Ordinary Meeting of Council

TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 18 July 2017 AT 7:00 pm

Level 3, Council Chamber

 

Agenda

** ** ** ** ** **

 

 

NOTE:  For Full Details, See Council’s Website –

www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers

 

 

APOLOGIEs

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

 

Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting

 

NOTE:

 

That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:

 

GB.7  Lindfield Community Hub - RFT 12/2017 - Legal Services Tender

Attachment A1:       Tenderer Weighted Scorecard - Summary Results

In accordance with 10A2(d)(i)(ii)

Attachment A2:       Tender Evaluation Report

In accordance with 10A2(d)(i)(ii)

 

 

Address the Council

NOTE:           Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be tape recorded.

 

 

Documents Circulated to Councillors

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council                                                                         7

 

File: S02131

Meeting held 27 June 2017

Minutes numbered 142 to 162

 

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

 

Petitions

 

PT.1         Middle Harbour Heritage Conservation Area (Fifty Six [56] Signatures)             74

 

File: S11160

 

‘We, the undersigned, petition against the proposed Middle Harbour Road Conservation area for the following reasons:

·     The recommendation is based on erroneous and misleading information and mapping;

·     The area has no merit in being a Heritage Conservation Area; and

·     We request that the Council develop a set of reasonable standards to be inserted in Schedule 3 – Variations of the NSW State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008, to ensure that any new development is consistent with the current character of the area.’

 

PT.2         Re-Seal Roadway - Southern end of Wellington Road/Ulmarra Place East Lindfield - [One Hundred and Seven (107) Signatures]                                                               75

 

File: 88/06211/01

 

“We the undersigned would like to request that the Mayor of Ku-ring-gai Council look into the condition of the lower reaches of Wellington Road, East Lindfield from Carlyle Road to the Retirement Village, East Lindfield Gardens, administered by the Aveo Group.

 

We believe an earlier request for an inspection of the same has occurred.

 

The upper reaches of Wellington road was renewed after Ausgrid’s final work was completed. The residents were led to believe that ALL of Wellington Road and Ulmarra Place would be resurfaced.

 

We feel that since the storms and rains during March 2017, the road has significantly deteriorated and subsidence of the middle part of the road has increased. The nature of this stretch of road has tight bends, parked cars and is frequently used by trucks and buses, and especially emergency vehicles, therefore rending it a risk to the elderly residents of the Village because avoiding the subsidence is extremely difficult. This repair job has been outstanding for some considerable time.

 

As a group we realise that Council has its schedules and priorities. We request that the road be totally renewed and the matter given prompt attention.”

  

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

i.               The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.

 

ii.             The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.

 

 

GB.1        Draft Destination Management Plan                                                                             76

 

File: S11243

 

To present the revised draft Ku-ring-gai Destination Management Plan to Council following the statutory public exhibition period.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council adopt the revised draft Ku-ring-gai Tourism Destination Management Plan 2017-2020.

 

GB.2        Investment Report as at 30 June 2017                                                                         84

 

File: S05273

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for June 2017.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the summary of investments performance for June 2017 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

GB.3        497 - 507 Pacific Highway Killara, Fire Saftey Concern referred by Fire & Rescue NSW.                                                                                                                                      93

 

File: CY00070/9

 

To report to Council the findings of an inspection by Fire & Rescue New South Wales of a residential unit development, at 497 – 507 Pacific Highway, Killara which revealed fire protection measures were not being adequately serviced and maintained for the protection of the building’s occupants. To seek Council’s endorsement to serve appropriate orders.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council, as the regulatory authority, exercise its powers under Section121B of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979 to serve Orders 6a & 6b on the owners of Strata Plan SP 86801, located at 497–507 Pacific Highway, Killara, so as to ensure the safety of the occupants of the building and integrity of the structure.

 

GB.4        24-28 Holford Crescent, Gordon - Demolition of existing structures and construction of a seniors living development comprising 16 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works - Integrated Development (NSW Rural Fire Service under the RFS Act 1997)                                                                                                                   105

 

File: DA0249/16

 

Ward: Gordon

Applicant: Crawford Architects Pty Ltd

Owner: Mr Bin Xu

 

Demolition of existing structures and construction of a seniors living development comprising 16 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval

 

GB.5        Minutes of the Heritage Reference Committee                                                        191

 

File: CY00413/5

 

Council to consider the minutes of the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) meetings held on 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council receives and notes the Heritage Reference Committee meeting minutes from 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017.

 

GB.6        Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 - Amendment to Gordon-Killara Catchment Map                                                                                                                                              195

 

File: S06785/3

 

To update the catchment mapping in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect the recommended zoning and development potential.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the amended contributions catchment mapping be placed on statutory exhibition for a minimum of 28 days and that a report be returned to Council after the close of exhibition.

 

GB.7        Lindfield Community Hub - RFT 12/2017 - Legal Services Tender                     201

 

File: S10973-14

 

To consider the tenders received for the engagement of a Legal Firm to provide legal advice and services throughout the procurement phase of the Lindfield Community Hub project (the Project).

 

Recommendation:

 

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 it is recommended that Council accept the tender submitted by Tenderer ‘1’.

 

GB.8        Modication of Existing Easement -
47 Carbeen Avenue St Ives                                                                                          
209

 

File: CY00066/9

 

To consider a request to relocate Council’s stormwater infrastructure and extinguish an existing Council drainage easement (Dealing G549181) over 47 Carbeen Avenue, St Ives.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council grant approval for the extinguishment of the existing easement and creation of a new easement subject to conditions of this report. 

  

Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting

 

 

Motions of which due Notice has been given

 

NM.1        Lindfield Learning Village - Updated Heads of Agreement                                   214

 

File: S08640/3

 

Notice of Rescission from Councillors Szatow, Citer and Pettett dated 29 June 2017

 

We move to rescind negotiation by Council with the NSW Department of Education on the capital and operational costs associated with public use of the auditorium facility at the Lindfield Learning Village.

 

NM.2        At Grade Parking St Ives Village Green                                                                      215

 

File: S07533

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Berlioz dated 10 July 2017

 

The plans for right angle carparking proposed in the SIVG Masterplan will result in the loss of street trees and more importantly the apparent loss of native vegetation on Cowan Road and a number of significant trees on the Green along Memorial Avenue.

 

According to the Masterplan, the current pathway and verge would be replaced by a pathway measuring 2.5metres.

 

The replacement pathway would run parallel to the road to replace the existing verge and pathway and the boundary of the Green would be set back into the Green. It appears this will result in the removal of a number of significant original trees in Memorial Avenue, in addition to reducing the net area of Village Green by a around 300 sqm.

 

Along Cowan Road, the right angle carparking would require the removal of native vegetation for the relocation of the pathway.

 

There is currently congestion and competition for carparking in St Ives as the retail/commercial businesses adjacent the Greenhave not provided adequate car-parking.  There consequently exists a shortfall of about 450 car spaces that is provided by council owned carparks. 

 

The 20 hectare site Village Green site was acquired in 1948 and a Committee of residents fund raised for the facilities on the Green and started tree planting in 1953.  At grade carparking is required to service the users of the Green. However, it is unacceptable that St Ives residents should pay for the car parking shortfall by retail /commercial owners with the loss of significant green open space and vegetation on such a significant open space. This is particularly objectionable when council plans to dispose of the existing council at grade carparks.

 

I move that, for the right angle carparking proposal on Memorial Avenue and on Cowan Road, a report come back to council with:

 

1.   An overlay of the vegetation mapping on the plans for right angle car parking on Cowan Road and Memorial Avenue. These plans must include a scale drawing of the proposed relocated pathways and adjusted boundary to the Village Green in addition to the identification of all trees to be removed or which will be affected by construction within their TPZ zone.

 

2.   Council present other options for provision of at-grade parking to service the users of the Village Green that do not compromise the size of the Green or require removal of vegetation.

 

 

BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS

 

 

Questions Without Notice

 

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

 

** ** ** ** ** **


Minute                                           Ku-ring-gai Council                                               Page

MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 27 June 2017

 

Present:

The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson (Chairperson)

Councillors E Malicki & J Pettett (Comenarra Ward)

Councillors C Szatow & D Citer (Gordon Ward)

Councillors C Berlioz & D Ossip (St Ives Ward)

Councillor D Armstrong (Roseville Ward)

Councillors C Fornari-Orsmond & D McDonald (Wahroonga Ward)

 

 

Staff Present:

General Manager (John McKee)

Director Corporate (David Marshall)

Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic)

Director Operations (Greg Piconi)

Acting Director Strategy & Environment (Antony Fabbro) until 7.40pm

Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson)

Director Community (Janice Bevan)

Corporate Lawyer (Jamie Taylor)

Manager Corporate Communications (Virginia Leafe)

Minutes Secretary (Christine Dunand)

Minutes Secretary (Sigrid Banzer)

 

 

Others Present:

Manager Finance (Angela Apostol)

Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets (Deborah Silva)

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning (Antony Fabbro)

Project Manager – Major Projects (Nicole Gershel)

 

 

 

The Meeting commenced at 7:00 pm

 

The Mayor offered the Prayer

 

 

Apologies

 

The General Manager advised that Director Strategy and Environment would be arriving late due to council business, and Mr Fabbro would be Acting Manager Strategy & Environment until he arrived.

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.

 

Councillor McDonald declared a less than significant non-pecuniary interest in item GB.1 – Northern Sydney Science Hub, he has a business in food science and technology which involves interactions with CSIRO and other organisations, and would remain in the Chamber during debate.

 

Councillor Citer declared less than significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in item GB.8 259-271 Pacific Highway Lindfield – Lindfield Library Site, he is a former Manager of KYDS which occupied that building, and advised that he would leave the Chamber during debate.

 

Councillor Ossip declared a less than significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in item GB.4 Planning Proposal – Deferred Area 15 – Killara Golf Club as the law firm who employs him represents Killara Golf Club, and advised he would leave the Chamber during debate.

 

The General Manager declared a conflict of interest in item C.1 General Manager Performance Review and advised that he and the staff would leave the Chamber during debate.

 

 

141

CONFIRMATION OF REPORTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN CLOSED MEETING

 

File: S02499/9

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/McDonald)

 

A       That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of the confidential attachment to the following General Business report:

 

GB.8    259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield - Lindfield Library Site

 

Attachment A1: Valuation of Lindfield Library site

In accordance with s10A(2)(c)

 

B       That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of the following confidential report and its attachment:

 

C.1      General Manager Performance Review

In accordance with s10A(2)(a)

 

Attachment A1: GM Performance Agreement - 2017 Annual Report – Final version for report to Council

In accordance s10A(2)(a)

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS

 

The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:

 

Late Items:

MM.1     Retirement of Greg Piconi - Director Operations

Mayoral Minute from Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson dated 27 June 2017.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

142

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council

File: S02131

 

 

Meeting held 13 June 2017

Minutes numbered 123 to 140

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)

 

That Minutes numbered 123 to 140 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Ossip arrived

 

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

143

Queen's Birthday Honours 2017

 

File: S02767

Vide: MM.1

 

 

I am pleased to inform you that 13 Ku-ring-gai citizens, through their outstanding achievements and services to the community, have been awarded 2017 Queen’s Birthday Honours.

 

We are very proud to have these dedicated and talented Australians as members of the Ku-ring-gai community.

 

I would like to read to you the names of these special Ku-ring-gai citizens and, on behalf of Council, congratulate them on their excellent contributions to Australian society.

 

Richard James ALCOCK AO of Warrawee, for distinguished service to the community, particularly through health management roles, and to the law, corporate governance, and higher education organisations

 

Ian Clifton CARROLL AM of Killara, for significant service to conservation, particularly through management of the built, cultural and natural heritage sector

 

Valerie Marie DOYLE OAM  of Turramurra, for service to the community through the Australian Red Cross

 

Joan Helen HARRIS OAM  of Wahroonga, for service to community history

 

Paul Ronald HEATHER  AM  of North Turramurra, for significant service to the building and construction industry through leadership of professional bodies, and to industry based education

 

Ian Perry HYMAN OAM  of Warrawee, for service to people with disability

 

Victoria Eva KVISLE OAM  of Killara, for service to cancer research organisations, and to the community

 

Robert Allan LOVE AM  of South Turramurra, for significant service to the performing arts, particularly in Western Sydney, as an administrator, and as a supporter of independent artists

 

Ashak Nanji NATHWANI  AM  of Wahroonga, for significant service to the Ismaili community in Australia, to tertiary education in the area of sustainable design, and to engineering.

 

David Robert RICHES  PSM     of Lindfield, for outstanding public service to the built infrastructure in New South Wales

 

Reginald Phillip ST LEON  OAM of Wahroonga, for service to the multicultural community, and to education

 

Antony John VARRALL  OAM of Turramurra, for service to people with a disability

 

Ann Myra YOUL OAM  of East Killara, for service to the community through a range of organisations

 

On behalf of Council, I congratulate all these award winners on their outstanding achievements.

 

Ku-ring-gai should be proud that it has so many citizens being recognised at the highest levels for their selfless dedication, commitment and contribution to local, national and international communities.

 

 

Resolved:

 

A.   That Council acknowledge the outstanding contribution made by these recipients of 2017 Queen’s Birthday Honours to the Ku-ring-gai community and to the well-being of our society.

 

B.   That the Mayor, on behalf of Council, write to the recipients to congratulate them.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

  

 

144

Retirement of Greg Piconi - Director Operations

 

File: CY00455/5

Vide: MM.2

 

 

It is my honour to pay tribute this evening to Council’s Director of Operations, Greg Piconi, who is retiring from his position in early July 2017.

 

As Mayor, on behalf my Councillor colleagues and the Ku-ring-gai community, I want to thank Greg most sincerely for his devoted service to Ku-ring-gai for the last 15 years.

 

Greg joined Ku-ring-gai Council in 2002, when the Council was grappling with demands from the NSW Government to provide more housing and infrastructure as part of its overall plan for managing Sydney’s population growth. It was a time of political turmoil and restructuring for the organisation and Greg was the ideal person to take on the responsibility of providing more infrastructure and new facilities for Ku-ring-gai’s expanding community.

 

Greg was tasked with prioritising and managing the Council’s capital works program. As part of his role, he successfully applied for an infrastructure levy to provide more funding for the significant capital projects the Council needed to deliver. These included a new Council depot, a new headquarters for the SES and RFS and the $27 million redevelopment of the North Turramurra golf course into a multipurpose recreational and sporting area.

 

Greg’s quiet demeanour partners with a sharp intellect and a distinguished record of public service.

 

Greg graduated with a degree in civil engineering from the University of New South Wales in 1978 and started work with what was then called the Department of Main Roads as a bridge designer.  He designed a number of bridges, including several over the Sydney to Newcastle motorway and at Tweed Heads.

 

Greg’s design skills were then tested through work on sections of the Prospect Highway and the connections to the M4 and M5 freeways. During the 1980s he supervised construction of the bridge over the Murray River at Tocumwal, among others, and works on Homebush Bay Drive and Epping Road. Greg oversaw several large and challenging projects including construction of the Gore Hill Freeway and of the bridge over the railway line at Flemington.

 

In 1992 Greg entered local government by joining Ashfield Council as its Works Manager. At Ashfield he supervised the construction of the new community centre at Summer Hill and the upgrade to the Ashfield Aquatic Centre. These projects would give him an invaluable understanding of building community-based infrastructure.

 

Since joining the Council in 2002, Greg and his staff have delivered numerous projects, upgrades and new facilities to the Ku-ring-gai community. As Director, Greg has been responsible for managing around 300 frontline employees, whose tasks include maintenance, civil engineering and design, construction, fire safety management and environmental protection works.

 

I have briefly touched on some of the largest projects Greg has managed in his 15 years at Council. Here is a more comprehensive but by no means inclusive list of projects he has either directly managed or made a significant contribution to behind the scenes. By their breadth they show in a most compelling way how his work has touched the lives of all who live in Ku-ring-gai:

 

               Creation of a championship standard 18 hole golf course, three new sportsfields, walking trails, artificial wetlands and new car parks known as the North Turramurra Recreation Area

               Redevelopment of the former West Pymble Pool into a multipurpose recreational facility known as the Ku-ring-gai Fitness & Aquatic Centre

               Creation of a new library and youth centre at Gordon

               Construction of the new headquarters for SES and RFS personnel at Wahroonga

               Construction of a new Council depot and workshops at Pymble

               Construction of the Jubes Mountain Bike Trail, baseball diamonds and new playground at Golden Jubilee Oval Wahroonga

               New parks, playgrounds and sportsfields at Cameron Park, Turramurra; Charles Bean Oval Lindfield; Greengate Park and Koola Park Killara and Lapwing Reserve St Ives

               Major upgrades to playgrounds, facilities and sportsfields at Wahroonga Park, Bancroft Park, Allan Small Park, Curtilage Park, Turramurra Memorial Park and Warrimoo Oval to name just a few

               A long term strategy for managing Ku-ring-gai’s community assets such as roads, public buildings and spaces, ensuring that maintenance and upgrades are fully funded in the future.

 

In his final year as Director, Greg has worked with the senior management team to produce a capital works program of $54 million for the coming year for his successor to implement.

 

Greg leaves Council secure in the knowledge that his contribution will live on in the buildings, facilities and open spaces that generations of Ku-ring-gai residents will enjoy in the future. Those who have had the pleasure of working with Greg have come to know and respect a man of integrity who confidently and expertly undertakes his responsibilities but who has also never been reticent to review and refine where he can see improved benefits for stakeholders. He truly exemplifies the ethos of service to the community.

 

On behalf of the Council and our community, I wish Greg a long, happy and fulfilling retirement. We will miss your steady leadership long after you have gone, but you leave with our lasting gratitude and best wishes for this next chapter of your life.

 

 

Resolved:

 

That the above Mayoral Minute as printed be adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

145

Northern Sydney Science Hub

 

File: S11581

Vide: GB.1

 

 

To seek endorsement from Council for Ku-ring-gai Council to become a member of the Northern Sydney Science Hub.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)

 

That Council endorse membership of the Northern Sydney Science Hub as outlined in this report.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

146

Investment Report as at 31 May 2017

 

File: S05273

Vide: GB.2

 

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for May 2017.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Armstrong)

 

A.       That the summary of investments and performance for May 2017 be received and noted.

 

B.       That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

147

9, 11 & 11A Livingstone Ave, Pymble - Demolition of existing structures and construction of a residential flat development containing 22 units, basement parking and landscaping works

 

File: DA0115/16

Vide: GB.3

 

 

Demolition of existing structures and construction of a residential flat development containing 22 units, basement parking and landscaping works

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Malicki)

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 80(1) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

 

A.   THAT Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the request submitted under clause 4.6 of KLEP (Local Centres) 2012 to vary the building height development standard has met the requirements of clause 4.6(4). Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standard is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case and that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the variation to the development standard.

 

AND

 

B.   THAT Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the proposed development will be in the public interest, grant deferred commencement development consent to DA0115/16 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a residential flat development containing 22 units, basement parking and landscaping works on land at 9, 11 & 11A Livingstone Avenue, Pymble. Pursuant to Section 95(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within two years from the date on which the consent becomes operable.

 

SCHEDULE A: Deferred Commencement – Term(s) to be satisfied prior to the consent becoming operable

 

Evidence required to satisfy the following condition must be submitted to Council within twenty four (24) months of the date of this consent. This consent will lapse if all deferred commencement conditions are not satisfied within twenty four (24) months of the date of this consent.

 

Drainage easement (deferred commencement)

 

1.       The applicant shall submit documentary evidence that the property benefits from a        registered drainage easement or easements over all downstream properties as far as      the public drainage system. This consent will not operate until the documentary          evidence has been submitted to and approved by Council’s Development Engineer.  This          documentation must include evidence that the easement has been registered with NSW         Land and Property Information.

 

Reason:         To ensure that provision is made for stormwater drainage from the site in a proper manner that protects adjoining properties.

 

Once the consent becomes operable, the conditions in Schedule B will apply. Upon written receipt from Council that the deferred commencement condition in Schedule A has been satisfied, the following conditions will apply:

 

SCHEDULE B: Conditions of consent:-

 

CONDITIONS THAT IDENTIFY APPROVED PLANS:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

DA023-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA101-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA102-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA102a

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA103-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA104-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA105-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA106-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA107-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA200-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA203-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA300-Rev.A

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA301

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA302

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA303

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

DA1000

Brewster Murray

Nov 2016

Stormwater plans:

H5500-Rev.B

J&M Group

11/02/16

H5501-Rev.C

J&M Group

23/11/16

H5502-Rev.C

J&M Group

23/11/16

H5503-Rev.C

J&M Group

23/11/16

H5504-Rev.C

J&M Group

23/11/16

Landscape plans:

DA L01B

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

DA L02B

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

DA L03B

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

DA L04B

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

 

Document(s)

Dated

Flood Impact Study letter (Storm Consulting)

4 June 2015

Flood Impact Study (Storm Consulting)

7 May 2015

Water Cycle Management Plan (J&M Group)

11 February 2016

Geotechnical Investigation (Asset Geotechnical)

24 September 2015

Basix certificate No. 701686M_05

10 May 2017

Vegetation Management Plan (Keystone Ecological)

26 February 2016

Sample board – DA1200 (Brewster Murray)

February 2016

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Approved Vegetation Management Plan (VMP)

 

Vegetation Management Plan works shall be carried out in accordance with the amended Vegetation Management Plan prepared by Keystone Ecological as amended by conditions of this consent.

 

·           All works detailed within the VMP-revegetation, weed removal, weed techniques, environmental protection measures and proposed planting are to be carried out in accordance with the amended VMP.

·           All noxious and environmental weeds are to be removed from within the VMP area.

 

·           All works at all times within the Blue Gum High Forest community are to be conducted by a suitably qualified bush regenerator. The minimum qualifications and experience (for bush regenerator) are a TAFE Certificate 2 in Bushland Regeneration and one year demonstrated experience (for other personnel).  In addition, the site supervisor is to be eligible for full professional membership of the Australian Association of Bush Regenerators (AABR).

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection and enhancement of Blue Gum High Forest and the area of biodiversity significance and riparian lands.

 

3.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

4.     Lot consolidation

 

Prior to the commencement of works, the applicant must consolidate Lot C DP 391729, Lot 2 DP 540437 and Lot 1 DP 540437 into one allotment which will form the development site. Evidence of lot consolidation, in the form of a plan registered with the Land and Property Information must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority, prior to works commencing.

 

Reason:       To facilitate the orderly development of land.

 

5.     Fauna protection

 

Prior to works commencing and/or tree removal works a qualified ecologist shall investigate trees/vegetation for fauna occupation. 

 

Prior to the removal of tree/vegetation an ecologist is to install four nest boxes within close proximity to the area in which tree removal is being undertaken. Two medium mammal box and 2 small bird/mammal box are to be installed within indigenous trees to be retained within the site. Nest boxes are to be installed at a height of greater than 5m and positioned on the south-eastern side of trees.

 

The ecologist shall supervise the relocation of any fauna found within the trees into the installed nest boxes in accordance with appropriate licensing requirements.

 

The qualified ecologist must hold an Animal Ethics Permit from the Department of Industry & Investment  and a wildlife licence under section 132C of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 issued by the Office of Environment & Heritage. Evidence of engagement of the qualified ecologist and the required licensing must be provided to the Private Certifying Authority with a copy to Council prior to the trees being removed.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of fauna species.

 

6.     Project arborist

 

A suitably qualified project arborist (AQF level 5) is to be engaged to advise the Principal Certifying Authority on the protection of trees at the site and to supervise the installation and maintenance of tree protection measures required by this consent.

 

Prior to the commencement of any works including demolition on the site in areas required to be protected by this consent, the project arborist shall inspect the site and satisfy himself/herself that the protection measures  are in accordance with the approved design and must provide a written certification to the Principal Certifying Authority to that effect.

 

If not satisfied, the project arborist must provide to the Principal Certifying Authority a list of works that are to be completed to ensure compliance with all conditions of consent relating to the protection of trees at the site. Those works must be undertaken to the satisfaction of the project arborist.

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

7.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by Safe Work NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

8.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

9.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

10.   Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·        Full road pavement width, including kerb and gutter, of Livingstone Avenue over the site frontage, including the full intersection.

·        All driveway crossings and laybacks opposite the subject site.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:    A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

11.   Archival recording of buildings

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that an archival report has been submitted to Council’s Heritage Advisor.

 

The report must consist of an archival standard photographic record of the building (internally and externally), its garden and views of it from the street illustrating its relationship to neighbouring properties and the streetscape. Recording shall be undertaken in accordance with the guidelines for “Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006)” prepared by the New South Wales Heritage Office.

 

Information shall be bound in an A4 report format.  It shall include copies of photographs, referenced to plans of the site.  Two (2) copies (one (1) copy to include negatives or CD of images shall be submitted to Council's Heritage Advisor.  The recording document will be held in the local studies collection of Ku-ring-gai Library, the local historical society and Council’s files.

 

Note:    A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure the proper management of historical artefacts and to ensure their preservation.

 

12.   Dilapidation survey and report (private property)

 

Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Address:

·  10 Pymble Avenue

·  7 and 15 Livingstone Avenue

 

The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.

 

In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.

 

Note:    A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.

 

13.   Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The CTMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metres long heavy rigid vehicle.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·             Demolition

·             Excavation

·             Concrete pour

·             Construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·             Traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site.

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users. 

 

For safety and amenity, no construction vehicle movements are to occur in Livingstone Avenue during school drop-off (8.00am to 9.30am) and pick up (2.30pm to 4.00pm) times on school days.

 

When a satisfactory CTMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved CTMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines may be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:         To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

14.   Erosion and drainage management

 

Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.  The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction". Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

15.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

Tree 1 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

14.4m

Tree 3 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

7.2m

Tree 6 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located within the front setback of the site

5.0m

Tree 7 / Liquidambar styraciflua (Liquidambar)

located within the nature strip

3.6m

Tree 8 / Franklinia axillaris (Gordonia)

located within the nature strip

2.4m

Tree 10 / Franklinia axillaris (Gordonia)

located within the nature strip

2.4m

Tree 27 / Pyrus sp. located within the nature strip

2.0m

Tree 30 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located at the south-western corner of the site, within the adjoining property

2.0m

Tree 37 – 40 / located along the south-west boundary

2.0m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

16.   Tree protection fencing excluding structure

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy excluding that area of the approved excavation for private courtyards shall be fenced off for the specified radius from the trunk to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site:

 

Tree/Location

Radius in metres

Tree 2 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

10.2m

Tree 4 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the front setback of the site

8.4m

Tree 5 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located within the front setback of the site

3.6m

Tree 49 / Syzygium paniculatum (Brush Cherry)

located at the north-eastern corner of the site

8.4m

Tree 50 / Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor laurel)

located at the north-eastern corner of the site

15.0m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

17.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metres spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

18.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

Tree protection zone

 

·          this fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted

·          any encroachment not previously approved within the tree protection zone shall be the subject of an arborist's report

·          the arborist's report shall provide proof that no other alternative is available.

·          the arborist's report shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for further consultation with Council

·          the name, address, and telephone number of the developer

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

19.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, an inspection of the site by the Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

20.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:    The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

21.   Noise and vibration management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.  The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.

 

The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:

 

·          identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources

·          identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment

·          the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent

·          the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent

·          determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver

·          noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures

·          assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions

·          description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction

·          construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency

·          procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration

·          contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.

 

22.   CCTV report of existing Council pipe system near works

 

Prior to the commencement of any works on site, qualified practitioners must undertake a closed circuit television inspection and then report on the existing condition of the Council drainage pipeline traversing the subject property. The report must be provided to Council’s, Development Engineer and is to include a copy of the video footage of the pipeline. A written acknowledgment from Council’s Development Engineer (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) shall be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

Reason:         To protect Council’s infrastructure.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

23.   Design amendments

 

Prior to issue of a Construction Certificate, the following design changes are to be demonstrated on amended plans to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority:

 

a)       The balustrade height is to be reduced to 1.1 metres (maximum) for unit E09 and the pedestrian bridge linking the two buildings.

 

b)       The southern bedroom of Unit F21 is to be increased in area to achieve a minimum dimension in any direction of 3 metres and a minimum area of 9m2. This may be achieved by moving the hallway further to the north.

 

c)       A stair is to be provided to access the common open space to the south east of the riparian zone. The stair is to be located in front of unit A05 and 1.5 metres (minimum) width.

 

d)       Lockable mail boxes are to be:

i)     provided close to the street; and

ii)    90 degrees to the street and to Australia Post standards; and

iii)   integrated with front fences or building entries.

 

Reason:       Residential amenity.

 

24.   Storage facilities in units

 

Architectural plans are to be amended to demonstrate accessible storage facilities for all units at the following rates:

 

-      two-bedroom apartments               8m3

-      three plus bedroom apartments     10m3

 

At least 50% of which must be within the units and is in addition to kitchen and bathroom cupboards and bedroom wardrobes.

 

Amended plans demonstrating the above are to be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority, prior to issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:       Residential amenity.

 

 

 

25.   Amended Vegetation Management Plan (VMP)

 

The Vegetation Management Plan (VMP), prepared by Keystone Ecological, dated February 2016 version (Ref KMC. 15-740), is to be amended in accordance with this condition.

 

An amended VMP is to be provided to the Certifying Authority and copied to Council prior to the release of the Construction Certificate that addresses the following points below.

 

·           management zones are to be amended to reflect the approved development

·           the type and number of each species to be planted within each management zone is to be detailed within the amended VMP

·           the maintenance period for the VMP is to be extended from 2 to 5 years

·           monitoring reports are to be provided to the principal certifying authority and copied to Council every 6 months from the commencement of vegetation management works

·           only local provenance material is to be planted no cultivar varieties are to be planted within Blue Gum High Forest management zones

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection and enhancement of Blue Gum High Forest and the area of biodiversity significance and riparian lands.

 

26.   Tanked basement design

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the basement has been designed to be waterproof (tanked) as required under Part 22.3-4 of Ku-ring-gai DCP and by DPI Water Ref: 10ERM2016/0201 dated 3 May 2016.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

27.   Driveway design

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the structural drawings show that the section of driveway over the drainage easement has been designed to be lightweight and readily removable to allow for future maintenance of the pipe. 

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

28.   Amendments to approved landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Title

Drawn by

Dated

DA L01B

Basement and Existing Tree Plan

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

DA L02B

Ground Floor Landscape Plan

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

DA L03B

Level 1 Floor Plan

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

DA L04B

Level 2 Floor Plan

Site Design and Studios

29/11/16

 

The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended as follows:

 

1.         Trees 31-36 are to be shown to be retained and protected.

 

2.         The access path along the northern boundary of the riparian area/communal open space is to be set back a minimum of 2 metres from the boundary to allow for screen planting. The ‘shared bay’ as indicated as footpath/pebbles on the landscape plan is to be relocated south of the shared bay to connect with the path as amended above.

 

3.         The entry path to Units A01-A04 is to be set back from the eastern boundary of the front setback by a minimum of 3 metres to allow for screen planting. A maintenance access path is to be provided to the eastern boundary of Building A and to common space at the northern and western setback of Building B.

 

4.         The communal open space in the front setback is to be deleted and planted as per the western section of the front setback.

 

5.         The BBQ area is to be relocated to the western end of the central communal open space with an accessible path from Building A provided from the basement lift.

 

6.         Clotheslines are to be deleted within private open space within the front setback of Units A01-A06.

 

7.         Existing levels are to be retained to the garden bed along eastern boundary of Block B.  Retaining walls with top of wall levels are to be shown as required along access path within eastern setback of Building B, particularly at the south-eastern corner of Building B. Access from B10 to maintenance path is to be relocated to northern boundary of private open space to allow for stairs (RL115.20) and path to communal open space (RL112.73). 

 

8.         Canopy trees are to be provided in association with screen planting along the western and eastern setbacks of Building B. Screen planting to side boundaries are not to be monoculture hedges but grouped assorted species.

 

9.         Planting detail is to be shown to the Basement Floor level on the Basement and Existing Tree Plan landscape plan.

 

10.       Details of the proposed surface treatment under the proposed pedestrian entry ‘bridge’ and driveway ‘bridge’ are to be provided.

 

11.       Unit numbers are to be shown.

 

12.       Proposed levels to external paths and steps are to be shown. Existing and proposed levels to the front setback, including the nature strip are to be provided. No additional retaining walls are permitted.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the amended landscape plan has been submitted as required by this condition.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

29.   Amendments to approved environmental site management plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved environmental site management plan, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Title

Drawn by

Dated

DA 1000

Environmental Site Management Plan

Brewster Murray

November 2016

 

The above environmental site management plan(s) shall be amended as follows:

 

1.         A note is to be added that during demolition existing paved areas are used for truck access where possible.

 

2.         Trees 31-36 are to be shown to be retained and protected. Stockpiles and material storage are to be relocated from within their tree protection zones.

 

3.         Tree protection fencing is to be shown in accordance with arborist recommendations and other conditions of consent. Riparian zone is to be protected in accordance with Vegetation Management Plan.

 

4.         Ground protection is to be shown where access or storage is required within tree protection zones of trees to be retained.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the amended environmental site management plan has been submitted as required by this condition.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

30.   Amendments to approved engineering plans

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved engineering plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

Water Cycle Management Plan

J&M Group

11.2.16

H5500B & H5501C - H5504C

J&M Group

23.11.16

 

The above engineering plan(s) shall be amended as follows:

 

The Water Cycle Management Plan is to be amended to refer to Part 24 of

Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP. Re-use of retained roofwater is to be nominated to achieve Council's target of a 50% reduction in runoff days, and shown on the Construction Certificate plans.

 

Note:    An amended engineering plan, prepared by a qualified engineer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

31.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

32.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

33.   Outdoor lighting

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Note:    Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse impacts on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.

 

34.   Air drying facilities

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.

 

In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Amenity & energy efficiency.

 

35.   External service pipes and the like prohibited

 

Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building.  Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans.  Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.

 

Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation.  The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.

 

36.   Access for people with disabilities (residential)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities shall be clearly shown on the  plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, and the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12.

 

Reason:         To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

37.   Adaptable units

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the nominated adaptable units within the development application are designed as adaptable housing in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS4299-1995: Adaptable Housing.

