Ordinary Meeting of Council

TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 7 February 2017 AT 7:00 pm

Level 3, Council Chamber

 

Agenda

** ** ** ** ** **

 

 

NOTE:  For Full Details, See Council’s Website –

www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers

 

 

APOLOGIEs

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

 

Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting

 

NOTE:

 

That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:

 

GB.9    Turramurra Community Hub Masterplan and Rezoning & Reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra

Attachment A6: ................................................................ Legal Advice  

In accordance with s10A(2)(g)

GB.11  Tender T06/2016 - NTRA Sportsfield Car Park and Landscape Works

Attachment A1: ................................................. List of Tenders received

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A2: ....................... Tender Evaluation Panel's recommendation

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A3:       Corporate Scorecard Assessments

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

 

 

 

Address the Council

NOTE:           Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.

 

 

Documents Circulated to Councillors

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council                                                                         8

 

File: S02131

Meeting held 6 December 2016

Minutes numbered 320 to 344

 

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

MM.1        2017 Australia Day Honours and Citizen of the Year Awards                                54

 

File: S07765/8

 

I am pleased to inform you that 12 Ku-ring-gai citizens, through their outstanding achievements and services to the community, have been awarded 2017 Australia Day Honours.

 

We are very proud to have these dedicated and talented Australians as members of the Ku-ring-gai community.

 

I would like to read to you the names of these special Ku-ring-gai citizens and, on behalf of Council, congratulate them on their excellent contributions to Australian society.

 

David Timothy CHEN  OAM  of Killara, for service to medicine, and to professional associations

 

Michael John McEWEN  OAM  of St Ives, for service to the community through a range of organisations

 

Helen Elaine MILLER  OAM  of Turramurra, for service to veterans and their families

 

Yair Phillip MILLER  OAM  of St Ives, for service to the community through a range of organisations, and to interfaith relations

 

Susan Lesley NURSE  OAM  of Pymble, for service to the Uniting Church in Australia

 

Geoffrey Thomas PAINTER  AM  of Warrawee, for significant service to medicine in the field of ophthalmology, and to international relations, particularly to eye health in Asia and he Pacific

 

Richard John SCHLOEFFEL  OAM  of Gordon, for service to medicine in the field of chronic and infectious disease

 

Owen Bruce SLEE  AM  Late of Turramurra, for significant service to science, particularly in the field of radio astronomy, as a researcher, author and mentor of young scientists

 

Patricia Whitmore SPOONER  OAM  of North Turramurra, for service to the community through volunteer roles

 

Tiffany THOMAS KANE  OAM  of Killara, for service to sport as a gold medallist at the Rio 2016 Paralympic Games

 

Pamela Joy WALKER  OAM  of Pymble, for service to the Uniting Church in Australia, and to pastoral care programs

 

Adrian Anthony UNGER  OAM  of East Lindfield, for service to people with Parkinson’s disease

 

I also congratulate Ku-ring-gai’s Citizen of the Year winners for 2017:

 

Citizen of the Year       

-   Dr Zeny Edwards

Young Citizen of the Year

-   David Taylor

Outstanding Service to the Community

(Individual)                  

-   Helen Wortham

Outstanding Service to the Community

(Group)         

-   WW1 Writers’ Group

 

On behalf of Council, I congratulate all these award winners on their outstanding achievements.

 

Ku-ring-gai should be proud that it has so many citizens being recognised at the highest level for their selfless dedication, commitment and contribution to local, national and international communities.

 

 

Petitions

 

PT.1         Request for Concrete Footpath on
Junction Road Wahroonga                                                                                            
56

 

File: 88/05589/01

 

“We, the undersigned, request the Mayor and Councillors of Ku-ring-gai to consider building a concrete sidewalk on Junction Road, Wahroonga – specifically from 105 Junction Road to 33 Junction Road (Junction Road and Grosvenor Street) during the next year. (Thirty Five [35] Signatures)

 

We do not know why the Council has not built a sidewalk on our side of Junction Road, as this is a busy street with cars driving by on an ongoing basis, with bus stops, and with senior housing next to our house. We can think of a number of reasons why building a sidewalk is important, our top five reasons are:

 

1.   Sidewalks provide a safe and level walkway – especially during wet weather and for people using wheelchairs, the elderly, or people pushing a cart of stroller.

2.   Sidewalks provide safe places for children to walk from and to schools and school bus stops.

3.   Sidewalks improve the ability for people to get around by providing ways for them to get wherever they need to go: work, parks, schools, shopping areas, transit stops, and home without using cars (sidewalks benefits less traffic and reduced noise).

4.   Sidewalks enhance the appearance of individual properties, neighbourhoods, and the entire community.

5.   Sidewalks help protect property frontage from damage due to erosion and parking.

 

Of course, walking is the most democratic way to get around. It is the oldest mode of transport, it’s free, and it may even help us burn a few calories. We hope the Council supports our desire to shift back to pedestrian – friendly streets. We firmly believe enhancing the quality of sidewalks not only attracts more pedestrians, but also helps to enjoy public spaces more where people want to spend time outdoors.”

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

i.               The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.

 

ii.             The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.

 

 

GB.1        Investment Report as at 30 November 2016                                                               57

 

File: S05273

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for November 2016.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the summary of investments performance for November 2016 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

GB.2        Review of Council's Investment Policy                                                                        66

 

File: S05273

 

To review and adopt Council's revised Investment Policy.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the attached revised Investment Policy, endorsed by the Audit & Risk Committee, be adopted by Council.

 

GB.3        Investment Report as at 31 December 2016                                                               84

 

File: S05273

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for December 2016.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the summary of investments performance for December 2016 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

GB.4        Business Approved under Authority Delegated to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager for the Christmas/New Year recess period 2016/2017            94

 

File: CY00259/9

 

To inform Councillors of any business approved under delegated authority during the 2016/17 recess period.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

GB.5        Election of Council Representative on
Ku-ring-gai Youth Development Service (KYDS) Committee                              
100

 

File: S03662

 

To advise Council of the resignation of Councillor Citer as Council’s representative on the KYDS Management Committee, and seek a resolution regarding the appointment of a new representative and alternate representative.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council appoints its representative and alternate representative on the KYDS Management Committee.

 

GB.6        2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference: Building Liveable, Walkable, Sustainable Communities                                                                                             103

 

File: FY00581/2

 

To advise Council of the 2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference.

 

Recommendation:

 

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference advise the General Manager by Friday, 24 February 2017.

 

GB.7        1 Milray Street and 12 - 14 Kochia Lane Lindfield - Demolition of existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development consisting of 16 townhouses, basement parking, landscaping works and amalgamation of three lots into one 111

 

File: DA0158/16

 

Ward: Roseville

Applicant: Urbanesque Planning Pty Ltd

Owner: Rudder Development One Pty Ltd

 

Demolition of existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development consisting of 16 townhouses, basement parking, landscaping works and amalgamation of three lots into one

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval

 

GB.8        Planning Proposal - Rezoning 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara                                      189

 

File: S11257

 

For Council to consider a Planning Proposal for 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the Planning Proposal be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination.

 

GB.9        Turramurra Community Hub Masterplan and Rezoning & Reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra                                                                                        279

 

File: S09969

 

For Council to consider the feedback following the public hearing for the Planning Proposal to rezone and reclassify Council owned land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra and for Council to adopt the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan.

 

Recommendation:

 

This report recommends that the land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra be rezoned and reclassified and that the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan, as described in this report, be adopted.

 

GB.10      Fitzsimons Lane Gordon - Draft Voluntary Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon - Post Exhibition Report                                                                385

 

File: S10147

 

To report back following the exhibition of the Draft Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council resolves to enter into the Planning Agreement with WN Developments Pty Ltd as specified within the attached document to facilitate the dedication of land for the purposes of widening Fitzsimons Lane Gordon and delegation be granted to the General Manager and Mayor to execute the Planning Agreement, under Common Seal.

 

GB.11      Tender T06/2016 - NTRA Sportsfield Car Park and Landscape Works             417

 

File: S10894/2

 

To consider the tenders received for the construction of NTRA Sportsfield Car Park and Landscape works and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Recommendation:

 

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended that Council accept the tender submitted by Tenderer ‘A’.

 

GB.12      Council Sponsorship -Turramurra Rotary Graffiti Removal Program 2016/2017 423

 

File: S05650

 

To seek Council’s endorsement to provide additional funding to Turramurra Rotary for the cleaning of graffiti from business and private property in the Turramurra and St Ives area.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council approve the request from Turramurra Rotary for $5,000 with funds to be provided from the Building Maintenance Recurrent Budget.

 

Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting

 

BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS

 

Questions Without Notice

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

** ** ** ** ** **


Minute                                           Ku-ring-gai Council                                               Page

MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 6 December 2016

 

Present:

The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson (Chairperson)

Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward)

Councillors C Szatow & D Citer (Gordon Ward)

Councillors C Berlioz & D Ossip (St Ives Ward)

Councillor D Armstrong (Roseville Ward)

Councillors C Fornari-Orsmond & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward)

 

 

Staff Present:

General Manager (John McKee)

Director Corporate (David Marshall)

Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic)

Director Operations (Greg Piconi)

Acting Director Strategy & Environment (Antony Fabbro)

Director Community (Janice Bevan)

Corporate Lawyer (Jamie Taylor)

Manager Strategic Projects (Ian Dreghorn)

Manager Corporate Communications (Virginia Leafe)

Manager Records and Governance (Amber Moloney)

Team Leader Urban Design (Bill Royal)

Strategic Traffic Engineer (Joseph Piccoli)

Contract Urban Designer (Louise Drum)

Principal Landscape Architect (Alison Walker)

Minutes Secretary (Christine Dunand)

 

 

The Meeting commenced at 7:00 pm

 

The Mayor offered the Prayer

 

 

Apologies

 

The General Manager advised that Director  Strategy and Environment Andrew Watson is unwell and Mr Fabbro will be Acting Director Strategy and Environment.

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.

 

The Mayor, Councillor Anderson declared a conflict of interest in item GB.13  Turramurra Local Centre - Traffic and Transport Study, as she has recently moved to rental premises in Turramurra Avenue, and advised she would leave the Chamber during the debate.

 

Councillor Berlioz arrived

The General Manager advised staff declarations of interest in item C.1 2017 General Manager's Performance Agreement - Monitoring Review and advised that the General Manager and staff would leave the Chamber during the debate.

 

 

319

CONFIRMATION OF REPORTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CLOSED MEETING

 

File: S02499/9

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/McDonald)

 

That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of:

 

A.      That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act , all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential reports and respective attachments:

 

C.1     2017 General Manager's Performance Agreement - Monitoring Review

         In accordance with 10A(2)(a)

 

B.      That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act , all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business Reports:

 

GB.7  Tender RFT11/2016 - Printer and Multifunction Device Replacement

Attachment A1:  Evaluation Committee Report

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A2:  Evaluation Worksheet - All Submissions

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A3:  Evaluation Worksheet - Shortlisted Submissions

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

 

GB.9  Tender RFT14/2016 - Drainage Construction at 90 Babbage Road, Roseville Chase

Attachment A1: Tender Evaluation Panel Summary

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A2: Financial Considerations Summary

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A3: Tenderer A - Corporate Scorecard

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A4: Tenderer B - Corporate Scorecard

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A5: Valuation Report 1

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A6: Valuation Report 2

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A7: Valuation Report 3  

In accordance with s10A(2)(d)(iii)

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Address the Council

 

The following member(s) of the public address Council on items not on the agenda:

 

E Gross                                Request for Enforcement Action

J Harwood                           Identity in the 21st Century

 

 

DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS

 

The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:

 

Memorandums:

GB.1 St Ives Showground New Inclusive Playground and Golden Grove Inclusive Playground Upgrade

Memorandum from Acting Director Strategy & Environment dated 29 November 2016 advising a full sized set of all attachments to this reports are available in the Councillors’ room.

Late Councillors Information:

GB.13 Turramurra Local Centre - Traffic and Transport Study

Memorandum from Acting Director Strategy and Environment dated 6 December 2016 answering Councillor questions regarding the Turramurra Local Centre - Traffic and Transport Study

 

 


 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

320

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

File: S02131

 

 

Meeting held 22 November 2016

Minutes numbered 303 to 318

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

That Minutes numbered 303 to 318 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

321

St Ives Showground New Inclusive Playground and Golden Grove Inclusive Playground Upgrade

 

File: S02621

Vide: GB.1

 

 

To seek Council's endorsement of the final concept designs for the inclusive playgrounds at Council’s Regional Parks - St Ives Showground at Picnic Area 7 and at Ku-ring-gai Bicentennial Park at Golden Grove and proceed to document for tender.

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)

 

A.   That Council endorses the final concept designs for the new upgraded inclusive playgrounds in St Ives Showground in Picnic Area 7, and in Ku-ring-gai Bicentennial Park at Golden Grove.

 

B.   That design and construction documentation, including detailed plans, cost estimates, environmental assessment and specifications for both projects based on the final concept designs, be completed for public tender.

 

C.   That Council authorises the General Manager to allow minor changes to the concept plans during the design development process where budget or other constraints warrant amendments.

 

D.   That the specialised custom built play equipment items listed in the report be authorised for pre-order by the General Manager to ensure the long lead time does not delay the project implementation.

 

E.   That any increased maintenance costs associated with the new regional playground upgrades be included in the draft 2017/18 recurrent budget.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

322

Code of Conduct - Complaint Statistics

 

File: S08447

Vide: GB.2

 

 

To report statistics in relation to complaints as required by the Procedures for the Administration of the Model Code of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW  for the twelve months to 31 August 2016.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)

 

That the report pursuant to Part 12 of the Procedures for the Administration of the Model Code of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW  be received and noted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

323

Draft Media and Communications Policy

 

File: S07349

Vide: GB.3

 

 

For Council to adopt the draft Media and Communications Community Policy 2016.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)

 

That Council adopt the draft Media and Communications Policy 2016.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

324

St Ives Precinct - Temporary Markets

 

File: S10920

Vide: GB.4

 

 

To advise Council of a temporary booking for Anatevka Pty Ltd to conduct monthly Sunday markets at the St. Ives Precinct, for a12 month trial period.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Pettett)

 

That Council receive and note this report.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

325

Draft Community Consultation Policy

 

File: S02090

Vide: GB.5

 

 

For Council to adopt the draft Community Consultation Policy 2016.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)

 

That Council adopt the draft Community Consultation Policy 2016.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

326

Tender RFT11/2016 - Printer and Multifunction Device Replacement

 

File: S11009

Vide: GB.7

 

 

To report on the results of the open tender for the supply and installation of printers, multifunction devices and a print management solution and to seek approval to accept the tender from the preferred tenderer.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)

 

A.   That Council approve the recommendation of the Tender Evaluation Committee included in attachment A1.

B.   That Council authorises the Mayor and General Manager to execute all documents and affix the Council seal to all contract documents.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

327

Ku-ring-gai Bush fire prone land map 2016 - finalisation

 

File: S10627

Vide: GB.11

 

 

For Council to adopt the exhibited 2016 Ku-ring-gai Bush Fire Prone Land Map (BFPLM) which was placed on public exhibition between 24 June 2016 and 21 July 2016, with amendments as outlined in this report, for lodgement to the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service for certification.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Berlioz)

 

That Council endorses the final 2016 Ku-ring-gai 2016 Bush Fire Prone Land Map, with amendments as outlined in this report, for lodgement to the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service for certification.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

328

Fitzsimons Lane Gordon - Voluntary Planning Agreements

 

File: S10147

Vide: GB.14

 

 

To provide an update on the progress of the draft Planning Agreements for the Development Applications that front both the Pacific Highway and Fitzsimons Lane Gordon – the lane frontage being subject to a land dedication for widening.  This report also recommends the statutory exhibition of one of the draft Planning Agreements.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Pettett)

 

A.   That public notice of the exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement and Explanatory Note relating to the property at 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon for the purposes of facilitating a land dedication along the frontage to Fitzsimons Lane be duly given, and a copy of those documents be made available for inspection, in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

B.   That a report be brought back to Council following the statutory exhibition process.

 

C.   That delegation be granted to the General Manager or his delegate to make any administrative changes to the document that do not alter the overall intent in order to facilitate exhibition and to protect Council’s interests.

 

D.   That the letter of offer to enter into a planning agreement for the dedication of land along the frontage to Fitzsimons Lane of the property located at 900 Pacific Highway Gordon in association with DA0226/16 be noted and authority be delegated to the General Manager or his delegate to progress the draft planning agreement in discussions with the applicant.

 

E.   That the design process for the Fitzsimons Lane public domain improvements commence as soon as practicable in 2017.

 

F.   That the General Manager or his delegate to authorised to proactively pursue the completion of the negotiations for the draft planning agreement for the remaining property at 870-898 Pacific Highway which also has rear frontage to Fitzsimons Lane which has recently been on-sold, in line with the original letters of offer from the former property owner, with a view to enabling the public domain works to Fitzsimons Lane to be delivered concurrently and in the short term.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

329

Potential Heritage Conservation Areas in Pymble, Turramurra and Wahroonga

 

File: S10051

Vide: GB.15

 

 

To have Council consider potential heritage conservation areas for inclusion under the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 and the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Berlioz)

 

A.       That a Planning Proposal be prepared in accordance with s55 of the EP&A Act to amend KLEP 2015 and KLEP (Local Centres) 2012 to include several proposed conservation areas as potential heritage conservation areas in Schedule 5 and on the Heritage Map.

 

B.       That the Planning Proposal be forwarded to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination in accordance with the provisions of the EP&A Act and Regulations.

 

C.       That in order to facilitate an expedient Gateway Determination, the NSW Heritage Office be consulted prior to submitting the Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment. Should comments not be received within 21 days, the Planning Proposal is to be submitted regardless.

 

D.       That Council requests the plan making delegation under Section 23 of the EP&A Act for this Planning Proposal.

 

 E.      That upon receipt of a Gateway Determination, the exhibition and consultation process is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 and with the Gateway Determination requirements.

 

F.       A further report be brought back to Council at the end of the exhibition period.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

330

Extinguishment/modification of Council Easement - 29, 29A and 31 Moree Street Gordon

 

File: CY00066/8

Vide: GB.16

 

 

To consider a request for the extinguishment/modification of an existing stormwater drainage easement over Lot 2 DP 212930 and Lots 1 and 2 DP 846768, being 29, 29A and 31 Moree Street benefiting Council and the creation of a new easement in an alternate location on the land.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Citer)

 

A.   That the General Manager or his delegate be authorised to negotiate Council’s requirements including compensation for the relocation of the existing easement that benefits Council over Lot 2 DP 212930 and Lots 1 and 2 DP 846768 (29, 29A and 31 Moree Street Gordon) and the creation of a new easement on another part of the property approved by Council.

 

B.   Subject to the General Manager or his delegate completing negotiations strictly on the  basis set out in this report that Council grant approval for the extinguishment of the existing easement and creation of the new easement on the development site in accordance with Council’s requirements and the future Development Consent.

 

C.   That Council authorises the Mayor and General Manager to affix the Common Seal of the Council to the instrument for the release of the easement and the creation of a new easement and execute all associated documentation.

 

D.   That all costs associated with the extinguishment of part of the existing easement and the creation of a new easement in favour of Council, including legal and survey costs and all costs associated with the new drainage works be borne by the Developer.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

331

Medium Density Housing Code Exhibition - Submission to Department of Planning and Environment

 

File: S10990

Vide: GB.17

 

 

To present to Council the assessment and submission on the Explanation of Intended Effect - Medium Density Housing Code and Draft Medium Density Design Guide exhibited by the Department of Planning and Environment.

 

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Berlioz)

 

A.   That Council endorse the content of the submission and it be submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment.

 

B.   That Council authorise the Director Strategy and Environment to amend Council’s submission to improve clarity and strengthen arguments prior to its issue.

 

C.   That Council forward its final submission to interested State agencies and individuals to engage them in the proposed directions for medium density housing.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

332

2017 General Manager's Performance Agreement - Monitoring Review

 

File: CY00254/9

Vide: C.1

 

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(a), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(a) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than Councillors).

 

Report by Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson dated 28 November 2016

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald )

 

A.   That Council receive and accept the report.

B.   That the General Manager be officially advised by the Mayor of the outcome of the Performance Review.

C.   That the General Manager and his staff be commended for their good work.

D.   That Council continue the facilitation contract with Ptok Consulting Pty Ltd as outlined in Attachment 2.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion

Councillor Ossip returned

 

Standing Orders were suspended to deal with items
where there are speakers first after a
Motion moved by Councillors Armstrong and McDonald
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

333

Save Marian Street Theatre Group - Business Plan

 

File: S10577

Vide: GB.6

 

 

To present to Council a Business Plan prepared by the Save Marian Street Theatre Group.

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this matter:

 

J Townend

J Cadden

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Malicki)

 

A.      That Council engage an independent consultant to conduct a Probity and Risk Review of the Save Marian Street Theatre Business Plan.

B.      That a report come to Council containing analysis of the SMS Business Plan along with recommendations and strategies from the independent Probity and Risk Review.

C.      That the Probity report come back to Council by the end of February 2017.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , Citer, McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Berlioz, Szatow, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillor Armstrong

 

The above Resolution was CARRIED as an Amendment to the Original Motion.

 

For the Amendment:             The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Berlioz, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Amendment:       Councillors Citer, Armstrong and Szatow

 

 

 

 

The Original Motion was:

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Citer)

 

A.      That Council engage an independent consultant to conduct a Probity and Risk Review of the Save Marian Street Theatre Business Plan.

B.     That a report come to Council containing analysis of the SMS Business Plan along with recommendations and strategies from the independent Probity and Risk Review.

C.     That Council approve $36,500 seed funding to the Save Marian Street Theatre Committee in order that they can continue with a feasibility study at the same time as Council's undertaking of a Probity and Risk Review of their Business Plan.

 

During debate Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/McDonald moved that the Motion be PUT as there had been 2 speakers For and 2 Against.

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Berlioz, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Citer, Armstrong and Szatow

 

 

 

334

24 Mungarra Avenue, St Ives - demolition of existing structures and construction of 3 seniors living dwellings and associated works

 

File: DA0572/15

Vide: GB.8

 

 

Demolition of existing structures and construction of 3 seniors living dwellings and associated works

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this matter:

 

K Kennedy

G Holdsworth

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Pettett)

 

That Council, as the consent authority, grant development consent to DA0572/15 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of 3 seniors living dwellings and associated works on land at 24 Mungarra Avenue, St Ives for a period of two (2) years from the date of the Notice of Determination, subject to the following conditions:

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

02/21 – 12/21 (Revision J)

JS Architects Pty Ltd

08/11/16

Stormwater drainage layout plan (Issue C)

VNK Consulting

29/05/16

 

Document(s)

Dated

Exterior Finishes Schedule (JS Architects Pty Ltd)

9 December 2015

Basix certificate No. 570459M_04

27 September 2016

Access report, Revision B (Ergon Consulting)

2 December 2015

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Alfresco areas (Dwellings 24 and 24A) - roofs to be deleted

 

The roof structures over the proposed alfresco areas to Dwellings 24 and 24A are to be deleted.

 

Reason:       To improve solar access.

 

3.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

5.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

7.     Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·        Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Mungarra Avenue over the site frontage,

·        All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:              A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

8.     Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for the longest heavy rigid vehicle.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·     Demolition

·     Excavation

·     Concrete pour

·     Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·     Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.

 

When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:       To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

9.     Work zone

 

A works zone is required along the site frontage. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.

 

If the work zone is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.

 

Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.

 

In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.

 

Reason:         To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.

 

10.   Erosion and drainage management

 

Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.  The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

11.   Marking of trees to be removed

 

All trees that are to be removed within the development area, are to be clearly marked on site by the Project Arborist in accordance with the approved plans. All other trees are to be retained.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

12.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

Tree 8/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

This tree is located at the south-west corner of the site, within the adjoining property

3.5m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

13.   Tree protection fencing excluding structure

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy excluding that area of the approved driveway shall be fenced off for the specified radius from the trunk to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site:

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

Tree 1/ Populus deltoides (Cottonwood)

This tree is located on the nature reserve on Mungarra Avenue

9.8m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

14.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

15.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone.

 

·        This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·        Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report.

·        The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

·        The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council.

·        The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

16.   Tree protection - avoiding soil compaction

 

To preserve the following tree/s and avoid soil compaction, no work shall commence until temporary measures to avoid soil compaction beneath the canopy of the following tree/s is/are installed:

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Tree 2/ Quercus palustris (Pin Oak)

This tree is located at the north-east corner of the site, within the adjoining property 

Tree 3/ Melaleuca quinquenervia (Broad Leaved Paperbark)

This tree is located at the south-east corner of the site, within the adjoining property

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

17.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

18.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:              The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

19.   Amendments to approved landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Date

10/21 (Revision J)

JS Architects Pty Ltd

08/11/16

 

The following changes are required to the Landscape Plan:

 

1.         An additional canopy tree is to be planted forward of Dwelling 24 and an additional canopy tree is to be planted adjacent to the mail box.

 

2.         The correct width of the existing rock batter located along the front boundary is to be shown with proposed planting along the upper edge.

 

3.         To provide neighbour amenity, all retaining walls to side boundaries are be set back a minimum of 600mm (to inside edge of wall) with adequate screen planting provision therein.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.

 

Note:    An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

 

20.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

21.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

22.   Outdoor lighting

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Note:              Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse effects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.

 

23.   Air drying facilities

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.

 

In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Amenity & energy efficiency.

 

24.   External service pipes and the like prohibited

 

Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building.  Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans.  Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.

 

Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation.  The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.

 

25.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:         To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

26.   Adaptable units

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.

 

Note:              Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Disabled access & amenity.

 

27.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:              A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of trees.

 

28.   Noise from plant in residential zone

 

Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00 pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.

 

C1.   Note:    A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.

 

Reason:         To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.

 

29.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

30.   Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the Civil engineering Plans GO150270 Dwg. No. C1.01, C1.02, C2-C20 all issue ‘J’ dated 16 August 2016 prepared by ACOR Consultants have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and have been endorsed by the access consultant to confirm compliance with AS1428.1, DDA Transport Standards and Clause 26(1) and (2) and Clause 38 of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve.  The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.

 

The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works.  Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 - 1996 - Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads - Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.

 

A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.

 

31.   Energy Australia requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.

 

32.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

33.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:         To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

34.   Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee

 

To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

(a)      All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

(b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

(c)      The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

(d)      In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.

 

(e)      In this condition:

 

“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:         To maintain public infrastructure.

 

35.   Section 94 development contributions - other than identified centres

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Infrastructure Type                                                                      Total

LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural                                                    $1,502.33

Northern Area Local Parks & Sporting Facilities                                     $11,221.22

 

Development Contributions Total                                          $12,723.55

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and may vary at the time of payment in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Contributions outside the designated centres may be subject to a maximum contribution total in accordance with the s94E Direction issued by the Minister for Planning dated 21 August 2012, for so long as it remains legally in force.  If the total amount above is an exact multiple of $20,000 then the contributions calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 exceeded the maximum contribution payable and have been capped.  If the process of inflation carries the contribution above over the maximum amount permitted by the s94E Direction prior to payment, the amount will be limited at time of receipt.  Please contact Council to verify the total contributions payable prior to payment.

 

Reason:       To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

36.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

37.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·        The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·        In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

38.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:              Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

39.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

40.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan complies with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

41.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·           be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·           display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·           be durable and weatherproof

·           display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·           be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

42.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·           physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·           earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·           all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·           the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·           all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·           all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·           gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·           cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

43.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

44.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

45.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

46.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

47.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

48.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

49.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

50.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

51.   Drainage to existing system

 

Stormwater runoff from all new impervious areas and subsoil drainage systems shall be piped to the existing site drainage system. The installation of new drainage components must be completed by a licensed contractor in accordance with AS3500.3 (Plumbing Code) and the BCA. No stormwater runoff is to be placed into the Sydney Water sewer system. If an illegal sewer connection is found during construction, the drainage system must be rectified to the satisfaction of Council and Sydney Water.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

52.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing Coordinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the Coordinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

53.   Project arborist

 

A suitably qualified project arborist (AQF level 5) is to be engaged to advise the Principal Certifying Authority on the protection of trees at the site and to supervise the installation and maintenance of tree protection measures required by this consent.

 

Prior to the commencement of any works including demolition on the site in areas required to be protected by this consent, the project arborist shall inspect the site and satisfy himself/herself that the protection measures  are in accordance with the approved design and must provide a written certification to the Principal Certifying Authority to that effect.

 

If not satisfied, the project arborist must provide to the Principal Certifying Authority a list of works that are to be completed to ensure compliance with all conditions of consent relating to the protection of trees at the site. Those works must be undertaken to the satisfaction of the project arborist.

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

54.   Arborist’s report

 

All trees to be retained shall be inspected and monitored by an AQF Level 5 Arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 and recommendations in Tree Assessment and

Development Impact Report prepared by MacKay Tree Management for the site dated 23/10/15 and for the pedestrian pathway dated and 15/08/16, during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the project arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required during all works within the canopy spread of all existing trees on site and overhanging from adjoining sites, including date, brief description of the works inspected, and any mitigation works prescribed. 

 

All monitoring shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

·           All works as recommended by the project arborist are to be undertaken by an experienced arborist with a minimum AQF Level 3 qualification.

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

55.   Canopy/root pruning

 

Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree/s which is necessary to accommodate the approved works shall be undertaken by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist, with a minimum qualification of the AQF5.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Tree works

Tree 1/ Populus deltoides (Cottonwood)

This tree is located on the nature reserve on Mungarra Avenue

Minor root pruning

Tree 2/ Quercus palustris (Pin Oak)

This tree is located at the north-east corner of the site, within the adjoining property

Minor root pruning

Tree 3/ Melaleuca quinquenervia (Broad Leaved Paperbark)

This tree is located at the south-east corner of the site, within the adjoining property

Minor root pruning and branch reduction as per Root Mapping Report prepared by Cheryl Mackay, dated 26/09/16.

