those at the rear of the site). As the development comprises only 4 units, traffic movements along the driveway will be infrequent and a conflict between pedestrians and vehicles unlikely. The situation is not dissimilar to that of three battle axe allotments that contain single dwellings being accessed off a single, shared right of way.

 

 As no plausible option exists to accommodate a path which is not to the detriment of the site’s landscaping or deep soil area, the departure from the control is acceptable on merit.

 

6A.2 – building setback

 

As discussed previously, the proposal departs from the minimum frontage widths prescribed for multi-unit housing within the KLEP 2015. This departure is acceptable, however it has a consequence of constraining the available building envelope when KDCP’s setbacks for multi-unit housing are applied.

 

The proposal seeks to depart from the minimum side and rear setbacks, as well as the setback requirements of a driveway to the side boundary.

 

Despite the numerical departures with the setback requirements of the DCP, the positioning of the development on the site is considered acceptable, when the context of the development is considered as well as its scale and density.

 

As the proposal is only 2 storeys in scale and is located between two 5 storey residential flat developments, the variation to the site setbacks is acceptable. It is noted that the established residential flat buildings have 6m side setbacks providing more than adequate building separation between them and the proposed development. The size of the development does not impact those buildings in terms of privacy, over shadowing or general amenity.

 

The rear of the site adjoins a townhouse development which is of a similar scale and built form to that proposed. That development (having a frontage to Woniora Avenue) has a rear setback to the common boundary of approximately 900mm. The proposed development has a minimum rear setback of 3m (that increases to 4m), varying the 6m requirement of the DCP. This setback area is mostly deep soil, with significant landscaping and, as such, its impact upon the adjoining townhouse development is minimal. Contextually, the rear setback is acceptable.

 

The driveway of the development is adjacent to the western boundary, with a 0.5m setback provided to that boundary. This allows for small shrub plantings and whilst inconsistent with the DCP is acceptable for the style of development, as a complying development would necessitate a basement car park which is not viable for this scale of development. The impact of the reduced setback is lessened as a consequence of the side setback of the adjoining residential flat building which is heavily landscaped.

 

The terraces or private open space areas of Units 2, 3 and 4 also encroach into the eastern side and northern rear setback, however this is considered acceptable on the basis of the constrained site area and that the courtyards exceed the minimum area requirements, allowing them to be heavily landscaped, consistent with the side and rear setback setting of a multi-unit housing development.

 

6B.2 – car parking provision

 

Clause 6B.2(10) of the KDCP 2015 establishes a minimum and maximum parking rate for multi-unit housing developments within 400m of a train station. At a minimum, 1 space per dwelling is necessary. For the 4 units proposed within the development and accounting for a visitor space required by Clause 6B.2(12), a minimum of 5 car parking spaces would be necessary whereas 6 are proposed.

 

Where a multi-unit housing development is more than 400m from a train station, car parking at a rate prescribed by Clause 23R.2 is to be provided, generating a requirement of 7 car spaces.

 

The development site is within a 400m radius of Wahroonga Train Station, however has a walking distance of approximately 450m.

 

Clause 6B.2(10) of the DCP does not define the scope of how the 400m distance to a railway station is to be calculated or applied. Traditionally, it has been applied as the walking distance from a development to a train station, however failure to reference this within the control could be construed as the calculable distance being the 400m radius around the train station. On the basis of the latter position, the development would comply with the minimum car parking requirements of the DCP.

 

It is prudent, however, to adopt the conservative approach to the control given the ambiguity,  in which case the proposed development seeks to depart from the minimum car parking requirements established by the DCP.

 

The applicant has put an argument to Council that in adopting the conservative car parking  requirements of the DCP, the car parking provided to the development is adequate for the demand to be generated by it, particularly when the proximity of the station and Wahroonga town centre are considered. As the development is only 4 units, it is considered that any additional demand for car parking beyond that provided for within the development can be accommodated within the surrounding street network, without any unacceptable impact on adjoining properties.

 

It is noted that additional car parking could be integrated into the development, however this would reduce deep soil landscaping. The small scale of the development and proximity to the Wahroonga train station is such that compliant deep soil landscaping is more desirable over strictly complying car parking.  

 

6C.5 – dwelling depth, width and room size

 

The upper storeys of Units 3 and 4 have an internal depth from glass line to glass line of 15.5m, which exceeds the maximum depth provision of 14m in Clause 6C.5(1) of the KDCP.

 

The departure from the control is however satisfactory as the ground floor depths comply with the maximum depth requirements. The ground floor is where the living areas of the units are to be located and receive adequate cross ventilation and solar access. At the first floor where the non-compliances are proposed the floor layout is generally limited to bedrooms and bathrooms that are well serviced with windows, providing more than adequate natural light and ventilation.

 

Section 94 Plan

 

In accordance with Council’s 2010 Contributions Plan, the proposed development attracts a S94 contribution of $55,052 (Condition 30).

 

Likely Impacts

 

The proposed development, subject to conditions, is assessed as having an acceptable impact upon the surrounding natural, social, economic and built environments.

 

Suitability of the Site

 

As demonstrated by this assessment, the site is suitable for the proposed development.

 

Public Interest

 

Approval of the application is in the public interest.

 

Conclusion

 

Having regard to the provisions of Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered satisfactory. Therefore, it is recommended that the application be approved.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

A.      THAT Council, as the consent authority, is satisfied that the request under Clause 4.6 of Ku-ring-gai LEP 2015 to vary the minimum street frontage and minimum site area development standards is well founded.  Council is also satisfied that the proposed development will be in the public interest and is consistent with the objectives of the development standard and the R4 High Density Residential zone.

 

AND

 

B.       THAT Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0160/15 for demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a multi-dwelling housing development comprising four townhouses, landscaping and associated site works on land at 35 Millewa Avenue, Wahroonga for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

Sheet 1 of 6 Issue E

A & N design Sydney

1.2.2016

Sheet 2 of 6 Issue E

A & N design Sydney

1.2.2016

Sheet 3 of 6 Issue E

A & N design Sydney

1.2.2016

Sheet 4 of 6 Issue E

A & N design Sydney

1.2.2016

C02.01 Issue F

Engineering Studio

1.3.2016

C02.02 Issue F

Engineering Studio

1.3.2016

C02.03 Issue F

Engineering Studio

1.3.2016

C02.04 Issue F

Engineering Studio

1.3.2016

C02.05 Issue F

Engineering Studio

1.3.2016

14-037 Issue C

Jocelyn Ramsay & Associates

7.12.2015

 

Document(s)

Dated

Colours and finishes schedule

07 May 2015

Report 150262R1 Revision 0 - prepared by Rodney Stevens Acoustics Consultants

14 September 2015

Disability access compliance statement - Cheung access

3 March 2016

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

3.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety

 

4.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

 

5.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·        Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, over the site frontage,         including the full intersection.

·        All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:         A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:    To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

 

7.     Dilapidation survey and report (private property)

 

Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Address

 

· 12 Woniora Avenue

 

 

The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.

 

In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.

 

Note: A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.

 

Reason:    To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.

 

8.     Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for the longest heavy rigid vehicle.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·      Demolition

·      Excavation

·      Concrete pour

·      Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·      Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users. 

 

When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:   To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

9.     Work zone

 

A works zone shall be provided along the site frontage. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.

 

If the work zone is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.

 

Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.

 

In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.

 

Reason:     To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.

 

 

10.   Sediment controls

 

Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.

 

The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.

 

Reason:    To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

 

11.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off or ground protection installed as per following Landscape Plan to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fencing/ground protection shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing’s and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing. Ground protection shall be in accordance with AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites.

 

Reason :  To protect existing trees during construction phase

 

 

12.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone.

 

·        This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing           environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·         Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report.

·        The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

·        The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for   further consultation with Council.

·        The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

 

13.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

 

14.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in KDCP 2015, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:         The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

15.   Amendments to approved landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

Landscape Plan Dwg No. 14-037 Issue C

Jocelyn Ramsay and Assoc

7/12/15

 

The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended as follows:

 

1. To preserve neighbour amenity, the proposed screen planting of Syzigium ‘Pinnacle’  along the northern boundary is to be substituted with a smaller cultivar such as Syzigium ‘Resiliance’  or Syzigium ‘Elegance’  .

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended are required by this condition.

 

Note:       An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscapedesigner shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:   To ensure adequate landscaping of the site

 

 

16.   Amendments to approved engineering plans

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

C02.01 Revision F

Engineering Studio

1/03/16

 

The above engineering plan(s) shall be amended as follows:

 

1.       To preserve the health and condition of Tree 21/ Camellia japonica (Japanese Camellia), the proposed stormwater line along the eastern boundary is to be relocated directly adjacent to the building in accordance with arborist recommendations.

 

Note:           An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

17.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

18.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

19.   Outdoor lighting

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Note:       Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.

 

20.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the  plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:      To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

21.   Adaptable units

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable unit within the development application, unit 1 is designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.

 

Note:         Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:    Disabled access & amenity.

 

22.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:         A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure the protection of trees.

 

 

23.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Note: Concurrence from Telstra is required given that there is a Telstra pit located within the proposed location of the driveway crossover.

 

 

Reason:     To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

 

24.   Car parking details

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:

 

·         all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades,           transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas     comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking”

·        the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans

·        the visitor space is to be made adaptable. The visitor space is to be widened to 3.8m    to comply with the relevant Australian Standards.

 

Reason:    To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

25.   Car parking allocation

 

Car parking within the development shall be allocated in the following way:

 

Resident car spaces

5

Visitor spaces

1

Total spaces

6

 

Each adaptable dwelling must be provided with car parking complying with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.

 

At least one visitor space shall also comply with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.

 

Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:     To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.

 

26.   Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in Millewa Avenue:

 

·         construct a new 1.2m wide footpath along the frontage to match the footpath of No.37 Millewa Avenue.

 

Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve.  The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.

 

The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works.  Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 - 1996 - Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads - Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.

 

A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.

 

27.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

28.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:     To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

29.   Infrastructure restorations fee

 

To ensure that damage to Council Property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

a)       All work or activity taken in furtherance of the development the subject of this approval must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council Property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

b)       The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this approval shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council Property, and for the removal from Council Property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

c)       The Infrastructure Restoration Fee must be paid to the Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

d)       In consideration of payment of the Infrastructure Restorations Fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council Property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by the Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure Restorations Fee payable pursuant to this condition.

 

e)       In this condition:

 

          “Council Property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

          “Infrastructure Restoration Fee” means the Infrastructure Restorations Fee calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council Property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:    To maintain public infrastructure.

 

30.   Section 94 Contributions - Centres.

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Infrastructure Type                                                                      Total

LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural                                                    $6,227.27

Wahroonga LC Local Parks & Sporting Facilities                                    $45,941.66

Wahroonga LC Local Roads Bus & Drainage Fac                                      $2,883.79

 

Development Contributions Total   $55,052.72

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:    To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

31.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:   Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

32.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·        The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building        Code of Australia

·        In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989      requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of      that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

 

33.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:         Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:    To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

34.   Sydney Trains conditions

 

i.      Noise and vibration

 

An acoustic assessment is to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate demonstrating how the proposed development will comply with the Department of Planning’s document titled ‘Development Near Rail Corridors and Busy Roads - Interim Guidelines’.

 

ii.     Stray currents and electrolysis from rail operations

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate the applicant is to engage an electrolysis expert to prepare a report on the electrolysis risk to the development from stray currents. The applicant must incorporate in the development all measures recommended in the report to control that risk. A copy of the report is to be provided to the Principal certifying Authority with the application for the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:   Statutory requirement.

 

35.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

36.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

37.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·         be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·         display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder,        Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·        be durable and weatherproof

·        display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·         be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety and public information.