 

Note:    Evidence from an appropriately qualified professional demonstrating compliance with this control is to be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Disabled access & amenity.

 

38.   Excavation for services

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that no proposed underground services (ie: water, sewerage, drainage, gas or other service) unless previously approved by conditions of consent, are located beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council’s Tree Preservation Order, located on the subject allotment and adjoining allotments.

 

Note:    A plan detailing the routes of these services and trees protected under the Tree Preservation Order shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of trees.

 

39.   Recycling and waste management

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the development provides a common garbage collection/separation area sufficient in size to store all wheelie garbage bins and recycling bins provided by Council for the number of units in the development in accordance with Council’s Local Centres DCP. The garbage collection point is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services.

 

The responsibility for:

 

·        the cleaning of waste rooms and waste service compartments; and

·        the transfer of bins within the property, and to the collection point once the development is in use;

 

shall be determined when designing the system and clearly stated in the Waste Management Plan.

 

Reason:         Environmental protection.

 

 

40.   Noise from plant in residential zone

 

Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm –6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.

 

C1.   Note:    A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.

 

Reason:         To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.

 

41.   Location of plant (residential flat buildings)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.

 

C1.   Note:    Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.

 

42.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

43.   Driveway grades - basement carparks

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:

 

·           vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and

·           all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles. 

 

If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

44.   Basement car parking details

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:

 

·           all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking”

·           a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement

·           no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area

·           the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

45.   Car parking allocation

 

Car parking within the development shall be allocated in the following way:

 

Resident car spaces

29

Visitor spaces

4

Total spaces

33

 

Each adaptable dwelling must be provided with car parking complying with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.

 

At least one visitor space shall also comply with the dimensional and location requirements of AS2890.1 - parking spaces for people with disabilities.

 

Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.

 

46.   Bicycle spaces

 

The bicycle parking spaces within the basement shall be designed in accordance with AS2890.3. Details shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To provide alternative modes of transport to and from the site.

 

47.   Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in Livingstone Avenue:

 

·           Footpath directly behind the kerb for the full site frontage

 

Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve.  The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.

 

The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works.  Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 - 1996 - Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads - Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.

 

A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.

 

48.   Energy Australia requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.

 

49.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

50.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:         To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

51.   Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee

 

To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

(a)      All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

(b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

(c)      The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

(d)      In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.

 

(e)      In this condition:

 

“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:         To maintain public infrastructure.

 

52.   Section 94 Contributions - Centres

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Infrastructure Type                                                                      Total

LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural                                                  $41,956.03

Pymble TC Local Parks & Sporting Facilities                                         $374,584.36

Pymble TC New Roads & Road Mods                                                       $60,811.38

Pymble TC Townscape Transport & Pedest Fac                                     $164,290.62

 

Development Contributions Total                                        $641,642.39

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:       To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

53.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

54.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·          the work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·          in the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence

·          if the development involves an excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building, structure or work (including any structure or work within a road or rail corridor) on adjoining land, the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense:

 

(a)      protect and support the building, structure or work from possible damage from the excavation, and

(b)      where necessary, underpin the building, structure or work to prevent any such damage.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement.

 

55.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:    Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

56.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

57.   Engineering fees

 

For the purpose of any development related inspections by Ku-ring-gai Council engineers, the corresponding fees set out in Councils adopted Schedule of Fees and Charges are payable to Council. A re-inspection fee per visit may be charged where work is unprepared at the requested time of inspection, or where remedial work is unsatisfactory and a further inspection is required. Engineering fees must be paid in full prior to any final consent from Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

58.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

59.   Construction noise

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.

 

60.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·           be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·           display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·           be durable and weatherproof

·           display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·           be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

61.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·           physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·           earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·           all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·           the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·           all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·           all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·           gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·           cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

62.   Further geotechnical input

 

The geotechnical and hydro-geological works implementation, inspection, testing and monitoring program for the excavation and construction works must be in accordance with the report by Asset Geotechnical dated 24 September 2015. Over the course of the works, a qualified geotechnical/hydro-geological engineer must complete the following:

 

·           further geotechnical investigations and testing recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary

·           further monitoring and inspection at the hold points recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary

·           written report(s) including certification(s) of the geotechnical inspection, testing and monitoring programs

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

63.   Compliance with submitted geotechnical report

 

A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.

 

Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:

 

·           appropriate excavation method and vibration control

·           support and retention of excavated faces

·           hydro-geological considerations

 

must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by Asset Geotechnical dated 24 September 2015. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

64.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

65.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

66.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

 

 

67.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

68.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

69.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·           are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·           are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·           are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·           refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·           are restricted to one such sign per property

·           do not exceed 2.5m2

·           are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

70.   Approval for rock anchors

 

Approval is to be obtained from the property owner for any anchors proposed beneath adjoining private property.  If such approval cannot be obtained, then the excavated faces are to be shored or propped in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical and structural engineers.

 

Reason:         To ensure the ongoing safety and protection of property.

 

 

71.   Maintenance period for works in public road

 

A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

72.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

73.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

74.   Temporary rock anchors

 

If the use of temporary rock anchors extending into the road reserve is proposed, then approval must be obtained from Council and/or the Roads and Traffic Authority in accordance with Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993.  The Applicant is to submit details of all the work that is to be considered, and the works are not to commence until approval has been granted.  The designs are to include details of the following:

 

·           How the temporary rock anchors will be left in a way that they will not harm or interfere with any future excavation in the public road

·           That the locations of the rock anchors are registered with Dial Before You Dig

·           That approval of all utility authorities likely to use the public road has been obtained. All temporary rock anchors are located outside the allocations for the various utilities as adopted by the Streets Opening Conference.

·           That any remaining de-stressed rock anchors are sufficiently isolated from the structure that they cannot damage the structure if pulled during future excavations or work in the public road.

·           That signs will be placed and maintained on the building stating that de-stressed rock anchors remain in the public road and include a contact number for the building manager.  The signs are to be at least 600mm x 450mm with lettering on the signs is to be no less than 75mm high.  The signs are to be at not more than 60m spacing.  At least one sign must be visible from all locations on the footpath outside the property.  The wording on the signs is to be submitted to Council’s Director Technical Services for approval before any signs are installed.

 

Permanent rock anchors are not to be used where any part of the anchor extends outside the development site into public areas or road reserves.

 

All works in the public road are to be carried out in accordance with the Conditions of Construction issued with any approval of works granted under Section 138 of the Roads Act 1993.

 

Reason:         To ensure the ongoing safety and protection of property.

 

75.   Structures to be clear of drainage easements

 

During all phases of demolition, excavation and construction, it is the full responsibility of the applicant and their contractors to:

 

·           ascertain the exact location of the Council drainage pipe traversing the site in the vicinity of the works

·           take full measures to protect the in-ground Council drainage system

·           ensure dedicated overland flow paths are satisfactorily maintained through the site

 

Drainage pipes can be damaged through applying excessive loading (such as construction machinery, material storage and the like). All proposed structures and construction activities are to be sited fully clear of Council drainage pipes, drainage easements, watercourses and trunk overland flow paths on the site. Trunk or dedicated overland flow paths must not be impeded or diverted by fill or structures unless otherwise approved. 

 

If a Council drainage pipeline is uncovered during construction, all work is to cease and the Principal Certifying Authority and Council must be contacted immediately for advice. Any damage caused to a Council drainage system must be immediately repaired in full as directed and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect existing Council infrastructure and maintain over land flow paths.

 

76.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

77.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing CoOrdinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au <http://www.sydneywater.com.au> then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the CoOrdinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

78.   Arborist’s report

 

All trees to be retained shall be inspected and monitored by an AQF Level 5 Arborist in accordance with AS4970-2009 and the amended Arboricultural Impact Assessment prepared by Advanced Treescape Consulting and dated 25/11/16, during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the project arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required during all works within the canopy spread of all existing trees on site and overhanging from adjoining sites, including date, brief description of the works inspected, and any mitigation works prescribed. 

 

All monitoring shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

·           All works as recommended by the project arborist are to be undertaken by an experienced arborist with a minimum AQF Level 3 qualification.

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

79.   Canopy/root pruning

 

Canopy and/or root pruning of the following tree/s shall be undertaken by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist, with a minimum qualification of the Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Tree works

Tree 1 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

Minor root pruning

Tree 2 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

Minor root pruning

Tree 3 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

Minor root pruning

Tree 4 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the front setback of the site

Minor root pruning

Tree 5 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located within the front setback of the site

Minor root pruning

Tree 6 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located within the front setback of the site

Minor root pruning

Tree 30 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located at the south-western corner of the site, within the adjoining property

Minor root pruning

Tree 37 – 40 / located along the south-western boundary

Minor root pruning

Tree 49 / Syzygium paniculatum (Brush Cherry)

located at the north-eastern corner of the site

Minor root and canopy pruning

Tree 50 / Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor laurel)

located at the north-east corner of the site

Minor root pruning

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

80.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are required to be severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced Arborist/Horticulturist with a minimum qualification of Horticulture Certificate or Tree Surgery Certificate.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 – Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

81.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation excluding for approved basement within the specified radius of the trunk(s) of the following tree(s) shall be hand dug:

 

Schedule

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

Tree 1 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

14.4m

Tree 2 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

10.2m

Tree 3 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the centre of the site

7.2m

Tree 4 / Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum)

located within the front setback of the site

8.4m

Tree 5 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located within the front setback of the site

3.6m

Tree 6 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located within the front setback of the site

5.0m

Tree 13-15, 18 and 19 / Cyathea cooperi (Scaly Treefern)

located on the eastern boundary of the riparian zone

2.0m

Tree 30 / Angophora floribunda (Rough barked Apple)

located at the south-western corner of the site, within the adjoining property

5.3m

Tree 37 – 40 / located along the south-western boundary

2.0m

Tree 49 / Syzygium paniculatum (Brush Cherry)

located at the north-eastern corner of the site

8.4m

Tree 50 / Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor laurel)

located at the north-east corner of the site

15.0m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

82.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

83.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

84.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:         To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

85.   Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:

 

·           ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry,

·           certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and

·           certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.

·           This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab.

·           No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.  This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

Reason:       To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.

 

86.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·           Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·           This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

87.   Amended vegetation management plan

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate the following works as outlined below as detailed within the Vegetation Management Plan, prepared by Keystone Ecological, dated 26 February 2016, are to be completed.

 

1.   All works detailed within the VMP pre-construction activities, plantings of compensatory canopy trees/shrubs/groundcovers, weed control, revegetation, maintenance and monitoring are to be carried out in accordance with the VMP.

 

2.   Planting to be undertaken within the Blue Gum High Forest within the site are to be species characteristic of Blue Gum High Forest in accordance with the Vegetation Management Plan. All trees/plant material to be planted is to be of local provenance sourced from parent material within Ku-ring-gai or Hornsby LGA’s.

 

3.   All fencing as detailed within the VMP is to be installed prior to works commencing.

 

4.   The area beneath the access driveway which crosses the riparian area is to be planted out with riparian species characteristic of Blue Gum High Forest under the direction of a qualified ecologist/bush regenerator. No monocultures are supported. A mixture of groundcovers including ferns, sedges, grasses, climbers, sprawlers and shrubs are to be planted.

 

5.   All noxious and environmental weeds are to be removed from the Blue Gum High Forest community within the site in accordance with the VMP.

 

6.   All vegetation management actions as specified in the VMP shall be carried out by suitably qualified and experienced bush regenerators. The minimum qualifications and experience required for the bush regeneration contractor are a TAFE Certificate 2 in Bushland Regeneration with two years demonstrated experience (for site supervisor) and a TAFE Certificate 2 in Bushland Regeneration with one year demonstrated experience (for other personnel). In addition, the site supervisor is to be eligible for full professional membership of the Australian Association of Bush Regenerators (AABR).

 

7.   VMP monitoring works are to be undertaken by an engaged bushland restoration contractors or a suitably qualified and experienced landscape architect, horticulturist, bush regenerator or ecologist. The rehabilitation actions identified in this VMP are to be monitored. Monitoring is to be undertaken throughout the entire contract period. Monitoring and maintenance works are to be undertaken for a minimum period of 5 years with 6 monthly reports are to be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Copied to Council’s Ecologist.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection and enhancement of Blue Gum High Forest within the site.

 

88.   Blue Gum High Forest management unit areas -Section 88b instrument

 

The Certifying Authority is to be provided with evidence of the creation of a restriction on the use of land under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the following Blue Gum High Forest management unit areas (2 & 3). The terms of restriction must state that any excavation, soil level changes or construction works are prohibited with the exception of works to be undertaken and outlined in accordance with the plan below.

 

Plan no.

Prepared by

Dated

Vegetation Management Plan (Ref: KMC 15-740)

Keystone Ecological

26 February 2016

 

Reason:         To ensure that Critically Endangered Blue Gum High Forest offset management areas are protected.

 

89.   Easement for waste collection

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that an easement for waste collection has been created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919.  The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council's draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council's Development Engineer.

 

Reason:         To permit legal access for Council, Council's contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.

 

90.   Installation of car stacking system

 

The car stacking system must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s standards and guidelines.

 

Reason:       Safety and amenity.

 

91.   Certification of car stacking system

 

A suitably qualified traffic or structural engineer must certify that the car stacking system is structurally sound and has been installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines.  The certification must also confirm that the device is operating satisfactorily.  The certificates are to be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:       Safety and amenity.

 

92.   Car stacking system positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate the applicant must create a Positive Covenant under Section 88 E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the car stacking system on the property.  Registered title documents showing the covenant must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:       Safety and amenity.

 

93.   Driveway construction

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that the section of driveway over the drainage easement has been constructed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate plans and is lightweight and readily removable to allow for future maintenance of the pipe. 

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

94.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 701686M_05 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

95.   Clotheslines and clothes dryers

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.

 

Reason:         To provide access to clothes drying facilities.

 

96.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:

 

1.         The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:

 

·        The Building Code of Australia

·        Australian Standard AS1668

·        Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable

 

2.         The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.

 

Note:    Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

97.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

98.   Accessibility

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

·           the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2

·           the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible

·           the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised

·           international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2

·           the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993

·           the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods

 

Reason:         Disabled access & services.

 

99.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

If internal re-use of rainwater is proposed, then prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Part 24R.8 of Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

100. Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·           the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·           the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of Ku-ring-gai Local Centres Development Control Plan have been achieved

·           retained water is connected and available for use

·           all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·           components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·           all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

Note:    Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

101. WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·           as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·           gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·           as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·           as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·           the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·           as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·           the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·           dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·           the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·           top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

102. OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Part 24R.8 of Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

103. CCTV report of pipe after work

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a closed circuit television inspection and report on the Council drainage pipeline traversing the site is to be undertaken by appropriate contractors and provided to Council’s Development Engineer.  The report is to include a copy of the footage of the inside of the pipeline.  Any damage that has occurred to the section of the pipeline since the commencement of construction on the site must be repaired in full to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

104. Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney Water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

105. Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·          the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans

 

·          the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking" in terms of minimum parking space dimensions

 

·          finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars

 

·          no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area

 

·          the vehicular headroom requirements of:

-        Australian Standard 2890.1 - “Off-street car parking”,

-        2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.

 

Note:    Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.

 

106.   Reinstatement of redundant crossings and completion of infrastructure

works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that he or she has received a signed inspection form from Council which states that the following works in the road reserve have been completed:

 

·           new concrete driveway crossing in accordance with levels and specifications issued by Council

·           removal of all redundant driveway crossings and kerb laybacks (or sections thereof) and reinstatement of these areas to footpath, turfed verge and upright kerb and gutter (reinstatement works to match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to integration of levels and materials)

·           full repair and resealing of any road surface damaged during construction

·           full replacement of damaged sections of grass verge to match existing

 

This inspection may not be carried out by the Private Certifier because restoration of Council property outside the boundary of the site is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

All works must be completed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The Occupation Certificate must not be issued until all damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council. Repair works shall be at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape.

 

107. Construction of works in public road - approved plans

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.

 

The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council.

 

The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings.  The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval.  All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued. 

 

Reason:         To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.

 

108. Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

109. Mechanical ventilation

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all mechanical ventilation systems are installed in accordance with Part F4.5 of the Building Code of Australia and comply with Australian Standards AS1668.2 and AS3666 Microbial Control of Air Handling and Water Systems of Building.

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.

 

110. Fire safety certificate

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.

 

Note:    A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

111. Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

112. No door restricting internal waste collection in basement

 

At all times, the basement garbage storage and collection area is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services. No doors, grilles, gates or other devices shall be provided in any location which would prevent this service. Where a gate, door or the like is to be erected, unimpeded access to the garbage collection point is to be provided by other means through written agreement with Council’s Waste Collection Services.

 

Reason:         To facilitate access to the garbage collection point.

 

113. Noise control – plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

114. Noise control - rainwater re-use system

 

All noise generating equipment, such as pumps, associated with any proposed rainwater re-use system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the pump/s outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:       To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

115. Car parking

 

At all times, the visitor car parking spaces are to be clearly identified and are to be for the exclusive use of visitors to the site. On site permanent car parking spaces are not to be used by those other than an occupant or tenant of the subject building. Any occupant, tenant, lessee or registered proprietor of the development site or part thereof shall not enter into an agreement to lease, license or transfer ownership of any car parking spaces to those other than an occupant, tenant or lessee of the building.

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate provision of visitor parking spaces.

 

116. Loading and unloading

 

At all times, all loading and unloading of service vehicles in connection with the use of the premises shall be carried out wholly within the site.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe traffic movement.

 

117. Unobstructed driveways and parking areas

 

At all times, all driveways and parking areas shall be unobstructed. Driveways and car spaces shall not be used for the manufacture, storage or display of goods, materials or any other equipment and shall be used solely for vehicular access and for the parking of vehicles associated with the use of the premises.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe traffic movement.

 

118. Department of Primary Industries - Water

 

Temporary dewatering of an amount above 3 ML may require a water licence to be obtained from DPI Water before construction commences.

 

The proposal must not incorporate provision for the permanent or semi-permanent pumping of groundwater seepage from below-ground areas. A fully tanked structure must be used.

 

Reason:       DPI Water requirements.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

148

Draft Revised Bush Fire Environmental Assessment Code and Draft Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2017

 

File: S06649

Vide: GB.5

 

 

To seek endorsement of the proposed contents of a Council submission to the NSW Rural Fire Service (RFS) on the draft Revised Bush Fire Environmental Assessment Code and supporting documents, and for Council to note that no submission is to be put forward by Council in regards to draft Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2017.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

A.   That Council endorses the submission as provided within Attachment A1, on the draft Bush Fire Environmental Assessment Code and supporting documents.

 

B.   That Council notes a submission in regards to the draft Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2017 will not be submitted.

 

C.   That Council undertakes a review of all relevant spatially identified land management agreements, for provision to the RFS and that conditions relating to these agreements be stored within an accessible location to enable provision of conditions within 3 working days.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

149

Revised Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2017-2018 - Post Exhibition

 

File: FY00382/9

Vide: GB.6

 

 

For Council to adopt the revised Delivery Program 2013 – 2017 and Operational Plan 2017 – 2018, incorporating the Budget, Capital Works Program, Statement of Revenue Policy and Fees and Charges for 2017 – 2018.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

A.      That Council adopts the revised Delivery Program 2013 - 2017 and Operational Plan 2017 -          2018, incorporating the Budget, Capital Works Program, Statement of Revenue Policy and   Fees and Charges for 2017 - 2018.

B.      That an ordinary rate in the dollar of $0.00064484 on the unimproved capital value of all rateable land categorised as residential in the Council area be made for the period of 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018.

C.       That an ordinary rate in the dollar of $0.00447545 on the unimproved capital value of all rateable land categorised as business in the Council area be made for the period of 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2018.

D.       That the minimum ordinary rate for both residential and business be set at $514.00 for the period 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018.

E.       That an infrastructure - primary rate in the dollar of $0.00029358 on the unimproved capital value of all rateable land categorised as residential or business in the Council area, with a $268 base amount be made for the period of 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018.

F.       That an infrastructure special rate in the dollar of $0.00003661 on the unimproved capital value of all rateable land categorised as residential or business in the Council area, with a $32 base amount be made for the period of 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018.

G.       That an environmental special rate in the dollar of $0.00006984 on the unimproved capital value of all rateable land categorised as residential or business in the Council area, with a zero base amount, be made for the period of 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018.

H.       That the voluntary pensioner rebate be granted to all eligible pensioners as a flat percentage of 8.5% of total rates and charges in 2017 - 2018.

I.    That Council writes to all residents and groups that made submissions in relation to the Revised 2013 - 2017 Delivery Program and draft Operational Plan 2017 - 2018 and respond to the authors with the outcomes.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


 

150

Public Roads within Major Projects Sites

 

File: S10973

Vide: GB.7

 

 

To seek Council approval to formally resolve the status of land within the Lindfield Village Green and the Lindfield Community Hub sites as public roads.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)

 

In relation to the Lindfield Community Hub:

 

A.   That Council proceed to compulsorily acquire Lots 1 & 2 DP1226294 for a future public road in accordance with Section 177 Roads Act 1993 and in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991.

B.   That Council make an application to the Minister and Governor for approval to acquire Lots 1 & 2 DP1226294 in accordance with Section 178/(2) Roads Act 1993 and in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991.

C.   That for the purposes of section 30 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991, the Council, as the owner of the land, agrees to the land being acquired for compensation in the amount of $1.00.

D.   That Council proceed to compulsorily acquire Lot 6 DP1226294, being a portion of Drovers Way, Lindfield, for the purpose of creating the Lindfield Community Hub, in accordance with Sections 186 and 187 of the Local Government Act 1993 and in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991.

E.   That Lot 6 DP1226294 is to be classified as Operational land.

F.   That Council make an application to the Minister and Governor for approval to acquire Lot 6 DP 1226294 in accordance with Sections 186 and 187 of the Local Government Act 1993 and in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991.

G.   That for the purposes of section 30 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991, the Council, as the owner of the road, agrees to the road being acquired for compensation in the amount of $1.00.

H.   That Council requests the Minister for Local Government approve a reduction in the notification period from 90 days to 30 days.

I.    That Council delegate to the General Manager or his delegate the power to do anything further as necessary to give effect to the compulsory acquisition including obtaining any necessary approvals and publishing any necessary notices in the Gazette

In accordance with Council’s resolution of 6 September 2016 in relation to the Lindfield Village Green:

J.   That Council proceed to compulsorily acquire Lot 21 DP 1223433 for a future public road in accordance with Section 177 Roads Act 1993 and in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991.

K.   That Council make an application to the Minister and Governor for approval to acquire Lot 21 DP 1223433 in accordance with Section 178/(2) Roads Act 1993 and in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991.

L.   That for the purposes of section 30 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991, the Council, as the owner of the land, agrees to the road being acquired for the compensation in the amount of $1.00.

M.  That Council requests the Minister for Local Government approve a reduction in the notification period from 90 days to 30 days.

N.  That Council proceed to compulsorily acquire Lot 23 DP1223433, being a portion of the unnamed lane, Lindfield, for the purpose of creating the Lindfield Village Green, in accordance with Sections 186 and 187 of the Local Government Act 1993 and in accordance with the Land Acquisition (Just Terms) Compensation Act 1991.

O.   That Lot 23 DP1223433 is to be classified as Operational land.

P.   That Council delegate to the General Manager or his delegate the power to do anything further as necessary to give effect to the compulsory acquisition including obtaining any necessary approvals and publishing any necessary notices in the Gazette.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Citer withdrew during discussion

 

 

151

259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield - Lindfield Library Site

 

File: S10468

Vide: GB.8

 

 

To seek the approval of Council to prepare and lodge a Development Application for redevelopment of the existing Lindfield Library Precinct at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

A.   That Council grants Landowner’s Consent for the lodgement of a Development Application for Council land at 259-271 Pacific Highway, Lindfield.

B.   That additional funding for this process shall come from the net income received from the rental of the residential units on the site and the proceeds from the sale of 9 Havilah Lane, Lindfield.

C.   That the General Manger be given delegation to grant Owner’s Consent for all necessary planning approval applications and associated documents.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Citer returned

 

 

152

Biodiversity Conservation Act and regulation and Vegetation SEPP

 

File: S11550

Vide: GB.10

 

 

To seek Council’s endorsement for two submissions to the NSW Government on the currently exhibited draft Regulations and other key products which support the Government’s new Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 and Local Land Services Amendment Act 2016.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

A.   That Council endorses the two submissions to the NSW government on the currently exhibited documents related to biodiversity and land management (Attachments A1 and A2).

 

B.   That Council authorises the Director Strategy and Environment to amend Council’s submission to improve clarity and strengthen arguments prior to its issue.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

153

NSW Department of Education and Ku-ring-gai Council Joint Use Project Proposals

 

File: S08640/3

Vide: GB.14

 

 

To advise Council of the status of discussions with the NSW Department of Education on the Joint Use Project Proposals for community use of school facilities at Ku-ring-gai High School and St Ives High School and to seek “in-principle” support for the Joint Use Project Proposals.

 

 

 

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Fornari-Orsmond)

 

That Council advise the NSW Department of Education of its “in-principle” support for the Joint Use Project Proposals subject to further negotiations on funding, size and scale of the projects and community consultation.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

154

Lindfield Learning Village Updated Heads of Agreement

 

File: S08640/3

Vide: GB.15

 

 

To advise Council on the status of planning and progression of the Heads of Agreement between Council and the NSW Department of Education on the joint use agreement for the Lindfield Learning Village.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Pettett)

 

That Council continue to negotiate with the NSW Department of Education on the capital and operational costs associated with public use of the facilities at the Lindfield Learning Village before finalising the Heads of Agreement.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

A Rescission Notice was lodged on this item at the end of the meeting and will be tabled at the next Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on 18 July 2017.

 

 

 

155

10 - 12 Newhaven Place, St Ives

 

File: S11074

Vide: NM.1

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Berlioz dated 19 June 2017

 

In April 2016 residents of Newhaven Place were consulted and advised by Council staff that Council was considering the divestment of the public path between Newhaven Place and Link Road to allow the amalgamation of two sites at 10 and 12 Newhaven Place to facilitate development by the owner of the two sites.  Residents were advised that the pathway would be relocated on the boundary of the amalgamated site. This created an expectation that Council would (a) retain a public pathway and that (b) the pathway would be relocated on the boundary of the site not integrated with the future development.

 

In May 2017 the developer of the site submitted a Letter of Offer to enter into a VPA that does not relocate the pathway as previously advised. This letter of offer was subject of GB5 at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 13 June 2017.

 

To complicate the matter there are three DAs currently lodged for the site, delivering two different development proposals with neither relocating the pathway as previously advised

 

For the sake of transparency and clarity, I move that all property owners of Newhaven Place and all those that made submissions in regard to relocation and divestment of the path be advised of:

 

1.   The status of the DAs for the site.

2.   The reasons for the inconsistency between the consultation and advice for relocation of the path.

3.   All options available for the divestment and/ or retention of the public pathway in its present location or relocated.

4.   At what step in the process of DAs, VPA and divestment of land will residents have an opportunity to make submissions.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Malicki)

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

156

Proposed aged care facility - 25, 25A, 27 Bushlands Avenue Gordon

 

File: DA0418/15

Vide: NM.2

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Malicki dated 19 June 2017

 

I move that Council makes a submission to the Northern Sydney Planning Panel objecting to the proposal for the Bushlands Ave Aged Care Facility.

 

The objection should use the grounds for refusal recommended by Development Control staff and issues raised by residents but not yet resolved as a basis for the submission.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Armstrong)

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


 

157

General Manager's Performance Review

 

File: CY00254/9

Vide: C.1

 

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in section 10A(2)(a), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(a) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than Councillors).

 

Report by Mayor Jennifer Anderson dated 19 June 2017

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/ Fornari-Orsmond)

 

A.   That Council recognises that overall the General Manager’s performance achieved a BETTER THAN SATISFACTORY result for the 2016/2017 performance cycle.

B.   That the Mayor write to the General Manager expressing the Councillors’ appreciation for his leadership and work in the past twelve months.

C.   That the General Manager be formally advised of the result of the Performance Review.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion

 

 

158

Planning Proposal - Deferred Area 15 - Killara Golf Club

 

File: S11324

Vide: GB.4

 

 

For Council to consider a Planning Proposal for the north-eastern part of the Killara Golf Club known as Deferred Area 15 under the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015.

 

The following member of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

R Read

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors McDonald/Szatow)

 

A.   That the Planning Proposal be amended in accordance with the recommendations in this Council Report and Table of Amendments at Attachment A1.

B.   That the Planning Proposal be forwarded to the Department of Planning and Environment for a Gateway Determination in accordance with section 56 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

C.   That delegation be given to the General Manager and Director of Strategy and Environment to verify all amendments are in accordance with the recommendations of this Council Report and Table of Amendments at Attachment A1prior to forwarding to the Department of Planning and Environment.

D.   That should a Gateway Determination be issued for public exhibition of the Planning Proposal, site specific amendments to Council’s Comprehensive Development Control Plan be prepared in accordance with  Council’s fees and charges, the details in this Council Report and the Table of Amendments at Attachment A1 and be placed on public exhibition concurrently with the Planning Proposal.

E.   That a Report be brought back to Council, as per any Gateway requirements, following the exhibition of the Planning Proposal and site specific draft Development Control Plan.

F.   That Council proceeds to make the Plan under delegated authority under Section 23 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

G.   That the applicant be notified of Council’s Resolution.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Ossip returned

 

 

159

Consideration of Submissions - Planning Proposal to amend the KLEP 2015 for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara

 

File: S11257

Vide: GB.9

 

 

For Council to consider the submissions received in response to the exhibition of the Planning Proposal to amend to the KLEP 2015 for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara.

 

The following member of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

S Greenwell

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/McDonald)

 

A.   That Council adopts the Planning Proposal for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara;

 

B.   That Councils proceeds to make the Plan, under delegated authority issued by the Department of Planning and Environment under Section 59(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979;

 

C.   That those who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors , McDonald, Malicki, Armstrong, Berlioz, Fornari-Orsmond and Ossip

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Citer, Pettett and Szatow

 

 

 

160

Theatre Facilities in Ku-ring-gai - Visioning and Feasibility Study

 

File: S10376-10

Vide: GB.11

 

 

This report sets out a process for Council to resolve its intention for the future use of the Marian Street Theatre site and theatre facilities in Ku-ring-gai generally.

 

The following member of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

J Townend

 

 

 

A Motion moved by Councillors Szatow and Citer
that voting on the following Item -
Theatre Facilities in Ku-ring-gai – Visioning and Feasibility Study
be in seriatum was CARRIED

 

For the Motion:             Councillors Armstrong, Szatow, Citer, Pettett, Malicki and Berlioz

Against the Motion:      The Mayor Councillor Anderson, Councillors Fornari-Orsmond, McDonald, and Ossip

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Szatow/Citer)

 

A.        Select the Marian Street site as the preferred option for the theatre in Ku-ring-gai.

 

For the Resolution:              Councillors Armstrong, McDonald, Ossip, Citer, Pettet, Szatow, Berlioz and Malicki

Against the Resolution:        The Mayor Councillor Anderson and Councillor Fornari-Orsmond

 

B.    Reaffirm support for the work of the Save Marian Street Theatre Committee.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

C.    Vote to grant $37,000 to the Save the Marian Street Theatre Committee for the cost of a feasibility study, which will gauge for the first time the strength of the financial commitment of the community to bring the Marian Street Theatre into the 21st century.

 

For the Resolution:              Councillors Armstrong, McDonald, Szatow, Citer, Pettett and Berlioz

 

Against the Resolution        The Mayor Councillor Anderson, Councillors Fornari-Orsmond, Ossip and Malicki

 

The above Motion was subject to a Foreshadowed Amendment and an Amendment which were LOST.

 

The LOST Foreshadow Amendment was:

 

(Moved: Councillors Malicki/Ossip)

 

A.    That Council select the Marian Street site as the preferred option for siting of theatre in Ku-ring-gai.

B.    That Council reaffirm support for the work of the Save Marian Street Theatre Committee.

C.    That Council undertakes a Visioning and Feasibility Study as a first step to resolving what facilities for theatre should be included at the Marian Street Theatre site and associated costs.

D.    That the Visioning and Feasibility Study be reported back to Council with a preferred option for endorsement by Council and as the basis for preparation of a detailed business case.

E.    That a confidential memorandum come to Councillors detailing the costs of a Visioning and Feasibility Study and a timeframe for reporting back to Council.

For the Foreshadow Amendment:           The Mayor Councillor Anderson, Councillors Fornari-Orsmond, Ossip and Malicki

Against the Foreshadow Amendment:    Councillors Armstrong, McDonald, Szatow, Citer, Pettett and Berlioz

The LOST Amendment was:

(Moved: Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/Ossip)

A.   That Council undertakes a Visioning and Feasibility Study as a first step to resolving its intention for the future use of the Marian Street Theatre site and theatre facilities in Ku-ring-gai.

B.   That the Visioning and Feasibility Study be reported back to Council with a preferred option for endorsement by Council and as the basis for preparation of a detailed business case.

For the Amendment:             The Mayor Councillor Anderson

Against the Amendment:       Councillors Armstrong, McDonald, Fornari-Orsmond, Ossip, Szatow, Citer, Pettett, Malicki and Berlioz

Councillors Fornari-Orsmond/Malicki moved a Procedural Motion asking the Mayor to seek a vote on the matter as there had been 2 speakers For and 2 speakers Against.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

Councillor Fornari-Orsmond withdrew during discussion

Councillor McDonald withdrew during discussion

Councillor McDonald returned

Councillor Fornari-Orsmond returned

Councillor Ossip withdrew during discussion

Councillor Ossip returned

 

 

161

Lindfield Community Hub - update

 

File: S10973-4

Vide: GB.12

 

 

The purpose of this report is to update Council on the development of the technical and design aspects of the master plan for the Lindfield Community Hub (the Project).