Tree 8/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

This tree is located at the south-west corner of the site, within the adjoining property 

Minor root pruning

Trees 26- 33 as listed in Arborist report, prepared by MacKay Tree Management, dated 15/08/16

Minor root pruning

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

56.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

57.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation, within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug:

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

Tree 1/ Populus deltoides (Cottonwood)

This tree is located on the nature reserve on Mungarra Avenue

9.8m

Tree 2/ Quercus palustris (Pin Oak)

This tree is located at the north-east corner of the site, within the adjoining property

7.8m

Tree 3/ Melaleuca quinquenervia (Broad Leaved Paperbark)

This tree is located at the south-east corner of the site, within the adjoining property

5.4m

Tree 8/ Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

This tree is located at the south-west corner of the site, within the adjoining property

7.2m

Trees 26 - 33 as listed in Arborist report, prepared by MacKay Tree Management, dated 15/08/16

Tree protection zone as listed

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

58.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

59.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

60.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:         To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

 

61.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·           Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·           This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

62.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 570459M_04 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

63.   Clotheslines and clothes dryers

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.

 

Reason:         To provide access to clothes drying facilities.

 

64.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:

 

1.         The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:

 

·     The Building Code of Australia

·      Australian Standard AS1668

·      Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable

 

2.         The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.

 

Note:              Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

65.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

66.   Completion of tree works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all tree works, including pruning in accordance with AS4373-2007 or remediation works in accordance with AS4370-2009, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the tree works are consistent with the development consent.

 

67.   Accessibility

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that where applicable:

 

·           international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2

·           the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993

·           the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods

 

Reason:         Disabled access & services.

 

68.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 24R.8.2). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

69.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·           the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·           the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 24 respectively, have been achieved

·           retained water is connected and available for use

·           all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·           components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·           all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

Note:              Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

70.   WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal (dual occupancy and         above)

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·           as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·           gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·           as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·           as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·           the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·           as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·           the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·           dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·           the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·           top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

71.   OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 24R8.1). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

72.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

 

 

73.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

74.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all mechanical ventilation systems are installed in accordance with Part F4.5 of the Building Code of Australia and comply with Australian Standards AS1668.2 and AS3666 Microbial Control of Air Handling and Water Systems of Building.

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.

 

75.   Fire safety certificate

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that, if applicable, a Fire Safety Certificate for any essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.

 

Reason:         To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.

 

76.   Restriction on land title - seniors living development

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that restriction as to use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, has been created restricting the occupation of the premises to:

 

·           people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·           people who live with people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·           staff employed to assist in the administration of and provision of services to housing provided in this development

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

77.   SEPP Seniors Living Advertising

 

All advertising, signage, marketing or promotion of the sale of the dwellings in this development shall make clear reference to the fact that this is a SEPP Seniors Living development and that at least one occupier shall be aged 55 years or over or have a disability.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

78.     Construction Standards - Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability

 

Prior to the issue of an occupation certificate or occupation of the development (whichever comes first), certification shall be provided from an accredited access consultant to the certifying authority which demonstrates that the fit out and construction of the development satisfies the design criteria in Schedule 3 of SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

79.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

80.   Noise control – plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

81.   Loading and unloading

 

At all times, all loading and unloading of service vehicles in connection with the use of the premises shall be carried out wholly within the site.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe traffic movement.

 

82.   Unobstructed driveways and parking areas

 

At all times, all driveways and parking areas shall be unobstructed. Driveways and car spaces shall not be used for the manufacture, storage or display of goods, materials or any other equipment and shall be used solely for vehicular access and for the parking of vehicles associated with the use of the premises.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe traffic movement.

 

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Armstrong, Berlioz, Szatow, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillor Citer

 

 

Councillor Szatow withdrew during discussion

Councillor Szatow returned

 

Councillor Citer withdrew during discussion

Councillor Citer returned

 

335

Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan - Update on discussions with Coles Property Development Group

 

File: S10467

Vide: GB.12

 

 

The purpose of this report is to recommend amendments to the draft Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan (as exhibited) based on recent discussions with Coles Property Development Group (Coles).

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this matter:

 

J Harwood

M Burgess

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Malicki/McDonald)

 

A.   That the amended lower ground floor plan of the draft Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan as it applies to all aspects of the supermarket component be adopted by Council.

 

B.   That the letter of support from Coles to Ku-ring-gai Council be received and noted.

 

C.   That a report be brought back to Council in early 2017 documenting the Chairperson’s findings on the public hearing and recommending a final master plan.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Mayor Councillor Anderson withdrew during discussion

 

Deputy Mayor Councillor David Ossip assumed the Chair

 

 

336

Turramurra Local Centre - Traffic and Transport Study

 

File: S10467

Vide: GB.13

 

 

To consider the Turramurra Community Hub Transport Scenario Testing Study, 2016.

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this matter:

 

J Dailey

D McGilvray

M Burgess

A Parker

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/McDonald)

 

A.   That Council adopt the Turramurra traffic and transport study (with the rail bridge option) in principle, and forward the proposal to Roads and Maritime Services for formal concurrence.

 

B.   The property No. 12 Turramurra Avenue (Lot 2 DP983832), Turramurra be divested by in accordance with Council’s – Acquisition and Divestment of Land Policy 2014 and the funds returned to the Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 Section 94 reserves.

 

For the Resolution:                Councillors Citer, McDonald, Pettett, Szatow, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Malicki, Armstrong and Berlioz

 

The above Resolution was CARRIED as an Amendment to the Original Motion.  The Original Motion was:

 

(Moved: Councillors Malicki/McDonald)

 

A.      That consultation be undertaken with residents of every street mentioned in the PeopleTrans Report where relevant to ensure these residents are aware of the impacts of the options on them and to allow them to comment on the proposals.

 

B.     Consultation to extend to community user groups within the centre including the Uniting Church, Meals on Wheels, Computer Pals for Seniors, the Turramurra Community Garden. Local action groups also to be asked for comment.

 

C.     Councillors to be given a peak time site inspection prior to the matter coming back to council.

 

D.        Following consultation a report be brought back to council for determination.

 

Deputy Mayor Councillor Ossip vacated the Chair

 

Mayor Councillor Anderson returned to Chair

 

 

337

Tender RFT14/2016 - Drainage Construction at 90 Babbage Road, Roseville Chase

 

File: S11081

Vide: GB.9

 

 

To consider tenders received for the construction of stormwater drainage works in 90 Babbage Road,  Roseville Chase and appoint the preferred tenderer

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Armstrong)

 

A.   That Council approve the recommendation of the Tender Evaluation Panel for the construction of the stormwater drainage in 90 Babbage Road, Roseville Chase.

 

B.   That Council approve an increase to the current budget of $480,000 to be allocated from the Infrastructure Facilities Reserve.

 

C.   That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.

 

D.   That the Seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.

 

E.   That all tenderers be advised of Councils decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulation

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , Citer, McDonald, Pettett, Malicki, Szatow, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Armstrong and Berlioz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

338

Clearway - Mona Vale Road from Pymble to St Ives

 

File: TM3/08

Vide: GB.10

 

 

To provide Council with a further update by the Roads and Maritime Services on the implementation of the clearways along Mona Vale Road.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/McDonald)

 

A.   That Council accept the offer of funding from the RMS for additional parking in the car park opposite the entrance to Stanley Street, St Ives at 208-210 Mona Vale Road St Ives.

 

B.   That Council advises the RMS of its acceptance to the proposed time parking changes in the adjoining car park and surrounding roads.

 

C.   That the RMS be formally contacted to review the old school site carpark for reconfiguration for increased car parking spaces, and the outcome reported back to Council, and that Council seek the RMS to fund the outcome.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

 

339

DA of 64 Townhouses at Gladstone Parade Lindfield

 

File: DA0481/16

Vide: QN.1

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor David Armstrong

 

 

In relation to a DA for 64 townhouses at Gladstone Parade Lindfield across the road from Lindfield Primary School, is there a briefing or any information about this DA?

 

 

Answered by Director Development and Regulation

 

The Director Development and Regulation advised that any Councillor is welcome to ask for a briefing through the Director, and upon request, that briefing will be provided.

 

 


 

 

340

Marion Street Theatre - Letter from the Mayor Councillor Jennifer Anderson to Paul Fletcher, MP

 

File: S10095/3

Vide: QN.2

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Cheryl Szatow

 

 

To Mayor Councillor Jennifer Anderson, in your response to a letter from Paul Fletcher, MP – asking for confirmation that Ku-ring-gai Council supports the Marian Street Theatre buildings to be heritage listed, you replied that an independent heritage assessment in 2015 had been carried out and did not even recommend a local heritage listing.

 

Who wrote this independent report?

 

Would you please furnish the report to Council within the week, as to date, it has not been located.

 

 

Answered by Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson

 

The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson advised the staff from various departments are looking for subject document that she personally recalls reading because as you would know she is chair of Council’s Heritage Committee, and has been for a considerable length of time, and she is always very interested in the reports on the heritage merits of any building, and she particularly remembers reading that report saying it didn’t have a recommendation for local listing. The Director of Strategy also recalls reading that document. Council officers are attempting to find out what it was in relation to, it may not have been the town centres, it may have been to do with the investigations on redeveloping the building for accessibility, etc., but will endeavour to find that and provide a fulsome response to Councillor Szatow.

 

 

 

341

Misquote from Mayor to North Shore Times of 2 December 2016 re Culworth Avenue Carpark

 

File: S09878

Vide: QN.3

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Cheryl Szatow

 

 

To the Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson, in reference to the article in the North Shore Times of 2 December 2016 you misquoted the letter from the Department of Planning and the Environment regarding the Culworth Avenue Carpark, Killara.

 

Would you please explain the reason for your misquote?

 

The letter said: ‘The reason the Department refused the reclassification was because Council had not provided adequate parking, there is uncertainty about any multi-level development and there was community concern.’

 

The North Shore Times reported, and they may have misquoted you, ‘That the reclassification was refused until a multi storey carpark would be erected.’

 

Would you please explain the reason for that misquote?

 

 

Answered by Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson

 

The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson advised she didn’t think it was a misquote, that is our understanding of the rationale for the decision not to continue with the reclassification at this stage because the government hasn’t funded their proposed multi-storey carpark. As you would know council staff, at the request of Council, wrote several times asking the Minister and the Department to purchase the site if it felt it was needed for resident carparking for the commuters, the train commuters. The answers in writing, which you would have seen Councillor Szatow, were that the Minister and the Department were satisfied that the site they had acquired would be sufficient with a multi-storey deck with the required capacity for the commuter carparking.

 

I am happy to provide a more fulsome report in writing.

 

 

 

342

Progress on the No Right Turn Eastern Road and Burns Road Wahroonga

 

File: TM11/08

Vide: QN.4

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Duncan McDonald

 

 

In relation to progress on the no right turn at Eastern Road/Burns Road Wahroonga at peak periods. It does cause considerable congestion along Eastern Road running south, and it is an issue, and I would just like to know if that has gone through to the Traffic Committee, has there any been anything discussed on that?

 

 

Answered by Director Operations

 

The Director Operations advised he would follow it up with the Traffic staff, but he recalls following up with the RMS and thought there was a response to that particular matter, but will respond.

 

 


 

 

343

Comments at North Turramurra Community Meeting (NTAG) Praising Council Staff for National Award

 

File: S08662

Vide: QN.5

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Duncan McDonald

 

 

This question is to you Madam Mayor, regarding a comment made at the North Turramurra Community Meeting (NTAG), a comment was raised by the designated District Commissioner of the Northern Region, Dr Dearing, she praised Ku-ring-gai Council staff regarding planning, where they were recognised at a national level. Can you explain more about what this is referring to in terms of planning?

 

Answered by Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson

 

The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson advised that Dr Dearing and her staff from the Greater Sydney Commission have been working with council officers across councils in the northern district, and they were very much wishing to praise our council for its town centres work, particularly in relation to Turramurra, but not only there, Lindfield etc.

 

Dr Dearing mentioned this in several briefings that have been open to Councillors and council officers in the last few weeks.  Mr Fabbro attended some of the aforementioned and may wish to add to that.

 

Answered by Acting Director Strategy and Environment (Antony Fabbro)

The Acting Director Strategy and Environment advised the award related to a national award for urban design and the patron of the award is the Prime Minister and Lucy Turnbull. The award was for the masterplanning we have done with Chrofi Architects, under Major Projects Urban Design, which is a national award.

 

Answered by Mayor Councillor Jennifer Anderson

Dr Dearing’s comments haven’t been only related to that award, she particularly praised council’s ability to keep our tree canopy and character within the new masterplanning processes, that she has been impressed with.

 

 


 

 

344

Bi-Centennial Park Carpark Line Marking Status

 

File: S02243/8

Vide: QN.6

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor David Armstrong

 

 

Is the line marking for the Bi-Centennial Park carpark near the pool on the agenda for next year, or next financial year?

 

 

Answered by Director Operations

 

The Director Operations advised the issue, which was raised in the budget meeting, is the pavement in that carpark is not at a standard that would justify proper line marking, it would just deteriorate very quickly. So it is probably a matter that is a budget bit item and it needs to be resurfaced before any line marking can be done.

 

 

 

The Meeting closed at 9:54 pm

 

The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 6 December 2016 (Pages 1 - 453) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 7 February 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

          __________________________                                 __________________________

                   General Manager                                                         Mayor / Chairperson

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

MM.1 / 52

 

 

Item MM.1

S07765/8

 

27 January 2017

 

 

Mayoral Minute

 

 

2017 Australia Day Honours and Citizen of the Year Awards

 

 

  

 

I am pleased to inform you that 12 Ku-ring-gai citizens, through their outstanding achievements and services to the community, have been awarded 2017 Australia Day Honours.

 

We are very proud to have these dedicated and talented Australians as members of the Ku-ring-gai community.

 

I would like to read to you the names of these special Ku-ring-gai citizens and, on behalf of Council, congratulate them on their excellent contributions to Australian society.

 

David Timothy CHEN  OAM  of Killara, for service to medicine, and to professional associations

 

Michael John McEWEN  OAM  of St Ives, for service to the community through a range of organisations

 

Helen Elaine MILLER  OAM  of Turramurra, for service to veterans and their families

 

Yair Phillip MILLER  OAM  of St Ives, for service to the community through a range of organisations, and to interfaith relations

 

Susan Lesley NURSE  OAM  of Pymble, for service to the Uniting Church in Australia

 

Geoffrey Thomas PAINTER  AM  of Warrawee, for significant service to medicine in the field of ophthalmology, and to international relations, particularly to eye health in Asia and he Pacific

 

Richard John SCHLOEFFEL  OAM  of Gordon, for service to medicine in the field of chronic and infectious disease

 

Owen Bruce SLEE  AM  Late of Turramurra, for significant service to science, particularly in the field of radio astronomy, as a researcher, author and mentor of young scientists

 

Patricia Whitmore SPOONER  OAM  of North Turramurra, for service to the community through volunteer roles

 

Tiffany THOMAS KANE  OAM  of Killara, for service to sport as a gold medallist at the Rio 2016 Paralympic Games

 

Pamela Joy WALKER  OAM  of Pymble, for service to the Uniting Church in Australia, and to pastoral care programs

 

Adrian Anthony UNGER  OAM  of East Lindfield, for service to people with Parkinson’s disease

 

I also congratulate Ku-ring-gai’s Citizen of the Year winners for 2017:

 

Citizen of the Year 

-   Dr Zeny Edwards

Young Citizen of the Year

-   David Taylor

Outstanding Service to the Community

(Individual)                    

-   Helen Wortham

Outstanding Service to the Community

(Group)           

-   WW1 Writers’ Group

 

On behalf of Council, I congratulate all these award winners on their outstanding achievements.

 

Ku-ring-gai should be proud that it has so many citizens being recognised at the highest level for their selfless dedication, commitment and contribution to local, national and international communities.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council acknowledge the outstanding contribution made by these recipients of 2017 Australia Day Honours to the Ku-ring-gai community and to the well-being of our society.

 

B.   That the Mayor write to the recipients on behalf of Council to congratulate them on receiving their award, including a copy of this Mayoral Minute.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jennifer Anderson

Mayor

 

 

 

   


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

  / 54

 

 

Item  

88/05589/01

 

4 January 2017

 

 

Petition

 

 

Request for Concrete Footpath on
Junction Road Wahroonga

  

 

“We, the undersigned, request the Mayor and Councillors of Ku-ring-gai to consider building a concrete sidewalk on Junction Road, Wahroonga – specifically from 105 Junction Road to 33 Junction Road (Junction Road and Grosvenor Street) during the next year. (Thirty Five [35] Signatures)

 

We do not know why the Council has not built a sidewalk on our side of Junction Road, as this is a busy street with cars driving by on an ongoing basis, with bus stops, and with senior housing next to our house. We can think of a number of reasons why building a sidewalk is important, our top five reasons are:

 

1.   Sidewalks provide a safe and level walkway – especially during wet weather and for people using wheelchairs, the elderly, or people pushing a cart of stroller.

2.   Sidewalks provide safe places for children to walk from and to schools and school bus stops.

3.   Sidewalks improve the ability for people to get around by providing ways for them to get wherever they need to go: work, parks, schools, shopping areas, transit stops, and home without using cars (sidewalks benefits less traffic and reduced noise).

4.   Sidewalks enhance the appearance of individual properties, neighbourhoods, and the entire community.

5.   Sidewalks help protect property frontage from damage due to erosion and parking.

 

Of course, walking is the most democratic way to get around. It is the oldest mode of transport, it’s free, and it may even help us burn a few calories. We hope the Council supports our desire to shift back to pedestrian – friendly streets. We firmly believe enhancing the quality of sidewalks not only attracts more pedestrians, but also helps to enjoy public spaces more where people want to spend time outdoors.”

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.1 / 55

 

 

Item GB.1

S05273

 

17 January 2017

 

 

Investment Report as at 30 November 2016

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for November 2016.

 

 

background:

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

 

comments:

The net return on investments for the financial year to November 2016 was $1,846,000 against a revised budget of $1,823,000 giving a YTD favourable variance of $23,000.

 

 

recommendation:

That the summary of investments performance for November 2016 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for November 2016.

 

Background

 

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Comments

 

Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot

 

The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.

 

 

* As at end of November, Council had a slight overweight position to Bendigo-Adelaide Bank due to its combined investment allocation with Rural Bank, a subsidiary of Bendigo-Adelaide Bank. Council’s Investment Policy restricts exposure to individual financial institutions by their rating so that single entity exposure is limited. The current limit for the “A” rated institutions allowed by the Policy is 15%.  The total funds invested in Bendigo & Rural Banks represent 17.0% of the total investment portfolio  ($24m out of total portfolio of $141.2m).The overinvestment of $2.85m  (or 2.0%) in Bendigo/Rural Bank is not significant compared to total investment portfolio with minimum risk exposure. This will decrease further with one investment of $2m maturing in December. Council has reviewed its Investment Policy (proposed for adoption at Ordinary Meeting of Council on 7 February 2017), and as part of this process, the counter party investment limits have been revised as well.

 

Cumulative Investment Returns against Revised Budget

 

The net return on investments for the month of November 2016 was $1,846,000 against a revised budget of $1,823,000 giving a YTD favourable variance of $23,000.

 

The total return on investments for the month of November is provided below.

 

A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date revised budget is shown in the Chart below.

 

 

Cash Flow and Investment Movements

 

Council’s total cash and investment portfolio at the end of November 2016 was $141,198,000, compared to $135,962,000 at the end of October 2016, a net cash inflow of $5,236,000. The cash inflow was mainly due to second instalment of rates income.

 

One investment has matured, and two new investments were made during the month of November 2016.

 

 

Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

Overall during the month of November the investment performance was well above the industry benchmark.

 

The benchmark is specific to the type of investment and the details are provided below.

 

Ø AusBond Bank Bill Index is used for all Council’s investments

 

Table 1 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

 

Table 2 below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month.

Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investments.

 

Table 2 - Investments Portfolio Summary during November 2016

         

   

 

Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile

 

The allocation of Council’s investments by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown below:

 

 

 

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership & Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial

resources and assets to maximise delivery of

services

Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance

Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council

 

Governance Matters

 

Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:

 

(1)      The responsible accounting officer of a council:

 

(a)      must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:

 

(i)      if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or

 

(ii)     if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and

 

(b)      must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.

 

(2)      The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.

 

Risk Management

 

Council manages the risk associated with investments by diversifying the types of investment, credit quality, counterparty exposure and term to maturity profile.

 

Council invests its funds in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order.

 

All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, CPG Research & Advisory.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The revised budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2016/2017 is $4,080,900. Of this amount approximately $2,454,000 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to development contributions, $555,800 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $1,071,100 is available for operations.

 

Social Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer

 

I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Summary

 

As at 30 November 2016:

 

 

·     Council’s total cash and investment portfolio is $141,198,000.

 

·     The net return on investments for the financial year to November 2016 was $1,846,000 against a revised budget of $1,823,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $23,000.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That the summary of investments and performance for November 2016 be received and noted.

 

B.       That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tony Ly

Financial Accounting Officer

 

 

 

 

Angela Apostol

Manager Finance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

2016/124274

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

Item No: GB.1

 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.2 / 63

 

 

Item GB.2

S05273

 

19 January 2017

 

 

Review of Council's Investment Policy

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To review and adopt Council's revised Investment Policy.

 

 

background:

Council’s current Investment Policy was adopted in December 2013. Council periodically reviews and updates its Investment Policy.

 

 

comments:

Council has sought the advice of CPG Research & Advisory Pty Ltd in reviewing the Investment Policy.

The revised Investments Policy was reviewed and endorsed by the internal Audit & Risk Committee.

 

 

recommendation:

That the attached revised Investment Policy, endorsed by the Audit & Risk Committee, be adopted by Council.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To review and adopt Council's revised Investment Policy.

 

Background

 

Council’s current Investment Policy was adopted in December 2013.

 

Council currently has an investment portfolio of $138 million. Investment earnings are a significant source of revenue for Council and it is important that Council maximises returns on investments, whilst having due consideration of risk tolerance, liquidity and security.

 

Comments

 

Council has utilised its investment advisory firm CPG Research & Advisory in reviewing and updating the Investment Policy. A presentation by the investment advisors to the Audit and Risk Committee was held on 8 December 2016. Council’s revised Policy is attached to this report

(Attachment A1).

 

Council must invest its funds in accordance with the Ministerial Investment Order. The Investment policy specifically lists the authorised and prohibited investments.

 

Authorised Investments are limited to those allowed by the Ministerial Investment Order as follows:

 

·     Commonwealth / State / Territory Government securities e.g. bonds;

·     Interest bearing deposits / senior securities issued by an eligible ADI;

·     Bills of Exchange (no more than 200 days duration) guaranteed by an ADI;

·     Debentures issued by a NSW Council under Local Government Act (1993);

·     Deposits with T-Corp &/or Investments in T-Corp Hour-Glass Facility; and

 

While Council may only invest in the above types of investment, for clarity the proposed investment policy prohibits the following types of new investment:

 

·     Derivative based instruments;

·     Principal only investments or securities that provide potentially nil or negative cash flow; and

·     Standalone securities issued that have underlying futures, options, forwards contracts and swaps of any kind.

·     Other investments excluded by the Ministerial Investment Order.

 

Changes to the revised Investment Policy are:

 

·     Authorised investments - Grandfathered Investments have been removed from the Policy due to Council no longer holding these investments. The last Grandfathered investment was sold in April 2016.

 

 

·     Credit ratings:

 

Ratings have been reviewed and it is proposed to increase the maximum holding in “A” Category to 70% (from 50%). The change is partially due to credit rating movements over recent years (e.g. Rabobank’s split rating resulted in downgrade to “A+” (from “AA” range), while Bank of Queensland (BoQ) upgraded to “A-” from “BBB+”). In addition Floating Rate Notes (FRNs) are also looking more attractive, as investment issues are mainly dominated by the “AA” and “A” rated banks. On a relative basis, “A” rated FRNs are attractive as spreads have not contracted as much as the “AA” rated FRNs. In turn, this could potentially see a reduction in the total investment allocation to “BBB” and unrated ADIs.

 

“Lower, and Unrated” Rating - A definition of “Lower, and Unrated” institutions has been included in the Policy:” The lower and unrated ADIs represents the banks, credit unions and building societies that are regulated by Australia’s banking regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), consistent with the higher rated ADIs. These ADIs are officially “not rated” by the ratings agencies as they are relatively small (asset size). Despite not having an official credit rating, they generally remain financially solid and tend to hold higher levels of capital adequacy compared to the higher rated ADIs. Overall, they are not speculative institutions and are not associated as being high risk, particularly for the purposes of Council’s investments, which would predominately only be invested in short-dated fixed term deposits amongst these ADIs”

 

·     Counterparty Limits – Exposure to individual Counterparties/financial institutions  has been reviewed and it is proposed to increase the following limits:

 

AA Category – 30% (from 25%)

A Category - 20% (from 15%)

 

During periods where specials are not offered, or at times where there is capacity issues, a higher ceiling on the counterparty limits with the “AA” (proposed 30%) and “A” (proposed 20%) rated banks does not force Council to invest with the worst rates in that space.

 

·     Performance benchmark - The Performance benchmark has changed to AusBond Bank Bill Index (formerly the UBS Bank Bill Index (BBI)). The UBS Australia index family was acquired by Bloomberg from Q3 2014, and while branding changed the benchmark is unaltered. The Bank Bill Index represents the performance of a notional rolling parcel of bills averaging 45 days and is the widely used benchmark for local councils and other institutional cash investments

 

·     Investment Timeframes – investment timeframes have been reviewed.  Minimum allocations have been removed for working capital and short term investments as they are made in the context of meeting cash flow and operational requirements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Council’s Investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local (General) Regulation 2005, the Ministerial Investment Order  and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Risk Management

 

Council is required to adopt an Investment Policy consistent with the Ministerial Investment Order. The Ministerial Investments Order prescribes the forms of investment that Council can invest in.

 

The Investment Policy should identify all types of risks associated with making investment decisions. The Risk Management Guidelines section of the proposed Investment Policy identifies and defines these risks as follows: credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk, maturity risk, interest risk.

 

All investments are made in accordance with Council’s Investment Policy with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisory, CPG Research & Advisory.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Investment income is a significant revenue source for Council and it is important that returns are

maximised, whilst having due consideration of risk tolerance, liquidity and security.

 

Social Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Summary

 

Council’s Investment Policy has been reviewed in consultation with Council’s investment advisors, CPG Research & Advisory Pty Ltd. The revised Investment Policy has also been reviewed and endorsed by the Audit and Risk Committee on 8 December 2016.

 

The revised Investment Policy is attached to this report (Attachment A1).

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That the attached revised Investment Policy be adopted by Council.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Angela Apostol

Manager Finance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Investment Policy - February 2017

 

2017/021545

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Investment Policy - February 2017

 

Item No: GB.2

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.3 / 80

 

 

Item GB.3

S05273

 

20 January 2017

 

 

Investment Report as at 31 December 2016

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for December 2016.

 

 

background:

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

 

comments:

The net return on investments for the financial year to December 2016 was $2,228,000 against a revised budget of $2,178,000 giving a YTD favourable variance of $50,000.

 

 

recommendation:

That the summary of investments performance for December 2016 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for December 2016.

 

Background

 

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Comments

 

Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot

 

The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.

 

 

* As at end of December, Council had a slight overweight position to Bendigo-Adelaide Bank due to its combined investment allocation with Rural Bank, a subsidiary of Bendigo-Adelaide Bank. Council’s Investment Policy restricts exposure to individual financial institutions by their rating so that single entity exposure is limited. The current limit for the “A” rated institutions allowed by the Policy is 15%.  The total funds invested in Bendigo & Rural Banks represent 15.9% of the total investment portfolio  ($22m out of total portfolio of $138.7m).The overinvestment of $1.2m  (or 0.9%) in Bendigo/Rural Bank is not significant compared to total investment portfolio with minimum risk exposure. Council has reviewed its Investment Policy (proposed for adoption at Ordinary Meeting of Council on 7 February 2017), and as part of this process, the counter party investment limits have been revised as well.

 

Cumulative Investment Returns against Revised Budget

 

The net return on investments for the month of December 2016 was $2,228,000 against a revised budget of $2,178,000 giving a YTD favourable variance of $50,000.

 

The total return on investments for the month of December is provided below.

 

 

A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date revised budget is shown in the Chart below.

 

 

Cash Flow and Investment Movements

 

Council’s total cash and investment portfolio at the end of December 2016 was $138,694,000, compared to $141,198,000 at the end of November 2016, a net cash outflow of $2,504,000. The cash outflow were mainly due to loan repayments & creditor payments.

 

Three investments have matured, and four new investments were made during the month of December 2016.

 

 

Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

Overall during the month of December the investment performance was well above the industry benchmark.

 

The benchmark is specific to the type of investment and the details are provided below.

 

Ø AusBond Bank Bill Index is used for all Council’s investments

 

Table 1 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

 

Table 2 below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month.

Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investments.

 

Table 2 - Investments Portfolio Summary during December 2016

 

 

   

 

Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile

 

The allocation of Council’s investments by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown below:

 

 

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership & Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial

resources and assets to maximise delivery of

services

Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance

Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council

 

Governance Matters

 

Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:

 

(1)      The responsible accounting officer of a council:

 

(a)      must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:

 

(i)      if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or

 

(ii)     if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and

 

(b)      must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.

 

(2)      The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.

 

Risk Management

 

Council manages the risk associated with investments by diversifying the types of investment, credit quality, counterparty exposure and term to maturity profile.

 

Council invests its funds in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order.

 

All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, CPG Research & Advisory.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The revised budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2016/2017 is $4,080,900. Of this amount approximately $2,454,000 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to development contributions, $555,800 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $1,071,100 is available for operations.

 

Social Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer

 

I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Summary

 

As at 31 December 2016:

 

 

·     Council’s total cash and investment portfolio is $138,694,000.

 

·     The net return on investments for the financial year to December 2016 was $2,228,000 against a revised budget of $2,178,000, giving a YTD favourable variance of $50,000.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That the summary of investments and performance for December 2016 be received and noted.

