Ordinary Meeting of Council

TO BE HELD ON Tuesday, 14 November 2017 AT 7:00 pm

Level 3, Council Chamber

 

Agenda

** ** ** ** ** **

 

 

NOTE:  For Full Details, See Council’s Website –

www.kmc.nsw.gov.au under the link to business papers

 

 

APOLOGIEs

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

 

Confirmation of Reports to be Considered in Closed Meeting

 

NOTE:

 

That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of following confidential report and its attachments:

 

C.1    Ku-ring-gai Fitness & Aquatic Centre - Legal Proceedings Update

This report should be dealt with in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government [General] Regulation 2005 under:

 

Section 10A(2)(d) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed:

 

(i)    prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it, or

(ii)   confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of Council, or

(iii)  reveal a trade secret.

 

Section 10A(2)(g) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

 

NOTE:

 

That in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1993, all officers’ reports be released to the press and public, with the exception of confidential attachments to the following General Business reports:

GB.7    Lindfield Village Green

Attachment A2: ............................. Cost estimate Level 3 basement design

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(ii)

GB.8    Bicentennial Park Amenities Upgrades Tender - RFT14-2017

Attachment A1: ......................... Tender Assessment and Recommendation

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A2: ........................................ Additional Financial Statement

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A3: ............ Independent Performance and Financial Assessment

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

GB.9    Howson Oval Amenities Upgrades - Tender - RFT15-2017

Attachment A1: .......................... Assessment and Recommendation Report

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A2: ........................................ Additional Financial Statement

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A3: ............ Independent Performance and Financial Assessment

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

GB.10  Koola Park Amenities Upgrades Tender - RFT16-2017

Attachment A1: ................ Tender Assessment and Recommendation Report

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A2: ........................................ Additional Financial Statement

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

Attachment A3: ............ Independent Performance and Financial Assessment

In Accordance with 10(2)(d)(iii)

 

 

Address the Council

 

NOTE:

Persons who address the Council should be aware that their address will be recorded on the official audio recording of this meeting.

 

 

Documents Circulated to Councillors

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council                                                                       11

 

File: S02131

Meeting held 24 October 2017

Minutes numbered 251 to 267

 

 

minutes from the Mayor

 

MM.1        Major awards for Ku-ring-gai Council's strategic planning                                    43

 

File: CY00128/9

 

It is my pleasant duty to inform my Councillor colleagues and our community of two major awards that the Council has received in the past two weeks. Both awards pay tribute to the strength of our long term urban planning.

 

The Council’s Director of Strategy & Environment, Andrew Watson, has been recognised by his peers through the LGNSW’s Excellence in Leadership Award.

 

For those of you not familiar with the LGNSW, it is the organisation representing all local councils in New South Wales.

 

Andrew was recognised for his outstanding leadership of the Council’s strategic planning area since becoming a Director at Council in 2008.

 

At the time of his appointment, I think it’s fair to say strategic town planning in Ku-ring-gai was at a low ebb.

 

The community was at odds with the Council, which in turn was at odds with the state government, over how future densities and housing growth should be accommodated.

 

Under Andrew’s guidance, the Council’s strategic planners created planning policies for development in appropriate locations, while at the same time putting in place strong protections for Ku-ring-gai’s built heritage.

 

The result is that housing densities in Ku-ring-gai are concentrated along the rail line and heritage conservation areas have maintained the ‘garden suburb’ character of our community.

 

The heritage conservation areas are of particular significance, as despite heritage protection being an accepted norm for many other council areas, for many decades Ku-ring-gai did not have any legal safeguards at all for its built heritage.

 

Over the years Andrew has built a strong professional team with a range of expertise in urban planning and project management. He has also worked closely with the General Manager and other senior managers to set a platform for the renewal of Ku-ring-gai’s major centres.

 

The ‘Activate Ku-ring-gai’ program – which also won a major award last week – is a comprehensive blueprint to help turn major centres such as Lindfield and Turramurra into attractive destinations for people to live, shop and socialise.

 

Through careful masterplanning for each centre, the Council is working to transform these centres with new community buildings, open parkland, new retail opportunities and more housing choice.

 

As a result, Activate Ku-ring-gai has been recognised through the national award in the Excellence in Open Space Planning category by Parks & Leisure Australia.

 

Parks and Leisure Australia is the peak industry association for professionals working in the parks and leisure sector in Australia, representing over 2500 members.

 

On behalf of Council, I thank and congratulate Andrew Watson and all the staff associated with the Activate Ku-ring-gai program. I also thank the many community members and other stakeholders who have contributed to the strength of Ku-ring-gai’s planning. Undoubtedly your input has had tremendous influence in shaping the strong planning outcomes we have created for our community’s future.

  

 

Petitions

 

 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

i.               The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to have a site inspection.

 

ii.             The Mayor to invite Councillors to nominate any item(s) on the Agenda that they wish to adopt in accordance with the officer’s recommendation allowing for minor changes without debate.

 

 

GB.1        Tulkiyan Heritage House - Historic Houses of Australia Association Inc - Update                                                                                                                                                 45

 

File: S06619

 

This report is to provide Councillors with an update on the status of works being undertaken at Tulkiyan Heritage House, 707 Pacific Highway, Gordon.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council receive and note this report.

 

GB.2        2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program                                                           52

 

File: FY00430/9

 

To advise Council of applications received for the 2017
Ku-ring-gai Community Grants program, and to recommend subsequent funding allocations to community groups.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council approve the recommendations in this report for funding of $97,867 for community and cultural groups.

 

 

GB.3        Council Meeting Cycle for 2018                                                                                      58

 

File: CY00438/5

 

To set the Council Meeting dates for 2018.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council adopt the proposed meeting dates for 2018.

 

 

GB.4        Supplementary Report - 16 Buckingham Road Killara                                            64

 

File: DA0205/17

 

To report on the site inspection on 1 November 2017 and to determine Development Application No. 0205/17 for the demolition of existing structures and two lot Torrens Title subdivision.

 

Recommendation:

 

Approval

 

 

GB.5        Update Report on the Development Contributions System                                   84

 

File: S06785/3

 

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of key activities and highlights in the development contributions system over the past six months and anticipated actions and highlights for the coming twelve months.  It has been presented twice a year since 2011/2012.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the information in the report be received and noted and the contributions plans and policies be scheduled for updating concurrent with the broader strategic planning framework.

 

GB.6        Environmental Levy Small Grants Scheme - Round 19                                           95

 

File: S04553/13

 

To seek Council’s endorsement to fund round nineteen (19) of the Environmental Levy’s Community Small Grants Scheme.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council supports the recommendation of the small grants assessment panel to fund fourteen (14) projects, totalling $46,700, under round nineteen (19) of the Environmental Levy Community Small Grants Scheme.

 

 

GB.7        Lindfield Village Green                                                                                                   100

 

File: S10840

 

To report to Council on the findings of investigations into the feasibility and impact of increasing underground short-term parking on the Lindfield Village Green (LVG) project.

 

Recommendation:

 

That Council progresses with the current (DA approved) design for two levels of basement parking and that a Capital Expenditure Review be prepared for referral to the Office of Local Government .

 

 

GB.8        Bicentennial Park Amenities Upgrades Tender - RFT14-2017                             118

 

File: RFT14-2017

 

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing brick and metal roof amenity at Bicentennial Park including the compliance upgrade of the existing disability toilet, and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Recommendation:

 

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the recommendation as detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

GB.9        Howson Oval Amenities Upgrades - Tender - RFT15-2017                                  123

 

File: RFT15-2017

 

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing brick and concrete roof amenities at Howson Oval and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Recommendation:

 

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the recommendation as detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

GB.10      Koola Park Amenities Upgrades Tender - RFT16-2017                                         128

 

File: RFT16-2017

 

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing amenities at Koola Park and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Recommendation:

 

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the recommendation as detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

Extra Reports Circulated to Meeting

 

 

Motions of which due Notice has been given

 

NM.1        Project Committees                                                                                                         133

 

File: S10973-6

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Kelly dated 9 October 2017

 

In the normal course of business in any given year, Council has the carriage of scores of millions of dollars of business in a variety of forms.  At the moment, there are a number of projects under consideration, such as:

 

a.    Marian Street Theatre

b.    Lindfield Village Hub

c.    Bushlands Road development

d.    The Bunnings “3M” site

 

Just to name a few.

 

In the same way that we manage other Council business via committees, I suspect Council, the community and the developers/sponsors would benefit from a dedicated team overseeing all aspects of these projects, providing a single point of contact and acting as a conduit for all parties to ensure projects stay on track and provide valuable transparency.  In addition, they provide a valuable experiential opportunity for both Councillors and Council staff to interact with external stakeholders.

 

I suggest that a committee be formed for each major project, starting with the Lindfield Village Hub project and said committee membership be published to the external stakeholders.

NM.2        Australia Day Celebrations and Citizenship Ceremonies                                     134

 

File: S11591

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Pettett dated 31 October 2017

 

We have seen some interstate councils abandoning Australia Day celebrations and citizenships ceremonies on Australia Day.

 

Ku-ring-Gai council holds its largest citizenship ceremony each year on Australia Day.  This is a day of celebration of being and becoming an Australian.  It is the day when people from all walks of life come together and celebrate what it is to be Australian. As Australians we recognise the past, respect the present and look forward to the future.

 

I move that Council continues to support the Australia Day citizenship ceremonies and the Council supported events held on Australia Day.

 

NM.3        New park at Allan Avenue Turramurra                                                                       135

 

File: S08531

 

Notice of Rescission from Councillors Pettett, Szatow, Smith and Greenfield dated
2 November 2017

 

We, the undersigned councillors, move that the following decision from GB7 of the meeting of
24 October be rescinded.

 

That Council endorses the final concept design for the new park at Allan Avenue, Turramurra;

 

A.   That staff proceed with design development and the preparation of construction documentation including detailed plans, cost estimates and specifications for public tender;

B.   That Council authorises the General Manager to allow minor changes to the concept plan during the design development process where budget or other constraints warrant amendments;

C.   That any increased maintenance costs associated with the new park at Allan Avenue be included in the draft 2018/19 recurrent budget;

D.   That Council endorses the name “Boyds Orchard Park” for the new Park at Allan Avenue, Turramurra;

E.   That the name “Boyds Orchard Park” be submitted to the Geographical Names Board to commence the gazettal process;

F.   That should the name “Boyds Orchard Park” be rejected by the Geographical Names Board that a further report be brought back to Council regarding the proposed name of the park.

 

If the Rescission Motion is successful then we move that:

 

A.   A site inspection be arranged

B.   A detailed design briefing for councillors to be arranged allowing councillor input  before the final design concept and naming of the new park at Allan Avenue Turramurra agenda item is brought back to council

NM.4        Amendment to Plan of Management for the Canoon Road Recreation Area  137

 

File: S09042

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Clarke dated 6 November 2017

 

Ku-ring-gai Netball Association (KNA) is recognised as a leading netball association on the North Shore, comprising 18 clubs and 3600+ members from the Ku-ring-gai area. Currently KNA holds Saturday competition at the Canoon Road Recreational Area, which has served them for the past 40 years. However, current membership numbers mean that the Plan of Management now in place will not adequately serve the association and its members going into the future. Even now traffic is chaotic during winter season in South Turramurra with residents knowing to avoid the area least they get stuck in traffic. By allowing for limited training and games to be held under lights other days of the week, traffic congestion can be alleviated on Saturdays. Furthermore, there is currently a dramatic shortage of training facilities across the Ku-ring-gai area, with some girls having to train on private tennis courts in people’s backyards due to a lack of lit training facilities. This Plan of Management change shown below will help address this shortfall.

 

Action Plan 39, the Canoon Road Recreation Area Plan of Management currently states:

Investigate operating some fixtures and training sessions under lights on Thursday and/or Friday evenings possibly between 5pm and 7.30pm, which would enable times between Saturday fixtures to be maximised allowing for more efficient movement of pedestrians and traffic in the surrounding streets.

 

To accommodate the current and future needs of netball in Ku-ring-gai, it is recommended that the wording in Action Plan 39 be deleted and replaced.

 

I therefore move:

 

A.   That the following changes be made to the Canoon Road Recreation Area Plan of Management:

 

Operating under lights:

·     For training on Mondays Tuesdays and Wednesdays on up to 9 courts (courts 1 – 4, 20, 22 – 25) between 4.30pm – 8.00pm for the winter season

·     For competition games or training on Thursday on up to 9 courts (courts 1 – 4, 20, 22 – 25) between 4.30pm – 8.00pm for the winter season

(This is a key action and high priority in the PoM to reduce usage on Saturdays - the Under 9 age group will be moved from Saturdays to Thursdays)

 

No fixtures or training under lights on Fridays

 

B.   That the amended Plan of Management be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days, and a report come back to Council following the exhibition period.

  

 

BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTICE – SUBJECT TO CLAUSE 241 OF GENERAL REGULATIONS

 

 

Questions Without Notice

 

Inspections Committee – SETTING OF TIME, DATE AND RENDEZVOUS

 

Confidential Business to be dealt with in Closed Meeting

 

CR.1        Ku-ring-gai Fitness & Aquatic Centre - Legal Proceedings Update

 

File: S10420

 

In accordance with the Local Government Act 1993 and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the following business is of a kind as referred to in sections 10A(2)(d)(i) & 10A(2)(g), of the Act, and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

 

Section 10A(2)(d) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed:

 

(i)      prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it, or

(ii)     confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of Council, or

(iii)    reveal a trade secret.

 

This matter is classified confidential under section 10A(2)(d)(i) because it deals with tenders.  Tender details, should they be revealed, may result in commercial disadvantage to parties involved in the tender process.  Some information provided to Council by tenderers is provided on the basis that Council will treat it as commercial in confidence.

 

It is not in the public interest to reveal details of these tenders or the assessment process.  Tenderers have provided sensitive information about their operations in the confidence that their details will not be made public by Council.  The practice of publication of sensitive information provided by tenderers could result in the withholding of such information by tenderers and reduction in the provision of information relevant to Council’s decision.

 

Section 10A(2)(g) of the Act permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege.

 

This matter is classified confidential under section 10A(2)(g) because it contains advice concerning a legal matter that:

 

(a)        is a substantial issue relating to a matter in which the Council is involved

(b)        is clearly identified in the advice, and

(c)        is fully discussed in that advice.

 

It is not in the public interest to release details of the legal advice as it would prejudice Council’s position in court proceedings.

 

Report by Manager Strategic Projects dated 11 October 2017.

 

John McKee

General Manager

 

** ** ** ** ** **


Minute                                           Ku-ring-gai Council                                               Page

MINUTES OF Ordinary Meeting of Council
HELD ON Tuesday, 24 October 2017

 

Present:

The Mayor, Councillor J Anderson (Chairperson)

Councillors J Pettett & C Clarke (Comenarra Ward)

Councillors S Ngai (Roseville Ward)

Councillors D Citer & M Smith (St Ives Ward)

Councillors D Greenfield & C Spencer (Wahroonga Ward)

 

 

Staff Present:

General Manager (John McKee)

Director Corporate (David Marshall)

Director Development & Regulation (Michael Miocic)

Acting Director Operations (Ian Taylor)

Director Strategy & Environment (Andrew Watson)

Director Community (Janice Bevan)

Manager Finance (Angela Apostol)

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning (Antony Fabbro)

Manager Corporate Communications (Virginia Leafe)

Manager Records and Governance (Amber Moloney)

Minutes Secretary (Christine Dunand)

 

 

The Meeting commenced at 7:00 pm

 

The Mayor offered the Prayer

 

 

251

Apologies

 

File: S02194

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Smith/Citer)

 

Councillor Szatow tendered an apology for non-attendance (family) and requested leave of absence.

 

Councillor Kelly tendered an apology for non-attendance (business) and requested leave of absence.

 

That the apologies  be accepted and leave of absence granted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

The Mayor adverted to the necessity for Councillors and staff to declare a Pecuniary Interest/Conflict of Interest in any item on the Business Paper.

 

No Interest was declared.

 

 

Address the Council

 

The following member(s) of the public addressed Council on items not on the agenda:

 

E Gross                Request for enforcement action at 15 Hesperus Street Pymble

M McConnell       Proposed development near Pymble Public School

R Whitington       Proposed development near Pymble Public School

P Baily                 Gordon Golf Club

G Inglis                Gordon Golf Club

C Braid                Gordon Golf Club Lease

W Churche           Governance

 

 

DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED TO COUNCILLORS

 

The Mayor adverted to the documents circulated in the Councillors’ papers and advised that the following matters would be dealt with at the appropriate time during the meeting:

 

Late Items:

MM.1 - Establishment of a Finance Committee - Report by Mayor, Jennifer Anderson dated 24 October 2017

GB.8 - Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2017 - Confirmation of Motions - Report by Manager Records and Governance dated 16 October 2017

 

Councillors Information:

OMC 10/10/2017 Minute Number 250 QN.2 – Heritage Conservation Area – Middle Harbour Road Lindfield

Memorandum from Director Strategy & Environment dated 24 October 2017 in response to a question without notice from Councillor Szatow.

OMC 24/10/2017 GB.2 – Audited General and Special Purpose Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2017 – Submissions

Memorandum from Manager Finance dated 24 October 2017 regarding submissions received for the Financial Statement for year ending 30 June 2017.

OMC 24/10/2017 GB.5 – Amended maps – Middle Harbour Road Heritage Conservation Area

Memorandum from Manager Urban & Heritage Planning dated 24 October 2017 regarding amendments to Attachments 4 and 5 of item GB.5.

OMC10/10/2017 Minute number 249 QN.1 – Clarification by Councillor Kelly on his title of ‘Professor’ and ‘Dr’

Memorandum from Councillor Kelly dated 20 October 2017 responding to a Question without Notice from Councillor Smith.

Preliminary Heritage Assessment of 313 Bobbin Head Road, North Turramurra

Memorandum from Director Strategy & Environment dated
24 October 2017 regarding the potential heritage significance of the service station at 313 Bobbin Head Road North Turramurra.

Allan Avenue Park Community Views

Memorandum from Director Strategy & Environment dated 24 October 2017 regarding provision of originals of all community feedback.

 

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTEs

 

252

Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

File: S02131

 

 

Meeting held 10 October 2017

Minutes numbered 231 to 250

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Spencer)

 

That Minutes numbered 231 to 250 circulated to Councillors were taken as read and confirmed as an accurate record of the proceedings of the Meeting.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

minutes from the Mayor

 

253

Establishment of a Finance Committee

 

File: S05370

Vide: MM.1

 

 

Ku-ring-gai Council is a complex organisation with an annual budget in 2017/18 of $144 million and assets of $1.4 billion, providing services and facilities to a growing population of 123,000 people.  It is critical that Council manages its finances well to ensure a sustainable future. 

 

The Local Government Act sets out the principles of sound financial management at Section 8B as follows:

 

(a)      Council spending should be responsible and sustainable, aligning general revenue and expenses.

(b)      Councils should invest in responsible and sustainable infrastructure for the benefit of the local community.

(c)      Councils should have effective financial and asset management, including sound policies and processes for the following:

(i)       performance management and reporting,

(ii)      asset maintenance and enhancement,

(iii)     funding decisions,

(iv)     risk management practices.

(d)      Councils should have regard to achieving intergenerational equity, including ensuring the following:

(i)      policy decisions are made after considering their financial effects on future generations,

(ii)      the current generation funds the cost of its services.