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

S McKenzie

T Benson

R Vowell

A Sweeney

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/McDonald)

 

A.      That Council adopts the following Table incorporating minor amendments to the Lindfield Community Hub Project mandatory requirements (as resolved by Council OMC of 6 October 2015, GB.10 and OMC 10 November 2015 GB.11):

 

LINDFIELD COMMUNITY HUB – PROJECT SCOPE/MANDATORY ELEMENTS

Category of works

Items of inclusion

Location and extent

Minimum requirements

Relevant guidelines and controls

General

Mix of residential, retail and commercial uses

_

_

- Council’s adopted master plan

Streetscape works

-New footpaths

-Underground power lines

-LED street lighting

-Street trees and tree grates

-Landscaping of verges

-Installation of street furniture such as benches, litter bins and bike racks, on strategic locations

Bent Lane

Bent Street

Woodford Lane Beaconsfield Parade

_

- Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Public Domain Plan, 2010

 

- Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan, 2010

 

- Council’s streetscape technical manual

 

Road and transport works

-Road realignment

 and resurfacing

-Kerb and gutter realignment

Bent Lane

Woodford Lane

_

- Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Public Domain Plan , 2010

 

- Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan, 2010

 

- Lindfield Local Centre Transport Network Model Study Report 2013-14

 

-Construction of new public street (realignment and extension of Drovers Way)

-Formal closure of existing Drovers Way road reserve

Between Bent Street and Beaconsfield Parade

_

- Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Public Domain Plan, 2010

 

- Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan, 2010

 

- Lindfield Local Centre Transport Network Model Study Report 2013-14

 

-Construction of new ‘Pick up / Drop off zone’

- Construction of taxi rank with shelters and signage

Woodford Lane

and Drovers Way

_

- Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan, 2010

 

 

-Relocate existing signalised pedestrian crossing on the Pacific Highway near the intersection with Tryon Place

Pacific Highway

– final location subject to RMS approval

- RMS technical requirements / guidelines.

 

- Install new signalised pedestrian signals on the Pacific Highway at a location approximately half way between the intersections of Balfour Street and Beaconsfield Parade

Pacific Highway

– final location subject to RMS approval

- RMS technical requirements / guidelines.

 

-Installation of new traffic signals

Intersection of Beaconsfield Parade and Pacific Highway

_

- Lindfield Local Centre Transport Network Model Study Report 2013-14

 

Public Domain Works

-Construction of new public park

 

Fronting Bent Street

 

- Minimum size of consolidated green open space 3,000m2

  with a minimum of 1/3 being deep soil area

 

- Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Public Domain Plan, 2010

 

- Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan, 2010

 

- Design specifications as provided by Council

 

-Construction of new urban plaza

 

The urban plaza is to directly adjoin the proposed park and be accessible from Woodford Lane

- Minimum size of 900sqm

- Design specifications as provided by Council

 

-Construction of new pedestrian plaza on Bent Street

Within road reserve between Bent Lane and Pacific Highway

 -

- Design specifications as provided by Council

Community building

- Construction of a three level community hub building as a ‘cold shell’ consistent with Council’s Technical Brief.

- Community building to comprise library facilities, community meeting rooms and halls, a child care centre and roof garden

Corner of Bent Street and new street (realigned Drovers Way)

- Minimum size 2,950m2

- High design quality

- Iconic

 

- Lindfield Community Facilities Study, Elton consulting, 2013

 

- Design specifications as provided by Council

 

-Branch library

Community hub building

- Minimum size 1,250 m2

- To be owned and operated by Council

 

 

- Lindfield Community Facilities Study, Elton consulting, 2013

 

- Design specifications as provided by Council

 

- Community centre

Community hub building

- Minimum size 1,200 m2

- To be owned and operated by Council

 

- Lindfield Community Facilities Study, Elton consulting, 2013

 

- Design specifications as provided by Council

 

- Childcare centre

Community hub building

- Minimum size 500m2 with external roof top garden area

- To be owned by Council and leased to a commercial child care operator

- Design specifications as provided by Council

 

- Council’s DCP

Car parking

-Council car parking for community uses

Basement car park and on street parking

- As per requirements of RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments - Parking Requirements for Retail (Shopping Centres) (to be treated as Office/Medical use)

- Australian Standards and Building Code of Australia

 

-Public parking (Commuter)

 

Basement car park

- Minimum of 140 spaces

-  delivery subject to TFNSW funding

- Specifications as provided by TFNSW

 

-Council car parking

Basement car park and on street parking

- Minimum of 112 spaces

- Australian Standards and Building Code of Australia

 

-Private parking  (retail and commercial)

Basement car park

- As per requirements of RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments - Parking Requirements for Retail (Shopping Centres)

- Australian Standards and Building Code of Australia

 

-Private parking (residential)

Basement car park

_

Local Centres DCP, 2012

 

Lindfield Community Hub - Site specific DCP

Retail & Commercial uses

-Supermarket

 

 

 

-Commercial & Retail (including supermarket)

 

 

Basement and ground level

Minimum supermarket size 3,000 m2

 

Maximum retail (including supermarket)  + commercial floor space 5,000m2

Local Centres DCP, 2012

 

Lindfield Community Hub - Site specific DCP

 

B.   That Council adopts the amendments made to the Adopted Lindfield Hub Masterplan – 1 June 2017 (Attachment A1).

 

With  the following changes:

 

-         That the Car Park revert back to the original proposal: “minimum of 112 spaces be retained in the basement carpark”

 

-         That Public Domain Works - the minimum size of green open space be 3,000 sqm with a minimum of 1/3 being deep soil area.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

162

St Ives Village Green Master Plan - Angle Parking Options

 

File: S07533

Vide: GB.13

 

 

To consider the various impacts and benefits of angle parking scenarios around the perimeter of the St Ives Village Green and Cowan Oval.

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

T Martire

M Thomas

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Berlioz/Ossip)

 

  1. That the matter be deferred until we are advised whether there are any legal obligations between Council and the St Ives Shopping Centre to provide parking on council land.

 

  1. That any consideration to amend parking spaces or times come back to Council once the DA which is currently being assessed by staff is determined.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 


 

 

The Meeting closed at 10.13 pm

 

 

The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 27 June 2017 (Pages 1 - 4) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 18 July 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

          __________________________                                 __________________________

                   General Manager                                                         Mayor / Chairperson

 

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

PT.1 / 72

 

 

Item PT.1

S11160

 

10 July 2017

 

 

Petition

 

 

Middle Harbour Heritage Conservation Area (Fifty Six [56] Signatures)

 

‘We, the undersigned, petition against the proposed Middle Harbour Road Conservation area for the following reasons:

·     The recommendation is based on erroneous and misleading information and mapping;

·     The area has no merit in being a Heritage Conservation Area; and

·     We request that the Council develop a set of reasonable standards to be inserted in Schedule 3 – Variations of the NSW State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008, to ensure that any new development is consistent with the current character of the area.’

 

Recommendation:

 

That the petition be received and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

PT.2 / 73

 

 

Item PT.2

88/06211/01

 

30 June 2017

 

 

Petition

 

 

Re-Seal Roadway - Southern end of Wellington Road/Ulmarra Place East Lindfield - [One Hundred and Seven (107) Signatures]

 

“We the undersigned would like to request that the Mayor of Ku-ring-gai Council look into the condition of the lower reaches of Wellington Road, East Lindfield from Carlyle Road to the Retirement Village, East Lindfield Gardens, administered by the Aveo Group.

 

We believe an earlier request for an inspection of the same has occurred.

 

The upper reaches of Wellington road was renewed after Ausgrid’s final work was completed. The residents were led to believe that ALL of Wellington Road and Ulmarra Place would be resurfaced.

 

We feel that since the storms and rains during March 2017, the road has significantly deteriorated and subsidence of the middle part of the road has increased. The nature of this stretch of road has tight bends, parked cars and is frequently used by trucks and buses, and especially emergency vehicles, therefore rending it a risk to the elderly residents of the Village because avoiding the subsidence is extremely difficult. This repair job has been outstanding for some considerable time.

 

As a group we realise that Council has its schedules and priorities. We request that the road be totally renewed and the matter given prompt attention.”

 

Recommendation:

 

That the petition be received, and referred to the appropriate Officer of Council for attention.

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.1 / 74

 

 

Item GB.1

S11243

 

4 July 2017

 

 

Draft Destination Management Plan

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To present the revised draft Ku-ring-gai Destination Management Plan to Council following the statutory public exhibition period.

 

 

background:

Council engaged Wray Sustainable Tourism Research and Planning to develop a Destination Management Plan (DMP) for Council in 2016.

The draft Ku-ring-gai Destination Management Plan 2017-2020 was considered at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 4 April 2017, and was placed on public exhibition from 15 April to 29 May 2017.

 

 

comments:

The draft DMP identified nature-based tourism, aboriginal heritage and major events as the three principle components for visitation in Ku-ring-gai. Other forms of less significant tourism were identified as architectural heritage, and cultural and recreational experiences.

Council received 27 written submissions during the exhibition period. Comments from the community included matters relating to the St Ives Precinct user groups, the natural environment, built heritage and cultural facilities. The consultant has subsequently made appropriate amendments to the draft DMP to incorporate community feedback.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council adopt the revised draft Ku-ring-gai Tourism Destination Management Plan 2017-2020.

 

 

 


Purpose of Report

To present the revised draft Ku-ring-gai Destination Management Plan to Council following the statutory public exhibition period.

 

Background

Council engaged Dr Meredith Wray from Wray Sustainable Tourism Research and Planning, in association with Stephen Bargwanna (SGB Advisory), to develop a Destination Management Plan (DMP).

 

The draft DMP, produced during the period November 2016 to March 2017, identified nature-based tourism, aboriginal heritage and major events as the three principle components for visitation and tourism in Ku-ring-gai. Other forms of less significant tourism were identified as architectural heritage, and cultural and recreational experiences.

 

Council considered the draft DMP at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 4 April 2017, and the draft plan was placed on public exhibition for 28 days, during which 27 submissions were received (12 short comments via Council’s web page and 15 comments via email).

 

The consultant has now made appropriate amendments to the draft DMP in response to community comments, and a revised draft DMP is attached (Attachment A1) along with submissions from the community (Attachment A2).

 

Comments

The draft DMP was developed to provide strategic direction for Council in the development, management, and marketing of tourism and events over the next four years. Particular emphasis in the draft DMP has been placed on sustainable tourism, as it was considered that tourism and major events in Ku-ring-gai should be developed and managed to best address and reflect environmental constraints, along with community expectations.

 

Sustainable tourism therefore is a primary consideration in the draft DMP in the planning for tourism and events in Ku-ring-gai.

 

In developing the draft DMP emphasis was also placed on tourism that celebrates and protects Ku-ring-gai’s distinctive natural and built environments. Another strong aspect of the draft DMP is that tourism and/or events in Ku-ring-gai provide maximum benefits to the local community.

 

The draft DMP has identified the following three principle components for visitation and tourism in Ku-ring-gai:

 

·     Nature-based tourism

·     Aboriginal heritage

·     Major events with a particular emphasis on the St Ives Precinct as a gateway for such activities.

 

Other forms of tourism identified, although of lesser significance are:

·     Architectural heritage 

·     Cultural and recreational experiences

 

Outcomes from the Public Exhibition process

 

The draft DMP was placed on exhibition from 15 April to 29 May 2017. The techniques used for community engagement and communication were:

 

·     emails to those involved in the phase 1 engagement sessions

·     media releases

·     newspaper advertisements

·     Council’s  website

 

The key subjects expressed in the submissions were generally based around the following categories:

 

1.   St Ives Precinct

 

a.   matters related to existing users of facilities 

b.   matters directly related to horse riding and equestrian activities

 

2.   The natural environment

 

a.   impact on native vegetation

b.   promoting Ku-ring-gai’s natural environment

c.   creating some of Sydney’s most ecologically significant walking trails

 

3.  Built heritage and cultural facilities

 

a.   ensuring heritage values are restored and protected

b.   promoting Ku-ring-gai’s built heritage

c.   Marian Street theatre

 

A number of submissions contained elements from some or all of the above categories. Other issues raised, that did not fit into the major categories, included concerns that were essentially beyond the scope of the draft DMP, or particular matters that would be addressed through additional planning or the DA process at later stages. These included:

 

·     traffic movement at the St Ives Precinct and in Ku-ring-gai in general

·     water supply at the St Ives Showground

·     suggestion to use a ’Trust’ model for the management of the St Ives Precinct

·     the effects of eco accommodation and higher use damaging walking trails

·     development of the railway precincts

·     re-opening the Marian Street Theatre

·     establishing an art gallery

 

The following amendments have been made to the draft DMP in response to the community feedback:

 

Amendment number and corresponding page in draft DMP

Changes made

In response to

1.   Page 4.

 

Insert a map of the Ku-ring-gai LGA and new wording: Ku-ring-gai is a nationally significant ‘ecological heart’ within the Sydney metropolitan area that is bounded by three National Parks (Ku-ring-gai Chase, Garigal and Lane Cove ), 38 conservation areas and more than 150 bushland reserves covering 1150 hectares with a high variety of native fauna and flora.

Internal feedback regarding layout of the plan

2.   Page 15, last paragraph 2nd column

 

Inserted text at the end of the last paragraph, 2nd column:

Future master planning for the site should also ensure that new tourism initiatives for the site integrate with current community and recreational / sporting activities to develop an integrated multi-purpose destination.

Comments from existing users of the St Ives Showground, including the Northside Riding Club (approx. 13 submissions)

3.   Page 16, 2nd paragraph

Change to sentence:

The heritage story of the Showgrounds should be retained and shared together with its iconic buildings, structures, equipment, current activities and past agricultural uses.

4.   Page 17 in final  paragraph above Best Practice Example

 

Inserted text above Best Practice example:

It is proposed that all new development in the St Ives Precinct will be sensitively designed, constructed and operated in accordance with best practice including protection of Duffy’s Forest and other endangered ecological communities and there should be a net improvement to environmental performance etc.

Community Feedback

5.   Page 18  - additional bullet points in text box headed ‘The situational analysis and stakeholder engagement process undertaken to inform this Plan confirmed opportunities to:

Additional bullets inserted:

·     Promote equestrian facilities and events and other community and family friendly activities at the site including the proposed regional playground and Ecoline attraction, remote control planes, drones and cars, dog walking and training, athletics, soccer and other sporting activities in line with community needs.

·     Establish and promote short horse-trekking experiences through Ku-ring-gai and the northern beaches.

 

6.   Page 26 –  new text

 

 

Additional bullet point inserted:

·     Work collaboratively with heritage and environmental groups to promote, restore and celebrate Ku-ring-gai heritage values.

Community feedback in response to submissions from individuals and groups focussing on the promotion and preservation of cultural and heritage facilities and features existing in Ku-ring-gai, including Marian Street Theatre and Hillview (approx. 10 submissions)

7.   Page 27 – change Action 4

Action 4 now reads:

Work cooperatively with Sydney Living Museums, local heritage stakeholder groups and operators to establish a strategic and coordinated approach to development of year round heritage and cultural experiences including heritage walks in Ku-ring-gai.

8.   Page 44 and 46  - maps clarified and inserted

 

 

A map of the St Ives Precinct has been included (page 46) to clearly outline the boundaries of the St Ives Precinct consistent with Council’s adopted Plan of Management for the St Ives Precinct 2015.

Internal feedback

 

An adopted DMP that is embedded in Council policy will ensure strategic priorities and associated actions can be implemented over the next four years. An adopted DMP will:

 

·     Guide the work of Council staff to implement the plan’s initiatives to grow the local visitor economy through tourism and events

·     Enable commencement of work on identifying and securing relevant grants to support the implementation of recommended strategies and actions within the plan

·      Be used as a key strategic document to engage with tourism stakeholders to communicate Council's vision and plans to grow the local visitor economy and harness their support for the implementation of the plan's strategies and priorities (e.g. State Government MPs, NSW Government departments and agencies, including Destination NSW, National Parks and Wildlife Services)

 

integrated planning and reporting

Local Economy and Employment

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

E3.1.1. Tourism business has been strengthened and expanded.

 

Work with partners to develop a tourism and visitation strategy for Ku-ring-gai.

 

Finalise and commence key actions identified in the tourism and visitation strategy for the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area. Develop strategies and actions that support increasing overnight stays in Ku-ring-gai as identified in the NSW Visitor Economy Industry Action Plan and Ku-ring-gai Visitation Strategy.

 

Places Spaces and Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P5.1.3.Local aboriginal and cultural history is recognised and promoted.

Local aboriginal history is recognised and promoted.

Support aboriginal cultural activities at the St Ives Precinct.

 

Community

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

C2.1.1.Ku-ring-gai’s rich cultural diversity and creativity is celebrated through programs and events,

A program of cultural events is developed to celebrate our diversity.

Continue to develop and attract major regional events for the St Ives Precinct (St Ives Showground and Wildflower Garden)

 

Governance Matters

The draft DMP was considered by Council and placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days. This report now advises Council of the comments from the public exhibition period and subsequent amendments to the draft DMP based on community feedback.

 

Risk Management

There are no direct risk management matters associated with this particular report. Any risk management matters associated with tourism and events have been considered in the development of the draft DMP, and planning for specific events would include associated Risk Management Plans.

 

Financial Considerations

There are no direct financial considerations associated with adopting the draft DMP. Any recommendations from the revised DMP that have financial implications, have, where possible, already been factored into the draft 2017/2018 budget (e.g. The Medieval Faire).

 

Social Considerations

There are no direct social considerations associated with the writing of this report. Social matters associated with sustainable tourism and events have been considered within the revised DMP.

 

Environmental Considerations

There are no environmental issues associated with the writing of this report. Environmental matters associated with sustainable tourism and events have been considered within the revised DMP.

 

Community Consultation

Throughout the development of the draft DMP a number of methods were used to engage the community, these included:

 

·     Specialist workshops  

·     Individual consultations

·     On-line comments and responses

 

Over 100 people, representing tourism and business, community groups, and other specialist disciplines including heritage, arts, culture, sport and recreation, were engaged through one, or a combination of the above consultation opportunities.

 

Following the exhibition period an additional 27 submissions from the community had been received. The broad categories addressed in the submissions were the St Ives Precinct, the natural environment and built heritage and cultural facilities.

 

Internal Consultation

A steering committee was established to oversee the development of the draft DMP. Membership of the steering committee consisted of staff from Community, Strategy and Environment and Operations departments.

 

The steering committee participated in the workshops and was briefed at milestones throughout the development of the draft DMP. A briefing session was also conducted for Councillors and senior staff as the draft DMP was being developed.

 

Summary

The draft Destination Management Plan 2017-2020 was developed to provide strategic direction for Council in the development, management, and marketing of tourism and events over the next four years.

Sustainable tourism is a primary consideration in the draft DMP in the planning for tourism and events in Ku-ring-gai.

 

In developing the draft DMP, emphasis was placed on tourism that celebrates and protects Ku-ring-gai’s distinctive natural and built environments. Another strong aspect of the draft DMP is that tourism and/or events in Ku-ring-gai should provide maximum benefits to the local community.

 

The draft DMP has identified three principle components for tourism in Ku-ring-gai. These are, nature-based tourism, aboriginal heritage and major events, with a particular emphasis on the
St Ives Precinct as a gateway for such activities. Other forms of tourism identified, although of less significance, were architectural heritage and cultural and recreational experiences.

 

The draft DMP has been on public exhibition and Council has received 27 written submissions.

 

The key subject categories expressed in the submissions were based around the St Ives Precinct, the natural environment and built heritage and cultural facilities, and appropriate amendments have now been made to the draft DMP to best reflect community feedback.

 

This report recommends that the revised draft DMP be adopted by Council and its recommendations be implemented to the extent possible within available Council resources.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council adopt the draft revised Ku-ring-gai Destination Management Plan 2017-2020.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Les Currie

Team Leader - Tourism and Visitation St.Ives Precinct

 

 

 

 

Mark Taylor

Manager Community & Recreation Services

 

 

 

 

Janice Bevan

Director Community

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Ku-ring-gai Destination Management Plan 2017 to 2020 Final Version 29 June 2017

 

2017/177919

 

A2

Destination Management Plan Community Submissions - Attachment A2 Council report

 

2017/186463

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.2 / 82

 

 

Item GB.2

S05273

 

7 July 2017

 

 

Investment Report as at 30 June 2017

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for June 2017.

 

 

background:

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

 

comments:

The net return on investments for the financial year ended June 2017 was $4,503,000 against an annual revised budget of $4,081,000 giving an annual favourable variance of $422,000.

 

 

recommendation:

That the summary of investments performance for June 2017 be received and noted; and that the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and report adopted. 

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for June 2017.

 

Background

 

Council’s investments are reported monthly to Council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993, the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Comments

 

Investment Portfolio Performance Snapshot

 

The table below provides the investments portfolio performance against targets identified in Council’s Investment Policy as well as other key performance indicators based on industry benchmarks.

 

 

Cumulative Investment Returns against Revised Budget

 

The net return on investments for the financial year ended June 2017 was $4,503,000 against an annual revised budget of $4,081,000 giving an annual favourable variance of $422,000. The investment portfolio performed strongly due to an increased investment portfolio size during the financial year and better than expected returns.

 

 

The total return on investments for the month of June is provided below.

 

 

A comparison of the cumulative investment returns against year to date revised budget is shown in the Chart below.

 

 

Cash Flow and Investment Movements

 

Council’s total cash and investment portfolio at the end of June 2017 was $144,280,000, compared to $145,058,000 at the end of May 2017, a net cash outflow of $778,000. The cash outflow was mainly due to end of financial year creditor payments.

 

Eight investments matured and seven new investments were made during the month of June.

 

 

Investment Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

Overall during the month of June the investment performance was well above the industry benchmark.

 

The benchmark is specific to the type of investment and the details are provided below.

 

·      AusBond Bank Bill Index is used for all Council’s investments

 

Table 1 - Investments Performance against Industry Benchmarks

 

 

Table 2 below provides a summary of all investments by type and performance during the month.

Attachment A1 provides definitions in relation to different types of investments.

 

Table 2 - Investments Portfolio Summary during June 2017

 

   

 

Investment by Credit rating and Maturity Profile

 

The allocation of Council’s investments by credit rating and the maturity profile are shown below:

 

 

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Leadership & Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial

resources and assets to maximise delivery of

services

Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance

Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council

 

Governance Matters

 

Council’s investments are made in accordance with the Local Government Act (1993), the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Section 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 states:

 

(1)      The responsible accounting officer of a council:

 

(a)      must provide the council with a written report (setting out details of all money that the council has invested under section 625 of the Act) to be presented:

 

(i)      if only one ordinary meeting of the council is held in a month, at that meeting, or

 

(ii)     if more than one such meeting is held in a month, at whichever of those meetings the council by resolution determines, and

(b)      must include in the report a certificate as to whether or not the investment has been made in accordance with the Act, the regulations and the council’s investment policies.

 

(2)      The report must be made up to the last day of the month immediately preceding the meeting.

 

Risk Management

 

Council manages the risk associated with investments by diversifying the types of investment, credit quality, counterparty exposure and term to maturity profile.

 

Council invests its funds in accordance with The Ministerial Investment Order.

 

All investments are made with consideration of advice from Council’s appointed investment advisor, CPG Research & Advisory.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The revised budget for interest on investments for the financial year 2016/2017 is $4,081,000. Of this amount approximately $2,454,000 is restricted for the benefit of future expenditure relating to development contributions, $555,900 transferred to the internally restricted Infrastructure & Facility Reserve, and the remainder of $1,071,100 is available for operations.

 

Social Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Not applicable.

 

Community Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

 

None undertaken or required.

 

Certification - Responsible Accounting Officer

 

I hereby certify that the investments listed in the attached report have been made in accordance with Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993, clause 212 of the Local Government General Regulation 2005 and Council’s Investment Policy.

 

Summary

 

As at 30 June 2017:

 

 

·     Council’s total cash and investment portfolio is $144,280,000.

 

·     The net return on investments for the financial year to June 2017 was $4,503,000 against an annual revised budget of $4,081,000, giving an annual favourable variance of $422,000.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.       That the summary of investments and performance for June 2017 be received and noted.

 

B.       That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

 

 

 

Tony Ly

Financial Accounting Officer

 

 

Angela Apostol

Manager Finance

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Investments definitions specific to Council’s investment portfolio

 

2016/124274

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.3 / 90

 

 

Item GB.3

CY00070/9

 

29 June 2017

 

 

497 - 507 Pacific Highway Killara, Fire Saftey Concern referred by Fire & Rescue NSW.

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To report to Council the findings of an inspection by Fire & Rescue New South Wales of a residential unit development, at 497 – 507 Pacific Highway, Killara which revealed fire protection measures were not being adequately serviced and maintained for the protection of the building’s occupants. To seek Council’s endorsement to serve appropriate orders.

 

 

background:

In accordance with Section 121ZD (2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act,1979 (the Act) a local Council must consider any report referred to it by the Commissioner of NSW Fire Brigade and determine if it will proceed to exercise its powers to issue an order under Section 121B of the Act.

 

 

comments:

A report from Fire & Rescue NSW (F&RNSW), dated 15 May 2017, reported that an inspection of the subject building on 14 March 2017, following F&RNSW receipt of a resident’s concern, identified significant fire safety matters. Two matters have since been rectified, however a number of others remain outstanding. Fire & Rescue NSW requests Council’s assistance in bringing the subject building into full compliance with the Act in regard to fire safety. 

 

 

recommendation:

That Council, as the regulatory authority, exercise its powers under Section121B of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979 to serve Orders 6a & 6b on the owners of Strata Plan SP 86801, located at 497–507 Pacific Highway, Killara, so as to ensure the safety of the occupants of the building and integrity of the structure.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To report to Council the findings of an inspection by Fire & Rescue New South Wales of a residential unit development, at 497 – 507 Pacific Highway, Killara which revealed fire protection measures were not being adequately serviced and maintained for the protection of the building’s occupants. To seek Council’s endorsement to serve appropriate orders.

 

Background

Fire and Rescue New South Wales (F&RNSW) received correspondence on 4 March 2017 in relation to the alleged inadequacy of fire safety measures within and about the subject premises.  On 14 March 2017, officers of F&R NSW undertook an inspection of the building and noted three significant items of concern. The items identified included defective sprinkler operation, masked smoke detectors and disconnection of a pressure switch on the alarm panel board that automatically signals the Fire Brigade Monitoring Centre, should an event occur.

Two emergency orders were issued by Fire and Rescue NSW, requiring restoration of the sprinkler system, removal of dust caps that were masking the operation of the smoke and heat detectors and connection of the pressure switch to the alarm signalling equipment. A re-inspection of the premises on 7 April 2017 found those matters to be compliant.

Fire and Rescue NSW contacted Council’s Fire Safety Co-ordinator and a joint inspection of the premises was carried out on 2 May 2017 so as to determine if any other matters were of concern.  The joint inspection identified a number of other items that required attention, they included untagged fire doors, poor evacuation routes, defective fire shutters, unprotected service penetrations,

Section 121ZD of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 requires that the Commissioner of New South Wales Fire Brigade supply Council the results of any inspection carried out in the council area. The Act then requires the report to be tabled at a meeting of Council so that Council may determine whether or not to issue an Order under 121(B) (6) of the Act.  Order 6 requires the implementation of measures to suppress fire, prevent the spread of fire and to provide fire safety for building occupants. Council must then inform the Commissioner of New South Wales Fire Brigade of its determination.

 

The joint inspection of the 2nd May 2017 revealed:

 

1.       The sprinkler system installed is a split system having two separate valves controlling the flow of water to different parts of the development.  Alarm valve singling equipment was found not wired to the building’s fire indicator panel’s fire monitoring/alarm system. 

 

On the activation of a sprinkler head and without the system connected to a monitored alarm, Fire & Rescue New South Wales will not receive the alarm to attend the building.  This does not comply with both AS1670 and AS2118.

 

The fire indicator panel was examined and the addressing of the sprinkler installations was found not to correspond with that indicated on the sprinkler alarm valves.

 

2.       The block plan required to be co-located with the sprinkler control panel, detailing the layout of the sprinkler system within the building was inadequate. The block plan did not sufficiently demonstrate which valve supplied the flow of water to which area of sprinklers nor did it identify the separate sprinklers of the sprinkler system.  This does not comply with AS2118.

 

3.       The installed diesel pump required to boost water pressure so as to operate the on-site fire hydrants and sprinkler system was found not to be wired to the fire indicator panel.  This does not comply with AS1670, AS2118 and AS2419.

 

4.       The diesel pump for the hydrant and sprinkler system requires dieseline to power the pump and whilst there was a fuel drum on site, there was insufficient fuel to top up the fuel tank of the pump.  This does not comply with AS2118 and AS2419.

 

5.       The door providing access to the sprinkler pump room is required to be a self-closing fire door.  The door assembly of door and frame are required by AS1905.1 to have compliance tags attached.  Evidence of tags being on the door assembly was apparent but they had been removed. 

 

The fire door has a vent installed and while it is possible from a prototype tested door to install a louvered vent, the vent is required to be of a type that has an intumescent fire damper installed inside the vent.  Examining the vent found no intumescent damper installed. The door therefore does not comply with AS1905.1.

 

6.       The sprinkler pump room has a floor waste to collect spillages. Examination of the floor stains reveals recent spillages to have been dieseline.  The floor waste within the pump room is believed to be connected to the building’s stormwater system.  The room has no bunding to contain spillages and no absorbent materials to soak up any diesel fuel spill that may result.  This is a breach of Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.

 

The sprinkler pump room is required to be a fire-isolated compartment protected from other areas of the building.  The walls the floor and the floor over the pump room are required to have a fire resistance level of at least 120/120/120.  The pump room is required to withstand a fire for two hours without structural failure.

 

The floor waste penetrations are required to be protected in accordance with Clause C3.15 of the BCA.  Fire collars required to seal floor wastes are supplied in different levels of fire resistance. Further investigation as to adequacy of collars installed is required.  If it is not possible to identify the fire resistance of collars installed, those penetrations may need to be retrofitted with fire collars of a fire resistance level of not less than -/120/- .

 

7.       The required exit door from the visitor parking area was found key locked and to open against the direction of egress, contrary to that required by Clause D2.21 of the BCA and Clauses 185 & 186 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.  An operational sign relating to fire exit offences was found fixed to the wall adjacent to the door but at an inappropriate height, this is contrary to Clause 183 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, which requires the sign to be conspicuously positioned adjacent to a doorway.

 

8.       The fire-isolated stairs ascending from the visitors’ and residents’ carparks and descending from the residential floor above are required to open outwardly to open space but instead open within a glass covered enclosure.  A further door had to be opened to egress to the open space.  The glass enclosure was not shown in the approved details and therefore is unauthorised.

 

An awning window from the ground floor level common corridor also opens into the glass covered enclosure.  The awning window is opened and is held open by a chain driven winder. 

 

Due to the window in close proximity to the path of egress the window is required to be protected. 

 

A fusible release fire rated shutter is installed over the window but due the awning window being held open on the chain of the winder, the window will not close and would on release of the fire shutter jamb the shutter open.  In the event of a fire, this would result in the enclosed space becoming smoke logged, trapping the building occupants in fire-isolated stairs.

 

Both exit doors from the carpark and descending fire isolated stairs were found tagged to comply with the Standard Fire Door Code AS1905.1.  Both fire door assemblies comprising fire door panel and metal door jamb were found not to have been installed correctly.  The metal door frames designed and manufactured to be held back in place using masonry fixings were found installed without the required fixings. 

 

9.       As the building is  “U” shaped in plan, each wing is a mirror image of the other, to the effect that items listed in matters 7 and 8 above is duplicated within the development.

 

10.     The Pacific Highway verge is the nearest and nominated available safe public place for occupants in the event of an emergency. The path of travel to this safe place is currently blocked by two high steel gates, both of which are padlocked. Further, the travel path is not clearly marked and is compromised due to overgrown vegetation.  This is contrary to clause D1.10 of the BCA.

 

11.     Numerous ground floor windows open into a common quadrangle/courtyard, which is between the two wings of the residential unit development.  The windows are all awning type, and when in the open position and are held open by chain driven winders.  As the windows face into the path egress, the path of egress requires protection and to achieve this, fusible release fire rated shutters have been installed.  The fire shutters have been tagged in accordance with AS1905.2 and provide a fire resistance level of -/240/-minutes. 

 

However, as mentioned above, the windows being of an awning type and opening outwardly would in a fire, jamb a closing shutter open providing no protection to evacuees, who have no safe place to go, due to locked gates.

 

12.     Numerous unprotected penetrations were found throughout the building requiring fire stopping collars or other methods of construction to be carried out to satisfy Clauses C3.12 and C3.15 and Specification C3.15 of the Building Code of Australia.

 

13.     The fire doors to the garbage room and to store rooms in the basement levels are being jambed open and have been damaged or have been removed and while not deemed to be required, nevertheless the doors were installed to contain the risk of a fire spreading to other parts of the building and therefore need to be repair or replaced. 

 

14.     Building fire attack hydrants are required to have Storz couplings fitted that comply with AS2419.1 AS2419.2 and AS2419.3.  Approved couplings are forged aluminium.  Inferior cast aluminium Storz couplings were found.  Under operating pressure, cast aluminium Storz couplings fail.  The consequence of a coupling failing puts members of Fire & Rescue New South Wales at an elevated risk, as officers would no longer have a water supply available to fight a fire. 

 

15.     The fire brigade booster valves located at the street boundary were found without anti-tampering devices.  AS2419 requires anti-tampering devices to be fitted.  Aluminium Storz couplings fitted to the hydrants were the non-approved inferior cast aluminium type of coupling.  A compliance tag attached to the booster indicated irregular inspections.  The booster was inspected January 2014, January 2015 and June 2016. 

 

Part 4 of AS1851 requires hydrants to be inspected and maintained on a 6 monthly basis, this includes running the diesel hydrant sprinkler booster pump so to depressurise the system and to check the most disadvantaged hydrant and sprinkler head in the system. 

 

As only irregular inspections have been conducted and without evidence to the contrary, it is believed that the system is not being maintained as required.

 

16.     The building was issued with a Final Occupation Certificate in May 2012, and the Certifier obtained and submitted a Final Fire Safety Certificate for the fire safety measures installed.

 

A recent examination of the Final Fire Safety Certificate revealed it did not include certification of:

 

·      lift landing doors.