 

 

38.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·         physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·         earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·        all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·        the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming   airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·         all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered      to prevent the escape of dust

·         all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·        gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·        cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:    To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

 

39.   Post-construction dilapidation report

 

The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:

 

·         compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report

·         have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.

 

A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.

 

Reason:    Management of records.

 

40.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:    To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

41.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:    To ensure public safety.

 

42.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

 

43.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:    To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

44.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·        are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·        are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·        are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·         refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·        are restricted to one such sign per property

·        do not exceed 2.5m2

·        are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

45.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:    To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

46.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:    Provision of utility services.

 

47.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

48.   Arborist’s report

 

The trees to be retained shall be inspected and monitored by an AQF Level 5 Arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the project arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work. All reports should include dated, a brief description of the trees inspected, and any mitigation works prescribed. An arborist report prepared by About Trees, dated 27/11/13, has been submitted as part of the application. Tree numbers refer to this report.

 

Schedule

Tree/location

Time of inspection

Tree 2/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox)located on the nature strip

All work within road reserve is to be supervised by the Project Arborist. 

Tree 4/ Stenocarpus sinuatus (Firewheel Tree) located at the south-eastern corner of the site within the front setback of the adjoining site

All work within the tree protection zone of this tree is to be supervised by the Project Arborist. 

Tree 20/ Dracaena sp. This tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site within the adjoining property

Hand excavation for stormwater line is to be supervised by the Project Arborist. 

Tree 21/ Camellia japonica (Japanese Camellia) This tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site within the adjoining property

Hand excavation for stormwater line is to be supervised by the Project Arborist. 

 

Reason:    To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

49.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

50.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation, excluding for basement, within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug. No tree roots of 50mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following, tree(s) shall be severed or injured in the process of any hand excavation.

 

Schedule

Tree/location

Radius from trunk

Tree 2/ Lophostemon confertus (Brushbox)located on the nature strip

6.2m

Tree 4/ Stenocarpus sinuatus (Firewheel Tree) located at the south-eastern corner of the site within the front setback of the adjoining site

3.7m

Tree 20/ Dracaena sp. This tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site within the adjoining property

15m

Tree 21/ Camellia japonica (Japanese Camellia) This tree is located on the eastern boundary of the site within the adjoining property

3m

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

51.   Thrust boring

 

Excavation for the installation of any services within 1 metre from the existing building structure within No.12 Woniora Avenue and the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise the thrust boring method.  Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:

 

 

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

All existing vegetation within the proposed drainage easement

As per arborist recommendation.

 

Reason:    To protect existing building structures and trees.

 

 

52.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

53.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

54.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:    To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

55.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·        Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the      material type, for disposal or processing.

·         This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:   To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

 

 

56.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 578399M_02 have been complied with.

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

57.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

58.   Completion of tree works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including transplanting and pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent. All monitoring reports shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.

 

59.   Accessibility

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

·        the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2

·        the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible

·         the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering       are raised

·         international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2

·        the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993

·         the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods

 

Reason:    Disabled access & services.

 

60.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 25R.9.2). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

61.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·         the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·         the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 25B.5 respectively, have been achieved

·        retained water is connected and available for use

·        all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·         components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and      the Building Code of Australia

·         all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

Note:         Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

 

62.   WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and above)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·         as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·         gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·         as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·         as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·         the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·         as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·         the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·         dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·         the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·         top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

63.   OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 25R.9.1). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

64.   Easement drainage line construction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the required interallotment drainage system has been installed and surveyed under the supervision of a designing engineer or equivalent professional.

 

Note:         At the completion of the interallotment works, the following must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval:

 

·         details from the supervising engineer that that the as-constructed works comply with the approved interallotment design documentation

·         a full works as executed drawing of the as built interallotment drainage line (dimensions, grades, materials, invert levels) prepared by a registered surveyor, and details from the  surveyor that all drainage structures are wholly contained within existing drainage easement(s)

 

Reason:    To protect the environment.

 

 

65.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:    Statutory requirement.

 

66.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:    To protect public infrastructure.

 

67.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all mechanical ventilation systems are installed in accordance with Part F4.5 of the Building Code of Australia and comply with Australian Standards AS1668.2 and AS3666 Microbial Control of Air Handling and Water Systems of Building.

 

Reason:    To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.

 

68.   Fire safety certificate

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.

 

Note:         A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:    To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

69.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:    To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

70.   Encroachment over burdens

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, no part of any structure shall encroach over any easement and no loadings shall be imposed to utilities within any easement unless approved by the owner(s) appurtenant to the burden.

 

This development consent does not set aside or affect in any way the exercise of any rights-at-law which may be conferred upon any parties by the existence and/or terms of the grant of any easements or rights-of-carriageway on or over the subject lot(s). It is the applicant’s full responsibility to ensure that any rights-at-law are investigated and upheld. Council accepts no responsibility whatsoever, at any time, for any claim for any matter or thing arising from its approval to this application involving any encroachment or other influence upon any easement or right-of-carriageway. 

 

The applicant’s attention is directed to the rights of persons benefited by any easement or right-of-carriageway concerning the entry and breaking up of a structure approved by this consent. In the event that such a structure causes damage, blockage or other thing requiring maintenance to infrastructure within the easement or right-of-carriageway, or access is required to carry out maintenance, Council accepts no responsibility in this regard.

 

Reason:    To ensure compliance with the development consent.

 

71.   Annual Fire Safety Statement

 

Each 12 months after the installation of essential fire or other safety measures, the owner of a building must cause the Council to be given an Annual Fire Safety Statement for the building. In addition a copy of the statement must be given to the NSW Fire Commissioner and a copy displayed prominently in the building.

 

Reason: To ensure statutory maintenance of essential fire safety measures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adam Richardson

Executive Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Richard Kinninmont

Team Leader - Development Assessment North

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Attachment A - Zoning Map

 

2016/095738

 

A2

Attachment B - Location Sketch

 

2016/095745

 

A3

Attachment C - Site Plan

 

2016/063216

 

A4

Attachment D - First Floor Plan

 

2016/063217

 

A5

Attachment E - Elevations

 

2016/063218

 

A6

Attachment F - Stormwater Plan

 

2016/063210

 

A7

Attachment G - Landscape Plan

 

2015/341055

 

A8

Attachment H - Clause 4.6 variation

 

2016/095519

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Attachment A - Zoning Map

 

Item No: GB.3

 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Attachment B - Location Sketch

 

Item No: GB.3

 


APPENDIX No: 3 - Attachment C - Site Plan

 

Item No: GB.3

 


APPENDIX No: 4 - Attachment D - First Floor Plan

 

Item No: GB.3

 


APPENDIX No: 5 - Attachment E - Elevations

 

Item No: GB.3

 


APPENDIX No: 6 - Attachment F - Stormwater Plan

 

Item No: GB.3

 


APPENDIX No: 7 - Attachment G - Landscape Plan

 

Item No: GB.3

 


APPENDIX No: 8 - Attachment H - Clause 4.6 variation

 

Item No: GB.3

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

GB.4 / 218

 

 

Item GB.4

S09972

 

26 April 2016

 

 

Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To report on the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study Draft Report public exhibition and seek Council’s endorsement of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report

 

 

background:

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study (Attachment A1) is the second detailed flood study to be undertaken by Ku-ring-gai Council, continuing to build on the preliminary study of flood risk in the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area (LGA) completed by Mott MacDonald Hughes Trueman in 2011.

This flood study is an essential step in the NSW Government’s floodplain risk management process, as per the NSW Floodplain Development Manual (2005).

In August 2014, consultants Jacobs were awarded the tender to undertake the flood study, primarily funded by the NSW Government through the 2013/2014 NSW Floodplain Management Program.

 

 

comments:

Extensive modelling and mapping was undertaken by Jacobs in order to prepare the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study, which defines the existing flood behaviour in the study area, the hazards posed to existing development and the capacity of the community to respond to a flood emergency.

In order to give the community an opportunity to review the study and provide feedback and comments prior to finalisation, the draft report was placed on public exhibition from 26 February 2016 – 29 March 2016.

Properties impacted by the Overland and Mainstream Flow Provisional Flood Planning Area map in the report were notified of the public exhibition by mail.

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study will be used to inform land use planning, flood mitigation measures, emergency management and drainage system upgrades.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council endorses the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report with minor amendments, as detailed in this report.

 


  

Purpose of Report

To report on the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study Draft Report public exhibition and seek Council’s endorsement of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report.   

 

 

Background

 

Council resolved at its meeting of 12 October 2010 to have a flood study carried out as part of the background studies guiding the preparation of the Ku-ring-gai Principal Local Environmental Plan (LEP). In 2011, consultants Mott MacDonald Hughes Trueman completed a preliminary study on flood risk for the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area (LGA), which also included a number of recommendations to ensure flood risk assessment, planning and management is undertaken in line with the NSW Floodplain Development Manual (2005).

 

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study (Attachment A1) is the second detailed flood study (after Blackbutt Creek) to be undertaken by Ku-ring-gai Council and builds on the preliminary study described above. This flood study is an essential step in the NSW Government’s floodplain risk management process, as per the NSW Floodplain Development Manual (2005).The majority of this flood study has been funded by the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH).

 

In August 2014, consultants Jacobs were awarded the tender to undertake the flood study and have been working with Council, OEH and the community to consolidate background information and develop models for the catchment, to aid in the preparation of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study.

 

The draft report was recently placed on public exhibition and reviewed based on comments from staff, the community and members of the Flood Risk Management Committee.

 

Comments

 

Extensive modelling and mapping was undertaken by Jacobs in order to prepare the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study, which defines the existing flood behaviour in the study area, the hazards posed to existing development and the capacity of the community to respond to a flood emergency.

 

Specifically, the study provides information on the history of flooding in the catchment; a review of available data; the hydrologic and hydraulic models used and developed for this study; the ground survey undertaken; the model review and calibration; the estimation of design floods; and the results of the mapping and analysis.

 

Due to the sensitive nature of this information it was important that the community, particularly those residents directly impacted, had an opportunity to review the draft study and provide feedback and comments prior to finalisation. As such the draft study was placed on public exhibition from 26 February 2016 – 29 March 2016. The community was notified of the public exhibition by:

 

·     Council’s corporate advertisement;

·     Council’s web page;

·     mailing letters (322) to residents and owners of properties that are impacted by the Overland and Mainstream Flow Provisional Flood Planning Area map; and

·     the flood study bulletin email update to residents on the Lovers Jump creek flood study email list

 

A number of enquiries were made during the public exhibition period and by the close of the exhibition five submissions had been made. The main issues raised through the submissions include:

 

·     concern over the impact on insurance premiums;

·     reports of previous flood damage; and

·     specific Council assets and areas of concern.

 

The matters identified along with the responses are summarised in the following table.

 

Submission Number

Submission Type

Response Type

Submission summary and comments

1

Website

Email Written

This submission demonstrated concern that the flood maps for an extreme event will affect insurance premiums and resale value

 

Comment: Insurance companies will use this information to refine premiums – this may be beneficial for some and may result in higher premiums for others. Further enquiries can be made to the Insurance Council of Australia (http://www.insurancecouncil.com.au/).

 

It is hard to determine how this will impact on land value – many buyers are already highly aware of flooding and these reports will give them more clearly defined information.

2

Letter and completion of survey

Email Written

This submission took the opportunity to submit a response to the original questionnaire detailing flooding issues at their property, particularly events from 2016.

 

Comment: There was not enough information to compare flood extents. However, the additional information appears to broadly agree with the modelled depths in that area, noting the model may show the flooding to be around 50mm shallower.

3

Website

Email Written

This submission draws attention to the road at the corner of Chilton Parade and Davidson Avenue which often floods after heavy rain and requested that Council is proactive and puts measures in place to reduce this problem.