 

It is proposed that Council establish a Finance Committee to enable focussed deliberation on financial matters separate to the Ordinary Council Meetings.  The Finance Committee would consider matters falling within the scope of Section 8B of the Local Government Act as set out above, including but not limited to:

 

•        long term financial planning

•        budgets and quarterly budget performance

•        asset management

•        capital works and major projects

•        commercial and strategic property matters

•        investments

•        loans

•        fees and charges

•        rating

•        legal issues and costs

 

 

 

 

Key elements of the Finance Committee are proposed as follows:

 

Term:

Approximately 2 years to expire at the same time as the Mayoral term.

 

Membership:

5 Councillors one of whom is the Mayor

 

Chair:

The Chair of the Finance Committee is the Mayor.

In the absence of the Mayor, the Deputy Chair will act as Chair.

 

Quorum:

3 Councillors

 

Delegations:

Nil – the Committee would make recommendations to Council for consideration and adoption.

 

Voting:

Only members of the Committee may vote. 

 

If the voting on a motion put to a meeting of the committee is equal, the Chair of the committee is to have a casting vote as well as an original vote.

 

Attendance:

Clause 263 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 provides that a Councillor who is not a member of a committee of Council is entitled to attend, and to speak at, a meeting of the committee. However, the Councillor is not entitled to give notice of business for inclusion in the agenda for the meeting, or to move or second a motion at the meeting, or to vote at the meeting.

 

Members of the public are entitled to attend committee meetings except during consideration of reports in Closed Meeting.

 

Agendas, Reports and Minutes:

Agendas, reports and minutes will be prepared, distributed and made available to the public in a manner consistent with Ordinary Council Meetings.

 

Meeting Frequency

Committee meetings will be held quarterly to align with the Council budget reporting cycle.  There will be provision for additional meetings if required.

 

 

Resolved:

 

A.      That Council establishes a Finance Committee in accordance with this Mayoral Minute.

 

B.     Terms of reference that are consistent with this Mayoral Minute are to be presented to the first meeting of the Finance Committee for consideration and ratification.

 

C.     In addition to the Mayor as chair, Councillor Clarke as Deputy Chair, Councillors Citer, Spencer and Kelly be appointed as committee members.

 

D.     The first meeting of the Finance Committee is to be held on Monday
20 November 2017 commencing at 7 pm.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Ngai, Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

The above Motion was subject to an Amendment which was LOST. The lost amendment was:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Smith)

 

That the item be deferred to a future date when all Councillors are present to vote.

 

For the Amendment:             Councillors Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

Against the Amendment:       The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Ngai, Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 

 

SITE INSPECTIONS

 

The following motion for a site inspection in relation to item GB.7 was LOST.

 

(Moved Councillors Pettett/Smith)

 

That a site inspection be held for item GB.7  New Park at Allan Avenue Turramurra.

 

For the Site Inspection               Councillors Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

Against the Site Inspection        The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Ngai, Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 


 

GENERAL BUSINESS

 

254

Investment Report as at 30 September 2017

 

File: S05273

Vide: GB.1

 

 

To present Council’s investment portfolio performance for September 2017.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Clarke)

 

A.       That the summary of investments and performance for September 2017 be received and noted.

 

B.       That the Certificate of the Responsible Accounting Officer be noted and the report adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

255

Audited General and Special Purpose Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2017

 

File: S05273

Vide: GB.2

 

 

To present to Council the Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2017 and audit reports from the Audit Office of NSW and to provide a summary of Council’s financial performance and financial position at 30 June 2017.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Clarke)

 

That Council receive the audited Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2017 and the external auditors report from the Audit Office of NSW.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

256

DA0299/17 - Demolition of existing dwelling and Torrens Title subdivision into two lots

 

File: DA0299/17

Vide: GB.3

 

 

Demolition of existing dwelling and Torrens title subdivision into two lots

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Smith)

 

A.   THAT Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the proposed development will be in the public interest, grant development consent to DA0299/17 for demolition of the existing dwelling and Torrens title subdivision of 57-59 Bannockburn Road, Pymble into 2 lots, subject to conditions. Pursuant to Section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, this consent lapses if the approved works are not physically commenced within two (2) years from the date of the notice of determination.

 

CONDITIONS THAT IDENTIFY APPROVED PLANS:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation

 

The subdivision must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

1 of 2 Revision A

Surveyplus

26.06.17

2 of 2 Revision A

Surveyplus

26.06.17

 

The building footprints shown on the approved plans are indicative only and are in no way approved or the implied footprint of any future building(s) on the proposed lots.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION:

 

3.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-          sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos     work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

4.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

5.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

Eastern site boundary

7.0m east, 13.8m elsewhere

T2 Taxodium distichum (Swamp Cypress)

Eastern site boundary

2.0m east 4.4m elsewhere

T3 Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Crippsii’ (Hinoki Cypress) Eastern site boundary

4.0m

T3a Nyssa sylvatica (Tupelo)

Eastern site boundary

4.0m

T7 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum)

South-west site corner

Western side of existing driveway (top of retaining wall), 10.2m elsewhere

T8 Stenocarpus sinuatus (Q’ld Firewheel Tree)

Centrally located on site within Rushall St frontage

2.7m

T9 Castanospermum australe (Blackbean)

Centrally located on site within Rushall St frontage

6.0m

T10 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum)

Southern site frontage

Eastern side of existing driveway/top of retaining wall, 8.0m elsewhere

T12 Eucalyptus microcorys (Tallowood)

Southern site boundary

12.0m

T16 Ficus macrocarpa var. hillii (Hill’s Weeping Fig)

Eastern site boundary

9.0m

T17 Lagunaria Patersonia (Norfolk Island Hibiscus)

Eastern site boundary

3.0m

T20 Eucalyptus paniculata (Grey Ironbark)

Eastern site boundary

6.5m

T24 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

North-east site corner

13.0m south-west, 15.0m elsewhere

T26 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

Northern site boundary

4.0m

T27 Elaeocarpus reticulatus (Blueberry Ash)

North of existing dwelling

3.5m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

7.     Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

8.     Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

·           Tree protection zone.

·           This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·           The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

9.     Tree protection mulching

 

Prior to works commencing and throughout construction, the area of the tree protection zone is to be mulched to a depth of 100mm with composted organic material being 75% Eucalyptus leaf litter and 25% wood.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

 

10.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, a joint inspection of the site by the Project Arborist and Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

11.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, a waste management plan is to be prepared by a suitably qualified person, which is prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:     The plan shall be provided to Council prior to the commencement of works.

 

Reason:         To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

12.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act works shall not commence until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

13.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to Council, where it is required or applicable to this approval.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

 

 

14.   Utility provider requirements

 

Prior to the commencement of works, the applicant must make contact with all relevant utility providers whose services will be impacted upon by the development. A written copy of the requirements of each provider, as determined necessary by the Certifying Authority, must be obtained.  All utility services or appropriate conduits for the same must be provided by the developer in accordance with the specifications of the utility providers.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the requirements of relevant utility providers.

 

15.   Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee

 

To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

(a)        All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

(b)        The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

(c)        The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

(d)        In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.

 

(e)        In this condition:

 

“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:          To maintain public infrastructure.

 

16.   Section 94 Contributions

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Key Community Infrastructure

Amount

LGA wide recreation and cultural facilities

$3,036.54

Local parks and local sporting facilities

$24,039.35

Total:

$27,075.89

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and will continue to be indexed to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index until they are paid in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Contributions outside the designated centres may be subject to a maximum contribution total in accordance with the s94E Direction issued by the Minister for Planning dated 21 August 2012, for so long as it remains legally in force.  If the total amount above is an exact multiple of $20,000 then the contributions calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 exceeded the maximum contribution payable and have been capped.  If the process of inflation carries the contribution above over the maximum amount permitted by the s94E Direction prior to payment, the amount will be limited at time of receipt.  Please contact Council to verify the total contributions payable prior to payment.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Reason:       To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED DURING THE DEMOLITION, EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES:

 

17.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

18.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·           the work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

·           in the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence

·           if the development involves an excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building, structure or work (including any structure or work within a road or rail corridor) on adjoining land, the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense:

 

(a)   protect and support the building, structure or work from possible damage from the excavation, and

(b)   where necessary, underpin the building, structure or work to prevent any such damage.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement.

 

19.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:     Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:          To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

20.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

21.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

22.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·           be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·           display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder

·           be durable and weatherproof

·           display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·           be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

23.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·           physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·           earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·           all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·           the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·           all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·           all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·           gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·           cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

24.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

25.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

26.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

27.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

28.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

29.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

30.   Arborist’s report

 

The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:

 

Tree/Location

Time of inspection

All retained trees On site and surrounding road verge

*Certification and inspection of tree protection fencing as per consent conditions *Completion of all works on site

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

31.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are severed, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

32.   Cutting of tree roots

 

No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

Eastern site boundary

13.8m

T2 Taxodium distichum (Swamp Cypress)

Eastern site boundary

4.4m

T3 Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Crippsii’ (Hinoki Cypress) Eastern site boundary

4.8m

T3a Nyssa sylvatica (Tupelo)

Eastern site boundary

4.0m

T7 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum)

South-west site corner

10.2m

T8 Stenocarpus sinuatus (Q’ld Firewheel Tree)

Centrally located on site within Rushall St frontage

2.7m

T9 Castanospermum australe (Blackbean)

Centrally located on site within Rushall St frontage

6.0m

T10 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum)

Southern site frontage

8.0m

T11 Callistemon viminalis (Weeping Bottlebrush)

Rushall St road reserve

3.0m

T12 Eucalyptus microcorys (Tallowood)

Southern site boundary

14.0m

T13 Callistemon viminalis (Weeping Bottlebrush)

Rushall St road reserve

5.0m

T16 Ficus macrocarpa var. hillii (Hill’s Weeping Fig)

Eastern site boundary

9.0m

T17 Lagunaria Patersonia (Norfolk Island Hibiscus)

Eastern site boundary

3.0m

T20 Eucalyptus paniculata (Grey Ironbark)

Eastern  site boundary

6.5m

T24 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

North-east site corner

15.0m

 

Reason:    To protect existing trees.

 

 

33.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:

 

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

T18 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

Eastern site boundary

Removal

T19 Toona australis (Red Cedar)

Eastern site boundary

Removal

 

Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Development Control Plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

34.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

T1 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

Eastern site boundary

9.0m east, 13.8m elsewhere

T2 Taxodium distichum (Swamp Cypress)

Eastern site boundary

4.4m

T3 Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Crippsii’ (Hinoki Cypress) Eastern site boundary

4.8m

T3a Nyssa sylvatica (Tupelo)

Eastern site boundary

4.0m

T7 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum)

South-west site corner

10.2m

T8 Stenocarpus sinuatus (Q’ld Firewheel Tree)

Centrally located on site within Rushall St frontage

2.7m

T9 Castanospermum australe (Blackbean)

Centrally located on site within Rushall St frontage

6.0m

T10 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum)

Southern site frontage

8.0m

T11 Callistemon viminalis (Weeping Bottlebrush)

Rushall St road reserve

3.0m

T12 Eucalyptus microcorys (Tallowood)

Southern site boundary

14.0m

T13 Callistemon viminalis (Weeping Bottlebrush)

Rushall St road reserve

5.0m

T16 Ficus macrocarpa var. hillii (Hill’s Weeping Fig)

Eastern site boundary

9.0m

T17 Lagunaria Patersonia (Norfolk Island Hibiscus)

Eastern site boundary

3.0m

T20 Eucalyptus paniculata (Grey Ironbark)

Eastern site boundary

6.5m

T24 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

North-east site corner

13.0m south-west, 15.0m elsewhere

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

35.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

36.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

37.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·           Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·           This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

38.   Infrastructure repair (demolition only)

 

At the completion of demolition works, Council must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF A SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE:

 

39.   Completion of landscape works

 

Prior to the release of the Subdivision Certificate, Council is to be satisfied that all landscape works, including the removal of all noxious and/or environmental weed species, have been undertaken in accordance with the approved plan(s) and conditions of consent.

 

Reason:       To ensure that the landscape works are consistent with the development consent.

 

40.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to release of the linen plan/issue of the subdivision certificate, the Section 73 Sydney Water compliance certificate which refers to the subdivision application must be obtained and submitted to the Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

41.   Requirements of public authorities for connection to services

 

Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, Council shall be satisfied that the applicant has complied with the requirements of any public authorities (e.g. Energy Australia, Sydney Water, Telstra Australia, AGL, etc) in regard to the connection, relocation and/or adjustment of the services affected by the proposed subdivision. All costs related to the relocation, adjustment or support of services are the responsibility of the applicant.

 

Note:     Details of compliance with the requirements of any relevant public authorities are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that services are available to the allotments of land.

 

42.   Provision of services

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, separate underground electricity, gas and phone or appropriate conduits for the same, must be provided to each allotment to the satisfaction of the utility provider. A suitably qualified and experienced engineer or surveyor is to provide certification that all new lots have ready underground access to the services of electricity, gas and phone. Alternatively, a letter from the relevant supply authorities stating the same may be submitted to satisfy this condition.

 

Reason:         Access to public utilities.

 

43.   Issue of Subdivision Certificate

 

The Subdivision Certificate must not be issued until all conditions of development consent have been satisfied, to the satisfaction of Council.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is completed prior to transfer of responsibility for the site and development to another person.

 

44.   Submission of 88b instrument

 

Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the applicant must submit an original instrument under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act with the plan of subdivision, plus six (6) copies to Council. Ku-ring-gai Council must be named as the authority whose consent is required to release, vary or modify the burdens.

 

Reason:         To create all required easements, rights-of-carriageway, positive covenants, restrictions-on-use or other burdens/benefits as may be required.

 

45.   Submission of plans of subdivision (Torrens title)

 

For endorsement of the subdivision certificate, the applicant shall submit an original plan of subdivision plus 6 copies, suitable for endorsement by Council. The following details must be submitted with the plan of subdivision and its copies:

 

a)         the endorsement fee current at the time of lodgement

b)         the 88B instrument plus 6 copies

c)         a copy of the Final Certificate issued for DA0299/17

d)         all surveyor’s and/or consulting engineers’ certification(s) required under this subdivision consent

e)         The Section 73 (Sydney Water) Compliance Certificate for the subdivision.

 

Council will check the consent conditions on the subdivision. Failure to submit the required information will delay endorsement of the linen plan and may require payment of rechecking fees. Plans and copies of subdivision must not be folded. Council will not accept bonds in lieu of completing subdivision works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

46.   General easement/R.O.W. provision and certification

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, a registered surveyor is to provide details to Council that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.  Alternatively, where the surveyor is of the opinion that creation of burdens and benefits is not required, then proof to this effect must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.

 

47.   Tree protection - Section 88b instrument

 

Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be provided with evidence of the creation of a restriction on the use of land under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919, burdening the area of land beneath the canopy of the following tree/s for a specified radius in metres from the trunk of that tree, the terms of which state that any excavations, soil level changes or construction works are prohibited:

 

Tree No.

Tree

Location

Radius

T1

Eucalyptus saligna

(Blue Gum)

Western site boundary of Lot 370

7.0m south-east, 13.0m elsewhere

T3

Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Crippsii’ (Golden Hinoki Cypress)

Western site boundary of Lot 370

4.5m

T12

Eucalyptus microcorys (Tallowood)

Southern site boundary of Lot 371

14.0m

T24

Eucalyptus saligna

(Blue Gum)

Eastern site boundary of Lot 371

10.0m

 

Reason:         To protect existing vegetation.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

257

Re-appointment of existing Membership for Heritage Reference Committee

 

File: CY00413/5

Vide: GB.6

 

 

Council to re-appoint the existing membership of the Heritage Reference Committee (HRC) and seek nominations in early 2018.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Clarke)

 

A.   Council resolves to re-appoint the current members of the Heritage Reference Committee as an interim measure for a period of at least 6 months; and

 

B.   Council resolves to call for nominations to the Heritage Reference Committee in early 2018.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

 

258

Local Government NSW Annual Conference 2017 - Confirmation of Motions

 

File: S02046/10

Vide: GB.8

 

 

To confirm any motions that Council wishes to submit to the 2017 Local Government NSW Annual Conference.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Clarke)

 

That Council submit the following motion to the 2017 Local Government NSW Annual Conference:

That LGNSW requests the NSW Government to reform the procedures in relation to Code of Conduct complaints against councillors by removal of the involvement of general managers and the creation of an independent watchdog to consider genuine complaints against councillors and prosecute frivolous or vexatious grievances.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

259

Consideration of submissions - Draft Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan - Greenweb Map Amendment

 

File: S11507

Vide: GB.4

 

 

For Council to consider submissions received in response to the public exhibition of the Draft Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan – Greenweb Map Amendment.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Citer/Clarke)

 

A.   That Council adopts the amended Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan incorporating the revised Greenweb Maps included as Attachment A1.

 

B.   That Council’s adoption of the amended Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan be notified in the North Shore Times and Hornsby Advocate in accordance with Clause 21(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 The public notice is to specify that the amended DCP is to come into effect on the day that the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Amendment No.14) is published on the NSW Legislation Website.

 

C.   That the amended Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan be forwarded to the Secretary of the Department of Planning and Environment. Clause 25AB of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

Standing Orders were suspended to deal with items
where there are speakers first, (commencing with item GB.7 New park at Allan Avenue Turramurra because there were children present) after a
motion was moved by Councillors Pettett and Clarke
was CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 

Councillor Citer withdrew during discussion

Councillor Citer returned

 

260

New park at Allan Avenue Turramurra

 

File: S08531

Vide: GB.7

 

 

To seek Council’s endorsement of the concept design plan and the proposed naming for the new park at Allan Avenue, Turramurra and proceed to tender for construction.

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

A Lydement

J Adams

T Boesch

D Mahoney

D McCarthy

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Citer/Spencer)

 

A.   That Council endorses the final concept design for the new park at Allan Avenue, Turramurra;

 

B.   That staff proceed with design development and the preparation of construction documentation including detailed plans, cost estimates and specifications for public tender;

 

C.   That Council authorises the General Manager to allow minor changes to the concept plan during the design development process where budget or other constraints warrant amendments;

 

D.   That any increased maintenance costs associated with the new park at Allan Avenue be included in the draft 2018/19 recurrent budget;

 

E.   That Council endorses the name “Boyds Orchard Park” for the new Park at Allan Avenue, Turramurra;

 

F.   That the name “Boyds Orchard Park” be submitted to the Geographical Names Board to commence the gazettal process;

 

G.   That should the name “Boyds Orchard Park” be rejected by the Geographical Names Board that a further report be brought back to Council regarding the proposed name of the park.

 

For the Amendment:             The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 

Against the Amendment:       Councillors Ngai, Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

The voting being EQUAL, the Mayor exercised her Casting Vote

IN FAVOUR of the Amendment

 

The amendment became the Motion.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Ngai, Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

The voting being EQUAL, the Mayor exercised her Casting Vote

IN FAVOUR of the Resolution

 

The above was an amendment to an original motion. The original motion was:

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Smith)

 

That Councillors receive a briefing, and a site inspection be arranged.

 

 


 

Councillor Citer withdrew during discussion

Councillor Spencer withdrew during discussion

 

Councillor Citer returned

Councillor Spencer returned

 

 

261

Consideration of submissions on the planning proposal for Middle Harbour Road Heritage Conservation Area

 

File: S11160

Vide: GB.5

 

 

For Council to consider the submissions received during the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal to include Middle Harbour Road Conservation Area in Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015 (KLEP 2015).

 

The following members of the public addressed Council on this item:


 

W Goh

U Bonzol

A Pik

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Citer/Clarke)

 

A.   That Council resolves to adopt the Planning Proposal to list the amended Middle Harbour Road Conservation Area as identified in Attachment A4 in Schedule 5 and the Heritage Map of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015.

 

B.   That Council forwards the amended Planning Proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment in accordance with section 59 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 with a request to make arrangements to give effect to the final proposal.