·      window fire shutters

·      basement carpark mechanical exhaust ventilation system

·      lightweight construction

 

However, it did include a reference to:

·      an alternative solution using a non-compliant AS2118 sprinkler system, in lieu of an incipient fire rated ceilings (details of the alternative solution are not known)

 

17.     The Annual Fire Safety Statements that have been submitted to date ,have omitted to include the measures not included in the Final Fire Safety Certificate and have made no commentary on the alternative solution reference, being a non-compliant AS2118 sprinkler system.

 

Comments

 

This building is relatively new, having received its final Occupation Certificate in May 2012.  The Occupation Certificate included a Final Fire Safety Certificate, testifying the installed fire safety measures had been commissioned in compliance with relevant standards existing at the time when each measure was installed.

 

A Fire Safety Certificate is used to establish a Building Fire Safety Schedule and is the basis for the Annual Fire Safety Statement, to be submitted to Council and Fire & Rescue New South Wales. These statements certify each fire safety measure installed within the building as being fit for purpose.

 

Concern is now raised as to the legitimacy of the certificates and statements that have been provided to Council to date. For this reason, it is proposed not only to order the building owners to attend to the defective fire safety measures but also to engage a suitably accredited and independent Fire Safety Engineer to submit a Fire Safety Audit Report into a review of occupant building fire safety and to make, if necessary, recommendations for improving fire safety for the building occupants.

 

Governance Matters

 

Section 121ZD of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 requires the Commissioner of New South Wales Fire Brigade to supply Council the results of any inspection carried out in the Council area. The Act, then requires the report to be tabled at a meeting of Council, so that Council may determine whether or not to issue an Order under 121(B) (6) of the Act. 

Order 6 requires the implementation of measures to suppress fire, prevent the spread of fire and to provide fire safety for building occupants. Council must then inform the Commissioner of New South Wales Fire Brigade of its determination.

 

Risk Management

 

Council manages risks by identification, assessment and implementation of control measures of reasonably foreseeable hazards.

 

Council has been placed on notice by Fire and Rescue New South Wales that the subject premises has less than satisfactory fire safety and fire suppression measures.

 

The decision to issue orders on the owners of Strata Plan 86801 will alert them of a risk to all occupants and the building in the event of a fire and of the need to improve fire safety.

 

Financial Considerations

 

There are no financial implications for Council should it determine to issue orders on the building owners, however, a financial burden will be placed upon the owners of the building to bring about compliance.

 

Social Considerations

 

There are no specific social considerations associated with this report

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental considerations associated with this report.

 

Community Consultation

 

No community consultation has occurred in the preparation of this report. Should Council resolve to issue orders on the owners of the subject premises, the order process makes statutory allowance for the owner to make submissions to Council in respect of the works and timeframes proposed.

 

Summary

 

Fire and Rescue New South Wales on receiving a complaint from a resident inspected the building and found cause to serve an emergency order to reconnect the building’s sprinkler system.  Fire and Rescue NSW then advised Council and a joint inspection by Fire Brigade and Council of the premises revealed additional issues of fire safety.  The issues found were of significant concern such that would compromise the safety of the residents and the structural integrity of the building.

 

It is recommended that Council serve orders on the owners of the building to rectify the building’s fire safety issues.

 

 

Recommendation:

1.   THAT Council, as the regulatory authority, exercise its powers under Section 121(B) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (EPA&A 1979) to serve Orders 6a and 6b on the owners of Strata Plan SP 86801, located at 497 – 507 Pacific Highway, Killara, so as to ensure the safety of the occupants of the building and integrity of the structure.

 

2.   THAT Council, in accordance with powers of Section 121(B) 6a of the EP&AA 1979, order the owners of the building to engage a suitably accredited fire safety engineer (C10 BPB), to undertake a full fire safety audit of the building.  The audit is to be in accordance with the guideline listed in Australian Standard 4655:2005 and  Parts C, D, and E of the Building Code of Australia;

 

Should any alternative solution/s to the performance requirements of the Building Code of Australia be found necessary , the alternative solution must be peer reviewed by a separate qualified person holding Category C10 – Accreditation with the Building Professionals Board of New South Wales; and

 

The Building Fire Safety Audit Report together with recommendations and schedule of existing and or proposed Fire Safety Measures must be submitted to Council for Council’s consideration prior to implementation of the report recommendations.

 

Reason: Council is aware that the existing provisions for fire safety or fire safety awareness are not adequate so as to prevent fire, suppress fire or prevent the spread of fire or ensure or promote the safety of persons in the event of a fire.

 

Period for compliance with order:

The order, is to be complied with within 270 days (9months) from the date of the order or a time that is considered reasonable after Council officers have consulted with the owners.

 

3.   THAT Council, in accordance with powers of Section 121(B) 6b of the EP&AA 1979,  order the owners of the building to undertake the following specified work to ensure and to promote adequate fire safety and fire safety awareness:

 

1.    Connect the sprinkler alarm valve wiring to the building’s fire indicator panel to provide an alarm signal required by both Australian Standard (AS) 1670 and AS2118;

 

Reason: Sprinkler alarm valve signalling equipment was found not wired in accordance with both AS1670 and AS2118 to the building’s fire indicator panel fire monitoring/alarm to send an automatic alarm call to Fire & Rescue New South Wales to attend the building.

 

2.       Assess and alter the identification address given for the sprinkler system on the fire indicator panel so it corresponds  correctly to each individual sprinkler alarm valve;

 

Reason: Examination of the fire indicator panel found the addressing of the sprinkler installations did not correspond with that indicated on each individual sprinkler alarm valve.

 

3.       Review and amend the required block plan for the sprinkler system, so as to clearly demonstrate  which individual  sprinkler valve supplies water to service each separate area of the building;

 

Reason: Examination of the required block plan, (found on the wall above the sprinkler alarm valves) did not adequately demonstrate the system of water supply to firefighting appliances.

 

4.       Connect the pump’s alarm valve wiring to the building’s fire indicator panel to provide an alarm signal required by AS1670, AS2118 and AS2419;

 

Reason: To provide emergency automatic signal to F&RNSW in the event of a fire.

 

5.       Provide a resealable 20 litres fuel container filled with dieseline fuel so as to comply with AS2118 and AS2419;

 

Reason: The hydrant and sprinkler pump room was found not to have an adequate supply of dieseline so as to operate the diesel powered pump.

 

6.       Replace the existing door assembly, providing access to the hydrant and sprinkler pump room with a self-closing fire door assembly that has a fire resistance level of not less than -/120/30.  Install only approved and compliant door hardware and furniture comprising:

·        “D” handle latch installed to Building Code of Australia (BCA) clause D2.21

·        door closer

·        vent that has an intumescent fire damper core

·        fix compliance fire door assembly tags to door and jamb in compliance with AS1905.1 

 

Reason: The door providing access to the hydrant and sprinkler pump room required to be a compliant self-closing fire door was found to be a non-compliant door and the door providing access to the hydrant and sprinkler pump room was found to have a louvered vent installed that did not have intumescent damper installed in the core of the vent.

 

7.  Install a retro-fitted fire rated collar having a fire resistance level of not less than -/120/- to the underside of the floor slab to collar the plumbing of the floor waste from the hydrant and sprinkler pump room.

 

Reason: The floor waste in the hydrant and sprinkler pump room is not protected to prevent the spread of fire into the pump room.

 

8.       Install within the hydrant and sprinkler pump room, floor bunding to isolate the floor area surrounding the diesel pump and provide a supply absorbent material suitable to absorb fuel spills.

 

Reason: The hydrant and sprinkler pump room has no bunding to contain spillages and no absorbent materials to soak up a diesel fuel spill.

 

9.     Replace the existing fire door assemblies with doors having a fire resistance level of not less than -/60/30 and reverse the swing of each replacement exit door from the visitor and resident car parking areas, so as to open in the direction of egress/ travel ,  in the direction of the fire-isolated stairs.  Install to each replacement fire door assembly:

·    an approved and compliant single “D” handle latching device that requires no key to open from the side of the door facing the person seeking egress

·    an approved door closer to ensure each fire door will self-close to latch

·    fit to both the fire door and jamb compliance tags, complying with AS1905.1

 

Reason: The required exit doors from the visitor and resident car parking areas were found key locked and to open against the direction of egress, contrary to the requirement of Clause D2.21 of the BCA and Clauses 185 & 186 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000. 

 

10.     Reposition all operational signs relating to fire exit offences to a height adjacent to “EXITS” where they can be easily read to comply with Clause 183 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

Reason: Operational signs relating to fire exit offences were found fixed to the wall adjacent to each door but not in a conspicuous location to comply with Clause 183 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

11.  Demolish and remove both glass enclosures that enclose the building’s fire exits.

 

Reason: The final exit doors from the basement car park and resident descending stairs do not open to required open space ; and

 

The final exit doors from the basement car park and resident descending stairs open to glass cover enclosures that in the event of a fire would become smoke logged to an extent that would trap building occupants in fire-isolated stairs.

 

12.  Where fire door metal door frames have been designed and manufactured to be held in place by masonry fixings, install approved masonry fixings to comply with the manufacturer’s tested prototype assembly, as required to comply with AS1905.1.

 

Reason: Both exit doors from the carpark and descending fire isolated stairs have not been installed correctly.  The metal door frames designed and manufactured to be held back in place using masonry fixings were found installed without the required fixings. 

 

13.  Remove all chain driven window winders from all ground floor awning windows that face into central quadrangle courtyard.

 

Reason: Fusible release fire rated window shutters installed over ground floor windows facing into the central quadrangle court yard are prevented from shutting due to chain driven window winders attached to hold each awning window open; The windows being an awning type and opening outwardly, would, in a fire, due to the chain driven winders attached to each window, jamb each closing shutter open to provide no protection to building occupant evacuees.

 

14.  Cut back all vegetation growing over the escape path of travel, beginning at the central quadrangle courtyard, through to the Pacific Highway boundary and remove padlocks fitted to both gates.

 

Reason: Due to two steel gates being padlocked, building occupant evacuees escape path to access Pacific Highway is compromised and non-compliant, further, vegetation overgrowing the escape path of travel visually obscures and obstructs the path for evacuees contrary to the requirements of clause D1.10 of the BCA.

 

15.  Replace all non-compliant cast aluminium Storz fitted couplings with approved forged aluminium couplings that comply with AS2419.1 AS2419.2 and AS2419.3 and approved by Fire and Rescue New South Wales;

 

Reason: Cast aluminium Storz couplings fitted to the building’s fire brigade booster and attack hydrants do not comply with AS2419.1 AS2419.2 and AS2419.3; and

 

Non-compliant cast aluminium Storz couplings when subject to the operating load of a fire hose are known to fail, placing members of Fire & Rescue New South Wales at elevated risk of injury.

 

16.  Fit to each flow valve of the fire brigade booster assembly located at the Pacific Highway street boundary anti-tampering devices that comply with AS2419.

 

Reason: The building’s fire brigade booster valves located at the Pacific Highway street boundary are not fitted with approved anti-tampering devices that comply with AS2419.

 

17.  Remove all obstructions that jamb fire doors open, repair damaged fire doors where possible in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines, otherwise replace all fire doors on the basement levels that have been removed.  Install replacement fire doors that have a fire resistance level of not less than -/60/30 and install to each replacement fire door assembly:

·      an approved and compliant single “D” handle latching device that requires no key to open from the side of the door facing the person seeking egress

·      an approved door closer to ensure each fire door will self-close to latch

·      fit to both the fire door and jamb compliance tags, complying with AS1905.1

 

Reason:  Fire doors installed to garbage room and store rooms located on the basement levels are being jamb open and have been damaged or have been removed allowing in the event of a fire the fire to spread.

 

18.  Employ appropriate and suitable methods of construction to prevent the spread of fire via drainage and electrical cable penetrations through walls and through the underside of suspended concrete floor slabs that separate the basement carpark from residential portion of the building and between residential floors.

 

Reason: Numerous un-protected penetrations were found throughout the building requiring fire stopping collars or treatments in accordance with Clauses C3.12 and C3.15 and Specification C3.15 of the Building Code of Australia.

 

19.  On completion of the work, the owner of the building shall provide Council and the Commissioner of Fire & Rescue New South Wales with a Final Fire Safety Certificate in relation to each essential fire or other measure included in the building.  The certificate shall meet with the requirements of Part 9 Division 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.A further copy of the Certificate must be prominently displayed in the building in a location agreed to by Council. Further, it will be necessary every 12 months from the date of new Fire Safety schedule to supply Council with an Annual Fire Safety Statement pursuant to the requirements of Part 9 Division 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 the details of which will be available on application.

 

Reason: Installed fire safety measures are not adequately being maintained in accordance with relevant Standards and this constitutes a significant fire hazard and the Annual Fire Safety Statements that have been submitted Council since 2005 have omitted to include a number of fire safety measures, whilst the inspection undertaken by F&RNSW and Council’s revealed those measures installed were not being maintained.

 

Period for compliance with order

 

The order is to be complied with, within 270 days (nine months) from the date of the order or a time that is considered reasonable after Council officers have consulted with the owners.

 

 

 

 

Warwick Bailey

Fire Safety Coordinator

 

 

Anne Seaton

Manager Regulation & Compliance

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Building Fire Safety Report by Fire & Rescue New South Wales

 

2017/178202

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.4 / 101

 

 

Item GB.4

DA0249/16

 

15 June 2017

 

 

development application

 

 

Summary Sheet

 

Report title:

24-28 Holford Crescent, Gordon - Demolition of existing structures and construction of a seniors living development comprising 16 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works - Integrated Development (NSW Rural Fire Service under the RFS Act 1997)

ITEM/AGENDA NO:

GB.4

 

 

Application No:

DA0249/16

Property Details:

24-28 Holford Crescent, Gordon

Lot & DP No: Lot 4 DP 16691

Site area (m2):  4256m2

Zoning: R2 Low density residential and part SP2 Infrastructure (Local Road)      

Ward:

Gordon

Proposal/Purpose:

Demolition of existing structures and construction of a seniors living development comprising 16 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works

Type of Consent:

Integrated (NSW Rural Fire Service under the RFS Act 1997)

Applicant:

Crawford Architects Pty Ltd

Owner:

Mr Bin Xu

Date Lodged:

7 June 2016

Recommendation:

Approval

 

 

  

 


Purpose of Report

 

To determine Development Application No. DA0249/16 which seeks demolition of existing structures and construction of a seniors living development comprising 16 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works on land at 24-28 Holford Crescent, Gordon.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Places, Spaces & Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P3.1 The built environment delivers attractive, interactive and sustainable living and working environments

A high standard of design quality and building environmental performance is achieved in new development.

Assessment of applications is consistent with Council’s adopted LEP’s and DCP’s.

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Issues:                                                  Building height

 

Submissions:                                         Original proposal: 6 submissions; amended proposal:  4 submissions

 

Land & Environment Court:                   N/A

 

Recommendation:                                 Approval

 

History

 

Site

 

The site has a history of residential use.

 

Pre-DA

 

On 17 May 2016, a Pre DA consultation was undertaken for the proposed demolition of the existing structures and construction of a seniors living development comprising 16 units. The applicant was advised of the following key issues:

 

·     compliance with SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004, including access provisions

·     height (no. of storeys) and potential visual impacts

·     visual amenity and privacy to neighbouring properties

·     Site constraints, including topography, biodiversity, bushfire risk, SP2 land (future road) to site frontage

 

DA History

 

7 June 2016                                              The application was lodged.

                            

24 June 2016                                            The application was notified to neighbouring property owners and advertised for a period of 30 days.

 

1 September 2016                                              A letter was sent to the applicant advising of issues relating to:

 

Planning

-    Lower basement/lobby details

-    accessibility

-    height

-    streetscape

 

Engineering

-     plan clarifications

-     entry path details

-     RFS turning circle requirement

-     driveway design

-     waste collection access

 

                                                                  Landscaping

-     BASIX inconsistencies

-     fire certification for landscape plan

-     landscape plan details

-     impacts of drainage works

-     access ramp amendments

-     roofline conflict with tree canopy

 

Ecology

-     Vegetation management plan required

 

Rural Fire Services

-     turning circle requirement for emergency management

 

14 September 2016                                  A meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the issues identified in Council’s letter and amendments required to enable further assessment. The applicant submitted a concept amended plan indicating a turning circle in response to RFS requirement.

 

22 September 2016                                  Additional plans and information were submitted in response to Council’s request, advising further information is to follow.

 

11 October 2016                                       The RFS gave concurrence to the development proposal, subject to conditions.

 

17 November 2016                                   Amended plans and information were submitted.

 

6 December 2016                                     The amended application was notified to neighbouring property owners for a period of 14 days.

 

1 February 2017                                       Council sent a response to the applicant advising further detailed resolution and information was required in response to issues relating to:

 

Engineering

-     access details

-     water management

 

Landscaping

-     BASIX inconsistencies

-     fire certification for landscape plan

 

Ecology

-     Vegetation management plan amendments

 

10 February 2017                                     Additional engineering information was submitted.

 

7 March 2017                                            A bushfire certified landscape plan and amended vegetation management plan was submitted.

 

18 May 2017                                              A revised BASIX Certificate was submitted.

 

29 June 2017                                            Amended plans were submitted, indicating a reduction in building height.

 

The Site

 

Site description

 

The subject site is described as Lot 4 DP 16691 and is known as No. 24-28 Holford Crescent, Gordon. The site is a battleaxe-shaped allotment which has its main frontage to the north-western side of Holford Crescent and a narrow access handle frontage to the south-eastern side of Ryde Road.

 

The site has a total area of 4256m2, including the access handle (195m2). The site has a maximum width of 80.47 metres along its frontage to Holford Crescent and a depth of 51.96 metres, excluding the access handle. The access handle has a width of 4.265 metres and a length of 45.72 metres.

 

A narrow portion of the site along the full extent of the south-eastern boundary (adjacent to the Holford Crescent frontage) is zoned SP2 Local Road. This land is dedicated for the future envisaged construction of an extension of Holford Crescent for a length of approximately 180 metres to the north-east to connect with the remainder of the existing formed road (Holford Crescent).

 

The topography of the site is marked by a significant westerly cross fall from the Holford Crescent frontage towards the rear boundary and adjoining access handle. The site falls further along the access handle towards Ryde Road. The extent of the fall across the site is varied but is particularly steep across the western (rear) portion of the site where the gradient is up to 50%.

 

The site is currently occupied by a two storey brick dwelling and swimming pool. Vehicular access is provided by a concrete driveway to Holford Crescent.  Concrete vehicular driveway tracks also exist along the access handle.

 

The existing structures are positioned centrally on the site and surrounded by a landscaping setting, which consists of number of significant trees and dense vegetation, particularly on the steeply sloping areas. Portions of these landscaped areas are also identified on Council’s  mapping as containing biodiversity-significant land and vegetation characteristic of an endangered ecological community, Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF) (refer to ecology comments below for further details).

 

The majority of the site is identified as bushfire prone land (buffer zone), with the exception of in the north-eastern corner.

 

Surrounding development

 

The site is located within an area predominantly zoned for low density residential development, aside from the site’s south-eastern frontage being zoned SP2 Local Road as discussed above.

 

There are also a number of sites zoned E4 (Environmental Living) in the broader vicinity, including those on the opposite (north-western) side of Ryde Road and approximately 60 metres and beyond to the south-west of the site. The Pymble Business Park is some 140 metres to the north-east of the site.

 

The site has common boundaries with ten neighbouring lots containing single dwelling houses.  Seven of these adjoin the site’s rear boundary and have frontages to Ryde Road (No’s 52, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64 & 66 Ryde Road), including the battleaxe-shaped lot at No. 52 Ryde Road, which also adjoins the full extent of the site’s main north-eastern side boundary. To the south-east, the site is adjoined by the rear boundaries of the battleaxe lots at No’s 42 & 50 Ridge Street. The main south-western side boundary of the site adjoins the side boundary of No. 22 Holford Crescent.

 

The Proposal

 

The proposal, as amended, involves the demolition of the existing dwelling and associated structures on site and construction of a seniors living development comprising 16 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works as follows:

 

Ground floor: 8 units comprising a mixture of 2 x 1 bedroom units, 5 x 2 bedroom units and 1 x 3 bedroom units. All ground floor units feature balconies and the two and three bedroom units are cross ventilated, with secondary courtyards opening off the kitchen.

 

First floor: 8 units comprising a mixture of 2 x 1 bedroom units, 2 x 2 bedroom units and 4 x 3 bedroom units. All units on the first floor level feature balconies on north western elevation and the two and three bedroom units are cross ventilated with secondary balconies opening to the south-east.

 

All units feature open plan living, kitchen and dining area and include a minimum of one bathroom and laundry.

 

The basement contains a total of 18 car parking spaces, which includes 17 accessible spaces for residents and 1 visitor space. The basement also includes bicycle parking spaces, storage, waste management, maintenance room and WC. Three lift and stair cores provide access from the basement to the units above. Vehicular access to the basement is provided by a driveway with crossover to Holford Crescent at the south-western corner of the site and includes two restricted parking bays dedicated to fire tender/emergency management.

 

Due to the topography of the site, the proposed building also provides a lower basement/lobby level which includes a central lift core and stair access to the upper levels. This lower level is accessed from a proposed pedestrian pathway from Ryde Road, which includes a series of ramps along the access handle.

 

The proposed building footprint is generally surrounded by soft landscaping areas, including pedestrian pathways to enable access within these areas. A terraced area is proposed to the rear of the building, including a cabana structure. Proposed landscaping works are identified on landscape plans and in vegetation management plan and include the retention of a number of significant trees within building setbacks and planting of additional canopy trees.

 

Associated stormwater infrastructure works are proposed to manage drainage and runoff associated with the site.

 

Proposed works within the SP2 land at the site frontage are limited to the construction of the access driveway and hardstand area (eastern fire tender/restricted parking bay).

 

Amended plans

 

The amended plans incorporate a number of design changes, including:

 

·     modified access ramp arrangement to increase accessibility, soft landscape area and reduce tree impacts

·     turning area provision for fire emergency vehicles in accordance with RFS requirements.

·     roofline amendments

·     landscaping details, including vegetation management plan

·     reduced building height by 150mm

 

Consultation

 

Community

 

In accordance with the Ku-ring-gai Local Centres DCP, owners of surrounding properties were notified of the application. In response, submissions from the following were received:

 

1.       T & B Hand – 64 Ridge Street, Gordon

2.       R & A Sicha – 22 Holford Crescent, Gordon

3.       D & R Mather – 60 Ryde Road, Gordon

4.       D Walsh – 20 Holford Crescent, Gordon

5.       R Hill – 50-52 Ryde Road, Gordon

6.       F Tsang & W Yeung – 4 Holford Crescent, Gordon

 

The submissions raised the following issues:

 

Traffic impacts (during and post construction), including safety

 

The application is accompanied by a traffic and parking assessment report, demonstrating that the development will not will not have a significant impact on the road network within the local area. Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied with the traffic aspects of the proposal, subject to conditions. The engineering assessment has had due regard to aspects relating to driveway access, egress, manoeuvring and related safety implications and no objections are raised to the proposal in these respects. A Construction Traffic Management Plan will serve to control vehicular traffic during the construction phase of the development (Condition 12).

 

Inadequate accessibility, including pedestrian access to site, public transport and services

 

The proposal as amended satisfies the site-related requirements of SEPP Seniors 2004, including access within the site and to public transport (bus services) and associated facilities as specified by Clause 26. An access report supports the application in these respects.

 

Impacts associated with absence of turning circle at current end of Holford Crescent (existing and potential further damage from garbage, service and construction vehicles to neighbouring properties) 

 

There is no requirement for the development to provide a turning circle in Holford Crescent. The proposal makes provision for waste storage and collection on the site (within the basement) to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer. A Construction Traffic Management Plan will address vehicular traffic during the construction phase of the development (Condition 12).

 

The development will restrict the planned extension of Holford Crescent (land zoned SP2 Local Road)

 

Proposed works within the SP2 land are limited to the construction of the driveway entry and associated hardstand area (eastern fire tender/restricted parking bay). These works are permissible and consistent with the purpose of the zone, being for a local road. The proposed development does not rely on or inhibit the area of the site dedicated to the SP2 land.

 

Any approval should be subject to partial construction of the planned Holford Crescent extension, enabling access to neighbouring properties

 

There is no obligation in any planning provision for the development to construct the planned 

extension of the local road. The proposal will not prevent the planned construction of the

road at the relevant time.

 

Concerns that development in the access handle will impact the adjoining properties (Nos. 58 and 60 Ryde Road) including matters relating to stormwater flow, access, noise and safety (traffic and landslide risks)

 

The subject access handle is within the property of the development site. The proposal involves removal of the existing driveway along the access handle and its replacement with a pedestrian-only access path, including access ramps. The path is not expected to experience high usage given that the site’s main frontage is to Holford Crescent and suitable privacy will be maintained by dividing fences. All works are to be contained within the boundaries of the subject property.

 

There is an existing informal channel along the north-eastern side of the access handle which has stormwater connections from the neighbouring property to this channel. As noted by Council’s Development Engineer, there is no legal requirement for the development to preserve these connections and it is the responsibility of the neighbour to reconfigure their stormwater system to connect to the street drainage system. This can be achieved without affecting significant trees and the matter is a civil matter between the property owners, which does not necessitate specific plans or conditions under the current application.

 

No significant safety risks are envisaged as a result of the proposed works, including matters relating to traffic and landslide risks to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer. A geotechnical report has been submitted in this regard.

 

Visual privacy impacts

Potential visual privacy impacts on neighbouring properties have been assessed with respect to the applicable planning provisions (as below) and are considered to not be significant. Satisfactory levels of visual privacy will be maintained to neighbouring properties by site planning and building design and configuration, setbacks and vegetation/screen planting therein. Main living rooms, associated windows and open spaces of the proposed units are oriented internally towards their respective private open spaces and the site’s common open space (landscaped area), with adequate building separation and visual screens therein such as fencing and vegetation. In addition to the separation provided by the 14-15m setback of the balconies to the rear boundary , topographical characteristics (significant fall in ground level towards the rear boundary) also limit view lines to these properties.

 

Storm water flow impacts

 

The proposal includes stormwater management measures to minimise potential runoff impacts to neighbouring properties in accordance with DCP requirements and these are to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer, subject to conditions. This includes a 25,000L underground rainwater re-use tank.

 

Construction impacts of the development, including traffic and noise disturbances

 

Construction noise will be suitably addressed via noise and vibration management plan to be prepared in accordance with AS2436 - 2010 and with the Office of Environment and Heritage Interim Construction Noise Guidelines (Condition 20). Construction work will also be restricted to suitable daytime hours (Condition 46). Additionally, a Construction Traffic Management Plan will address vehicular traffic during the construction phase of the development (Condition 12).

 

Overshadowing

 

The proposal will maintain no less than 3 hours of solar access to the living rooms and principal private open space of adjoining properties between 9am and 3pm in midwinter. Accordingly, the proposal complies with the applicable planning provisions of SEPP Seniors 2004.

 

Lack of street parking

 

The proposal provides 18 car parking spaces (including one visitor space) within the basement on site in accordance with the requirements of SEPP Seniors 2004 and to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.  Accordingly, adequate car parking is provided and the proposal is not expected to adversely impact the existing availability of street parking.

 

Inadequate site analysis

 

Satisfactory site analysis information has been submitted in the form of plans and written documentation pursuant to the requirements of SEPP Seniors 2004. The proposed design responds appropriately to the site analysis.

 

Development inconsistent with environmentally sensitive land

 

Environmental aspects of the proposal relating to ecology, biodiversity and landscaping have been assessed by Council’s Ecological Assessment officer and Landscape Assessment Officer and are considered to be acceptable, subject to conditions. In this regard, the building footprint is consolidated in a central area of the site, which enables the retention of ample landscaped space and a substantial stand of canopy trees around the site, in addition to the proposed plantings. Biodiversity values of the site are considered to be enhanced through the adoption of a vegetation management plan.

 

Excessive slope for development

 

The proposed design responds adequately to the site topography pursuant to the provisions of SEPP Seniors 2004 as detailed in the below assessment report. Notably, the proposal provides single level floor plans for all of the units and compliant access within the site through the provision of lifts and access ramps. Proposed engineering and landscaping works are deemed to be acceptable by Council’s Engineering and Landscape Assessment Officers, respectively.

 

Neighbourhood amenity and streetscape impacts due to proposed height bulk and scale

 

The proposed is acceptable having regard to the planning provisions of SEPP Seniors 2004 in relation to potential impacts of height, bulk and scale as detailed in the below assessment.

The building complies with the applicable floor space ratio development standard and the proposed height as amended is considered acceptable as discussed below in relation to clause 40 of SEPP Seniors 2004 and clause 4.6 of the KLEP. The proposal will not create any unreasonable overshadowing to neighbouring properties.

 

The proposed building form is acceptable for the site having regard to the land size, building footprint, resultant setbacks and provision of soft landscaped area, which complies with the SEPP landscape area and deep soil area standards. The building presents a sympathetic single storey form to the main frontage of Holford Crescent with an appropriate setback of 17-18 metres from the property boundary and 9-10 metres from the SP2 zoned land. The rear of the building is set back some 15 metres from the rear boundary and 60 metres from the access handle frontage to Ryde Road.

 

The side setbacks are approximately 12 metres to the southern side boundary and range from 3-7.5 metres to the northern side, with the building being well articulated at each elevation. The landscaping provision for the development, including canopy trees within setbacks, will soften the appearance of built form as viewed from neighbouring properties and the street.

 

Tree impacts

 

Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer is satisfied with potential tree impacts of the proposal, including the removal of 4 trees, subject to conditions. The proposal maintains generous landscape amenity, including the retention of 28 canopy trees and replenishment planting of 15 additional endemic canopy trees. The proposal provides ample soft landscaping area within the building setbacks in accordance with the SEPP.

 

Bushfire risks

 

The site is bushfire prone land and, as such, the application was referred to the Rural Fire Service (RFS) in relation to potential associated risks (Integrated Development in accordance with Section 91 of the 'Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' and the Rural Fires Act 1997). The RFS considered the amended proposal to be acceptable which included turning area provision for fire emergency vehicles, subject to Condition 105.

 

Neighbours not adequately informed of development

 

The original proposal and amended plans were notified in accordance with the provisions of the Ku-ring-gai DCP as required.

 

Amended plans

 

Amended plans were notified to surrounding properties on 6 December 2016. In response, additional submissions from the following were received:

 

1.       R Sicha – 22 Holford Crescent, Gordon

2.       D Walsh – 20 Holford Crescent, Gordon

3.       D & R Mather – 60 Ryde Road, Gordon

4.       D & B Gooding – 58 Ryde Road, Gordon

 

The submissions raised the following additional issue:

 

View loss

 

The proposal will not result in any unreasonable loss of views, noting there are no iconic views across the subject site.

 

Within Council

 

Engineering

 

Council's Development Engineer commented on the amended proposal as follows:

 

The applicant has submitted amended plans and documentation which appear to address  previous concerns with one exception.  Notwithstanding, the application is now satisfactory from an engineering point of view, subject to conditions.

 

The existing informal channel along the north eastern side of the access handle has not been shown on the plans.  The stormwater connections from the neighbouring property to this channel have also not been shown.  Strictly speaking, there is no legal requirement for the development to preserve these connections and it is the responsibility of the neighbour to reconfigure their stormwater system to connect to the street drainage system.  This can be done without affecting significant trees, so it is considered that this may be viewed as a private matter which does not need specific plans or conditions under the current application.

 

The extension to the street drainage system in 300mm diameter pipe beneath the footpath (as shown on HDA04/P4) can be accepted in this instance, as it will be less disruptive than excavating in Ryde Road.  Services will have to be adjusted to accommodate the pipe and this will be completely at the applicant’s expense. 

 

It is noted that Roads and Maritime Services were notified of the DA but returned the cheque stating that RMS concurrence is not required.  Detailed plans of the pipe will have to be submitted to Council prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, and these plans would be referred to Roads and Maritime Services for any additional comment or requirement before approval.  For example, they may require the works to be carried out at night or on the weekend.

 

The alignment of the pipe may need to be shifted to be behind the kerb to avoid tree protection zones, and this can also be finalised during the detailed assessment at the appropriate stage.

 

The access ramp sections appear to be correct from an engineering perspective.

 

No driveway levels or Roads Act plans are required for the vehicular access from Holford Crescent, as there are no works required on Council land to construct the driveway or the fire fighting vehicle standing and turning areas. 

 

The other amendments to the stormwater management plans are satisfactory.  There are no engineering objections to the proposed development, subject to conditions.

 

Landscaping

 

Council's Landscape Assessment Officer commented on the amended proposal as follows:

 

The proposal is acceptable, subject to conditions.

 

Tree impacts

The development proposes the removal of numerous trees on site and works within the tree protection zone (TPZ) of other trees to be retained. An arboricultural impact assessment report has been submitted with the application. The following comments are made:

·     Tree removal – Trees W20, W21, W22 and E18 are proposed for removal. The trees are all Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine), assessed as being remnant specimens due to their size. The species is an endemic species.  The tree locations in the centre of the site result in spatial conflict with the proposed building footprint. The trees are outwardly in good health and condition and have visual prominence beyond the site to surrounding properties, as the site is otherwise cleared of trees beyond the perimeter boundaries. Due to their central location, the tree removal is accepted on landscape grounds, subject to concurrence from Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer (refer to below comments).

 

·     The proposed access handle walkway will require excavation within the TPZ of two trees located in neighbouring properties. The Landscape Assessment Officer concurs with the project arborist’s assessment of impact. Subject to the arborist’s recommendations being implemented, tree impact is at an acceptable threshold. Arboricultural recommendations to minimise tree impact is conditioned (Conditions 1 & 66).

 

Tree removal = 4

Canopy tree retention = 28 (in excess of DCP minimum requirements)

Replenishment planting = 15 additional endemic canopy trees to be planted

 

Landscape plan/tree replenishment

The landscape plan is acceptable. Minor amendments to replace unsuitable native shrub species with ornamental tree species within the southern setback for landscape and residential amenity to enhance the streetscape and landscape character is required (Condition 24).