 

Comment: Council has applied for funding to undertake the next stage of the flood risk management process – the flood risk management study and plan. This will identify the main areas of concern and appropriate solutions where required.

4

Letter

Written

This submission enquired as to what action, if any, Council will be proposing to undertake following the final report.

 

Comment: Council has applied for funding to undertake the next stage of the flood risk management process – the flood risk management study and plan. This will identify the main areas of concern and appropriate solutions where required.

 

This submission also reported that the sandstone channel through the site handles the storm flows well and hasn’t flooded.

 

Comment: The model does show the flow to be contained within the constructed channel through this part of the site.

 

This submission also noted that some sandstone boulders have become dislodged at the site and silting up is occurring which restricts flow, particularly during heavy rainfall. It was requested that Council come to carry out maintenance work and re-instate the dislodged boulders.

 

Comment: Details on the request for works have been forwarded Council’s Operations Department.

 

This submission also requests that Council keeps residents updated on any future action.

 

Comment:  As community consultation is a key component of the NSW floodplain risk management process, affected residents will be notified as any further studies or work is being undertaken.

5

Email

Email Written

This submission considers that the Council owned bridge in Tennyson Avenue, Turramurra constitutes a flooding “hot spot” and is poorly designed, resulting in restricted flow and a build-up of flood water, and urgently requires more targeted hydrologic modelling and the development of a flood mitigation strategy.

 

Comment: This crossing was surveyed for the study and the culverts were found to be generally aligned with the direction of flow; however issues caused by blockage and any capacity or realignment improvements required will be investigated in the next stage of the flood risk management process - the flood risk management study and plan.

 

This submission also provides observations of floods since 1984:

 

·     January 1991 resulted in the loss of a number of large gum trees located immediately upstream of the Tennyson Avenue road bridge.  Since that time, both the frequency and height of the flooding have been reduced.

·     This was demonstrated in 2010 when the rainfall pattern resulted in a lower flood level than expected.

 

Comment:  In regards to flood severity there are many factors that could influence particular floods and make them behave differently to similar events or differently to the model. For instance, the number of fallen trees in the 1991 storm may have caused a greater blockage than what was assumed in the model (50%). This is one of the reasons why the model sensitivity has been tested as part of the flood study.

 

This submission also demonstrated concern that despite that fact that a residence in Cudgee Street is located in the middle of the flood plain and therefore must cause a slowing and diversion of the flow on flood water, Ku-ring-gai Council approved major renovations to this residence in the late 1990s.  In 2015, Ku-ring-gai Council approved a DA for an additional story to be added. 

 

Comment: Flooding was considered in 2015, particularly for the new foot bridge. Renovations in this instance were for a second storey and new bridge. Undertaking the flood risk management process does not aim to prevent development from occurring, just ensure it is appropriately considered.

 

This submission also commented on a recently submitted DA for a nearby property that did not include a flood study showing the impact of the new residence.  This is rather surprising considering the flooding of this property shown in the Lovers Jump Creek Study.

 

Comment:  The draft mapping from the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study has been requested to be considered for this DA.

 

This submission also noted that there is little point in either the current Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study or further more targeted studies unless Ku-ring-gai Council is prepared to take remedial action to mitigate flooding caused by Council owned infrastructure.  In the case of the road bridge in Tennyson Avenue, Turramurra, Council may need to consider the demolition of this bridge based on weighing up of benefits versus costs.

 

Comment: Council has applied for funding to undertake the next stage of the flood risk management process – the flood risk management study and plan. This will identify the main areas of concern and appropriate solutions where required.

 

As most of the comments are more relevant to the next stage of the flood risk management process no changes have been made to the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study based on the submissions received during the public exhibition period.

 

The Flood Risk Management Committee was invited to make submissions during the public exhibition period; however, apart from minor amendments, no comments were received. Minor changes have been made the report based on feedback from Council staff and the Flood Risk Management Committee include minor typos and corrections, the inclusion of summary tables indicating the number of properties inundated by modelled events and inclusion of resident photographs of various events (used with permission).

 

The final report and the outcomes of the public exhibition will be addressed at the next Flood Risk Management Committee meeting.

 

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study will be used to inform land use planning, flood mitigation measures, emergency management and drainage system upgrades.

 

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report is circulated as a separate attachment to this report.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Community, People and Culture

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

An aware community able to prepare and respond to the risk to life and property from emergency events.

Plans are developed in partnership with emergency service agencies and key stakeholders and implemented.

Undertake floodplain risk study in consultation with floodplain risk management committee.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Council’s Flood Risk Management Committee, which held its first meeting in April 2015, has overseen the development of this flood study. The Committee includes community, industry and government representation and has been invaluable in providing technical review, advice, guidance and ensuring community consultation has been effective.

 

In addition to working with the Committee, Jacobs have worked closely with Council, OEH and the Lovers Jump Creek community in the preparation of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study.

 

Risk Management

 

Historically, floods occurring in various parts of Australia have highlighted the importance of floodplain risk management, raising public awareness of the need for all councils to provide landowners with the best possible information on the risk of flooding to their property.

 

The preparation of detailed flood studies (such as the Blackbutt Creek and Lovers Jump Creek flood studies) is an important step in the NSW Government’s floodplain risk management process, as per the NSW Floodplain Development Manual (2005). Detailed flood studies inform the preparation of flood risk management plans, which identify areas of both minor and major flooding risk, enabling landowners and Council to make informed decisions when proposing, approving and carrying out development in areas that may be subject to flood events; and prioritise flood mitigation measures and drainage system works. The use of such information has the potential to significantly reduce the risk to life and property.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The cost of this study has been primarily funded ($110,000) from the 2013/2014 NSW Floodplain Management Program, administered by the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH). Council has contributed additional funds ($55,000) to this study.

 

Social Considerations

 

Undertaking flood mapping in any area has a number of implications for property owners. Any mapping undertaken can impact property values, insurance premiums, planning controls and future development options.

 

Community concerns have been considered through the community consultation processes conducted as part of the preparation of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study, as outlined in the Community Consultation section below.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

The NSW Floodplain Development Manual (2005) clearly identifies the need for flood risk management to take into account the principles of ecologically sustainable development and to consider ways of “maintaining and enhancing riverine and floodplain ecology in the development of floodplain risk management plans (section 1.1.2).

 

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study will inform any future floodplain risk management plans. These plans will be useful for planning environmental remediation and regeneration projects and in ensuring that any works are complementary to the flood mitigation measures for the area.

 

Community Consultation

 

Community consultation has been a key component of this study. The consultation activities undertaken to date are outlined below:

 

·     Community bulletin and questionnaire (January/February 2015): Letter to residents living along drainage lines, easements and watercourses in the Lovers Jump Creek catchment (approximately 890) informing them of the study (through the community bulletin) and inviting them to complete a questionnaire relating to their experience of flooding. A total of 70 responses were received, 24 of which included observations of past flooding.

 

·     Community forum (October 2015): Invitations were sent to all residents whose properties were identified on the probable maximum flood map (PMF). At the forum Jacobs conducted a presentation and residents were able to view the initial modelling results and provide comments and feedback. Approximately 20 residents attended.

 

·     Community bulletin (December 2015/January 2016): Sent to all those on the contact list, 54 via e-mail (December) and 8 via mail (January), summarising progress since the community forum.

 

·     Public exhibition of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Draft Report (February - March 2016). The community was notified of the public exhibition through Council’s corporate advertisement; Council’s ‘Have my say’ web page; mailing 322 letters to residents and owners of properties that are impacted by the Overland and Mainstream Flow Provisional Flood Planning Area map; and a flood study bulletin email update to residents on the Lovers Jump Creek flood study email list.

 

In addition to consultation with the local community, the Flood Risk Management Committee and officers from OEH have been closely involved in all stages of the study and have reviewed all progress reports.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Staff from the Strategy and Environment, Development & Regulation and Operations departments have been involved throughout all stages of the study.

 

Summary

 

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study is the second detailed flood study to be undertaken by Ku-ring-gai Council and builds on the preliminary study completed by Mott MacDonald Hughes Trueman in 2011 on flood risk for the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area (LGA).This flood study is an essential step in the NSW Government’s floodplain risk management process, as per the NSW Floodplain Development Manual (2005).

 

In August 2014, consultants Jacobs were awarded the tender to undertake the flood study and have since been working with Council, the Flood Risk Management Committee, OEH and the community to consolidate background information and develop models for the catchment, to aid in the preparation of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study. This study defines the existing flood behaviour in the area, the hazards posed to existing development and the capacity of the community to respond to a flood emergency.

 

In order to give the community an opportunity to review the study and provide feedback prior to finalisation, the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Draft Report was placed on public exhibition from 26 February 2016 – 29 March 2016. Apart from a few minor amendments, no changes have been made to the flood study based on the submissions received during the public exhibition period.

 

The Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study will be used to inform land use planning, flood mitigation measures, emergency management and drainage system upgrades.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council endorses the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report

 

B.   That Council acknowledges the formal submissions made on the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Draft report and responds to the authors with the outcomes.

 

C.   That a copy of the Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study – Final Report is placed on Council’s website.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sophia Findlay

Water and Catchments Program Leader

 

 

 

 

Marnie Kikken

Manager Environment & Sustainability

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Lovers Jump Creek Flood Study - Final Report

Click here to view attachment

2016/109936

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

GB.5 / 227

 

 

Item GB.5

CY00368/6

 

10 February 2016

 

 

Lindfield Village Green - Design Services - Request for Tender No. 07-2016

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council of the Tenders received for Tender No.07-2016 - Lindfield Village Green - Design Services and to seek approval to carry out the actions outlined in the recommendations A to F.

 

 

background:

Lindfield Village Green (LVG) developed out of Council’s Open Space Acquisition Program and will be funded largely by Development Contributions.

At its meeting of 23 June 2015 Council in part resolved to:

 

(a)    adopt the concept plan prepared by JMD Design & TZG (Option B) as the preferred design.

 

Due to the quantum of fees involved in the next stage of the project Council called tender for the development of the design and the obtaining of development consent.

 

 

comments:

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 27 February 2016 and closed 5 April 2016.

Nine (9) submissions have been received. The submissions were assessed using the published criteria.

 

 

recommendation:

In accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations, it is recommended that Council decline all submissions and authorise negotiations with the tenders submitted by tenderers ‘A’ to ‘D’ as identified in the Confidential Attachment A1 to this report.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To advise Council of the Tenders received for Tender No.07-2016 - Lindfield Village Green - Design Services and to seek approval to carry out the actions outlined in the recommendations A to F.  

 

 

Background

 

Lindfield Village Green (LVG) developed out of Council’s Open Space Acquisition Program.  The aim of the program is to deliver new local parks and public plazas in areas where residential densities and population are increasing.

 

The LVG project will be utilising development contribution funds to construct an underground car park on the site of an existing Council car park located on the eastern side of Lindfield local centre, just 50 metres from the rail station. By relocating the car parking underground the surface is freed to create a new public plaza and park which will be almost 3,000sqm in area.

 

Council has previously adopted a concept design for the project which was prepared mid-2015 through a select tender and subsequent competition process.  Due to the quantum of fees involved in the next stage of the project Council called tender for the development of the design and the obtaining of development consent.

 

Once development consent has been obtained a further tender shall be called for the detailed documentation taking the design through to Construction Certificate stage.

 

Council has yet to obtain agreement from Transport for NSW (TfNSW) to fund the proposed lower level of commuter parking.  However, as it is a simpler task to remove one level of car parking from the design than to add it in later, the methodology is to continue on the basis that an agreement will be made with TfNSW and a S96 application will be lodged to amend the approval if required.