 

C.   That those who made a submission be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Ngai, Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

  

 


 

Motions of which due Notice has been given

 

262

Project Committees

 

File: S10973-6

Vide: NM.2

 

The following member of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

L McDonald

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Kelly dated 9 October 2017

 

In the normal course of business in any given year, Council has the carriage of scores of millions of dollars of business in a variety of forms.  At the moment, there are a number of projects under consideration, such as:

 

a.       Marian Street Theatre

b.       Lindfield Village Hub

c.       Bushlands Road development

d.       The Bunnings “3M” site

 

Just to name a few.

 

In the same way that we manage other Council business via committees, I suspect Council, the community and the developers/sponsors would benefit from a dedicated team overseeing all aspects of these projects, providing a single point of contact and acting as a conduit for all parties to ensure projects stay on track and provide valuable transparency.  In addition, they provide a valuable experiential opportunity for both Councillors and Council staff to interact with external stakeholders.

 

I suggest that a committee be formed for each major project, starting with the Lindfield Village Hub project and said committee membership be published to the external stakeholders.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Anderson/Spencer)

 

That this Notice of Motion be deferred to clarify if Councillor Kelly is satisfied with the Mayoral Minute MM.1 as adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

263

Lindfield Village Hub Project

 

File: S10973-5

Vide: NM.3

 

The following member of the public addressed Council on this item:

 

S McKenzie

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Pettett dated 11 October 2017

 

Many candidates and a number of whom are now Councillors pledged their support that within sixty days of the Council election they would actively support Support Lindfield in organising another community forum at which Council staff will provide a full update on the project including a clear time frame for the delivery of the key milestones and allow a reasonable time for questions and answers.

 

The feedback received prior to the election was that the community is unaware of where the project is at. It is essential that the community is regularly updated and that the Ward Councillors continue to actively support this major project.

 

I move that Council staff provide a full update on the Lindfield Village Hub project including a clear time frame for the delivery of the key milestones and allow a reasonable time for questions and answers at the public forum arranged by Council, open to all interested members of the public.

 

 

The following motion was put to Council and LOST.

 

(Moved: Councillors Pettett/Ngai)

 

  1. That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

  1. That a community forum to occur by 30 November 2017, and be held on a weeknight or Saturday evening.

 

For the Resolution:                Councillors Ngai, Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

Against the Resolution:         The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 

The voting being EQUAL, the Mayor exercised her Casting Vote

AGAINST the Motion

 

 


 

264

Bushfire preparation – rubbish collection (green waste)

 

File: S02294

Vide: NM.1

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Kelly dated 3 October 2017

 

The bushfire preparation season is upon us and many residents have more green waste than is able to be taken away in one green waste collection per fortnight.  This results in “potential bonfires” accumulating in the very area where we want to minimise the risk of bushfires.

 

I believe all parties – being residents, Rural Fire Service and Council – would benefit if there were to be a green waste collection in the bushfire prone areas of more than one collection per week – perhaps two minimum and maybe more, if found to be necessary.  We’ve already seen an uncontrolled bushfire event in Gordon only at the recent long weekend.

 

I suggest

 

A.   That Council look at increasing the green waste collection during the bushfire preparation period from two collections a month to a max of two a week

 

B.   That a report come back to Council in relation to associated costs etc. as soon as possible for a decision on whether to implement this increased cycle

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Clarke/Spencer)

 

That this Notice of Motion be deferred pending a report from staff back to Council.

 

For the Resolution:                The Mayor, Councillor Anderson, Councillors Ngai, Clarke, Spencer and Citer

 

Against the Resolution:         Councillors Pettett, Greenfield and Smith

 

 


 

265

Soft Plastics Recycling

 

File: S09069/7

Vide: NM.4

 

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Ngai dated 16 October 2017

 

Soft plastics such as bread bags, biscuit and pasta packaging, frozen food bags, lolly and chip packaging, and cereal liners currently cannot be recycled through the Council’s yellow bins. Soft plastics are known to jam up machines at recycling facilities and the costs for these facilities to manually sort out soft plastics are high, hence the reason for their exclusion.

 

While Council does not currently offer soft plastics recycling, it instead refers our residents to drop them off at the soft plastics recycling collection points offered by some of our major supermarkets. However there has been low resident participation in the supermarket schemes due to a low number of collection points, low capacity of each collection bin, and low awareness within the local government area.

 

As a result, the majority of Ku-ring-gai’s soft plastics are going towards general waste. It must also be noted that in 2013/14, the percentage of household waste diverted from landfill was 60% but this has fallen to 55% by 2016/17.

 

I move that:

 

A.   Council undertake a feasibility study of increasing the number of soft plastics collection points within our local government area. Collection points could include local schools and Council facilities such as libraries, parks, the Council Chambers, and the arts centre. As residents will also be recycling containers at vending machines associated with the State Government’s ‘Return and Earn’ Container Deposit Scheme, the Council should also consider placing soft plastics collection points next to these vending machines.

 

B.   The feasibility study considers the steps involved in raising awareness of soft plastics recycling to all of our residents.

 

C.   The feasibility and costing options be reported back to the Councillors in time for consideration in the upcoming 2018/19 budget process.

 

 

Resolved:

 

(Moved: Councillors Ngai/Pettett)

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

 


 

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

 

266

Clarification on DA0402/17 - 2 Reely Street, 102 and 104 Bannockburn Road, PYMBLE: 83 Bobbin Head Road, TURRAMURRA - Demolish existing structures and construct 16 seniors living dwellings

 

File: DA0402/17

Vide: QN.1

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Cedric Spencer

 

 

Madam Mayor my question is to the relevant director or directors which is in relation to two earlier speakers about a particular DA, which number I cannot remember. I believe one of them was Mr Whitington and the other one, Ms McConnell. My question would be at what stage is the DA and has an officer been assigned to consider the submissions. Those are my questions thank you.

 

Answered by Director Development & Regulation

 

The Director Development & Regulation advised the application is at the very early stages it is still on public notification and the process is that through that public notification process any submission are referred to the appropriate officer and then are dealt with as part of that application. An officer has also been assigned to that application.

 

 

 

267

Follow up on Councillor Kelly’s use of his titles 'Professor' and 'Dr'

 

File: S09749-3

Vide: QN.2

 

 

Question Without Notice from Councillor Martin Smith

 

 

Madam Mayor my question is actually to you Madam Mayor. My question relates to Councillor Kelly’s response to my question from Council’s last meeting regarding the qualifications of “Professor” and “Dr”. Councillor Kelly’s response states that his qualifications do not determine his ability to carry out his duties as Councillor and that he refuses to answer my reasonable question. Madam Mayor, both you and I know that an integral part of being a Councillor is that you must be open, ethical and honest. I believe the qualifications that Councillor Kelly advertised may have made a great impact with voters in supporting his capability to represent them in Council using those titles “Professor” and “Dr” in Councillor Kelly’s election material may have influenced voters. Madam Mayor can you advise what steps can be taken to assist the rate payers of Ku-ring-gai to obtain a proper answer to my initial question to Councillor Kelly as I believe the rate payers have the right to know who they have voted for.

 

Answered by The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson

 

The Mayor, Councillor Jennifer Anderson advised that no one can compel a Councillor to respond to a question in any particular fashion, it’s up to them. Councillor Kelly has responded in way that he obviously is willing to do. Other than that if the community has any concerns there are processes in place for them to contact either the Department of Local Government or Council officers for further advice.

 

 

The Meeting closed at 9.26 pm

 

The Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Council held on 24 October 2017 (Pages 1 - 32) were confirmed as a full and accurate record of proceedings on 14 November 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

          __________________________                                 __________________________

                   General Manager                                                         Mayor / Chairperson

 

 

 


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

MM.1 / 43

 

 

Item MM.1

CY00128/9

 

6 November 2017

 

 

Mayoral Minute

 

 

Major awards for Ku-ring-gai Council's strategic planning

 

It is my pleasant duty to inform my Councillor colleagues and our community of two major awards that the Council has received in the past two weeks. Both awards pay tribute to the strength of our long term urban planning.

 

The Council’s Director of Strategy & Environment, Andrew Watson, has been recognised by his peers through the LGNSW’s Excellence in Leadership Award.

 

For those of you not familiar with the LGNSW, it is the organisation representing all local councils in New South Wales.

 

Andrew was recognised for his outstanding leadership of the Council’s strategic planning area since becoming a Director at Council in 2008.

 

At the time of his appointment, I think it’s fair to say strategic town planning in Ku-ring-gai was at a low ebb.

 

The community was at odds with the Council, which in turn was at odds with the state government, over how future densities and housing growth should be accommodated.

 

Under Andrew’s guidance, the Council’s strategic planners created planning policies for development in appropriate locations, while at the same time putting in place strong protections for Ku-ring-gai’s built heritage.

 

The result is that housing densities in Ku-ring-gai are concentrated along the rail line and heritage conservation areas have maintained the ‘garden suburb’ character of our community.

 

The heritage conservation areas are of particular significance, as despite heritage protection being an accepted norm for many other council areas, for many decades Ku-ring-gai did not have any legal safeguards at all for its built heritage.

 

Over the years Andrew has built a strong professional team with a range of expertise in urban planning and project management. He has also worked closely with the General Manager and other senior managers to set a platform for the renewal of Ku-ring-gai’s major centres.

 

The ‘Activate Ku-ring-gai’ program – which also won a major award last week – is a comprehensive blueprint to help turn major centres such as Lindfield and Turramurra into attractive destinations for people to live, shop and socialise.

 

Through careful masterplanning for each centre, the Council is working to transform these centres with new community buildings, open parkland, new retail opportunities and more housing choice.

 

As a result, Activate Ku-ring-gai has been recognised through the national award in the Excellence in Open Space Planning category by Parks & Leisure Australia.

 

Parks and Leisure Australia is the peak industry association for professionals working in the parks and leisure sector in Australia, representing over 2500 members.

 

On behalf of Council, I thank and congratulate Andrew Watson and all the staff associated with the Activate Ku-ring-gai program. I also thank the many community members and other stakeholders who have contributed to the strength of Ku-ring-gai’s planning. Undoubtedly your input has had tremendous influence in shaping the strong planning outcomes we have created for our community’s future.

 

Recommendation:

 

That this Mayoral Minute be noted and adopted as printed.

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Jennifer Anderson

Mayor

 

 

 

   


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.1 / 45

 

 

Item GB.1

S06619

 

31 October 2017

 

 

Tulkiyan Heritage House - Historic Houses of Australia Association Inc - Update

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

This report is to provide Councillors with an update on the status of works being undertaken at Tulkiyan Heritage House, 707 Pacific Highway, Gordon.

 

 

background:

Council resolved, on 6 September 2016, to negotiate an agreement with the Historic Houses Association of Australia Inc (HHAA), to manage Tulkiyan as a heritage house museum. In October 2016 a hot water leak damaged a portion of the property and a number of items in the collection.

 

 

comments:

An insurance claim has been lodged and remediation work is about to commence on the property and contents that were damaged. The HHAA will be closely involved in curating all the works to ensure the protection of the collection, and Council will undertake further essential structural and building works to the house.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council receive and note this report.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

This report is to provide Councillors with an update on the status of works being undertaken at Tulkiyan Heritage House, 707 Pacific Highway, Gordon.

 

Background

 

Tulkiyan Heritage House, located at 707 Pacific Highway, Gordon, was designed by architect B.J. Waterhouse, and was built in 1914 for the Donaldson family. The Donaldson family lived in the house until 1993, although the property was gifted to Ku-ring-gai Council under a Deed of Gift in 1985.

 

As the owner of Tulkiyan, Council is entrusted by the community to provide stewardship and to ensure the property's efficient and effective management. Tulkiyan is a State Heritage listed property. It has been operating as a house museum with the assistance of community volunteers since 2000. Tulkiyan was closed to the public in 2012 due to public safety and non-compliance matters.

 

An Expression of Interest process (EOI), to identify a suitable organisation to manage Tulkiyan Heritage House, was conducted in 2015. The only submission received through the EOI process was from the Historic Houses Association of Australia Inc. (HHAA)

 

On 6 September 2016 Council resolved:

 

A.   That Council approve an agreement with the Historic Houses Association of Australia for the management of Tulkiyan Heritage House. This approval is made on the proviso that the terms of the agreement as stipulated by Council are agreeable to the fore mentioned association.

B.   That the Mayor and General Manager or their delegate be authorised to execute the necessary documentation.

C.   That Council authorise the affixing of the Common Seal of Council to the contract agreement.

D.   That Council approve additional funding of $100,924 for the necessary initial building works to be undertaken at Tulkiyan Heritage House.

E.   That the Historic Houses of Australia receive $75,000 pa (ex GST) as management fees for the management of Tulkiyan Heritage House.

F.   That Council approve an ongoing maintenance budget $37,700 per annum for Tulkiyan Heritage House.

G.   That staff identify the amount of $100,924 for initial building works, and $112,700 for annual management and maintenance costs, in the September 2016 quarterly budget review.

 

Following this resolution, in late September 2016, the hot water system in the laundry (scullery) room at Tulkiyan burst, resulting in steam damage throughout the ground floor of the house. The steam and moisture has resulted in mould and associated damage to contents, furniture, floor coverings and internal walls and ceilings, which has been mainly confined to the downstairs area of the house.

 

Comments

 

Due to the extent of the damage the HHAA was unable to progress the proposed agreement with Council to commence the management of Tulkiyan as a house museum.

 

Council’s risk and assurance team was advised of the accident immediately, and Council’s insurance company was notified. Tulkiyan was inspected by the risk team in October 2016, and access to the building was restricted pending a hygienist report on the safety conditions.

 

Council’s buildings and assets team managed the insurance claim with the insurance company’s loss assessor.

 

In June 2017, the Heritage Asset Advisory (HAA) unit, a specialist unit within Public Works Advisory, a division of NSW Department of Finance Services and Innovation, was commissioned by Council to undertake a pre-project scoping study and plan for the conservation of Tulkiyan House.

 

The study was to assess the condition of the building fabric and the heritage collections, and to provide a strategy for conservation and repairs, with indicative costings. The brief was also to respond to the insurance requirements for costs of remediation of building interior fabric and collections damaged by water and steam.

 

Council’s insurer appointed Riverwall Constructions to undertake remedial works in accordance with the conservation plan.

 

The result from Council’s insurance claim, to date, is as follows:

 

Council’s insurance claim

$ ex GST

Remediation of Internal Structure

                              69,918.50

Remediation of Contents

63,640.85

Packing, Storage - Contents

25,328.00

TOTAL

158,887.35

 

Interior works

 

In March 2017 the HHAA engaged conservation specialist Robert Griffin to oversee the HHAA involvement in the conservation project. Robert Griffin has significant experience with interior conservation programs at a number of historic properties including Rouse Hill House, Elizabeth Bay House and Government House, Sydney.

 

The HHAA, Robert Griffin and Riverwall Constructions will work with Council staff on the conservation program for the interior and collection at Tulkiyan. It is anticipated work will commence late November 2017.

 

The draft program of works includes:

 

·     Condition and conservation assessment of the interiors and collections including interior finishes such as plasterwork, paint finishes, wallpapers, joinery and collection items, furniture, textiles, works on paper and metals

·     The recruitment and training of volunteer teams, and planning, coordinating and supervising the activities of volunteers

·     Liaison with specialist conservators to undertake the conservation of individual items

·     Liaison with community groups and other relevant organisations to assist with and promote the conservation programs being undertaken

·     Participation in public programs and other activities that promote the conservation work at Tulkiyan

·     Regular reporting to Ku-ring-gai Council on the conservation program, including participation in meetings and liaison with staff.

 

Curatorial works

 

The HHAA has requested Council contribute $45,000 to the curatorial work being undertaken by Robert Griffin. This work includes producing photographic records of the entire contents, (including those that were not damaged by the accident), cleaning the contents and other associated works.

 

There are sufficient funds available in the 2017/18 Community budget, however a portion of this amount may be available through Council’s insurer. This matter is currently being negotiated with Council’s insurance company.

 

The HHAA will contribute in-kind support to the curatorial project through the co-ordination of over 20 volunteers.

 

Exterior works

 

Council’s Operations department has reviewed the budget estimates for the necessary work on the structure and supporting services at Tulkiyan. (These works refer to pre-existing problems and are not part of the insurance claim). Estimates are as follows:

 

•        Structural works $310,500 and

•        Sewer and stormwater repairs $48,000

 

Council’s Operations department has confirmed $358,500 is currently available from the 2017/18 budget to undertake the above works.

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Community, People and Culture

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

C1 - Community Wellbeing

 

C1.1 An equitable and inclusive community that cares and provides for its members

Our community facilities are accessible and function as cultural hubs to attract a range of users.

 

C2 - Cultural Diversity and Creativity

 

 

 

 

C4 - Healthy Lifestyles

 

 

 

 

 

 

P7   Enhancing community buildings and facilities 

 

 

 

 

P8  Improving the standard of our infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E3   Visitation opportunities

 

 

 

C2.1 A harmonious community that respects, appreciates, celebrates and learns from each other and values our evolving cultural identity.

 

C4.1 A community that embraces healthier lifestyle choices and practices.

 

 

 

 

P7.1   Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs.

 

P8.1   An improved standard of infrastructure that meets the community’s service level standards and Council’s

Obligations as the custodian of our community assets.

 

 

 

 

 

E3.1   Ku-ring-gai has a range of activities and experiences that attract visitors.  

 

 

 

Ku-ring-gai's rich cultural diversity and creativity is celebrated through programs and events.

 

 

A range of cultural, recreational and leisure facilities and activities are available to encourage social interaction and stimulate everyday wellbeing.

 

Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets.

 

 

Usage of existing community buildings and facilities is optimised.

 

Our public infrastructure and assets are planned, managed and funded to meet community expectations, defined levels of service and address inter-generational equity.

 

Tourism business has been strengthened and expanded.

 

Ku-ring-gai is marketed as a provider of a range of visitor activities and experiences.

 

Governance Matters

 

An Expression of Interest (EOI) process, to identify a suitable organisation to manage Tulkiyan Heritage House, was conducted in 2015. Council resolved on 6 September 2016 that staff develop an agreement with the HHAA to manage Tulkiyan as a house museum. In late September 2016 an accident occurred at Tulkiyan, resulting in water and steam damage.

 

Council staff have been managing an insurance claim with Council’s insurers since the accident and remediation works are about to commence at Tulkiyan.

 

Risk Management

 

Council’s Corporate Risk and Assurance team restricted access to Tulkiyan following the damage from the steam and water leak. All necessary risk procedures have been implemented following the hot water accident in September 2016.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Council resolved, on 6 September 2016 to provide $112,700 for annual management costs and maintenance for Tulkiyan. This amount has been included in the 2017/18 budget.

 

To date, Council’s insurance claim will provide $158,887.35 for the remediation works associated with the hot water accident at Tulkiyan.

 

Council’s Operations department has confirmed $358,500 is currently available from the 2017/18 budget to undertake necessary external works that are not associated with the insurance claim.

 

The HHAA has requested Council contribute $45,000 to the curatorial work and associated projects to be undertaken by Robert Griffin. There are sufficient funds available in the 2017/18 Community budget, however a portion of this amount may be available through Council’s insurer. This matter is currently being negotiated with Council’s insurance company.

 

Social Considerations

 

Tulkiyan is highly regarded as a heritage asset with the capacity to be developed as a cultural resource that compliments and works closely with nearby house museums, whilst also providing enjoyment and engagement in its own right.

 

Tulkiyan presents a complete and rare insight into earlier ways of living in Australia. The property was completed in 1914 and remains largely as it was at this time, with its integrity and intactness providing value to both the local and broader community. It is a living history time capsule of early 20th century life in Sydney.