 

B.       That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tony Ly

Financial Accounting Officer

 

 

 

 

Angela Apostol

Manager Finance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

2016/124274

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

Item No: GB.3

 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.4 / 89

 

 

Item GB.4

CY00259/9

 

10 January 2017

 

 

Business Approved under Authority Delegated to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager for the Christmas/New Year recess period 2016/2017

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To inform Councillors of any business approved under delegated authority during the 2016/17 recess period.

 

 

background:

At its meeting on 22 November 2016, Council resolved to delegate authority to exercise all powers, authorities, duties and functions of Council except those set out in Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993 during the period 7 December 2016 to 6 February 2017 to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager.

 

 

comments:

Council was required to deal with 4 matters that could not be deferred during the recess period.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To inform Councillors of any business approved under delegated authority during the 2016/17 recess period.

 

Background

 

At its meeting on 22 November 2016, Council resolved to delegate authority to exercise all powers, authorities, duties and functions of Council except those set out in Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993 during the period 7 December 2016 to 6 February 2017 to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.   Such powers, authorities and functions may only be exercised by unanimous agreement between the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager.

 

b.   Any such power, authority, duty or function shall only be exercised by the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager jointly where they are of the opinion that the          exercise of any such power, authority, duty or function could not be deferred until the      meeting of Council on 7 February 2017.

 

c.   That consultation, subject to their availability, be held with Ward Councillors on matters where they would normally be contacted, before delegation is exercised.

 

Comments

 

Council was required to deal with 4 matters that could not be deferred during the recess period.

 

a)   Registration for the 2017 Local Government NSW Tourism Conference. Resolved, as follows, on the 23 December 2016:

 

That any Councillors interested in attending the LGNSW 2017 Tourism Conference advise the General Manager by Wednesday, 11 January 2017.

 

b)   Council’s submission to the Office of Local Government regarding the development of a Model Code of Meeting Practice. Resolved, as follows, on the 23 January 2017:

 

That, in relation to the call from the Office of Local Government for submissions regarding the development of a Model Code of Meeting Practice, Council makes the following submission:

 

Council supports the proposal for a Model Code of Meeting Practice. Council would, in particular, support the standardisation of procedural matters such as rules of debate and the moving of motions and amendments. The Model Code of Meeting Practice should ensure clear definitions of terminology and a solid framework for meeting procedure to ensure that meetings can be easily followed and understood by members of the public across different Council areas. Council requests that once drafted the proposed Model Code of Meeting Practice be forwarded to all Councils for comment.

 

c)   Council’s submission to the 2017 Local Government Remuneration Tribunal. Resolved, as follows, on the 30 January 2017:

 

That, in relation to the call for submissions regarding the 2017 Local Government Remuneration Tribunal, Council makes the following submission:

 

Council is of the opinion that Ku-ring-gai Council is better suited to the category of “Metropolitan Centre” than “Metropolitan”, due to the scale and diversity of services provided and the added responsibility that this places on Councillors. Some of the reasons for this are outlined below.

 

Major Projects

In the next 5-10 years, Ku-ring-gai Council is expecting to deliver several extraordinary projects for development of spaces and social capacity-building services for its community. This will entail almost $500 million worth of projects for creation of new capital assets and services including libraries, child care facilities, parking areas, green space, community hub projects and associated retail, residential and transport development.

 

This is the equivalent of almost six times Council’s current annual operational expenditure and about eight times its average annual capital works expenditure. The projects are also more complex than normal capital works in terms of the array of skills, financial structuring and partnerships that will be required for delivery.

 

These projects aim to activate 3 of the 6 existing local centres, and will provide new community facilities as well as increased commercial and residential opportunities.

 

Environment and Sustainability

Ku-ring-gai Council’s Environmental Levy program, in place since 2005, funds the annual delivery of $2.6 million of environmental initiatives within the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area (LGA) and to date has leveraged $9.6 million in federal and state grants to augment the delivery of the Levy program. Council’s environmental service delivery is significantly enhanced through the Environmental Levy in areas including stormwater filtration and harvesting, renewable energy and energy efficiency, fire trails and fire breaks, weed control and bushland regeneration, community environmental education and volunteer programs and environmental monitoring.

 

Unique environmental services provided by Ku-ring-gai Council include:

·     Environmental volunteering program (Ku-ring-gai Council is the 3rd largest Bushcare program in NSW with comparable numbers to Sutherland and Hornsby Councils, who have the 1st and 2nd largest programs)

·     Pool to Pond program (over 80 pool conversions) and native bee hive program (over 1,000 bee hives distributed), enhancing urban biodiversity and unique to Ku-ring-gai

·     Large urban water management program (including 16 stormwater harvesting systems, 2 sewer mining systems and 2 leachate systems)

·     Managing over 1,1000 hectares of bushland

 

Community

Ku-ring-gai Council has a broad demographic spread – with a higher than average number of residents aged over 60 and under 19 years which requires us to deliver a more diverse range of services to meet the needs of the community. The Ku-ring-gai community has a long history of expecting high levels of service from Council, and this is reflected in the diversity and scope of services we provide.

 

Ku-ring-gai has a large population of 122,859 spread over 86km2, and high levels of community involvement. Council currently has 4 libraries, a hospital, and has one of the highest numbers of schools, including state and private schools, in a local government area. It provides a significant children’s services function including family day care, vacation care, after school care and the running of a 0-5 year old childcare centre. Ku-ring-gai also has a recognised cultural, ecological, heritage and tourism program.

 

Infrastructure Assets

Ku-ring-gai Council’s infrastructure assets represent a vast investment over many generations that support modern living in the community. The cost, condition and value of assets are reported each year in financial statements within the Annual Report. The infrastructure assets are valued at $927Million and the carrying amount (WDV) is $518Million.

 

Heritage and Urban Design

Ku-ring-gai contains a significant amount of striking residential architecture, with houses designed by many of Australia’s prominent twentieth century architects such as John Sulman, Howard Joseland, Hardy Wilson, Leslie Wilkinson, Ken Woolley, Russell Jack and Harry Seidler. The area is also undergoing significant revitalisation and urban renewal - this requires Council particular expertise and knowledge to maintain the appropriate balance between change and retaining the original character of the area. The community is actively involved in heritage matters and are highly articulate, resourced and demanding – meaning that Ku-ring-gai Councillors must be well informed of heritage matters and accept a higher level of responsibility in relation to these issues.

 

Ku-ring-gai also has a number of significant Aboriginal heritage sites, which we are helping to protect by supporting the Aboriginal Heritage Office and raising awareness through the annual Guringai festival and Naidoc Week.

 

d)   Council’s submission to the Office of Local Government regarding proposed regulations for induction and ongoing professional development for Mayors and Councillors. At the time of writing the following recommendation is being circulated to Councillors for comment. The matter is to be resolved by 3 February 2017. If a resolution other than the following recommendation is moved, Councillors will be notified via a late attachment to this report.

 

That, in relation to the call for submissions regarding the proposed regulations for induction and ongoing professional development for Mayors and Councillors, Council makes the following submission:

 

 

Council supports the proposed regulations in relation to Councillor induction and ongoing professional development programs. In meeting these obligations, it would be helpful to have access to some standard induction and professional development resources – such as eLearning modules, training materials, and templates – covering the basic skills, knowledge and processes that are common across the local government industry, including:

·     Disclosure of interests and pecuniary interest returns

·     Code of Meeting Practice (based on the Model Code that is currently being developed)

·     Basic financial skills for Councillors

·     The roles and responsibilities of Councillors and the Mayor

·     Code of Conduct (based on the existing Model Code).

 

Standardised, freely accessible materials and templates would both reduce potential resourcing burdens for Councils, and ensure a consistent standard of training and professional development across all NSW Councils. This would in turn enable Councils to focus resources on supplementing the generic program and providing training and professional development opportunities pertinent to the specific needs of the local area and the individual Councillors.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership and Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

The organisation is recognised and distinguished by its ethical decision-making, efficient management, innovation and quality customer service.

Council's Governance framework is developed to ensure probity, transparency and the principles of sustainability are integrated and applied into our policies, plans, guidelines and decision-making processes.

Ensure effective and efficient conduct of Council and committee meetings for the benefit of councillors and the community.

 

Governance Matters

 

It is Council’s usual practice to grant delegated authority to exercise all powers, authorities, duties and functions of Council, except those set out in Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993, during the Christmas/New Year period.

 

Risk Management

 

Nil.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Social Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Community Consultation

 

Nil.

 

Internal Consultation

 

All matters resolved under delegated authority during the 2016/17 recess period were circulated to all Councillors and executive staff for comment prior to approval.

 

Summary

 

At its meeting on 22 November 2016, Council resolved to delegate authority to exercise all powers, authorities, duties and functions of Council except those set out in Section 377 of the Local Government Act 1993 during the period 7 December 2016 to 6 February 2017 to the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and General Manager.

 

Council was required to deal with 4 matters that could not be deferred during the recess period.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council receives and notes the report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amber Moloney

Manager Records and Governance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.5 / 95

 

 

Item GB.5

S03662

 

10 January 2017

 

 

Election of Council Representative on
Ku-ring-gai Youth Development Service (KYDS) Committee

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council of the resignation of Councillor Citer as Council’s representative on the KYDS Management Committee, and seek a resolution regarding the appointment of a new representative and alternate representative.

 

 

background:

On 15 September 2017, Councillor Citer was elected as Council’s representative on the KYDS Management Committee. Councillor Fornari-Orsmond was elected as an alternative representative.

 

 

comments:

On Friday 9 December 2016, Councillor Citer notified staff and KYDS of his resignation from this position. As the elected alternative, Councillor Fornari-Orsmond has assumed this role.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council appoints its representative and alternate representative on the KYDS Management Committee.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To advise Council of the resignation of Councillor Citer as Council’s representative on the KYDS Management Committee, and seek a resolution regarding the appointment of a new representative and alternate representative.

 

 

Background

 

On 15 September 2017, Councillor Citer was elected as Council’s representative on the KYDS Management Committee. Councillor Fornari-Orsmond was elected as an alternative representative.

 

Comments

 

On Friday 9 December 2016, Councillor Citer notified staff and KYDS of his resignation from this position. As the elected alternative, Councillor Fornari-Orsmond has assumed this role.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek a resolution regarding the appointment of a new representative and alternate representative.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership and Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

The organisation is recognised and distinguished by its ethical decision making, efficient management, innovation and quality customer service.

 

Council’s governance framework is developed to ensure probity, transparency and the principles of sustainability are integrated and applied into our policies, plans, guidelines and decision making processes.

 

Comply with the requirements of the Local Government Act and Regulations.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Councillor representation on the external committees and organisations identified in this report is an important component of representing Council and understand the community’s views on a range of matters relevant to Ku-ring-gai.

 

Risk Management

 

Nil.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Social Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Community Consultation

 

Nil.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Nil.

 

Summary

 

On 15 September 2017, Councillor Citer was elected as Council’s representative on the KYDS Management Committee. Councillor Fornari-Orsmond was elected as an alternative representative. On Friday 9 December 2016, Councillor Citer notified staff and KYDS of his resignation from this position. As the elected alternative, Councillor Fornari-Orsmond has assumed this role.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek a resolution regarding the appointment of a new representative and alternate representative.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council appoints its representative and alternate representative on the KYDS Management Committee.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amber Moloney

Manager Records and Governance

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.6 / 98

 

 

Item GB.6

FY00581/2

 

30 January 2017

 

 

2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference: Building Liveable, Walkable, Sustainable Communities

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council of the 2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference.

 

 

background:

The 2017 Smart Urban Futures National Conference, presented by the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) and Victoria Walks, will be held on Tuesday March 28 and Wednesday March 29, 2017 at The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Conference Centre, 250-290 Spring Street, Melbourne.

 

 

comments:

The theme for the 2017 conference is ‘Building Liveable, Walkable, Sustainable Communities’.

 

 

recommendation:

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference advise the General Manager by Friday, 24 February 2017.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To advise Council of the 2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference.  

 

Background

 

The 2017 Smart Urban Futures National Conference, presented by the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) and Victoria Walks, will be held on Tuesday March 28 and Wednesday March 29, 2017 at The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Conference Centre, 250-290 Spring Street, Melbourne.

 

Comments

 

The Key conference themes are:

·     Preparing for an uncertain future – what might it look like? How do we position our communities to be resilient and adaptable to whatever comes our way?

·     Healthy communities and street design that works for everyone – designing for the young and the old, gender and diversity

·     Building community support – how to get councillors, traders, stakeholders and the public on-side

·     Development we can be proud of – building new suburbs and major infill that really work

·     Integrated transport planning – transport projects that work for local communities

·     Bringing economic development and urban design together – selling sustainable urban change as an economic development path.

 

The full conference program is attached (Attachment A1).

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership and Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

Council leads the community by advocating, influencing and participating in policy development to the benefit of the local area

Council actively engages with stakeholders to inform the development of Council’s strategies and plans as appropriate

Pursue opportunities to contribute to policy development affecting Ku-ring-gai at state and regional levels

 

Governance Matters

 

The Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy provides for Council to meet the reasonable costs of Councillors attending conferences authorised by resolution of Council.

 

Risk Management

 

There are no risk management considerations associated with the recommendation in this report.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The cost of attending the conference is $594 per person (incl. GST). Travel and accommodation costs will be additional.

 

Attendance is provided for in the Councillor’s conference budget in accordance with the Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities Policy.

 

Council has an annual budget of $30,700 for Councillors’ attendance at conferences with $25,973 remaining in the 2016/2017 financial year.

 

Social Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Nil.

 

Community Consultation

 

Nil.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Nil.

 

Summary

 

The 2017 Smart Urban Futures National Conference, presented by the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) and Victoria Walks, will be held on Tuesday March 28 and Wednesday March 29, 2017 at The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Conference Centre, 250-290 Spring Street, Melbourne.

 

The theme for the 2017 conference is ‘Building Liveable, Walkable, Sustainable Communities’.

 

 

Recommendation:

That any Councillors interested in attending the 2017 MAV Smart Futures National Conference advise the General Manager by Friday, 24 February 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amber Moloney

Manager Records and Governance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1

2017 MAV Smart Urban Futures National Conference Program

 

2017/021144

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - 2017 MAV Smart Urban Futures National Conference Program

 

Item No: GB.6

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.7 / 105

 

 

Item GB.7

DA0158/16

 

13 October 2016

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

1 Milray Street and 12 - 14 Kochia Lane Lindfield - Demolition of existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development consisting of 16 townhouses, basement parking, landscaping works and amalgamation of three lots into one

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.7

 

 

Application No:

DA0158/16

Property Details:

1 Milray Street and 12 – 14 Kochia Lane, Lindfield

Lot & DP No:      Lot X DP 406932 and Lots 1 and 2 DP 1182693

Site area (m2):    2564m²

Zoning:               R4 High Density Residential

Ward:

Roseville

Proposal/Purpose:

Demolition of existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development consisting of 16 townhouses, basement parking, landscaping works and amalgamation of three lots into one

Type of Consent:

Local

Applicant:

Urbanesque Planning Pty Ltd

Owner:

Rudder Development One Pty Ltd

Date Lodged:

11 April 2016

Recommendation:

Approval

 

 


Purpose of Report

 

To determine Development Application No. DA0158/16 for demolition of existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development consisting of 16 townhouses, basement parking, landscaping works and amalgamation of three lots into one.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Places, Spaces & Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P3.1 The built environment delivers attractive, interactive and sustainable living and working environments

 

A high standard of design quality and building environmental performance is achieved in new development

Assessment of applications is consistent with Council’s adopted LEP’s and DCP’s.

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Issues:                                   Secondary front setback

Building separation

Basement projection and elevated terraces

Top storey floor area

 

Submissions:                          Yes – 2 submissions

 

Land & Environment Court:    N/A

 

Recommendation:                  Approval

 

History

 

Site

 

The site is legally described as Lot X within DP 406932, Lot 1 and Lot 2 within DP 1182693 and is known as 1 Milray Street and 12 and 14 Kochia Lane, Lindfield. The site is located on the corner of Milray Street and Kochia Lane. The site has an area of 2564m². The site is regular in shape with a frontage of 22.86 metres to Milray Street and a frontage of 112.4 metres to Kochia Lane.

 

Pre-DA

 

A Pre-DA consultation was undertaken with Council on13 October 2015. The proposal was for ten (10) town houses and related to 1 Milray Street only. Issues raised related to streetscape presentation, setbacks, repetitive design, building separation and landscape design.

 

A follow up Pre-DA consultation was undertaken on 7 December 2015 which proposed 17 townhouses and included 12 – 14 Kochia Lane. Issues raised included setbacks, landscape outcome, reconfiguration of townhouse to front Milray Street and to be adaptable and built form responding to site topography.

 

DA History

 

11 April 2016

Application lodged.

 

 

22 April – 22 May 2016

The application was notified to neighbouring property owners for a period of 30 days. Two (2) submissions were received.

 

 

 

7 June 2016

A preliminary assessment letter was sent to the applicant seeking additional information.

 

 

27 June 2016

Applicant and experts meet with Council officers to discuss preliminary assessment letter.

 

 

15 August 2016

Applicant formally submits amended plans and information.

 

 

1 September 2016

Council advised the applicant concerns requiring amended plans. 

 

 

12 September 2016

Applicant met with team leader and landscape assessment officer.

 

 

22 September 2016

Applicant submits amended plans and information.

 

 

22 September 2016

Council advises of engineering concerns with the amended information.

 

 

14 October 2016

Applicant submits amended plans and information.

 

 

27 October 2016

Council officers meet with applicant and architect to discuss outstanding issues.

 

 

11th November 2016

Applicant submits amended plans.

 

 

21 November 2016

Applicant submits further amended plans

 

 

21 December 2016

Applicant submits further amended plans.

 

 

23 January 2017

Applicant submits further amended plans

 

The Site

 

Site Description

 

No, 1 Milray Street contains a rendered brick dwelling and mature landscaping within the frontage. The site has vehicular access from Kochia Lane to a detached garage located at the eastern corner of the site. The allotment has an area of 1732m².

 

Nos. 12 and 14 Kochia Lane contain an existing two storey dual occupancy development. No. 12 Kochia Lane has an area of 400m² and 14 Kochia Lane has an area of 473m². Both properties have vehicular access from Kochia Lane. No. 14 Kochia Lane has a 1 metre wide easement along the rear boundary to drain water and for services.

 

Surrounding Development

 

The site is surrounded to the west and north by high density residential development, with the area under going transition with some single dwelling houses still present in the streetscape.

 

The property to the north of the site is 3 Milray Street and is a single storey dwelling. This site is zoned R4 for high density development. On the western side of Milray Street is a 5 storey residential flat building.

 

To the east of the site, the rear boundary is shared with 12 Nelson Road which contains a single dwelling.This site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential.

 

Opposite the site on Kochia Lane is a 5 storey residential flat buildings which fronts Tryon Road. Further to the east, the Cromehurst School is located on the corner of Tryon Road and Nelson Road and also has a frontage to Kochia Lane. This site is zoned SP 2 Infrastructure.

 

To the west of the site are the Lindfield Town Centre and Lindfield Railway Station, construction is under way on properties fronting Lindfield Avenue which includes mixed use development.

 

The Proposal

 

The application proposed demolition of existing structures and construction of 17 town houses, basement parking and landscaping works. The proposed works include:

 

Basement RL86.30

 

·     20 residential parking spaces and 2 visitor parking spaces

·     Vehicle access ramp, turning bay, delivery/garbage truck parking area

·     Waste storage room

·     3 access stairways to ground floor common areas

·     Lift access

 

Ground floor RL89.50/89.00

 

·     1 adaptable visitor parking space located at the eastern corner of the site

·     Open plan family, dining, kitchen and WC

·     Lift access

·     Rear alfresco area

·     Front porch as main entry from Kochia Lane with additional side porches to Townhouses 1 and 16

 

First floor RL93.05

 

·     Master bedroom 1 with ensuite and walk in robe, access to rear balcony.

·     Townhouses 1 and 16 have side balconies

·     Maintain bathroom and study nook

·     Bedroom 2 with front balcony access

·     Lift access

 

Second floor RL96.10

 

·     Living rooms with rear balcony access

·     Bathroom

·     Front balcony

·     Lift access

 

Vehicular access is proposed from Kochia Lane adjacent to the eastern boundary.

 

Amended plans and additional information dated 22 September and 14 October 2016

 

The amended plans proposed the following changes to the application and additional information:

 

·  deletion of one townhouse (16 townhouses now proposed)

·  increase separation between townhouses

·  deletion of off load area and adaptable visitor space adjacent to eastern side boundary

·  increase in setbacks from the east and northern boundaries

·  lowering of the development by maximum of 500mm

·  reconfiguration of basement and car parking layout

·  reconfiguration of townhouse to front Milray Street

·  changes to fire stairs

·  details of proposed lifts

·  amended landscape plan and arborist report

·  updated BASIX Certificate

·  updated stormwater management plans

·  reduction in Kochia Lane front setback to 3.8 metres

·  fencing along Kochia Lane reduced to 1.2 metres

·  changes to private open space

·  access report

·  adaptable layout plan

·  indicative construction and traffic management plan

·  traffic and parking assessment report

 

Amended plans and information dated 11 November 2016

 

·     amended BASIX certificate

·     amended landscape plan

·     amended stormwater plan

·     front fence details

·     architectural plans updated with fence changes

 

Amended plans and information 21 November 2016

 

·     corrected levels on northern elevation

·     townhouses 5 -12 lowered by 500mm

·     western and eastern internal elevations provided

 

Amended plans 21 December 2016

 

·     the FFL of Block B reduced by 500mm

·     the FFL of Block C reduced by 887mm

·     the FFL of the basement reduced at various points from RL86.30 to RL85.43

 

Amended plans 23 January 2017

 

·     levels shown on updated plans

 

Consultation

 

Community

 

In accordance with the notification controls of the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan, owners of surrounding properties were given notice of the application. In response, submissions from the following were received.

 

1.       Adrienne McGilvery - 38/9 Milray Street, Lindfield

2.       CJ and LJ Andrew – PO Box 263 Lindfield

 

The submissions raised the following issues:

 

Insufficient car parking and impacts upon Milray Street

 

The proposal provides for a compliant number of parking spaces in accordance with the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.

 

Traffic impacts on Milray Street

 

The proposal is not considered to result in any adverse impacts upon traffic within Milray Street. The proposal provides for the minimum required number off street parking spaces.

 

Loss of trees

 

The trees proposed to be removed have low retention value, are exempt species or are centrally located where they unreasonably prevent development.

 

A landscape plan which includes the provision of new trees and plantings is recommended for approval which ensures replacement vegetation is provided on site.

 

Amended plans dated 22 September, 14 October, 11 November 2016 and 21 November 2016

 

The amended plans were not notified to surrounding residents as the proposed amendments do not result in a greater environmental impact than the original proposal.

 

Within Council

 

Urban Design

 

Council's urban design consultant commented on the proposal as follows:

 

“Given the isolated nature of the site with another DA submitted for 3-5 Milray, some leniency could be applied to certain aspects of the application – notably the front setback. There are some minor non compliances with Council setback requirements, notably at the rear of the site where a 6 metre setback would ordinarily be required, and to several elevated ground floor terraces due to the topography of the site.

 

While the proposal would be assessed under Council’s multi-dwelling provisions, the building typology is more closely aligned with terrace (row) housing (albeit over a basement carpark) and accordingly a strategy that provides individual gardens instead of a centralised communal space (which would be required under Council’s controls for multi-unit developments for proposals with more than 10 dwellings) would be appropriate due to the long proportion of the site.

 

While the scale of the development and approach to providing multiple individual addresses on the laneway is inconsistent with the existing subdivision pattern and pattern of recently amalgamated development sites, the multi-dwelling housing approach is a suitable building type for redevelopment of the isolated lot.

 

There are some issues that remain despite several amendments to the proposal and similar commentary provided in earlier advice. The outstanding issues:

 

·     Privacy across the northern boundary remains a concern with the ‘ground floor’ terraces of units 1-5 and 15-16 exceeding 1.5 metres above the immediately adjoining ground level. With the terraces orientated north and with only 4 metres from the northern boundary, there is potential for overlooking and privacy to be compromised. The proposed vegetation along the northern boundary of 1 Milray Street (as indicated on the landscape plan) will assist with ameliorating the impacts.

 

·     There is some opportunity to decrease the height of the eastern (townhouses 13-16) by grading the carpark at 1:20 to reduce the height of the rear terraces and living areas (without reducing the kitchen/entry level) but the western end of the building cannot be readily reduced due to the already maximum grade of the ramp and its relationship to the carpark and the building over. To address the privacy issues at the western end of the building would require more substantial reconfiguration, which it appears the applicant is reluctant to undertake, and may result in the further loss of an apartment.

 

·     Inconsistencies remain between landscape plans (unnumbered) the ground floor plan (drawing DA02[4]) and fence details provided. These inconsistencies should be addressed to facilitate future approvals (CC & OC) but could be conditioned pending the desired fence line location along Kochia Lane.

 

Visual privacy – separation distances from the building (typically elevated balconies) to the northern boundary are 6 metres providing equity in sharing of building separation required by the Apartment Design Guide across the northern boundary. However, the elevated nature of the rear “alfresco” for townhouses 1 through 5 and 15 ad 16 (due to the site’s topography) creates a privacy issue across the northern (and to a lesser extent the eastern) boundary. In some cases the Alfresco is elevated 2 metres above ground and in all instances only 4 metres from the northern boundary.

 

Furthermore, the windows to the townhouse across each of the external basement stair links look directly into each other and would benefit from being staggered.

 

Solar and daylight access – With the living rooms of all the townhouses facing north, the applicant has demonstrated that solar access can be achieved for at least the 2 hour prescribed minimum. The adjoining development proposal at 3-5 Milray Street may compromise solar access, but the opportunities for solar gain have been maximised by orienting the living rooms north and the provision of a second elevated living room.

 

Private open space and balconies – it appears the ground floor terrace (16.3m²) provides an appropriate depth for furnishing but does not provide the 20m² required by Council’s DCP as the primary private open space. While SEPP 65 (which is intended for apartment design) states 15m² for ground floor apartments, there is an expectation for a larger uesable area more consistent with Council’s requirements, particularly given the lack of any suitable communal open space and market expectations associated with row housing.

 

The elevated balcony (at the second floor) provides a furnishable dimension.

 

Planner’s comments: Control 4 of Part 6A.2 Building setbacks states that where dwellings are orientated towards side boundaries, the setback is to be at least 6 metres. Control 3 requires a minimum setback of 3.0 metres from any side boundary. The proposal provides a 3.1 metres setback from the eastern boundary. The townhouses achieve a 6 metres setback from the northern boundary with the allowable 4 metres encroachment of terraces. The proposal is consistent with the setback requirements in this regard.

 

Control C.1 Communal Open Space in control 1 states where more than 10 dwellings are proposed that do not address the street, communal open space is to be provided in accordance with the provisions of this control. Each townhouse fronts Kochia Lane and the proposal is not required to provided a communal open space area. In the amendments to the DCP in June 2016, the communal open space control was altered to apply to all development where more than 10 dwellings are proposed. The proposal is being considered against the earlier revision of the DCP.

 

The proposal has been amended by lowering the basement grades which has resulted in an overall reduction in the height of Block B by 500mm and Block C by 887mm which ensures that the private open space of the townhouses are located closer to natural ground level. 

 

The proposal has been amended to reduce the height of the development above natural ground ranging between 500mm – 887mm. The proposal is not considered to result in an unacceptable relationship with the northern boundary. Council has undertaken a Pre DA at 3-5 Milray Street of which a residential flat building is proposed. There were several fundamental issues identified in this proposal including a non compliant setback.

 

Council has been provided with front fence detail plans which shows a 1.2 metres high slatted fence along the Milray Street and Kochia Lane. The landscape plan notates the 1.2 metres high slatted fence to Archtiect’s elevations along the Kochia Lane and Milray Street frontages.

 

Landscape

 

Council's Landscape and Tree Assessment Officer commented on the proposal as follows:

 

Tree impacts

 

Numerous trees are proposed to be removed across the site. An arboricultural impact assessment report has been submitted with the application.

 

·      The removal of T3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 32,  23, 24, 28, 31, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, and 50, is accepted. The identified trees have low retention value, are exempt species or are centrally located where they unreasonably inhibit development works as proposed by the zoning.

·      T8 Washingtonia robusta (Washington Palm) located within the site frontage and within a proposed soft landscape area, can be retained despite the proposed encroachment of development works as the species is tolerant of development impact due to its root structure.

·      T25 Taxodium distichum (Swamp Cypress) despite its previously identified landscape value and significance the tree has been removed.

·      T26 Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree) located adjacent to the northern site boundary is assessed as having good vigour and moderate landscape significance despite having an infestation of English Ivy (that should be removed) and medium ULE (Useful Life Expectancy). The trees location adjacent to the northern site boundary ensures that with design consideration it can be retained, in accordance with the KLCDCP6A.5 Objectives.

·      T45 Araucaria columnaris (Cook’s Pine) located adjacent to the northeast site corner. The tree is assessed as being in good health and condition with a phototrophic lean to the north. The tree is shown to be removed as it conflicts with proposed drainage works. The trees removal is accepted.

·      The development will result in the removal of three street trees within the Milray St road reserve, T3 & T4 Callistemon viminalis (Weeping Bottlebrush) & T5 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum). The removal of these trees is accepted as they do not have broader landscape significance and have been previously lopped for overhead wires resulting in poor structural form.

 

Landscape plan/tree replenishment

 

·      Planting within the eastern setback is restricted to a single row planting. This is inadequate to provide amenity to the site and neighbouring properties. It is recommended the planting proposed be supplemented with fastigiate medium sized trees. This is conditioned.

·      The planting of Blueberry Ash as a specimen tree along the Kochia Lane site frontage is not supported. The species is an understorey tree species and not generally used as a specimen tree due to its open form and habit. It is assessed there are more appropriate specimen tree species that would contribute positively to the streetscape and landscape character such as Manchurian Pear, or Crepe Myrtle.