 

Comments

 

Nine (9) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. In alphabetical order, tenders were received from the following companies:

 

·     Baker Kavanagh Architects

·     Brewster Hjorth Architects

·     DEM (Aust) Pty Ltd

·     DesignInc Ltd

·     GHD Pty Ltd

·     JMD Design

·     Quattro Architecture

·     Smith and Tzannes Pty Ltd

·     Wood & Grieve Engineers Limited

 

A Tender Evaluation Committee (TEC) consisting of staff from the Operations Department and Strategy and Environment Department was formed to assess the nine (9) tenders received. The evaluation took into account:

 

·     conformity of submission;

·     appreciation of the task;

·     company and staff experience;

·     past performance and relevant project experience; and

·     value for money.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Places, Spaces and Infrastructure - P4 Revitalisation of our centres

 

Community, People and Culture - C4 Healthy lifestyles

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

A range of well planned, clean and safe neighbourhoods and public spaces designed with a strong sense of identity and place.

 

P4.1.1

Plans to revitalise local centres are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community.

 

P4.1.4

An improvement plan for Lindfield centre is being progressively implemented in collaboration with owners, businesses and state agencies.

 

Implement a place management approach for the local centre improvements to coordinate works and achieve quality outcomes.

 

Engage with relevant stakeholders to establish timing, extent and partnership opportunities.

 

Undertake due diligence and undertake project scope.

 

Identify and engage with the key stakeholders.

A healthy, safe, and diverse community that respects our history, and celebrates our differences in a vibrant culture of learning.

C4.1.2

New and enhanced open space and recreational facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment.

 

 

 Undertake acquisitions for new parks.

 

Undertake assessment and identify locations for new parks

 

Complete the design for identified parks and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities.

 

Construct parks at identified locations and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities

 

FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN

 

The NSW Government's Fit for the Future initiative required all councils to prepare an Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan demonstrating how all seven Fit for the Future benchmarks would be met by 2016/17, and maintained or improved thereafter.

 

Council's Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan underpins the decision to stand alone and not merge with Hornsby Council. The objectives established in the Improvement Proposal and Implementation Plan are embedded in Council's adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting documents including the Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2015-2016, Long Term Financial Plan 2015/16 to 2024/25 and Asset Management Strategy 2015/16 to 2024/25.

 

As the actions proposed in this report result from previous Council Resolutions all proposed actions are in accordance with Council’s Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan.

 

Governance Matters

 

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 27 February 2016 with a closing date of 5 April 2016. At the close of tender, nine (9) tenders were received. All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. A Tender Evaluation Committee consisting of staff from the Operations Department and Strategy and Environment Department assessed the nine (9) tenders received. The process was overseen by a Probity Adviser from the Contracts & Procurement Department. The evaluation took into account:

 

·     conformity of submission;

·     appreciation of the task;

·     company and staff experience;

·     past performance and relevant project experience; and

·     value for money.

 

The Confidential Attachment A1 to this report includes the list of tenders received and the TEC’s comments and recommendation. The attachment is considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(iii) of the Local Government Act as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.

 

Risk Management

 

Due to the recommendation that all submissions be rejected at this stage, the evaluation of financial risk was not carried out. However, as part of the negotiations and prior to a recommendation, an independent Performance and Financial Assessment will be carried out on the preferred tender[s] to ensure they are trading responsibly and have the financial capacity to undertake the work as detailed within the tender documents and or negotiated.

 

The independent Performance and Financial Assessment will examine the following areas:

 

·     the tenderer’s financial capacity to undertake the proposed value of work;

·     that the tenderer has been trading in a profitable and responsible manner during the last three (3) years; and

·     that the tenderer has sufficient assets/reserves to cover all possible debts during the period of work.

 

Financial Considerations

 

This project is identified in Council’s Long Term Financial Plan and listed in Council’s Revised Delivery Program 2013 – 2017. The Operational Plan 2015 – 2016 identifies funds in the Capital Works Program & Operational Projects 2015/2016 and 2016/2017; the funds allocated will be adequate to complete the work proposed to be undertaken as part of Tender No.07-2016 - Lindfield Village Green - Design Services.

 

Social Considerations

 

The provision of additional community infrastructure providing outdoor community spaces will continue to support this process and help Ku-ring-gai continue to be a vibrant and popular place to live for all ages.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental issues arising from this report. All environmental impacts will be considered as part of a Statement of Environmental Effects which will be prepared as part of the proposed scope of work.

 

Community Consultation

 

Consultation work undertaken to date by Council includes:

 

•        workshops and meetings with key stakeholders – TfNSW and RMS;

•        Community day event on 21 March 2015 to launch the public exhibition of three (3) concept designs during 21 March to 8 May 2015, including community workshop on 29 April 2015;

·        18 September 2015 Celebrate Park(ing) Day community engagement on site;

·        Ongoing meetings with project site adjacent neighbours;

•        a new website for ‘Activate Lindfield’; and

•        telephone calls and emails addressing enquiries.

 

Internal Consultation

 

GMD is the project owner and sponsor of the project. The Project Steering Group consists of:

 

•        Director Strategy and Environment

•        Director Operations

•        Director Community

•        Director Corporate

•        Manager Projects Operations

•        Manager Strategic Projects

•        Manager Corporate Communications.

 

Regular quarterly status updates and progress has been reported to the Project Steering Group.

 

Extensive internal consultation has occurred as part of the Design Competition including staff from Operations, Community, Strategy and Environment, Corporate and Development and Regulation.

 

Summary

 

Council, as part of the Open Space Acquisition Program, approved funding for the Lindfield Village Green project.

 

Following internal and community consultation, tender documentation was produced with tenders being called on 27 February 2016 with a closing date of 5 April 2016.

 

A Tender Evaluation Committee was formed consisting of representatives from Operations and Strategy and Environments Departments. At the close of tender, nine (9) tenders were received.

 

All tenders were recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. Following the evaluation it is recommended that all submissions be rejected.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That Council decline to accept any of the tender submissions for Design Services - Lindfield Village Green.

 

B.       That Council enter into negotiations with the four (4) tenderers A - D as identified in the Confidential Attachment A1 Tender Evaluation Report.

 

C.       That the General Manager be authorised to negotiate the terms of the contract.

 

D.       That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.

 

E.       That the seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.

 

F.       That all tenderers be advised of Councils decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.

 

 

 

 

Sue-Anne Fulton

Public Domain Projects Officer

 

 

Dean Payne

Project Leader

 

 

Ian Dreghorn

Manager Strategic Projects

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

Attachments:

A1

Tender Evaluation Report for Tender No. 07/2016

 

Confidential

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

GB.6 / 233

 

 

Item GB.6

S08640/3

 

21 April 2016

 

 

Lindfield Learning Village
Draft Heads of Agreement

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To seek Council’s support for an “in-principle” agreement to the Draft Heads of Agreement for the Lindfield Learning Village at the former University of Technology site at Lindfield

 

 

background:

The University of Technology has now vacated the site at Lindfield and the Department of Education are in the process of creating a new school under the Learning Village concept. Discussions and site inspections have been held with Councillors and various staff on the possibility of utilising part of the facilities for the community under a Department and Community Partner relationship and agreement.

 

 

comments:

A number of meetings have been held with the representatives of the Department of Education and Council officers to progress the future arrangements on how the model could work.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council advise the Department of Education of its “in-principle” agreement for community use of various facilities on the site in accordance with the Draft Heads of Agreement attached to this report.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To seek Council’s support for an “in-principle” agreement to the Draft Heads of Agreement for the Lindfield Learning Village at the former University of Technology site at Lindfield

 

 

Background

 

The University of Technology has now vacated the site at Lindfield and the Department of Education (DEC) are in the process of creating a new school under the Learning Village concept.

 

Discussions and site inspections have been held with Councillors and various staff on the possibility of utilising part of the facilities for the community under a Department of Education and Community Partner relationship and agreement.

 

The Department of Education is looking to implement a model that includes community use of facilities at its schools. This would provide benefits for the school and the community. Similar models are currently operating in Regional NSW.

 

Comments

 

Attached is a letter from the Department of Education requesting Council’s involvement in developing a Heads of Agreement for community use of the site at Eton Road Lindfield.

 

A number of meetings have been held with the representatives of the Department of Education and Council officers to progress future arrangements on how the model could work. A copy of the Draft Heads of Agreement is attached. However, it should be noted there is a lot of detail requirements needed to be sourced before the Heads of Agreement can be signed by both parties. Before any further work can be done on finalising the Heads of Agreement, it is necessary to seek Council’s “in-principle” agreement to allow staff to finalise the arrangements and develop the model further.

 

The site has a number of facilities that could be heavily used by the community such as the indoor sports centre, the gymnasium and dance areas, the theatres and the child care facilities.

 

Conversely, the school would have need for the use of the sports field as open space area as there is very limited area on the school grounds. The use of the sports field by the school will increase the wear and tear of the synthetic layer and the Department of Education has indicated its agreement to paying an annual fee towards the replacement of the surface based on the life cycle costs. The field will only be used during school times and managed through Council’s booking system.

 

Council staff have been in regular contact with the Marian Street Theatre Young People’s Group (MSTYP) to help establish a base for the theatre group using the lecture theatres on the site. Should Council support the “in-principle” agreement with the Department of Education, further discussions will be held with MSTYP and the DEC on the requirements to be incorporated in the upgrade to the theatres.

 

On acceptance of the “in-principle” agreement, staff will continue to work with the DEC on completing the milestones as indicated in their letter.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

P6.1.1 Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

Partnerships are established

with community groups and

organisations to optimise the

availability and use of sporting,

recreation and leisure facilities.

 

Engage with community partners to improve Council’s sporting and recreational facilities.

Pursue improvement of sporting and recreational facilities through partnerships, grant funding and other external funding opportunities.

 

FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN

 

The Office of Local Government has issued guidelines for merger Councils and the acceptance of an “in-principle” agreement is not considered to be binding on the Council until the agreement is signed by both parties. However, work needs to continue on developing the final agreement in order to have actions in place prior to a Principal being appointed to the Learning Village.

 

Governance Matters

 

The Department of Education will be undertaking all the planning and procurement processes associated with the works proposed for the site.

 

Risk Management

 

Council will need to consider the risks associated with the agreement such as financial and resourcing prior to the signing of the final agreement and these matters will be addressed in a future report.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The primary objective of the agreement is for the use of the facilities to be cost neutral to Council.

 

A new cost centre will be established to manage revenue and expenditure for the facilities used by the community and ongoing maintenance requirements for Council. A detailed analysis of these requirements will need to be undertaken before the final Heads of Agreement is signed by both parties.

 

The “in-principle” Draft Heads of Agreement sets out the broad parameters for the cost neutrality framework.

 

 

 

Social Considerations

 

The inclusion of community use of the facilities listed above will provide increased social and cultural aspects for the community and will ultimately save Council from additional capital expenditure on the facilities available on the site.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Environmental considerations will be taken into account in the documentation associated with the upgrades to the facilities.

 

Community Consultation

 

Various representatives of the community will be engaged in the planning and design of the upgrades.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Staff from Community and Operations Departments have been involved in the preliminary discussions on the likely framework for the agreement.

 

Further internal consultation will be required with other Departments on the planning and financial considerations associated with the agreement.

 

Summary

 

The Department of Education is looking to implement a model that includes community use of facilities at its schools which could provide benefits for the school and the community. Similar models are currently operating in Regional NSW.

 

A number of meetings have been held with the representatives of the Department of Education and Council officers to progress future arrangements on how the model could work. A copy of the Draft Heads of Agreement is attached.

 

However, it should be noted that a lot of the detail requirements need to be sourced before the Heads of Agreement can be signed by both parties. Before any further work can be done on finalising the Heads of Agreement, it is necessary to seek Council’s “in-principle” agreement to allow staff to finalise the arrangements and develop the model further.

 

The site has a number of facilities that could be heavily used by the community such as the indoor sports centre, the gymnasium and dance areas, the theatres and the child care facilities.