 

It is expected that professional management of Tulkiyan house would also make a contribution to the local economy and cultural tourism in the Sydney region. HHAA considers that Tulkiyan has the potential to deliver a memorable 21st century museum experience to the Ku-ring-gai community and to a broader audience.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

There are no environmental issues associated with the writing of this report.

 

Community Consultation

 

There was no community consultation required with the writing of this report.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Staff from Council’s Corporate and Operations departments have been consulted in the writing of this report.

 

Summary

 

In September 2016 Council approved Historic Houses Association of Australia Inc. (HHAA) to manage Tulkiyan as a heritage house museum. HHAA has the staff, resourcing and programs suitable for achieving participation and engagement with this significant heritage property. 

 

A water leak in late September 2016 has resulted in moisture and mould issues. A conservation and remediation program has been developed with Council’s insurer, HHAA, Riverwall Constructions and relevant Council staff, to repair the damage and to address a number of pre-existing structural issues at the property.

 

It is expected the work will commence in November 2017 and take approximately 4 months to complete.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council receive and note this report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Taylor

Manager Community & Recreation Services

 

 

 

 

Janice Bevan

Director Community

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.2 / 52

 

 

Item GB.2

FY00430/9

 

20 September 2017

 

 

2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To advise Council of applications received for the 2017
Ku-ring-gai Community Grants program, and to recommend subsequent funding allocations to community groups.

 

 

background:

Each year Council calls for applications from community and cultural groups for grant funding to assist in providing services to the community. Applications totalling $136,317 have been received from 50 different groups for this year’s round of funding.

 

 

comments:

A total of $97,900 is available for the 2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program. The grants assessment panel has recommended a total of $97,867 for distribution to community groups.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council approve the recommendations in this report for funding of $97,867 for community and cultural groups.

 

 

 


Purpose of Report

To advise Council of applications received for the 2017
Ku-ring-gai Community Grants program, and to recommend subsequent funding allocations to community groups.  

 

Background

 

Each year Council calls for applications from community and cultural groups for grant funding to assist in providing services to the community. Applications totalling $136,317 have been received from 50 different groups for this year’s round of funding.

 

To assist groups in completing the applications forms, Council also conducted a Grant Submissions Workshop and Information Session to outline the funding guidelines, selection criteria and priority funding areas.

 

Comments

 

Council has $97,900 available in the 2017/18 budget for the 2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program. Applications for financial assistance (Attachments A1– A3) were assessed according to the criteria outlined in the 2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program and General Information and Guidelines (Attachment A4 – A7).

 

Following assessment, a sum of $93,667 for community groups, plus $4,200 for the rates and garbage rebate for Eryldene, (a standing resolution of Council), was recommended, totalling $97,867.    

 

Unfortunately not all the organisations that have applied have been recommended for financial assistance, and in some cases the full amount could not be granted.  

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

C1.1 An equitable and inclusive community that cares and provides for its members

 

C1.1.1 Council’s policies, programs and advocacy address the social and health needs of all age groups, reduce disadvantage and address gaps in service provision.

Resource and support local initiatives and organisations through the Ku-ring-gai Community Grants program.

 

 

Governance Matters

 

The 2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program is supported by adopted guidelines, funding categories, eligibility criteria and application and selection process information.

 

Risk Management

 

Priority funding areas have been identified for each category, e.g. Small Equipment, Community Development and Arts/Cultural grants, to assist all potential applicants. The program covers a range of projects and within each project there are a variety of associated risks. Council has in place a number of measures to mitigate those risks, including a formal Funding Agreement and Acquittal Process (Attachments A8, A9). Each organisation receiving funding must comply with the terms and conditions of the program.

 

Financial Considerations

 

Council has $97,900 available in the 2017/18 budget for the 2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program. From the total amount of $97,900, $93,667 will be distributed to community and cultural groups, and $4,200 will contribute to the rates and garbage rebate for Eryldene (a standing resolution of Council).

 

Social Considerations

 

The 2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program is supported by priority funding areas based on identified social and arts/cultural needs in the Ku-ring-gai area. A key component of this program is to provide opportunities for residents to participate and engage in their local community.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

The various projects funded under this program contribute to a sustainable community and some contain elements with environmental benefits.

 

Community Consultation

 

To assist groups in completing the applications forms, Council also conducted a Grant Submissions Workshop and Information Session to outline the funding guidelines, selection criteria and priority funding areas.

 

Internal Consultation

 

Corporate, Strategy and Environment and Operations Departments have been consulted in the writing of this report.

 

Summary

 

Projects funded under the 2017 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants Program cover a range of target groups including, children, young people, older people, people with disabilities and people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

 

The grants will enhance the capacity of community groups to provide much needed support services to the community. The arts/cultural projects proposed will foster celebrations and promote the development of artistic pursuits in Ku-ring-gai.

 

 

Recommendation:

A.   That the following community and cultural groups receive the recommended amount of financial assistance from Council in 2017.

 

1.   Category:  Small Equipment

 

Name of Organisation

Amount Recommended $

1

1st Gordon Scouts

2,000

2

1st Pymble Scouts Group – The Scout Association of Australia, NSW Branch

2,000

3

2nd Turramurra Scout Group

1,980

4

Easy Care Gardening

2,000

5

Fighting Chance Australia

1,716

6

Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Community College

840

7

Killara Bowling Club Limited

844

8

KU Killara Park Preschool

1,080

9

KU West Pymble Preschool

336

10

Ku-ring-gai Community Workshop "The Shed" Inc.

2,000

11

Ku-ring-gai Meals on Wheels Service

2,000

12

Ku-ring-gai Stealers Baseball League Inc

1,812

13

Ku-ring-gai Youth Orchestra

918

14

KYDS Youth Development Service Inc

2,000

15

Lindfield Bowling Club

Nil

16

Lindfield Girl Guides

1,750

17

Probus Club of Barra Brui Inc

1,810

18

Rotary Club of Ku-ring-gai Incorporated

2,000

19

Rotary Club of Wahroonga

Nil

20

St Andrew's Anglican Church Wahroonga

2,000

21

St Ives Netball Club

2,000

22

St Lucy’s School

1,840

23

St Matthew’s Anglican Church

2,000

24

Sydney U3A Incorporated

1,922

25

The Eryldene Trust

2,000

26

UTS Football Club

2,000

27

West Pymble Out of Hours School Care

1,763

28

West Pymble Scout Group

1,959

 

Total

$44,570

 

 

 

 

 

2.   Category:  Community Development

 

Name of Organisation

Amount Recommended $

1

Active Opportunities Inc

2,500

2

Evangelical Free Church of Australia

2,500

3

Fighting Chance Australia

2,800

4

KU West Pymble Preschool

1,100

5

Ku-ring-gai Community Workshop 'The Shed' Inc

2,500

6

Ku-ring-gai Division St John Ambulance NSW

2,920

7

Ku-ring-gai Stealers Baseball League Inc

2,500

8

Lindfield Bowling Club

Nil

9

Northside Community Forum Limited

2,500

10

NSW SLASA INC

2,000

11

Parkrun Australia

3,000

12

Rotary Club of St Ives INC

2,500

13

St James Church Turramurra for branch church Warrawee Anglican

1,000

14

StreetWork Incorporated

3,000

15

Studio ARTES Northside Inc

Nil

 

Total

$30,820

 

 

3.   Category:  Arts/Cultural

 

Name of Organisation

Amount Recommended $

1

Jewish Arts Incorporated

3,950

2

KU West Pymble Preschool

3,640

3

Ku-ring-gai Historical Society Inc

5,000

4

Ku-ring-gai Youth Orchestra

2,395

5

Northside Opera Study Group Inc

1,292

6

Studio ARTES Northside Inc

2,000

7

United Nations Association of Australia Peace Program

Nil

 

Total

$18,277

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Danny Houseas

Manager Community

 

 

 

 

Janice Bevan

Director Community

 

 

Attachments:

A1

KCG 2017 - Attachment A1 to report to Council - Small Equipment  - Individual assessments

 

2017/279595

 

A2

KCG 2017 - Attachment A2 to report to Council - Community Development - Individual assessments

 

2017/279660

 

A3

KCG 2017 - Attachment A3 to report to Council - Arts Cultural - Individual Assessments

 

2017/279661

 

A4

KCG 2017 - Attachment A4 KCGrants general info 2017

 

2017/302932

 

A5

KCG 2017 - Attachment A5 - Arts Cultural Guidelines

 

2017/302936

 

A6

KCG 2017 - Attachment A6 - Community Development Guidelines

 

2017/302938

 

A7

KCG 2017 - Attachment A7- Small Equipment Guidelines

 

2017/302940

 

A8

KCG 2017 - Attachment A8 Funding Agreement and Conditions of Funding

 

2017/302999

 

A9

KCG 2017 -  Attachment A9 Ku-ring-gai Community Grants 2017 Program Acquittal form

 

2017/303018

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.3 / 58

 

 

Item GB.3

CY00438/5

 

17 October 2017

 

 

Council Meeting Cycle for 2018

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To set the Council Meeting dates for 2018.

 

 

background:

Section 365 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that Council meet at least 10 times per year, each time in a different month.

It has been this Council’s practice to hold Ordinary Meetings of Council on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month, amending this pattern to avoid school holidays, public holidays, and other events that may make attendance difficult for Councillors and/or the public, as well as to go into recess from the first week of December to the end of January.

 

 

comments:

A draft Council Meeting cycle for 2018 has been prepared for consideration.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council adopt the proposed meeting dates for 2018.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To set the Council Meeting dates for 2018.

 

Background

Section 365 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that Council meet at least 10 times per year, each time in a different month.

 

Comments

At its meeting of 8 November 2016, Council resolved that the first and second Ordinary Meetings of Council for 2018 will be held on 6 and 27 February 2018, respectively.

 

It has been this Council’s practice to hold Ordinary Meetings of Council on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month, amending this pattern to avoid school holidays, public holidays, and other events that may make attendance difficult for Councillors and/or the public, as well as to go into recess from the first week of December to the end of January.

 

The school holiday periods for 2018 (as shown in Attachment A1) are listed below, along with the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the months affected by these holidays, and the proposed meeting dates for those months:

 

16 April 2018 to 27 April 2018

Dates affected: 24 April 2018

Action proposed: No meeting held on this date

 

9 July 2018 to 20 July 2018

Dates affected: 10 July 2018

Action proposed: No meeting held on this date

 

1 October 2018 to 12 October 2018

Dates affected: 9 October 2018

Action proposed: Meetings for October held on 16 & 30

                                              

24 December 2018 to 28 January 2019

No meetings affected.

 

Recess 2018/2019

It is proposed that the last Ordinary Meeting of Council for 2018 be held on the first Tuesday of the month, 4 December 2018, and that Council resume from the recess on Tuesday 12 February 2019.

 

The following state and national local government annual conferences have not affected the proposed dates provided below.

 

National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government Conference 17 – 20 June 2018

The National General Assembly (NGA) of Local Government Conference to be held from
17 – 20 June 2018 at the National Convention Centre, Canberra.

 

Local Government NSW Conference 21 – 23 October 2018

The tentative date for the 2018 Local Government NSW Annual Conference is
21 – 23 October 2018, at a venue yet to be advised.

 

 

The proposed scheduled meeting cycle for 2018 is as follows:

 

February

6 February 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

27 February 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

March

13 March 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

27 March 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

April

10 April 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

May

8 May 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

22 May 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

June

12 June 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

26 June 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

July

24 July 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

August

14 August 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

28 August 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

September

11 September 2018

25 September 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

Ordinary Meeting of Council

October

16 October 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

30 October 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

November

13 November 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

27 November 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

December

4 December 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

February

12 February 2019

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

26 February 2019

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

Leadership and Governance

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

Ensure effective and efficient conduct of Council and committee meetings for the benefit of councillors and the community.

 

Council's Governance framework is developed to ensure probity, transparency and the principles of sustainability are integrated and applied into our policies, plans, guidelines and decision-making processes.

Business Papers and associated Minutes are published in an accurate and timely manner for public scrutiny and encourage community participation.

 

 

Governance Matters

Section 365 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that Council meet at least 10 times per year, each time in a different month.

 

Risk Management

Nil.

 

Financial Considerations

Nil.

 

Social Considerations

Nil.

 

Environmental Considerations

Nil.

 

Community Consultation

None undertaken or required.

 

Internal Consultation

None undertaken or required.

 

Summary

Section 365 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) requires that Council meet at least 10 times per year, each time in a different month.

 

It has been this Council’s practice to hold Ordinary Meetings of Council on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month, amending this pattern to avoid school holidays, public holidays, and other events that may make attendance difficult for Councillors and/or the public, as well as to go into recess from the first week of December to the end of January.

 

A draft Council Meeting cycle for 2018 has been prepared for consideration.

Recommendation:

 

That Council sets the following Meeting dates:

 

February

6 February 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

27 February 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

March

13 March 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

27 March 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

April

10 April 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

May

8 May 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

22 May 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

June

12 June 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

26 June 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

July

24 July 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

August

14 August 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

28 August 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

September

11 September 2018

25 September 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

Ordinary Meeting of Council

October

16 October 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

30 October 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

November

13 November 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

27 November 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

December

4 December 2018

Ordinary Meeting of Council

February

12 February 2019

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

26 February 2019

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

 

 

 

 

Christine Dunand

Team Leader Governance

 

 

Amber Moloney

Manager Records and Governance

 

 

 

David Marshall

Director Corporate

 

 

Attachments:

A1

NSW Public School Holiday Dates 2018

 

2017/289983

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.4 / 63

 

 

Item GB.4

DA0205/17

 

1 November 2017

 

 

Supplementary Report - 16 Buckingham Road Killara

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To report on the site inspection on 1 November 2017 and to determine Development Application No. 0205/17 for the demolition of existing structures and two lot Torrens Title subdivision.

 

 

background:

An assessment report which recommended the approval of the application was considered by Council on 10 October 2017. Council resolved to defer determination pending a site inspection.

 

 

comments:

The site inspection was held on Wednesday 1 November 2017

 

 

recommendation:

Approval

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To report on the site inspection on 1 November 2017 and to determine Development Application No. 0205/17 for the demolition of existing structures and two lot Torrens Title subdivision.

 

Background

An assessment report which recommended the approval of the application was considered by Council on 10 October 2017. Council resolved to defer determination pending a site inspection. The site inspection took place on 1 November 2017.

 

All matters raised at the site inspection were addressed by the staff in attendance. There were no matters requiring further reporting to Council.

 

integrated planning and reporting

Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity of the character of Ku-ring-gai.

Applications are assessed in accordance with State and Local Plans.

 

Assessments are of a high quality, accurate and consider all relevant legislative requirements.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

THAT Council, as the consent authority, being satisfied that the proposed development will be in the public interest, grant development consent to DA0205/17 for the demolition of existing structures and a two lot Torrens title subdivision on land at 16 Buckingham Road, Killara 2071, subject to conditions. Pursuant to Section 95(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, the consent will lapse if the approved works are not physically commenced within two years of the date of the Notice of Determination.

 

Conditions that identify approved plans:

 

1.     Approved architectural plans and documentation (new development)

 

The development must be carried out in accordance with the following plans and documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s stamp, except where amended by other conditions of this consent:

 

Plan no.

Drawn by

Dated

D1 Issue D

ACOR Consultants

15.09.17

D2 Issue D

ACOR Consultants

15.09.17

D3 Issue D

ACOR Consultants

15.09.17

D4 Issue D

ACOR Consultants

15.09.17

D5 Issue D

ACOR Consultants

15.09.17

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

2.     Inconsistency between documents

 

In the event of any inconsistency between conditions of this consent and the drawings/documents referred to above, the conditions of this consent prevail.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to demolition, excavation or construction:

 

3.     Asbestos works

 

All work involving asbestos products and materials, including asbestos-cement-sheeting (ie. Fibro), must be carried out in accordance with the guidelines for asbestos work published by WorkCover Authority of NSW.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

4.     Notice of commencement

 

At least 48 hours prior to the commencement of any development (including demolition, excavation, shoring or underpinning works), a notice of commencement of building or subdivision work form and appointment of the principal certifying authority form shall be submitted to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

5.     Notification of builder’s details

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be notified in writing of the name and contractor licence number of the owner/builder intending to carry out the approved works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

6.     Archival recording of buildings

 

Prior to the commencement of any development or excavation works on site, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that an archival report has been submitted to Council’s Heritage Advisor.

 

The report must consist of an archival standard photographic record of the building (internally and externally), its garden and views of it from the street illustrating its relationship to neighbouring properties and the streetscape. Recording shall be undertaken in accordance with the guidelines for “Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006)” prepared by the New South Wales Heritage Office.

 

Information shall be bound in an A4 report format.  It shall include copies of photographs, referenced to plans of the site.  Two (2) copies (one (1) copy to include negatives or CD of images shall be submitted to Council's Heritage Advisor.  The recording document will be held in the local studies collection of Ku-ring-gai Library, the local historical society and Council’s files.

 

Note:    A written acknowledgment from Council must be obtained (attesting to this condition being appropriately satisfied) and submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure the proper management of historical artefacts and to ensure their preservation.

 

7.     Sediment controls

 

Prior to any work commencing on site, sediment and erosion control measures shall be installed along the contour immediately downslope of any future disturbed areas.

 

The form of the sediment controls to be installed on the site shall be determined by reference to the Landcom manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction’. The erosion controls shall be maintained in an operational condition until the development activities have been completed and the site fully stabilised. Sediment shall be removed from the sediment controls following each heavy or prolonged rainfall period.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

8.     Erosion and drainage management

 

Earthworks and/or demolition of any existing buildings shall not commence until an erosion and sediment control plan is submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority. The plan shall comply with the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual "Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction" certificate. Erosion and sediment control works shall be implemented in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan.

 

Reason:         To preserve and enhance the natural environment.

 

9.     Tree protection fencing

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the area beneath their canopy is fenced off as per Appendix 6 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated 17/05/2017. In addition, the following trees shall be fenced off at the specified radius from the trunk/s to prevent any activities, storage or the disposal of materials within the fenced area.  The fence/s shall be maintained intact until the completion of all demolition/building work on site.

 

Tree/Location

Radius in metres

T25a Waterhousea floribunda (Weeping Lillypilly)

Northern site boundary

3.0m

T28 Harpephyllum caffrum (Kaffir Plum)

Adjacent to north-east site corner

6.0m

T31- T33 Syzigium paniculatum (Magenta Cherry)

Adjacent to south-east site corner

4.5m

T34 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

Adjacent to southern site boundary

8.0m

T35 Camellia sasanqua

Southern side of existing dwelling

2.5m

T36 Juniperous spp (Juniper)

Adjacent to southern site boundary

8.5m

T37 Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet Gum)

Adjacent to southern site boundary

4.0m north, 7.0m elsewhere

T45 Lagerstroemia indica (Crepe Myrtle)

Centrally within driveway turning circle

2.5m

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

10.   Tree protective fencing type galvanised mesh

 

The tree protection fencing shall be constructed of galvanised pipe at 2.4 metre spacing and connected by securely attached chain mesh fencing to a minimum height of 1.8 metres in height prior to work commencing.

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees during construction phase.

 

11.   Tree protection signage

 

Prior to works commencing, tree protection signage is to be attached to each tree protection zone, displayed in a prominent position and the sign repeated at 10 metres intervals or closer where the fence changes direction.  Each sign shall contain in a clearly legible form, the following information:

 

·           Tree protection zone.

·           This fence has been installed to prevent damage to the trees and their growing environment both above and below ground and access is restricted.