 

Stormwater plan

The amended plans are acceptable on landscape grounds. Previous concerns regarding the sewer main are satisfactorily resolved subject to the sewer main being lowered and encased beneath the basement footprint as proposed by amended plans.

 

BASIX

The amended BASIX certificate and the proposed development are consistent for landscape areas.

 

Fire

The site is identified as bush fire prone land. Bush fire certification for the proposed landscape works has been provided. It is assessed that the proposed landscape works are in accordance with fire safety recommendations for the site.

 

Deep soil

SEPP Seniors 2004 requires 15% of the site to be maintained as deep soil landscape area. The deep soil zone is defined as that part of the site that is not built on, paved or otherwise sealed. There is soil of sufficient depth to support the growth of trees and shrubs on an area not less than 15% of the area of the site. Two thirds of the deep soil zone should preferably be located at the rear of the site and each area forming part of the zone should have a minimum dimension of 3 metres.

 

The site has an overall area of 4256m2 (3560m2 excluding the SP2 zoned land). The SEPP requires a minimum deep soil zone of 638.4m2/15% of the site area. 

 

By the applicant’s calculations, the development will have a deep soil zone area of 1509m2 or 35% of the site area and the Landscape Assessment Officer is in disagreement with some areas that have been included within the calculable area eg garden areas <3.0m wide, but is otherwise satisfied that the development exceeds the minimum deep soil zone requirements as required by the SEPP. By the Landscape Assessment Officer calculations, the development will have a deep soil landscape area of approximately 1333m2 or 31% of the site area, which exceeds the minimum 638.4m2/15% SEPP requirement.

 

Landscape area

SEPP Seniors 2004 requires a minimum 30% of the site area to be landscaped, which equates to 1276.8m2.The proposed development will have a  compliant landscape area of approximately 1654m2 or 39% of the site area.

 

Access handle to Ryde Road

It is noted that the proposal includes ‘switch back’ equitable access ramps and a hydraulic lift within the existing access handle. These in conjunction with the ‘dry creek bed’ design will result in limited landscape amenity planting being proposed within the access handle. However it is noted that the existing access handle with the current driveway has no screen planting and the proposed pathway is below a standard dividing fence height.

 

The amended proposal is acceptable, subject to conditions.

 

Planner’s comment: the access handle is limited to pedestrian access only (as opposed to current availability of vehicular access) and is not expected to experience high usage given the site’s main frontage being to Holford Crescent). It is also noted that some provision of planter boxes is incorporated within the access handle.

 

Ecology

 

Council's Ecological Assessment Officer commented on the amended proposal as follows:

 

During the site inspection the vegetation was inspected to determine the presence/absence of native plant communities. The vegetation onsite was considered to be Sydney Sandstone Gully Forest (SSGF) a non-threatened vegetation type however the applicants ecologist has assessed the vegetation as Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF), which is listed as an endangered ecological community under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 and subsequently has assessed the loss as a precaution.

 

Ecological constraints/environmental controls

The native vegetation within the site has been mapped as an area of “biodiversity significance” under the under the KLEP (2015).

 

DCP controls

The vegetation within the subject property is mapped under the DCP part 19.2 as a Category Support for Core & Biodiversity corridors and consolidation.

 

Impact assessment

As above, the vegetation onsite it considered to be Sydney Sandstone Gully Forest (SSGF), being a non-threatened vegetation type. However, the applicant’s ecologist (Cumberland Ecology) has identified the impacts as being the proposed removal of 4 Syncarpia glomulifera (Sydney Turpentine) trees from STIF community as a precaution.

 

The impact assessments concluded that the proposal will not have a significant impact upon threatened species pursuant to section 5a of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.

 

The removal of the 4 Turpentine trees will be offset via enhancement of the remaining area of vegetation through implementation of a vegetation management plan which will focus on weed removal, replanting and regeneration of the onsite vegetation.

 

The amended proposal is acceptable on ecological grounds, subject to conditions.

 

Building

 

Council's Senior Building Surveyor raised no objections to the proposal, subject to Conditions 21, 45, 93 & 97.

 

Outside Council

 

Rural Fire Service

 

The application was referred to the Rural Fire Service as Integrated Development in accordance with Section 91 of the 'Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' and the Rural Fires Act 1997. The comments provided by the Rural Fire Service in response to the amended proposal are as follows:

 

I refer to your letter dated 17 June 2016 seeking general terms of approval for the above Integrated Development in accordance with Section 91 of the 'Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979'.

 

This response is to be deemed a Bush Fire Safety authority as required under section 100B of the 'Rural Fires Act 1997' and is issued subject to the following numbered conditions (Condition 105).

 

The above referenced conditions concern measures to be taken with respect to the protection of persons, property and the environment from danger that may arise from a bush fire, in relation to:

 

·     asset protection zones

·     water and utilities

·     access

·     evacuation and emergency management

·     design and construction

·     landscaping

 

Accordingly, the amended proposal is considered acceptable from a bushfire management perspective, subject to conditions.

 

Roads and Maritime Services

 

The application was referred to the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) given the site frontage to a Classified Road (Ryde Road) at the access handle.

 

In response, the RMS advised that their concurrence is not required.

 

Statutory Provisions

 

Acts

 

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act)

 

The provisions of Section 79C (1) of the EP&A Act determine the matters for consideration in assessing a development application as stated below:

 

(a)      The provisions of:

(i)       any environmental planning instrument, and

(ii)      any proposed instrument that is or has been the subject of public consultation under this Act and that has been notified to the consent authority (unless the Director General has notified the consent authority that the making of the proposed instrument has been deferred indefinitely or has not been approved), and

(iii)     any development control plan; and

(iv)     any planning agreement that has been entered into under section 93F, or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under section 93F, and

(v)      the regulations (to the extent that they prescribe matters for the purposes of this paragraph), and

(vi)     any coastal zone management plan (within the meaning of the Coastal Protection Act 1979), that apply to the land to which the development application relates.

(b)      the likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality,

(c)      the suitability of the site for the development,

(d)      any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the regulations,

(e)      the public interest.

 

The relevant provisions of environmental planning instruments, proposed instruments, DCPs, the regulations and policies are addressed in the following sections of this report. The likely impacts, suitability of the site and public interest are also addressed below and the submissions received have previously been addressed.

 

State Environmental Planning Policies

 

Sydney Regional Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005

 

SREP 2005 applies to the site as the site is located in the Sydney Harbour Catchment. The Planning Principles in Part 2 of the SREP must be considered in the preparation of environmental planning instruments, development control plans, environmental studies and master plans. However, the proposal is not affected by the provisions of the SREP that relate to the assessment of development applications as the site is not located in the Foreshores and Waterways Area as defined by the Foreshores and Waterways Area Map.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

 

The proposal is subject to the provisions of State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 on the basis that it involves development with frontage to a classified road (Ryde Road). The relevant clause of the SEPP is provided below.

 

101 Development with frontage to classified road

 

(1) The objectives of this clause are:

 

(a) to ensure that new development does not compromise the effective and ongoing operation and function of classified roads, and

 

(b) to prevent or reduce the potential impact of traffic noise and vehicle emission on development adjacent to classified roads.

 

(2) The consent authority must not grant consent to development on land that has a frontage to a classified road unless it is satisfied that:

 

(a) where practicable, vehicular access to the land is provided by a road other than the classified road, and

 

(b) the safety, efficiency and ongoing operation of the classified road will not be adversely affected by the development as a result of:

 

(i) the design of the vehicular access to the land, or

 

(ii) the emission of smoke or dust from the development, or

 

(iii) the nature, volume or frequency of vehicles using the classified road to gain access to the land, and

 

(c) the development is of a type that is not sensitive to traffic noise or vehicle emissions, or is appropriately located and designed, or includes measures, to ameliorate potential traffic noise or vehicle emissions within the site of the development arising from the adjacent classified road.

 

The application was referred to the Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) and Council’s Development Engineer in relation to potential traffic impacts as above and no objections were raised in response.  It is particularly noteworthy that, although the proposal has frontage to a classified road (Ryde Road), vehicular access is provided by a road other than the classified road (Holford Crescent) and, as such, the operation of the classified road will not be adversely affected.

 

Additionally, the proposed development is considered to be appropriately located and designed to ameliorate potential traffic noise or vehicle emissions within the development arising from the classified road, which is a distance of more than 60 metres from the proposed building itself.  An acoustic assessment report has been submitted in support of the proposal as discussed below.

 

The proposal is also subject to Clause 102 of the SEPP as provided below.

 

102   Impact of road noise or vibration on non-road development

 

(1)  This clause applies to development for any of the following purposes that is on land in or adjacent to the road corridor for a freeway, a tollway or a transitway or any other road with an annual average daily traffic volume of more than 40,000 vehicles (based on the traffic volume data published on the website of the RTA) and that the consent authority considers is likely to be adversely affected by road noise or vibration:

 

(a)  a building for residential use,

 

(b)  a place of public worship,

 

(c)  a hospital,

 

(d)  an educational establishment or child care centre.

 

(2)  Before determining a development application for development to which this clause applies, the consent authority must take into consideration any guidelines that are issued by the Director-General for the purposes of this clause and published in the Gazette.

 

(3)  If the development is for the purposes of a building for residential use, the consent authority must not grant consent to the development unless it is satisfied that appropriate measures will be taken to ensure that the following LAeq levels are not exceeded:

 

(a)  in any bedroom in the building—35 dB(A) at any time between 10 pm and 7 am,

 

(b)  anywhere else in the building (other than a garage, kitchen, bathroom or hallway)—40 dB(A) at any time.

 

(4)  In this clause, freeway, tollway and transitway have the same meanings as they have in the Roads Act 1993.

 

The application includes an acoustic assessment report prepared by TTM. The report provides an assessment of the proposed development and concludes that the above specified internal noise criteria will be met with standard construction methods and materials for various building elements as specified within the report. Compliance with the report and the SEPP criteria is required by conditions (Conditions 1 & 32).

 

The relevant provisions of the SEPP have been taken into consideration in the assessment of the application and the proposed development is satisfactory, subject to conditions.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55)

 

The provisions of SEPP 55 require Council to consider the potential for a site to be contaminated. The subject site has a history of residential use and, as such, it is unlikely to contain any contamination. Accordingly, further investigation is not warranted in this case.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (BASIX): 2004

 

A BASIX certificate was lodged with the application as required and a revised certificate was submitted with the amended plans. The certificate demonstrates compliance with the provisions of the SEPP and is consistent with commitments identified in the application documentation.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 (SEPP Seniors 2004)

 

The application seeks consent for a Seniors Living development under the provisions of SEPP Seniors 2004. SEPP Seniors 2004 applies to the land as the site is zoned primarily for urban purposes and dwelling houses are permitted on the land.

 

The aims of SEPP Seniors 2004 are to increase the supply and diversity of residences that meet the needs of seniors or people with a disability, make efficient use of existing infrastructure and services and be of good design. This assessment finds that the proposal is consistent with the aims of the policy. The following aspects of the proposed development are noted in particular:

 

·      16 additional residences will be provided for seniors or people with a disability

·      the site is located to make efficient use of existing infrastructure and services accessible by public transport

·      the proposed design is consistent with the relevant urban design principles and guidelines

 

The relevant matters to be considered under SEPP Seniors 2004 for the proposed development are set out below.

 

Clause

Provision

Comment

Complies

Chapter 2 – Key Concepts

13

Self-contained dwellings

In-fill self-care housing:

Seniors living development that consists of 2 or more self-contained dwellings where none of the following services are provided on site as part of the development: meals, cleaning services, personal care, nursing care.

The proposal is classified as a group of 16 self-contained dwellings (in-fill self-care housing) used permanently for seniors or people with a disability.

YES

Chapter 3 – Development for Seniors Housing

Part 1 - General

14

Objectives

The objective of this chapter is to create opportunities for the development of housing that is located and designed in a manner particularly suited to both those seniors who are independent, mobile and active as well as those who are frail, and other people with a disability regardless of their age.

The development is located and designed in a manner particularly suited to those seniors who are independent, mobile and active as well as other people with a disability regardless of their age.

YES

 

 

15

What Chapter does

Despite the provisions of any other environmental planning instrument, any form of seniors housing is allowed subject to the development being carried out in accordance with this Policy and the development is on land zoned primarily for urban purposes.

Seniors housing is not a permitted land use under KLEP 2015, however, clause 15 of SEPP Seniors 2004 permits seniors housing on the site and prevails over the provisions of KLEP 2015.

YES

16

Development consent required

Development allowed by this Chapter may be carried out only with the consent of the relevant consent authority unless another environmental planning instrument allows that development without consent.

The proposed seniors living development requires consent from Ku-ring-gai Council, being the relevant consent authority.

YES

18 Restrictions on occupation of seniors housing

A consent authority must not consent to a development application made pursuant to this Chapter unless:

·       a condition is imposed by the consent authority to the effect that only seniors or people who have a disability may occupy any accommodation to which the application relates,

·       the consent authority is satisfied that a restriction as to user will be registered against the title of the property on which development is to be carried out, in accordance with section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919 , limiting the use of any accommodation to seniors or people who have a disability.

An appropriate condition is recommended to ensure the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Clause 18 (Condition 94).

YES

Part 2 - Site-related requirements

26

Location and access facilities

The consent authority must be satisfied, by written evidence, that residents of the proposed development will have compliant access to:

(a)     shops, bank service providers and other retail and commercial services that residents may reasonably require, and

(b)     community services and recreation facilities, and

(c)     the practice of a general medical practitioner.

 

Access complies with this clause if:

·       the site is within 400 metres of a public transport service and the distance is accessible by means of a suitable access pathway.

·       The public transport service will take those residents to a place that is located at a distance of not more than 400 metres from the facilities and services.

·       it is available both to and from the proposed development at least once between 8am and 12pm per day and at least once between 12pm and 6pm each day from Monday to Friday (both days inclusive),

·       the gradient along the pathway from the site to the public transport services and from the public transport services to the facilities and services complies with subclause (3).

The proposal is capable of satisfying the requirements of the provision, in that:

 

·       Public transport access to the required services and facilities at West Pymble village, Gordon local centre and Macquarie shopping centre is provided from a bus stop located on Ryde Road (approximately 155 metres from the subject site frontage), which is serviced by routes 560, 197, 575, 562.

·       The bus provides services to and from the above locations, in excess of once in the morning and once in the afternoon, Monday to Friday. In particular, bus route 560 is a loop service, connecting the site to West Pymble village and Gordon local centre.

·       The pathway does not exceed 1:24 gradient with 2 kerb ramps of less than 1:10 gradient.

·       Compliance with AS1428.1, DDA Transport Standards and Clause 26(1) and (2) and Clause 38 of the SEPP Seniors 2004 is required by Condition 30.

 

 

 

YES

28

Water and Sewer

The consent authority must be satisfied by written evidence, that the housing will be connected to a reticulated water system and have adequate facilities for the removal or disposal of sewage.

It is  demonstrated that the housing will have connection to a reticulated water system and sewage services.

YES

29

Site compatibility criteria to which clause 24 does not apply

A consent authority must take into consideration and have regard for the criteria referred to in clause 25 (5) (b) (i), (iii) and (v) which states:

 

·     25(b)(i) the natural environment (including known significant environmental values, resources or hazards) and the existing uses and approved uses of land in the vicinity of the proposed development,

·     25(b)(iii) the services and infrastructure that are or will be available to meet the demands arising from the proposed development (particularly, retail, community, medical and transport services having regard to the location and access requirements set out in clause 26) and any proposed financial arrangements for infrastructure provision,

·     25(b)(v) without limiting any other criteria, the impact that the bulk, scale, built form and character of the proposed development is likely to have on the existing uses, approved uses and future uses of land in the vicinity of the development.

 

The criteria in clause 25 are satisfied, in that:

 

·     the natural environment is generally maintained and where impacted, replenished with new vegetation;

·     there are services and infrastructure available to meet the demands arising from the development as discussed above; and

·     the development is of a design, scale and character that is compatible with existing uses and future uses of land in the vicinity of the development as demonstrated by compliance with the applicable assessment criteria.

 

 

 

 

YES

Part 3 – Design requirements

30

Site analysis

The consent authority must not grant consent unless satisfied applicant taken into account a site analysis prepared by the applicant in accordance with this clause.

A site analysis plan and written documentation, explaining how the design has regard for the site analysis has been provided.

YES

31

Design of in-fill self-care housing

The consent authority must take into consideration (in addition to any other matters that are required to be, or may be, taken into consideration) the provisions of the Seniors Living Policy: Urban Design Guideline for Infill Development published by the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources in March 2004.

 

This policy aims to promote a balance between need for greater housing choice and the need to safeguard the character of residential neighbourhoods.

The proposal is consistent with the aims and provisions of the Seniors Living Policy: Urban Design Guideline for Infill Development.

 

The proposal is acceptable with respect to the key issues for designing infill development as outlined by the policy guideline, including:

·     responding to context;

·     site planning and design;

·     impact on streetscape;

·     impacts on neighbours; and

·     internal site amenity.

 

The proposal provides a satisfactory response pursuant to the aims of the policy.

YES

32

Design of residential development

A consent authority must not consent to a development application unless satisfied that the proposed development demonstrates that adequate regard has been given to the principles set out in Division 2.

The proposal has adequate regard to the principles.

 

Each principle is addressed in Clauses 33 – 39 below.

YES

33 Neighbour-hood amenity and streetscape

The proposed development should:

 

·       contribute to the quality and identity of the area

·       maintain reasonable neighbourhood amenity and appropriate residential character

·       provide front building of the development set back in sympathy with the existing building line

·       embody planting that is in sympathy with other planting in the streetscape

·       retain, wherever reasonable, major existing trees

·       be designed so that no building is constructed in a riparian zone

The proposed built form as amended is compatible with the residential character of the locality by providing acceptable front, side and rear setbacks with provision for substantial screen panting therein.

 

The front building line is set back 17-18m from the front property boundary and 9-10m from the SP2 zoned land. The front setback is greater than that of the existing dwelling on site and acceptable having regard to the variable front setbacks in the streetscape, while retaining suitable provision for soft landscaping/planting as characteristic in the locality.

 

The proposed building footprint allows the retention of a significant stand of major existing trees adjacent to the site’s side and rear boundaries, in addition to new plantings, which will visually soften and screen the appearance of built form.

 

Overall, the development has an acceptable impact upon the streetscape and visual amenity of the locality, including that of neighbouring properties.

YES

34

Visual and acoustic privacy

The proposed development should consider the visual and acoustic privacy of neighbours in the vicinity and residents by:

 

·       appropriate site planning, the location and design of windows and balconies, the use of screening devices and landscaping, and

·       ensuring acceptable noise levels in bedrooms of new dwellings by locating them away from driveways, parking areas and paths.

 

The amended proposal responds adequately to neighbouring privacy and amenity considerations given site planning and design details, including the placement and orientation of windows to minimise potential for overlooking, in addition to the existing visual separation provided by setbacks, topographical characteristics (in particular the steep fall to the rear and resultant sight lines), boundary fencing and provision for screening vegetation.

 

Bedrooms within the proposed dwellings are located appropriately and will not be significantly affected by noise from driveways and parking areas given the provision of the basement car park. Compliance with the submitted acoustic report and noise criteria of SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007 is required by Conditions 1 & 32.

 

The pedestrian access path along the access handle is not expected to result in excessive noise levels given its expected relatively low usage having regard to the number of units it will service and the adjacent boundary fencing.

YES

35

Solar access and design for climate

The proposed development should:

·       ensure adequate daylight to the main living areas of neighbours in the vicinity and residents and adequate sunlight to substantial areas of private open space, and

·       involve site planning, dwelling design and landscaping that reduces energy use and makes the best practicable use of natural ventilation solar heating and lighting by locating the windows of living and dining areas in a northerly direction.

Shadow diagrams submitted demonstrate that the proposal ensures adequate daylight and solar access is maintained to the main living areas and private open space of neighbours.

 

The site planning and dwelling design facilitates optimal daylight and solar access by the northern orientation of proposed dwellings and their main living spaces. Additionally, 75% of the units have dual aspect with external private open space located on the north and south elevations to maximise climatic amenity.

YES

36 Stormwater

The proposed development should:

·       control and minimise the disturbance and impacts of stormwater runoff on adjoining properties and receiving waters by, for example, finishing driveway surfaces with semi-pervious material, minimising the width of paths and minimising paved areas, and

·       include, where practical, on-site stormwater detention or re-use for second quality water uses.

The amended proposal provides for satisfactory stormwater management by virtue of the below ground on-site detention tank and rainwater re-use tank, thereby minimising impacts to adjoining properties to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer.

 

The parking areas are located within the basement, which is consolidated within the building footprint, maximising the provision of soft landscaped areas to allow for natural stormwater absorption.

 

YES

37 Crime Prevention

The proposed development should provide personal property security for residents and visitors and encourage crime prevention by:

·       site planning that allows observation of the approaches to a dwelling entry from inside each dwelling and general observation of public areas, driveways and streets from a dwelling that adjoins any such area, driveway or street, and

·       where shared entries are required, providing shared entries that serve a small number of dwellings and that are able to be locked, and

·       providing dwellings designed to allow residents to see who approaches their dwellings without the need to open the front door.

The proposal provides pathways to each dwelling and facilitates suitable passive surveillance by allowing observation from the dwelling entries.

 

 

 

 

YES

38 Accessibility

The proposed development should:

·       have obvious and safe pedestrian links from the site that provide access to public transport services or local facilities, and

·       provide attractive, yet safe, environments for pedestrians and motorists with convenient access and parking for residents and visitors.

 

An Access Report prepared by Morris-Goding Accessibility Consulting, dated 3 June 2016, was submitted with the application.

 

The report provides that safe and convenient pedestrian links to local facilities (via public bus services) are available to and from the site.

 

The proposal provides an attractive landscape setting with pedestrian access ramps to assist negotiating the topography. Motorists will be sufficiently catered for with basement parking provision for residents and visitors, including accessible spaces.  Three lifts are provided to access the units from the basement (in addition to stair cores).

YES

39

Waste Management

The proposed development should be provided with waste facilities that maximise recycling by the provision of appropriate facilities.

Waste and recycling areas are designated in all dwellings and a centralised waste collection area is provided within the basement to satisfy the local waste management requirements under KDCP 2015.

YES

Part 4 – Development Standards to be complied with

40 Development standards – minimum sizes and building height

A consent authority must not consent to a development application made pursuant to this Chapter unless the proposed development complies with the standards specified in this clause.

Site size

The size of the site must be at least 1,000 square metres.

The site has an area of 4256m2.

YES

Site frontage

The site frontage must be at least 20 metres wide measured at the building line.

The site has a frontage of approximately 78 metres at the building line.

YES

Height in zones where residential flat buildings are not permitted:

The height of all buildings in the proposed development must be 8 metres or less, and

The amended proposal has a maximum building height of 9.45 metres.

NO

A building that is adjacent to a boundary of the site (being the site, not only of that particular development, but also of any other associated development to which this Policy applies) must be not more than 2 storeys in height

The building is 3 storeys in height adjacent to the north-western (rear) boundary.

NO

A building located in the rear 25% area of the site must not exceed 1 storey in height.

No building is located within the rear 25% of the site.

YES

41

Standards for hostels and self-contained dwellings

A consent authority must not consent to a development application made pursuant to this Chapter to carry out development for the purpose of a hostel or self-contained dwelling unless the proposed development complies with the standards specified in Schedule 3 for such development. 

 

An Accessibility Report was submitted with the application. The report provides that the units are capable of complying with the accessibility and useability standards specified in Schedule 3.

 

Refer to Schedule 3 assessment at the end of this compliance table.

YES

Part 7 – Development standards that cannot be used as grounds to refuse consent

46

Inter-relationship of Part with design principles in Part 3

Nothing in this Part permits the granting of consent to a development application made pursuant to this Chapter if the consent authority is satisfied that the proposed development does not demonstrate that adequate regard has been given to the principles set out in Division 2 of Part 3.

The principles have been addressed in the application documentation and assessed in detail in this report. Adequate regard has been given to each of the principles set out in Division 2 of Part 3.

YES

50

Standards that cannot be used to refuse development consent for self-contained dwellings

A consent authority must not refuse consent to a development application made pursuant to this chapter for the carrying out of development for the purpose of a self-contained dwelling (including in-fill self-care housing) on any of the following grounds:

Building Height:

if all proposed buildings are 8 metres or less in height (and regardless of any other standard specified by another environmental planning instrument limiting development to 2 storeys)

The amended proposal has a maximum building height of 9.45 metres, however the variation is considered acceptable as discussed below and as such does not warrant refusal of the application.

NO

Density and Scale:

if the density and scale of the buildings when expressed as a floor space ratio is 0.5:1 or less

The proposal has a FSR of 0.40:1.

 

 

YES

Landscaped Area:

minimum of 30% of the area of the site is to be landscaped

The proposal provides a minimum landscaped area of 39% (1654m2).

YES

Deep Soil Zones:

Minimum of 15% of the area of the site

The proposal provides a minimum deep soil zone of 31% (1333m2).

YES

Solar Access:

living rooms and private open spaces receive a minimum of 3 hours direct sunlight between 9am and 3pm in mid-winter to 70% of the dwellings of the development

The living rooms and private open spaces of all (100%) of the units receive a minimum of 3 hours direct sunlight between 9am and 3pm in mid-winter.

 

YES

Private Open Space for In-Fill Self-Care Housing:

Ground floor units: POS min 15m2 and one area 3m x 3m dimensions and accessible from a living area

 

First floor units: POS min 10m2 (or 6m2 for 1 bed dwelling) and 2m length or depth and accessible from a living area

Unit 2: POS area 11.5m2

 

All other units (ground and first floor) provide in excess of the minimum private open space requirements and are accessed directly from the living area.

 

 

NO

Parking:

Minimum of 16.5 car spaces (0.5 car spaces for each bedroom) where the development application is made by a person other than a social housing provider.

A total of 17 car spaces are to be dedicated to residences as required by Conditions 36 & 37.

YES

Schedule 3 – Standards concerning accessibility and useability for hostels and self-contained dwellings

2

Siting standards

Wheelchair access
If the whole of the site does not have a gradient of less than 1:10:

The proportionate percentage of dwellings must have wheelchair access by a continuous accessible path of travel (within the meaning of AS 1428.1) to an adjoining public road.

Continuous accessible path of travel to adjoining public roads to all (100%) of the dwellings.

YES

 

Common areas
Access must be provided in accordance with AS 1428.1 so that a person using a wheelchair can use common areas and common facilities associated with the development.

The amended proposal provides compliant access to the common areas as per the submitted Accessibility Report. The ramp system falls within the maximum height difference of 3.6 metre, which is suitable under DDA Premises Standards.

YES

3

Security

Pathway lighting:

·       must be designed and located so as to avoid glare for pedestrians and adjacent dwellings, and

·       must provide at least 20 lux at ground level.

It is recommended that certification is provided demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 27).

YES

4

Letterboxes

Letterboxes:

·          must be situated on a hard standing area and have wheelchair access and circulation by a continuous accessible path of travel (within the meaning of AS 1428.1), and

·          must be lockable, and

·          must be located together in a central location adjacent to the street entry or, in the case of self-contained dwellings, must be located together in one or more central locations adjacent to the street entry.

Letterboxes are located together in one central position adjacent to the main (Holford Crescent) entry that satisfies accessibility provisions.

 

It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved in this regard (Conditions 30 & 96).

YES

5

Private car accommodation

If car parking (not being car parking for employees) is provided:

·       car parking spaces must comply with the requirements for parking for persons with a disability set out in AS 2890, and

·       5% of the total number of car parking spaces (or at least one space if there are fewer than 20 spaces) must be designed to enable the width of the spaces to be increased to 3.8 metres, and

·       any garage must have a power-operated door, or there must be a power point and an area for motor or control rods to enable a power-operated door to be installed at a later date.

The application as amended proposes a total of 19 parking spaces within the basement level.

 

The allocation and dimensions of car parking spaces comply with the applicable requirements to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer, subject to conditions (Conditions 36 & 37).

 

The garage has a power-operated door.

 

YES

6

Accessible entry

Every entry (whether a front entry or not) to a dwelling, not being an entry for employees, must comply with clauses 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 of AS 4299.

 

The Accessibility Report provides that all main entries comply with the applicable standards or are capable of compliance at the relevant stage. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

7

Interior: general

Widths of internal corridors and circulation at internal doorways must comply with AS 1428.1.

 

The Accessibility Report provides that internal doorways and corridors can comply with the minimum dimensions. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

8

Bedroom

At least one bedroom within each dwelling must have:

·       an area sufficient to accommodate a wardrobe and a queen-size bed, and

·       2 double general power outlets on the wall where the head of the bed is likely to be, and

·       at least one general power outlet on the wall opposite the wall where the head of the bed is likely to be, and

·       a telephone outlet next to the bed on the side closest to the door and a general power outlet beside the telephone outlet, and

·       wiring to allow a potential illumination level of at least 300 lux.

The Accessibility Report confirms that the main bedroom within each dwelling is provided with a sufficient area to accommodate the required features. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

9 Bathroom

At least one bathroom within a dwelling must be on the ground (or main) floor and have the following facilities arranged within an area that provides for circulation space for sanitary facilities in accordance with AS 1428.1 :

·       a slip-resistant floor surface,

·       a washbasin with plumbing that would allow, either immediately or in the future, clearances that comply with AS 1428.1 ,

·       a shower that complies with AS 1428.1 , except that the following must be accommodated either immediately or in the future

·       a wall cabinet that is sufficiently illuminated to be able to read the labels of items stored in it,

·       a double general power outlet beside the mirror.

The Accessibility Report confirms that the bathroom on the ground floor of each dwelling is capable of accommodating the required facilities within the area provided.

It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

10

Toilet

A dwelling must have at least one toilet on the ground (or main) floor and be a visitable toilet that complies with the requirements for sanitary facilities of AS 4299.

The Accessibility Report provides that the toilet pans have suitable circulation areas that can be designated as visitable in accordance with AS 4299. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

11

Surface finishes

Balconies and external paved areas must have slip-resistant surfaces.

The proposed external paved areas are capable of compliance.

It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

12

Door hardware

Door handles and hardware for all doors (including entry doors and other external doors) must be provided in accordance with AS 4299.

 

The development is capable of compliance. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

13

Ancillary items

Switches and power points must be provided in accordance with AS 4299.

 

The development is capable of compliance. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

15 Living room and dining room

A living room in a self-contained dwelling must have:

·       a circulation space in accordance with clause 4.7.1 of AS 4299 , and

·       a telephone adjacent to a general power outlet.

 

A living room and dining room must have wiring to allow a potential illumination level of at least 300 lux.

Each residence has a living room capable of compliance for circulation space as provided by the Accessibility Report. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

16

Kitchen

A kitchen in a self-contained dwelling must have:

·       a circulation space in accordance with clause 4.5.2 of AS 4299 , and

·       a circulation space at door approaches that complies with AS 1428.1, and

·       the following fittings in accordance with the relevant subclauses of clause 4.5 of AS 4299

·       “D” pull cupboard handles that are located towards the top of below-bench cupboards and towards the bottom of overhead cupboards, and

·       general power outlets.

The proposed kitchen within each dwelling development is capable of compliance as indicated in the Accessibility Report. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

17

Access to kitchen, main bedroom, bathroom and toilet

In a multi-storey self-contained dwelling, the kitchen, main bedroom, bathroom and toilet must be located on the entry level.

Each individual dwelling has only one storey. As such, the kitchen, main bedroom, bathroom and toilet are located on the entry level for each of the dwellings

YES

18

Lifts in multi-storey buildings

In a multi-storey building containing separate self-contained dwellings on different storeys, lift access must be provided to dwellings above the ground level of the building by way of a lift complying with clause E3.6 of the Building Code of Australia.

The proposal involves 3 lift cores to service the dwellings from the basement. BCA compliance is required by condition (Condition 45).  Additionally, as recommended by the Accessibility Report, hatched pathways and increased lighting to lifts 1 & 3 within basement level 1 will be required to increase the level of safety (Condition 27).

YES

19

Laundry

A self-contained dwelling must have a laundry that has:

·       a circulation space at door approaches that complies with AS 1428.1, and

·       provision for the installation of an automatic washing machine and a clothes dryer, and

·       a clear space in front of appliances of at least 1,300 millimetres, and

·       a slip-resistant floor surface, and

·       an accessible path of travel to any clothes line provided in relation to the dwelling.

The Accessibility Report indicates that the proposed laundry within each dwelling is capable of compliance with the relevant requirements.

It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

 

YES

20

Storage for linen

A self-contained dwelling must be provided with a linen storage in accordance with clause 4.11.5 of AS 4299.

The Accessibility Report indicates that the dwellings provide linen storage in accordance with the clause. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

21

Garbage

A garbage storage area must be provided in an accessible location.

The proposal provides a consolidated basement garbage storage area in an accessible location suitable for residents as indicated by the Accessibility Report. It is recommended that certification is provided prior to issue of an occupation certificate demonstrating that compliance is achieved (Condition 96).

YES

 

Clause 40 Development standards – building height

 

Clause 40(4) of SEPP Seniors 2004 provides the following:

 

Height in zones where residential flat buildings are not permitted If the development is proposed in

a residential zone where residential flat buildings are not permitted:

 

(a) the height of all buildings in the proposed development must be 8 metres or less, and

 

Note : Development consent for development for the purposes of seniors housing cannot be refused on the ground of the height of the housing if all of the proposed buildings are 8 metres or less in height.

 

(b) a building that is adjacent to a boundary of the site (being the site, not only of that particular development, but also of any other associated development to which this Policy applies) must be not more than 2 storeys in height, and

 

Note : The purpose of this paragraph is to avoid an abrupt change in the scale of development in the streetscape.

 

(c) a building located in the rear 25% area of the site must not exceed 1 storey in height.

 

The above clause is applicable given the subject site is within a residential zone where residential flat buildings are not permitted (R2 Low density residential). The proposed building as amended has a maximum height of 9.45 metres and is 3 storeys in height adjacent to the north-western (rear) boundary. As such, the proposal does not comply with parts (a) and (b) of the above clause. The proposal complies with part (c) as there is no part of the building located in the rear 25% area of the site.