 

On acceptance of the “in-principle” agreement, staff will continue to work with the DEC on completing the milestones as indicated in their letter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council advise the Department of Education of its “in-principle” agreement for community use of various facilities on the site in accordance with the Draft Heads of Agreement attached to this report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greg Piconi

Director Operations

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Letter from Department of Education

 

2016/052006

 

A2

Draft - Head of Agreement Proposal

 

2016/106535

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Letter from Department of Education

 

Item No: GB.6

 


 


APPENDIX No: 2 - Draft - Head of Agreement Proposal

 

Item No: GB.6

 

 

 

 

LINDFIELD LEARNING VILLAGE JOINT VENTURE –

HEADS OF AGREEMENT PROPOSAL

 

v     This form is to be completed by the Department of Education and Communities in conjunction with the proposed Community Partner and must be signed on behalf of the Department of Education and Communities and the Community Partner. The Parties are NOT to delete any text from this document, use strikethrough feature if necessary, e.g. the Proposal.

v     Confirms the Department’s and the Community Partner's intention to enter into a Joint Venture Agreement covering the construction or refurbishment of the Facility and its ongoing shared use.

v     In this Proposal:

·                   'Parties' means the Department of Education and Communities (or School Council if appropriate) and the Community Partner (or Community Partners if more than one).

·                   'Facility' refers to the building or other kind of community resource (such as a sporting field) being constructed, developed or refurbished.

·                   'Minister' means the Minister for Education.

·                   'Department' means the Department of Education and Communities.

·                   'Community Partner' means the organisation identified in item 2.

·                   'Works’ means the construction or development works to build or refurbish the Facility.


 

 

Part A - Administration

Item 1    SCHOOL DETAILS - if more than one school please provide details for each school (copy and paste the details below for each school)

School Name

Lindfield Learning Village

Department Representative

Joe Lantz

Street Address

 

Postal Address

 

Email Address(for correspondence)

 

Contact person (for correspondence)

 

Telephone

 

Fax

 

 

Item 2    PROPOSED COMMUNITY PARTNER - if more than one partner please provide details for each partner (copy and paste the details below for each school)

Correct Legal Name

Kur-ring-gai Council - KMC

Street Address

818 Pacific Highway Gordon

Postal Address

PO Box 1006 Gordon NSW 2072

Email Address (for correspondence)

kmc@kmc.nsw.gov.au

Contact person (for correspondence)

Greg Piconi – Director Operations

Telephone

(02) 9424 0796

Fax

(02) 9424 0001

If the Community Partner is not a local government authority, provide an ACN or ABN

ABN

86 408 856 411

 


 

Part B - The Land and the Facility

Item 3    THE LAND ON WHICH THE FACILITY WILL BE DEVELOPED

Will the Facility be located on land owned by more than one party?

£ Yes                       P No

Identify who owns the land on which the Facility is being developed and any relevant arrangements in respect of that land.

 

P Education land owned or managed by the Minister

£ Land owned by a local government authority

£ Land owned by a Community Partner which is not a local
    government authority

£ Crown land managed by a local government authority
    (provide further details below)

Where applicable, provide details about the management arrangements for the Crown land:

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

Unless the land is School land, the parties must attach a plan of the land showing the location of the proposed Facility. 

£ Yes, a plan of the land is attached.

P No, it is not necessary to provide a plan of the land as it is
    Education land, owned or managed by the Minister.

 

Item 4    THE FACILITY AND THE CONSTRUCTION WORKS

Type of development/redevelopment

P Construction or development of a new Facility

£ Refurbishment of an existing Facility
£ Construction or development of a new Facility and
    refurbishment of an existing Facility

£Other, provide details:

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

Describe the proposed works and the completed facility

 

Construction of synthetic turf playing field and associated field lighting. Construction of multi-court outdoor sports courts

 

 

Item 5    CONCEPT PLANS OF THE FACILITY

Concept plan provision

The concept plan should clearly identify the facility components where the Facility is located on the Land.

P Yes, concept plans are attached

Item 6    PLANNING APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT AND USE

Consultation with appropriate authorities for development and use of the facility.

 

P Department confirms    P Community Partner confirms

Do the parties consider that planning approval will be required for the construction or development of the Facility?

P Yes (To be determined)    £ No

Is a planning approval required for the use of the Facility?

P Yes (approval received)    £ No

Part C - Construction Phase

Item 7    CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE WORKS                                                              

Capital cost estimates:

 

-  Consultants fees (construction
    related)

$

 

 

-  Construction costs (including a
 contingency)

$

 

 

-  Estimated total cost of the
Works

$

 

 

Level of capital cost report

£ Quantity surveyor report     £ Architect report

£ Other (specify below)

Item 8    CONTRIBUTIONS BY THE PARTIES                                                                                                          

Partner capital cost contribution – detail the capital contribution from each partnering organisation:

Note: The total monetary contributions must match the estimated total cost of the works contained in Item 7 above

Party:

Contribution:

1.  School Council

$

 

 

2.  Community Partner

$

NIL

 

3.  Minister for Education/Department of Education & Training

$

 

 

Estimated total
contributions

$

 

 

Item 9    LEGAL COSTS FOR PREPARING THE COMMUNITY JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

What is the estimated legal cost incurred by the Department in preparing the Community JVA, including:

·     each version of the JVA that is drafted

·     legal advice the Department seeks in preparing this specific Community JVA

 

 

 

$____________________

On what is the above estimate of legal costs based?

 

£ Quotes / estimates received from law firms listed on the  Department’s Legal Services Panel

£ Other (specify below)

What is each party's proposed contribution towards the estimated cost of the legal fees?

 

Party:

Contribution:

1.  Department

$

           100             %

 

2.  Community Partner

$

             0             %

 

Estimated total legal costs

$/%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10   TENDERING AND CONSTRUCTION                                                                  

Which party is responsible for administering the tender process and entering into the building contract with the Contractor?

P Minister/Department       £ Community Partner

£ School Council (if the cost of the works is
greater than $50,000, Minister’s approval is required)   

Parties to confirm the Building Contract must be an Australian Standard Contract AS2124-1992including the Department's standard special conditions. 

If the Works are on the Community Partners land and a different Building Contract is proposed please provide details.

P Department agrees       P Community Partner agrees

 

£ Not Applicable (complete details below):

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

Will the works be carried out in stages? 

If the works are to be carried out in stages provide this requested information:

·      The number of stages;

·      The Works comprising each stage;

·      The proposed dates, or time frames for each stage; and

·      When the use of the Facility will commence on a staged basis or only upon completion of all the Works, that is, when the final stage is complete.

£ Yes                                P No

If yes, provide the requested information:

 

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

 

Item 11   CONSTRUCTION PHASE INSURANCE

Where the Community Partner is responsible for construction, the Community Partner must confirm that it will ensure the required insurance (as listed in this Item) is arranged for the construction phase.

Note 1: This insurance may be taken out by the building contractor or arranged by the Community Partner.

Note 2: Further information about the scope of the required insurance is contained in the Instructions.

P Public liability insurance with a limit of $20 million.


P Contract Works insurance as required by AS2124-1992.

P Workers' compensation insurance as required by State
    and Federal Law.

£ Not applicable as the Community Partner is not responsible
    for construction.

 

Item 12     SECURITY FOR THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION

If the Community Partner is responsible for construction and is not a local government authority, and the Facility is being constructed on School land, the Community Partner confirms that it agrees to provide construction security in the amount of 10% of the total estimated construction costs.  The form of the construction security is an unconditional bank undertaking.

Note:  The topic of Security is discussed in detail in the Instructions

£ Yes, the Community Partner agrees to provide construction
     security in the form of an unconditional bank undertaking
     in the sum of 10% of the estimated total costs of the works
     as set out in Item 7 above.

£ No, this is not applicable.

 

For this project, parts D, E and F have been split into two sections. The first section (1) is in relation to the ‘Indoor Sport Centre Component’ (community/council) and the second (2) relates to ‘Court 1’ of the ‘Lindfield Learning Village Component’.

Part D1 - Lease Details and Date of Operation

Item 13 (1)   LEASE TERM                                                                                                    

What Initial Lease Term and Further Term are the parties proposing? 

Note:  The parties may propose a lesser term than the choices indicated, subject to approval of the Department if the Facility is located on School land.

Initial Term: 

£ 20 years             £ 25 years

P 30 years             £ Lesser term (specify below)

                                 Years________________

Further Term: 

£ Not Applicable

£ 10 years             £15 years

P 20 years             £Lesser term (specify below)

                               Years__________________

Item 14 (1)     LICENCE FEE

What is the proposed licence fee

 

$_Nil___________________

 

Item 15 (1)     DATE OF OPERATION                                                                                          

When will use of the Facility commence? 

 

Note:  If works are staged parties to take this into account

P From the completion of the construction or
     development works

£ From the date of the Joint Venture Agreement

£ From an alternative agreed date (specify below)

__________________________

 

Part E1 - Use of the Facility

Item 16 (1)     PERMITTED USE                                                                                                 

What will the Community Partner be using the completed Facility for?  If there is more than one proposed use, list each one.

Public recreation, Theatre and entertainment, community-meeting spaces, art classes, games and organised sporting activities.

Item 17 (1)      TIMES OF USE                                                                                                   

How will the parties share use of the Facility? 

Choose from Options 1, 2 and 3

£ Option 1- School access during agreed school hours
     and access by the Community Partner outside those
     hours.  No overlapping use.

P Option 2 - Overlapping use by the School and the
    Community Partner although there may still be agreed school
    hours.  Different parts of the Facility may have different
    agreed times of use.  

£ Option 3 - Calendar of Use agreed between the parties
    on an annual basis.

Have the parties agreed on overall Operating/Opening Hours for the Facility (comprising the School Hours and the Community Partner's Hours)?

Note: Sometimes limited total operating hours may be a condition of a planning permit.

P Yes                                 £ No

If yes, what are the agreed Facility Operating Hours?

·      Anytime from 6am to 11pm

Unless the parties do not wish to include such a provision, the formal Community Joint Venture Agreement will provide that the School is entitled to use the entire Facility, or a specified part of the Facility, outside School Hours, free of any charge, an agreed number of times during each term or year.

P Yes, the parties want the School to have this right.

If yes, indicate how many times per term or per year the School is entitled to such use and whether the entire Facility can be used or only certain parts.

No. of times per year ____NA___________ 

P Entire Facility can be used  £ Only certain parts can be used
                                                 (specify below)

                                                 _______________________

                                                 _______________________

£ No, the parties do not want the School to have this right.

Item 18 (1)      OTHER USE ARRANGEMENTS

Will one party (School Council or Community Partner) be responsible for the overall management and operation of the Facility at all times? 

 

P Yes                                   £ No

If yes, which party?

£ School Council                   P Community Partner

If yes are there specific arrangements that the parties wish to include in the JVA provide these details below:

_________________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

Do the parties propose to sub-licence any part of the Facility

 

£ Yes, the parties propose to appoint a sub-licensee.

P No, the parties do not propose to appoint a sub-licensee.

If yes, describe the proposed arrangement:

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

If yes, do the parties require preparation of a draft sub-licence?

£ Yes                 £ No           £ Not applicable

Are there any other conditions of use to which the parties have agreed or specific arrangements related to use that the parties wish to be reflected in the JVA?

£ No, there are no additional conditions or arrangements                

PIf yes, provide details below:

The use by the Department of the synthetic soccer field adjacent to the learning Village and owned by KMC from 9am to 2 pm and additionally as agreed by a between the parties for specific one off or regular activities. The use will be subject to replacement of the surface as agreed such that the quality is maintained. The Department would not be required to comply with the footwear standard set out in the warranty. The surface replacement would be funded proportional to forgone normal warranty period of standard use following the warranty requirements. The parties may agree to replace the surface with a more appropriate technology into the future based on a benefit cost analysis.