·           The name, address, and telephone number of the developer.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

12.   Tree protection - avoiding soil compaction

 

To preserve all retained trees within the access handle, no work shall commence until temporary measures to avoid soil compaction (eg rumble boards) in accordance with AS4970-2009 for the length of the access handle is installed. The ground protection measures shall remain in place until the construction of the proposed driveway:

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

13.   Trunk protection

 

To preserve the following tree/s, no work shall commence until the trunk/s are protected by the placement of 2.0 metres lengths of 50 x 100mm hardwood timbers spaced at 150mm centres and secured by 2mm wire at 300mm wide spacing over suitable protective padding material.  The trunk protection shall be maintained intact until the completion of all work on site.

 

Any damage to the tree/s shall be treated immediately by an experienced AQF3 Horticulturist/Arborist, and a report detailing the works carried out shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority:

 

Tree/Location

T5 Cupressus spp (Cypress Pine)

Access handle

T6 Ulmus parvifolia (Chinese Elm)

Access handle

T7 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda)

Access handle

T10 Eucalyptus saligna (Blue Gum)

Access handle

T15a Harpephyllum caffrum (Kaffir Plum)

Access handle

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

14.   Tree fencing inspection

 

Upon installation of the required tree protection measures, a joint inspection of the site by the Project Arborist and Principal Certifying Authority is required to verify that tree protection measures comply with all relevant conditions.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees during the construction phase.

 

15.   Construction waste management plan

 

Prior to the commencement of any works, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that a waste management plan, prepared by a suitably qualified person, has been prepared in accordance with Council’s Waste Management controls in the Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan.

 

The plan shall address all issues identified in the DCP, including but not limited to: the estimated volume of waste and method for disposal for the construction and operation phases of the development.

 

Note:     The plan shall be provided to the Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure appropriate management of construction waste.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate:

 

16.   Long service levy

 

In accordance with Section 109F(i) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act a Construction Certificate shall not be issued until any long service levy payable under Section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 (or where such levy is payable by instalments, the first instalment of the levy) has been paid. Council is authorised to accept payment. Where payment has been made elsewhere, proof of payment is to be provided to Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

17.   Builder’s indemnity insurance

 

The applicant, builder, developer or person who does the work on this development, must arrange builder’s indemnity insurance and submit the certificate of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Part 6 of the Home Building Act 1989 to the Certifying Authority for endorsement of the plans accompanying the Construction Certificate.

 

It is the responsibility of the applicant, builder or developer to arrange the builder's indemnity insurance for residential building work over the value of $20,000. The builder's indemnity insurance does not apply to commercial or industrial building work or to residential work valued at less than $20,000, nor to work undertaken by persons holding an owner/builder's permit issued by the Department of Fair Trading (unless the owner/builder's property is sold within 7 years of the commencement of the work).

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

18.   Driveway crossing levels

 

Prior to issue of the Construction Certificate, driveway and associated footpath levels for any new, reconstructed or extended sections of driveway crossings between the property boundary and road alignment must be obtained from Ku-ring-gai Council. Such levels are only able to be issued by Council under the Roads Act 1993.  All footpath crossings, laybacks and driveways are to be constructed according to Council's specifications "Construction of Gutter Crossings and Footpath Crossings".

 

Specifications are issued with alignment levels after completing the necessary application form at Customer Services and payment of the assessment fee. When completing the request for driveway levels application from Council, the applicant must attach a copy of the relevant development application drawing which indicates the position and proposed level of the proposed driveway at the boundary alignment.

 

This development consent is for works wholly within the property. Development consent does not imply approval of footpath or driveway levels, materials or location within the road reserve, regardless of whether this information is shown on the development application plans. The grading of such footpaths or driveways outside the property shall comply with Council's standard requirements.  The suitability of the grade of such paths or driveways inside the property is the sole responsibility of the applicant and the required alignment levels fixed by Council may impact upon these levels.

 

The construction of footpaths and driveways outside the property in materials other than those approved by Council is not permitted.

 

Reason:         To provide suitable vehicular access without disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

 

 

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of the construction certificate or prior to demolition, excavation or construction (whichever comes first):

 

19.   Infrastructure damage security bond and inspection fee

 

To ensure that any damage to Council property as a result of construction activity is rectified in a timely matter:

 

(a)      All work or activity undertaken pursuant to this development consent must be undertaken in a manner to avoid damage to Council property and must not jeopardise the safety of any person using or occupying the adjacent public areas.

 

(b)      The applicant, builder, developer or any person acting in reliance on this consent shall be responsible for making good any damage to Council property and for the removal from Council property of any waste bin, building materials, sediment, silt, or any other material or article.

 

(c)      The Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee must be paid to Council by the applicant prior to both the issue of the Construction Certificate and the commencement of any earthworks or construction.

 

(d)      In consideration of payment of the infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee, Council will undertake such inspections of Council Property as Council considers necessary and will also undertake, on behalf of the applicant, such restoration work to Council property, if any, that Council considers necessary as a consequence of the development. The provision of such restoration work by the Council does not absolve any person of the responsibilities contained in (a) to (b) above. Restoration work to be undertaken by Council referred to in this condition is limited to work that can be undertaken by Council at a cost of not more than the Infrastructure damage security bond payable pursuant to this condition.

 

(e)      In this condition:

 

“Council property” includes any road, footway, footpath paving, kerbing, guttering, crossings, street furniture, seats, letter bins, trees, shrubs, lawns, mounds, bushland, and similar structures or features on any road or public road within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) or any public place; and

 

“Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee” means the Infrastructure damage security bond and infrastructure inspection fee as calculated in accordance with the Schedule of Fees & Charges adopted by Council as at the date of payment and the cost of any inspections required by the Council of Council property associated with this condition.

 

Reason:          To maintain public infrastructure.

 

 

 

 

 

20.   Section 94 development contributions - other than identified centres

        (For DAs determined on or after 19 December 2010).

 

This development is subject to a development contribution calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, being a s94 Contributions Plan in effect under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, as follows:

 

Key Community Infrastructure

Amount

Local recreation and cultural facilities;  Local social facilities

$3,036.54

Local parks and local sporting facilities

$21,749.41

Total:

$24,785.95

 

The contribution shall be paid to Council prior to the issue of any Construction Certificate, Linen Plan, Certificate of Subdivision or Occupation Certificate whichever comes first in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

The contributions specified above are subject to indexation and may vary at the time of payment in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 to reflect changes in the consumer price index and housing price index.  Prior to payment, please contact Council directly to verify the current payable contributions.

 

Copies of Council’s Contribution Plans can be viewed at Council Chambers, 818 Pacific Hwy Gordon or on Council’s website at www.kmc.nsw.gov.au.

 

Contributions outside the designated centres may be subject to a maximum contribution total in accordance with the s94E Direction issued by the Minister for Planning dated 21 August 2012, for so long as it remains legally in force.  If the total amount above is an exact multiple of $20,000 then the contributions calculated in accordance with Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 exceeded the maximum contribution payable and have been capped.  If the process of inflation carries the contribution above over the maximum amount permitted by the s94E Direction prior to payment, the amount will be limited at time of receipt.  Please contact Council to verify the total contributions payable prior to payment.

 

Reason:       To ensure the provision, extension or augmentation of the Key Community Infrastructure identified in Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 that will, or is likely to be, required as a consequence of the development.

 

Conditions to be satisfied during the demolition, excavation and construction phases:

 

21.   Road opening permit

 

The opening of any footway, roadway, road shoulder or any part of the road reserve shall not be carried out without a road opening permit being obtained from Council (upon payment of the required fee) beforehand.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement (Roads Act 1993 Section 138) and to maintain the integrity of Council’s infrastructure.

 

22.   Prescribed conditions

 

The applicant shall comply with any relevant prescribed conditions of development consent under clause 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation. For the purposes of section 80A (11) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, the following conditions are prescribed in relation to a development consent for development that involves any building work:

 

·          the work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia

 

·          in the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any works commence

 

·          if the development involves an excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building, structure or work (including any structure or work within a road or rail corridor) on adjoining land, the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense:

 

(a)      protect and support the building, structure or work from possible damage from the excavation, and

(b)      where necessary, underpin the building, structure or work to prevent any such damage.

 

Reason:       Statutory requirement.

 

23.   Hours of work

 

Demolition, construction work and deliveries of building material and equipment must not take place outside the hours of 7.00am to 5.00pm Monday to Friday and 8.00am to 12 noon Saturday. No work and no deliveries are to take place on Sundays and public holidays.

 

Excavation using machinery must be limited to between 7.00am and 5.00pm Monday to Friday, with a respite break of 45 minutes between 12 noon and 1.00pm.  No excavation using machinery is to occur on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays.

 

Where it is necessary for works to occur outside of these hours (ie) placement of concrete for large floor areas on large residential/commercial developments or where building processes require the use of oversized trucks and/or cranes that are restricted by the RTA from travelling during daylight hours to deliver, erect or remove machinery, tower cranes, pre-cast panels, beams, tanks or service equipment to or from the site, approval for such activities will be subject to the issue of an "outside of hours works permit" from Council as well as notification of the surrounding properties likely to be affected by the proposed works.

 

Note:     Failure to obtain a permit to work outside of the approved hours will result in on the spot fines being issued.

 

Reason:         To ensure reasonable standards of amenity for occupants of neighbouring properties.

 

24.   Approved plans to be on site

 

A copy of all approved and certified plans, specifications and documents incorporating conditions of consent and certification (including the Construction Certificate if required for the work) shall be kept on site at all times during the demolition, excavation and construction phases and must be readily available to any officer of Council or the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

25.   Statement of compliance with Australian Standards

 

The demolition work shall comply with the provisions of Australian Standard AS2601: 2001 The Demolition of Structures. The work plans required by AS2601: 2001 shall be accompanied by a written statement from a suitably qualified person that the proposal contained in the work plan comply with the safety requirements of the Standard. The work plan and the statement of compliance shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with the Australian Standards.

 

26.   Site notice

 

A site notice shall be erected on the site prior to any work commencing and shall be displayed throughout the works period.

 

The site notice must:

 

·           be prominently displayed at the boundaries of the site for the purposes of informing the public that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

·           display project details including, but not limited to the details of the builder, Principal Certifying Authority and structural engineer

·           be durable and weatherproof

·           display the approved hours of work, the name of the site/project manager, the responsible managing company (if any), its address and 24 hour contact phone number for any inquiries, including construction/noise complaint are to be displayed on the site notice

·           be mounted at eye level on the perimeter hoardings/fencing and is to state that unauthorised entry to the site is not permitted

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety and public information.

 

27.   Dust control

 

During excavation, demolition and construction, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent dust from affecting the amenity of the neighbourhood. The following measures must be adopted:

 

·           physical barriers shall be erected at right angles to the prevailing wind direction or shall be placed around or over dust sources to prevent wind or activity from generating dust

·           earthworks and scheduling activities shall be managed to coincide with the next stage of development to minimise the amount of time the site is left cut or exposed

·           all materials shall be stored or stockpiled at the best locations

·           the ground surface should be dampened slightly to prevent dust from becoming airborne but should not be wet to the extent that run-off occurs

·           all vehicles carrying spoil or rubble to or from the site shall at all times be covered to prevent the escape of dust

·           all equipment wheels shall be washed before exiting the site using manual or automated sprayers and drive-through washing bays

·           gates shall be closed between vehicle movements and shall be fitted with shade cloth

·           cleaning of footpaths and roadways shall be carried out daily

 

Reason:         To protect the environment and amenity of surrounding properties.

 

28.   Use of road or footpath

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, no building materials, plant or the like are to be stored on the road or footpath without written approval being obtained from Council beforehand.  The pathway shall be kept in a clean, tidy and safe condition during building operations.  Council reserves the right, without notice, to rectify any such breach and to charge the cost against the applicant/owner/builder, as the case may be.

 

Reason:         To ensure safety and amenity of the area.

 

29.   Guarding excavations

 

All excavation, demolition and construction works shall be properly guarded and protected with hoardings or fencing to prevent them from being dangerous to life and property.

 

Reason:         To ensure public safety.

 

30.   Toilet facilities

 

During excavation, demolition and construction phases, toilet facilities are to be provided, on the work site, at the rate of one toilet for every 20 persons or part of 20 persons employed at the site.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

31.   Protection of public places

 

If the work involved in the erection, demolition or construction of the development is likely to cause pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place to be obstructed or rendered inconvenient, or building involves the enclosure of a public place, a hoarding or fence must be erected between the work site and the public place.

 

If necessary, a hoarding is to be erected, sufficient to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work falling into the public place.

 

The work site must be kept lit between sunset and sunrise if it is likely to be hazardous to persons in the public place.

 

Any hoarding, fence or awning is to be removed when the work has been completed.

 

Reason:         To protect public places.

 

32.   Recycling of building material (general)

 

During demolition and construction, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that building materials suitable for recycling have been forwarded to an appropriate registered business dealing in recycling of materials. Materials to be recycled must be kept in good order.

 

Reason:         To facilitate recycling of materials.

 

33.   Construction signage

 

All construction signs must comply with the following requirements:

 

·           are not to cover any mechanical ventilation inlet or outlet vent

·           are not illuminated, self-illuminated or flashing at any time

·           are located wholly within a property where construction is being undertaken

·           refer only to the business(es) undertaking the construction and/or the site at which the construction is being undertaken

·           are restricted to one such sign per property

·           do not exceed 2.5m2

·           are removed within 14 days of the completion of all construction works

 

Reason:         To ensure compliance with Council's controls regarding signage.

 

34.   Road reserve safety

 

All public footways and roadways fronting and adjacent to the site must be maintained in a safe condition at all times during the course of the development works. Construction materials must not be stored in the road reserve. A safe pedestrian circulation route and a pavement/route free of trip hazards must be maintained at all times on or adjacent to any public access ways fronting the construction site.  Where public infrastructure is damaged, repair works must be carried out when and as directed by Council officers. Where pedestrian circulation is diverted on to the roadway or verge areas, clear directional signage and protective barricades must be installed in accordance with AS1742-3 (1996) “Traffic Control Devices for Work on Roads”. If pedestrian circulation is not satisfactorily maintained across the site frontage, and action is not taken promptly to rectify the defects, Council may undertake proceedings to stop work.

 

Reason:         To ensure safe public footways and roadways during construction.

 

35.   Services

 

Where required, the adjustment or inclusion of any new utility service facilities must be carried out by the applicant and in accordance with the requirements of the relevant utility authority. These works shall be at no cost to Council. It is the applicants’ full responsibility to make contact with the relevant utility authorities to ascertain the impacts of the proposal upon utility services (including water, phone, gas and the like). Council accepts no responsibility for any matter arising from its approval to this application involving any influence upon utility services provided by another authority.

 

Reason:         Provision of utility services.

 

36.   Erosion control

 

Temporary sediment and erosion control and measures are to be installed prior to the commencement of any works on the site. These measures must be maintained in working order during construction works up to completion. All sediment traps must be cleared on a regular basis and after each major storm and/or as directed by the Principal Certifying Authority and Council officers.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment from erosion and sedimentation.

 

37.   Arborist’s report

 

The tree/s to be retained shall be inspected, monitored and treated by a qualified AQF5 Arborist during and after completion of development works to ensure their long term survival.  Regular inspections and documentation from the Project Arborist to the Principal Certifying Authority are required at the following times or phases of work:

 

Tree/Location

Time of inspection

All retained trees On site and within 5.0m of site boundaries

*Certification of tree protection requirements as per consent conditions *Direct supervision of demolition works within the tree protection zone of retained trees *Direct supervision of installation of underground services *At the completion of all works on site

 

Reason:         To ensure protection of existing trees.

 

38.   Treatment of tree roots

 

If tree roots are severed for the purposes of constructing the approved works, they shall be cut cleanly by hand, by an experienced AQF3 Arborist/Horticulturist. All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

39.   Demolition works

 

To protect retained trees demolition works shall be undertaken in accordance with Section 10.5 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated 17/05/2017

 

Reason:       To protect existing trees.

 

40.   Cutting of tree roots

 

No tree roots of 30mm or greater in diameter located within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be severed or injured in the process of any works during the construction period.  All pruning works shall be undertaken as specified in Australian Standard 4373-2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

All retained trees on site and within 5.0m of site boundaries

As per Tree Protection Zone detailed within Appendix 4 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated 17/05/2017

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

41.   Approved tree works

 

Approval is given for the following works to be undertaken to trees on the site:

 

Tree/Location

Approved tree works

T11 Grevillea robusta (Sliky Oak)

Access handle

Removal

T12, T13, T14 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) Access handle

Removal

T12a Harpephyllum caffrum (Kaffir Plum)

Access handle

Removal

 

Removal or pruning of any other tree on the site is not approved, excluding species exempt under Council’s Development Control Plan.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

42.   Hand excavation

 

All excavation within the specified radius of the trunk/s of the following tree/s shall be hand dug:

 

Tree/Location

Radius from trunk

All retained trees on site and within 5.0m of site boundaries

As per Tree Protection Zone detailed within Appendix 4 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report by Earthscape Horticultural Services dated 17/05/2017

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

43.   Thrust boring/directional drilling

 

Excavation for the installation of any services on site as detailed on Plan D3 Rev D by Acor Consultants shall utilise the thrust boring/directional drilling method.  Thrust boring shall be carried out at least 800mm beneath natural ground level to minimise damage to tree/s root system. Thrust boring/directional drilling shall also be used to install the 150mm PVC pipeline under the existing driveway crossing of No. 18 Buckingham Road, Killara. 

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees and the existing driveway crossover of the adjacent property.

 

44.   No storage of materials beneath trees

 

No activities, storage or disposal of materials shall take place beneath the canopy of any tree protected under Council's Tree Preservation Order at any time.

 

Reason:         To protect existing trees.

 

45.   Removal of refuse

 

All builders' refuse, spoil and/or material unsuitable for use in landscape areas shall be removed from the site on completion of the building works.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

46.   On site retention of waste dockets

 

All demolition, excavation and construction waste dockets are to be retained on site, or at suitable location, in order to confirm which facility received materials generated from the site for recycling or disposal.

 

·           Each docket is to be an official receipt from a facility authorised to accept the material type, for disposal or processing.

·           This information is to be made available at the request of an Authorised Officer of Council.

 

Reason:       To protect the environment.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate:

 

47.   Certification of drainage works

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·           the components of the new drainage system have been installed by a licensed contractor in accordance with the National Plumbing and Drainage Code AS3500.3 (2003) and the Building Code of Australia

·           the stormwater drainage works have been completed in accordance with the approved Construction Certificate drainage plans and Ku-ring-gai DCP Part 24 'Water Management'.

 

Note:     Evidence from the plumbing contractor or a qualified civil/hydraulic engineer confirming compliance with this control is to be provided to Council prior to the issue of Subdivision Certificate.

 

Reason:         To protect the environment.

 

48.   Certification of as-constructed driveway

 

Prior to issue of Subdivision Certificate, the Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that:

 

·           the as-constructed driveway complies with the approved Construction Certificate plans;

 

·           the completed vehicle access and accommodation arrangements comply with Australian Standard 2890.1 - 2004 “Off-Street car parking";

 

·           finished driveway gradients and transitions will not result in the scraping of the underside of cars.

 

Note:     Evidence from a suitably qualified and experienced traffic/civil engineer indicating compliance with the above is to be provided to and approved by the Certifying Authority prior to the issue of Subdivision Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure that vehicular access and accommodation areas are compliant with the consent.

 

49.   Infrastructure repair

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority must be satisfied that any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) is fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

Conditions to be satisfied prior to the issue of a Subdivision certificate:

 

50.   Demolition of structures

 

Prior to the release of the Subdivision Certificate, the Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the existing dwelling and associated structures have been demolished and removed from the site.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is in accordance with the determination.