 

An amended landscape plan addressing the above requirements is required to be submitted prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate (Condition 20).

 

Stormwater plan

This is acceptable on landscape grounds with the current proposed design.

 

BASIX

Numerous landscape area requirements are detailed within the submitted BASIX certificate #715306M_07 dated 30/10/2016. The proposal is consistent with the BASIX certificate.

 

Deep soil

 

KLCDCP2012 and KLCDCP (amended 24/06/2016) defines deep soil landscaping as the soft landscaped part of the site area that is not occupied by any structure, whether above or below ground, except for minor structures such as paths to 1.2 metres, pipes of 300mm or less, lightweight fences, drainage pits <1m², has a minimum width of 2.0 metres, is not used for car parking, and can include water sensitive urban design.

 

KLCDCP6A.5 requires a minimum 40% of the site area to be deep soil. For a site of 2,564m², a minimum 1,025.6m² is required. By the applicant’s calculations the proposed development will result in a deep soil landscape area of 1025.8m².

 

KLCDCP6A.6 as amended in June 2016, (control 1) requires multi-dwelling housing development to have a minimum deep soil landscaping area of 40% of the site area provided within common areas only. The amended proposal is inconsistent with this control as deep soil landscape area located within private courtyards has been included within the calculable area. This differs from the previous DCP Deep Soil Area Control which included landscape areas within private courtyards.

 

The assessing landscape officer is in disagreement with the areas included within the deep soil calculations. The areas in dispute include:

 

·      Garden beds between entry porches for Units 2-16 <2.0m wide (as per definition/approx. 11m²)

·      The proposed retaining walls (considered a structure as per definition)

 

These areas total approximately 14m² and result in a non-compliance with the minimum deep soil landscape area as required by KLCDCP2012 of some 0.6%.

 

Notwithstanding, the non-compliance with the DCP numeric control is minor and is acceptable as the objectives of the control are satisfied.

 

Conclusion

The proposal is acceptable on landscape grounds, subject to recommended conditions.

 

Engineering

 

Council's Development Engineer commented on the proposal as follows:

 

Water management

 

The subject site is relatively flat with a moderate cross fall of approximately 1.5m. Whilst a portion of the site has access to a drainage easement at the rear northern boundary through the downstream property to Council’s public drainage system, the applicant has opted to drain the development site to Kochia Lane. Given that the discharge to the kerb and gutter is not directly outside the frontage of the development, a minor variation to the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP Part 24B.2(4) would be accepted in this instance. This would allow sufficient gravity fall from the detention facility to the street kerb and gutter.

 

The stormwater plans show all roof areas to be collected and conveyed to two (2) separate combined detention / retention tanks comprising a total of 51.1m3 and 20,000L, respectively, located 2.7m above the basement floor level.

 

The on-site detention requirements described in Volume C Part 24C.5 of the DCP have been satisfied.

 

According to the Stream Flow Control & Stormwater Quality Report, dated 12 October 2016 and prepared by ACOR Consultants, a 10,500L rainwater storage volume would be adequate to satisfy the 50% reduction in runoff days required under Part 24C.3 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP.  The design provides a 20,000L rainwater tank which also satisfies the BASIX Certificate water commitments. Re-use of stored rainwater will be for toilet use and irrigation of 960 square metres of common landscaped area on the site. This will satisfy Council’s streamflow objectives.

 

Water quality measures are provided and MUSIC Modelling has been submitted. The stormwater treatment standards / targets outlined in Part 24C.6 of the Ku-ring-gai DCP would be achieved by the proposed treatment train.

 

 

Vehicular access and accommodation arrangements

 

The site is zoned ‘R4’ under the Local Centres LEP. The parking provisions have been determined using Ku-ring-gai Council Local Centres Development Control Plan for a residential flat building. The site is located within 400m walking distance from Lindfield Railway Station.  According to the Ku-ring-gai Council Local Centres DCP Volume A Part 7B.1-9‘Car Parking Rates’, the total parking spaces required would be a minimum 15 spaces and maximum 19 spaces.

 

The development seeks to provide 30 off-street parking spaces, comprising 26 residents’ spaces (including 2 adaptable spaces) and 4 visitor spaces (includes 1 accessible visitor). The parking requirements have been met.

 

A temporary service /car wash bay space has been provided within the basement and satisfies the minimum dimension of 3.5m x 6m as required in Part 6B.2 of the Local Centres DCP. This space is also doubles up as a disabled visitor space, which is acceptable.

 

The disabled visitor parking space width of 2.4m plus 2.4m shared area complies with AS2890.6:2009 as well as the dimensions of the designated accessible car space referred to by the Access Consultant being a minimum of 3.8m to comply with AS4299-1995.

 

Vehicular access to the car park is to be provided via a new single 3.8m wide entry / exit driveway which satisfies the requirements of Volume C Part 22.2 of the DCP. The use of the single lane driveway and ramp is also compliant with Clause 3.2.2 of AS2890.1:2004 given that the traffic flows will be in the order of 4 peak hour vehicle movements which are significantly low.

 

Condition 10 requires  that ‘No Parking’ restrictions be introduced along the site frontage of Milray Street adjacent to the driveway crossing to ensure pedestrian safety and provide vehicle sightlines.

 

The dimensions of the parking bays, ramp grades, aisle widths and driveway gradients comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 (2004) “Off-Street car parking”. The parallel parking spaces are also compliant with AS2890.1:2004 Section 2.4.4 (b) (iii) ‘Parallel parking in parking aisles’.

 

Waste collection

 

The development allows a garbage truck to enter and depart the garbage/room recycle storage area in a forward direction. The turning manoeuvrability is suitable for the small waste collection vehicle as shown by the swept paths within the Appendix of the Traffic Report.

 

A driveway longitudinal section has been submitted which demonstrates the minimum head height of 2.6m to access the basement area. The driveway grade of 20% shown for the small waste collection vehicle also complies with requirements of Volume C Part 23.7 of the Local Centres DCP.

 

The proposed 16x240L bins for waste, paper and recycling satisfy the minimum bin requirements.

 

Construction management

 

An indicative construction management plan has been submitted which is to be amended prior to the commencement of any works on site. The vehicle access routes would need to be modified. Access is proposed via Kochia Lane from Nelson Road and exit onto Milray Street. The use of Kochia Lane during all stages of construction activity is not supported. Given the narrow width of the laneway and disruption to residential driveways and school play area, it is required that the CTMP be amended to show a temporary driveway off Milray Street in the location of the new driveway access for the use of construction related vehicles. 

 

The CTMP would need to show truck routes and turning path diagrams demonstrating how construction vehicles for all stages of development will turn into and out of the site. 

 

A Works Zone will be required along the Milray Street frontage, and a condition is recommended to that effect, including the need for approval by Councils Traffic Committee and the payment of the necessary fees (Condition 10). 

 

Further, Condition 9 requires that no construction vehicles movements are to occur during the school drop-off (8.00am to 9.30am) and pick-up hours (2.30pm to 4.00pm) on school days.

 

Impacts on Council infrastructure

 

The existing footpath along the frontage of Milray Street is in a satisfactory condition. The applicant will be required to construct a new footpath along the Kochia Lane site frontage.

 

Geotechnical investigation

 

A geotechnical site assessment has been carried out which comprised drilling of boreholes to depths of 6 metres.

 

Subsurface conditions comprised fill up to a depth of 0.4m was measured. Residual clay was encountered below fill/topsoil in all boreholes. Weathered shale bedrock was encountered beneath the shaly clay at 2.5m and 2.95m with sandstone bedrock encountered below the shale at depths of 5.5m and 5.0m respectively within the boreholes. No groundwater was encountered during and on completion of drilling.

 

The geotechnical recommendations regarding excavation support, vibration monitoring, dilapidation reporting of adjoining buildings and foundation design shall be carried out during construction as specified within the report. It is also recommended that further geotechnical input be obtained in particular groundwater monitoring, prior to commencement of bulk excavation (Conditions 7, 8 and 48).

 

Conclusion

 

The application is acceptable on engineering grounds, subject to conditions.”

 

Planner’s comment: The amended plans were referred to Council’s Development Engineer who also found them to be satisfied, subject to conditions of consent.

 

Statutory Provisions

 

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

 

Clause 5 establishes the objects of the Act, which includes under Clause 5(a)(ii) the promotion and coordination of the orderly and economic use and development of land. The proposal seeks to consolidate three allotments into one and construct 16 townhouses. Condition 18 is recommended requiring the lot consolidation prior to the issue of the construction certificate and the proposal is considered to be consistent with the Objects of the Act.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

 

The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case

 

Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005

 

Matters for consideration under SREP 2005 include biodiversity, ecology and environmental protection, public access to and scenic qualities of foreshores and waterways, maintenance of views, control of boat facilities and maintenance of a working harbour. The proposal is not in close proximity to, or within view, of a waterway or wetland and is considered satisfactory. Water re-use measures will minimise the impact on downstream waterways.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

A valid BASIX certificate has been submitted. The certificate demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the SEPP and adequately reflects all amendments to the application.

 

Local Content (LEP, KPSO, etc)

 

Ku-ring-gai LEP (Local Centres) 2012

 

Zoning and permissibility:

 

The site is zoned R4 High Density Residential. The proposed development is defined as multi dwelling housing and is permissible in the zone. 

 

multi dwelling housing means 3 or more dwellings (whether attached or detached) on one lot of land, each with access at ground level, but does not include a residential flat building.

 

Residential zone objectives:

 

The objectives for the R4 High Density Residential Zone are:

 

·     To provide for the housing needs of the community within a high density residential environment.

·     To provide a variety of housing types within a high density residential environment.

·     To enable other land uses that provides facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

·     To provide for high density residential housing close to public transport, services and employment opportunities.

 

The proposed development upholds the zone objectives.

 

Development standards:

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Height of buildings:  17.5m

12.82m

YES

Floor space ratio (FSR):  1.3:1(3339.1m²)

1.0:1 (2560.97m²)

YES

Site requirements for multi dwelling housing and residential flat buildings: 30m width and 2400m²

112.4 metres and 2564m²

YES

 

Part 5 Miscellaneous provisions

 

Clause 5.9 – Preservation of trees or vegetation

 

Council’s Landscape Development Officer is satisfied that the proposed development will not unduly impact upon any existing significant trees or vegetation, subject to conditions.

 

Part 6 Additional local provisions

 

Clause 6.1 – Earthworks

 

The proposed development will not restrict the existing or future use of the site, adversely impact on neighbouring amenity, the quality of the water table or disturb any known relics. Additionally, the fill to be removed will be disposed of appropriately.

 

Clause 6.2 - Stormwater and water sensitive urban design

 

Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed development has been designed to manage urban stormwater as per the requirements of the LEP, subject to conditions.

 

Clause 6.5 – Site requirements for multi dwelling housing and residential flat buildings

 

The subject site has an area of 2564m2 and a frontage of 112.4 metres to Kochia Lane. The site meets the 1800m2 minimum site requirement and the 33 metres minimum frontage requirement for multi dwelling development.

 

Policy Provisions (DCPs, Council policies, strategies and management plans)

 

Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan

Volume A

 

The development application was lodged on 11 April 2016. The Local Centres DCP was amended and came into effect on 24 June 2016. There are no savings provisions in the amended DCP for applications already lodged and under assessment. As such, the proposal has been designed and the preliminary assessment was made against the now superseded Development Control Plan. The proposal has been assessed against the amended DCP. Where there is a significant departure between the superseded and amended DCP controls it has been discussed.

 

COMPLIANCE TABLE

Development control

Proposed

Complies

Volume A

Part 6 Multi Dwelling Housing Controls

Part 6A Site Design

6A.1 Local Character and Streetscape

All multi dwelling housing developments are to be designed by an architect registered with the NSW Architects Registration Board.

Giles Tribe Architects – Stuart Hill 6459

YES

All multi dwelling housing developments are to demonstrate how they provide:

i) a garden setting with buildings surrounded by landscaped gardens, including canopy trees, on all sides;

ii) a transition in built form between single dwelling residential buildings and high density apartment buildings.

The proposal provides for an acceptable landscape setting to each boundary and provides an acceptable transition to the adjoining R2 land.

YES

The appearance of the development is to maintain the local visual character by considering the following elements:

i) visibility of on-site development when viewed from the street, public reserves and adjacent properties; and

ii) relationship to the scale, layout and character of the tree dominated streetscape of Ku-ring-gai.

The proposal provides for a three storey scale which is sympathetic to the adjoining R2 land.

YES

6A.2 - Site layout

Site layout responds to site analysis

 

 

YES

Dwelling with a frontage to the street must address the street

 

Townhouses front Kochia Lane. Corner apartment frontage to Milray Street

YES

 

Where a site has two or more frontages, the buildings are to address and provide dwelling door entry points from all street frontages.

Dwellings front Milray Street and Kochia Lane

YES

Soft landscaping, including canopy trees, is to be provided between onsite buildings, fences and courtyard walls

Landscaping and planter boxes provided between buildings, fences and courtyard walls

YES

Hard surface areas minimised to maximise landscaping

 

Hard surfaces have been minimised.

YES

No long straight driveways and buildings and fences are staggered

 

Driveway from Milray Street

YES

Single pedestrian entry provided from street level

 

Individual entry points provided to each dwelling in addition to two common entrances from Kochia Lane as a result of the 112.4 metres frontage.

NO

 

Building layout based on either Figure 6A.1-1, Figure 6A.2-1 or Figure 6A.2-3

 

The site dimensions result in a narrow but long site which is inconsistent with the figures but necessitates site specific design.

NO

 

All development is to have a building alignment parallel to the street, or in alignment with existing setback patterns where the pattern is not likely to change, as in Figure 6A.2-5.

Setback complies with Milray Street and is consistent with the setback pattern to Kochia Lane.

 

The remaining property fronts Nelson Road and zoned R2 and Kochia Lane would be the secondary frontage in which a setback of 3.8m would be required. The proposal matches this control requirement.

YES

Stair lifts and inclinators are not permitted in any setback area and are not to be visible to any street frontage or public domain area.

None proposed

YES

6A.3 Building setback

10m from primary street boundary (min)

 

12.2m from Milray Street and 3.8 metres from Kochia Lane

YES

8m from the secondary street boundary on corner sites within a 6-8m articulation zone

No more than 40% of building occupies articulation zone

 

3.8m from Kochia Lane

 

 

Non compliant setback proposal therefore unable to achieve 40% compliance

NO

 

 

NO

A minimum setback of 3.0m is to be provided from any side boundary where the side elevation has non-habitable rooms only.

Where a pedestrian pathway is located within this type of side setback, the minimum side setbacks are to be increased by the width of that path.

3.1m from eastern side

NO

 

Where the dwellings are oriented towards side boundaries and/or have openings to habitable rooms towards side boundaries, the setback is to be a minimum of 6.0m.

3.1m from eastern side with habitable rooms

NO

6m rear setback (min) For corner sites one boundary is to be nominated as a rear boundary.

 

The northern boundary is considered to be the rear 

NO

Basement areas are to be consolidated under the building footprint and meet the same building setback

Basement is consolidated beneath building footprint

YES

 

No driveways are to be located in side or rear setback areas including within the side setback areas in front of the building line.

Driveway located within rear setback

NO

Ground floor private terraces/courtyards may encroach into the required street, side and rear setback areas only where deep soil landscaping requirements are met. The encroachments are to retain a minimum setback to the courtyard wall of:

i) 8.0m from the Primary street boundary;

ii) 4.0m from the Secondary street boundary;

iii) 3.0m from any side boundary; and

iv) 4.0m from the rear boundary;

 

 

 

>8m

1.0m

3.1m

4m from north

 

Private terraces proposed to northern boundary but proposal does not meet deep soil requirement. 

 

 

 

YES

NO

YES

YES

 

NO

Balconies may encroach only into front and rear setbacks provided they project no more than 1.5m from the building line.

Rear terraces project 3m

NO

6A.4 Building separation

The minimum separation between residential buildings on the same development site is to comply with the following controls, as in

Figure 6A.4-1:

i) 12.0m between habitable rooms/balconies;

ii) 9.0m between habitable room/balcony and non-habitable room;

iii) 6.0m between a habitable room and a blank wall;

iv) 6.0m between non-habitable rooms;

v) 6.0m between a blank wall and a non-habitable room;

vi) 4.0m between blank walls.

 

 

4.0m between ensuites at common corridor

4.0m between bedroom 2 windows

 

 

4.0m

 

 

4.0m

 

 

 

YES

 

NO

 

 

NO

 

YES

YES

 

6A.4 Site coverage

40%(1025.6m²)

46.9%(1203m²)

NO

6A.5 Deep soil landscaping

Deep soil landscaping area of min 40% provided within common areas only

39.4%

NO

Deep soil areas provided:

·   To all side boundaries

·   Of min 4m width along rear boundary within common area (northern boundary)

 

Deep soil provided to each boundaries. 4 metres depth from northern boundary.

 

YES

YES

Deep soil landscaping is to support the planting of substantial trees to the streetscape.

Substantial trees provided to streetscape

YES

Screen planting is to soften and reduce dominance of walls and fences.

Screen planting softens proposed walls and fences

YES

Driveways are not to dominate the street setback area. Deep soil landscaping areas in the street setback are to be maximised.

Proposed driveway does not dominate and appropriate landscaping provided

YES

Lots with the following sizes are to support a minimum number of tall trees capable of attaining a mature height of 13m on shale, transitional soils or 10m on sandstone derived soils:

 

1801m2 or more: 1 per 300m2 of site area or part thereof

 

9 trees required.

YES

Part 6B Access and Parking

6B.1 Vehicle access

Driveway located 3m (min) from side boundary and separated by a continuous landscaped verge & screen planting to the neighbouring development

 

3.0m from north

YES

One driveway (max)

 

One from Milray Street

YES

Driveway designed to avoid straight, long gun barrel appearance by use of landscaping and variations in alignment

 

Yes length of 12.2 metres only.

YES

Driveways are to be designed to avoid a straight, gun barrel appearance by using appropriate landscaping and variations in

alignment.

Driveway length kept to a minimum to avoid gun barrel appearance

YES

On-site vehicle turning areas designed to permit turning in a single reversing movement

 

Turning areas permit turning in single movement

YES

On-site vehicle turning areas located within the basement

 

Within basement

YES

Waste and recycling rooms are to be provided within the basement, with a 2.6m (min) ceiling height along path of travel from street to residential waste collection and manoeuvring area and kept free of overhead ducts, services or other obstructions

 

Bin enclosure provided with 2.6m ceiling

YES

6B.2 Car parking provision

All multi dwelling housing development is to provide on-site parking within the basement.

Parking provided within basement

YES

Basement car parking consolidated under building footprint

 

Under footprint

YES

The basement car park does not project more than 1m above existing ground level

Basement protrudes 2.4metres

NO

 

The use of single lane tunnels and single lane spiral ramps is not permitted. Double lane spiral ramps may be allowed where there are no other options, but can only link a maximum of 2 basement levels.

Single level basement 6.3m in width

YES

Single lane aisles, straight ramps and tunnels are to be a maximum of 12.0m in length

6.3m aisle width

YES

Direct access is to be provided from basement car parks to dwelling entry points; and, wherever possible direct access is to be provided from basement parking into each individual dwelling.

Lifts provided to each townhouse

YES

Car park entry is to be integrated within the building and located behind the building line.

Integrated and behind building line

YES

Car parking spaces, circulation areas, roadways and ramps comply with AS2890.1

 

Proposal complies with AS2890.1

YES

Car parking rates:

 

Within 400m of a railway station:

1 bedroom unit: 1 space min, 1 space max

2 bedroom unit: 1 space min, 1.5 spaces max

3 or more bedroom unit: 1 space min, 2 spaces max

 

For all other locations, see parking rates at Volume C Part 2R.2

 

 

The development provides 30 off-street parking spaces, comprising 26 residents’ spaces (including 2 adaptable spaces) and 4 visitor spaces (includes 1 accessible visitor).

 

 

 

YES

Visitor parking: 1 space per 4 dwellings or part thereof

 

1 visitor space to be adaptable by complying with dimensional and locational requirements of AS2890.6.

 

One visitor space to be provided with tap to make provision for on-site car washing

 

4 required and 4 provided

 

YES

 

 

YES

 

 

 

YES

Clearly signposted space for temporary parking of service and removalist vehicles with min. dimension of 3.5m x 6m and min. manoeuvring area 7m wide (where not provided, one of visitor spaces may be used if it meets these dimensions)

 

Loading and adaptable visitor provided within basement

YES

 

6B.3 Bicycle parking provision

Where basement parking is provided:

 

1 bicycle parking space per 5 units (or part thereof) for residents within residential car park area; and

1 bicycle parking space (in the form of a bicycle rail) per 10 units (or part thereof) for visitors within visitor car park area

 

 

 

Bicycle area provided -6 required

 

 

 

 

 

YES

 

 

 

 

Part 6C. Building Design and Sustainability

6C.1 Communal open space

Where more than 10 dwellings are proposed, one Primary communal open space is to be provided as follows, and as in Figure 6C1.-1:

i) have a minimum area of 72.0m2 ; and

ii) have a minimum dimension of 8.0m.

No communal open space is proposed 

NO

Shared facilities such as barbecue facilities, shade structures, play equipment and seating, are to be provided within the Primary communal open space. Placement of these facilities are to consider the privacy and amenity of dwellings adjacent to the communal open space. Seating is to be provided within the Secondary communal open space.

No communal open space is proposed 

NO

All communal open space is to be located at ground level behind the building line and be screened from the street by the built form.

No communal open space is proposed 

NO

At least 50% of the area of the Primary and Secondary communal open space is to receive direct sunlight for at least three hours between 9am and 3pm at mid winter.

No communal open space is proposed 

NO

6C.2 Private open space

A minimum private open space of 25.0m2 internal dimension is to be provided to each dwelling within the multi-dwelling housing

development, as in Figure 6C.2-2. The private open space is to:

i) have a minimum internal dimension of 4.0m;

ii) have direct level access from the living/dining area;

iii) provide a consolidated paved area of 12.0m2 and a minimum width of 3.0m to accommodate a table and 6 chairs directly accessible from the living/dining area;

iv) provide a 4.0m2 minimum landscaped area/planter bed for gardening.

 

32m²

16.3m²

 

5m

 

Directly accessible from living area

3m

 

YES

 

YES

 

 

 

YES

 

The private open space to each dwelling may be provided as a maximum of 2 separate spaces only if the Primary private open

space is a minimum 20m2 in area, and meets all the criteria in 6C.2(1)i-iv. The remaining Secondary private open space is to have

a minimum internal dimension of 2m.

>20m²

YES

Private open space (outdoor) for ground floor dwellings is differentiated from common areas by:

i)     change in level and/or:

ii)    screen planting such as hedges or shrubs and/or;

iii)   fence/wall to max height of 1.8m.  Any solid wall component to have max 1.2m height with at least 30% transparent component above

 

Terraces are elevated between 730mm – 2.2m

Planting proposed to differentiate and privacy screens   

YES

Gates provided to common area

 

 

N/A

Private open space, courtyard and terrace wall and fence heights are not to exceed:

i) 1.2m to any street frontage;

ii) 1.8m to any side or rear boundary, with a maximum 1.2m high solid component and a minimum 30% transparent component

above.

1.6m above alfresco dining area

YES

6C.3 Solar access 

Buildings are to be oriented to optimise the northern aspect.

Rear living areas and POS orientated towards north

YES

Dwellings receive min 3 hours direct sunlight to at least one living room & primary private open space between 9am - 3pm on 21st June

 

Living rooms at second floor

YES

 

All habitable rooms are to have a window in an external wall that is directly visible from every part of the room. Snorkel windows are not permitted.

No snorkel windows proposed. Habitable rooms have window.

YES

Min. 3 hours between 9am – 3pm on 21st June to living areas and principal portion of private open space of existing residential flat buildings and multi-dwelling housing on adjoining lots and residential development in adjoining lower density zones

 

Due to north-south orientation of the allotment, the adjoining R2 property at 12 Nelson Road is maintained with 3 hours of solar access

YES

Overshadowing does not compromise the development potential of the adjoining under-developed site(s)

 

The site does not overshadow 3 Milray Street which is zoned R4 and contains a single dwelling.

YES

All development utilise shading and glare control

 

 

YES

6C.4 Natural ventilation

All dwellings have natural cross ventilation

 

Cross ventilation achieved

YES

All habitable rooms have windows or doors that can be opened and closed

 

Windows and doors provided

 

YES

At least 25% of all kitchens are immediately adjacent to an operable window

 

All kitchens

YES

All habitable rooms are naturally ventilated without relying solely on lightwells or skylights

Windows and doors provided

YES

6C.5 Dwelling mix and accessibility

A range of dwelling sizes and a mix of types which includes two, three and four bedroom dwellings are to be provided within the

development

All townhouses are 2 bedroom

NO

All multi-dwelling housing development is to be designed to Silver Level under the Livable Housing Design Guidelines.

 

NO

At least 15% or part thereof, of all multi-dwelling housing are to be designed to Platinum Level under the Livable Housing Design

Guidelines.

2 townhouses designed as adaptable 14 and 4.

NO

At least 70% of all dwellings are to be visitable.

>70%

YES

6C.6 Dwelling placement and room design

Subterranean rooms are not permitted to any part of the dwelling. The floor level of all rooms is to be located above finished ground

level.

No subterranean rooms proposed

YES

No dwellings are to be accommodated as a result of excavation.

No townhouses occur as a result of excavation

YES

The maximum habitable room depth is 8.0m from a window in an external wall.

<8m

YES

Maximum internal plan depth of a dwelling is to be 14m from glass line to glass line

 

12.2m

YES

 

Living areas has a 4m dimension (min)

 

Min 5m

YES

Dining area has 4m internal plan dimension (min)

 

>4m

YES

Where living and dining rooms are combined in an open plan, a minimum internal plan dimension of 8.0m is to be provided across both areas, with the secondary plan dimension remaining at 4.0m as in Figure 6C.6-2 to Figure 6C.6-4.

8m

YES

Where kitchen areas are included within open plan dining and living areas, the kitchen area and the circulation area for the kitchen is to be separate and excluded from the measurement of living room and dining room area dimensions in 6C.6(14).

Kitchen separate to living and dining

YES

All bedrooms are to have a minimum internal plan dimension of 3.0m, as in Figure 6C.6-3.

3m

YES

2 bedrooms – min 95m² and 2 bathrooms

>75m² and two bathrooms

YES

Where more than one bathroom is provided, one bathroom is to be fitted with a bathtub.

Bathtub provided first floor ensuite

YES

All kitchens are to provide a minimum clear workbench surface of 0.6x2.0m. This may be provided as two surfaces of minimum 0.6x1.0m each.

0.6m x 2 x 1.0m

YES

6C.7 Building entries and internal pathways

Entry path is directly accessible and visible from the street

 

Each townhouse has own street entrance plus 2 communal from Kochia Lane

YES

All ground floor entries to dwellings are to be located no more than 1.0m above natural ground level. Any falls in the ground level are to be accommodated within the design of the dwelling by utilising split levels.

<1m above ground entries

YES

Building entry pathways are to be minimum 1.2m wide and located within the common area with a minimum dimension of 1.2m on either side for landscape planting. All other internal pathways are to be minimum 1.2m wide with a minimum dimension of 0.6m on either side for landscape planting.

>1.2m in width

YES

Building entry is integrated with building facade design. At street level, the entry is to be articulated with awnings, porticos, recesses or projecting bays for clear identification

The communal entrances are sandstone classed and roofed providing separation of built form to clearly identify entrances

YES

All entries are well lit and designed to avoid any concealment or entrapment areas

4.0m wide entrance

YES

 

Designed to avoid light spill

 

YES

6C.8 Building facades and articulation

Buildings are to express the scale and mass of townhouse and villa development.

Townhouse scale proposed

YES

Building design and finish is to provide a variety of architectural character within the streetscape

Design provides for architectural character consistent with streetscape

YES

All facades are to achieve well-proportioned compositions utilising suitable architectural elements and treatments, including a variety of window openings

 

YES

Building length does not exceed 36m

32m

YES

 

All external walls longer than 14.0m are to be articulated by having a minimum 0.6m step in the building facade alignment (projection or indentation). Facades consisting of a single predominant finish or material and/or limited articulation will not be accepted.

Articulated and modulated built form

YES

Building facades are designed to respond to solar access by using solar protection elements such as eaves and louvres as environmental controls

 

YES

All building elements including shading devices and awnings are coordinated and integrated within the overall façade design

Integrated in design 

YES

Air conditioning units are not located on the building façade or on balconies or terraces

None shown on plans

N/A

No balconies run the full length of the building façade

Balconies do not run entire length of façade

YES

 

Balconies do not project more than 1.5m from the outermost wall of the building façade

Balconies at first floor 1.2m projection from external wall

YES

 

Blade walls are not the sole element used to provide articulation

The proposal provides for two 4 metre separations in the built form

YES

Street corners are addressed by giving

visual prominence to parts of building façade eg. Change in building articulation, material or colour, roof expression or height

Proposal has been designed to address the corner with townhouse

1 presenting to Milray Street

YES

6C.9 Building storeys

Multi-dwelling housing is to have a maximum of 3 storeys as illustrated in Figure 6C.9-1.

4 storeys including basement protrusion

NO

6C.10 Top Storey design and roof forms

The top storey of the building is to be incorporated into the roof space to make an attic floor level where possible. Where a flat roof is proposed, the design is not to resemble a residential apartment building form.

Top storey not within roof space to create attic 

NO

Service elements eg. Drainage pipes and communication devices are integrated into the overall design of the roof so as not to be visible from the public domain or any surrounding development

Condition 25

YES

Roof design responds to solar access by using eaves or skillion roofs

Skillion roofs

YES

Roof forms are modulated or broken, especially for long facades

Varied roof form and 4m break in building massing

YES

Solar panels are integrated into the roof line (where provided)

 

N/A

Balconies and terraces are not permitted above the ground and first floor levels of the building except to the street frontage.