The Department will pay annual fee for the day time use of the field and a proportion of the life-cycle costs of the field due to increased usage of the field.

Item 19 (1)      HIRE OF THE FACILITY                                                                                       

Which party is responsible for hiring the Facility to community users outside School Hours?  Or will the responsibility for hiring be shared between the parties depending on the area of the Facility involved?

£ School Council responsible for all hiring outside School Hours

P Community Partner responsible for all hiring outside School or agreed Hours

£ Hire outside School Hours to be shared (describe below)  

Areas the School is responsible for hiring:

__________________________________________________

Areas the Community Partner is responsible for hiring:

__________________________________________________

Is it intended to appoint a third party to manage the hire outside School Hours (that is, the community hire?)

 

£ Yes, the parties propose to appoint a third party to manage
     the hire of the Facility outside School Hours

If yes, identify the proposed third party:

__________________________________________________

P No, the parties do not propose such an arrangement

Is all of the Facility available for community hire outside School Hours or only certain areas?

 

P All of the Facility is available for hire

£ Only some areas are available for community hire (describe
    which areas below)

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

Will the revenue from hire to the community (that is, hire outside School Hours) belong to one party or be shared?  

 

P Revenue will belong to the Community Partner

£ Revenue will belong to the School Council

£ Revenue will be shared (describe sharing arrangement
     below)     

_______________________________________________

________________________________________________   

£ Revenue paid into Operating Account (as per Section G,
    Option 6)

How will the community hire fees be set?

 

P The party responsible for hire to the community will set the
     fees

£ The hire fees will be set by agreement between the parties
     (add any further comments below
)                       

The fees will be advertised as part of setting KMC IP&R process

__________________________________________________

 


 

 

Part F1 - Maintenance

Item 20 (1)      RESPONSIBILITY FOR GENERAL MAINTENANCE                                       

How have the parties agreed to share the maintenance of the Facility? 

Note: Maintenance is assumed to include general repairs, cleaning and security arrangements.  If the parties wish to have a separate specific arrangement in relation to a particular item, such as an electronic security system or computer server or cleaning, this should be detailed on a separate page and attached to this Proposal.

 

 

£ Option 1 - One party is responsible for arranging and paying
    for all maintenance for the Facility with the other party to
    reimburse it an agreed percentage of the costs or pay a fixed
    annual maintenance contribution.

P Option 2 - One party is responsible for arranging and paying
    for all maintenance of the Facility with the other party to
    reimburse it, based on the other party's proportionate
    entitlement to use the Facility.

£ Option 3 - The parties have agreed to be responsible for
    arranging and paying for the maintenance of separate areas
    of the Facility. This Option usually applies where there is
    little or no overlapping use of the different areas of the
    Facility. 

£ Option 4 - The parties have agreed to a Maintenance
    Schedule which sets out their maintenance obligations.

£ Option 5 - One party is responsible for arranging and paying
    for all maintenance for the Facility with no reimbursement.

£ Option 6 - The parties agree to establish an Operating
    Account to collect revenue generated by the Facility and pay
    for maintenance and any other specified operational
    expenses (excluding Capital Expenditure).

 

If the parties have selected Option 1, complete this section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note 1: If the parties select a fixed annual maintenance contribution the default position is for this amount to increase by CPI each year. Alternatively, the parties may specify a different method for this annual increase.

 

Which party is responsible for arranging the maintenance works and paying in the first instance?

£ School Council                    P Community Partner

Will the maintenance costs be reimbursed by the other party as a percentage or a fixed annual maintenance contribution? Select option and provide details.

£ Percentage:              %

£ Fixed annual maintenance contribution:    $___________

If the parties have selected “Fixed annual maintenance contribution”, complete the following:

£ Parties select the default position; or

£ Parties wish to specify own method of annual increase
    (specify below)               

__________________________________________________


Select the arrangements for reimbursement:

Timing for issue of an invoice by the party who paid the costs:

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

£ 6 monthly                          £ Annually

£ Other, specify: ___________________________

Timing for payment of that invoice:

£ 30 days                             £ 45 days

£ 60 days

If the parties have selected Option 2, complete this section.

 

Which party is responsible for arranging the maintenance works and paying in the first instance?

£ School Council                    P Community Partner

Which party will determine how much each party is entitled to use the Facility?  Note:  This is usually the party who owns or manages the land, so for school land it will be the School Council.

£ School Council                    P Community Partner

Select the arrangements for reimbursement:

Timing for issue of an invoice by the party who paid the costs:

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

P 6 monthly                          £ Annually

£ Other, specify: ___________________________

Timing for payment of that invoice by the other party:

£ 30 days                             £ 45 days

£ 60 days

If the parties have selected Option 3, complete this section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the parties are sharing the costs of maintaining shared areas, e.g. common areas, storage areas, access routes, car-parks, complete this section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Describe what areas of the Facility will be maintained by each party:

The School Council is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance relating to the following areas:

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

The Community Partner is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance relating to the following areas:

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

£ Not applicable as no areas have shared financial responsibility.                          Move to Section H

In relation to the shared areas, identify who will arrange the maintenance and pay in the first instance:

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

Select the arrangements for reimbursement:

Timing for issue of an invoice by the party who paid the costs:

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

£ 6 monthly                          £ Annually

£ Other, specify: ___________________________

Timing for payment of that invoice:

£ 30 days                             £ 45 days

£ 60 days

Specify the areas of shared financial responsibility:

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

Specify each parties financial contribution:

School Council share (of shared areas):­­­­­­­­­­­_____ %

Community Partner share (of shared areas):______ %

If the parties have selected Option 4, complete this section.

Note: the Maintenance Schedule is to identify which party will arrange for the works and which party will pay for the works; if a proportion of the costs are to be reimbursed by the other party provide these details.

£ Parties confirm they have attached a proposed Maintenance
    Schedule to this Proposal.  If the Facility is located on School
    land, this Schedule is subject to Department approval.

If the parties have selected Option 5, complete this section.

Which party is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance for the Facility?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

If the parties have selected Option 6, complete this section.

Note 1:  The Operating Account is not intended to also cover Capital Expenditure.  The parties can establish a separate Capital Reserve Account for this purpose (see Item 22 below).

Note 2: If the Facility is on school land the School Council usually establishes the Operating Account.

Which party will establish the Operating Account?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

Which party is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance for the Facility?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

Do the parties intend for the Facility to be self-funding (based on projections that this is feasible) or do the parties propose to contribute to the Operating Account?

£ The parties intend the Facility to be self-funding.

£ The parties intend to contribute to the Operating Account.
    Identify the proposed annual contributions below and any
    specific arrangements for payment:

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

What does the Operating Account cover?

£ The Operating Account covers maintenance (see the Note in

     the first section of this Item 21).

£ The Operating Account also covers the following operating
     expenses (eg. property damage insurance, utilities etc):

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

Parties to confirm that all of the revenue from the community hire of the Facility be paid into the Operating Account.

£ School Council confirms

£ Community Partner confirms

What other funds (if any) are to be paid into the Operating Account?

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

If there is a deficit in the Operating Account, as calculated on an annual basis, how do the parties propose to meet such deficit?

School Council responsibility    __________  %

Community Partner responsibility   __________  %


 

For this project, parts D, E and F have been split into two sections. The first section (1) is in relation to the XXXX ‘Indoor Sport Centre Component’ (community/council) and the second (2) relates to ‘Court 1’ of the ‘Lindfield Learning Village Component’.

Part D2 - Licence Details and Date of Operation

Item 13 (2)      LICENCE TERM                                                                                                     

What Initial Licence Term and Further Term are the parties proposing? 

Note:  The parties may propose a lesser term than the choices indicated, subject to approval of the Department if the Facility is located on School land.

Initial Term: 

£ 20 years             £ 25 years

P 30 years             £ Lesser term (specify below)

                                 Years________________

Further Term: 

£ Not Applicable

£ 10 years             £15 years

P 20 years             £Lesser term (specify below)

                               Years__________________

Item 14 (2)   LICENCE FEE

What is the proposed licence fee

 

$_TBA___________________

 

Item 15 (2)  DATE OF OPERATION                                                                                          

When will use of the Facility commence? 

 

Note:  If works are staged parties to take this into account

P From the completion of the construction or
     development works

£ From the date of the Joint Venture Agreement

£ From an alternative agreed date (specify below)

__________________________

 

Part E2 - Use of the Facility

Item 16 (2)  PERMITTED USE                                                                                                 

What will the Community Partner and the Department (for the synthetic soccer surface) be using the completed Facility for?  If there is more than one proposed use, list each one.

Public recreation, community meeting rooms, performing arts, performance rehearsals, community arts groups, tutoring services, games and organised sporting activities, outdoor play area.

Item 17 (2)  TIMES OF USE                                                                                                   

How will the parties share use of the Facility? 

Choose from Options 1, 2 and 3

£ Option 1- School access during agreed school hours
     and access by the Community Partner outside those
     hours.  No overlapping use.

P Option 2 - Overlapping use by the School and the
    Community Partner although there may still be agreed school
    hours.  Different parts of the Facility may have different
    agreed times of use.  

£ Option 3 - Calendar of Use agreed between the parties
    on an annual basis.

Have the parties agreed on overall Operating/Opening Hours for the Facility (comprising the School Hours and the Community Partner's Hours)?

Note: Sometimes limited total operating hours may be a condition of a planning permit.

£  Yes                                 P No

If yes, what are the agreed Facility Operating Hours?

·      At any time on weekends or public holidays and during school holidays.

·      During school terms from 4:30pm to 10pm on Monday to Friday.

Unless the parties do not wish to include such a provision, the formal Community Joint Venture Agreement will provide that the School is entitled to use the entire Facility, or a specified part of the Facility, outside School Hours, free of any charge, an agreed number of times during each term or year.

P Yes, the parties want the School to have this right.

If yes, indicate how many times per term or per year the School is entitled to such use and whether the entire Facility can be used or only certain parts.

No. of times per year _____NA__________ 

P Entire Facility can be used  £ Only certain parts can be used
                                                 (specify below)

                                                 _______________________

                                                 _______________________

£ No, the parties do not want the School to have this right.

Item 18  (2)   OTHER USE ARRANGEMENTS

Will one party (School Council or Community Partner) be responsible for the overall management and operation of the Facility at all times? 

 

P Yes                                   £ No

If yes, which party?

P School Council                   £ Community Partner

If yes are there specific arrangements that the parties wish to include in the JVA provide these details below:

_________________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

Do the parties propose to sub-licence any part of the Facility

 

£ Yes, the parties propose to appoint a sub-licensee.

P No, the parties do not propose to appoint a sub-licensee.

If yes, describe the proposed arrangement:

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

If yes, do the parties require preparation of a draft sub-licence?

£ Yes                 £ No           £ Not applicable

Are there any other conditions of use to which the parties have agreed or specific arrangements related to use that the parties wish to be reflected in the JVA?

£ No, there are no additional conditions or arrangements                

£ Yes  

If yes, provide details below:

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

Item 19  (2)  HIRE OF THE FACILITY                                                                                       

Which party is responsible for hiring the Facility to community users outside School Hours?  Or will the responsibility for hiring be shared between the parties depending on the area of the Facility involved?

£ School Council responsible for all hiring outside School Hours

P Community Partner responsible for all hiring outside School
    Hours
agreed school usage hours

£ Hire outside School Hours to be shared (describe below)  

Areas the School is responsible for hiring:

__________________________________________________

Areas the Community Partner is responsible for hiring:

__________________________________________________

Is it intended to appoint a third party to manage the hire outside School Hours (that is, the community hire?)

 

£ Yes, the parties propose to appoint a third party to manage
     the hire of the Facility outside School Hours

If yes, identify the proposed third party:

__________________________________________________

P No, the parties do not propose such an arrangement

Is all of the Facility available for community hire outside School Hours or only certain areas?