 

51.   Sydney Water Section 73 Compliance Certificate

 

Prior to release of the linen plan/issue of the subdivision certificate, the Section 73 Sydney Water compliance certificate which refers to the subdivision application must be obtained and submitted to the Council.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

52.   Requirements of public authorities for connection to services

 

Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the Principal Certifying Authority shall be satisfied that the applicant has complied with the requirements of any public authorities (e.g. Energy Australia, Sydney Water, Telstra Australia, AGL, etc) in regard to the connection, relocation and/or adjustment of the services affected by the proposed subdivision. All costs related to the relocation, adjustment or support of services are the responsibility of the applicant.

 

Note:     Details of compliance with the requirements of any relevant public authorities are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that services are available to the allotments of land.

 

53.   Reinstatement of crossings

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the principal Certifying Authority is to be satisfied that following works have been completed:

 

·           construction of the new driveway crossing and layback in accordance with the levels and specifications issued by Council

·           removal of all redundant driveway crossings, pipe crossing and/or kerb laybacks. Full reinstatement of these sections to footway, and/or turfed verge and/or kerb and gutter to the satisfaction of Council

·           reinstatement works match surrounding adjacent infrastructure with respect to marrying of levels and materials

·           any sections of damaged grass verge are to be replaced with a non-friable turf of native variety to match existing

·           any damaged public infrastructure caused as a result of construction works on the subject site (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concrete vehicles) has been repaired to the satisfaction of Council and at no cost to Council

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure and the streetscape.

 

54.   Construction of works in public road

 

Prior issue of the Subdivision Certificate all road, footpath and/or drainage works in the public road must be completed in full, inspected and approved by Council. The applicant’s designing engineer is to provide certification upon completion that the works were constructed in accordance with the Council approved drawings.  This certification shall be provided prior to release of the linen plan/issue of the Subdivision Certificate. The completed works are to be approved by Council’s Development Engineer prior to release of the linen plan/issue of the Subdivision Certificate.

 

Reason:         To ensure completion of all road, footpath and/or drainage works in the public road.

 

 

55.   Infrastructure repair – subdivision works

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, any infrastructure within the road reserve along the frontage of the subject site or within close proximity, which has been damaged as a result of subdivision works, must be fully repaired to the satisfaction of Council’s Development Engineer and at no cost to Council.

 

Reason:         To protect public infrastructure.

 

56.   Provision of services

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, separate underground electricity, gas and phone or appropriate conduits for the same, must be provided to each allotment to the satisfaction of the utility provider. A suitably qualified and experienced engineer or surveyor is to provide certification that all new lots have ready underground access to the services of electricity, gas and phone. Alternatively, a letter from the relevant supply authorities stating the same may be submitted to satisfy this condition.

 

Reason:         Access to public utilities.

 

57.   Issue of Subdivision Certificate

 

The Subdivision Certificate must not be issued until all conditions of development consent have been satisfied and a Subdivision Certificate has been issued by the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that the development is completed prior to transfer of responsibility for the site and development to another person.

 

58.   Submission of 88b instrument

 

Prior to the issue of the Subdivision Certificate, the applicant must submit an original instrument under Section 88B of the Conveyancing Act with the plan of subdivision, plus six (6) copies to Council. Ku-ring-gai Council must be named as the authority whose consent is required to release, vary or modify the burdens.

 

Reason:         To create all required easements, rights-of-carriageway, positive covenants, restrictions-on-use or other burdens/benefits as may be required.

 

59.   Submission of plans of subdivision (Torrens title)

 

For endorsement of the subdivision certificate, the applicant shall submit an original plan of subdivision plus 6 copies, suitable for endorsement by Council. The following details must be submitted with the plan of subdivision and its copies:

 

a)         the endorsement fee current a the time of lodgement

b)         the 88B instrument plus 6 copies

c)         a copy of the Subdivision Certificate issued for DA0205/17

d)         all surveyor’s and/or consulting engineers’ certification(s) required under this subdivision consent

e)         The Section 73 (Sydney Water) Compliance Certificate for the subdivision.

f)          Proof of payment of S94 contribution

 

Council will check the consent conditions on the subdivision. Failure to submit the required information will delay endorsement of the linen plan and may require payment of rechecking fees. Plans and copies of subdivision must not be folded. Council will not accept bonds in lieu of completing subdivision works.

 

Reason:         Statutory requirement.

 

60.   General easement/R.O.W. provision and certification

 

Prior to issue of the Subdivision Certificate, a registered surveyor is to provide details to Council that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.  Alternatively, where the surveyor is of the opinion that creation of burdens and benefits is not required, then proof to this effect must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

Reason:         To ensure that all physical structures are fully contained within the proposed allotments or will be fully covered by the proposed burdens upon registration of the final plan of subdivision.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stuart Ratcliff

Senior Development Assessment Officer

 

 

 

 

Selwyn Segall

Team Leader - Development Assessment South

 

 

 

 

Corrie Swanepoel

Manager Development Assessment Services

 

 

 

 

Michael Miocic

Director Development & Regulation

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Report to Council Meeting of 10 October 2017

 

2017/241302

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.5 / 82

 

 

Item GB.5

S06785/3

 

31 May 2017

 

 

Update Report on the Development Contributions System

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of key activities and highlights in the development contributions system over the past six months and anticipated actions and highlights for the coming twelve months.  It has been presented twice a year since 2011/2012.

 

 

background:

Development contributions are a whole-of-Council activity, encompassing policy development, development assessment, customer services, financial management, project management and the delivery of community assets.  Many staff are involved in the delivery of community infrastructure wholly or partly funded by development contributions.  In this context, ‘development contributions’ means all aspects of the development contributions system under Division 6 Development Contributions, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979.

 

 

comments:

This report focuses on key highlights of the development contributions system.  More technical detail on particular key projects and financial management can be found in the quarterly and annual financial reports and annual delivery programmes as well as project-specific reports for large items of community infrastructure.

 

 

recommendation:

That the information in the report be received and noted and the contributions plans and policies be scheduled for updating concurrent with the broader strategic planning framework.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an overview of key activities and highlights in the development contributions system over the past six months and anticipated actions and highlights for the coming twelve months.  It has been presented twice a year since 2011/2012.

 

Background

The development contributions system includes all aspects of Division 6 Development Contributions, being a division of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as they relate to the Ku-ring-gai LGA including: planning agreements, local infrastructure contributions under s94 and s94A, Ministerial Directions under s94E and other technical aspects of this system.

 

Accordingly, the “Update Report on the Development Contribution System” includes summary overviews of highlights and other relevant matters that have arisen since the previous report – for the s94 Contributions Plan, the s94A Contributions Plan, Voluntary Planning Agreements under s93F, Ministerial Directions under s94E and other related matters covered by this division (Division 6 Development Contributions under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979).

 

Development contributions are a whole-of-Council activity, encompassing policy development, development assessment, customer service, financial management (including works programme cash-flow) and project management and delivery of community assets.

 

Contributions update reports have been presented to Council twice a year since 2011/2012.  Past Contributions update reports have highlighted the opening of new parks delivered by monetary development contributions; the adoption of Ku-ring-gai’s first s94A Contributions Plan (also known as an ‘indirect’ contributions plan) and improved web pages for contributions; Turramurra Community Hub project; Lindfield Community Hub and Village Green projects; progress on the Open Space Acquisition Strategy; new parks and civic spaces; as well as general updates on works in progress, land acquisition and community consultation. 

 

General housekeeping matters concerning the management of the development contributions system are often also foreshadowed to keep Council informed of matters arising, ahead of more detailed project-specific reports.

 

This report focuses on 18 months of operation of Ku-ring-gai s 94A Contributions Plan 2015 and foreshadows its review.

 

Comments

Ku-ring-gai LGA has two contributions plans.  The main contributions plan is Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 which is a ‘direct’ s94 contributions plan.  The term ‘direct’ means there needs to be a direct nexus between the new development and the proposed infrastructure funded by those contributions – and the contribution rate is a mathematical function of the estimated cost of the proposed infrastructure required to support new development divided by the extent of that contributing development (per capita or by trip generation).  Where the infrastructure is also required to support the existing population – such as community facilities and libraries, there is a co-contribution required from Council to ensure that new development is only paying its fair share.  This is known as apportionment.

 

Direct nexus is generally expressed in three terms: causal, geographic and temporal.  This means that there needs to be a causal relationship between new development (nett additional population or traffic generation) and the infrastructure proposed to be provided (whether this is fully-funded or apportioned, if required, with existing development so that new development only pays its fair share).  There needs to reasonable geographic proximity between the contributing development and the proposed infrastructure – which is often addressed within contributions plans by catchments or by a series of interconnected smaller scale facilities, or a combination of these approaches.  Where infrastructure is provided to facilitate access, however, such as linking to a pedestrian or cycle network, delivering people to/from public transport nodes, or providing circulation via new roads and laneways, nexus can be more geographically broadly interpreted.

 

Lastly, the facilities need to be provided within a reasonable time of the demand being generated by development, which Ku-ring-gai addresses by having a rolling works programme and a mixture of smaller and larger projects wholly or partly funded by contributions.

 

The 2010 Contributions Plan funds the full or partial delivery of significant infrastructure supporting intensive redevelopment.  It is particularly focused around the local centres along the Pacific Highway and St Ives where the majority of higher density redevelopment is taking place but also levies new residential redevelopment outside the local centres where new dwellings are being created – since the majority of community facilities are centrally located& accessible by public transport and a network of parks, levied per capita, can be delivered all over the LGA. 

 

This main contributions plan, Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, will be reviewed in 2018 concurrent with the wider strategic planning in response to the release of documents by the Greater Sydney Commission.

 

Exhibited in 2015 and coming into effect on 27 March 2016, Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015 is an ‘indirect’ s94A Contributions Plan.  Indirect contributions do not have the same onus of proof of nexus but must still be committed to a reasonable works programme listed within the contributions plan.  The contribution rate is a percentage of the cost of the proposed development up to a maximum of one percent.  This type of contribution typically applies to smaller scale residential development such as knock-down/rebuilds and significant alterations and additions as well as non-residential development outside the local centres.  No contribution can be levied on development under $100,000 in value and only half a percent on development between $100,001 and $200,000.  A maximum of one percent applies to development costs in excess of $200,001.

 

Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015 was the first s94A contributions plan adopted in Ku‑ring-gai.  It is mutually exclusive to Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010, levying different development for different infrastructure.  By law, as well as by construction of the plans, no single development consent can be subject to a contribution under both types of contributions plans.

 

Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015

 

The ‘indirect’ percentage levy contributions plan came into effect in March 2016 and has been operating for 18 months.  Infrastructure delivery can be progressive in the sense that works are generally small to medium scale and local, such as neighbourhood centre upgrades, local intersection upgrades and upgraded local & pocket parks and playgrounds.  These works can be planned for in the upcoming financial year based on quantum and general location of receipts.  While strict geographic nexus is not as critical as for the main contributions plan, it is fair and reasonable that works should be prioritised in locations that generally match the source of the contributions.

 

An analysis of income over the past 18 months since the first s94A contributions plan for Ku-ring-gai was adopted has been undertaken which can inform the instigation of works listed in the works programme and the priority locations for that work.

 

Seventeen local suburbs have contributed to local neighbourhood infrastructure to be funded by progressive s94A contributions.  Over the past 18 months, Ku-ring-gai has received $2.4M which would equate to an average of $1.6M/year.  This is significantly higher than the initial estimates when the concept of a future indirect contributions plan for Ku-ring-gai was first presented to Council, which was based on an analysis of applications and complying development certificates over the preceding three years.  It is not yet known if this rate of receipt is sustainable and further analysis will be undertaken to identify trends to inform the review of this plan to be instigated shortly.

 

Interestingly, the highest total s94A contributions come from suburbs that also have some part of their area within a local centre including (in descending order from highest) Turramurra, Pymble, Wahroonga, St Ives, Lindfield, Killara (Gordon and Roseville being the only two local centres without their hinterland in the top 50% of income).  This suggest that residents within the lower density zones outside the higher density rezoned areas are also renewing their housing stock – however there is scope for further analysis on the general source of the development activity.

 

 

Killara and Wahroonga are smaller scale centres located along the Pacific Highway corridor with five of the six core local centres; both have experienced unit growth under Ku-ring-gai LEP 194, now integrated into Ku-ring-gai LEP 2015 whereas the six local centres fall under Ku-ring-gai Local Centres LEP 2012.  Development that provides additional multi-unit housing is levied under Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 regardless of the Local Environmental Plan that authorises it.

 

The highest average individual contributions have come from East Killara and Warrawee – through relatively few applications (12 and 13 respectively) – totalling around $100,000 in income for each suburb.  Nonetheless, the high average contribution does make these neighbourhood centres a higher priority for upgrades.

 

 

Staff are working on a map of s94A Contributions to identify the areas where contributions have been made in order to prioritise the next neighbourhood centre works as well as locations of demand for traffic improvements and upgrades to local parks.

 

Planning Agreement Policy 2016

 

Ku-ring-gai Council Planning Agreement Policy 2016 is not formally due for review until 2019, however the Department of Planning has recently issued new practice notes and a number of other local councils have refined their planning agreement policies as a result.  A recent discussion paper on foreshadowed amendments to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, suggest that Councils may need to formally note their regard for the Practice Notes issued by the Department relating to Planning Agreement best practice.

 

Additionally, Ku-ring-gai has had additional experience of drafting and preparing Planning Agreements since the adoption of the 2016 policy, including the first for land dedication only. 

 

Accordingly, it is timely that the current Planning Agreement Policy review date be brought forward to 2018.

 

Summary and Conclusion

 

This update report has highlighted the preliminary statistical analysis of the first 18 months of operation of Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015.  It foreshadows further review of the Contributions Plan and the prioritisation of the existing local works programme related to the location and quantum of income.

 

It also foreshadows the review of all major contributions documents commencing in 2018.

 

integrated planning and reporting

Theme One: Community, People and Culture

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

C1.1 An equitable and inclusion community that cares and provides for its members.

Our community facilities are accessible and function as cultural hubs to attract a range of users

C6.1.1.1.1-C6.1.1.1.3 New community facilities under design and planned delivery for Lindfield Local Centre and Turramurra Local Centre

C4.1 A community that embraces healthier lifestyle choices and practices

New and enhanced open space and recreation facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment

C4.1.2.1.1; C4.1.2.1.2; and

C4.1.2.1.3

Balcombe Park, Greengate Park, Charles Bean Sportsfield & Community centre, Cameron Park & Lapwing Reserve delivered.  Allan Avenue Park under design & community consultation.

 

Theme Three: Places, Spaces and Infrastructure

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P2.1 A robust planning framework is in place to deliver quality design outcomes and maintain the identity and character of Ku-ring-gai

Strategies, plans and processes are in place to effectively manage the impact of new development

P8.1.1.1.1.1-2

Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan

2010 ensures new development contributes towards the cost of delivering supporting infrastructure.

P4.1 Our centres offer a broad

range of shops and services and contain lively urban village spaces where people can live, work, shop, meet and spend leisure time

Plans to revitalise local centres are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community

P1.1.1.1.2

Lindfield and Turramurra Masterplanning is well-advanced.

P6.1 Recreation, sporting and

leisure facilities are available to meet the communitys diverse and changing needs

A programme is being implemented to improve existing recreation, sporting and leisure facilities and facilitate the establishment of new facilities.

C4.1.2.1.2-3;

Allan Avenue Park in Turramurra is the next park to be in the design and public consultation phase.

P7. Multipurpose community

buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs

Standards are developed to

improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets

C6.1.2.1.2

New community facilities including new library facilities and multi-purpose community facilities will be delivered in Lindfield & Turramurra.

P8.1 An improved standard of infrastructure that meets the community’s service level standards and Council’s obligations as the custodian of our community’s assets

Our public infrastructure and assets are planned, managed and funded to meet community expectations, defined levels of service and address inter-generational equity

C6.1.2.1.2; C4.1.2.1.3

New public infrastructure is planned to support new development and ensure that everyone who lives and works in Ku-ring-gai continues to enjoy access to public facilities.

 

Theme Four: Access, Traffic and Transport

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

T3.1 An accessible public

transport and regional road network that meets the diverse and changing needs of the community

A strategic access, traffic

and transport plan is being implemented for the Northern Sydney Region

C6.1.2.1.1; T 1.1.3.1.1

Commuter car parking integrated into major projects and new link roads.

 

Theme Six: Leadership and Governance

Community Strategic Plan

Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

L1.1 A shared long term vision

for Ku-ring-gai underpins strategic collaboration, policy development and community engagement

Council’s responses to government policy and reforms are guided by and aligned with the adopted Community Strategic Plan 2030 “Our Community – Our

Future”

L1.1.2.1.1 and L1.1.2.1.2

Ku-ring-gai responds to requests for comment by the Department of Planning and the Greater Sydney Commission.

L2.1 Council rigorously manages its financial resources and assets to maximise delivery of services

Council expenditure satisfies the needs of the community and Council has increased its commitment to infrastructure asset management priorities

C6.1.1.1.2

Council is leveraging the value of its assets to combine with contributions to deliver major community assets in Lindfield & Turramurra.

 

Governance Matters

Regular reporting

 

The need to give members of Council and the community more information on the progress and activity in the development contributions systems was identified as part of the Delivery Program and the Operational Plans.  This update report has been provided regularly (twice-yearly) since 2011/12. 

 

Risk Management

A rolling works programme

 

The works programme arising out of Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 through to at least 2031 is a multi-million dollar undertaking.  Infrastructure delivery will be possible only through the receipt of contributions which will be affected by several economic cycles over the life of the contributions plan.  The risks in taking such a strategic horizon are managed through regular reviews of the contributions plan, generally after the release of data from each five-yearly census or, potentially, more frequently, if the pace or scale of development is definitely changed by any statutory process or economic cycle.  The rate and scale of development is monitored by Council staff.  Sydney Water figures for delivered dwelling yield are also referenced.

 

Proposed reforms to the Planning Legislation that governs development contributions

 

It is now accepted that the Planning Reforms which were intended to replace the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act with a new piece of legislation have stagnated since they failed to gain Senate support at the end of 2013 and are no longer likely to be finalised as originally envisaged.

 

There are alternative mechanisms available to the NSW Government for the introduction of some of the reforms affecting development contributions, for example via Ministerial Direction under s94E or via amendments to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation.  Draft changes to the EP&A Regulation have recently been released for comment.

 

Presently the NSW Government is actively engaged in reviewing the governance of many aspects of residential development.  There is also a sub-regional planning process currently being undertaken by the NSW State Government under the Greater Sydney Commission.  Ku-ring-gai is in the North District.  A revised District Plan for the Northern Sydney Region was released in late-October 2017 and is currently being analysed by the Urban Planning Team.

 

Financial Considerations

Council maintains a dynamic Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP).  The works program of Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 was integrated into the LTFP from the start of 2011 and adopted by Council on 3 May 2011.  Since that date, it has been updated and reported to Council annually to ensure its currency.

 

Staff from both the Finance Unit and the Urban Planning & Heritage Unit monitor both income and development growth respectively and liaise to maintain a deliverable works programme. The scheduling of works through to the long term should be considered somewhat fluid depending on strategic opportunities that might arise from time-to-time and the management of cash flows during the economic cycle.

 

In this context, the Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 comprises a large range of works from small-scale parkland embellishments to major community infrastructure.  This range facilitates considerable flexibility in managing a financially deliverable work programme over time, while retaining adequate balances to support the contributions component of the complex delivery of major integrated community facilities and public domain works.  These works include the Lindfield Village Green, the Lindfield Community Hub and the Turramurra Community Hub.