Balconies at first and second levels

NO

Where the top storey is not incorporated within the roof form, it is to step back as follows:

i) a minimum of 2.0m from the front and rear building line of the floor below;

ii) a minimum of 0.6m from the building line of the floor below at the end walls, where the end walls at the top storey has no openings;

where end walls have openings, the step back is to be a minimum

of 2.0m from the building line of the floor below;

iii) access to balconies or terraces at the top storey may only be provided to the street elevation.

Level two not stepped back

NO

6C.11 Internal ceiling heights

Ceiling height for habitable room: 2.7m min (3.1)

3m

YES

Ceiling height for non-habitable room: 2.4m min (2.8m)

3m

YES

6C.12 Visual and acoustic privacy

Buildings designed to ensure privacy

Provision of obscure glazing, screening and off setting windows 

YES

No continuous transparent balustrades to balconies/terraces

Solid balustrades to balconies

YES

Screening between dwellings is integrated into the overall building design

Screening proposed at second level associated with balconies

YES

Landscaped screening is provided to adjoining sites

 

Landscape screening provided within setbacks 

YES

6C.13 Storage

Storage space is provided at the following minimum volumes:

10m³ for two bedroom dwellings

12m³ for dwellings with three or more bedrooms

Storage provided at first floor and basement of each townhouse 

YES

At least 50% of storage space is provided within the dwelling.  Remaining storage space  outside dwellings is separately allocated to relevant dwellings

Each townhouse has storage in first floor level in addition to private storage within individual garages within the basement

YES

6C.14 External air clothes drying facilities

One external air clothes drying area provided for each dwelling

Clothes drying area capable of being provided at ground floor of each of the townhouses

YES

External air clothes drying areas are screened from public areas and common areas

Capable of not being visible from public domain

YES

6C.15 Fencing

Front fences and walls (to public street) and side fences in the street setback are not higher than:

i)    0.9m closed construction (masonry, lapped and capped timber or brushwood fences)

ii)   1.2m open construction (open paling and picket fences)

Closed front fences with a max height of 1.8m and set back at least 2m from the front boundary will be considered where the site fronts a busy road.

1.2m aluminium slatted fence

1.264m at southern driveway entrance

NO

Fences and walls step down and follow natural contours of the site

Fences transitions in height in response to sites topography

YES

All fences to highlight entrances and one compatible with buildings, letterboxes and garbage storage areas

 

YES

External finishes are robust and graffiti resistant

 

YES

 

6A.1 Site layout

 

The proposal provides for individual street entrances in addition to two communal pedestrian points which is non compliant with the control requirement of a single pedestrian entry. The street frontage to Kochia Lane is 112.4 metres in length and the provision of two communal pedestrian entrances in considered reasonable on a site with such a long frontage. The proposed width of the property provides an opportunity to achieve individualised entrance points which will improve casual surveillance to Kochia Lane.

 

Control 6 identifies the preferred layouts for multi-dwelling housing. The proposal is non compliant in terms of the  secondary frontage setback to Kochia Lane. The control requires a setback of 6 metres with an articulation zone. The proposal provides for a 3.8 metres setback. The reduced setback is considered acceptable on merit for the reasons detailed below. The proposal provides for a specific design in response to the site dimensions which results in a narrow but long site which is not consistent with the sites represented in the preferred building layouts of the DCP.

 

6A.3 Building setback

 

The control requires the secondary street frontage to have a minimum setback of 6 metres. Kochia Lane is the secondary street frontage and the proposal provides for a 3.8 metres setback. The control requires corner sites to have a 6 – 8 metres articulation zone in which no more than 40% of the building occupies this articulation zone. Given the setback variation, the proposal cannot comply with this requirement.

 

The proposed setback of 3.8 metres is considered acceptable for the following reasons:

 

i)    The subject site occupies the entire frontage of Kochia Lane, with the exception of 12 Nelson Road which is zoned Residential R2 Low Density and also a corner allotment.

ii)   The applicable secondary frontage control for 12 Nelson Road is 3.8 metres with an average of 4.5 metres.

iii)  The proposed setback is consistent with the established and expected alignment of development on both the northern and southern side of Kochia Lane.

iv)  The proposal provides for landscaping within the Kochia Lane frontage to achieve the desired landscape outcome for the site.

v)   As Kochia Lane is the southern elevation of the property, the townhouses have been designed with north facing locate habitable rooms and private open spaces and the reduced setback does not lead to any adverse amenity impacts to the development on the southern side of Kochia Lane at 20-22 and 24 Tryon Road.

vi)  The proposal has a floor space ratio at 1.0:1 and is well below the 1.3:1 allowed and to require fully compliant setbacks would unreasonably limit the development potential of the site (the depth of townhouses would be limited between 8.8 metres and 10.8 metres).

vii) The proposal does not result in any significant amenity impacts as a result of the non compliant front setback.

 

The amendments to the DCP in June 2016 made the following changes:

 

·     A minimum setback of 3.0 metres to side boundaries only where non habitable rooms are proposed. Previously the control did not differentiate between the room type and just required a 3 metres setback

·     Where habitable rooms are towards the side boundaries the side setback is a minimum of 6 metres. Previously the controls did not distinguish the setback according room use.

·     A requirement for a nominated rear boundary on corner allotments. Previously, corner sites were assessed as having two front boundaries and two side boundaries

·     No driveway to be located within the rear or side setbacks areas. As there was previously no requirement for a rear setback the driveway was compliant with the required driveway setback of 3.0 metres.

·     Balconies may encroach only into front and rear setbacks provided they project no more than 1.5 metres from the building line. This would permit a rear setback of 4.5 metres. The proposed balconies encroach into the rear setback providing for a setback of 4.0 metres which was previously compliant.

 

As a result of the changes to controls, the proposal is non compliant with the required side and rear setback. The northern boundary is identified as the rear boundary and the proposal is setback a minimum of 4.0 metres to the elevated terraces. The side boundary to the east, is setback 3.1 metres and contains habitable rooms and therefore does not comply with the 6.0 metres setback requirement. The non compliances occur as a result of the amendments to the applicable control and do not result in any adverse impacts. It would be unreasonable to require a design to achieve compliance given the application was lodged and preliminary assessment undertaken under now superseded controls.

 

The control permits ground floor terraces and courtyards to encroach within the minimum setback areas. The control allows for a 4 metres encroachment from the secondary frontage. Given that the proposal provides for a 3.8 metres setback, the proposed building entrances and private terraces are set back 1 metre and do not comply with the control requirement. Nevertheless, the proposed setback is considered acceptable on merit for the reasons discussed above.

 

Private terraces/courtyards are permitted to encroach within the side setbacks only if deep soil planting requirements are met. Private terraces encroach within the side setbacks and the proposal does not meet deep soil requirement. The proposal does not comply as a result of the new definition of areas which are included in deep soil landscape area. Notwithstanding, the proposal achieves an acceptable landscape outcome on the site.  

 

6A.4 Building separation

 

The control requires a minimum separation up to the second storey of 6 metres between rooms and balconies and at the third storey it requires 12 metres separation between habitable rooms and balconies.

 

The proposal provides for 4.0 metres separation between Bedroom 2 of Townhouses 6 and 7, Townhouses 12 and 13 at Level One and 4 metres separation between balconies associated with Townhouses 6 and 7, 12 and 3 at Level Two. The proposal is therefore non compliant with the required building separation.

 

The window associated with Bedroom 2 of Townhouses 6 and 7 and 12 and 13 at Level One is a highlight window and does not result in a loss of visual privacy. The window has a sill height of 1.6 metres and is acceptable.

 

The eastern elevation of Block A and B and the western elevation of Block B and C is provided with a 600mm screen above the solid balustrade to prevent direct overlooking and this is considered acceptable.

 

The windows within the balcony recess achieve a separation distance of 10.1 metres from the adjoining window and this is satisfactory.

 

6A.5 Site coverage

 

The site is subject to a site coverage control of 40% (1025.6m²). The proposal results in a site coverage of 46.9% (1203m²) and does not comply. The objectives of the control are to ensure development is consistent with the landscape character of the area, to protect and improve tree canopy, to provide adequate space for planting of tall trees and other landscaping, to provide a balance of built form and soft landscaping and the minimise impervious surfaces that generate stormwater runoff.

 

The development achieves consistency with the landscape character of the area, provides for a satisfactory level of tree canopy and space for planting of trees and landscaping on site. Areas which are included in the site coverage calculation also contain landscape elements, in the communal access points the proposal provides for large planter boxes which whilst not excluded from the site coverage calculation, they do contribute to the balance sought between built form and soft landscaping. The proposal is considered acceptable with respect to stormwater management. The non compliance is not considered to be excessive and the proposal is acceptable on merit.

 

6A.6 Deep soil landscape

 

The control requires a minimum deep soil landscape area of 40% of the site area (1025.6m²). The applicant claims a deep soil landscape area of 1025.8m² is provided and the proposal satisfies the control requirement. Council does not agree with the calculation provided. The following areas should have been excluded but have not been:

 

·     Garden beds between entry porches for Units 2-16 <2.0m wide (as per definition/approx. 11m²)

·     The proposed retaining walls (considered a structure as per definition)

 

These areas occupy approximately 14m² which is greater than the available 0.2m² indicated by the applicant’s calculation. The proposal therefore provides a deep soil landscape area at 39.4%. However, this quantum, of deep soil area is considered acceptable on merit for the following reasons:

 

i)    The proposal provides for consolidated deep soil zones in the front and rear of the site

ii)   The proposal provides for quality landscaping that contributes to the garden character of Ku-ring-gai.

iii)  Most of the deep soil landscape area is provided within common areas.

iv)  The proposal provides for a mixture of medium and large trees which provide amenity, soften built form and contribute to the tree canopy.

v)   The non compliance is minor at 14m² on a site which is 2564m² in area and will not be discernible.

 

6B.2 Car parking provision

 

Control 2 requires the basement car park to not project more than 1m above existing ground level to the floor level of the storey immediately above. The proposed basement protrudes up to 2.4m above ground at the entrance to the basement and 44% of the basement projects more than 1 metre above the natural ground. This occurs as a result of the required grades to enter the basement, the required 2.6 metres clearance height for waste collection vehicles to enter the basement and the site’s topography. The basement protrusion occurs as a result of the site circumstances and is acceptable on merit. 

 

6C.1 Communal open space

 

The control requires a minimum communal open space of 70m² where more than 10 dwellings are provided. This control amended the previous control which only related to multi unit dwellings which do not front the streetscape. The proposal had been designed, lodged and the preliminary assessment undertaken with respect of the now superseded controls. As such, given the advanced state of the design and assessment it would be unreasonable to require the provision of communal open space which was not previously required. 

 

6C.5 Dwelling mix and accessibility

 

The control requires a mixture of dwelling types and for these to be designed in accordance with the Silver Level under the Livable Housing Design Guidelines. These controls previously did not apply to the development when it was lodged and forms part of the June amendments to the DCP. The proposal has been designed to provide 2 adaptable townhouses which complied with the previous requirement. It is considered unreasonable to require such redesign given the advanced stage of the application when the new DCP was adopted.

 

6C.9 Building storeys

 

The control restricts multi-dwelling development to a maximum of 3 storeys. The proposal technically results in a four storey building due to the basement protrusion which occurs due to the sites topography. This is a new control is part of the June amendments to the DCP. Given the proposal is of a compliant height and does not result in any adverse impacts the proposal despite the non compliance is acceptable on merit.

 

6C.10 Top storey design and roof forms

 

The proposed top storey is not within an attic roof form. The superseded DCP had a 60% top storey floor area requirement. The amendments to the DCP in June 2016, the 60% requirement has been removed and replaced with requiring minimum 2.0 metres setback from the front and rear building line of the storey below and a minimum 600mm where end walls have no openings. The objective of the control is to minimise visual bulk and ensure multi dwelling development does not have the appearance of a 3 storey residential flat building.

 

The proposal has been designed to achieve a reduced floor area at the second storey through a series of balconies at the rear northern elevation and in the south-eastern front corner of the built form. The centralised townhouses are stepped in from the floor level below 1.2 metres with the corner apartments having balconies extending to the building line below.

 

The amended controls also state that balconies and terraces are not permitted above the ground and first floor levels. The proposal has been designed to provide a 500mm balcony at the second storey. Given the balcony’s limited depth it is not considered to result in any adverse impacts.

 

The proposal is acceptable in this respect on merit.

 

6C.15 Fencing

 

The control limits the height of fencing to 1.2 metres. The proposed fencing along Kochia Lane is 1.2 metres in height. The proposal results in a minor non compliance at a height of 1.264 metres at the southern driveway entrance at the Milray Street frontage. This height non compliance is minimal and will not be discernible to the public domain. The non compliance occurs as a result of maintaining the existing levels within the Milray Street frontage and achieving a consistent fence height along the frontage.

 

Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan

Volume B

 

Part 2 – Site Design for Water Management

 

Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed development has been designed to control stormwater run-off as per the requirements of the DCP, subject to conditions.

 

Part 3 – Land Contamination

 

The site has a history of residential use and as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination and further investigation is not warranted in this case.

 

Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan

Volume C

 

Development control

Proposed

Complies

Part 1 Site Design

1.2 Earthworks and slope

Development consider site topography, drainage, soli landscapes, flora, fauna and bushfire hazard by:

·     Stepping buildings down the site

·     Locate finished ground level as close to the natural ground level as practicable

·     Level changes to occur primarily within building footprint

·     Minimum 0.6 metres width between retaining walls

·     Maintain existing ground level within 2m from any boundary

·     Limit slope for embankments to 1:6 (grassed) and 1:3 (soil stabilising vegetation)

·     No fill and excavation within sensitive environments

·     Minimise altered groundwater flows

 

 

YES

1.3 – Landscape Design

 

 

Appropriate and sensitive site planning and design

 

Landscape plan submitted and subject to further amendments required by Condition 20 is acceptable and consistent with control objectives.

YES

Planting between 100m – 300m from bushland

·     50% of trees and shrubs local native species

 

YES

Part 2 – Access and parking

2.1 Equitable Access

Compliance with DDA demonstrated

 

YES

Residential only

·     70% of dwellings in mixed use or high density developments must be visitable

·     Accommodation for > 10 persons other than sole occupancy units accessibility must be provided as follows:

 No of beds

Minimum no of accessible beds & associated facilities

10-20

2

21-49

3

50-99

5

100 or more

6

 

 

The proposal provides at grade access from Kochia Lane Townhouse 4 and 14 are identified as adaptable townhouses.

YES

2.2 Vehicle Access

·     Minimise width and number of vehicle access points

·     Access driveways set back at least 10m from street intersections

·     Vehicle and pedestrian access to buildings clearly distinguished and separated at l

·     Vehicle crossing width is acceptable for intensity of use proposed

·     Vehicles must exit in a forward direction

·     Vehicle entries are integrated into the external façade and are finished in a high quality material

·     Retaining walls associated with driveways maximum height of 1.2m

 

Single vehicle entrance from Milray Street

YES

2.3 Basement and visitor car parking

Logical and efficient basement design AS2890.1

 

 

YES

Appropriate ceiling floor to ceiling heights and ventilation provided

 

Appropriate heights provided to facilitate access and ventilation

YES

Basement is fully tanked

 

Basement is tanked

YES

Unimpeded access to visitor parking and waste recycling rooms

 

Unimpeded access provided

YES

Ventilation grilles and screening devices are integrated into the landscape design

 

 

YES

Vehicles access ways are not in close proximity to doors and windows of habitable rooms

 

Driveway not located within close proximity of windows

YES

Safe and accessible intercom access provided

Requirements of development consent

YES

Visitors’ parking is finished appropriately and is safe

 

 

YES

At least one visitor space is accessible and designed in accordance with AS2890.6

 

Visitor space is accessible

YES

2.5 Parking for people with a disability

Accessible spaces are signposted and have a continuous path of travel to the principal entrance or a lift

 

Requirements of development consent

YES

Each adaptable unit has at least one accessible car space

 

Town house 4 and 14 are nominated with accessible spaces

YES

2.6 Pedestrian Movement within Car Parks

Designed in accordance with AS1428.1

 

Access report provided

YES

Marked pedestrian pathways have clear sightlines, appropriate lighting, are visible, conveniently located and constructed of non-slip material

 

Requirements of development consent

YES

2.6 Bicycle Parking and facilities

 

Bicycle parking and storage facilities satisfy AS2890.3

Bicycle parking provided within basement

YES

Bicycle access paths have a minimum width of 1.5metres

 

Minimum width achieved

YES

Part 3 – Building Design and Sustainability

3.2 Social Impact

Social Impact Statement required/lodged

 

 

N/A

3.3 Building Services

Services and related structures are appropriately located to minimise streetscape impact

Condition 25

YES

Air-conditioning units are well screened and do not create adverse noise impacts

 

 

Condition 87

YES

3.4 Waste Management

Efficient, effective and sustainable waste management practices

 

Waste management plan submitted

YES

3.5 Acoustic Privacy

Design minimises impact of internal and external noise sources

Condition 87

YES

3.6 Visual Privacy

Visual privacy maintained for occupants and for neighbouring dwellings

 

Refer to discussion

YES

3.7 Materials, Finishes and Colours

External walls constructed of high quality and durable materials

 

Sandstone cladding and rendered masonry

YES

Use of materials and colours creates well-proportioned facades and minimises visual bulk

 

Sandstone cladding, rendered masonry and vertical seam pressed zinc cladding

YES

3.9 Construction, Demolition and Disposal

Satisfactory Environmental Site Management Plan

Environmental and site management plan submitted

YES

 

3.6 Visual Privacy

 

As a result of the required driveway grades and clearance height to the basement, the site’s cross fall and the at grade entrance from Kochia Lane, the proposal results in elevated north facing terraces. The balcony floor level for Block A (Townhouses 1-6) and B (Townhouses 7-12) is RL89.40. The balcony floor level for Block C (Townhouses 13-16) is RL88.53.

 

The proposed terraces associated with Townhouses 6 – 16 are within 1 metre of the natural ground level, while Townhouses 1-5 are greater than 1 metre above natural ground level. The maximum projection is 2.4 metres associated with Unit 1, which immediately adjoins Milray Street and where the basement entrance is located. 

 

The site to the north is zoned R4 high density residential and to the east by a property zoned R2 Low Density Residential. The proposal provides for a 4 metres setback to the northern boundary and 3.1 metres to the eastern boundary.

 

The elevated nature of the terraces occurs where there is a change in the natural topography of the site and is greatest within Block A in the north-western corner of the development. The proposal provides for a 4 metres setback and is adjoined to the north by a site capable of being developed for a residential flat building, whereby a 6 metres side setback would be required. Reasonable separation can therefore be achieved between properties.

 

Townhouse 16 in the north-eastern corner of the site and is set back 3.1 metres from the eastern boundary. The north facing elevated terrace is 830mm above natural ground and the proposal has been designed to provide for a blade wall 1.2 metres in depth and then the terrace is setback 5.0 metres from the eastern boundary. The adjoining property contains a single storey garage accessed from Kochia Lane and is set back approximately 2.5 metres from the shared boundary. The property contains a swimming pool adjacent to the northern boundary and extends in an eastern direction. The garage’s siting towards Kochia Lane aligns with the south-eastern corner of Townhouse 16. The garage has a ridge height of RL91.71. Townhouse 16 contains the following openings in the eastern elevation:

 

·     at ground floor (RL88.63) are associated with the kitchen, dining room and family room

·     at first floor (RL92.18) are associated with bedroom 2 and an ensuite

·     at second floor (RL95.23) are associated with a living room and contains a balcony

 

The windows at ground floor have a sill height of 1.2 metres (RL89.83). The garage aligns with the kitchen and dining room and the proposal does not result in a privacy impact due to the height of the garage and relative level of the windows.

 

Between the garage and swimming pool is a pedestrian walkway. The family room window aligns with this area between the garage and swimming pool and is not considered to result in any adverse privacy impacts.

 

The bedroom 2 window is a highlight window and will not result in any adverse impact upon privacy to the adjoining property. The ensuite window, given the use of the room is not considered likely to result in any loss of visual privacy.

 

The living room window at second floor has a sill height of 1.2 metres. Therefore a condition is recommended requiring the window to be a highlight window to minimise any privacy impacts. (Condition 19)

 

The proposed balcony has an eastern orientation. It is recommended that a screen 600mm in height be provided on top of the solid balustrade in order to maintain visual privacy to the adjoining property. (Condition 19)

 

Part 4 – Water management

 

Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed development has been designed to manage urban stormwater as per the requirements of the DCP, subject to conditions. 

 

Part 5 – Notification

 

The application has been notified in accordance with the requirements of the DCP. The submissions received are addressed above.

 

Section 94 Development Contributions Plan 2010

 

The development attracts a section 94 contribution of $411,871.82 which is required to be paid prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate (Condition No. 37). The second floor living rooms have been calculated as third bedrooms for the purpose of this calculation.

 

Likely Impacts

 

The likely impacts of the development have been considered within this report and are deemed to be acceptable, subject to conditions.

 

Suitability of the Site

 

The site is suitable for the proposed development.

 

Public Interest

 

The public interest is best served by the consistent application of the requirements of the relevant Environmental Planning Instruments, and by Council ensuring that any adverse effects on the surrounding area and the environment are minimised. The proposal has been assessed against the relevant environmental planning instruments and is deemed to be acceptable. On this basis, the proposal is not considered to raise any issues that would be contrary to the public interest.

 

Conclusion

 

Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council as the consent authority, grant development consent to Development Application DA0158/16 for demolition of existing structures and construction of a multi-dwelling development consisting of 16 townhouses, basement parking, landscaping works and amalgamation of three lots into one on land at 1 Milray Street and 12 and 14 Kochia Lane, Lindfield subject to Conditions. Pursuant to Section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within two years of the date of the Notice of Determination.

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

Cover Sheet DA00 [4]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/12/2016

Site Plan DA01[4]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/12/2016

Basement & Ground Floor Plans DA02[8]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/01/2017

Upper Floors & Roof Plan DA03[6]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/01/2017

Elevations & Finishes DA04[8]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/01/2017

Sections - Sheet 1 DA05[4]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/12/2016

Sections - Sheet 1 DA05[5]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/01/2017

Sections - Sheet 2 DA06[6]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/12/2016

Adaptable Layouts DA08[3]

Giles Tribe Architects

20/12/2016

Front Garden Fence Detail DA10[1]

Giles Tribe Architects

04/11/2016

Front Garden Fence - Milray Street DA11[1]

Giles Tribe Architects

04/11/2016

Front Garden Fence - Kochia Lane DA12[1]

Giles Tribe Architects

04/11/2016

Landscape plan 16-004/1 Issue I (2 plans)

Jocelyn Ramsay & Assoc. Pty Ltd

19.12.2016

Stormwater Management Plans drawings C1  Issue H

ACOR consultants

03.11.2016

Stormwater Management Plans drawings C2 - C9 inclusive Issue G

ACOR consultants

03.11.2016

Stormwater Management Plan C10 and C11 Issue F

ACOR consultants

03.11.2016

Stream Flow Control and Stormwater Quality Report drawings 1.01 to 1.07 Issue B

ACOR consultants

12.10.16

Excavation Cut & Fill Plan DA24.1

Hugh Gordon Architect

03/29/16

Erosion, Sediment Control & External Lighting Plan DA20.1

Hugh Gordon Architect

03/21/16

 

Document(s)

Dated

Arborist Report (Earthscape Horticultural Services)

July 2016

Basix certificate No. 715306M_07

30 October 2016

Access/Compliance report (PSE Access Consulting)

26 July 2016

Traffic & Parking Assessment Report (Winning Traffic Solutions)

Revised July 2016

Geotechnical Report (JK Geotechnics) Ref: 29157Zrpt

4 March 2016

Waste Management Plan (Urbanesque Planning Pty Ltd)

6 April 2016

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

 

3.     Approved landscape plans

 

Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

16-004/1 L01 & L02 Rev I

Jocelyn Ramsay & Assoc.

19/12/2016

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

5.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

7.     Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·           Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Milray Street and Kochia Lane over the site frontage.

·           All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:              A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

8.     Dilapidation survey and report (private property)

 

Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Address:

·        12 Nelson Road (garage only)

 

The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.

 

In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.

 

Note:              A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.

 

9.     Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (TMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The TMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for a 12.5 metre long heavy rigid vehicle and if required for demolition and excavation stages a 19.0 metre long articulated vehicle are to be shown.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·           Demolition

·           Excavation

·           Concrete pour

·           Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·           Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site

·           Pedestrian safety measures to be shown.

 

The use of Kochia Lane during all stages of construction activity is not supported. Given the narrow width of the laneway and disruption to residential driveways and school play area, it is required that the CTMP show a temporary driveway off Milray Street in the location of the new driveway access for the use of construction related vehicles. 

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users. 

 

NO construction vehicles movements are to occur during the school drop-off (8.00am to 9.30am) and pick-up hours (2.30pm to 4.00pm) on school days.

 

When a satisfactory TMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved TMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines will be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:       To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

10.   Work zone

 

A works zone shall be provided along the Milray street frontage. The applicant must make a written application to the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee to install the work zone and 'No Parking' restriction. Work zones are provided specifically for the set down and pick up of materials and not for the parking of private vehicles associated with the site. Work zones will generally not be approved where there is sufficient space on-site for the setting down and picking up of goods being taken to or from a construction site.

 

A ‘No Parking’ restrictions shall be introduced along the site frontage of Milray Street adjacent to the driveway crossing to ensure pedestrian safety and providing vehicle sightlines.

 

If the work zone is approved by the Local Traffic Committee, the applicant must obtain a written copy of the related resolution from the Ku-ring-gai Local Traffic Committee and submit this to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to commencement of any works on site.

 

Where approval of the work zone is resolved by the Committee, the necessary work zone signage shall be installed (at the cost of the applicant) and the adopted fee paid prior to commencement of any works on site. At the expiration of the work zone approval, the applicant is required to remove the work zone signs and reinstate any previous signs at their expense.

 

In the event the work zone is required for a period beyond that initially approved by the Traffic Committee, the applicant shall make a payment to Council for the extended period in accordance with Council’s schedule of fees and charges for work zones prior to the extended period commencing.

 

Reason:         To ensure that appropriate measures have been made for the operation of the site during the construction phase.

 

11.   Sediment controls

 

Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.

 

The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

12.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off as detailed within Appendix 6 (Tree Protection Plan) DWG No. T16-030702 within the arboricultural impact assessment report by Earthscape Horticultural services dated July 2016 to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Tree/Location

Radius in metres

T1, T2, T26, T29, T30, and T40 Milray St road reserve, site, and adjacent to northern site boundary in neighbouring site

As per Appendix 6 (Tree Protection Plan) DWG No. T16-030702 within the arboricultural impact assessment report by Earthscape Horticultural services, dated July 2016

T8 Washingtonia robusta (Washington Palm)

Site frontage

1.0m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

13.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

14.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone.

 

·        This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·        Any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report.

·        The arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

·        The Arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council.

·        The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

15.   Tree protection mulching

 

Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

16.   Tree protection - avoiding soil compaction

 

To preserve the following tree/s and avoid soil compaction, no work shall commence until temporary measures to avoid soil compaction (eg rumble boards) between the specified tree protection fencing and the basement footprint of the following tree/s is installed:

 

Tree/Location

T26 Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree) Northern site boundary

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

17.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

18.   Lot consolidation

 

Prior to the commencement of works, the applicant must consolidate Lot X within DP 406932, Lot 1 and Lot 2 within DP 1182693 which will form the development site. Evidence of lot consolidation, in the form of a plan registered with Land and Property Information, must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To facilitate the orderly development of land.

 

19.   Privacy

 

Amended plans and specifications are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate showing the following:

 

·           The living room window in the eastern elevation of Townhouse 16 at second floor shall be a highlight window with a sill height of 1.6 metres above the finished floor level

·           A 600mm high screen on top of the balustrade to the second storey balcony of Townhouse 16 shall be provided. The screening should be similar to that shown on Block A & B East Elevation on drawing DA04[6].

 

Reason:         To maintain visual privacy to neighbouring properties.

 

20.   Amendments to approved landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

16-004/1 L01 & L02 Rev I

Jocelyn Ramsay & Assoc

19/12/2016

 

 

The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended as follows:

 

·           The proposed avenue planting of Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash) adjacent to the Kochia Lane/south-east site frontage shall be amended to alternate plantings of Pyrus usseriensis (Manchurian Pear) and Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle) with a minimum pot size of 45 litres at planting.

·           Three 45 litres Pyrus calleryana ‘Capital’ shall be planted at equal spacing within the north-eastern setback mid-way between the building and site boundary.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.

 

Note:              An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:       To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

21.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

22.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

23.   Outdoor lighting

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Note:              Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse affects on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.

 

24.   Air drying facilities

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.

 

In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Amenity & energy efficiency.

 

25.   External service pipes and the like prohibited

 

Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building.  Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans.  Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.

 

Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation.  The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.

 

26.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the  plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:         To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

27.   Adaptable units

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application, Townhouses 4 and 14, are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.

 

Note:              Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Disabled access & amenity.

 

28.   Location of plant (multi dwelling buildings)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.

 

C1.   Note:    Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.

 

29.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

30.   Driveway grades - basement carparks

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:

 

·           vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and

·           all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles. 

 

If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

31.   Basement car parking details

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:

 

·           all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking”

·           a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (Volume C Part 23.7 of the Local Centres DCP for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement

·           no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area

·           the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

32.   Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that  engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in Kochia Lane:

 

·           A new concrete footpath along the Kochia Lane site frontage in accordance with Council's standard drawing 2003-004 Rev.'B'.

 

Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve.  The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.

 

The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works.  Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 - 1996 - Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads - Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.

 

A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.

 

33.   Energy Australia requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.

 

 

 

34.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

35.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:         To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

36.   Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee

 

To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

(a)      All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

(b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

(c)      The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

(d)      In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.

 

(e)      In this condition:

 

“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:         To maintain public infrastructure.