 

£ All of the Facility is available for hire

P Only some areas are available for community hire (describe
    which areas below)

Indoor Sports Centre, theatres, child care centre and library

__________________________________________________

Will the revenue from hire to the community (that is, hire outside School Hours) belong to one party or be shared?  

 

P Revenue will belong to the Community Partner

£ Revenue will belong to the School Council

Revenue will be shared (describe sharing arrangement
     below)     

Revenue will shared % 

________________________________________________   

£ Revenue paid into Operating Account (as per Section G,
    Option 6)

How will the community hire fees be set?

 

P The party responsible for hire to the community will set the
     fees

£ The hire fees will be set by agreement between the parties
     (add any further comments below
)                       

_PThe fees will be advertised to the community as part of KMC IP&R process

 


 

 

Part F2 - Maintenance

Item 20  (2)  RESPONSIBILITY FOR GENERAL MAINTENANCE                                       

How have the parties agreed to share the maintenance of the Facility? 

Note: Maintenance is assumed to include general repairs, cleaning and security arrangements.  If the parties wish to have a separate specific arrangement in relation to a particular item, such as an electronic security system or computer server or cleaning, this should be detailed on a separate page and attached to this Proposal.

 

 

£ Option 1 - One party is responsible for arranging and paying
    for all maintenance for the Facility with the other party to
    reimburse it an agreed percentage of the costs or pay a fixed
    annual maintenance contribution.

P Option 2 - One party is responsible for arranging and paying
    for all maintenance of the Facility with the other party to
    reimburse it, based on the other party's proportionate
    entitlement to use the Facility.

£ Option 3 - The parties have agreed to be responsible for
    arranging and paying for the maintenance of separate areas
    of the Facility. This Option usually applies where there is
    little or no overlapping use of the different areas of the
    Facility. 

£ Option 4 - The parties have agreed to a Maintenance
    Schedule which sets out their maintenance obligations.

£ Option 5 - One party is responsible for arranging and paying
    for all maintenance for the Facility with no reimbursement.

£ Option 6 - The parties agree to establish an Operating
    Account to collect revenue generated by the Facility and pay
    for maintenance and any other specified operational
    expenses (excluding Capital Expenditure).

 

If the parties have selected Option 1, complete this section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note 1: If the parties select a fixed annual maintenance contribution the default position is for this amount to increase by CPI each year. Alternatively, the parties may specify a different method for this annual increase.

 

Which party is responsible for arranging the maintenance works and paying in the first instance?

£ School Council                    P Community Partner

Will the maintenance costs be reimbursed by the other party as a percentage or a fixed annual maintenance contribution? Select option and provide details.

£ Percentage:              %

£ Fixed annual maintenance contribution:    $___________

If the parties have selected “Fixed annual maintenance contribution”, complete the following:

£ Parties select the default position; or

£ Parties wish to specify own method of annual increase
    (specify below)               

__________________________________________________


Select the arrangements for reimbursement:

Timing for issue of an invoice by the party who paid the costs:

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

£ 6 monthly                          £ Annually

£ Other, specify: ___________________________

Timing for payment of that invoice:

£ 30 days                             £ 45 days

£ 60 days

If the parties have selected Option 2, complete this section.

 

Which party is responsible for arranging the maintenance works and paying in the first instance?

£ School Council                    P Community Partner

Which party will determine how much each party is entitled to use the Facility?  Note:  This is usually the party who owns or manages the land, so for school land it will be the School Council.

£ School Council                    P Community Partner

Select the arrangements for reimbursement:

Timing for issue of an invoice by the party who paid the costs:

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

P 6 monthly                          £ Annually

£ Other, specify: ___________________________

Timing for payment of that invoice by the other party:

£ 30 days                             £ 45 days

£ 60 days

If the parties have selected Option 3, complete this section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If the parties are sharing the costs of maintaining shared areas, e.g. common areas, storage areas, access routes, car-parks, complete this section.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Describe what areas of the Facility will be maintained by each party:

The School Council is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance relating to the following areas:

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

The Community Partner is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance relating to the following areas:

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

£ Not applicable as no areas have shared financial responsibility.                          Move to Section H

In relation to the shared areas, identify who will arrange the maintenance and pay in the first instance:

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

Select the arrangements for reimbursement:

Timing for issue of an invoice by the party who paid the costs:

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

£ 6 monthly                          £ Annually

£ Other, specify: ___________________________

Timing for payment of that invoice:

£ 30 days                             £ 45 days

£ 60 days

Specify the areas of shared financial responsibility:

_________________________________________

_________________________________________

Specify each parties financial contribution:

School Council share (of shared areas):­­­­­­­­­­­_____ %

Community Partner share (of shared areas):______ %

If the parties have selected Option 4, complete this section.

Note: the Maintenance Schedule is to identify which party will arrange for the works and which party will pay for the works; if a proportion of the costs are to be reimbursed by the other party provide these details.

£ Parties confirm they have attached a proposed Maintenance
    Schedule to this Proposal.  If the Facility is located on School
    land, this Schedule is subject to Department approval.

If the parties have selected Option 5, complete this section.

 

Which party is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance for the Facility?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

If the parties have selected Option 6, complete this section.

Note 1:  The Operating Account is not intended to also cover Capital Expenditure.  The parties can establish a separate Capital Reserve Account for this purpose (see Item 22 below).

Note 2: If the Facility is on school land the School Council usually establishes the Operating Account.

Which party will establish the Operating Account?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

Which party is responsible for arranging and paying for all maintenance for the Facility?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

Do the parties intend for the Facility to be self-funding (based on projections that this is feasible) or do the parties propose to contribute to the Operating Account?

£ The parties intend the Facility to be self-funding.

£ The parties intend to contribute to the Operating Account.
    Identify the proposed annual contributions below and any
    specific arrangements for payment:

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

What does the Operating Account cover?

£ The Operating Account covers maintenance (see the Note in

     the first section of this Item 21).

£ The Operating Account also covers the following operating
     expenses (eg. property damage insurance, utilities etc):

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

Parties to confirm that all of the revenue from the community hire of the Facility be paid into the Operating Account.

£ School Council confirms

£ Community Partner confirms

What other funds (if any) are to be paid into the Operating Account?

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

If there is a deficit in the Operating Account, as calculated on an annual basis, how do the parties propose to meet such deficit?

School Council responsibility    __________  %

Community Partner responsibility   __________  %

 

Part G - Expense and Revenue Projections

Item 21   PROJECTED OPERATING COSTS AND REVENUE

Parties to confirm they have calculated the projected costs for the Facility, such as maintenance, Capital Expenditure and the cost of utilities for a five year period.

Note: a copy of the expense projections must be attached to this Proposal

£ Department                   £ Community Partner
    confirms                          confirms

£ Copy of expense projections are attached to this Proposal

Parties to confirm they have calculated the projected revenue for the Facility for a five year period.

Note: a copy of the expense projections must be attached to this Proposal

£ Department                  £ Community Partner
   confirms                           confirms.

£ Copy of revenue projections are attached to this Proposal

 

Part H - Capital Works, Renewal and Capital Expenditure

Item 22    RESPONSIBILITY FOR ARRANGING CAPITAL WORKS                               

Which party is responsible for arranging and paying for the Capital Works for the Facility?

£  Option 1 - One party is responsible for arranging all
    Capital Works in respect of the Facility.

P Option 2 - The parties agree to share responsibility for      arranging Capital Works according to the area of the
      Facility involved.

£ Option 3 - The parties have agreed to identify which of
      them will arrange what Capital Works in a Schedule
.  This
      may be a separate schedule or the parties may combine it
      with a Maintenance and/or Capital Expenditure Schedule

If the parties have selected Option 1, complete this section.

 

The party responsible for arranging the Capital Works will undertake these works based on the Capital Works Plan and in consultation with the other party. The parties however can elect for the party responsible for arranging the Capital Works to obtain written consent prior to the Capital Works being undertaken if the expected cost exceeds an annual limit or a specified amount per item. Parties to advise. 

Which party is responsible for arranging all Capital Works?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

 

Do the parties wish to obtain written consent prior to undertaking Capital Works?

£ Yes                           £ No; if no go to Item 23

If Yes complete the following:

£ Annual Limit                £ Item Limit

If annual limit, specify the amount per annum when consent is required, e.g. annual Capital Works will exceed $40,000

Annual limit: $______________

If consent relates to each item of Capital Works specify this amount, e.g. estimated cost of each item  $ 20,000

Cost per Capital Works item:  $____________

If the parties have selected Option 2, complete this section.

 

Describe how the responsibility for arranging Capital Works will be shared between the parties by reference to the areas of the Facility. 

Areas for which the Department is responsible:

‘Lindfield Learning Village Component’

_________________________________________

Areas for which the Community Partner is responsible:

·      Existing indoor sporting facility (Department)

·      Gym and exercise rooms (Department)

·      Outdoor playing field council owned (Council)

Council meeting rooms attached to the soccer field (Council)

·      Theatres (Department)

Main

Sunken rehearsal space

Small rehearsal

Large rehearsal

Future performing arts practice spaces

·      Future on site child care facility (Department)

·      Future on site Before and After School facilities (Department)

·      Former Library as meeting areas or learning facilities (Department)

·      General meeting spaces (Department)

·      School holiday care facilities (Department)

·      Car parking (Department)

If the parties have selected Option 3, complete this section

 

£ Parties confirm they have attached a proposed
    Capital Works Schedule to this Proposal (or addressed the
    responsibility for Capital Works in a combined Schedule). 

Item 23    RESPONSIBILITY FOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

How have the parties agreed to share Capital Expenditure for the Facility i.e. payment for Capital Works?

Choose from Options 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 as explained in the Instructions.

Note: If the Community Partner is not a local government authority and the Facility is located on School land, the Department requires the parties to use Option 1 - the establishment of a Capital Reserve Account.

 

 

£ Option 1 - The parties have agreed to establish a
      Capital Reserve Account to which they will jointly contribute
      an annual amount towards
the payment of all Capital
      Expenditure in respect of the Facility and which will
      accumulate over time.

POption 2 - One party (Department) is responsible for all Capital Expenditure in respect of the Facility, with Council preparing regular condition reports on joint use facilities, which form part of a review of a 10 year capital works program see item 24.

£ Option 3 - The parties have agreed to share responsibility
      for Capital Expenditure by each contributing an agreed
      percentage of such costs, as and when the costs arise.

£ Option 4 - The parties have agreed to share responsibility       for Capital Expenditure according to the area of the Facility involved.  This Option usually applies where there is little or no overlapping use of the different areas of
     the Facility.  This Option may include some areas of       shared responsibility (such as common areas or whole of
     building costs e.g. replacement of services).

£Option 5 - The parties have agreed to share Capital
      Expenditure as set out in a Schedule.
This may be a
     separate schedule or the parties may combine it with a
     Maintenance and/or Capital Works Schedule (see Items 21
      and 22 above).

 

 

If the parties have selected Option 1, complete this section.

Note 1: The default position for facilities located on School land is a combined annual Capital Reserve Contribution of 1.5% of the total cost of the works (see Item 7) during the Initial Term of the Agreement, increasing to 2% of the total cost of the works during the Further Term. The parties need to agree how much they will each contribute towards this annual contribution. Default contribution position is parties to contribute equally, that is, 50% of 1.5% (or 2%) as the case may be. 

 

 

Note 2: Alternatively, should the parties wish to design their own schedule of contributions to the Capital Reserve Account, they must provide their Capital Works projections to demonstrate the adequacy of the proposed contributions.

 

 

 

Which party will establish and maintain the Capital Reserve Account?

£ School Council                £ Community Partner

How much do the parties propose to contribute annually to the Capital Reserve, starting from 12 months after the Facility commences operation?