 

The non-compliances have been addressed by the applicant’s submissions pursuant to clause 4.6 of the KLEP. Clause 4.6 “Exceptions to development standards” allows Council to vary development standards in certain circumstances and provides an appropriate degree of flexibility to achieve better design outcomes. Council may grant the exception as the Director-General’s concurrence can be assumed where Clause 4.6 is adopted in accordance with the Department of Planning Circular PS 08–003, dated 9 May 2008. Clause 4.6(2) provides that development consent may, subject to this clause, be granted for development even though the development would contravene a development standard imposed by this or any other environmental planning instrument (in this case, being SEPP Seniors 2004).

 

In order to demonstrate whether flexibility in applying the development standards is appropriate in each instance, the requests have been considered against the provisions of Clause 4.6 below:

 

Clause 40(4)(a) – 8 metres height standard

The development standard restricts the height of a proposed building to 8 metres or less. The amended proposal has a maximum building height of 9.45 metres and as such does not comply with the standard. The breach arises largely as a consequence of the topography, in particular the significant fall of the site at the rear of the building, and essentially occurs on the north-western plane of the roofline above Units 13 – 16. The maximum extent of the proposed variation is up to 1.45 metres (18%), which occurs at the rear elevation (bedroom) of Unit 14. Axonometric sections of the breach are provided in Attachment A9.

 

Clause 4.6 (KLEP) provision

Assessment

Whether the proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard.

Yes

 

The SEPP standard itself does not identify particular objectives, however the proposal is consistent with the

aims of the SEPP, which are as follows:

 

This Policy aims to encourage the provision of housing (including residential care facilities) that will:

(a) increase the supply and diversity of residences that meet the needs of seniors or people with a disability, and

(b) make efficient use of existing infrastructure and services, and

(c) be of good design.

 

The proposal adds to the supply and diversity of residences that meet the needs of seniors or people with a disability by providing 16 new seniors living units in a mixture of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments. The proposal is able to make efficient use of existing infrastructure by having vehicular access to Holford Crescent and public transport availability via bus connection to required services and facilities. The proposal is of good design with the units being on a single floor plan, having good solar access and amenity, lifts and ramps for accessibility to common areas and generous landscape amenity, including provision of canopy trees. The design protects environmental and neighbourhood amenity by centralising the building footprint and providing generous landscaped setbacks around the perimeter of the site.

Whether the proposed development is consistent with the objectives for development within the zone.

Yes

 

The proposal is not inconsistent with the objectives of the R2 zone. In particular, the proposal provides for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment by providing a seniors living development within a generous landscaped setting that is compatible with the existing environmental and built character of Ku-ring-gai.

Whether compliance with the development standard unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case.

Yes

 

The applicant provides that compliance is unreasonable and unnecessary as all clause 4.6 criteria are satisfied, being that the development achieves the objectives of both the standard and zone as applicable and there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the variation. In particular:

 

i.    The proposal is designed to present as a single storey building to the Holford Crescent streetscape.

 

ii.   The north-western (rear) portion of the roofline exceeds the 8m height control as a result of the site topography.

 

iii.  The variation will not be visually significant and is a better design outcome ensuring the built form has a consistent roof form and does not include change in levels of the floors that would otherwise not be suitable for Seniors Living development.

 

iv.  The non-compliant portion of the roofline is some 12m from the rear boundary and will not be discernible from Ryde Road, noting the setback from the escarpment that recesses the appearance of the building as apparent from the road.

 

v.   The development complies with clause 40(4)(c) of the SEPP noting that there is no building within the rear 25% of the site.

 

It is further noted that the proposed variation to the development standard will not result in any significant adverse impacts on the amenity of the neighbouring buildings in terms of overshadowing, privacy, outlook and amenity when compared to a complying scheme.

 

Additionally, the proposed building elements above the height limit will not obscure any significant view lines.

Whether there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard.

Yes

 

The applicant provides that there are site specific and development specific environmental planning ground/s for the proposed variation.  In particular, the site contains unique environmental characteristics in terms of its gradient, significant tree stand and biodiversity values.

 

Strict compliance with the 8m height control would require changes to the building form, including stepping the building across the slope. This would thereby increase the area of the building footprint and in turn reduce landscaped area and setbacks to neighbouring properties.

 

A stepped design would also compromise accessibility for seniors or people with a disability by introducing additional floor levels to negotiate. The built form as proposed also minimises the level of excavation required to accommodate basement parking by utilising the natural slope to facilitate vehicular access to the basement.

 

When viewed from the main frontage of Holford Crescent the proposed development will not noticeably breach the height of building development standard.

 

As above, there are a number of significant trees, biodiversity and ecological values on the site which are preserved by the proposal by a restricted development footprint.

Whether the proposed development is in the public interest.

Yes

 

The proposal is considered to be in the public interest as it is consistent with the zone and development standard objectives.

Whether the proposed development is consistent with objectives of clause 4.6, being, whether by allowing flexibility in the particular circumstances a better outcome for and from the development is achieved.

Yes

 

The applicant has demonstrated that the proposal is consistent with the objectives of clause 4.6 and that allowing an appropriate degree of flexibility to permit a contravention of the height of buildings development standard will achieve a better outcome for and from the development.

 

In particular, strict compliance with the 8 metres height standard would likely result in a substantially increased building footprint that would have adverse environmental and amenity outcomes with respect to the natural topography of the site, setbacks and neighbouring amenity,  significant trees, biodiversity and ecological values.

 

The submitted request to vary the development standard is supported and applying flexibility in respect of the height of buildings development standard is considered appropriate in this circumstance.

 

Clause 40(4)(b) – 2 storeys height standard

The development standard restricts a building that is adjacent to a boundary of the site (being the site, not only of that particular development, but also of any other associated development to which this Policy applies) to no more than 2 storeys in height. The proposed building is 3 storeys in height adjacent to the north-western (rear) boundary and, as such, does not comply with the standard by virtue of an additional 1 storey. As above, the breach arises largely as a consequence of the topography, in particular the significant fall of the site at the rear of the building, which results in basement projection above the ground level across the rear elevation.

 

Clause 4.6 (KLEP) provision

Assessment

Whether the proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard.

Yes

 

The SEPP standard itself does not identify particular objectives, however the subclause (4)(b) details a note as follows:

 

The purpose of this paragraph is to avoid an abrupt change in the scale of development in the streetscape.

 

The proposal is considered acceptable in the above respect given the building appears as a single storey development to the main streetscape frontage of the site, being Holford Crescent. The visibility of the three storey component is limited to the north-western (rear) elevation, which is some 60m from the site’s other frontage (access handle) to Ryde Road. As discussed above, the visibility of the building is further recessed by the escarpment within the 12m setback area to the rear of the building, which further mitigates the appearance of the building.

 

In addition, the proposal is consistent with the general  aims of the SEPP, which are as follows:

 

This Policy aims to encourage the provision of housing (including residential care facilities) that will:

(a) increase the supply and diversity of residences that meet the needs of seniors or people with a disability, and

(b) make efficient use of existing infrastructure and services, and

(c) be of good design.

 

The proposal adds to the supply and diversity of residences that meet the needs of seniors or people with a disability by providing 16 new Seniors Living units in a mixture of 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments. The proposal is able to make efficient use of existing infrastructure by having vehicular access to Holford Crescent and public transport availability via bus connection to required services and facilities. The proposal is of good design with the units being on a single floor plan, having good solar access and amenity, lifts and ramps for accessibility to common areas and generous landscape amenity, including provision of canopy trees. The design protects environmental and neighbourhood amenity by centralising the building footprint and providing generous landscaped setbacks around the perimeter of the site.

Whether the proposed development is consistent with the objectives for development within the zone.

Yes

 

The proposal is not inconsistent with the objectives of the R2 zone. In particular, the proposal provides for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment by providing a seniors living development within a generous landscaped setting that is compatible with the existing environmental and built character of Ku-ring-gai.

Whether compliance with the development standard unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case.

Yes

 

The applicant provides that compliance is unreasonable and unnecessary as all clause 4.6 criteria are satisfied, being that the development achieves the objectives of both the standard and zone as applicable and there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the variation. In particular:

 

vi.  The proposal is designed to present as a single storey building to the Holford Crescent streetscape.

 

vii. The three storey appearance of the building is limited to the north-western (rear) elevation due to the site topography, in particular the natural fall to the rear and resultant projection of the basement level above ground level along this elevation.

 

viii.       The subject elevation is some 12m from the rear boundary of neighbouring properties and 60m from the Ryde Road/access handle frontage. The visual separation is further enhanced by the escarpment within the 12m rear setback that further mitigates the appearance of the building as apparent from neighbouring properties and the road.

 

ix.  The proposed building design includes a low pitch skillion style roofline and incorporates suitable materials and finishes to minimise visual impacts, including the use of timber screening to the rear elevation.

 

x.   The development complies with clause 40(4)(c) of the SEPP noting that there is no building within the rear 25% of the site.

 

It is further noted that the proposed variation of the development standard will not result in any significant adverse impacts on the amenity of the neighbouring buildings in terms of overshadowing, privacy, outlook and amenity when compared to a complying scheme. Additionally, the proposed variation will not obscure any significant view lines.

Whether there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard.

Yes

 

The applicant provides that there are site specific and development specific environmental planning ground/s for the proposed variation.  In particular, the site contains unique environmental characteristics in terms of its gradient, significant tree stand and biodiversity values.

 

Strict compliance with the two storeys height standard would require changes to the building form, including stepping the building across the slope. This would thereby increase the area of the building footprint and in turn reduce landscaped area and setbacks to neighbouring properties.

 

A stepped design would also compromise accessibility for seniors or people with a disability by introducing additional floor levels to negotiate. The built form as proposed also minimises the level of excavation required to accommodate basement parking by utilising the natural slope to facilitate vehicular access to the basement.

 

When viewed from the main frontage of Holford Crescent the proposed development will not breach the height of building development standard.

 

As above, there are a number of significant trees, biodiversity and ecological values on the site which are preserved by the proposal by a restricted development footprint.

Whether the proposed development is in the public interest.

Yes

 

The proposal is considered to be in the public interest as it is consistent with the zone and development standard objectives.

Whether the proposed development is consistent with objectives of clause 4.6, being, whether by allowing flexibility in the particular circumstances a better outcome for and from the development is achieved.

Yes

 

The applicant has demonstrated that the proposal is consistent with the objectives of clause 4.6 and that allowing an appropriate degree of flexibility to permit a contravention of the 2 storeys height development standard will achieve a better outcome for and from the development.

 

In particular, strict compliance with the 2 storeys height standard would likely result in a substantially increased building footprint that would have adverse environmental and amenity outcomes with respect to the natural topography of the site, setbacks and neighbouring amenity,  significant trees, biodiversity and ecological values.

 

The submitted request to vary the development standard is supported and applying flexibility in respect of the height of buildings development standard is considered appropriate in this circumstance.

 

Clause 50 Standards that cannot be used to refuse development consent for self-contained dwellings - Building height

 

Clause 50(a) provides that a consent authority must not refuse consent to a development application made pursuant to this chapter for the carrying out of development for the purpose of a self-contained dwelling (including in-fill self-care housing as proposed) if all proposed buildings are 8 metres or less in height (and regardless of any other standard specified by another environmental planning instrument limiting development to 2 storeys). The proposed building height as amended is 9.45m, however is considered acceptable as discussed above in relation to Clause 40 of SEPP Seniors 2004 and Clause 4.6 of the KLEP. Accordingly, it is considered that non-compliance with the control in this instance does not warrant refusal of development consent.

 

Clause 50 Standards that cannot be used to refuse development consent for self-contained dwellings - Private open space

 

Clause 50(f) provides that a consent authority must not refuse consent to a development application made pursuant to this chapter (in-fill self-care housing) if private open space for ground floor units is not less than 15m2 inter alia (as per the above compliance table). In the case of Unit 2, the private open space (POS) has an area of 11.5m2 and, as such, does not meet the standard. However, the subject POS is considered acceptable having regard to the following circumstances:

 

·     The subject POS is a balcony elevated above the finished ground level in this location due to the fall to the rear of the site and exceeds the minimum POS area for balconies specified by the SEPP as applicable to dwellings other than those located on the ground floor of a building.   

·     The dimensions of the POS exceed the minimum 3 metres in width and depth as required for ground floor dwellings (and 2 metres for balconies)

·     The POS is directly accessible from a living area as required.

·     The POS receives substantial amenity, including solar access and outlook to the landscaped rear open space.

·     The POS will be supplemented by landscaped communal open space area to the rear of the development.

·     All other units exceed the minimum POS requirements and are accessed directly from the respective living areas, representing 94% of overall units.

 

Accordingly, it is considered that non-compliance with the standard in this instance does not warrant refusal of development consent.

 

Local Environmental Planning Policies

 

Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 (KLEP 2015)

 

Zoning and permissibility:

 

The site is primarily zoned R2 Low Density Residential. Additionally, a narrow rectangular parcel of land within the site frontage to Holford Crescent (along the south-eastern boundary) is zoned SP2 Local Road. The proposed development is characterised as ‘seniors housing’, which is prohibited development within the site zoning. Notwithstanding, clause 15 of SEPP Seniors 2004 permits seniors housing on the site and prevails over the provisions of KLEP 2015.

Zone objectives:

 

In response to the R2 zone objectives, the proposed development:

 

·     provides for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment

 

·     enables other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents

 

·     provides for housing that is compatible with the existing environmental and built character of Ku-ring-gai

 

The proposed development provides housing for seniors or people with a disability (pursuant to SEPP Seniors 2004) within a generous landscaped setting that is not inconsistent with the objectives of the R2 zone.

 

The SP2 zone objectives are as follows:

 

·     To provide for infrastructure and related uses

 

·     To prevent development that is not compatible with or that may detract from the provision of infrastructure

 

Proposed works within the SP2 land are limited to the construction of the access driveway and hardstand area (eastern fire tender/restricted parking bay). These works are permissible and consistent with the provisions of the zone, being for a local road. As discussed above, the subject land is dedicated for the planned future construction of an extension of Holford Crescent along the site frontage to connect with the remainder of the existing formed road to the north-east. The proposed development does not rely on the area of the site dedicated to the SP2 land (659.45m2) and unencumbered access would readily be maintained by such road extension. Council’s Development Engineer has raised no objection to operational or vehicular access aspects associated with the SP2 land.

 

Development standards:

 

Development standard

Proposed

Complies

Building height:  9.5m

9.95m

NO

Floor space ratio: 0.3 :1

0.476:1 (exclusive of SP2 land)

NO

 

Clause 4.3 Height of buildings

 

The proposal exceeds the maximum specified building height for the land by 0.45 metres (5%) as indicated in the above table. Clause 5(3) of SEPP Seniors 2004 stipulates that, where any inconsistencies occur between Environmental Planning Instruments, the SEPP will prevail. The proposed building height is considered acceptable with respect to Clause 40 of the SEPP and Clause 4.6 of Council’s LEP as discussed above. 

 

Clause 4.4 Floor Space Ratio

 

The proposal exceeds the maximum specified floor space ratio for the site as indicated in the above table. Clause 5(3) of SEPP Seniors 2004 stipulates that, where any inconsistencies occur between Environmental Planning Instruments, the SEPP will prevail. The SEPP further indicates that a proposal cannot be refused in relation to floor space should the development not exceed 0.5:1. The proposal meets the floor space ratio provisions of the SEPP which prevail over the corresponding standard in Council’s LEP.

 

Clause 5.9 Preservation of trees or vegetation

 

The proposed removal of 4 trees on site in the location of the building footprint has been assessed as acceptable by Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer and Ecological Assessment Officer.  The proposal involves the retention of 28 canopy trees and replenishment planting of 15 additional endemic canopy trees. The proposal provides generous soft landscaping area within the building setbacks in accordance with the SEPP provisions, including ample deep soil provision.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the objectives of the clause to preserve trees and other vegetation that contribute to the amenity of the area.

 

Clause 5.10 Heritage conservation

 

The subject site does not contain a heritage item, is not located within close proximity to an item nor is it within a heritage conservation area. The proposed works do not affect any archaeological or Aboriginal objects or Aboriginal places of heritage significance.

 

Clause 6.1 Acid sulphate soils

 

The site is located within a Class 5 Acid Sulphate Soil zone and the works are unlikely to lower the water table. As such, no further investigation is considered necessary.

 

Clause 6.2 Earthworks

 

The proposal involves excavation up to a depth of approximately 8.4 metres to accommodate the lower basement lift lobby (located centrally beneath the building footprint) in order to provide an accessible means of pedestrian access to the Ryde Road frontage and the associated public transport service as required by SEPP Seniors 2004.

 

The basement is consolidated beneath the building footprint such that the required excavation is set back sufficiently from the site boundaries and will not significantly impact adjoining properties or the site and its surrounding environment, subject to conditions.  The proposed development will not restrict the existing or future use of the site, or impact the quality of the water table or disturb any known relics. The proposal is considered to be satisfactory in this respect.

 

Clause 6.3 Biodiversity protection

 

Portions of the existing landscaped areas on site are identified on Council mapping as containing biodiversity-significant land and therefore require consideration under Clause 6.3 of the LEP. It is considered that biodiversity values on site will be enhanced through implementation of a vegetation management plan which will focus on weed removal, replanting and regeneration of the onsite vegetation. Council’s Ecological Assessment Officer has considered the impact of the proposed development having regard to Clause 6.3 and found the amended proposal and vegetation management plan to be acceptable, subject to Conditions 4, 22 & 23.

 

Clause 6.4 Riparian land and adjoining waterways

 

The site is not identified as being within a riparian land area under KLEP 2015.

 

Clause 6.5 Stormwater and water sensitive urban design

 

The application involves the collection and discharge of all roof water to rainwater tanks with the overflow directed to a below ground detention tank. Rainwater re-use for toilet flushing and irrigation, as well as water quality measures are incorporated in the design, which achieves the BASIX water commitments and KDCP 2015 controls.

 

Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed development has been designed to control stormwater run-off as per Council’s requirements, subject to conditions.  Accordingly, it is considered that the development incorporates water sensitive urban design principles and is consistent with the objective of the clause to minimise the adverse impacts of urban stormwater.

 

Policy Provisions (DCPs, Council policies, strategies and management plans)

 

Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan 2015 (KDCP 2015)

 

The built form, siting and design controls are addressed above having regard to SEPP Seniors 2004. There are relevant additional general matters for consideration under KDCP 2015 such as tree preservation, water management, earthworks, landscaping and vehicle access. These matters are addressed in the following compliance table.

 

COMPLIANCE TABLE

Development control

Proposed

Complies

SECTION A

Part 13 Tree and Vegetation Preservation

13.1 Tree and Vegetation Works

The injury of any tree or other vegetation protected under this DCP is prohibited without the written consent of Council.

The proposal involves the removal of 4 trees. Council’s Landscape Officer is satisfied that the proposal will retain and protect significant vegetation, subject to conditions.

YES

SECTION C

Part 21 General Site Design

21.1 Earthworks and Slope

Development must be accommodated within the natural slope of the land. Level changes across the site are to be primarily resolved within the building footprint.

The site experiences a significant fall from the Holford Crescent frontage to the rear boundary and Ryde Road frontage. The development responds appropriately with a single storey building form to the Holford Crescent frontage and three storey form to the rear (including the basement projection). Access is managed through provision of lifts within the building and ramps externally.

YES

Landscape cut or fill should not be more than 600mm above or below natural ground line.

 

A minimum 0.6m width is required between retaining walls to provide adequate soil area and depth to ensure that they do not read as a single level change, and for the viability of landscaping. Retaining walls on low and medium residential density sites must not exceed 1m in height above existing ground level.

The proposal involves cut and fill of up to approximately 2 metres in the landscaped areas to the rear and front of the building as required to negotiate access across the steep fall in these areas.

 

The excavated areas will be supported by a series of retaining walls to be responding in height (ranging from approximately 1 – 2 metres). The retaining walls are sufficiently separated (>0.6m width) to create landscaped terraced areas in accordance with this Part.

NO

Existing ground level is to be maintained for a distance of 2m from any boundary.

Retaining walls are proposed within 2 metres of the access handle boundaries and southern side boundary. However, this aspect is considered acceptable as discussed below the compliance table.

NO

21.2 Landscape Design

Site Planning and Design, Planting

Council’s Landscape Officer has assessed the landscape plan and is satisfied that the design and plantings are acceptable, subject to Condition 24.

YES

22.2 General Vehicle Access

Provide well located and designed vehicle entrances that facilitate streetscape continuity and a high quality and amenity of the public domain.

Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed vehicular access has been adequately designed to achieve the control requirements. 

YES

22.3 Basement Car Parking

Basement design to be efficient, ecologically sustainable and provide safe and secure access

A logical and efficient parking layout is provided within the basement. Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the proposed basement has been adequately designed to achieve the requirements of this Part, subject to Conditions 35-37.

YES

Part 23 General Building Design and Sustainability

23.3 Sustainability of Building Materials

Consideration given to building materials that are recycled or recyclable, from renewable sources, durable, and, construction methods with low environmental impact

The application proposes building materials that are acceptable having regard to sustainability considerations. Condition 59 requires recycling of building materials wherever possible.

YES

23.4 Materials and Finishes

Comprehensive details provided with application to complement the streetscape and natural environment.

 

Proposed finishes and materials are satisfactory and consistent with the character of the surrounding environment. External walls are considered to be of suitable durability and quality.

YES

23.6 Building Services

All applicants must consult with service providers.

 

Services and structures required by the providers are to be located within basements, or concealed within the façade, with appropriate access. 

 

Standard consent conditions will ensure that building service requirements are complied with.

 

Service elements will not be visually intrusive to the streetscape or neighbouring properties in accordance with the objectives of this Part.

YES

23.7 Waste Management

All waste and recycling facilities must comply with the BCA and all relevant Australian Standards

 

All waste and recycle to be stored within site

 

Suitable access to collection point

A suitable waste storage area is provided within the basement, which is accessible to each unit by stairs and 3 lift cores.

 

Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied with waste management aspects of the proposal, including access, subject to Conditions 76 & 78.

YES

23.8 General Acoustic Privacy

High standards of acoustic privacy to be provided for occupants of the development and neighbouring properties

Suitable acoustic privacy will be provided to the occupants of the development and neighbouring properties commensurate with that of a residential context given the site planning, building setbacks and architectural design considerations.

 

Bedrooms within the proposed dwellings are located appropriately and will not be significantly affected by noise from driveways and parking areas given the

provision of the basement car park. Compliance with the submitted acoustic report and noise criteria of SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007 is required by Conditions 1 & 32.

 

The development will not significantly impact the acoustic privacy of neighbouring properties, particularly given site configuration, design considerations and building setbacks. The pedestrian path along the access handle is not expected to result in excessive noise levels to neighbouring properties given the relatively low usage expected due to the main frontage of the development and vehicular access being to Holford Crescent.

YES

23.9 General Visual Privacy

Private open spaces and principle living spaces of the proposed dwellings and adjacent dwellings to be protected from direct or unreasonable overlooking

The proposal as amended is duly sympathetic to the visual privacy of neighbouring properties having regard to site and building configurations, setbacks, window placement, floor plan layouts and screen planting, including topographical characteristics and resultant view lines to the rear adjoining properties.

 

As a result, the proposal will not result in any direct or unreasonable overlooking to neighbouring properties.

YES

 

23.10 Construction, Demolition and Disposal

Construction waste management and environmental site management plans required to address aspects of construction, demolition and disposal, including environmental protection.

 

Construction waste management and environmental site management plans were submitted as part of the proposed development. It is considered that the construction waste management plan meets the underlying objectives of waste management as required under the KDCP.

 

Environmental protection measures are incorporated in the proposed works, including material stock pile locations (avoiding inner tree protection zones).

 

Standard sediment and erosion control measures are required by Condition 13.

YES

Part 24 Site Design for Water Management

24A.3 Locating the Development on Site

The development must not be located so as to impede, divert or increase the rate or concentration of stormwater flow across a boundary onto adjoining private property (eg. by placing a solid wall along a boundary).

Council’s Development Engineer is satisfied that the development is located appropriately and satisfies the control.

YES

 

 

 

 

 

Sufficient space must be allowed on the property for the installation

and operation of water management measures as required in this

Part of this DCP.

The proposal satisfactorily integrates water management measures on the site.

YES

 

 

 

 

No more than 10,000 litres of rainwater tank storage may be located above ground.

The proposal involves a 25,000 litres rainwater tank which is located underground.

YES

Stormwater management devices such as on site detention systems and large water tanks, should be located within the basement or beneath other impermeable areas. eg - driveways.

The proposed rainwater tank is located beneath the basement footprint in accordance with the control.

YES

Where there is more than one dwelling, stormwater management devices should be located in common areas.

The stormwater management devices are located in common areas.

YES

The stormwater management system must not result in changes to the existing ground levels within the dripline of trees to be retained.

The proposed stormwater infrastructure as amended does not result in changes to the existing ground levels within the dripline of significant trees to be retained.

YES

 

Part 21 General Site Design – Earthworks and Slope

 

The proposal involves cut and fill of up to approximately 2 metres in landscaped areas to the rear and front of the building as required to negotiate access and increase usability across the steep slope in these areas, thereby exceeding the control of 0.6 metres above or below natural ground line. Additionally, retaining walls encroach within 2 metres of site boundaries within the access handle and southern side boundary, contrary to the DCP control as indicated in the above table. The excavated areas are proposed to be supported by a series of retaining walls responding in height (ranging from approximately 1 – 2 metres). The retaining walls are however sufficiently separated (>0.6m width) to create landscaped terraced areas in accordance with this Part.

 

The retaining walls are to be constructed of a mixture of blockwork walls with integrated planter beds in the access corridor and sandstone walls elsewhere (including adjacent to the southern side boundary), which will enhance the natural bushland appearance of landscaped areas on the site, in conjunction with the adjacent proposed planting areas.

 

Overall, site design and landscaping amenity of the proposal is considered acceptable as advised by Council’s Landscape Assessment Officer, subject to conditions. The proposal maintains generous landscaping areas around the perimeter of the building and between retaining walls with vegetation therein to soften the appearance of built form to neighbouring properties.  In particular, the proposal involves the retention of 28 canopy trees and establishment planting of 15 additional trees.

 

The proposed landscaping works are generally responsive to the existing site topography adjacent to site boundaries as practicable and are not likely to cause undue impacts to the streetscape or any neighbouring properties and is acceptable having regard to the objectives of this Part.

 

Part 25 Notification

 

The proposed development has been notified in accordance with the requirements of Part 25 of the KDCP 2015.

 

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010

 

The development attracts a section 94 contribution of $173,501.41 which is required to be paid prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate (Condition 43).

 

Likely Impacts

 

The likely impacts of the development have been considered within this report and are deemed to be acceptable, subject to conditions.

 

Suitability of the Site

 

The site is suitable for the proposed development.

 

Public Interest

 

The public interest is best served by the consistent application of the requirements of the relevant Environmental Planning Instruments, and by Council ensuring that any adverse effects on the surrounding area and the environment are minimised. The proposal has been assessed against the relevant environmental planning instruments and is deemed to be acceptable. On this basis, the proposal is considered to be in the public interest.

 

Conclusion

 

Having regard to the provisions of section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory.

Recommendation:

 

A.   THAT Council, as the consent authority, is of the opinion that the request submitted under clause 4.6 of KLEP 2015 to vary the building height development standards 40(4)(a) &(b) of SEPP Seniors 2004 have met the requirements of clause 4.6(4). Council is also of the opinion that strict compliance with the development standards is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstances of the case and that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the variation to the development standards.

 

AND

 

B.   THAT Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the proposed development will be in the public interest, grant development consent to DA0249/16 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a SEPP Seniors Living development comprising 16 units, basement parking, landscaping and associated works on land at 24-28 Holford Crescent, Gordon, subject to conditions.  Pursuant to Section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within two years from the date of the Notice of Determination.

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

A002-Issue B

Crawford Architects

21/11/2016

A100-Issue D

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A101-Issue C

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A102-Issue D

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A103-Issue C

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A110-Issue D

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A111-Issue C

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A112-Issue D

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A113-Issue C

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A200-Issue C

Crawford Architects

29/06/2017

A201-Issue C

Crawford Architects

29/06/2017

A202-Issue C

Crawford Architects

29/06/2017

A003-Issue B

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A005-Issue C

Crawford Architects

10/02/2017

A006-Issue B

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A007-Issue A

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A008-Issue B

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A009-Issue A

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

A010-Issue B

Crawford Architects

10/02/2017

A700-Issue B

Crawford Architects

31/10/2016

 

Stormwater plans:

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

HDA00/P1

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

01/06/2016

HDA01/P2

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

02/11/2016

HDA02/P1

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

01/06/2016

HDA03/P3

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

04/11/2016

HDA04/P4

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

09/02/2017

HDA05/P2

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

02/11/2016

HDA06/P3

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

04/11/2016

HDA07/P2

AJ Whipps Consulting Group

09/02/2017

Landscape plans:

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

SS16-3284 000 Rev E

Site Image

31/01/2017

SS16-3284 001 Rev E

Site Image

31/01/2017

SS16-3284 101 Rev E

Site Image

31/01/2017

 

Document(s)

Dated

Basix certificate No. 730664M_04

18 May 2017

Tree Assessment and Development Impact Report (Growing My Way Tree Services)

May 2016

Acoustic Assessment (TTM) Reference: 16SYA0010 R01_1

16 May 16

Access Review (Morris-Goding Accessibility Consulting) v2

9 November 2016

Bushfire Protection Assessment (Australian Bushfire Protection Planners, No. B162699

27 May 2016

Vegetation Management Plan (Cumberland Ecology) Report No. 16062RP3, v3

28 February 2017

Geotechnical Investigation (JK Geotechnics) Ref: 29292SBrpt

19 April 2016

 

Reason:       To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

3.     Approved landscape plans

 

Landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the following landscape plan(s), listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

SS16-3284 000 Rev E

Site Image

31/01/2017

SS16-3284 001 Rev E

Site Image

31/01/2017

SS16-3284 101 Rev E

Site Image

31/01/2017

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

4.     Vegetation management plan (VMP)

 

The Vegetation Management Plan, prepared by Cumberland Ecology, dated Revised 28th of February 2017 version 3 (Report No. 16062RP3), is endorsed in its entirety.

 

·          All works detailed within the VMP-revegetation, weed removal, weed techniques, environmental protection measures and proposed planting are to be carried out in accordance with the VMP.

 

·          All noxious and environmental weeds are to be removed from within the VMP area.

 

·          All works at all times within the Forest vegetation are to be conducted by a suitably qualified bush regenerator. The minimum qualifications minimum qualifications and experience (for bush regenerator) are a TAFE Certificate 2 in Bushland Regeneration and one year demonstrated experience (for other personnel).  In addition the site supervisor is to be eligible for full professional membership of the Australian Association of Bush Regenerators (AABR).

 

Reason:       To ensure the protection and enhancement of onsite biodiversity.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

5.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

6.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

7.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

8.     Dilapidation survey and report (public infrastructure)

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures of the following public infrastructure, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Public infrastructure

 

·        The heavy vehicle access route to the site - Ridge Street from Ryde Road to the southern intersection with Holford Crescent and Holford Crescent from that intersection to the site.

 

The report must be completed by a consulting structural/civil engineer. Particular attention must be paid to accurately recording (both written and photographic) existing damaged areas on the aforementioned infrastructure so that Council is fully informed when assessing any damage to public infrastructure caused as a result of the development.

 

The developer may be held liable to any recent damage to public infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, where such damage is not accurately recorded by the requirements of this condition prior to the commencement of works.

 

Note:    A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any excavation works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of public infrastructure before works commence.

 

9.     Dilapidation survey and report (private property)

 

Prior to the commencement of any demolition or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a dilapidation report on the visible and structural condition of all structures upon the following lands, has been completed and submitted to Council:

 

Address:

·  22 Holford Crescent

·  58 and 60 Ryde Road

     ·  60 Ryde Road

 

The dilapidation report must include a photographic survey of adjoining properties detailing their physical condition, both internally and externally, including such items as walls ceilings, roof and structural members. The report must be completed by a consulting structural/geotechnical engineer as determined necessary by that professional based on the excavations for the proposal and the recommendations of the submitted geotechnical report.

 

In the event that access for undertaking the dilapidation survey is denied by a property owner, the applicant must demonstrate in writing to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority that all reasonable steps have been taken to obtain access and advise the affected property owner of the reason for the survey and that these steps have failed.

 

Note:    A copy of the dilapidation report is to be provided to Council prior to any excavation works been undertaken. The dilapidation report is for record keeping purposes only and may be used by an applicant or affected property owner to assist in any civil action required to resolve any dispute over damage to adjoining properties arising from works.

 

Reason:         To record the structural condition of likely affected properties before works commence.

 

10.   Geotechnical report

 

Prior to the commencement of any bulk excavation works on site, the applicant shall submit to the Principal Certifying Authority, the results of the detailed geotechnical investigation recommended in the report by JK Geotechnics dated 19 April 2016. The report is to address such matters as:

 

·        appropriate excavation methods and techniques

·        vibration management and monitoring

·        dilapidation survey

·        support and retention of excavates faces

·        hydrogeological considerations

 

The recommendations of the report are to be implemented during the course of the works.

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

11.   Construction and traffic management plan

 

The applicant must submit to Council a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP), which is to be approved prior to the commencement of any works on site.

 

The plan is to consist of a report with Traffic Control Plans attached.

 

The report is to contain commitments which must be followed by the demolition and excavation contractor, builder, owner and subcontractors.  The CTMP applies to all persons associated with demolition, excavation and construction of the development.

 

The report is to contain construction vehicle routes for approach and departure to and from all directions.

 

The report is to contain a site plan showing entry and exit points.  Swept paths are to be shown on the site plan showing access and egress for an 11 metre long heavy rigid vehicle.

 

The Traffic Control Plans are to be prepared by a qualified person (red card holder).  One must be provided for each of the following stages of the works:

 

·     demolition

·     excavation

·     concrete pour

·     construction of vehicular crossing and reinstatement of footpath

·     traffic control for vehicles reversing into or out of the site

 

Traffic controllers must be in place at the site entry and exit points to control heavy vehicle movements in order to maintain the safety of pedestrians and other road users.