 

37.   Section 94 Contributions - Centres.

        (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010)

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Key Community Infrastructure

Amount

Local recreation and cultural facilities;  Local social facilities

$31,151.93

Local roads, local bus facilities & local drainage facilities (new roads and road modifications)

$39,195.63

Local parks and local sporting facilities

$219,216.21

Local roads, local bus facilities & local drainage facilities (townscape, transport & pedestrian facilities)

$122,308.05

Total:

$411,871.82

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:       To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

38.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

39.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·        The work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·        In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

40.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:              Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

41.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

42.   Engineering fees

 

For the purpose of any development related inspections by Ku-ring-gai Council engineers, the corresponding fees set out in Councils adopted Schedule of Fees and Charges are payable to Council. A re-inspection fee per visit may be charged where work is unprepared at the requested time of inspection, or where remedial work is unsatisfactory and a further inspection is required. Engineering fees must be paid in full prior to any final consent from Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

43.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

44.   Construction noise

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.

 

45.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·           be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·           display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·           be durable and weatherproof

·           display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·           be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

46.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·           physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·           earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·           all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·           the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·           all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·           all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·           gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·           cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

47.   Post-construction dilapidation report

 

The applicant shall engage a suitably qualified person to prepare a post construction dilapidation report at the completion of the construction works. This report is to ascertain whether the construction works created any structural damage to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads. The report is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority. In ascertaining whether adverse structural damage has occurred to adjoining buildings, infrastructure and roads, the Principal Certifying Authority must:

 

·           compare the post-construction dilapidation report with the pre-construction dilapidation report

·           have written confirmation from the relevant authority that there is no adverse structural damage to their infrastructure and roads.

 

A copy of this report is to be forwarded to Council at the completion of the construction works.

 

Reason:         Management of records.

 

48.   Compliance with submitted geotechnical report

 

A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.

 

Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:

 

·           appropriate excavation method and vibration control

·           support and retention of excavated faces

·           hydro-geological considerations

 

must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Assessment prepared by JK Geotechnics Ref. 29157Zrpt, dated 4 March 2016. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

49.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

50.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

51.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

 

52.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

53.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

54.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·           are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·           are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·           are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·           refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·           are restricted to one such sign per property

·           do not exceed 2.5m2

·           are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

55.   Maintenance period for works in public road

 

A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

56.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

57.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

58.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

59.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

60.   Arborist’s report

 

The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:

 

Tree/Location

Time of inspection

T1, T2, T8, T26, T29, T30, and T40 Milray St road reserve, site, and adjacent to northern site boundary in neighbouring site

*1 Week prior to the commencement of any works on site. *Certification of tree protection requirements as per the consent conditions *At three monthly intervals during construction *At the completion of all works on site

T26 Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree) Northern site boundary

*Direct supervision of excavation and root pruning within a 6.0m radius

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

61.   Trees on nature strip

 

Removal/pruning of the following tree/s from Council's nature strip to permit vehicular access shall be undertaken at no cost to Council by an experienced tree removal contractor/arborist holding public liability insurance amounting to a minimum cover of $20,000,000:

 

Tree/Location

T3, T4 and T5 Milray St road reserve

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

62.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist under the direct supervision of an AQF5 arborist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

63.   Cutting of tree roots

 

No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:

 

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 Cedrus deodar (Himalayan Cedar) Milray St road reserve

8.0m

T2 Leptospermum petersonii (Lemon scented tea tree) Milray St road reserve

2.5m

T8 Washingtonia robusta (Washington Palm) Site frontage

1.0m

T26 Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree) Northern site boundary

3.5m south-east, 6.0m elsewhere

T29 Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle) Northern site boundary

3.5m

T30 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) Northern site boundary

3.0m

T40 Schinus areira (Peppercorn Tree) Northern site boundary in neighbouring site

6.0m south-east, 8.5m elsewhere

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

64.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:

 

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

T3, T4, T5, T9, T10, T11, T12, T13 T14, T15, T16, T17, T18, T19, T20, T21, T22, T23, T24,T27, T32, T23, T24, T27, T28, T31, T32, T44, T45, T46, T48, T49, and T50

Removal

 

All trees shall be clearly tagged and identified consistent with the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural services dated July 2016.

 

Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

65.   Excavation near trees

 

No mechanical excavation shall be undertaken within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s until root pruning by hand under the direct supervision of the Project Arborist along the perimeter line of such works is completed:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T26 Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree)

Northern site boundary

6.0m

T40 Schinus areira (Peppercorn Tree)

Northern site boundary in neighbouring site

6.0m south-east, 8.5m elsewhere

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

66.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 Cedrus deodar (Himalayan Cedar)

Milray St road reserve

8.0m

T2 Leptospermum petersonii (Lemon scented tea tree) Milray St road reserve

2.5m

T8 Washingtonia robusta (Washington Palm)

Site frontage

1.0m

T26 Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree)

Northern site boundary

3.5m south-east, 6.0m elsewhere

T29 Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle)

Northern site boundary

3.5m

T30 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

Northern site boundary

3.0m

T40 Schinus areira (Peppercorn Tree)

Northern site boundary in neighbouring site

6.0m south-east, 8.5m elsewhere

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

67.   Thrust boring/directional drilling

 

Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise directional drilling or thrust boring method.  Directional drilling/Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T26 Ginkgo biloba (Maidenhair Tree)

Northern site boundary

3.5m south-east, 6.0m elsewhere

T29 Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle)

Northern site boundary

3.5m

T30 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

Northern site boundary

3.0m

T40 Schinus areira (Peppercorn Tree)

Northern site boundary in neighbouring site

6.0m south-east, 8.5m elsewhere

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

68.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

69.   Tree removal on nature strip

 

Following removal of T3, T4 and T5 from Council's nature strip, the nature strip shall be rehabilitated to the satisfaction of Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape.

 

70.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

71.   Replenishment trees to be planted

 

The replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:         To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

72.   Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:

 

·           ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry,

·           certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and

·           certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.

·           This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab.

·           No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.  This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

Reason:       To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.

 

73.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·           Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·           This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

74.   Easement for waste collection

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, an easement for waste collection is to be created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919. This is to permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject property for the purpose of collecting waste from the property.  The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council’s draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.

 

Reason:         To permit legal access for Council, Council’s contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.

 

75.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 715306M_07 and dated 30 October 2016 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

76.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

77.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24R.8). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

78.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·           the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·           the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of BASIX and Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24C.5 respectively, have been achieved

·           retained water is connected and available for use

·           basement and subsoil areas are able to drain via a pump/sump system installed in accordance with AS3500.3 and Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24R.6

·           all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·           components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·           all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

Note:              Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

79.   WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·           as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·           gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·           as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·           as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·           the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·           as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·           the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·           dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·           the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·           top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

80.   Basement pump-out maintenance

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a maintenance regime has been prepared for the basement stormwater pump-out system.

 

Note:              A maintenance regime specifying that the system is to be regularly inspected and checked by qualified practitioners is to be prepared by a suitable qualified professional and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

81.   OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Council’s Local Centres DCP Volume C Part 24R.8). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

82.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

83.   Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark – RFB

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·          the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans

 

·          the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 – 2004 “Off-Street car parking" and the Seniors Living State Environment Planning Policy in terms of minimum parking space dimensions

 

·          finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars

 

·          no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area

 

·          the vehicular headroom requirements of:

-      Australian Standard 2890.1 – “Off-street car parking”,

-      The Seniors Living SEPP (as last amended) for accessible parking spaces,

-      2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks (refer DCP 40) are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.

 

Note:              Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.

 

84.   Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure         works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:

 

·           new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council

·           removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials)

·           full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction

·           full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing

 

This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape.

 

85.   Construction of works in public road - approved plans

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.

 

The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council.

 

The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings.  The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval.  All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued. 

 

Reason:         To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.

 

86.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

87.   Noise control – plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

88.   Car parking

 

At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building.  These requirements are to be enforced through the following:

 

·           restrictive covenant placed on title pursuant to Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act, 1919

·           restriction on use under Section 68 of the Strata Schemes (Leasehold Development) Act, 1986 to all lots comprising in part or whole car parking spaces

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kimberley Kavwenje

Executive Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Selwyn Segall

Team Leader - Development Assessment South

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Location Map

 

2016/325757

 

A2

Zoning Extract

 

2016/325759

 

A3

Survey

 

2016/095536

 

A4

Site Plan

 

2017/017499

 

A5

Basement Garage and Ground Floor Plan

 

2017/016526

 

A6

Upper Floor and Roof Plan

 

2017/016527

 

A7

Elevations

 

2017/016528

 

A8

Sections Sheet 1

 

2017/016529

 

A9

Sections Sheet 2

 

2017/017543

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Location Map

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 2 - Zoning Extract

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 3 - Survey

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 4 - Site Plan

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 5 - Basement Garage and Ground Floor Plan

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 6 - Upper Floor and Roof Plan

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 7 - Elevations

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 8 - Sections Sheet 1

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 9 - Sections Sheet 2

 

Item No: GB.7

 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.8 / 177

 

 

Item GB.8

S11257

 

23 November 2016

 

 

Planning Proposal - Rezoning 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

For Council to consider a Planning Proposal for 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara.

 

 

background:

The Planning Proposal was submitted to Council on 29 August 2016. The Planning Proposal was incomplete. Following the submission of additional documentation, the review of the Planning Proposal formally commenced on 4 November 2016.

The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan as follows:

·     Rezone the site from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential

·     Amend the Floor Space Ratio applying to the subject site from 0.3 : 1 to 1.3 :1

·     Amend the Height of Building applying to the site from 9.5m to 17.5m

·     Amend the Lot Size applying to the site from 840sqm to 1200sqm

 

 

comments:

The purpose of this report is to determine whether the Planning Proposal should be submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination and proceed to public exhibition.

 

 

recommendation:

That the Planning Proposal be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

For Council to consider a Planning Proposal for 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara.

 

Background

 

A Pre-Planning Proposal meeting was held with the proponents and Council staff on 3 May 2016.

 

The Planning Proposal was submitted to Council on 29 August 2016, which seeks to make the following amendments to the KLEP 2015:

·     rezone the site from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential;

·     amend the Floor Space Ratio applying to the subject site from 0.3 : 1 to 1.3 :1;

·     amend the Height of Building applying to the site from 9.5m to 17.5m; and

·     amend the Lot Size applying to the site from 840sqm to 1200sqm.

The Planning Proposal as submitted was incomplete. Following the submission of additional documentation, the review of the Planning Proposal formally commenced on 4 November 2016. The submitted Planning Proposal and Appendices are included at Attachments A1 – A4.

 

Site Description and Local Context 

 

The site that is the subject of this Planning Proposal is 21 Lorne Avenue Killara (Lot 1 DP409107). The site has an area of 1005sqm and is located on the northern side of Lorne Avenue, Killara. Currently existing on the site is a two storey residential dwelling house. A Complying Development Certificate under Part 4A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 was issued on 1 December 2016 for the demolition of the dwelling.

 

Image 1 – Aerial Photo – 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara

 

The site is currently zoned R2 Low Density Residential under the KLEP 2015. The sites adjoining 21 Lorne Avenue to the north, west and east are currently zoned R4 High Density Residential. Opposite the site there are a group of properties (6-16 Lorne Avenue) zoned R2 Low Density Residential.

Image 2- Zoning Map Extract KLEP 2015

 

The site is located within the vicinity of heritage items I306 (20 Lorne Avenue, Reservoir pump station), I305 (14 Lorne Avenue, Dwelling House), I304 (10 Lorne Avenue, Dwelling House), I303 (8 Lorne Avenue, ‘Windermere’ Dwelling House), I302 (6 Lorne Avenue, Dwelling House). The site is also located opposite Heritage Conservation Area C24 Marian Street.

 

Image 3 – Heritage Map Extract – KLEP 2015

 

History of zoning

 

The surrounding sites to the North, East and West were all up- zoned in 2004 under LEP 194 which allowed for high density residential development of up to 5 storeys to occur on land zoned 2(d3).

 

The subject site was not included within the up-zoning under LEP 194 due to the site being identified as a heritage item under the KPSO. In investigating the implications of the 2(d3) zone, Council engaged consultants Perumal Murphy Alessi (PMA) to review the heritage status of a number of heritage interface sites impacted by adjoining 2(d3) zones. The PMA review found that in the context of the 2(d3) zoning and potential development surrounding 21 Lorne Avenue, the heritage listing should be removed. The heritage listing on the subject site was subsequently removed during the preparation of the KLEP 2015. See Attachment A5  PMA Heritage Consultants Review 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara.

 

When KLEP 2015 was made, the subject sites Residential 2(b) zoning under the KPSO was translated to R2 Low Density Residential under the KLEP 2015. The property was removed from Schedule 5 (Heritage Listing) of the KLEP 2015 as a result of Council’s resolution from OMC 26 November 2013. 

 

Comments

 

A Planning Proposal must demonstrate the strategic merit of the proposed amendments to a Local Environmental Plan. The Planning Proposal has been assessed against the provisions of the Department of Planning and Environment’s A Guide to Preparing Planning Proposals and Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The following is an assessment of the relevant merits of the amendments proposed to the KLEP 2015:

 

Zoning

 

The KLEP 2015 was a translation of the KPSO into the standard instrument format. Accordingly, the subject sites Residential 2(b) zoning under the KPSO was translated to R2 Low Density Residential under the KLEP 2015.

 

The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the zoning of the subject site from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential. The subject site is currently an isolated R2 Low Density zoned site, with the surrounding sites to the north, east and west all zoned R4 High Density Residential. 

 

The development of residential flat buildings on the surrounding R4 High Density sites will result in the subject site being significantly compromised in terms of overshadowing and overlooking, should it be left an isolated R2 Low Density Residential site. 

 

The proposed rezoning to R4 High Density Residential will remove an isolated site and is a logical extension of the existing R4 zoning.

 

The proposed rezoning to R4 High Density Residential will create a consistent zoning and development controls for the northern side of Lorne Avenue.

 

Should the site be rezoned to R4 High Density Residential, consolidation with an adjoining site would be required in order to develop multi dwelling housing or a residential flat building, noting that Clause 6.6 of the KLEP 2015 requires a minimum lot size of 1200sqm for these development types. It is stated within the Planning Proposal that the intention is to develop the subject site in conjunction 9 Lorne Avenue.

 

Floor Space Ratio, Height and Lot Size

 

The Planning Proposal seeks to amend the Development Standards (Height, FSR and Lot Size) applying to the site so that they are consistent with the proposed R4 High Density Residential zone and the development standards applying to the surrounding sites. The Planning Proposal seeks the following amendments to the Development Standards:

·     amend the Floor Space Ratio applying to the subject site from 0.3 : 1 to 1.3 :1;

·     amend the Height of Building applying to the site from 9.5m to 17.5m; and

·     amend the Lot Size applying to the site from 840sqm to 1200sqm

The Development Standards proposed for the subject site within the Planning Proposal are commensurate with the Development Standards applying the surrounding R4 High Density zoned sites to the north, east and west of the site. The proposed Development Standards will allow for the orderly development of the site and surrounding properties. 

Heritage

 

The subject site is located within the vicinity of the following heritage items:

 

·     20 Lorne Avenue, Killara – Reservoir Pump Station – I306;

·     14 Lorne Avenue, Killara – Dwelling House – I305;

·     10 Lorne Avenue, Killara – Dwelling House – I304;

·     8 Lorne Avenue, Killara – ‘Windermere’ Dwelling House – I303; and

·     6 Lorne Avenue, Killara – Dwelling House – I302.

 

The site is also located opposite Heritage Conservation Area C24 Marian Street.

 

The proposed R4 zoning on the subject site will not result in adverse impacts to the heritage items or HCA located within the surrounding vicinity.

 

Any future development on the site would be required to comply with the controls within Part 19F of the DCP - Development in the Vicinity of Heritage Items or Heritage Conservation Areas (HCAs).

 

Traffic and Transport

 

The subject site is located within 300m (or 4 minutes’ walk) of Killara Train Station but access to other transport modes (buses) and basic shops and services is relatively low.

 

From the information submitted with the Planning Proposal, there is the potential yield of 20 dwellings resulting from the upzoning of 21 Lorne Avenue to R4, the amalgamation with 9 Lorne Avenue and potential development for residential flat buildings on the sites (9 and 21 Lorne Avenue).

 

Assuming a conservation traffic generation rate of 0.3 trips per dwelling (2 way) during peak hour, the potential peak hour traffic generation for the potential development on 9 and 21 Lorne Avenue would be 6 trips, or 1 additional trip every 10 minutes. This is not a high traffic generation rate.

 

In Council’s experience, this is not an area with significant traffic congestion issues compared to other areas in Ku-ring-gai, such as the Pacific Highway through Gordon or Turramurra. The traffic generation of 6 trips is unlikely to have significant additional impact on the surrounding road network. Surveys conducted at Killara railway station show a high level of access to the station by walking, which may indicate that the assumed traffic generation may be lower.

 

Council monitoring of traffic volumes in Lorne Avenue show that average weekday traffic flows have increased from approximately 1,850 vehicles per day (in 2010), to approximately 2,350 vehicles per day (in 2015). The recorded 85% speed in Lorne Avenue was 54Km/h (average, 2-way), which indicates the majority of vehicles travelling in Lorne Avenue travel at around (or below) the sign posted speed limit of 50km/h. The changes in traffic flow may be related to additional high density residential dwellings constructed between 2010 and 2015, as well as modifications to the commuter parking area in Culworth Avenue by Transport for NSW.

 

Lorne Avenue is a local road, and the RMS Guide to Traffic Generating Developments suggests that the desirable environmental capacity for local roads is 200 vehicles per hour, and the maximum environmental capacity is 300 vehicles per hour. Based on the recorded weekday traffic volumes in 2015, the peak hour volume would be approximately 235 vehicles per hour which is below the maximum environmental capacity of a local road. The addition of 6 trips in the peak hour from the potential redevelopment of 9 and 21 Lorne Avenue, would still result in a peak traffic flow of less than 300 vehicles per hour in Lorne Avenue.

 

Urban Design and Local Context

 

An Urban Design Study and Analysis was submitted with the Planning Proposal. The Urban Design Study notes that the subject site is currently occupied by a 2 storey brick residence, and the surrounding sites are predominately 5 storey residential flat buildings – or could be developed as such. It notes that unless the site is rezoned and amalgamated, the site will be an isolated site and will be left as the only 2 storey residential building along the street frontage.

 

Currently along the northern side of Lorne Avenue:

 

·     33a and 31 Lorne Avenue are older 2 storey walk-up flats

 

 

·     Sites at 25a-29 Lorne Avenue have been amalgamated and redeveloped into a 5 storey residential flat building

 

 

 

·     9, 21, 23, 25 Lorne Avenue are 2 storey dwellings houses – these sites have yet to be amalgamated and developed.

 

 

 


 

·     Sites at 3-7 Lorne Avenue have been amalgamated and redeveloped into a 5 storey residential flat building.

 

 

The proposed rezoning to R4 high density will remove the isolated R2 low density zoned site. The rezoning will allow for the orderly development of residential flat buildings along the northern side of Lorne Avenue.

 

Matters associated with the design of a potential building, are to be appropriately addressed via the development assessment process and the public exhibition of any subsequent development application.

 

Requirements under Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

 

The following is an assessment of the adequacy of the Planning Proposal under Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979:

 

(a)  Statement of objectives or intended outcomes of the proposed instrument

 

The objective of the Planning Proposal is to amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 to enable the development of high density residential on the subject site.

 

(b)  Explanation of the provisions that are to be included in the proposed instrument

 

To achieve the intended outcome of the Planning Proposal, amendments are required to the KLEP 2015 zoning, floor space ratio, height of buildings and lot size maps.

 

The Planning Proposal currently states the amendments sought are “in accordance with the illustrations under Part 4”. Part 2 of the Planning Proposal should be amended to detail the exact amendments sought (e.g. rezone the site from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential).

 

(c)  Justification

 

The Planning Proposal is not the result of any strategic study or report.

 

The Planning Proposal meets the objectives and directions of A Plan for Growing Sydney by facilitating urban renewal and new housing opportunities for a site within close proximity to Killara Train Station and Pacific Highway – close to existing infrastructure. The Planning Proposal is consistent with the following directions and actions:

 

-     Direction 2.1: Accelerate housing supply across Sydney

-     Action 2.1.1: Accelerate housing supply and local housing choices

-     Direction 2.2: Accelerate urban renewal across Sydney – providing homes closer to jobs

-     Action 2.2.2: Undertake urban renewal in transport corridors which are being transformed by investment, and around strategic centres

-     Direction 2.3: Improve housing choice to suit different needs and lifestyles

-     Direction 3.1: Revitalise existing suburbs

 

The Planning Proposal is consistent with the objectives and actions within the recently exhibited Draft North District Plan, specifically:

 

-     Action L4: Encourage housing diversity

-     Liveability Priority 2: Deliver housing diversity

 

The Planning Proposal is consistent with the following s117 Directions:

 

-     2.3 Heritage Conservation

-     3.1 Residential Zones

-     3.4 Integrating Land Use and Transport

-     6.1 Approval and referral requirements

-     7.1 Implementation of the Metropolitan Strategy

 

The Planning Proposal is consistent with the following objectives of the Ku-ring-gai Community Strategic Plan 2030:

 

-     C6.1 Housing diversity, adaptability and affordability is increased to support the needs of a changing community

-     P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai

 

The Planning Proposal is consistent with the following Aims of the KLEP 2015:

 

-     Clause 1.2(i) to encourage a variety of housing types within Ku-ring-gai

-     Clause 1.2(j) to achieve land use relationships that promote the efficient use of infrastructure

 

The submitted Planning Proposal has not identified any State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs) and being relevant.

 

It is unlikely that the Planning Proposal will result in any adverse environmental, social and economic impacts. The subject site is not mapped as Biodiversity Significant or Riparian under the KLEP 2015. The Planning Proposal will has positive social and economic effects such as the increased housing choice for people seeking to down-size within the area, and economically the proposal (should it result in high density development) will extract development contributions that will assist in the local area infrastructure provision, and will introduce new population that can contribute to the local economy.

 

There is adequate existing public infrastructure and services available to support the proposed increase in residential density. The site has ready access to public transport, local schools and parks.

 

It is recommended that the following amendments be made to Part 3 – Justification of the Planning Proposal:

 

-     Amend Planning Proposal to identify specific objectives and actions within A Plan for Growing Sydney

-     Amend Planning Proposal should be amended to demonstrate consistency with Draft North District Plan.

-     Amend Planning Proposal to include reference to Urban Design Study as part of justification, and include the Urban Design Study in appendix

 

(d)  Maps

 

The mapping included in the Planning Proposal identifies the relevant aspects of the proposal including:

 

·     The currently zone applying to the site and surrounding area

·     The current development standard applying to the site and surrounding area

·     The proposed zoning to apply to the site

·     The proposed development standards to apply to the site

 

The mapping should be amended to clearly identify the land to which the planning proposal applies – this could be done through a bold outline around the subject site.

 

(e)  Community Consultation

The Gateway Determination will specify the community consultation that must be undertaken on the Planning Proposal, with an exhibition period of either 14 or 28 days.

 

The public exhibition of the planning proposal is generally undertaken in the following manner:

 

·     Notification in local newspaper

·     Notification on Councils website

·     Notification in writing to affected and adjoining landowners

 

During the exhibition period, the Planning Proposal and appendices would be made available for inspection. 

 

 

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identify and character of Ku-ring-gai

 

Strategies, plans and process are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development

 

Continue to review existing strategies and plans

 

 

Governance Matters

 

The process for the preparation and implementation of Planning Proposal is governed by the provisions contained within the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

If Council fails to make a decision within 90 days (from the commencement of the review of the application) or if Council makes a decision to not support the Planning Proposal, the proponent can request the Department of Planning and Environment for a Rezoning Review.

 

Risk Management

 

This is a privately initiated Planning Proposal. Council needs to determine its position on the matter as to whether the Planning Proposal should be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination and proceed to public exhibition.

 

Council risks damage to its reputation is if does not undertake strategic land use planning in an effective and timely manner.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The Planning Proposal was subject to the relevant application fee under Council’s 2015/2016 Fees and Charges schedule. The cost of the review and assessment of the Planning Proposal is covered by this fee.

 

Social Considerations

 

The site is well integrated with the surrounding public transport and pedestrian routes. The site is located within close proximity to the North Shore Railway Line and Killara Station. In addition, there are retail, educational and recreational facilities close by. The increase in residential density will have access to facilities shared by the local community. 

 

Environmental Considerations

 

The site is not identified as having Biodiversity or Riparian mapping under the KLEP 2015.

 

Community Consultation

 

In the event that the Planning Proposal is granted a Gateway Determination by the Department of Planning and Environment, the Planning Proposal would be placed on a statutory public exhibition in accordance with the requirements of the Gateway and the Department of Planning and Environments publication A Guide to Preparing Planning Proposals.

 

The public exhibition would include notification to the surrounding properties and advertisement within the North Shore Times and on Council’s website.

 

Internal Consultation

 

This report has been referred to the relevant sections of Council for comment.

 

Summary

 

A Planning Proposal has been lodged for 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara which seeks to make the following amendments to the KLEP 2015:

·     rezone the site from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential;

·     amend the Floor Space Ratio applying to the subject site from 0.3 : 1 to 1.3 :1;

·     amend the Height of Building applying to the site from 9.5m to 17.5m; and

·     amend the Lot Size applying to the site from 840sqm to 1200sqm

The Planning Proposal has been assessed against the Department of Planning and Environment’s A Guide to Preparing Planning Proposals and Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and there is sufficient strategic merit in the Planning Proposal to enable it to proceed to Gateway Determination.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That the Planning Proposal to rezone 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara be sent to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination.

 

B.   That prior to being sent for a Gateway Determination, the Planning Proposal be amended by the applicant as outlined in the body of this report.

 

C.   That Council requests the plan-making delegation under Section 23 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for this Planning Proposal.

 

D.   That upon receipt of a Gateway Determination, the exhibition and consultation process be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the requirement of the Gateway Determination.

 

E.   That a report be brought back to Council at the conclusion of the exhibition period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alexandra Plumb

Urban Planner

 

 

 

 

Craige Wyse

Team Leader Urban Planning

 

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Amended Planning Proposal - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara - Submitted 11 October 2016

 

2016/284596

 

A2

Heritage Impact Statement - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara

 

2016/305168

 

A3

Development Yield Analysis - 21 and 9 Lorne Avenue Killara - Planning Proposal rezoning 21 Lorne Avenue to R4

 

2016/284594

 

A4

Urban Design Study and Analysis - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara - 2 Nov 2016

 

2016/304798

 

A5

PMA Heritage Consultants Review - 21 Lorne Avenue - Killara

 

2013/233256

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Amended Planning Proposal - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara - Submitted 11 October 2016

 

Item No: GB.8

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 2 - Heritage Impact Statement - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara

 

Item No: GB.8

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 3 - Development Yield Analysis - 21 and 9 Lorne Avenue Killara - Planning Proposal rezoning 21 Lorne Avenue to R4

 

Item No: GB.8

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 4 - Urban Design Study and Analysis - 21 Lorne Avenue Killara - 2 Nov 2016

 

Item No: GB.8

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 5 - PMA Heritage Consultants Review - 21 Lorne Avenue - Killara

 

Item No: GB.8

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.9 / 266

 

 

Item GB.9

S09969

 

12 December 2016

 

 

Turramurra Community Hub Masterplan and Rezoning & Reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

For Council to consider the feedback following the public hearing for the Planning Proposal to rezone and reclassify Council owned land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra and for Council to adopt the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan.

 

 

background:

The Planning Proposal was placed on Public Exhibition from 29 April 2016 – 27 May 2016. A Public Hearing into the reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra (Turramurra Village Park) was held on 26 October 2016.

The Master Plan for the Turramurra Community Hub was placed on exhibition 30 April 2016 – 29 May 2016. To date Council has not adopted a final master plan.

 

 

comments:

This report addresses the resolution from OMC 6 December, 2016 to report back to Council the Chairperson’s findings on the public hearing and a make a recommendation for a final master plan. 

 

 

recommendation:

This report recommends that the land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra be rezoned and reclassified and that the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan, as described in this report, be adopted.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

For Council to consider the feedback following the public hearing for the Planning Proposal to rezone and reclassify Council owned land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra and for Council to adopt the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan.

 

 

Background

 

1.   Planning Proposal to rezone and reclassify Council owned land at 5 Ray Street,
12 William Street and 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra

 

On 12 November 2013 after considering a report on its future landholdings within the Ray Street Precinct and in light of a supermarket development application by Coles, Council resolved to prepare a Planning Proposal to reclassify 5 Ray Street and 12 William Street, Turramurra from ‘Community’ to ‘Operational’ land, and to rezone part of 5 Ray Street from the RE1 Public Recreation zone to B2 Local Centre zone. Council also resolved to prepare a masterplan for the precinct.

 

The proposed reclassification of Council owned sites within the precinct is considered necessary to facilitate a comprehensive redevelopment plan for the precinct, as Council is a significant landowner within the precinct. In order to achieve the Turramurra Community Hub, Council needs to include its land in the redevelopment project. The reclassification will allow Council more flexibility to plan and deliver the proposed community facilities within the precinct.

 

On 9 December 2014 Council resolved to adopt the preferred design option for the ‘Turramurra Community Hub’ for public exhibition and that a draft masterplan be prepared. The adopted preferred design option relocated the Turramurra Village Park (1275 Pacific Highway) and utilised the existing park site for a community building.

 

On 8 December 2015 Council resolved to amend the existing Planning Proposal for 5 Ray Street and 12 William Street to also incorporate 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra (Village Park). Council resolved to reclassify the park site from ‘Community’ to ‘Operational’ and rezone part of the site from RE1 Public Recreation to B2 Local Centre.

 

On 28 June 2016 Council considered a report that documented the results of the public exhibition of the Community Hub Master Plan. Following high levels of community support the report recommended that council adopt the master plan however Council resolved that all action cease on the reclassification and rezoning of the Turramurra Village Park until after a decision had been made to determine the location of the library and Community Centre facilities within the Ray Street precinct.