£ Parties select the default position

If parties wish to contribute a different percentage than the default contribution position, that is, 50% each, please specify percentage:

School Council contribution:   _____________    %

Community Partner contribution:  _____________    %

 or

£ Parties wish to design their own schedule of contributions
    (specify below or attach as a separate document)               

School Council contribution:  $

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

Community Partner contribution: $                                 

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

 

£ If the parties have chosen to design their own schedule of
    contributions, attach a copy of the parties' Capital Works
    projections to this Proposal.

How will the School Council and Community Partner fund any deficit in the Capital Reserve Account?

School Council ________%    Community Partner ________%

 

If the parties have selected Option 2, complete this section.

 

Which party is responsible for paying for all Capital Expenditure?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

 

If the parties have selected Option 3, complete this section.

 

Which party is responsible for payment of Capital Expenditure in the first instance?

£ School Council                    £ Community Partner

What percentage will be reimbursed by the other party?

____________ %

Select the arrangements for reimbursement:

Timing for issue of an invoice by the party who paid the costs:

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

£ 6 monthly                          £ Annually

£ Other, specify: ___________________________

Timing for payment of that invoice:

£ 30 days                             £ 45 days

£ 60 days

If the parties have selected Option 4, complete this section.

 

Describe how Capital Expenditure will be shared between the parties by reference to the areas of the Facility. 

Areas for which the School Council is responsible: _________________________________________

_________________________________________

Areas for which the Community Partner is responsible:
_________________________________________

_________________________________________

Areas of shared responsibility (if any):
_________________________________________

_________________________________________

School Council share (of shared areas):­­­­­­­­­­­_____ %

Community Partner share (of shared areas):______ %

 

If the parties have selected Option 5, complete this section.

 

£ Parties confirm they have attached a proposed Schedule to
      this Proposal.  The parties may provide a combined
      Maintenance, Capital Works and Capital Expenditure
      Schedule.

 

Item 24    CAPITAL WORKS PLANS

Parties confirm they agree to generate, and update annually, rolling 10 year Capital Works plans for the Facility.

P Department agrees      P Community Partner agrees                                     

Part I - Utilities and Telecommunications

Item 25    UTILITIES SUPPLIED TO THE FACILITY AND METERING ARRANGEMENTS

What utilities are supplied to the Facility?

What supplied utilities will be separately metered?

 

 

£ There are no utilities supplied to the Facility. 

    Go to Item 29

P Water

If supplied, will water be metered separately:

P Yes      £ No

P Electricity

If supplied, will electricity be metered separately:

P Yes      £ No

£ Gas

If supplied, will gas be metered separately:

£ Yes      £ No

Insert any additional specific details about metering arrangements here:

________________________________________

Item 26    ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS

School Council and Community Partner to confirm their additional financial obligations in relation to the operation of the Facility.

 

The Department and the Community Partner are each responsible for the cost of employing staff and engaging contractors and any other costs or expenses in relation to their use of the Facility and the performance of their obligations in respect of the Facility but are cost neutral to Council and can be subject to specific agreements on access to specialist skills such as theatre technicians

P Department confirms

P Community Partner confirms

The Community Partner confirms it is responsible for any Statutory Charges payable in respect of the Community Partner's use or occupation of the Facility.  Note: The School Council is not required to pay any Statutory charges in respect of its use of the Facility for the purposes of the School, but such charges would hypothecated to each partner on the use of the identified facilities annually.

P Community Partner confirms

The School Council and the Community Partner are each responsible for the cost of any service call outs in relation to the security or fire safety of the Facility, if the call out was required due to their act of an act of their Personnel or users.

P School Council confirms

P Community Partner confirms

Section J     Consultation between the Parties

Item 27   CONSULTATION MODEL

The parties are to meet on a regular basis during the Licence Term and each party will appoint an authorised representative. Default position for timing of meetings is every 6 months unless the parties specify otherwise.

 

The parties can also elect to establish an Advisory Group

£ School Council confirms                                          

£ Community Partner confirms                                          

Frequency of meetings:

£ Parties select the default position; or

PParties wish to specify their own frequency:

_____________________                               

 

Do the parties wish to establish an Advisory Group

P Yes                                 £ No

If yes select desired frequency of Advisory Group meetings.

£ Monthly                             £ Quarterly

£ 6 monthly                          POther (please specify)

                                                Monthly for the first 6 months then reviewed by agreement

Section K     Final Checklist   

PARTIES TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CHECKLIST

1        Was department planning endorsement for the proposed Facility obtained

£ Yes                           

2        Is a plan of the Land attached unless the Facility is to be located on School land owned or managed by the Department?

£ Yes                           
£ Not Applicable

3        Are the concept plans for the Facility attached?

£ Yes                           

4        Have the parties completed and attached the projected revenue and operating expenses for the Facility?

£ Yes                           

5        Are the maintenance and capital works schedule(s) attached? This is only applicable if Option 4 in Item 21 or if Option 3 in Item 22 above was selected.

£ Not applicable

£ Maintenance

£ Capital Works

£ Combined

6        Do the parties acknowledge that, if the Facility is to be located on School land, they must first obtain the written approval of the Department before tendering for the construction or development of the works or entering into the Building Contract?

£ School Council acknowledges                                          

£ Community Partner acknowledges                                          

                    


 

 

SIGNATORIES TO THIS PROPOSAL

We understand that the purpose of this Community Joint Venture Proposal is to provide key information about the proposed community joint use arrangement and to outline the basis on which the parties propose to enter into a legally binding Community Joint Venture Agreement with the Minister. 

We understand that this Proposal is a proposal by the parties only.  It is neither intended to be nor is a legally binding agreement and it is subject to the Minister's approval.

_______________________

Signature of School Principal

_______________________

Name of School Principal

Date: ______________________                                  

_______________________

  Signature of Community Partner

_______________________

  Name of Community Partner

Date: ______________________

For Department Use Only

Agreement Type (complexity)

 

Responsible Project Officer

 

Other Comments

 

 

 

 


Ordinary Meeting of Council - 10 May 2016

GB.7 / 263

 

 

Item GB.7

S10668

 

18 April 2016

 

 

Tender 13/2015 and Tender 02/2016
Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street
Drainage construction work

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider tenders received for the construction of stormwater drainage works in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street, Roseville and appoint the preferred tenderer

 

 

background:

In February 2010, Ku-ring-gai local government area experienced heavy rainfall resulting in flooding of residential properties. Council engaged consultants to investigate and prepare design drawings for major stormwater works to mitigate these impacts. Tenders were called for the construction of drainage infrastructure works in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Avenue, Roseville.

 

 

comments:

Tenders were required to be called twice as only one submission was received for each.  The price exceeded Council’s available funds. Therefore, no further evaluation by the Tender Evaluation Committee was done for each submission.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council reject the tender submitted for the construction of the stormwater drainage in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street, Roseville.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To consider tenders received for the construction of stormwater drainage works in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street, Roseville and appoint the preferred tenderer

 

Background

 

In February 2010, Ku-ring-gai local government area experienced heavy rainfall resulting in flooding of residential properties in Oliver Road. Council engaged consultants to investigate and prepare design drawings for major stormwater works to mitigate these impacts.

 

Open tenders were called via Tenderlink for the drainage construction of stormwater in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street, Roseville. Advertisements were place in print media as required by the Procurement Policy.

 

Tenderlink was used for managing the operation of the tender

 

Tenders were initially called on 24 November 2015 for RFT 13/2015, and closed on 5 January 2016. Five (5) companies downloaded the documentation but only one submission was received.

 

The Evaluation Committee considered the lack of submissions was a factor due to the advertising period being over the Christmas public holiday time and that the construction industry is usually closed. It was agreed to readvertise the Tender.

 

The timing was made to expedite the procurement and subsequent construction aiming to achieve significant progress within the 2015/16 financial year.

 

Tenders were again called on 2 February 2016 for RFT 02/2016, and closed 1 March 2016. Five (5) companies downloaded the documentation but only one submission was received.

 

Comments

 

Tender Evaluation

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel (EP) was established from Operations and Strategy staff. The process was overseen by the Manager Procurement and Contracts.

 

Information indicating the price offered in each Tender submission, budget and evaluation are contained in the confidential Tender Evaluation Report (Attachment  A1).

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(c) of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(c) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public in respect of information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.

 

Given that one firm downloaded twice, it is considered appropriate to refund one fee on a without prejudice basis for paying fees twice if council resolves to reject tenders.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P8.1 An improved standard of infrastructure that meets the community’s service level standards and Council’s obligations as the custodian of our community assets

 

Programs for infrastructure and asset maintenance management are delivered in accordance with the adopted Asset Management Strategy and Plans.

 

Deliver annual capital works program on time and within budget.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Each tender has been assessed by an Evaluation Committee including an independent member to ensure the procurement process is adhered to and meets with value for money outcomes and matters associated with probity and formal procurement.

 

Risk Management

 

The design involves construction complexity and risk to utility infrastructure.

 

Council’s proposed stormwater is designed to span over a 1.2 metre diameter Sydney Water main with minimum clearance in Trafalgar Street.

 

Excavation along Oliver Street adjoins timber power poles requiring support during construction. 

 

All design, construction and operational risks, have been consulted extensively with Sydney Water and Ausgrid. 

 

Financial Considerations

 

Funding has been allocated from the 2015-2016 Capital Works program under the Delivery Program and Operational Plan. However, sufficient funds were not available to cover the costs associated with the one tender. A redesign is now proposed to reduce the costs associated with the original design. The major costs are associated with utility adjustments and the redesign will examine ways of overcoming the water main adjustment.

 

Social Considerations

 

The project aims to provide new infrastructure that will result in improved flood mitigation outcomes for affected residents.  Utilities affected by this proposal have been identified and consulted, with design requirements from Sydney Water, Agility (gas), and Ausgrid factored into the plans.

 

During planned construction, access to private property is to be maintained at all times.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Construction and projects works are to be contained fully in the road reserve area, and are not considered to have any significant noise impact on the environment.

 

Hours of operation will be consistent with hours consented for developments.

 

Where available, aggregate material is to be delivered and stockpiled in 1 tonne bags for ease of handling and storage.

 

Community Consultation

 

Stakeholder consultation has been conducted with Utilities and residences involving design for protection of infrastructure and access requirements respectively.

 

Residents will be advised of the starting date for the construction and duration, based upon submitted information and program.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Consultation has taken place with staff from across Operations and Corporate Departments with regards to design, integration with roads capital works and probity.

 

Summary

 

Due to the absence of piped infrastructure to control gutter flows, an engineering consultant was engaged to design stormwater infrastructure to convey overland runoff and to mitigate flooding in Oliver Road.

 

Design plans and documentation were prepared and Tender RFT13/2015 was advertised on 24 November 2015 and closed on 5 January 2016. One submission was received.  The result was unsatisfactory in price and competitive bids.

 

Tender RFT2/2016 was advertised on 2 February 2016 and closed on 1 March 2016. One submission was received. The result was unsatisfactory in price and competitive bids.

 

In both submissions, the tenderer submitted lump sum price exceeding Council’s available funds.  No further evaluation was taken place in respect of the submission, as per the Conditions of Tendering, under Price (1.6.1).

 

Consequently, a redesign of the drainage proposal is required to reduce construction costs. The redesign will examine options to overcome the utility adjustment. Funding will be carried forward to next financial year to allow for the works to be done next financial year.

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.      That Council reject the tender submitted for the construction of the stormwater drainage in Oliver Road and Trafalgar Street, Roseville.

 

B.     That the Tenderer be formally advised of Council’s decision

 

C.     That Council’s decision be placed on Council’s web site and notices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ian Taylor

Manager Engineering Operations

 

 

 

 

Greg Piconi

Director Operations

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Tender Evaluation Report

 

Confidential