 

Contributions are also being received under Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015.  The receipting for these contributions is also fully integrated into the mainframe Property and Rating system and the financial management systems. 

 

After 18 months of operation, benchmarking leading to a review is being undertaken. The first works to be funded by this Contributions Plan are being incorporated into the Long Term Financial Plan now that there is some indication of cash-flow.

 

Ku-ring-gai Council’s Finance staff continue to refine the cash-flow management of development contributions to support and facilitate the infrastructure delivery programmes over the life of both contributions plans.

 

Social Considerations

The Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area has been going through a period of change that commenced around 2004.  This is bringing about population growth and demographic change following a period of declining and stable population from the 1980s.

 

Infrastructure is essential to support and encourage the integration of the new residents in Ku-ring-gai, both among residents of the new dwellings being built and those moving into larger existing housing vacated by the members of Kuring-gai’s older population who have ‘downsized’ into smaller local accommodation.

 

The provision of additional community infrastructure providing both outdoor and indoor community spaces and improved accessibility will continue to support this process and help Ku‑ring-gai continue to be a vibrant and popular place to live for all ages.

 

Ku-ring-gai Council continues to prioritise the delivery of community infrastructure in areas of high development activity and in accessible locations for the majority of residents as well as local businesses and their employees.

 

The 2016 census was held on Tuesday, 9 August 2016.  There has been significant change in Ku‑ring-gai since the 2011 census with the construction of many more medium-to-high density units and it will be very interesting to see the changes in the Ku-ring-gai population as a whole as a result of the delivery of newer housing types as data begins to be released.  Census data has been released in two main parts in June and October 2017 and analysis of the data will be a key focus of 2018 – supporting the review of a number of strategic planning documents including Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010.

 

Environmental Considerations

Environmental considerations are part of the detailed design of every item of infrastructure provided for in the Contributions Plan.  The provision of this infrastructure is required to support cohesive and sustainable communities in areas of increasing urbanisation.

 

Community Consultation

Extensive community consultation is part of the delivery aspect of all key items of infrastructure including new parks and community facilities. 

 

Early in 2016, Ku-ring-gai revamped the webpages that relate to the development contributions system including highlighting the rolling infrastructure delivery programme.  Major items of infrastructure are highlighted with links to the specific progress pages presented online for community information.

 

Internal Consultation

The management of the development contributions system is a truly whole-of-Council system from policy development, to contributions calculation, through inflation and receipting to infrastructure development.  All aspects of the contributions system are co-ordinated across Council with input from all areas with a direct interest in an aspect of the system on an on-going basis.

 

Summary

This report summarises Ku-ring-gai’s recent achievements in infrastructure delivery and well as highlighting where Ku-ring-gai is heading in the delivery of infrastructure funded, or partly funded, by development contributions across the LGA with particular reference to the local centres where the majority of redevelopment is concentrated.

 

It should be remembered that this is a summary outline report.  Much more extensive technical and financial detail is reported quarterly as part of Council’s Long Term Financial Plan, in Council’s annual budget and delivery programmes and, in the case of major items of infrastructure, such as Lindfield Community Hub, Lindfield Village Green and the Turramurra Community Hub Project and major new parks, these are also subject to separate, more detailed, project reporting on a regular basis.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That the update report on the development contributions system in Ku-ring-gai be received and noted.

B.   That Ku-ring-gai Planning Agreement Policy 2016 be scheduled for review to align with current best practice and recent experience.

C.   The Ku-ring-gai Contributions Plan 2010 and Ku-ring-gai s94A Contributions Plan 2015 be scheduled for rolling review concurrent with aligned strategic planning documents commencing in 2018.

 

 

 

 

Kate Paterson

Infrastructure Co-ordinator

 

 

 

Antony Fabbro

Manager Urban & Heritage Planning

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.6 / 92

 

 

Item GB.6

S04553/13

 

11 October 2017

 

 

Environmental Levy Small Grants Scheme - Round 19

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To seek Council’s endorsement to fund round nineteen (19) of the Environmental Levy’s Community Small Grants Scheme.

 

 

background:

The Community Small Grants Scheme is designed to assist the Ku-ring-gai community to deliver small, community based, environmental projects at a neighbourhood level. An independent small grants assessment panel has been established to undertake the review process.

 

 

comments:

Eighteen (18) applications were received under round nineteen (19) of the Community Small Grants Scheme. Of these, the small grants assessment panel recommends funding fourteen (14) projects, totalling $46,700.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council supports the recommendation of the small grants assessment panel to fund fourteen (14) projects, totalling $46,700, under round nineteen (19) of the Environmental Levy Community Small Grants Scheme.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To seek Council’s endorsement to fund round nineteen (19) of the Environmental Levy’s Community Small Grants Scheme.

 

Background

 

The Community Small Grants Scheme is designed to assist the Ku-ring-gai community to deliver small, community based, environmental projects at a neighbourhood level. The Scheme was identified in the development of the Environmental Levy, with strong support from residents and Councillors, as an opportunity to invest, at the local level, in projects of direct community benefit.

 

As part of the Scheme, a panel has been established to provide a review of grant applications and funding protocols. This panel makes recommendations to Council for the funding of projects, which is the subject of this report. Membership of this panel was sought from local community environmental groups and Council staff.

 

Table 1 outlines the number of projects and funding allocations through the Community Small Grants Scheme to date.

 

Table 1:   Summary of grants funded through the Community Small Grants Scheme to date

 

Round

Number of successful applications

Funding allocation

Round 1

3

$12,500

Round 2

12

$52,249

Round 3

9

$36,982

Round 4

9

$40,000

Round 5

10

$39,576

Round 6

11

$39,720

Round 7

10

$33,102

Round 8

11

$40,636

Round 9

12

$40,069

Round 10

7

$40,343

Round 11

11

$46,174

Round 12

10

$45,276

Round 13

13

$40,068

Round 14

15

$43,357

Round 15

15

$50,278

Round 16

15

$49,902

Round 17

14

$41,779

Round 18

16

$47,654

TOTAL

203

$739,665

 

Comments

 

Round nineteen (19) of the Scheme was promoted through advertisements in local newspapers, the sustainability e-news and advertisements in two (2) Chinese newspapers.

 

Additionally, electronic promotion was conducted through Council’s website and Council’s environmental email distribution lists.

 

A total of eighteen (18) funding requests were received, totalling $62,800.  The budget for round nineteen (19) is $46,700.  Applications were reviewed and rated by each member of the small grants assessment panel.  Please see Attachment A1 for a summary of the assessment panel review.

 

Based on this review, a summary of the recommended projects for funding is provided in Table 2.

 

Table 2:  Summary of successful projects and applicants

 

Project name

Group

Recommended funding

Native plant displays

KMC Bushcare Association

$5,000

Environmental monitoring of bats

Sydney Bats

$3,300

School habitat project

WildThings NSW

$4,700

Bicentennial Park bush regeneration

Nola Jones

$5,000

Quarry Creek bush regeneration

Quarry Creek Bushcare

$4,302

Paddy Pallin regeneration

Paddy Pallin Foundation

$3,000

Hampshire Street bush regeneration

Friends of LCNP

$5,000

Propagation of rare native plants

Garden Shed Association

$5,000

Native bee hive

KU Chase Pre-school

$650

Landscaping at Turramurra Public School

Turramurra North PC P&C

$1,000

Sediment ponds

Lane Cove NPWS

$3,000

Bees and plants

1st Roseville Scouts

$650

Native bees

Thomas Carlyle

$450

Care of injured wildlife

WAIF

$4,950

Total

 

$46,700

 

integrated planning and reporting

 

Natural Environment

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

A community empowered with knowledge, learning and information that benefits the environment

Increased community action that benefits the environment

 

Deliver environmental resources and programs for residents

 

Governance Matters

 

The Community Small Grants Scheme, delivered through the Environmental Levy program, provides annual funding to support environmental projects at a community level.  Community development programs are highlighted in Ku-ring-gai’s Community Strategic Plan as a key area for Council and accordingly the Environmental Levy funds a range of initiatives in this regard.

 

Risk Management

 

The Community Small Grants Scheme covers a range of projects and within each project there are a variety of associated risks. Council ensures reduced risk to the community and the environment by working closely with grant recipients to ensure that work undertaken in bushland is handled by professionals and that contractors are sourced with appropriate training and safety standards.

 

Financial Considerations

 

The Environmental Levy has allocated $46,700 for round nineteen (19) of the Community Small Grants Scheme.

 

Social Considerations

 

The Community Small Grants Scheme provides an opportunity to invest at the local level in projects of direct community benefit. Many of the Scheme’s projects see community members working closely together on a project with an environmental focus. Thus, the Scheme has positive social benefits as well as environmental.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

Round nineteen (19) funding has been allocated to enable activities such as bush regeneration, habitat creation and sustainability projects at local schools and pre-schools. Outstanding applications were received from a number of organisations which will help promote a greater appreciation and understanding of the natural environment within the Ku-ring-gai Local Government Area. 

 

The evaluation criteria for the Community Small Grants Scheme ensure that all projects benefit the natural environment, being:

 

·     a contribution to a sustainable community with an environmental benefit for a significant section of the community;

·     cost effectiveness;

·     a plan of management, demonstrating sound management practices including planning to achieve the proposed objectives;

·     planning towards incorporating financial, social and environmental sustainability; and

·     compliance with relevant legislation and Council policies

 

Community Consultation

 

The panel for round nineteen (19) comprised: the Secretary of WildThings NSW; one (1) Committee member from the Ku-ring-gai Bushcare Association; and three (3) Council staff, two from the Environment and Sustainability Department and the Bushland Operations Co-ordinator. The panel met to review the proposals.

 

Internal Consultation

 

In reviewing the grant applications, Council’s Environmental Volunteer Programs Co-ordinator liaised with the Manager Environment and Sustainability, the Team Leader Natural Areas and other relevant staff, in relation to projects that fell within their areas of professional expertise.

 

Summary

 

This report seeks Council’s support to fund round nineteen (19) of the Environmental Levy’s Community Small Grants Scheme.

 

Eighteen (18) applications were received under round nineteen (19) of the Scheme. The small grants assessment panel recommends funding fourteen (14) projects, totalling $46,700.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.      That Council supports the recommendation of the small grants assessment panel to fund fourteen (14) projects under round nineteen (19) of the Environmental Levy Community Small Grants Scheme, totalling $46,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter Clarke

Community Volunteers Co-ordinator

 

 

 

 

Marnie Kikken

Manager Environment & Sustainability

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Assessors comments for the 2017 small grants projects

 

2017/302597

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.7 / 97

 

 

Item GB.7

S10840

 

26 May 2017

 

 

Lindfield Village Green

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

 purpose of report:

To report to Council on the findings of investigations into the feasibility and impact of increasing underground short-term parking on the Lindfield Village Green (LVG) project.

 

 

background:

To convert an at grade carpark to an underground carpark and a new “Village Green” for Lindfield, a Development Application (DA) for the LVG project was lodged in December 2016.  Development approval was granted on 17 October 20-17 by the Sydney North Planning Panel.

 

At its meeting of 28 February 2017, a Mayoral Minute titled “Lindfield Village Green additional basement level” was unanimously carried.  Council resolved:

 

1.   That staff investigate increasing underground short-term parking spaces while maintaining the proposed commuter spaces, including a thorough cost analysis and funding sources, and report back to Council.

2.   That an analysis of the flow on impact of these parking increases on surrounding streets and local intersections also be undertaken and brought back to council in the same report.

 

 

comments:

Studies of the cost and impact of providing additional short-term parking have been carried out by specialist consultants.  A summary of the findings, discussion of potential funding sources and a recommendation on the way forward is contained within this report.

 

 

recommendation:

That Council progresses with the current (DA approved) design for two levels of basement parking and that a Capital Expenditure Review be prepared for referral to the Office of Local Government .

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To report to Council on the findings of investigations into the feasibility and impact of increasing underground short-term parking on the Lindfield Village Green (LVG) project.

 

Background

The Lindfield Village Green (LVG) project was conceived by the need to provide public open space within the Lindfield Local Centre.  As the cost of buying numerous individual parcels of land in the area to create a large lot were prohibitive, it was considered that the best use of Council’s S94 funds was to convert an existing at grade carpark into an underground carpark with a new village green at street level.  The 2010 contributions plan was specifically worded to facilitate this approach. Following community consultation and a design competition, a winning concept design was chosen by Council at its meeting of 23 June 2015.

 

This concept design was then tested and further developed to become the ‘final concept design’ which Council resolved to support at its meeting of 23 August 2016. This design then became the basis of the current Development Application (DA) which was unanimously approved by the Sydney North Planning Panel on 17 October 2017.

 

At its meeting of 28 February 2017, following the tabling of a Mayoral Minute, Council resolved as follows:

 

1.   That staff investigate increasing underground short-term parking spaces while maintaining the proposed commuter spaces, including a thorough cost analysis and funding sources, and report back to Council.

2.   That an analysis of the flow on impact of these parking increases on surrounding streets and local intersections also be undertaken and brought back to council in the same report.

 

This report responds to the Mayoral Minute.

 

Comments

This report addresses the findings of investigations into the additional cost, impact, and potential funding sources of increased short-term parking as well as establishing the parameters by which an informed decision can be made to progress the project.

 

Car Parking - Existing Situation

 

The primary role of the existing Council-owned, on-grade Council car park is to provide for the short stay needs of the surrounding community and business uses such as St Alban’s Anglican Church on Tryon Road, the heritage shops on Lindfield Avenue, The Colonnade (No 2 Kochia Lane) and the Lindfield Corporate Centre (12-18 Tryon Road). Car parking needs of these can be briefly described as follows:

 

·     Church and other surrounding community facilities (such as the Masonic Hall) generally have times of highest use outside of usual business trading hours (such as evenings or weekends).

·     Lindfield Avenue heritage shops and associated residential flats were built at a time when Council did not require developments to accommodate parking on site.  It is understood that the flat tenancies have parking provisions within their own sites, however as there are no customer parking spaces within their sites there is a parking requirement associated with these shops. However, there are also short-stay parking spaces nearby on Lindfield Avenue, so the additional requirement is limited.

·     The Colonnade (No 2 Kochia Lane) faces the Tryon Road car park and currently has a number of owner occupied and tenanted office spaces with staff parking in its basement. Visitor parking demand for this relatively small building is estimated to be 7 spaces (based on current uses) and is currently provided for in the Tryon Road car park. Should the building be redeveloped, all parking would be required to be situated wholly within its own site boundary.

·     The Lindfield Corporate Centre is an important part of the community as it currently provides for a number of medical and social functions. The building was originally approved as an office building, with secure basement parking and little need for short stay/customer parking. Tenancies within the building have since changed, resulting in substantially higher demand for short stay parking, which is currently being accommodated in the existing at-grade car park and on surrounding streets. The Lindfield Corporate Centre has a large number of basement car parking spaces which are not open to the public and which are not fully utilised, even though public parking spaces are required to be provided in a number of approved DAs for tenancy use. If the Lindfield Corporate Centre were to be redeveloped, the LEP/DCP would ensure that all of its generated parking needs were provided for within its own site boundary. It is arguably unlikely that the Lindfield Corporate Centre would remain in its current configuration as a consequence of the housing strategy work that Council must carry out to satisfy the Greater Sydney Commission.

 

Car Parking - New mixed use developments (Lindfield Avenue)

 

All new development is required to provide its generated parking numbers wholly within their own sites in accordance with the Ku-ring-gai DCP (Local Centres) or State Government requirements. Such is the case for the new mixed used developments on Lindfield Avenue that are immediately to the north of the LVG site. These new developments will house two small supermarkets (expecting IGA and Harris Farm).  Collectively these sites will provide 103 short-stay parking spaces for their patrons. All surrounding residential developments have their own resident plus visitor parking provided for on site.

 

Furthermore, the Ku-ring-gai Town Centres Parking Management (adopted by Council in 2010) recognises that:

 

“Most Council car parks exist due to the surrounding older type strip shops/offices in the town centres generally not being able to provide parking on-site to service their needs and those of their customers. However, as redevelopment of the town centres occurs, new on-site parking would need to be provided to cater for the parking needs of the development. As this on-site provision increases, the role and importance of large at-grade Council car parks would be slowly diminished…

 

…the parking needs of the town centres would be met if redeveloped sites provided for their own parking needs on-site, which could gradually diminish the long term need for Council car park sites. There is therefore scope to reduce the quantity of car parking [as part of the redevelopment of Council car park sites] needed to be undergrounded”

 

 

Vehicle parking numbers in the Village Green Development Approval

 

The existing at grade car-park has 135 short stay spaces. The current approval provides for 80 short stay and 100 long stay car spaces over two levels of basement. The shortfall of 55 short stay car spaces within the site is to be made up on the surrounding streets by converting existing unmarked long stay spaces to timed, short stay spaces.

 

The approved design provides for two levels of basement parking which can accommodate the following number of car parking spaces:

 

 

B1

B2

Total

Short Stay

80

-

80

Commuter (long-stay)

-

100

100

 

 

 

180

 

Figure 1 – Plan view of the two levels of basement parking showing short-term parking in ‘Yellow’ (on B1)

and commuter parking in ‘Pink’ (on B2). Note the ‘panhandle’ area of parking on Level B2 which allows for an additional 20 spaces (80 on B1 and 100 on B2)

 

Studies undertaken by Council indicate that 80 short stay basement parking spaces are appropriate based on a “like-for-like” scenario which considers an overall increase of 45 parking spaces (180 vs 135 existing [spaces]). By creating basement commuter (long stay) parking, some existing on-street long stay parking is to be changed to short stay parking to replace the loss in (basement) short-stay spaces within the Village Green.  It also meets the communities expectations of short stay parking being available at street level.There are currently ample long stay spaces on the surrounding streets that could be converted to provide the balance of the current number of 135 short stay spaces. The Traffic Impact Assessment Report which formed part of the DA documentation identified a possible increase of 65 short term parking spaces within close proximity of the LVG site, along Milray Street and Tryon Road alone. Council also has the ability to monitor and increase or decrease the on-street short stay parking numbers depending on demand/usage i.e. monitor and adapt conditions to manage the balance between demand for short and long stay parking numbers (see section titled Parking management). As part of conditions of development consent, Council must re-signpost on-street car spaces in proximity to the LVG project to provide for short-stay parking (no longer than 2 hours) for a minimum of 41* additional spaces after completion of works.

 

*Subject to approval from the Local Traffic Committee

 

Study to Investigate the Option of a Third Level of Parking

 

By providing a third level of basement car parking, the following parking spaces could approximately be achieved*:

 

 

B1

B2

B3

Total

Short Stay

81

53

-

134

Commuter

-

26

79

105

 

 

 

 

239

 

*Note: The 3 level design is conceptual only so there may be a variance to parking space numbers presented in this report.

 

Figure 2 – Plan view of the three levels of basement parking showing short-term parking in ‘Yellow’

and commuter parking in ‘Pink’. Note the removal of parking in the ‘panhandle’ area (see Figure 1).

 

Figure 3 – Sections through the 3 Level Basement showing the mix of short and long stay parking

(short stay in ‘Yellow’ and long stay in ‘Pink’).

 

Reports undertaken to study the impact of a third level of basement (option B3) include the following:

 

·     3 Level Traffic impact assessment (see Attachment 1);

·     Cost estimate (see Confidential Attachment 2).

 

A review of all comments made by specialist consultants has been undertaken and a summary of the report findings are set out below.

 

Option B3 - Vehicle parking numbers

 

The 3 level design is found to be capable of accommodating/replacing all of the existing short stay spaces (135) plus an additional 100 commuter car spaces - all contained within the current Tryon Road car park site. The 3 level design therefore creates a clear increase in parking numbers as opposed to the ‘like for like’ outcome achieved by the 2 level design where changes to surrounding on-street parking is required to make up numbers for the loss (in basement) of short stay parking spaces.