 

When a satisfactory CTMP is received, a letter of approval will be issued with conditions attached.  Traffic management at the site must comply with the approved CTMP as well as any conditions in the letter issued by Council.  Council’s Rangers will be patrolling the site regularly and fines may be issued for any non-compliance with this condition.

 

Reason:         To ensure that appropriate measures have been considered during all phases of the construction process in a manner that maintains the environmental amenity and ensures the ongoing safety and protection of people.

 

12.   Erosion and drainage management

 

Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.  The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction". Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

13.   Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Note:    Refer Plan SS16-3284 001 Rev E Tree Masterplan, for tree numbering and locations.

 

Tree/Location

Radius in metres

W07 - W17 Western portion of site

At a 1.0m offset on the northern and western side from the proposed driveway, returning to the northern site boundary at a 6.0m radius from W17.

E01

5.0m

E03

9.0m

E08-E16

6.0m

E19

7.0m

E20-E23

3.0m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

14.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

15.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

·          Tree protection zone.

·          This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·          The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

16.   Tree protection mulching

 

Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

17.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, a joint inspection of the site by the Project Arborist Principal and Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

18.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:    The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

19.   Noise and vibration management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, a noise and vibration management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified expert addressing the likely noise and vibration from demolition, excavation and construction of the proposed development and provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.  The management plan is to identify amelioration measures to achieve the best practice objectives of AS 2436-2010 and NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change Interim Construction Noise Guidelines. The report shall be prepared in consultation with any geotechnical report that itemises equipment to be used for excavation works.

 

The management plan shall address, but not be limited to, the following matters:

 

·           identification of the specific activities that will be carried out and associated noise sources

·           identification of all potentially affected sensitive receivers, including residences, churches, commercial premises, schools and properties containing noise sensitive equipment

·           the construction noise objective specified in the conditions of this consent

·           the construction vibration criteria specified in the conditions of this consent

·           determination of appropriate noise and vibration objectives for each identified sensitive receiver

·           noise and vibration monitoring, reporting and response procedures

·           assessment of potential noise and vibration from the proposed demolition, excavation and construction activities, including noise from construction vehicles and any traffic diversions

·           description of specific mitigation treatments, management methods and procedures that will be implemented to control noise and vibration during construction

·           construction timetabling to minimise noise impacts including time and duration restrictions, respite periods and frequency

·           procedures for notifying residents of construction activities that are likely to affect their amenity through noise and vibration

·           contingency plans to be implemented in the event of non-compliances and/or noise complaints

 

Reason:      To protect the amenity afforded to surrounding residents during the construction process.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

20.   Hydrant provision

 

Provision of hydrant coverage to the building and site is required in accordance with AS 2419.1- 2005. Details are to be provided to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:       To ensure provision of fire fighting resources.

 

21.   Project ecologist

 

A project ecologist shall be commissioned prior to the release of the construction Certificate to ensure all bushland/environmental protection measures are carried out in accordance with the conditions of consent.

 

The ecologist shall have a minimum qualification of TAFE Certificate III in Bush Regeneration or Conservation and Land Management - Natural Area Restoration. He/she shall have at least 4 years experience in the management of native bushland in the Sydney region. Details of the arborist including name, business name and contact details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority with a copy to Council.

 

Reason:         To ensure the protection of existing biodiversity values of the site.

 

22.   Nest boxes

 

Prior to works commencing three nest boxes comprising of 1 small mammal, 1 microbat & 1 medium mammal, shall be installed within the retained trees within the site. The nest boxes shall be constructed of durable wood material (marine ply) and installed at a minimum height of 6 metres from the ground and positioned under the direction of a qualified ecologist.

 

The qualified ecologist must hold an Animal Ethics Permit from the Office of Environment & Heritage and a wildlife licence under section 132C of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 issued by the Office of Environment and Heritage.

 

Reason:       To ensure protection of fauna species.

 

23.   Amendments to approved landscape plan

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the approved landscape plans, listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, have been amended in accordance with the requirements of this condition as well as other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

SS16-3284 101 Rev E

Site Image

31/01/2017

 

The above landscape plan(s) shall be amended in the following ways:

 

·          The proposed planting of Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash), Banksia serrata (Old Man Banksia), and Ceratopetalum gummiferum (NSW Christmas Bush) within the southern terraced site frontage shall be amended to be a mix of exotic ornamental flowering trees including: Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle), Acer palmatum (Japanese maple), Pyrus nivalis (Snow Pear) and Magnolia soulangeana (Saucer Magnolia).

 

·          The proposed planting of Westringia fruticosa (Coastal Rosemary) within the terraced garden areas within the southern site frontage shall be amended to Murraya paniculata (Orange Jessamine) to complement the existing streetscape and landscape character.

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the landscape plan has been amended as required by this condition.

 

Note:    An amended plan, prepared by a landscape architect or qualified landscape designer shall be submitted to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:       To ensure adequate landscaping of the site.

 

24.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

25.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

26.   Outdoor lighting

 

Prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all outdoor lighting will comply with AS/NZ1158.3: 1999 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Additionally, sufficient lighting and hatched pathways to lifts 1 & 3 within basement level 1 are to be provided to increase the level of safety as recommended by the Accessibility Report (referenced in Condition 1).

 

Note:    Details demonstrating compliance with these requirements are to be submitted prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To provide high quality external lighting for security without adverse impacts on public amenity from excessive illumination levels.

 

27.   Air drying facilities

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a common open space area dedicated for open air drying of clothes is provided. This area is to be located at ground level behind the building line and in a position not visible from the public domain.

 

In lieu of the above, written confirmation that all units will be provided with internal clothes drying facilities prior to the Occupation Certificate is to be submitted to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         Amenity & energy efficiency.

 

28.   External service pipes and the like prohibited

 

Proposed water pipes, waste pipes, stack work, duct work, mechanical ventilation plant and the like must be located within the building.  Details confirming compliance with this condition must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  Required external vents or vent pipes on the roof or above the eaves must be shown on construction certificate plans and detailed with construction certificate specifications.  External vents or roof vent pipes must not be visible from any place unless detailed upon development consent plans.  Where there is any proposal to fit external service pipes or the like this must be detailed in an amended development (S96) application and submitted to Council for determination.

 

Vent pipes required by Sydney Water must not be placed on the front elevation of the building or front roof elevation.  The applicant, owner and builder must protect the appearance of the building from the public place and the appearance of the streetscape by elimination of all external services excluding vent pipes required by Sydney Water and those detailed upon development consent plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the streetscape and the integrity of the approved development.

 

29.   Accessibility

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that access for people with disabilities to and from and between the public domain, residential units and all common open space areas is provided. Consideration must be given to the means of dignified and equitable access.

 

Compliant access provisions for people with disabilities and in accordance with Clause 26(1) & (2) and Clause 38 of the Seniors Living SEPP are to be demonstrated on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.  All details shall be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All details shall be prepared in consideration of the Disability Discrimination Act, the relevant provisions of AS1428.1, AS1428.2, AS1428.4 and AS 1735.12, in addition to the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

Reason:         To ensure the provision of equitable and dignified access for all people in accordance with disability discrimination legislation and relevant Australian Standards.

 

30.   Recycling and waste management

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the development provides a common garbage collection/separation area sufficient in size to store all wheelie garbage bins and recycling bins provided by Council for the number of units in the development in accordance with Council’s DCP. The garbage collection point is to be accessible for waste collection services.

 

The responsibility for:

 

·           the cleaning of waste rooms and waste service compartments; and

·           the transfer of bins within the property, and to the collection point once the development is in use;

 

shall be clearly stated in the Waste Management Plan.

 

Reason:         Environmental protection.

 

31.   Noise from road and rail (residential only)

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall submit evidence to Council demonstrating that the development will be acoustically designed and constructed to ensure that the following LAeq levels are not exceeded:

 

(a)        in any bedroom in the building—35 dB(A) at any time between 10 pm and 7 am,

(b)        anywhere else in the building (other than a garage, kitchen, bathroom or hallway)—40 dB(A) at any time.

 

Plans and specifications of the required acoustic design shall be prepared by a practicing acoustic engineer and shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To minimise the impact of noise from the adjoining road or rail corridor on the occupants of the development.

 

32.   Noise from plant in residential zone

 

Where any form of mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant is proposed as part of the development, prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate the Certifying Authority, shall be satisfied that the operation of an individual piece of equipment or operation of equipment in combination will not exceed more than 5dB(A) above the background level during the day when measured at the site’s boundaries and shall not exceed the background level at night (10.00pm -6.00 am) when measured at the boundary of the site.

 

C1.   Note:    A certificate from an appropriately qualified acoustic engineer is to be submitted with the Construction Certificate, certifying that all mechanical ventilation equipment or other noise generating plant in isolation or in combination with other plant will comply with the above requirements.

 

Reason:         To comply with best practice standards for residential acoustic amenity.

 

33.   Location of plant

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all plant and equipment (including but not limited to air conditioning equipment) is located within the basement.

 

C1.   Note:    Architectural plans identifying the location of all plant and equipment shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To minimise impact on surrounding properties, improved visual appearance and amenity for locality.

 

34.   Driveway grades - basement carparks

 

Prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate, longitudinal driveway sections are to be prepared by a qualified civil/traffic engineer and be submitted for to and approved by the Certifying Authority. These profiles are to be at 1:100 scale along both edges of the proposed driveway, starting from the centreline of the frontage street carriageway to the proposed basement floor level. The traffic engineer shall provide specific written certification on the plans that:

 

·           vehicular access can be obtained using grades of 20% (1 in 5) maximum and

·           all changes in grade (transitions) comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 -“Off-street car parking” (refer clause 2.5.3) to prevent the scraping of the underside of vehicles. 

 

If a new driveway crossing is proposed, the longitudinal sections must incorporate the driveway crossing levels as issued by Council upon prior application.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

35.   Basement car parking details

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, certified parking layout plan(s) to scale showing all aspects of the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements must be submitted to and approved by the Certifying Authority. A qualified civil/traffic engineer must review the proposed vehicle access and accommodation layout and provide written certification on the plans that:

 

·           all parking space dimensions, driveway and aisle widths, driveway grades, transitions, circulation ramps, blind aisle situations and other trafficked areas comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-street car parking”

·           a clear height clearance of 2.6 metres (required for waste collection trucks) is provided over the designated garbage collection truck manoeuvring areas within the basement

-   mirrors are provided at bends where required

-   the correct number of resident parking spaces (17) is to be shown on the plans (one visitor space is to be designated as a resident space and one visitor space is to be converted to a shared zone)

·           no doors or gates are provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection at any time from the basement garbage storage and collection area

·           the dimensions of all parking spaces, including lengths and widths, comply with the State Environmental Planning Policy for Senior Living relating to height clearances and space dimensions

·           the vehicle access and accommodation arrangements are to be constructed and marked in accordance with the certified plans

 

Reason:         To ensure that parking spaces are in accordance with the approved development.

 

36.   Car parking allocation

 

Car parking within the development shall be allocated in the following way:

 

Resident car spaces

17

Visitor spaces

1

Total spaces

18

 

Consideration must be given to the means of access from disabled car parking spaces to other areas within the building and to footpath and roads and shall be clearly shown on the plans submitted with the Construction Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure equity of access and appropriate facilities are available for people with disabilities in accordance with federal legislation.

 

37.   Design of works in public road (Roads Act approval)

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that engineering plans and specifications prepared by a qualified consulting engineer have been approved by Council’s Development Engineer. The plans to be assessed must be to a detail suitable for construction issue purposes and must detail the following infrastructure works required in Ryde Road:

 

Connection of the site stormwater drainage system to the street drainage system by means of a 300mm diameter pipe as shown on AJ Whipps Consulting Drawing HDA04/P4.

 

Development consent does not give approval to these works in the road reserve.  The applicant must obtain a separate approval under sections 138 and 139 of The Roads Act 1993 for the works in the road reserve required as part of the development. The Construction Certificate must not be issued, and these works must not proceed until Council has issued a formal written approval under the Roads Act 1993.

 

The plans will also be referred to Roads and Maritime Services for any special requirements they may have (hours of construction, etc).

 

Note that the alignment of the pipe may need to be changed for reasons of tree protection.  The arborist is to inspect and comment on the plans before they are submitted to Council.

 

The required plans and specifications are to be designed in accordance with the General Specification for the Construction of Road and Drainage Works in Ku-ring-gai Council, dated November 2004. The drawings must detail existing utility services and trees affected by the works, erosion control requirements and traffic management requirements during the course of works.  Survey must be undertaken as required. Traffic management is to be certified on the drawings as being in accordance with the documents SAA HB81.1 - 1996 - Field Guide for Traffic Control at Works on Roads - Part 1 and RTA Traffic Control at Work Sites (1998). Construction of the works must proceed only in accordance with any conditions attached to the Roads Act approval issued by Council.

 

A minimum of three (3) weeks will be required for Council to assess the Roads Act application. Early submission of the Roads Act application is recommended to avoid delays in obtaining a Construction Certificate. An engineering assessment and inspection fee (set out in Council’s adopted fees and charges) is payable and Council will withhold any consent and approved plans until full payment of the correct fees. Plans and specifications must be marked to the attention of Council’s Development Engineers. In addition, a copy of this condition must be provided, together with a covering letter stating the full address of the property and the accompanying DA number.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the plans are suitable for construction purposes.

 

38.   Energy Australia requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must contact Energy Australia regarding power supply for the subject development. A written response detailing the full requirements of Energy Australia (including any need for underground cabling, substations or similar within or in the vicinity the development) shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority for approval prior to issue of the Construction Certificate.

 

Any structures or other requirements of Energy Australia shall be indicated on the plans issued with the Construction Certificate, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority and Energy Australia. The requirements of Energy Australia must be met in full prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of Energy Australia.

 

39.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

40.   Underground services

 

All electrical services (existing and proposed) shall be undergrounded from the proposed building on the site to the appropriate power pole(s) or other connection point. Undergrounding of services must not disturb the root system of existing trees and shall be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the relevant service provided. Documentary evidence that the relevant service provider has been consulted and that their requirements have been met are to be provided to the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All electrical and telephone services to the subject property must be placed underground and any redundant poles are to be removed at the expense of the applicant.

 

Reason:         To provide infrastructure that facilitates the future improvement of the streetscape by relocation of overhead lines below ground.

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

41.   Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee

 

To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

(a)      All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

(b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

(c)      The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

(d)      In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.

 

(e)      In this condition:

 

“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:         To maintain public infrastructure.

 

42.   Section 94 development contributions - other than identified centres

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Infrastructure Type                                                          Total

LGA Wide Local Recreational & Cultural                                           $21,255.78

Southern Area Local Parks & Sporting Facilities                              $152,245.63

Development Contributions Total                                     $173,501.41

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and may vary at the time of payment in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Contributions outside the designated centres may be subject to a maximum contribution total in accordance with the s94E Direction issued by the Minister for Planning dated 21 August 2012, for so long as it remains legally in force.  If the total amount above is an exact multiple of $20,000 then the contributions calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 exceeded the maximum contribution payable and have been capped.  If the process of inflation carries the contribution above over the maximum amount permitted by the s94E Direction prior to payment, the amount will be limited at time of receipt.  Please contact Council to verify the total contributions payable prior to payment.

 

Reason:       To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

43.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

44.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·                 the work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·                 in the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence

·                 if the development involves an excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building, structure or work (including any structure or work within a road or rail corridor) on adjoining land, the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense:

 

(a)      protect and support the building, structure or work from possible damage from the excavation, and

(b)      where necessary, underpin the building, structure or work to prevent any such damage.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement.

 

45.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:    Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

46.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

47.   Engineering fees

 

For the purpose of any development related inspections by Ku-ring-gai Council engineers, the corresponding fees set out in Councils adopted Schedule of Fees and Charges are payable to Council. A re-inspection fee per visit may be charged where work is unprepared at the requested time of inspection, or where remedial work is unsatisfactory and a further inspection is required. Engineering fees must be paid in full prior to any final consent from Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

48.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

49.   Construction noise

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, noise generated from the site shall be controlled in accordance with the recommendations of the approved noise and vibration management plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity to neighbouring properties.

 

50.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·           be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·           display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·           be durable and weatherproof

·           display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·           be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

51.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·           physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·           earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·           all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·           the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·           all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·           all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·           gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·           cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

52.   Further geotechnical input

 

The geotechnical and hydro-geological works implementation, inspection, testing and monitoring program for the excavation and construction works must be in accordance with the report by JK Geotechnics dated 19 April 2016 and the report submitted prior to commencement of works. Over the course of the works, a qualified geotechnical/hydro-geological engineer must complete the following:

 

·           further geotechnical investigations and testing recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary

·           further monitoring and inspection at the hold points recommended in the above report(s) and as determined necessary

·           written report(s) including certification(s) of the geotechnical inspection, testing and monitoring programs

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

53.   Compliance with submitted geotechnical report

 

A contractor with specialist excavation experience must undertake the excavations for the development and a suitably qualified and consulting geotechnical engineer must oversee excavation.

 

Geotechnical aspects of the development work, namely:

 

·           appropriate excavation method and vibration control

·           support and retention of excavated faces

·           hydro-geological considerations

 

must be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by JK Geotechnics dated 19 April 2016 and the report submitted prior to commencement of works. Approval must be obtained from all affected property owners, including Ku-ring-gai Council, where rock anchors (both temporary and permanent) are proposed below adjoining property(ies).

 

Reason:         To ensure the safety and protection of property.

 

54.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

55.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

56.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

57.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

58.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

59.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·           are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·           are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·           are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·           refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·           are restricted to one such sign per property

·           do not exceed 2.5m2

·           are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

60.   Approval for rock anchors

 

Approval is to be obtained from the property owner for any anchors proposed beneath adjoining private property.  If such approval cannot be obtained, then the excavated faces are to be shored or propped in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical and structural engineers.

 

Reason:         To ensure the ongoing safety and protection of property.

 

61.   Maintenance period for works in public road

 

A maintenance period of six (6) months applies to all work in the public road reserve carried out by the applicant - after the works have been completed to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council. In that maintenance period, the applicant shall be liable for any section of the public infrastructure work which fails to perform in the designed manner, or as would reasonably be expected under the operating conditions. The maintenance period shall commence once the applicant receives a formal letter from Council stating that the works involving public infrastructure have been completed satisfactorily.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

 

 

 

62.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

63.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

64.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

The applicant must obtain a Section 73 Compliance Certificate under the Sydney Water Act 1994. An application must be made through an authorised Water Servicing Coordinator. The applicant is to refer to “Your Business” section of Sydney Water’s web site at www.sydneywater.com.au <http://www.sydneywater.com.au> then the “e-develop” icon or telephone 13 20 92. Following application a “Notice of Requirements” will detail water and sewer extensions to be built and charges to be paid. Please make early contact with the Coordinator, since building of water/sewer extensions can be time consuming and may impact on other services and building, driveway or landscape design.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

65.   Arborist’s report

 

The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:

 

 

 

Tree/Location

Time of inspection

All retained trees on site

*Immediately prior (1 week) to the commencement of ANY works on site.

*Certification of tree protection measures in accordance with consent conditions.

*Direct supervision of excavation works within a 6.0m radius of any tree.

*At three monthly intervals during construction.

*At the completion of all works on site.

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

66.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

67.   Cutting of tree roots

 

No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

All existing trees On site and within a 6.0m

setback from site boundaries

Within the identified TPZ within Section 4 of the Tree Assessment and Development Impact Report by Growing My Way Tree Services dated May 2016.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

68.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:

 

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

W20, W21, W22 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine) Centrally located on site

Removal

E18 Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine)

Centrally located on site

Removal

 

Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Development Control Plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

69.   Excavation near trees

 

No mechanical excavation shall be undertaken within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s until root pruning by hand along the perimeter line of such works is completed:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

All existing trees On site and within a 6.0m

setback from site boundaries

Within the identified TPZ within Section 4 of the Tree Assessment and Development Impact Report by Growing My Way Tree Services dated May 2016.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

70.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

All existing trees On site and within a 6.0m

setback from site boundaries

Within the identified TPZ within Section 4 of the Tree Assessment and Development Impact Report by Growing My Way Tree Services dated May 2016.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

71.   Thrust boring

 

Excavation for the installation of any services within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall utilise the thrust boring method.  Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 600mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

All existing trees On site and within a 6.0m

setback from site boundaries

Within the identified TPZ within Section 4 of the Tree Assessment and Development Impact Report by Growing My Way Tree Services dated May 2016.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

72.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

73.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

74.   Canopy replenishment trees to be planted

 

The canopy replenishment trees to be planted shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous condition until they attain a height of 5.0 metres whereby they will be protected by Council’s Tree Preservation Order.  Any of the trees found faulty, damaged, dying or dead shall be replaced with the same species.

 

Reason:         To maintain the treed character of the area.

 

75.   Survey and inspection of waste collection clearance and path of travel

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, a registered surveyor is to:

 

·           ascertain the reduced level of the underside of the slab at the driveway entry,

·           certify that the level is not lower than the level shown on the approved DA plans; and

·           certify that the minimum headroom of 2.6 metres will be available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.

·           This certification is to be provided to Council’s Development Engineer prior to any concrete being poured for the ground floor slab.

·           No work is to proceed until Council has undertaken an inspection to determine clearance and path of travel.

 

At the stage when formwork for the ground floor slab is in place and prior to concrete being poured, Council’s Development Engineer and Manager Waste Services are to carry out an inspection of the site to confirm the clearance available for the full path of travel of the small waste collection vehicle from the street to the collection area.  This inspection may not be carried out by a private certifier because waste management is not a matter listed in Clause 161 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

 

Reason:       To ensure access will be available for Council’s contractors to collect waste from the collection point.

 

76.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·           Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·           This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

77.   Easement for waste collection

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that an easement for waste collection has been created under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919.  The terms of the easement are to be generally in accordance with Council's draft terms for an easement for waste collection and shall be to the satisfaction of Council's Development Engineer.

 

Reason:       To permit legal access for Council, Council's contractors and their vehicles over the subject site for waste collection.

 

78.   Compliance with BASIX Certificate

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate No. 730664M_04 have been complied with.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

79.   Clotheslines and clothes dryers

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the units either have access to an external clothes line located in common open space or have a mechanical clothes dryer installed.

 

Reason:         To provide access to clothes drying facilities.

 

80.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Following completion, installation and testing of all the mechanical ventilation systems, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied of the following prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate:

 

1.         The installation and performance of the mechanical systems complies with:

 

·      The Building Code of Australia

·      Australian Standard AS1668

·      Australian Standard AS3666 where applicable

 

2.         The mechanical ventilation system in isolation and in association with other mechanical ventilation equipment, when in operation will not be audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays. The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest adjoining boundary.

 

Note:    Written confirmation from an acoustic engineer that the development achieves the above requirements is to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

81.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

82.   Accessibility

 

Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that:

 

·           the lift design and associated functions are compliant with AS 1735.12 & AS 1428.2

·           the level and direction of travel, both in lifts and lift lobbies, is audible and visible

·           the controls for lifts are accessible to all persons and control buttons and lettering are raised

·           international symbols have been used with specifications relating to signs, symbols and size of lettering complying with AS 1428.2

·           the height of lettering on signage is in accordance with AS 1428.1 – 1993

·           the signs and other information indicating access and services incorporate tactile communication methods in addition to the visual methods

 

Reason:         Disabled access & services.

 

83.   Retention and re-use positive covenant

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the property with the requirement to maintain the site stormwater retention and re-use facilities on the property.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instruments for protection of retention and re-use facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Part 24R.8 of Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the reuse and retention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents showing the covenants and restrictions must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

84.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·           the stormwater drainage works have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans

·           the minimum retention and on-site detention storage volume requirements of Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan have been achieved

·           retained water is connected and available for use (toilet flushing and irrigation)

·           all grates potentially accessible by children are secured

·           components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed plumbing contractor in accordance with the Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 2003 and the Building Code of Australia

·           all enclosed floor areas, including habitable and garage floor levels, are safeguarded from outside stormwater runoff ingress by suitable differences in finished levels, gradings and provision of stormwater collection devices

 

Note:    Evidence from a qualified and experienced consulting civil/hydraulic engineer documenting compliance with the above is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

85.   WAE plans for stormwater management and disposal

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, a registered surveyor must provide a works as executed survey of the completed stormwater drainage and management systems. The survey must be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate. The survey must indicate:

 

·           as built (reduced) surface and invert levels for all drainage pits

·           gradients of drainage lines, materials and dimensions

·           as built (reduced) level(s) at the approved point of discharge to the public drainage system

·           as built location and internal dimensions of all detention and retention structures on the property (in plan view) and horizontal distances to nearest adjacent boundaries and structures on site

·           the achieved storage volumes of the installed retention and detention storages and derivative calculations

·           as built locations of all access pits and grates in the detention and retention system(s), including dimensions

·           the size of the orifice or control fitted to any on-site detention system

·           dimensions of the discharge control pit and access grates

·           the maximum depth of storage possible over the outlet control

·           top water levels of storage areas and indicative RL’s through the overland flow path in the event of blockage of the on-site detention system

 

The works as executed plan(s) must show the as built details above in comparison to those shown on the drainage plans approved with the Construction Certificate prior to commencement of works. All relevant levels and details indicated must be marked in red on a copy of the Principal Certifying Authority stamped construction certificate stormwater plans.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

86.   OSD positive covenant/restriction

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the applicant must create a positive covenant and restriction on the use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the owner with the requirement to maintain the on-site stormwater detention facilities on the lot.

 

The terms of the instruments are to be generally in accordance with the Council's "draft terms of Section 88B instrument for protection of on-site detention facilities" and to the satisfaction of Council (refer to Part 24R.8 of Ku-ring-gai DCP). For existing titles, the positive covenant and the restriction on the use of land is to be created through an application to the Land Titles Office in the form of a request using forms 13PC and 13RPA. The relative location of the on-site detention facility, in relation to the building footprint, must be shown on a scale sketch, attached as an annexure to the request forms.

 

Registered title documents, showing the covenants and restrictions, must be submitted and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

87.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate the Section 73 Sydney water Compliance Certificate must be obtained and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

88.   Certification of as-constructed driveway/carpark

 

Prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·          the as-constructed car park complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans

 

·          the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking" and the Seniors Living State Environment Planning Policy in terms of minimum parking space dimensions

 

·          finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars

 

·          no doors, gates, grilles or other structures have been provided in the access driveways to the basement carpark, which would prevent unrestricted access for internal garbage collection from the basement garbage storage and collection area

 

·          the vehicular headroom requirements of:

-   Australian Standard 2890.1 - “Off-street car parking”,

-   The Seniors Living SEPP (as last amended) for accessible parking spaces,

-   2.6 metres height clearance for waste collection trucks are met from the public street into and within the applicable areas of the basement carpark.

 

Note:    Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.

 

89.   Construction of works in public road - approved plans

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that all approved road, footpath and/or drainage works have been completed in the road reserve in accordance with the Council Roads Act approval and accompanying drawings, conditions and specifications.

 

The works must be supervised by the applicant’s designing engineer and completed and approved to the satisfaction of Ku-ring-gai Council and Roads and Maritime Services where required.

 

The supervising consulting engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved stamped drawings.  The works must be subject to inspections by Council at the hold points noted on the Roads Act approval.  All conditions attached to the approved drawings for these works must be met prior to the Occupation Certificate being issued. 

 

Reason:         To ensure that works undertaken in the road reserve are to the satisfaction of Council.

 

90.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

91.   Mechanical ventilation

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that all mechanical ventilation systems are installed in accordance with Part F4.5 of the Building Code of Australia and comply with Australian Standards AS1668.2 and AS3666 Microbial Control of Air Handling and Water Systems of Building.

 

Reason:         To ensure adequate levels of health and amenity to the occupants of the building.

 

92.   Fire safety certificate

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a Fire Safety Certificate for all the essential fire or other safety measures forming part of this consent has been completed and provided to Council.

 

Note:    A copy of the Fire Safety Certificate must be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         To ensure suitable fire safety measures are in place.

 

93.   Restriction on land title – SEPP Seniors Living development

 

Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that restriction as to use of land under Section 88E of the Conveyancing Act 1919, has been created restricting the occupation of the premises to:

 

·           people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·           people who live with people 55 or over or people who have a disability

·           staff employed to assist in the administration of and provision of services to housing provided in this development

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

94.   SEPP Seniors Living advertising

 

All advertising, signage, marketing or promotion of the sale of the dwellings in this development shall make clear reference to the fact that this is a SEPP Seniors Living development and that at least one occupier shall be aged 55 years or over or have a disability.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

95.   Construction standards - Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability

 

Prior to the issue of an occupation certificate or occupation of the development (whichever comes first), certification shall be provided from an accredited access consultant to the certifying authority which demonstrates that the fit out and construction of the development satisfies the design criteria in Schedule 3 of SEPP (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development meets the provisions of the Seniors Living SEPP.

 

Conditions to be satisfied at all times:

 

96.   Annual fire safety statement

Each 12 months after the installation of essential fire or other safety measures, an Annual Fire Safety Statement for the building must be provided to Council. In addition a copy of the statement must be given to the NSW Fire Commissioner and displayed prominently in the building.

 

Reason:       To ensure statutory maintenance of essential fire safety measures.

 

97.   Outdoor lighting

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, all outdoor lighting shall not detrimentally impact upon the amenity of other premises and adjacent dwellings and shall comply with, where relevant, AS/NZ1158.3: 2005 Pedestrian Area (Category P) Lighting and AS4282: 1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding properties.

 

98.   Encroachment over burdens

 

At all times for the life of the approved development, no part of any structure shall encroach over any easement and no loadings shall be imposed to utilities within any easement unless approved by the owner(s) appurtenant to the burden.

 

This development consent does not set aside or affect in any way the exercise of any rights-at-law which may be conferred upon any parties by the existence and/or terms of the grant of any easements or rights-of-carriageway on or over the subject lot(s). It is the applicant’s full responsibility to ensure that any rights-at-law are investigated and upheld. Council accepts no responsibility whatsoever, at any time, for any claim for any matter or thing arising from its approval to this application involving any encroachment or other influence upon any easement or right-of-carriageway. 

 

The applicant’s attention is directed to the rights of persons benefited by any easement or right-of-carriageway concerning the entry and breaking up of a structure approved by this consent. In the event that such a structure causes damage, blockage or other thing requiring maintenance to infrastructure within the easement or right-of-carriageway, or access is required to carry out maintenance, Council accepts no responsibility in this regard.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the development consent.

 

99.   No door restricting internal waste collection in basement

 

At all times, the basement garbage storage and collection area is to be accessible by Council’s Waste Collection Services. No doors, grilles, gates or other devices shall be provided in any location which would prevent this service. Where a gate, door or the like is to be erected, unimpeded access to the garbage collection point is to be provided by other means through written agreement with Council’s Waste Collection Services.

 

Reason:         To facilitate access to the garbage collection point.

 

100. Noise control – plant and machinery

 

All noise generating equipment associated with any proposed mechanical ventilation system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the unit outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:         To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

101. Noise control - rainwater re-use system

 

All noise generating equipment, such as pumps, associated with any proposed rainwater re-use system/s shall be located and/or soundproofed so the equipment is not audible within a habitable room in any other residential premises before 7am and after 10pm Monday to Friday and before 8am and after 10pm Saturday, Sunday and public holidays.  The operation of the pump/s outside these restricted hours shall emit a noise level of not greater than 5dbA above the background when measured at the nearest boundary.

 

Reason:       To protect the amenity of surrounding residents.

 

102. Loading and unloading

 

At all times, all loading and unloading of service vehicles in connection with the use of the premises shall be carried out wholly within the site.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe traffic movement.

 

103. Unobstructed driveways and parking areas

 

At all times, all driveways and parking areas shall be unobstructed. Driveways and car spaces shall not be used for the manufacture, storage or display of goods, materials or any other equipment and shall be used solely for vehicular access and for the parking of vehicles associated with the use of the premises.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe traffic movement.

 

INTEGRATED REFERRAL CONDITIONS:

 

104. Rural Fire Service requirements

 

a)     Asset protection zones

 

The intent of measures is to provide sufficient space and maintain reduced fuel loads so as to ensure radiant heat levels of buildings are below critical limits and to prevent direct flame contact with a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

          At the commencement of building works and in perpetuity, the entire property shall be managed as an inner protection area (IPA) as outlined within section 4.1.3 and Appendix 5 of ‘Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006’ and the NSW Rural Fire Service's document 'Standards for asset protection zones'.

 

b)     Water and utilities

 

The intent of measures is to provide adequate services of water for the protection of buildings during and after the passage of a bush fire, and to locate gas and electricity so as not to contribute to the risk of fire to a building. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

          Water, electricity and gas shall comply with section 4.2.7 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.

 

c)     Access

 

The intent of measures for internal roads is to provide safe operational access for emergency services personnel in suppressing a bush fire, while residents are accessing or egressing an area. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

          Unobstructed pedestrian access should be provided to the rear of the property to aid in fire-fighting activities.

 

d)     Evacuation and emergency management

 

The intent of measures is to provide suitable emergency and evacuation (and relocation) arrangements for occupants of special fire protection purpose developments. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

          An Emergency /Evacuation Plan shall be prepared consistent with section 4.2.7 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.

 

e)     Design and construction

 

The intent of measures is that buildings are designed and constructed to withstand the potential impacts of bush fire attack. To achieve this, the following conditions shall apply:

 

          New construction shall comply with Australian Standard AS3959-2009 'Construction of buildings in bush fire-prone areas' section 3 and section 5 (BAL 12.5) and section A3.7 of Addendum Appendix 3 of ‘Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006’.

 

f)     Landscaping

 

          Landscaping to the site is to comply with the principles of Appendix 5 of 'Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006'.

 

Reason:       Bush fire protection.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joshua Daniel

Executive Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Shaun Garland

Team Leader Development Assessment Central

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Location sketch

 

2017/170473

 

A2

Zoning extract

 

2017/170476

 

A3

Site survey

 

2016/158189

 

A4

Architectural plans

 

2017/183600

 

A5

Landscape plans

 

2017/061648

 

A6

Vegetation management plan

 

2017/179645

 

A7

Cl. 4.6 Request to vary development standard - number of storeys

 

2016/323465

 

A8

Cl. 4.6 Request to vary development standard - 8m height

 

2016/323464

 

A9

Axonometric sections - 8m height plane

 

2017/179733

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.5 / 178

 

 

Item GB.5

CY00413/5

 

3 July 2017

 

 

Minutes of the Heritage Reference Committee

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

Council to consider the minutes of the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) meetings held on 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017.