 

On 6 September 2016, Council resolved to adopt the Planning Proposal to reclassify 5 Ray Street and 12 William Street and submit the Plan to the Department of Planning and Environment. Council also resolved to take no further action on the reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway (Turramurra Village).

 

On 20 September 2016 Council moved to rescind the abovementioned motion from the 6 September 2016. Resolving to adopt the Turramurra Town Square site as the preferred site for the location of the proposed Community Building and recommence the rezoning and reclassification of Council owned land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra.

 

On 8 December 2016 Council resolved to amend the draft Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan (as exhibited) to take into account amendments to the lower ground floor plan made in consultation with Coles. Council also asked that a report be brought back to Council in early 2017 documenting the Chairperson’s findings on the public hearing and recommending a final master plan.

 

2.   Gateway Determination relating to 5 Ray Street, 12 William Street and
1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra

 

The Planning Proposal to reclassify 5 Ray Street, 12 William Street, and 1275 Pacific Highway Turramurra was submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination on 19 February 2016. The Department of Planning and Environment issued a Gateway Determination on 5 April 2016. Refer Attachment A1. The Gateway Determination included conditions which required Council to amend the Planning Proposal prior to public exhibition in order to clarify aspects of the proposal applying to 12 William Street and 1275 Pacific Highway, as well as mapping amendments.

 

3.   Exhibition of Planning Proposal and Submissions relating to 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra

 

The Planning Proposal (amended as per the conditions of the Gateway Determination) was publically exhibited between 29 April 2016 and 27 May 2016. The exhibition of the Planning Proposal ran concurrently with the public exhibition of the Turramurra Community Hub Masterplan. The Planning Proposal is included at Attachment A2. Due to the size of the Planning Proposal Appendices (A-I) they are not included as an attachment and will instead be circulated separately.

 

a.   Public submissions

 

A total of seven (7) submissions were received in response to the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal. A summary of the submissions received and Council comment on the matters raised in the submissions are included at Attachment A3. The matters raised in these submissions were addressed in the Council report on 6 September 2016 on the exhibition of the Planning Proposal and the Public Hearing into the reclassification of 5 Ray Street and 12 William Street, Turramurra.

 

Only one submission specifically commented on the rezoning and reclassification of land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra. The comments are as follows:

 

I.    Opposes amendment to KLEP (Local Centres) 2012 to rezone and reclassify Council land at Turramurra Village Park (1275 Pacific Highway) as it will destroy heritage view lines to ‘Hillview’ one of Turramurra’s most significant heritage items in addition to the loss of the publically owned Ray Street carpark and Turramurra Library.

II.   Requests adaptive reuse of Turramurra’s historic buildings and protection of heritage landscape for future.

III.  Requests Council to revise masterplan and planning proposal to sensitively plan for all four of Turramurra’s village precincts and keep Turramurra to a human scale.

In relation to comment ‘i’ above it is acknowledged that 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra is within the vicinity of the heritage listed “Hillview” on the southern side of the Pacific Highway. The subject site of this Planning Proposal is not heritage listed or included within a HCA.

The rezoning and reclassification of the site will not have any direct impact on the heritage significance of Hillview. Any potential heritage impacts associated with the future development on 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra would be considered in the design of any building proposed for the site and be assessed as part of any development application of the site.

The reclassification and rezoning of the Council owned land within the Ray Street Precinct seeks to provide an opportunity for a future integrated development redevelopment of the precinct – which will include the replacement and enhancement of the existing public car parking and community facilities, as well as new areas of public open space.

 

In relation comment ‘ii’ above the DCP controls for the Hill View precinct require the existing heritage listed buildings to be adaptively re-used. The subject sites of this Planning Proposal are not heritage listed or included within a HCA.

Finally in relation to comment ‘iii’ above the Local Centres DCP contains building controls for the four precincts in Turramurra (Ray Street, Kissing Point Road, Hill View and Rohini Street). Council is focusing on the masterplan for the Ray Street precinct at this time. In due course the remaining Turramurra Local Centre precincts will also be further master planned, supported by the objectives in the KLEP (Local Centres) 2012 and Local Centres DCP.

b.   State Agency comments

 

The Gateway Determination required Council to consult with the following public authorities under section 56(2)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and/or comply with the requirements of relevant S117 Directions:

 

· Transport for NSW;

· Transport for NSW – (RMS) Roads and Maritime Services;

· Transport for NSW – Sydney Trains;

· Energy Australia; and

· Sydney Water.

 

The Planning Proposal was sent to the above agencies for comment under section 56(2)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Transport for NSW (TfNSW), Roads and Maritime Services (RMS), Sydney Trains and Sydney Water provided submissions in response to the request for comment under s56(2)(d). Additional submissions from NSW Health (Northern Sydney Local Health District) and Ausgrid were also received. There were no objections to the Planning Proposal. A summary of the State Agency submissions received and Council comment is included at Attachment A4.

 

The submissions from Transport for NSW and RMS requested that a traffic and transport assessment be undertaken to identify impacts and mitigation measures to be completed prior to the rezoning being gazetted. Council has undertaken a microsimulation transport assessment of the road network in Turramurra taking into account the cumulative impacts of expected development in the Turramurra Local Centre as well as background growth.

A transport scheme is being developed in consultation with key transport stakeholders, including Transport for NSW and RMS. Council adopted a transport Management Plan for Turramurra local centre on 6 December 2016.

 

Transport for NSW and Sydney Trains both requested that access to the Turramurra Interchange be retained and that no future development is to impact on access. Council’s proposed Masterplan and transport plan for Ray Street and William Street allows for the continued and improved access to the William Street side of the Station.

 

The comments raised by NSW Health (Northern Sydney Local Health District), Ausgrid, Sydney Water and Sydney Trains Property are design and development related, or beyond the scope of the Planning Proposal and master planning process. Where applicable, the matters raised will be considered during the detailed design phase of the Master Plan or through the development application process.

 

Comments

 

1.   Public Hearing – Reclassification 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra

 

A Public Hearing was held on 26 October 2016 into the proposed reclassification under the terms of the Local Government Act 1993. Ms Kara Krason presided as an independent Chairperson. At the Public Hearing, six (6) people gave oral submissions:

 

·     Janet Harwood;

·     Janine Kitson;

·     Scott Marshall;

·     Paul Cooper;

·     Maire Burgess; and

·     Elaine Malicki.

 

Seven (7) written submissions were received in response to the advertising of the public hearing. Both the oral and written submissions have been considered by the Independent Chairperson in their report. 

 

A copy of the Chairpersons report from the public hearing is included as Attachment A5. The report was received by Council on 23 November 2016 and made available on Council’s website on 25 November 2016.

 

The report concludes that land reclassification for 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra not proceed at this point in time and recommends that Council engage and consult with the community as follows:

 

“that Council engage and consult with the community to discuss any required updates to the draft Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan, DCP and Planning Proposal to reflect Council’s chosen location for the future library and community centre on the town square site and any effects the retention of 1275 Pacific Highway (Turramurra Village Park site) as Community land may have on the planning provisions for the new Turramurra Town Centre as a whole”.

 

The reasons for the Chairperson making this recommendation are outlined below along with Council officer’s responses to the reasons given:

 

A.   Chairperson Reason

 

There are differences between the character and function of the existing park at 1275 Pacific Highway which incorporates deep soil landscaping with tall trees and largely passive use and established scenic qualities, compared with the proposed new urban open space areas outlined in the Master Plan, the playground at Cameron Park and Community Garden which all have more active uses.

 

Council Response

 

While the park at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra may be designed for passive use, the poor amenity created by the adjoining Pacific Highway greatly compromises its functionality. In addition the park is on sloping land with difficult access conditions for pedestrians. These are reflected in the very low user rates recorded for the park (reported to Council 8 December 2015).

 

The park is also of a very small size, with an area of 847sqm it is significantly smaller than Council’s preferred park size of 3,000sqm, adopted as part of the Ku-ring-gai Open Space Strategy, 2006. In addition there is no opportunity to expand the size of this park through acquisition to meet these criteria.

 

The master plan proposes a new linear park with an area of 2780sqm which is over three times the size of the existing park; in addition the master plan proposes a town square with a total area of 2300sqm. The total area proposed is 5,080sqm-combined it is almost 6 times the size of the existing park. The linear park, whilst atop a podium, has been designed to allow for a root ball depth/depth of soil which includes mounding for significant trees.

 

Importantly the new linear park does not include the landscape areas within TfNSW ownership – these are potential additional areas of open space. Negotiations are currently underway with TfNSW to realign the existing fencing to enable the railway gardens to become publicly accessible. Public use of the railway gardens will retain the existing significant deep soil planting characteristic of this open space. Similarly, the deep soil planting of mature trees on the eastern boundary of Turramurra Village Park will also be retained as part of the master plan. Refer Figure 3.    

 

Further to this, the new park and town square will be at grade and universally accessible – one of the major constraints for the current park is that it does not meet current accessibility standards.

Figure 1: Master Plan extract showing areas of open space proposed on Council land.

 

Council has also recently acquired over 2,500sqm of land on Gilroy Road, Turramurra to expand an existing park, known as Cameron Park to over 5,000sqm; this park is within a 5 minute walk of the subject site. The Chairperson’s comments could be misinterpreted in implying that the primary function of Cameron Park is as a playground. The expanded and upgraded Cameron Park will actually provide for a multiple of uses including a greater quantity and quality of space for passive recreation than currently exists at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra. Refer Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 2: Concept plan for Cameron Park expansion.

 

It is considered that the public will not be disadvantaged by the reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra as claimed by the chairperson. Given that it has been made clear that the reclassification of all Council lands is necessary to move forward with the master plan as exhibited, the public would gain significant benefit through a six-fold increase in open space in the precinct with minor disadvantage in relation to the loss of the park.

 

Similarly, the chairperson does not acknowledge the public benefits of the proposal in relation to public safety and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). A new mixed use building on 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra would provide ground level shops and upper level residences or offices that would provide “eyes on the street” significantly enhancing the safety of the western station entry precinct.

 

B.  Chairperson Reason

 

The value of the land and open space should not be assessed only by the amount of people who actively use it. The prominent location of this park on the highway with canopy trees and vegetation has a scenic quality that contributes to the character of the area and provides community benefits.

 

Council Response

 

The chairperson has failed to acknowledge that only a portion of the green space is subject to the reclassification; about 560sqm of land is owned by TfNSW and is therefore not proposed for redevelopment. The portion of land owned by TfNSW contains the majority of the significant trees/deep soil planting on the site and will be retained as park and thus provide a vegetated physical and visual connection between the Pacific Highway and the train station. TfNSW have indicated that they have no plans to change this area.

 

A visual analysis has been undertaken and the results are shown below in Figure 3. Figure 3 shows the proposed footprint of a mixed use building, the remaining green space (as owned by TfNSW) and the relative areas of each. The proposed building footprint takes into account a setback along the Pacific Highway for future road widening and does not encroach into adjacent William Street carriageway.

 

Figure 3: Proposed mixed use building footprint on 1275 Pacific Highway

 

Figure 4 below shows an aerial view of the 4 storey building envelope when viewed from the northern side looking to the south over the Pacific Highway. The diagram shows the broad landscaped area that would remain on the eastern side of the proposed building.

 

Figure 4: Proposed mixed use building footprint on 1275 Pacific Highway.

 

C.  Chairperson Reason

 

The draft Master Plan documentation, DCP and Council reports do not clearly articulate a planned or future alternative proposed use for 1275 Pacific Highway should this site not be adopted as the site for the future community building. It is noted that a number of survey responses that selected Option 2 – the Town Square site as the preferred location of the future community building sought the retention of the Turramurra Village Park.

 

Council Response

 

Extensive community consultation undertaken on the development of the master plan has been comprehensively captured in the “Turramurra Community Hub – Community Engagement Output Report”, June 2016. The findings of which were reported to Council on 28 June 2016. A large majority of participants in both the recruited and opt-in workshops supported the location of the proposed community facilities on the town square site (Option 2), with a number of people stating that a building on the Village Park site is more conducive to commercial uses fronting the Pacific Highway; that the opportunity for an iconic mixed use building on this site is preferable; and that the Village Park site is largely underutilised and was better suited to residential use on the basis that an equivalent area of open space was provided elsewhere within the master plan. No major objections were raised on this proposal during exhibition.

 

D.  Chairperson Reason

 

It is clear from the context provided by the DCP, Planning Proposal and draft Master Plan that the intention of reclassifying the subject site was to relocate Turramurra Village Park in order to accommodate a new community building and library in its place. There is a distinct difference and measure of public benefit between redeveloping a park for a community building that would retain a public function and redeveloping a park for a potential commercial or residential use.

 

Council Response

 

The scope and basis for the public hearing would typically be premised on the exhibited Planning Proposal to rezone and reclassify Council land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra.

 

The reclassification of the 3 sites (including the Village Park at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra) within the master plan area should not be considered in isolation, but rather needs to be considered in the context of the whole planning proposal,  including the proposed rezoning and associated justifications. The proposal to rezone 1275 Pacific Highway from RE1 Public Recreation to B2 Local Centre and to relocate the open space is clearly stated throughout the Planning Proposal.

 

It is considered that the Chairperson has erred in linking the decision to reclassify the site to the perceived inconsistency of the planning proposal with the current version of the master plan.

 

As stated in the Planning Proposal:

 

“The objective of this Planning Proposal is to rezone and reclassify Council owned land so as to provide flexibility to implement the future master plan for the Ray Street Precinct, Turramurra”.

 

The emphasis is on facilitating a “future master plan”. At no stage does the Planning Proposal seek to rezone and reclassify the land to facilitate the implementation of a particular version of the master plan, but rather to provide the flexibility for the masterplan to evolve within the context of the proposed zoning and LEP provisions. 

 

This intent is clear from Council’s resolution to include 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra in the planning proposal to rezoning of the site from RE1 Public recreation to B2 Local Centre:

 

“That the existing Planning Proposal applying to the 5 Ray Street and 12 William Street, Turramurra be varied in accordance with section 58 of the EP&A Act as follows:

 

i.    incorporate the site 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra (Turramurra Village Park) (Lot 1 DP 81994);

ii.   reclassify the site from Community land to Operational land and formally seek to discharge all necessary interests applying to the land to enable the implementation of the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan; and

iii.  rezone the site from RE1 Public Recreation to B2 Local Centres with a maximum building height of 17.5m and FSR of 2.5:1”.

 

The Planning Proposal clearly and consistently indicates that the Turramurra Village Park, regardless of its end use e.g. as community building/ commercial/ mixed use site, was always intended to be reclassified and developed as part of the overall master plan. There is no statement or option contained in the Planning Proposal or associated master plan to indicate that if the site was not used for a community building/purpose that it would revert to public park use or a public recreation zoning.

 

Throughout the process it has been explicitly clear that it is Council’s intention to remove the public recreation reserve status that currently applies to 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra. 

 

The Planning Proposal states the following on page 20 - against Section 117 Direction 6.2 – Reserving Land for Public Purposes:

 

“Although the Planning Proposal includes the removal of an RE1 Public Recreation zone from 5 Ray Street and 1275 Pacific Highway, this does not mean there will not be open space provided in the Turramurra centre. The preferred development option 2CA for the Ray Street Precinct shows provision of at least 4,000 square metres of town square and linear park in a similar location to that envisaged in the Local Centres LEP. The precise location for this open space will be firmed up as part of the detailed design of the Turramurra Community Hub. The current strict RE1 zoning applying to these two sites is likely to prevent locating the open space in the optimum location bordering the adjoining retail and residential redevelopment. The current Community Land classification on Council’s land prevents Council offering its land assets into a comprehensive redevelopment scheme involving the private sector”.

 

In fact, if the only options being considered for the use of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra was for the site to remain as open space or to have a community facility such as a public library, there would be no need for Council to seek to rezone and reclassify this site as both these uses would be permissible within the existing RE1 zone.

 

The publicly available information consistently establishes the use of the Village Park as a development site within the master plan to retain the overall viability of the project. Councillors were briefed on this matter on 2 August 2016 and the details were reported to Council on 6 September 2016. In summary it was found that under the current LEP controls, if Council were to leave the Village Park undeveloped, Council would be required to contribute additional funds (which are currently not available) to account for the financial shortfall.

 

Although not considered relevant to Council’s decision on the reclassification of the site, the chairperson is correct in identifying that the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP is inconsistent with the current version of the masterplan. The DCP controls in Section B, Part 14 1B – Turramurra Centre still show a new Turramurra branch library and community centre on the site of the Turramurra Village Park.

 

This inconsistency has eventuated because Council adopted the DCP on 14 June 2016 and the decision to relocate the community facilities to the to the town square location occurred on 20 September 2016. As with the master planning process at Lindfield, however, the process is iterative, with both DCP and amendments to statutory planning occurring after masterplan adoption to ensure all relevant documents are consistent.

 

It is entirely appropriate to amend the DCP to now make it consistent with Council’s adopted master plan. The EP&A Act requires any amendment to a DCP to go through a further and separate statutory consultation process. This matter is discussed further below.

 

It is also worth noting that no decisions have been made by Council about the ownership of various elements of the project or the delivery method. Retaining some elements of the site as Community Classified land may impede delivery of all or parts of the project by a private sector partner.

 

E.   Chairperson Reason

 

Further public consideration should be undertaken prior to any reclassification of the Turramurra Village Park site to Operational land, which recognises the relocation of the park is no longer required to accommodate a new community building for which the incorporation of this site into the planning proposal was originally intended.

 

Council Response

 

Additional public engagement prior to making a decision on the reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra is not considered necessary.

 

In addition to the extensive community engagement program undertaken to inform the development of the master plan for the entire precinct, the Planning Proposal for reclassification and rezoning has undergone all necessary statutory consultation.

 

As discussed above, further consultation is required to amend the DCP to incorporate the revised master plan, showing the relocated community facilities. This necessitates another statutory exhibition and consultation process under the EP&A Act.

 

Conclusion in relation to reclassification 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra

 

For the reasons outlined above, the chairperson’s recommendation to not proceed with the reclassification at this stage, is not supported.

 

Council has obtained legal advice verifying that Council is not bound by the Public Hearing Chairperson’s recommendations and is able to determine otherwise. Refer Confidential Attachment A6- Legal Advice.

 

This is on the basis that under Section 54 of the EP&A Act, Council is the nominated Relevant Planning Authority (RPA) for the Planning Proposal and the chairperson, as an independent party, cannot fetter Councils authority on making a decision on whether the Planning Proposal should proceed or not. In this instance this report will therefore recommend to proceed with finalising the Planning Proposal to reclassify the site at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra.

 

2.   DCP and Master Plan Integration

 

As discussed above, the current DCP provisions applying to the Ray Street Precinct in Part 14 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP are inconsistent with the latest version of the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan presented to Council. Upon adoption of a final Master Plan for the precinct it would be appropriate to amend that section of the DCP to align it with the adopted master plan

 

The approach taken in the DCP in relation to Council’s other major projects sites where Council does have an adopted master plan, such as the Lindfield Village Green, Lindfield Community Hub and Lindfield Library Sites, has been to align the relevant sections of Part 14 of the DCP with the adopted master plans by including pictorial insertions from the master plans and attachment of masterplan within Part 14R of the DCP.

 

The advantage of embedding the master plan within the DCP is that not only does it provide greater certainty in regard to the development outcomes on these master planned sites, any future amendments to the master plan will trigger a statutory public consultation process to undertake the parallel amendments to the DCP.

 

It should also be noted that the public will again be comprehensively consulted as a part of the DCP amendment process. The draft amendment to the Ku-ring-gai Centres Development Control Plan will be placed on public exhibition in accordance with the requirements of the EP & A Act 1979 and Regulations.

 

3.   Master Plan

 

The draft master plan as exhibited in May 2016 has since been refined to reflect subsequent Council resolutions – the most notable amendment being the location of the proposed community building (including new branch library) on the town square site, denoted as ‘12’ in Figure 5 below.

 

Figure 5 – Revised Master Plan for adoption.

 

Key attributes of the master plan include:

 

·     a branch library (1,750 GFA);

·     a community building (1,500 GFA);

·     linear gardens, leisure gardens and connecting gardens (2,780sqm);

·     town square (2,300sqm);

·     a new mixed use building on the Village Park site with a footprint of approximately 695sqm. Note - this building does not infringe on the William Street road reserve;

·     retail floor space of 6,400 GFA comprising supermarket, supermarket back of house and trailing retail;

·     residential floor space of 18,600 GFA;

·     basement car parking comprising 712 spaces - for use by the public, new residential tenants, supermarket, trailing retail, commuter parking (dependant on finance by TfNSW) and community hub; and

·     on grade car parking comprising ten (10) spaces on Forbes Lane. 

 

Adoption of the revised master plan will form the basis for proceeding to the next phase of the project, namely preparing a business case and determining the most appropriate delivery method, particularly in relation to the inclusion of a bridge over the rail line now that the traffic study has been adopted (refer OMC 6th December 2016).

 

Refer Attachment A7 – Revised Master Plan for adoption. 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

The Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017 and Operational Plan 2016-2017 commits Council to master planning for the revitalisation of the Turramurra Local Centre and surrounding precincts.

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

A range of well planned, clean and safe neighbourhoods and public spaces designed with a strong sense of identity and place.

 

4.1.1-

Plans to revitalise local centres are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community.

 

Progress master planning for the Turramurra Centre and surrounding precincts.

 

Engage with key community stakeholders to identify the requirements for new community facilities and infrastructure.

 

Finalise the reclassification of identified lands as resolved by Council.

A healthy, safe, and diverse community that respects our history, and celebrates our differences in a vibrant culture of learning.

C4.1.2-

New and enhanced open space and recreational facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment.

 

Undertake acquisitions for new parks.

 

Undertake assessment and identify locations for new parks

 

Complete the design for identified parks and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities.

 

Construct parks at identified locations and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities

 

FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN

 

The NSW Government's Fit for the Future initiative required all councils to prepare an Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan demonstrating how all seven Fit for the Future benchmarks would be met by 2016/17, and maintained or improved thereafter.

 

Council's Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal and supporting Implementation Plan underpins the decision to stand alone and not merge with Hornsby Council. The objectives established in the Improvement Proposal and Implementation Plan are embedded in Council's adopted Integrated Planning and Reporting documents including the Revised Delivery Program 2013-2017  and Operational Plan 2015-2016, Long Term Financial Plan 2015/16 to 2024/25 and Asset Management Strategy 2015/16 to 2024/25.

 

Council’s Fit For the Future Improvement Proposal set out the following strategies and outcomes to meet the State Governments Efficiency criteria:

 

EFFICIENCY

Objective

Strategies

Key Milestones

Outcome

Major Local and Town Centres projects i.e. Community Hub projects are commercially feasible in their own right

Projects should include commercial opportunities for Council to offset ongoing operational costs (life cycle costs) of public benefits provided

Masterplans adopted for the Local and Town Centres 2015/2016

 

EOI for the redevelopment of Turramurra Local Centre 2016/2017

 

Redevelopment of Turramurra Local Centre 2016/2017

Masterplans adopted for the Local and Town Centres with development options substantially progressed to deliver community facilities and public benefits

 

It is noted in the NSW Government publication Merger Proposal – Hornsby Shire Council (part) and  Ku-ring-gai Council dated January 2016, that specific reference is made to the proposed merger and the ability to provide the services and infrastructure to the community including the revitalisation of Lindfield, Turramurra and Gordon Town Centres.

 

Governance Matters

 

Planning Proposal

 

The Planning Proposal has been prepared in accordance with Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Section 45 of the Local Government Act 1993 prevents Council from selling, exchanging or otherwise disposing of Community classified land.

 

A public hearing for the reclassification of Council owned land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra was conducted in accordance with Section 29(1) of the Local Government Act 1993 and Section 57(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Council has obtained legal advice verifying that Council is not bound by the Public Hearing Chairperson’s recommendations and is able to recommend otherwise.  Refer Confidential Attachment A6 – Legal Advice.

 

This is on the basis that under Section 54 of the EP&A Act, Council is the nominated Relevant Planning Authority (RPA) for the Planning Proposal and the chairperson, as an independent party, cannot fetter Councils authority on making a decision on whether the Planning proposal should proceed or not.

 

Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP Amendment

 

It is noted, that the Chairperson’s report recommends that the reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway not proceed until Council “engage and consult with the Community to discuss any required updates to the draft Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan, DCP and Planning Proposal to reflect Council’s chosen location for the future library and community centre on the town square site”.

 

Consistent with the chairperson’s recommendation, this report presents a revised masterplan that shows the library and community centre on the town square and clarifies the proposed future development of the village park site at 1275 Pacific Highway. The community’s views on this proposal will be sought as part of the exhibition of the suggested draft DCP amendments.

 

In order to provide additional certainty that the Community Hub will be developed in accordance with Council’s adopted masterplan, it is proposed that the controls in Part 14B (Urban Precincts - Turramurra) of Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan be amended to align with the adopted masterplan. This is consistent with the recently adopted DCP amendments to incorporate the Lindfield Village Green, Lindfield Community Hub and Lindfield Library Site Masterplans within Part 14E, including pictorial insertions from the masterplans and attachment of masterplan within Part 14R.

 

The process for the preparation and implementation of development controls is governed by the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and associated Regulations. Council may amend a development control plan by a subsequent development control plan. A new draft development control plan must be publicly exhibited for at least 28 days

 

While the purpose of a DCP is to provide more detailed provision with respect to development permitted by a LEP, the EP&A Act requires that a DCP cannot be inconsistent with any provisions of the LEP.

 

Risk Management

 

The major risk to Council is reputational. The planning for Turramurra local centre commenced in 2010 with the drafting of the Local Centres LEP; Council has taken 6 years to get to this point. Based on the positive community consultation the master plan received during the public exhibition period and the good will established as a result, Council needs to be aware of the potential negative effect any further delays to the project would have on its reputation, given the amount of resources expended to date and the Turramurra Community’s expectations.

 

A further risk to Council at this point in time is the proposed amalgamation with Hornsby Shire Council. The uncertainty surrounding the pending proclamation could potentially delay necessary investigations into how the master plan may be best delivered. 

 

Financial Considerations

 

To date Council has expended over $450,000.00 on this project including salaries and consultancies. These funds have been sourced from development contributions 2010 Plan Recreational, Cultural & Social Facilities. It is important that Council continues to progress this project, if not Council may be required to repay part of the S94 funds spent to date if the works are not delivered.

 

Council’s Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP) identifies a total of approximately $26 million allocated from the S94 Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan, 2010 for works associated with the Turramurra Community Hub. These funds will be Council’s contribution toward the project and have been taken into account when preparing the preliminary economic feasibility assessment.

 

The funds allocated to this project represent only a proportion of the total development contribution funds that will be available for revitalising the Turramurra local centre as a whole. In the future Council will be undertaking master plans for the other key precincts as funds become available.

 

Social Considerations

 

Council’s Community Strategic Plan 2030, recognises the community’s vision for Ku-ring-gai as a place with infrastructure and facilities which accommodate the needs of the community. The plan further emphasises the desire for a an adopted program for the implementation of new facilities, identified funding sources and a program to maintain Council’s assets at a sustainable standard.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

A number of environmental studies have been undertaken to date for this site. Further necessary due- diligence studies will be undertaken in due course as part of the next phase.

 

Community Consultation

 

The Planning Proposal was placed on public exhibition in accordance with the Gateway Determination from 29 April - 27 May 2016. Advertisements were placed on Council’s website and in the North Shore Times. Information was also made available at Council’s customer service centre at 818 Pacific Highway Gordon, the Turramurra Branch Library and Council Website. The adjoining and surrounding property owners were notified in writing and were given the opportunity to provide feedback during the exhibition period.

 

A public hearing into the reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra was held on 26 October 2016 in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1993. All persons who made a submission to the planning proposal or public hearing were notified of this matter being reported back to Council.

 

In addition to this, the master plan has been the subject of rigorous community consultation during 2016.

 

Turramurra Community Hub - Draft Masterplan communication summary:

 

·     Exhibition Period -  30th April to 29th May 2016, including an on-site information kiosk (demountable) available during the first 3 weeks of the exhibition period, with information also available at the Turramurra Branch Library and on the Council Website;

 

·     Launch Event – on site, Saturday 30th April 2016.

 

·     Drop in Sessionson site information kiosk in the carpark on William Street Turramurra open/staffed at the following dates/times:

 

Tuesdays 3,10, 17 May, 2016 - 11am-3.00pm

Thursdays 5,12, 19 May, 2016 - 3pm-7pm

·     Workshops - at the Turramurra Masonic Hall:

 

Recruited Workshop - Tuesday 17th May 2016; and

Opt In Workshop - Thursday 19th May 2016.

Youth Workshop – Turramurra Library (Lower Meeting Room) May 2016.

 

·     Consultation Website Have your Say/Activate Turramurra. These sites include:

 

Detailed background information including reports, plans/images and video;

Online discussion forums;

Feedback/suggestion forms; and

Q&A.

 

·     Community Group Meetings – offer to local interest groups including Support Turramurra, Beautify Turramurra and Eastern Road Group for face to face briefings;

 

·     Media Release Media release issued 22/4/2016 - Community Information Day for the Turramurra Community Hub Master plan;

 

·     North Shore Times  North Shore Times article 27/05/2016.

 

·     Councillor information Turramurra Community Hub Master plan 2/5/2016 - Consultation - information to councillors.

 

·     Information available at Council’s customer service centre at 818 Pacific Highway, Gordon and the Turramurra Branch Library & the Council Website.

 

Internal Consultation

 

This report was prepared by the Strategy & Environment Department in consultation with staff from other Departments where relevant.

 

Since 2014, ten (10) information sessions have been held for Councillors, namely:

 

1.   Briefing on 8 October 2014 at which consultants presented a draft site analysis, design principles, preliminary design options and financial assessment.

2.   Presentation of draft design options to Councillors at two site inspections held on 22 and 28 October 2014. At the final site inspection chalk markings were provided around the site to assist Councillors in understanding the design options.

3.   Briefing to Councillors on 1 December 2014 on the draft Turramurra Community Facilities Study as well as the Ku-ring-gai Community Facilities Strategy (LGA wide).

4.   Briefing session was held on 4 June 2015 to update councillors on the Draft Master Plan for the site.

5.   Briefing session was held on 4 August 2015 to present to Councillors the completed draft master plan and model.

6.   Question and Answer session was held on 8 December 2015 to present to Councillors the refined master plan, taking into account AEC’s recommendations, prior to the council meeting.

7.   Meeting with Councillors, staff and consultants was convened on 2 August 2016 to discuss Councillor’s ‘aspects of concern’ regarding the exhibited draft master plan. A number of questions were raised by Councillors both before and after OMC 28 June 2016 and were largely centred around the issues of the location of community facilities within the Ray Street Precinct, the built form and height of proposed development, Turramurra Village Park and traffic and transport - each of which was comprehensively addressed at this meeting.

8.   Briefing to Councillors on 8 November 2016 on the Turramurra Transport Management Plan by consultants and staff.

9.   Councillor update on 31 October 2016 attended by RMS and consultants.

10. Question and Answer session was held on 22 November 2016 to update Councillors on the discussions with Coles to date and the subsequent amendments to the draft master plan as exhibited, addressing a number of design and operational concerns raised by Coles during recent discussions. 

 

Summary

 

Council commenced a Planning Proposal to rezone and reclassify its lands within the Ray Street Precinct on 12 November 2013 after considering a report on its future landholdings in light of a supermarket development application by Coles Property Development Group.

 

The Planning Proposal was placed on public exhibition from 19 April 2016 to 27 May 2016. A Public Hearing on the reclassification of 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra was held on 26 October 2016 in accordance with Section 57(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Section 29 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993.

 

The Chairperson’s report on the reclassification of the Turramurra Village Park (1275 Pacific Highway) recommended that the reclassification not proceed until the community have been consulted on a revised masterplan and amended DCP controls that reflect Council’s adopted location for the future library and community centre on the town square site.

 

This report examines the Chairperson’s reasons for not proceeding with reclassification at this stage and the reasons why Council officers do not support the Chairperson’s recommendations. Council has obtained legal advice confirming that Council is not bound by the Public Hearing Chairperson’s recommendations and is able to recommend otherwise.

 

Accordingly this report presents a revised masterplan that takes into account Council’s resolutions to date in relation to the location of the proposed community building on the town square site, including modifications to the proposed lower ground floor; and clarifies the proposed development footprint and envelope at 1275 Pacific Highway - this amendment involves a reduction of the proposed building footprint on the Park site so as not to impact on the William Street road reserve when compared to the draft master plan as exhibited.

 

This report recommends amended DCP controls, that would facilitate the implementation of the revised master plan, be placed on public exhibition providing the community the opportunity to have further input into the master plan outcomes.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council adopts the Planning Proposal to amend the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012 to rezone and reclassify Council owned land at 1275 Pacific Highway, Turramurra.

 

B.   That the Planning Proposal be submitted to the Department of Planning and Environment in accordance with Section 59 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the Greater Sydney Commission be requested to make the plan.

 

C.   That those who made submissions be notified of Councils decision.

 

D.   Council adopt the Turramurra Community Hub Master Plan as described in this report and attached and in summary includes:

 

I.    a Community Building comprising a community centre and branch library located adjoining the proposed town square site with a total area of  - minimum 3000sqm;

II.   open space (linear/leisure gardens) – 2780sqm;

III.  town square – 2300sqm;

IV.  residential – 18,600sqm;

V.   retail – 6,360sqm; and

VI.  streetscape improvements – Forbes Lane, Ray Street and William Street.

 

E.   That Section B, Part 14 1B – Turramurra Centre of Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan be amended to be consistent with the Council’s adopted master plan.

 

F.   That the draft amendment to the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan be placed on public exhibition in accordance with the requirements of the EP&A Act 1979 and Regulations.

 

G.   That a report be brought back to Council after the exhibition.

 

H.   Council proceed to the next phase of the Turramurra Community Hub project which involves the preparation of a business case and investigation of preferred delivery method.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bill Royal

Team Leader Urban Design

 

 

 

 

Alexandra Plumb

Urban Planner

 

 

 

 

Louise Drum

Senior Urban Designer

 

 

 

 

Craige Wyse

Team Leader Urban Planning

 

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Gateway Determination - Turramurra

 

2016/102085

 

A2

Planning Proposal - Turramurra - Rezone and Reclassify 5 Ray Street, 12 William Street and 1275 Pacific Highway - Amended as per Gateway Determination Conditions for Exhibition

 

2016/106297

 

A3

Submission Summary Table - 1275 Pacific Highway Turramurra

 

2016/359154

 

A4

Summary State Agency Submissions

 

2016/359160

 

A5

KMC Public Hearing Report 1275 Pacific Highway Turramurra

 

2016/329839

 

A6

Legal Advice 

 

Confidential

 

A7

Turramurra Master Plan - prepared by Chrofi

 

2017/016980

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Gateway Determination - Turramurra

 

Item No: GB.9

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 2 - Planning Proposal - Turramurra - Rezone and Reclassify 5 Ray Street, 12 William Street and 1275 Pacific Highway - Amended as per Gateway Determination Conditions for Exhibition

 

Item No: GB.9

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 3 - Submission Summary Table - 1275 Pacific Highway Turramurra

 

Item No: GB.9

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 4 - Summary State Agency Submissions

 

Item No: GB.9

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 5 - KMC Public Hearing Report 1275 Pacific Highway Turramurra

 

Item No: GB.9

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 7 - Turramurra Master Plan - prepared by Chrofi

 

Item No: GB.9

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.10 / 371

 

 

Item GB.10

S10147

 

15 December 2016

 

 

Fitzsimons Lane Gordon - Draft Voluntary Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon - Post Exhibition Report

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To report back following the exhibition of the Draft Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon.

 

 

background:

The Local Centres Development Control Plan and Public Domain Plan make provision for the widening of Fitzsimons Lane for improved vehicular access and pedestrian amenity.  Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 makes provision for the completion of the streetscape works but not the acquisition of the land because it minimises the costs of acquisition to enable the developments to retain the potential to utilise the floor space of the sliver of land involved and to dedicate the residual portion free of cost.

 

 

comments:

Following the extended statutory exhibition period, the Draft Planning Agreement is now being reported back to Council for approval to execute it and complete the dedication process.

 

 

recommendation:

 

That Council resolves to enter into the Planning Agreement with WN Developments Pty Ltd as specified within the attached document to facilitate the dedication of land for the purposes of widening Fitzsimons Lane Gordon and delegation be granted to the General Manager and Mayor to execute the Planning Agreement, under Common Seal.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To report back following the exhibition of the Draft Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon.

 

Background

 

This report follows the statutory exhibition of the Draft Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon for the purposes of dedicating land along the Fitzsimons Lane frontage.  The intention is to allow for the widening Fitzsimons Lane and the delivery of future public domain improvements including improvements to the pedestrian environment.

 

This is the first of three current or prospective planning agreements allowing for land dedication to facilitate the widening of Fitzsimons Lane and future public domain improvements. Letters of offer have been received for the other two properties.

 

Planning for Gordon Local Centre

 

As part of the strategic planning framework for Gordon, provisions were made for the rather angular Fitzsimons Lane, which narrows near the intersection with Merriwa Street, to be widened and realigned to provide improved vehicular access and pedestrian amenity to this area of Gordon.  The area around Fitzsimons Lane is undergoing significant urban renewal with ten consolidated properties either under construction, under DA or pre-DA. 

 

Until recently this area was primarily commercial in nature, with multi-storey corporate offices.  The redevelopment of this mixed-use zoned area has seen primarily residential redevelopment including mainly ground floor non-residential floor space for professional consulting rooms, cafés, small convenience retail uses and local service uses.

 

Extract from the Public Domain Plan 2010 showing the location of the area targeted for widening

 

The strategic planning documents including the Local Centres Development Control Plan, the Public Domain Plan and the supporting Contributions Plan, collectively envisaged that the development potential of that narrow sliver of land would be available to the development site, stripping its market value and facilitating its dedication in the most cost effective manner – enabling the contribution plan to focus on the delivery of high quality public domain works.

 

As the land itself is therefore not valued by the contribution plan, a Planning Agreement approach is triggered to facilitate the dedication.  This is the first Draft Planning Agreement reported for adoption and execution as part of this process.

 

The intention of the dedications is to facilitate the widening of Fitzsimons Lane to 15 metres where it currently narrows close to the intersection with Merriwa Street to facilitate traffic and pedestrian improvements, particularly the latter to activate the lane.

 

The Draft Planning Agreement itself is a relatively straightforward document compared to planning agreements that facilitate the delivery of works and infrastructure; this agreement relates only to the dedication, free of cost, of a sliver of land in a triangular shape, totalling 82.5sqm, and stretching 34.69 metres along the Fitzsimons Lane frontage.

 

Comments

 

Previous Council Report and Exhibition

 

At the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday 6 December 2016, Council resolved as follows:-

 

A.   That public notice of the exhibition of the draft Planning Agreement and Explanatory Note relating to the property at 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon for the purposes of facilitating a land dedication along the frontage to Fitzsimons Lane be duly given, and a copy of those documents be made available for inspection, in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

B.   That a report be brought back to Council following the statutory exhibition process.

 

C.   That delegation be granted to the General Manager or his delegate to make any administrative changes to the document that do not alter the overall intent in order to facilitate exhibition and to protect Council’s interests.

 

D.   That the letter of offer to enter into a planning agreement for the dedication of land along the frontage to Fitzsimons Lane of the property located at 900 Pacific Highway Gordon in association with DA0226/16 be noted and authority be delegated to the General Manager or his delegate to progress the draft planning agreement in discussions with the applicant.

 

E.   That the design process for the Fitzsimons Lane public domain improvements commence as soon as practicable in 2017.

 

F.   That the General Manager or his delegate be authorised to proactively pursue the completion of the negotiations for the draft planning agreement for the remaining property at 870-898 Pacific Highway which also has rear frontage to Fitzsimons Lane which has recently been on-sold, in line with the original letters of offer from the former property owner, with a view to enabling the public domain works to Fitzsimons Lane to be delivered concurrently and in the short term.

 

The first three resolutions relate to the Draft Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon that is the subject of this report.

 

The Draft Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon

 

The Draft Planning Agreement Attachment A1 and the associated Explanatory Note (included within the document) are relatively straightforward documents in that they simply facilitate and explain the dedication of an identified area of land free-of-cost to council.  They record the nature of the understanding between the developer and Council.  For example, Council can only use the land for the purposes of works to the carriageway, both vehicular and pedestrian and associated street landscaping works in Fitzsimons Lane.  This is in accordance with the Local Centres DCP and Public Domain Plan.

 

Importantly the Draft Planning Agreement does not include works to deliver the public domain improvements; however, Council should instigate the design process early in 2017 given the progress of a substantial percentage of the anticipated redevelopment in the Fitzsimons Lane precinct, preparatory to commencing the delivery phase.

 

Extended Exhibition

 

In accordance with the resolution, the Draft Planning Agreement and accompanying Explanatory Note was placed on public exhibition from Thursday 15 December 2016 to Tuesday 24 January 2017 inclusive.  At the close of the exhibition period, no submissions were received.

 

Attached Plan of Subdivision

 

In view of the time constraints and the importance of exhibiting this Draft Planning Agreement prior to the end of the year, the attachment to the exhibition was a plan of subdivision including all three development sites affected by the Fitzsimons Lane widening.  This necessitated clarification that the Draft Planning Agreement related to only one of the three properties.

 

Council’s surveyor has now distilled this single survey plan of three properties into three separate survey plans so that each affected property has a separate survey plan.  Other than the division of the properties, the details remain the same as exhibited for the sole property that is the subject of this VPA being 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon.

 

The legal teams representing both Council and the developer are in general agreement that the plan relating only to the relevant property and including the same details as exhibited in the larger plan can be included at this juncture.  Now that a separate plan exists, it would be inappropriate to include a survey plan illustrating other properties that are still the subject of negotiations.

 

Minor amendments could still be made to the survey plan prior to lodgement to satisfy any additional requirements of the subdivision process including ensuring that the land becomes part of a public road and into Council’s ownership on registration.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Theme Three: Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai

Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development

P8.1.1.1.1.1-2

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan

2010 ensures new development contributes towards the cost of delivering supporting infrastructure.

P4.1 Our centres offer a broad

range of shops and services and contain lively urban village spaces where people can live, work, shop, meet and spend leisure time

Plans to revitalise local

centres are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community

C6.1.2.1.2; C4.1.2.1.3

New public infrastructure is planned to support new development and ensure that everyone who lives and works in Ku-ring-gai continues to

enjoy access to public facilities.

P8.1 An improved standard of infrastructure that meets the community’s service level standards and Council’s obligations as the custodian of our community’s assets

Our public infrastructure and assets are planned, managed and funded to meet community expectations, defined levels of service and address inter-generational equity

C6.1.2.1.2; C4.1.2.1.3

New public infrastructure is planned to support new development and ensure that everyone who lives and works in Ku-ring-gai continues to

enjoy access to public facilities.

 

Theme Four: Access, Traffic and Transport

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

T1.1 A range of integrated transport choices are available to enable effective movement to, from and around Ku-ring-gai.

 

T3.1 An accessible public transport and regional road network that meets the diverse and changing needs of the community.

A network of safe and

convenient links to local centres, major land uses and recreational opportunities is in place

 

A strategic access, traffic

and transport plan is being implemented for the Northern Sydney Region

T 1.1.3.1.1

Link roads and road widening.

 

Theme Six: Leadership and Governance

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

L2.1 Council rigorously

manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services

Council expenditure satisfies

the needs of the community and Council has increased its commitment to infrastructure asset management priorities

C6.1.1.1.2

Council is leveraging the value of its assets to combine with contributions to deliver major community assets.

 

FIT FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT ACTION PLAN

 

This matter relates to ‘business as usual’ for Ku-ring-gai Council continuing to work towards the delivery of infrastructure to support redevelopment in the LGA.

 

Governance Matters

 

The negotiation of the Draft Planning Agreement was commenced under the Planning Agreement Policy 2008.  Since then, the Planning Agreement Policy 2016 has been exhibited and adopted.

 

The Draft Planning Agreements have been prepared with input from Urban Planning, the Property Unit and the Corporate Lawyer.  Council appointed Wiltshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers to act on their behalf.  The developers for the first Draft Planning Agreement that is proposed to be exhibited were represented by Addisons Lawyers.

 

Risk Management

 

Council has commissioned an external legal team to assist with the drafting of the Planning Agreements.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The strategic planning for the widening of Fitzsimons Lane foreshadowed that the associated developments would retain the opportunity to utilise the floor space potential of the land to be dedicated thus negating its market.  This is a cost-effective means of facilitating the dedication of land free of cost.  The land area is very small, only 82.5sqm, but its dedication will enhance the pedestrian presentation of the new development to Fitzsimons Lane.

 

There is a cost in terms of the recommended scheduling of the design and delivery of the works in the 2017/2018 to 2018/2019 financial year in the Long Term Financial Plan however, it should be noted, that with ten out of thirteen properties with frontage to Fitzsimons Lane being the subject of development proposals and many nearing completion of construction, that the development contributions for the delivery of this work have been received and, as such, it is timely to schedule the delivery of this work in the near future.

 

Social Considerations

 

The widening of Fitzsimons Lane will facilitate an improved vehicular and pedestrian environment as this area rapidly transitions from an employment area to a mixed use zone featuring predominantly residential development.  These improvements have long been envisaged in the original Local Centres Development Control Plan and the Public Domain Plan and are now coming to fruition concurrent with redevelopment under the Local Centres LEP.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

The Draft Planning Agreement that is the subject of this report involves land dedication only.  The design of the public domain improvements should be instigated in parallel with these latest redevelopments ready to commence delivery concurrent with their completion.  Environmental considerations are a core component of the detailed design of all Council’s public domain improvement works.

 

Community Consultation

 

The Draft Planning Agreement together with its explanatory note and draft plan of subdivision was placed on statutory exhibition on Thursday 15 December 2016.  The exhibition was extended in view of the holiday period and concluded on Tuesday 24 January 2017.

 

The exhibition was advertised in the North Shore Times and a letter was sent to all the properties that had been notified as part of the original Development Application on the subject property but with updated details from the current property database.  This process resulted in 762 letters being sent to owners and occupiers of surrounding properties.  At the close of the extended exhibition period, no submissions had been received.

 

Internal Consultation

 

The Draft Planning Agreement has been prepared in consultation between officers of Urban Planning and the Property Unit and Council’s Corporate Lawyer.  Council engaged additional legal support from Wiltshire Webb as well as the services of a surveyor.

 

Summary

 

It is recommended that the Draft Planning Agreement be adopted unchanged from the exhibition version with one exception.  It is recommended that the draft survey plan illustrating the Fitzsimons Lane frontage of three separate properties which are each the subject of three separate negotiation processes, be replaced by the survey plan showing only the property that is the subject of this Planning Agreement. 

 

It is noted that, in respect of this property, the information shown on each survey plan in relation to the wedge-shaped sliver of land of 82.5sqm to be dedicated along 34.69m of the present Fitzsimons Lane boundary is essentially the same.  The more detailed plan is able to include additional details relating to the property as a whole.  This facilitates the next processes that are intended to shortly follow execution, which are the subdivision and the dedication of Lot 1 to Council as that takes effect.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council resolve to enter into the Planning Agreement with WN Developments Pty Ltd as specified within Attachment A1 to facilitate the dedication of land for the purposes of widening Fitzsimons Lane Gordon.

 

B.   That the Council grant delegation to the General Manager and Mayor to execute the Planning Agreement, under Common Seal.

 

C.   That delegation be granted to the General Manager or his delegate to make any minor administrative changes to the document that do not alter the overall intent in order to protect Council’s interests.

 

D.   That delegation be granted to the General Manager or his delegate to authorise any minor changes to the survey drawing and associated administration sheets to ensure the objectives of the VPA are fulfilled in the most practical and efficient manner.

 

E.   That the Planning Agreement register be updated to include the Planning Agreement for 904-914 Pacific Highway Gordon on execution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kate Paterson

Infrastructure Co-ordinator

 

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Draft Planning Agreement as Exhibited

 

2016/330008

 

A2

Draft Plan of Submission for Attachment to Planning Agreement

 

2017/018292

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Draft Planning Agreement as Exhibited

 

Item No: GB.10

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator


APPENDIX No: 2 - Draft Plan of Submission for Attachment to Planning Agreement

 

Item No: GB.10

 

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.11 / 403

 

 

Item GB.11

S10894/2

 

12 December 2016

 

 

Tender T06/2016 - NTRA Sportsfield Car Park and Landscape Works

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the tenders received for the construction of NTRA Sportsfield Car Park and Landscape works and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

 

background:

Council as part of the Open Space Capital Works Program approved funding for the redevelopment of NTRA including the construction of a new car park which will also provide additional netball training facilities adjacent to the newly constructed sports fields. Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 1 November 2016 with a closing date of 6 December 2016.

 

 

comments:

Tender documents were produced with four (4) submissions received.  The submissions were assessed using agreed criteria which identified the best value to Council.

 

 

recommendation:

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended that Council accept the tender submitted by Tenderer ‘A’.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To consider the tenders received for the construction of NTRA Sportsfield Car Park and Landscape works and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Background

 

Council as part of the Open Space Capital Works Program approved funding for the redevelopment of NTRA including the construction of a new car park which will also provide additional netball training facilities adjacent to the newly constructed sports fields. Following consultation with internal and external stakeholders, designs and specifications were finalised with Tender documents being prepared by the Operations Department and released through Tenderlink on 1 November 2016 with a closing date of 6 December 2016.

 

As the cost of the works was estimated to be over $150,000, Tenders were called using Tenderlink in accordance with the tender requirements of the Local Government Act and Regulation.

 

Comments

 

Four (4) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy.

 

Tenders were received from the following companies:

 

·     All Civil Solutions Group Pty Ltd

·     North Shore Paving Co Pty Ltd

·     Romba Pty Ltd

·     Wade Civil Engineering Pty Ltd

 

It should be noted the order above does not correspond to the order of the list of tenderers named from ‘A’ to ‘D’ in the list of tenders received. (Attachment 1)

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations and Strategy & Environment Departments was formed to assess the four (4) tenders received.  The evaluation took into account:

 

·     Conformity of submission

·     lump sum fee,

·     company and staff experience,

·     ability to provide the full range of services required,

·     work program, and availability,

·     previous performance in relation to similar type work, and

·     company’s financial capacity.

 

Confidential attachments to this report include:

 

·     List of tenders received and additional financial information (Attachment 1),

·     Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation (Attachment 2), and

·     an independent Performance and Financial Assessment which was carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd (Attachment 3).

 

From the four (4) submissions received and the available information taken into account during the evaluation and scoring of each element of the assessment, Tenderer ‘A’ was identified as providing the best value to Council.

 

In order to ensure Council is not exposed to financial risk and confirm that Tenderer ‘A’ is trading in a sound and profitable manner, an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd. The independent report concluded that Tenderer ‘A’ scored at a level that was a low risk to Council and are considered to be financially sound and capable of carrying out these works.

 

Tenderer ‘A’ was identified as providing the ‘best value’ to Council.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Enhance Recreation, Sporting and Leisure Facilities. Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective Delivery Program Term Achievement Operational Plan Task P6.1 Recreation, sporting and leisure facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs.

 

A program is being implemented to improve existing recreational, sporting and leisure facilities and facilitate the establishment of new facilities and deliver park asset refurbishment program at priority locations.

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P6.1 Recreation, sporting and leisure facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs.

 

A program is being implemented to improve existing recreational, sporting and leisure facilities and facilitate the establishment of new facilities.

 

Deliver park asset refurbishment program at priority locations.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 1 November 2016 with a closing date of 6 December 2016. At the close of tender, four (4) tenders were received. All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations Department and Strategy & Environment Department was formed to assess the four (4) tenders received. The evaluation took into account:

 

·     Conformity of submission

·     lump sum fee,

·     company and staff experience,

·     ability to provide the full range of services required,

·     work program, and availability,

·     previous performance in relation to similar type work, and

·     company’s financial capacity.

 

Confidential attachments to this report include the list of tenders received, the Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation and the independent Performance and Financial Assessment carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd.  The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(iii) of The Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.

 

Risk Management

 

Four (4) key areas of risk were identified in relation to the proposed work:

 

·     That work needed to be carried out by a suitably qualified company with experience of Car park construction.

 

·     Availability – the company was available to commence work within a few weeks of the work being awarded.

 

·     Ability and previous experience of working in close proximity to environmentally sensitive areas.

 

·     That Council should not be exposed to financial risk - as part of the evaluation process, tenderers were assessed on providing all information and costs requested within the tender document and an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out on the preferred tenderer to ensure that they were trading responsibly and had the financial capacity to undertake the work as detailed within the tender documents.

 

Following evaluation, including an independent Performance and Financial Assessment of Tenderer ‘A’ by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd, the tenderer assessed as providing the best value and quality to Council was Tenderer ‘A’. As part of the independent Financial and Performance Assessment the following areas were examined:

 

·     Tenderer ‘A’ has the financial capacity to undertake the proposed value of work;

 

·     that Tenderer ‘A’ has been trading in a profitable and responsible manner during the last three (3) years; and

 

·     that Tenderer ‘A’ has sufficient assets/reserves to cover all possible debts during the period of work.

 

The financial aspect of the assessment shows Tenderer ‘A’ is able to satisfy all requirements and is unlikely to expose Council to any financial risk if awarded the tender as detailed within Council’s tender documents.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Council’s allocated funds within the Capital Works Program 2016/2017 for the construction of a new car park at NTRA Sportfields which has been designed to allow on completion additional facilities for netball training when not in use as a car park. The proposed is essential to provide parking facilities for the newly completed sports and training fields, these consisting of both natural turf and synthetic fields.

 

During the planning and design stages of NTRA, it was always identified that additional parking would be required for the new sportsfields. Following the tender assessment additional funding will be required over the present available funds. The additional funding required will be allocated from the 2017 / 2018 budget.

 

A breakdown of the proposed funds required for the project is shown on the confidential attachment - Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation (Attachment 2).

 

Social Considerations

 

Following the redevelopment of the North Turramurra Recreational Area which includes three new sports fields and training areas there is an expectation that it will be extensively used by the local community. The new facilities have been designed to provide for families, individuals, schools and club use and to provide for both social and competition sport at many levels. As part of expected increased use of the site it has been identified that the existing parking facilities need to be extended.

 

The proposed works are in accordance with Council’s adopted plan for NTRA. The proposed works will substantially improve the recreational value, improve general access and safety and create greater opportunities for social interaction as well as providing health and wellbeing. Public access and use of the new sports field will be impacted during the construction although it will not be necessary to completely close the sports field during the construction period.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

The construction works are being carried out as part of the redevelopment works of North Turramurra Recreational Area and will not impact on the surrounding areas. The proposed works aim to provide not only car park facilities but also provide additional netball training facilities. As part of standard construction works and practices, suitable environmental management controls will be implemented by the appointed contractor during the works. All works will be undertaken in accordance with already prepared environmental assessments.

 

Community Consultation

 

As part of the redevelopment of NTRA community and sports club consultation has been carried out prior to finalising the present proposed design.

 

The design aims to provide improved additional car parking facilities which will also double up as netball training facilities. Prior to the commencement of on-site works, local residents and user groups will be advised of the commencement of works and be provided with a time estimate for the completion of the works.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Consultation was undertaken and included officers from Strategy & Environment Department, Operations and Community Departments all being consulted.

 

Summary

 

Following internal and external consultation, final preparation of plans and specification took place with tender documents being released through Tenderlink on 1 November 2016 with a closing date for receipt of tenders of 6 December 2016.

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel was formed consisting of representatives from Operations Department and Strategy & Environment Department. At the close of tender, four (4) tenders were received. All tenders were recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy.

 

Following the evaluation and independent performance and financial check, it is recommended Tenderer ‘A’ be appointed on the basis of providing the best quality and value to Council.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council accept the tender submission from Tenderer ‘A’ to carry out the construction of the NTRA Sportsfield Car Park and Landscape works, Bobbin Head Road, North Turramurra.

 

B.   That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.

 

C.   That the Seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.

 

D.   That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Morris

Manager Projects

 

 

 

 

Matthew Drago

Acting Director Operations

 

 

Attachments:

A1

List of Tenders received

 

Confidential

 

A2

Tender Evaluation Panel's recommendation

 

Confidential

 

A3

Corporate Scorecard Assessments

 

Confidential

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 7 February 2017

GB.12 / 409

 

 

Item GB.12

S05650

 

12 December 2016

 

 

Council Sponsorship -Turramurra Rotary Graffiti Removal Program 2016/2017

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To seek Council’s endorsement to provide additional funding to Turramurra Rotary for the cleaning of graffiti from business and private property in the Turramurra and St Ives area.

 

 

background:

Turramurra Rotary established a volunteer graffiti removal service to assist the community with the cleaning of graffiti from businesses and private property in the Turramurra area. They are now also assisting St Ives Rotary with the cleaning of graffiti in the St Ives area.

 

 

comments:

Turramurra Rotary is seeking additional funding of $5,000 to help continue their service. As there is no funding available in the sponsorship budget, the funding will need to be provided from the Building Maintenance Budget.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council approve the request from Turramurra Rotary for $5,000 with funds to be provided from the Building Maintenance Recurrent Budget.

 

 

 


  

Purpose of Report

To seek Council’s endorsement to provide additional funding to Turramurra Rotary for the cleaning of graffiti from business and private property in the Turramurra and St Ives area.

 

Background

 

Turramurra Rotary established a volunteer graffiti removal service to assist the community with the cleaning of graffiti from businesses and private property in the Turramurra area. They are now also assisting St Ives Rotary with the cleaning of graffiti in the St Ives area.

 

Comments

 

Turramurra Rotary is seeking additional funding of $5,000 to help continue their service. As there is no funding available in the sponsorship budget, the funding will need to be provided from the Building Maintenance Recurrent Budget.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

A range of well planned, clean and safe neighbourhoods and public spaces designed with a strong sense of identity and place.

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

Opportunities are provided to our community to contribute to plans for enhancing the local area and visual amenity of our centres.

 

Develop an agreed level of service for removal of graffiti and cleaning of areas to instil community pride.

 

Oversee graffiti removal response and report six monthly on actual vs targets for removal of graffiti on public land.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

Not applicable

 

Risk Management

 

The funding is required to assist with the continuation of the cleaning of graffiti from businesses and private property. If funding is not available, the service would be able to continue.

 

Financial Considerations

 

As there are no funds available in the sponsorship budget for 2016/17, funding will need to be provided from the Building Maintenance Recurrent Budget.

 

 

 

 

Social Considerations

 

The regular cleaning of graffiti by Council and the Service groups helps to deter vandalism and also improves the appearance of the area.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Cleaning of graffiti on a regular basis helps deter vandalism and improves the amenity and environment of the area.

 

Community Consultation

 

Not applicable

 

Internal Consultation

 

Consultation has taken place with staff from Community who have advised there is no funding available in the sponsorship budget for the request.

 

Summary

 

Turramurra Rotary established a volunteer graffiti removal service to assist the community with the cleaning of graffiti from businesses and private property in the Turramurra area. They are now also assisting St Ives Rotary with the cleaning of graffiti in the St Ives area.

 

Turramurra Rotary is seeking additional funding of $5,000 to help continue their service. As there is no funding available in the sponsorship budget, the funding will need to be provided from the Building Maintenance Recurrent Budget.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council approve the request from Turramurra Rotary for $5,000 with funds to be provided from the Building Maintenance Recurrent Budget.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greg Piconi

Director Operations

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Sponsorship Agreement - Turramurra Rotary Graffiti Removal Program

 

2016/354138

  


APPENDIX No: 1 - Sponsorship Agreement - Turramurra Rotary Graffiti Removal Program

 

Item No: GB.12

 

PDF Creator


 

PDF Creator