 

 

background:

The minutes taken at the meetings held on 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017 were confirmed and accepted at the Heritage Reference Committee meeting held on 28 June 2017.

 

 

comments:

A number of issues regarding heritage items and policies were discussed at the Heritage Reference Committee’s meetings on 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council receives and notes the Heritage Reference Committee meeting minutes from 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

Council to consider the minutes of the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) meetings held on 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017.

 

Background

The Ku-ring-gai Heritage Reference Committee was reformed in August 2014 in accordance with the Council’s requirements.

 

Comments

A range of heritage issues were discussed at the Heritage Reference Committee meeting of 13 October 2016 (please see Attachment A1). Staff gave the committee an update on heritage conservation area reviews and interim heritage orders and discussed current projects including the Heritage Walk App and possible community education sessions on heritage and sustainability.

 

At the meeting of 16 February 2017 (please see Attachment A2) Jennifer Hill from the consultancy Architectural Projects addressed the Committee regarding a request to delist 5 Womerah Street, Turramurra.

 

A new community committee member, Joanne Martens, joined the committee meeting of 27 April 2017 (please see Attachment A3).  The Committee discussed the requests for delisting of 5 Womerah Street Turramurra and 16 Kintore Street, Wahroonga. The Committee resolved the following:

 

The arguments for delisting 16 Kintore Street Wahroonga are not accepted and no substantive case for delisting has been made and it should remain a heritage item.

 

And

 

Having heard the argument for delisting the house at 5 Womerah Street Turramurra it is the view of the Committee it is a work by Professor Wilkinson, notwithstanding it is an overwork, it is a significant work and should remain a heritage item.

 

Adopted unanimous.

 

integrated planning and reporting

Heritage Conservation

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively protect and preserve Ku-ring-gai’s heritage assets

Implement, monitor and review Ku-ring-gai’s heritage planning provisions.

 

Identify gaps in existing strategies and plans.

 

 

Governance Matters

Consisting of six members, the Heritage Reference Committee includes Councillors and heritage practitioners.

The Committee provides advice on heritage matters and assists with the promotion, understanding and appreciation of heritage. While not a decision-making body, the Committee nevertheless plays an important function in shaping Ku-ring-gai's future. This Committee is also an important link in Council's communication strategy with the community.

 

Risk Management

In providing advice and recommendations to Council on the management of strategic heritage issues in Ku-ring-gai, this Committee assists in the future management of Ku-ring-gai’s cultural heritage.

 

Financial Considerations

The costs of running the Heritage Reference Committee are covered by the Strategy and Environment Department’s budget.

 

Social Considerations

The aims of the Heritage Reference Committee are to provide advice to Council on heritage matters and to provide assistance to Council in promoting an understanding and appreciation of heritage, including matters of social heritage significance.

 

Environmental Considerations

A role of the Heritage Reference Committee is to support Council in identifying and managing Ku‑ring-gai’s Cultural Heritage.

 

Community Consultation

The Heritage Reference Committee meets on a monthly basis and notification of meetings is provided on Council’s website

 

Internal Consultation

The Heritage Reference Committee includes Councillors and heritage practitioners and is facilitated by Council staff. Where relevant, consultation with other Departments may occur in particular with Council’s heritage advisors in Development Assessment.

 

Summary

The Heritage Reference Committee held meetings on 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017. The Heritage Reference Committee adopted two resolutions that 5 Womerah Street Turramurra and 16 Kintore Street Wahroonga should remain as heritage items.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council receives and notes the Heritage Reference Committee Meeting Minutes of 13 October 2016, 16 February 2017 and 27 April 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andreana Kennedy

Heritage Specialist Planner

 

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Adopted Minutes - Heritage Reference Committee - 13 October 2016

 

2017/180319

 

A2

Adopted Minutes - Heritage Reference Committee - 16 February 2017

 

2017/180317

 

A3

Adopted Minutes - Heritage Reference Committee - 28 April 2017

 

2017/180316

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.6 / 182

 

 

Item GB.6

S06785/3

 

28 June 2017

 

 

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 - Amendment to Gordon-Killara Catchment Map

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To update the catchment mapping in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect the recommended zoning and development potential.

 

 

background:

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 provides for the higher density redevelopment in the Pacific Highway / Railway Corridor and in St Ives and for smaller scale development outside these higher density zones.

 

 

comments:

While the Contributions Plan has been in operation, there have been some consequential amendments to the catchment mapping. To ensure that the catchments are reflective of the development potential permitted by the zoning, another amendment is now required.

 

 

recommendation:

That the amended contributions catchment mapping be placed on statutory exhibition for a minimum of 28 days and that a report be returned to Council after the close of exhibition.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To update the catchment mapping in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect the recommended zoning and development potential.

 

Background

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 was an amalgamation and refinement of two predecessor Contributions Plans known as the Ku-ring-gai Section 94 Contributions Plan 2004-2009 Amendment Two and the Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Contributions Plan 2008.  It subsumed these contributions plans and therefore covers the whole of the then envisaged redevelopment phase from 2004 to 2031.  It provides for infrastructure to support intensive redevelopment in the Pacific Highway / Railway Corridor and in St Ives and smaller scale development outside these higher density zones. 

 

Assessed as part of a NSW Government Review of Development Contributions Plans in 2009, Ku‑ring-gai’s Contributions Plan (and its predecessors) was considered to be ‘grandfathered’ meaning that it was permitted a partial exemption from the threshold or ‘cap’ of $20,000 per dwelling authorised by any affected consent that was applied from 2009 and continues to apply in most urban areas.  The s94E Direction also limits the contributions outside of the identified local centres as mapped in the Contributions Plan in Ku-ring-gai, but the identified areas within the Local Centres are exempt from limitation under that s94E Direction.

 

Comments

Over the period that the Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 has been in operation, there have been some past consequential amendments to the catchment mapping to ensure that the catchments are reflective of zoning development potential to match infrastructure funding with the development that gives rise to that demand.  Another minor amendment is now required.

 

The current contributions plan will commence a major review phase parallel to the on-going release of data from the 2016 census.  Basic Community Profile Information was released on Tuesday, 27 June 2017 but further releases including workforce data and journey-to-work data will continue to be released over 2017/2018.  The major review process will also take place in association with other strategic planning processes as part of the work of the Greater Sydney Commission, as more detail of those proposals becomes known.  However this will be a very extensive review and will take many months to complete. 

 

The amendment to the catchment map that is the subject of this report cannot await the completion of that process.

 

Planning Proposal for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue Killara

 

At the last OMC of 27 June 2017, Council endorsed the Planning Proposal to rezone the former heritage property at 21 Lorne Avenue Killara from R2 Low Density Residential to R4 High Density Residential and to proceed under delegated authority as follows:

 

A.   That Council adopts the Planning Proposal for the rezoning of 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara;

 

B.   That Councils proceeds to make the Plan, under delegated authority issued by the Department of Planning and Environment under Section 59(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979;

 

C.   That those who made submissions be notified of Council’s decision.

 

This rezoning will enable it to become part of the consolidated redevelopment site together with adjoining properties that are already zoned R4 High Density Residential.

 

 

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 levies different contributions from higher density redevelopment located in the Pacific Highway / Northern Railway corridor and St Ives to support the provision of additional infrastructure in the centres that supports this intensive redevelopment.  As part of the case made to the NSW Government in 2009, these local centres received an exemption from the financial restriction that would otherwise have been placed on these development contributions.  Such a limit would have severely compromised infrastructure delivery that was already committed and Council was able to demonstrate that redevelopment activity was on-going and not being quashed by the higher contributions in the centres.

 

These differential contributions and the exemption under the s94E Direction only apply to redevelopment sites, such as R3 and R4 zones (and the former 2(d3) zones under the KPSO) and do not apply to lower density areas such as R2 and E4 zones.  The result of that policy situation is that 21 Lorne Avenue Killara, being currently zoned R2, is not shown coloured on the relevant catchment map in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010. 

 

That situation will create considerable difficulties when 21 Lorne Avenue, Killara becomes part of a consolidated redevelopment site with a single development application.  It needs correcting urgently as a Development Application might be lodged at any time after the gazettal of the rezoning.  Any mapping amendments to an adopted and in effect Contributions Plan require a formal exhibition process with a statutory minimum of 28 days.

 

The current and draft proposed catchment maps being Figure 1.4 Pacific Highway: Gordon-Killara are attached at Attachment A1 and Attachment A2 respectively.

 

It is recommended that the proposed amendment to update the catchment map Figure 1.4 Pacific Highway: Gordon-Killara to reflect the imminent R4 zoning of 21 Lorne Avenue Killara be placed on statutory exhibition and a report be returned to the Council after the close of exhibition.

 

integrated planning and reporting

Theme Three: Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai.

Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development.

P8.1.1.1.1.1-2

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan

2010 ensures new development contributes towards the cost of delivering supporting infrastructure.

 

Governance Matters

The proposed contributions catchment mapping update will accurately reflect development potential by addressing a spot rezoning in a timely manner.

 

Risk Management

The catchment mapping in the Contributions Plan needs to fairly reflect its original intentions in respect of the equitable distribution of infrastructure funding to those developments giving rise to the demand.  Not doing so undermines the integrity of the Contributions Plan over time and introduces a risk that need not exist.

 

In the particular case of 21 Lorne Avenue Killara, the subject property has been recently recommended for rezoning and is expected to be ultimately incorporated into a redevelopment site with other properties that are already zoned for higher density development. 

 

That means that most of that future consolidated redevelopment site is already inside the Local Centres Catchment of Gordon-Killara. As such these sites – with the exception of 21 Lorne Avenue – are currently subject to four categories of contributions which are exempted from the s94E Direction that limits contributions outside the centres.  By comparison 21 Lorne Avenue, currently remains excluded from that catchment, subject to only two of those categories and technically subject to the limit imposed by the s94E Direction.  It is not appropriate to have one development application for a future consolidated site to be located in two catchment areas as well as theoretically partially capped and partially uncapped.  This would result in an effectively unmanageable situation and must be corrected as a matter of urgency. 

 

Financial Considerations

The intention of the Contributions Plan has always been to include all the areas capable of concentrated intensive redevelopment along the Pacific Highway / Northern Railway corridor and in St Ives within the local centres catchments to ensure that all such developments equitably share the cost of the infrastructure required cumulatively and collectively as part of that concentrated intensive redevelopment.  The capability for intensive redevelopment is determined primarily by the zoning and location although at least one later downzoned ‘Ministers’ Site’ in Avon Road Pymble which achieves higher density under the former Part 3A is also included along with comparable sites.

 

Over time, spot rezonings require amendments to the catchment maps to ensure equity between all sites capable of higher density redevelopment.  The current report proposes the exhibition of such an amendment.  These sites represent proportionally minor additions to the anticipated income from the Contributions Plan and are easily incorporated within the budget of the major projects as they enter into their delivery phases and are not considered to impact on the fundamentals of the infrastructure funding strategy.

 

Social Considerations

The delivery of physical and social infrastructure to support intensive redevelopment in the local centres is critical to the future social fabric of these rapidly changing areas of Ku-ring-gai.

 

Environmental Considerations

There are no additional environmental considerations triggered by updating existing catchment maps in the highly urbanised local centres to represent existing zoning.  The environmental considerations formed part of the original decision to rezone the land in question.

 

Community Consultation

This report recommends the commencement of the 28 day statutory exhibition period of the proposed catchment mapping update.

 

Internal Consultation

Internal consultation has occurred where relevant to this matter.

 

Summary

It is imperative to address the potential redevelopment of 21 Lorne Avenue as part of a larger redevelopment site together with its immediate neighbours by ensuring the entire redevelopment site is placed wholly within the Gordon-Killara catchment of Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, rather than only part of it as is the current situation.  This will also enable the Department of Planning and Infrastructure to properly address the references in the exemption schedule of the s94E Direction at its next revision.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That the draft amendment to update the catchment map for Gordon-Killara to reflect the current zoning and development potential of 21 Lorne Avenue Killara be placed on statutory exhibition and a report be returned to the Council after the close of exhibition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kate Paterson

Infrastructure Co-ordinator

 

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 - Current Gordon-Killara Catchment Map

 

2017/178087

 

A2

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 - Draft Revised Gordon-Killara Catchment Map

 

2017/178082

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.7 / 188

 

 

Item GB.7

S10973-14

 

16 June 2017

 

 

Lindfield Community Hub - RFT 12/2017 - Legal Services Tender

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the tenders received for the engagement of a Legal Firm to provide legal advice and services throughout the procurement phase of the Lindfield Community Hub project (the Project).

 

 

 

background:

At the Ordinary Meeting of Council of 23 May 2017 Council resolved to proceed with the procurement and delivery of the Lindfield Community Hub project in accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 and not to proceed with a PPP as described in 400C of the Act.

Council undertook a detailed evaluation of alternative procurement and delivery options for the Project. Based on the complex nature of the integrated public/private mixed-use project and the contractual complexity from both a commercial and construction perspective, Council is seeking to appoint an appropriately qualified and experienced legal advisor to provide services throughout the project’s procurement phase.

Tenderer documents were prepared as a Selective Tender, clearly articulating the assessment criteria, project parameters, scope of services and tasks required.

 

 

 

 

comments:

Tender documents were produced with three (3) submissions received. The submissions were assessed using the agreed assessment criteria and assessment weightings, which related to value for money for Council, personnel and firm qualifications /experience / time allocation and task based methodology.

This report seeks Council consent to engage the recommended legal services firm to provide legal services and advice up to achieving financial close for the project.

 

 

 

 

recommendation:

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 it is recommended that Council accept the tender submitted by Tenderer ‘1’.

 

 

 


Purpose of Report

To consider the tenders received for the engagement of a Legal Firm to provide legal advice and services throughout the procurement phase of the Lindfield Community Hub project (the Project).

 

Background

Ordinary Meeting of Council 23 May 2017 C.1 - Lindfield Community Hub – Legal Advice for Procurement and Delivery Options

 

At this meeting a confidential report was presented to Council to proceed with the Lindfield Community Hub Project under Section 55 of the Local Government Act. The decision was based on specific legal advice obtained which was frames on revised Project parameters.

 

At the meeting, Council resolved as follows:

 

A.    Council resolves to proceed with procurement and delivery of the Lindfield Community Hub project in accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 and not to proceed with a PPP as described in 400C of the Local Government Act 1993;

 

B.    Council resolves to notify the OLG of its decision to proceed with procurement and delivery of the Lindfield Community Hub project in accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 and not to proceed with a PPP as described in 400C of the Local Government Act 1993and provide a rational for the change

 

On 6 June 2017 Council nominated to call for tender submissions for the procurement of Legal Services in accordance with section 55 (4) (b) of the LG Act. Given the extensive scope of services and engagement timetable spanning over a 12 month period, it is anticipated that the tender fees will exceed the $150,000 tender threshold.

 

The successful tenderer will provide independent legal advice and services from the date of commencement of engagement mandate, through EOI/Tender of a preferred Delivery Partners until the Project achieves financial close, including undertaking the drafting of all relevant contracts, leases and related documents throughout the Project’s procurement of a project Delivery Partner.

 

Council sought responses from selective tenderers that have satisfied the selection criteria. The selection criteria was predicated on legal firms having been successfully pre-qualified and subsequently listed as a Panel Firm on the Whole-of-Government NSW Legal Services Panel within the Sub-Panel 1 Major Transactions and nominated for all five (5) of the sub-categories, these being:

 

a)   Major Infrastructure Projects;

b)   Construction;

c)   Major commercial matters (including complex services and ICT contracts);

d)   PPPs and associated transactions; and

e)   Dispute resolution.

 

The rationale for the selection criteria requiring all five of the sub-categories considers the complexity of the integrated public/private mixed-use Project and its on-going operations.

Furthermore, the scale (circa $150m) and contractual complexity, from both a commercial and construction perspective, (and incorporating the background to the structural nature of the Project which has history of PPP and / or associated transaction elements) demands Council receives appropriately qualified advice. Whilst not desirable, the potential for dispute resolution in such a complex and large-scale project further requires an appropriately qualified legal firm.

 

The documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 6 June 2017 and submissions for the tender closed on 27 June 2017.

 

Comments

Three (3) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy and included submissions from the following firms:

 

·     Minter Ellison;

·     Henry David York; and

·     Herbert Smith Freehills.

 

It should be noted that the order of tenderers does not correspond to the order of the list of tenderers names from ‘1’ to ‘3’ in the list of tenders received.

 

A Tender Evaluation Committee (TEC) consisting of staff from the Corporate and Strategy & Environment Departments was formed to assess the three (3) tenders received. The evaluation took into account:

 

·     conformity of submissions;

·     fee cap for two separate delivery options;

·     fee cap by task stage;

·     hourly rates for each nominated project personal;

·     percentage of Partners time;

·     personnel qualifications and experience of Project in similar size, complexity, mixed-use nature with Local Government;

·     Firms experience of Project in similar size & complexity that delivered integrated public/private infrastructure and assets;

·     delivery methodology; and

·     timetable and use of resources.

 

Taking into account all three (3) submissions received and the ‘Further Information Requested’ from two of the three tenderers during the evaluation and scoring of each element of the assessment, Tenderer ‘1’ was identified as providing the best value to Council.

 

Tender ‘1’ provided a superior submission, clearly demonstrating that both the whole of firm and each nominated Project personnel hold relevant experience in working with local government, on complex mixed-use development that delivered public/private facilities with quality operational outcomes.  Tender ‘1’ financial offer was considered by TEC to provide value for money as the fee cap which was calculated using hourly rates and staging caps, demonstrating value for money in regards to the delivery methodology, timetable and use of resources.

 

integrated planning and reporting

Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P4.1.1

A range of well planned, clean and safe neighbourhoods and public spaces designed with a strong sense of identity and place.

 

 

Plans to revitalise local centres are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community

 

 

Continue to engage with key community stakeholders and internal stakeholders to identify the requirements for new community facilities and infrastructure.

 

Finalise the reclassification of identified lands as resolved by Council.

 

Continue to implement a place management approach and innovative engagement practices to coordinate works and achieve quality outcomes for improvements in local centres

P4.1.4

An improvement plan for Lindfield centre is being progressively implemented in collaboration with owners, businesses and state agencies

 

The Master Plan for the Lindfield centre and surrounding precincts is implemented.

 

Progress delivery of the Lindfield Community Hub

C4.1.2

New and enhanced open space and recreational facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment

 

Continue to deliver the objectives of Council’s Open Space Strategy and Open Space Acquisition Strategy.

 

Complete the design for identified parks and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities.

 

Governance Matters

Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 6 June 2017 with a closing date of 27 June 2017. At the close of tender three (3) submissions were received. All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy and in accordance with section 55 (4) (b) of the LG Act.

 

Confidential attachments to this report incorporate the list of tenders received, the tender Evaluation Committee’s weighted scorecard (Confidential Attachment A1) and the Tender Evaluation Committee Report (Confidential Attachment A2). The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A of the Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to be commercial in confidential information.

In accordance with the Project’s Probity Management Plan, the Project’s Tender Review Committee (TRC) reviewed all related tender documentation prepared by the Project Team for consideration and approval by the TRC, including:

 

-     Evaluation Criteria and Scorecard;

-     Evaluation Plan;

-     TenderLink Advertisement;

-     RFT 12-2017 - Legal Services for Lindfield Community Hub;

-     RFT 12-2017 – Returnable Schedules; and

-     Memo to TRC - RFT 12-2017 legal services for Lindfield Community Hub.

 

Each member of the TRC was asked to consider the rationale provided in the memo to the TRC, along with advice received from the Project Probity Advisors OCM, and confirm that the selective tender could proceed. In doing so, the TRC also ratified that all tender documentation was acceptable for release on TenderLink.

 

The Tender Evaluation Committee (TEC) process of tender evaluation was then overseen by Council’s Manager, Procurement and Contracts.

 

Risk Management

A Lindfield Community Hub Risk Management Plan (RMP) has been prepared using the standards and procedures set out in AS/NZ ISO 31000:2009 – Risk Management – Principals and Guidelines. The document provides a framework for the effective management of all levels of risk associated with the Lindfield Community Hub Project.

 

However, Council officers have deemed it necessary to re-evaluate the Risk Assessment (RA) and RMP giving due consideration to the alternative delivery options. The Project delivery team, Council’s responsible Risk Officer and the Project’s Financial Capacity and Commercial Structure PAG have collaboratively revised these documents to identify, evaluate and incorporate a risk within the context of the updated Project parameters.

 

Many of the risks and consequences identified in the RA, have nominated control treatments which rely on the expertise of suitably qualified legal firm. Failure to appoint such a firm would result in Council staff being unable to implement the risk mitigation and control treatments identified within the Risk Management Plan.

 

Financial Considerations

There are no direct financial considerations arising from this report, aside from the sum of the tender if awarded which will be fully funded from the project budget.

 

Social Considerations

There are no direct social considerations arising from this report.

 

Environmental Considerations

There are no direct environmental considerations arising from this report.

 

Community Consultation

Community consultation is not required for the preparation of this report, as the adopted concept Masterplan has not been materially affected.

 

Internal Consultation

A Tender Review Committee (TRC) has been established for the Project as described in the Lindfield Probity Plan. The TRC has met on multiple occasions regarding the tender for Project legal services. 

 

The TRC oversaw the formation of a Tender Evaluation Committee to manage the tender process and provide a recommendation for the preferred legal services provider via a Tender Evaluation Report. The TRC ultimately reviewed, considered and endorsed the recommendation of the TEC.

 

The Financial Capacity & Commercial Structure PAG endorsed scope of services required to be delivered by the successful tenderer.

 

Summary

In preparation for the Project’s EOI phase of the project delivery and procurement process, incorporating legal advice on relevant aspect of the EOI documents, Council requires the appointment of an appropriately qualified legal services firm, who will provide legal advice and services and advice to support the successful appointment of a preferred Delivery Partner, all the way through to financial close of the Project.

 

Tender documents were prepared and released in accordance with section 55 of LG Act and associated Guidelines, as well as under the Project’s probity and process guidelines, incorporating a Tender Review Committee and Tender Evaluation Committee oversight.

 

Taking into account all three (3) submissions received and the ‘Further Information Requested’ from two of the three tenderers during the evaluation and scoring of each element of the assessment, Tenderer ‘1’ was identified as providing the best value to Council.

 

Tender ‘1’ provided a superior submission, clearly demonstrating that both the whole of firm and each nominated Project personnel hold relevant experience in working with local government, on complex mixed-use development that delivered public/private facilities with quality operational outcomes. 

 

Tender ‘1’ financial offer was considered by TEC to provide value for money as the fee cap which was calculated using hourly rates and staging caps, demonstrating value for money in regards to the delivery methodology, timetable and use of resources.

 

It is the recommendation of the Tender Evaluation Committee that Tenderer ‘1’ be appointed on the basis of providing the best value to Council.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council accepts the tender submission from Tenderer ‘1’ to provide external legal advice and services the Procurement and Delivery phase of the Lindfield Community Hub project.

 

B.   That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.

 

C.   That the Seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.

 

D.   That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nicole Gerschel

Project Leader - Major Projects

 

 

 

 

Adam Cougle

Major Projects Consultant

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Tenderer Weighted Scorecard - Summary Results

 

Confidential

 

A2

Tender Evaluation Report

 

Confidential

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

GB.8 / 195

 

 

Item GB.8

CY00066/9

 

10 July 2017

 

 

Modication of Existing Easement -
47 Carbeen Avenue St Ives

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider a request to relocate Council’s stormwater infrastructure and extinguish an existing Council drainage easement (Dealing G549181) over 47 Carbeen Avenue, St Ives.

 

 

background:

On 9 November 2016, Council received an application to consider a request for the relocation of Council’s stormwater drainage infrastructure and modification of the associated easement in the rear yard 47 Carbeen Avenue, St Ives.

 

 

comments:

The easement application is in accordance with Council’s adopted Easement Management Policy 2013, which sets out the formal process and requirements to release or modify existing Council easements on private lands.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council grant approval for the extinguishment of the existing easement and creation of a new easement subject to conditions of this report. 

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To consider a request to relocate Council’s stormwater infrastructure and extinguish an existing Council drainage easement (Dealing G549181) over 47 Carbeen Avenue, St Ives.

 

Background

The property 47 Carbeen Avenue St Ives (Lot 5 DP27030) is currently burdened by a drainage easement of variable width benefitting Council.

 

On 9 November 2016, Council received an application to consider a request for the relocation of Council’s stormwater drainage infrastructure and modification of the associated easement in the rear yard 47 Carbeen Avenue, St Ives (subject property) (Attachment A1).

 

On 22 June 2017, Council approved DA0641/16 for the relocation of a drainage pipe within the rear yard of 47 Carbeen Avenue, St Ives, subject to a deferred commencement approval. The deferred development consent was conditional on the applicant meeting a number of conditions including obtaining Council’s approval for the relocation of an existing stormwater pipe and extinguishment of the associated drainage easement:

 

SCHEDULE A - Deferred commencement condition – Terms to be satisfied prior to the consent becoming operable

 

The following deferred commencement terms must be complied with to the satisfaction of Council within 24 months of the date of issue of this deferred commencement consent:

 

1.       Approval for relocation of Council pipe and easement

 

Prior to the operation of the consent, the Applicant shall obtain a resolution from Ku-ring-gai Council as the asset owner that it will consent to the relocation of the existing Council easement for drainage and underground pipe.

 

Council’s resolution is required for the relocation of the pipe and easement and is to be obtained prior to the operation of the consent. Such approval is not guaranteed and conditions may be imposed including monetary incentives to extinguish and relocate easements.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment and Council's assets.

 

2.       Approval of beneficiaries for relocation of easement

 

Prior to the operation of the consent, the Applicant shall obtain the written agreement of the beneficiaries to the relocation of the drainage easement created with the registration of AF660466.

 

Reason:      To protect the environment.

 

The Applicant will be required to create a new easement in favour of Council once the new infrastructure is in situ thereby not diminishing Council’s interest over the subject property.

 

Comments

The Applicant has submitted the required application for the extinguishment of Council’s easementThe easement application is in accordance with Council’s adopted Easement Management Policy 2013, which sets out the formal process and requirements to release or modify existing Council easements on private lands. These requirements include an undertaking from the Applicant to meet all of Council’s costs associated with the request and the payment of compensation in the event the release or modification of the easement is approved by Council.

 

The acceptance of the application and the accompanying assessment fee does not confirm that the easement request will be approved, and this is clearly stated in the Easement Management Policy.

 

Council’s adopted Easement Management Policy specifically provides for compensation where the extinguishment and relocation of a Council easement provides a commercial benefit to the developer or an “uplift” in the property’s value.  This is not the case in this application.

 

integrated planning and reporting

Theme – Leadership and Governance -  L2 Financial capacity and sustainability

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise service delivery

Council maintains and improves its long term financial position and performance

Continue to analyse opportunities to expand the revenue base of Council

 

Governance Matters

Council is permitted to dispose, or deal with property, including easements, in accordance with the Local Government Act, 1993.

 

On 27 August 2013, Council adopted the “Easement Management Policy” (Policy).  The Policy states that “an easement is a valuable proprietary right that benefits Council and that Council can only agree to extinguish and create an easement by way Council resolution.”

 

Subject to Council resolution the appropriate legal instrument and associated documentation is reviewed by Council’s solicitors, i.e. a Section 88B instrument.

 

Risk Management

The infrastructure belongs to Council and is still in use for stormwater drainage purposes. The Applicant has been advised that if Council is to approve the extinguishment of the easement a new easement would be required to ensure access rights to Council are not be diminished.

 

Council’s legal representatives will have carriage of this matter on behalf of Council.

 

Financial Considerations

In most cases, the extinguishment of a Council easement would trigger a compensation payment to Council, especially where the extinguishment of the easement provides a benefit to a developer in terms of a financial benefit or uplift in the property’s value.

Council’s adopted Easement Management Policy 2013 provides at Clause 5.2.6 (c) that “where Council would suffer no loss or injury if the easement is extinguished, the Council may agree to the extinguishment of that easement without payment of compensation.”

 

In this case the extinguishment of the easement provides no benefit to the property owner in terms of a financial benefit or significant uplift in the property’s value and as a result, compensation is not deemed to be a reasonable request under these circumstances.

 

The Easement Management Policy 2013 also provides for the Applicant to be responsible for all costs associated with the extinguishment/modification/creation of the easement.

 

Social Considerations

Council and its officers have a responsibility to the community to only dispose of Council’s interests in property in an objective and fair manner.

 

Environmental Considerations

In approving DA0641/06 the environmental considerations have been taken into account.

 

Community Consultation

There has been no specific community consultation undertaken in relation to this report.

 

Internal Consultation

Consultation has been held with Council’s Operations, Development and Regulation and Strategy and Environment staff. Officers from these divisions have reviewed and considered matters associated with the proposed easement extinguishment and creation.

 

Summary

The property 47 Carbeen Avenue St Ives (Lot 5 DP27030) is currently burdened by a drainage easement benefitting Council.

 

On 9 November 2016, Council received an application to consider a request for the relocation of Council’s stormwater drainage infrastructure and modification of the associated easement at the subject property.

 

On 22 June 2017, Council approved DA0641/16 for the relocation of a drainage pipe within the rear yard of 47 Carbeen Avenue, St Ives, subject to a deferred commencement approval conditional on the applicant meeting a number of conditions including obtaining Council’s approval for the relocation of an existing stormwater pipe and extinguishment of the associated drainage easement.

 

The Applicant has submitted the required application in accordance with Council’s adopted Easement Management Policy 2013.

 

Council’s adopted Easement Management Policy specifically provides for compensation where the extinguishment and relocation of a Council easement provides a commercial benefit to the developer or an “uplift” in the property’s value.  In this case the extinguishment of the easement provides no benefit to the property owner in terms of a financial benefit or significant uplift in the property’s value and as a result, compensation is not deemed to be a reasonable request under these circumstances.

 

The Easement Management Policy 2013 also provides for the Applicant to be responsible for all costs associated with the extinguishment/modification/creation of the easement.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That the Applicant be advised that Council grants approval to extinguish the existing drainage easement (Dealing G549181) burdening 47 Carbeen Avenue St Ives (Lot 5 DP27030) in accordance with DA0641/16.

 

B.   That the Applicant be advised that Council grants approval to create a new drainage easement burdening 47 Carbeen Avenue St Ives (Lot 5 DP27030) in accordance with DA0641/16.

 

C.   That the General Manager or his delegate be authorised to negotiate Council’s requirements for the relocation of the existing easement that benefits Council over Lot 5 DP 27030 and the creation of a new easement on another part of the property approved by Council.

 

D.   That authority be given to the General Manager and the Mayor to affix the Common Seal of the Council to the instrument for the release of the easement and/or create a new easement and execute all documentation associated with the conveyance.

 

E.   That all costs associated with the extinguishment and creation of the easement, including legal and survey costs, and all costs associated with the drainage works are to be borne by the applicant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deborah Silva

Manager Integrated Planning, Property & Assets

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Additional Documents - Preliminary review - Site Plan - 47 Carbeen Avenue St Ives

 

2017/113689

   


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

NM.1 / 200

 

 

Item NM.1

S08640/3

 

29 June 2017

 

 

Notice of Rescission

 

 

Lindfield Learning Village - Updated Heads of Agreement

 

Notice of Rescission from Councillors Szatow, Citer and Pettett dated 29 June 2017

 

We move to rescind negotiation by Council with the NSW Department of Education on the capital and operational costs associated with public use of the auditorium facility at the Lindfield Learning Village.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Rescission as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Cheryl Szatow

Councillor for Gordon Ward

 

 

 

 

Councillor David Citer

Councillor for Gordon Ward

 

 

 

 

Councillor Jeff Pettett

Councillor for Comenarra Ward

 

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 18 July 2017

NM.2 / 201

 

 

Item NM.2

S07533

 

10 July 2017

 

 

Notice of Motion

 

 

At Grade Parking St Ives Village Green

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Berlioz dated 10 July 2017

 

The plans for right angle carparking proposed in the SIVG Masterplan will result in the loss of street trees and more importantly the apparent loss of native vegetation on Cowan Road and a number of significant trees on the Green along Memorial Avenue.

 

According to the Masterplan, the current pathway and verge would be replaced by a pathway measuring 2.5metres.

 

The replacement pathway would run parallel to the road to replace the existing verge and pathway and the boundary of the Green would be set back into the Green. It appears this will result in the removal of a number of significant original trees in Memorial Avenue, in addition to reducing the net area of Village Green by a around 300 sqm.

 

Along Cowan Road, the right angle carparking would require the removal of native vegetation for the relocation of the pathway.

 

There is currently congestion and competition for carparking in St Ives as the retail/commercial businesses adjacent the Greenhave not provided adequate car-parking.  There consequently exists a shortfall of about 450 car spaces that is provided by council owned carparks. 

 

The 20 hectare site Village Green site was acquired in 1948 and a Committee of residents fund raised for the facilities on the Green and started tree planting in 1953.  At grade carparking is required to service the users of the Green. However, it is unacceptable that St Ives residents should pay for the car parking shortfall by retail /commercial owners with the loss of significant green open space and vegetation on such a significant open space. This is particularly objectionable when council plans to dispose of the existing council at grade carparks.

 

I move that, for the right angle carparking proposal on Memorial Avenue and on Cowan Road, a report come back to council with:

 

1.   An overlay of the vegetation mapping on the plans for right angle car parking on Cowan Road and Memorial Avenue. These plans must include a scale drawing of the proposed relocated pathways and adjusted boundary to the Village Green in addition to the identification of all trees to be removed or which will be affected by construction within their TPZ zone.

 

2.   Council present other options for provision of at-grade parking to service the users of the Village Green that do not compromise the size of the Green or require removal of vegetation.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Christiane Berlioz

Councillor for St Ives Ward