 

Option B3 - Travel demand

 

By increasing the number of parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a corresponding increase in traffic. See ‘Vehicle circulation and traffic impacts’ below.  Incentivising people to travel short distances by car is outside of Council’s Community Strategic Plan 2030 as set out in the Sustainable Vision Report 2008 - 2033. This can be seen through Council’s support of Sustainable Transport such as the Ku-ring-gai Bike Plan which seeks to encourage increased bicycle use in the LGA. Council also encourages car-pooling and car sharing schemes as is contained in the approved ‘Ku-ring-gai Integrated Transport Strategy’ July (2011).

 

Option B3 - Vehicle circulation and traffic impacts

 

Figure 4 – Vehicle circulation routes remain consistent between the 2 and 3 Level basement design.

Access and egress from the basement car park is via Milray Street (see yellow arrows).

 

There is little variation in the movement of cars beyond the need for a portion of commuter parkers to travel to the third level. At grade traffic movements remain the same for both 2 Level and 3 Level design options.

 

Based on the analysis of traffic intersection modelling (SIDRA), the following conclusions are made:

 

·     the proposed additional basement level will result in a total increase in the number of spaces from 180 to 240 (circa 33% increase); and

·     based on the SIDRA assessment, it can be concluded that all four intersections in the vicinity of the LVG project are expected to continue operating at the same satisfactory ‘Level of Service’ with a 3 level basement as with 2 basement levels.

 

Option B3 - Estimated cost

 

A cost report comparing the 2 Level DA drawings and the proposed 3 Level design* is contained in Confidential Attachment 2. Construction of a third level was found to impact on the structural requirements of all elements on the upper levels (beams, slabs, walls, waterproofing etc.), requiring an increase in size (generally thickness) and therefore the cost of these components along with a deeper, hence more expensive excavation. That is to say, the larger and deeper the structure goes, there is a holistic incremental increase to the structure beyond the simple duplication of one level. In addition, there would be an incremental increase in operational and maintenance costs associated with a larger basement area.

 

*NOTE: The floorplate changes between the 3 level and 2 levels designs.  The 3 level design would have approximately 80 spaces on each level while the 2 level design has 80 on B1 and 100 spaces on B2. The 2 level design has additional parking on B2 extending down the ‘panhandle’ between Kochia lane and the north side of the Lindfield Centre. This extension is required in order to achieve 100 spaces for commuters (TfNSW). The 3 level design is a rectangular cuboid with all 3 levels maintaining the same footprint. 

 

Option B3 - Potential funding sources

 

At the time of writing this report no definitive funding sources had been identified for a third level.

 

Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

 

Council has been in negotiations with TfNSW for some time with an understanding that they would take on the lower basement level (B2) for commuter car parking.  The specific details of the arrangement are yet to be agreed.  However, it is intended that TfNSW compensate Council for the up-front cost of these parking spaces along with the ongoing maintenance costs.  Now that the DA approval has been achieved, Council are well placed to conclude negotiations with TfNSW. 

 

Council has been acting in good faith with TfNSW by including a layer of commuter car parking in the DA (2 level) design, carrying all design and consultation costs to date.  Should negotiations fail, Council would have the option to either modify the DA to remove this layer or to review the funding for the project and keep the second level for short or long stay parking at Council’s cost.  If Council decides to proceed with a third basement level, there is a risk that TfNSW would be unsupportive of paying for the most expensive level (due to each level getting more expensive as excavation goes deeper).

 

It is an unsatisfactory design outcome to have short-stay parking on the lowest level with long-stay on the upper level.  Traditionally, TfNSW’s commuter car parks are above ground (structured) which are less costly than underground car parks.

 

It is proposed to have the funding from TfNSW agreed prior to Council entering into a construction contract.  It is acknowledged that it would be better from Council’s perspective to have this agreement finalised now.  However, there are still too many uncertainties regarding the ultimate construction cost, as well as the ultimate number of spaces to be provided, for Council to make such a commitment at this point in time. 

 

TfNSW are committed to providing 240 commuter car spaces in Lindfield. There is no specific requirement for 100 of these to be on the east (LVG site) and 140 on the west (Lindfield Village Hub [LVH] site) of the Pacific Highway. This split (as opposed to all spaces being on the LVH site) was devised early in the master planning process as it has benefits to the greater road/traffic network.

 

Any agreement with TfNSW will be the subject of a separate report to Council.

Parking management

 

The two (2) level basement design (with 180 spaces) has a net gain, over existing conditions, of 45 car spaces. The recently approved DA does not hold Council to provide 100 commuter spaces (leaving 80 for short stay). Rather, the DA puts the onus on Council to manage the mix of short and long stay spaces and further provides (as a Condition of Consent) thatAny allocation of Long-term or commuter parking shall be limited to between 7am and 7pm Monday to Friday. Such long term parking spaces shall be available for use by others outside these times.’  Therefore Council may decide to increase the number of short stay spaces within the two level design. This would mean that an alternative location would need to be found for any displaced commuter spaces. Further, the allocation of short versus long stay parking could be amended over time.

 

Council is in the privileged position of being able to monitor parking needs on an ongoing basis. This includes being able to adjust the mix of on-street as well as the mix of short stay and commuter spaces in basement (assuming this sort of flexibility could be negotiated with TfNSW).

 

Paid parking

 

In 2015 Council staff commissioned a discussion paper on paid parking (see Attachment 3). The discussion paper revealed that further investigation and discussion of the implementation of paid parking in Ku-ring-gai is warranted because it would:

 

·     increase parking turnover, particularly in local centre areas where demand often exceeds supply, thereby increasing the availability of parking spaces; and

·     generate revenue that could be used to fund local centre improvements or transport-related facilities.

 

It is considered that in the longer term Council will need to implement some form of electronic parking management and paid parking for the LVG.  This will de-incentivise over use of this car park by people seeking to use the car park for longer periods than those offered by the new developments (Aqualand and the Markets) that are due to open early 2018.

 

If Council’s car spaces are not at least equal to the short stay parking offered at the new developments, it will become the preferred place to park. Circling the streets looking for cheaper places to park also creates extra strain on the road network. It is unknown at this time what the parking charges of the supermarkets car parks will be.

 

If Council decides to further pursue paid parking, more detailed investigations regarding the extent of the system, pricing structure, staging etc. would be required. An extensive consultation phase would also need to occur before the introduction of paid parking. This matter is addressed in the recommendations of this report

 

OPTIONS

 

Next steps should Council wish to proceed with the DA approved 2 level design

 

A few possible outcomes are as follows:

 

·     Council pursues the project in its current form with the same or an amended mix of short and long stay parking. Documentation for tender of construction could commence with building starting late in 2018 and completing in 2019 (calendar years), subject to funding negotiations with TfNSW..

 

·     Council has the opportunity to change the number of commuter spaces on the second level. For example, the overall mix of 80 short and 100 long stay could be changed to 100 short and 80 long stay spaces. Council could then commence negotiations in earnest with TfNSW for funding. As part of the DA conditions of consent, Council must create a minimum of 41 on-street short-stay parking spaces after completion of works. This on-street provision in addition to 100 short stay spaces in basement would create 141 short stay spaces which is in excess of the existing 135 spaces.

 

Next steps should Council wish to proceed with a third level

 

If Council resolves to provide an additional basement level the Project team would then have the following options:

 

·     Amend the current DA documentation and then apply for a variation through ‘Section 96’. This would add time to completion of the project due to the documentation and assessment period. Negotiation with TfNSW could not conclude without development consent (which may not be granted for a revised design). A revised costing would also be required at completion of documentation of the revised design (the attached costing report is based on ‘concept’ drawings only).

 

·     Alternative funding source cannot be found and no acceptable design outcome is possible. The result would be that Council is forced to look for an alternative open space site and may explore alternative development options for the Tryon Road car park to help fund the design and construction of a new site.

 

integrated planning and reporting

Places, Spaces and Infrastructure – P4 Revitalisation of our centre

Community, People and Culture – C4 Healthy lifestyles

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

A range of well planned, clean and safe neighbourhoods and public spaces designed with a strong sense of identity and place.

P4. 1.1

Plans to revitalise local centre are being progressively implemented and achieve quality design outcomes in collaboration with key agencies, landholders and the community

 

Implement a place management approach for the local centre improvements to co-ordinate works and achieve quality outcomes.

 

.P4. 1.4

An improvement plan for Lindfield centre is being progressively implemented in collaboration with owners, businesses and state agencies

 

Engage with relevant stakeholders to establish timing, extent and partnership opportunities.

Undertake due diligence and undertake project scope.

Identify and engage with the key stakeholders. 

A healthy, safe and diverse community that respects our history and celebrates our differences in a vibrant culture of learning.

C4. 1.2 

New and enhanced open space and recreational facilities have been delivered to increase community use and enjoyment.

 

Undertake acquisitions for new parks.

Undertake assessment and identify locations for new parks.

Complete the design for identified parks and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities.

Construct parks at identified locations and include design principles which facilitate passive recreation activities.

 

Governance Matters

This project has been reported extensively to Council with a total of thirteen (13) reports to Council since 2013. The reports have addressed a broad range of matters including open space planning, project definition, project scope and budget, tenders, community engagement and concept plans and compulsory acquisition. The reports are as follows:

 

1.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 28 February 2017 – Mayoral Minute - Lindfield Village Green additional basement level

2.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 23 August 2016 - GB.5 - Lindfield Village Green – Final Concept Design

3.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 May 2016 - GB.5 - Lindfield Village Green - Design Services - Request for Tender No. 07-2016

4.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 November 2015 - GB.9 – Lindfield Local Centre – Commuter Car Parking

5.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 23 June 2015 - GB.5 – Lindfield Village Green Preferred Concept Design

6.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 21 April 2015 - GB.5 – Compulsory Acquisition of Roads

7.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 31 March 2015 - GB.7 - Update Report on the Development Contributions System

8.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 28 October 2014 - GB.10 – Lindfield Village Green – Selection of Preferred Tenderers T17/2014

9.   Ordinary Meeting of Council 9 September 2014 - GB.5 – Lindfield Village Green – Confirmation of Preliminary Scope of Works, Project Budget and Program

10. Ordinary Meeting of Council 7 October 2014 - GB.8 - Update Report on the Development Contributions System

11. Ordinary Meeting of Council 4 April 2014 - GB.11 - Update Report on the Development Contributions System

12. Ordinary Meeting of Council 10 December 2013 - GB.19 - Lindfield Village Green - Tryon Road - Project Update

13. Ordinary Meeting of Council 13 August 2013 - GB.6 - Update Report on the Development Contributions System

 

A Capital Expenditure Review is also required.  This report recommends the initiating of this review. A final investment decision by Council would not be made until the Capex Review is complete, been reviewed by the OLG, and considered by Council

 

Risk Management

Council has actively managed the key risks identified to date.  Risks are summarised as follows:

 

Risk 1 – Council provides too little or too much parking

 

Over provision of parking spaces

 

There are a number of elements that contribute to the risk of over-providing parking spaces. These include:

 

·     redevelopment of the buildings that currently rely on visitor parking in Councils carpark (being that any new development is required to provide all generated parking wholly within its own site);

·     public perception that an increase in parking numbers will worsen on-street traffic conditions;

·     that Council is seen to favour one business area over another by providing parking for businesses in privately owned buildings which should have parking spaces within the buildings to service these businesses;

·     that Council are seen to be encouraging cars when funds may be better spent encouraging alternative means of transport such as by proving cycle ways; and

·     that future modes of transport such as car sharing, autonomous vehicles, and point to point public transport systems relieve the need and existing pressure on car parks all together.

 

Under provision of parking spaces

 

The traffic report which supports the approved DA (with 2 levels of basement parking) states that there is ample opportunity to provide additional short-stay parking on the surrounding streets by replacing existing long-stay (unrestricted) parking with timed (short-stay) parking. Further, Council has the opportunity to adjust the mix of short and commuter (long stay) spaces within the 2 level basement design.

 

Council is able to monitor the situation ongoing and manipulate the supply of short-stay parking by changing on-street and basement parking restrictions to suit demand.

 

It is therefore deemed less of a risk to proceed with the amount of parking provided in 2 levels than to provide a third level of basement parking.

 

Risk 2 - The final design exceeds the budget

 

Cost of the proposed work is being actively managed to ensure it stays within the project budget.

The DA design is considered to represent the best value for money against Council’s project budget and the least risk. The cost estimate for the ‘3 basement level design’ is included as Confidential Attachment A2. All elements (beams, slabs, walls, waterproofing etc.) increase in size (generally thickness) and therefore cost, incrementally the deeper the excavation.

 

From the time of the project’s inception, Council has envisaged allocating funds based on one level of short-term parking only. If Council wish to provide additional short-stay parking (on 2 or 3 levels), an additional source of funding will need to be approved. There is, however, less cost implication (and therefore less risk of not being able to find additional funds) by increasing short term parking within the 2 level design than by mandating a 3rd level.

 

Risk 3 – Extended development assessment period may lead to an increase in the cost of

 construction

 

The DA for 2 levels of basement took 10 months from lodgement to determination.  If Council wish to deviate from the current approved DA and proceed with a 3rd level of basement, there will be an impact on timing to achieve development consent and therefore commencement of construction. The price of construction is escalating continuously due to unprecedented infrastructure works (like NorthConnex/WestConnex/Sydney Metro) as well as significant ongoing levels of private (residential) development.

 

Risk 4 – A S96 for a third level may be refused on the basis of traffic generation

 

Traffic modelling concluded that all four intersections in the vicinity of the LVG project are expected to continue operating at the same satisfactory ‘Level of Service’ with 3 basement levels as with 2 basement levels.  However, given that the greater road network is already operating at a critical level, there is also a risk that a design that provides more parking (and therefore more traffic) would not be approved or would result in deterioration of traffic conditions and undermine the traffic management measures being developed for the Lindfield local centre.

 

Risk 5 – Council reputation if the project is not delivered

 

Council’s reputation is not at risk from its decision to proceed with 2 or 3 levels as either decision will be unpopular with some of the public. Rather, there is a reputational risk if the project is not delivered.

 

Risk 6 – Ongoing negotiations with Transport for NSW (TfNSW) may delay award of the ‘Contract for construction’

 

Negotiations with TfNSW on the terms and conditions of a funding agreement are yet to be finalised. However, it is intended that TfNSW compensate Council for the up-front cost of commuter parking spaces along with the ongoing maintenance costs i.e. on a cost neutral basis.  Council has been acting in good faith with TfNSW by including a layer of commuter car parking in the DA (2 level) design at Council’s own cost.  Should negotiations fail, Council would have the option to either modify the DA to remove this layer or to review the funding for the project and keep the second level for short or long stay parking at Council’s cost.

 

If Council decides to proceed with a third basement level, there is a risk that TfNSW would be unsupportive of paying additional costs (due to the additional level impacting the cost of all levels) and the project would suffer considerable delays having to pursue a redesign.

 

It is acknowledged that it would be better from Council’s perspective to have this agreement finalised now.  However, detailed design of the basement needs to be resolved before commencing negotiations with TfNSW to minimise Council’s exposure to financial risk and erroneous assumptions. There are simply still too many uncertainties regarding the ultimate construction cost for Council to make a commitment at this point in time. 

 

Any agreement with TfNSW will be the subject of a separate report to Council.

 

Financial Considerations

This project is identified in Council’s Long Term Financial Plan and listed in Council’s Revised Delivery Program 2013 – 2017. The Operational Plan 2017 – 2018 identifies funds in the Capital Works Program & Operational Projects 2015/2016, 2016/2017, 2017/2018, 2018/19 and 2019/2020.  Funding is generally from S94 contributions.

 

Currently the project budget is some $27M.  It includes all contingencies, professional fees, staff time and other costs, but does not cover Operational costs over the life of the project, nor does it cover the cost of a third level.  This budget is indexed and with time it will be marginally different at the time of reporting the tender for construction to Council. 

 

Should TfNSW not contribute towards the project, additional funding (both capital and operational) will need to be secured or the design modified accordingly.

 

Social Considerations

The provision of additional community infrastructure, providing both outdoor and indoor community spaces will ensure that Lindfield Village Green becomes a vibrant and popular place to live and recreate for all ages.

 

Environmental Considerations

The addition of a third level of car parking arguably encourages people to drive to Lindfield instead of utilising other forms of transport such as buses, bicycles or walking.  While the conversion of the existing carpark into a ‘green’ open space has obvious environmental benefits, there are no other environmental issues arising from an additional level of basement. All environmental impacts have been considered as part of the DA and are included within the approved documentation. 

 

Community Consultation

Community engagement and consultation is an integral component of the ‘Activate Lindfield’ initiative and Lindfield Village Green project delivery. Multiple engagement activities have been undertaken since project inception in February 2014.

 

Recent engagement about the DA has indicated that a large number of the community feel that Council should provide additional underground car parking spaces. Perceived increased demand due to residential densification as well as new retail developments soon to be opened in the vicinity have given rise to concern over the shortfall between underground short-term parking spaces when compared to the existing conditions.

 

There has however, also been concern raised over the impact of changes to the existing traffic conditions of which any additional basement parking would exacerbate.

 

Internal Consultation

Workshops with Council staff from Strategy and Environment, Operations, Development and Regulation, and Community Departments have been ongoing since inception of the project. The addition of a third basement level has not been part of the workshop discussions but is not considered to represent a major variation in terms of design. Rather, should it be decided to construct the third level, the major impact will be the increase in construction costs and the additional ongoing maintenance costs associated with the assets.

 

Summary

In August 2016 Council resolved to adopt a ‘final concept’ design for the Lindfield Village Green which was validation and refinement of the winning competition design. From the time of the project’s inception in 2014, Council has allocated funds based on one level (only) of short-term parking.

 

A funding source for a third level of parking and operational costs of additional short stay parking on the 2 level design has, up until the time of writing this report, not been identified. There is, however, considerably less cost implication by increasing short term parking within the 2 level design when compared to mandating a 3rd level. There is also a time delay associated with revising the design and submitting a S96 application to gain development approval (not guaranteed) that may further increase costs. 

 

Considering the risks as outlined in this report, is it recommended that Council continues with the development of two levels of underground parking. Documentation of the DA approved (2 level basement) design could commence with construction starting later in 2018 and completion in 2019 (calendar years). However, considering that as part of the DA conditions of consent, Council must provide 41 (minimum) on-street short stay spaces, it is further recommended the mix of short and long stay parking numbers in basement be changed from 80 short stay and 100 long stay, to 100 short stay and 80 long stay (commuter) spaces. This would see a total provision of 141 short stay spaces which is in excess of the existing 135 spaces.

 

With finalisation of the parking numbers and construction costs, Council can pursue capital and operational funding of the long stay parking with TfNSW.

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council commences detailed design of the DA approved two (2) basement level design to produce tender documentation for construction.

 

B.   That Council amends the (basement) mix of short and long stay parking numbers to 100 short stay and 80 long stay (commuter) spaces.

 

C.   That a further report be brought back to Council within four months outlining negotiations with TfNSW and funding arrangements.

 

D.   That a Capital Expenditure Review be submitted to the NSW Division of Local Government.

 

E.      That Council endorses the investigation of paid parking as a funding mechanism and parking management solution across all the town centre projects.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dean Payne

Project Manager - Major Projects

 

 

 

 

Bill Royal

Team Leader Urban Design

 

 

 

 

Ian Dreghorn

Manager Strategic Projects

 

 

 

 

Andrew Watson

Director Strategy & Environment

 

 

Attachments:

A1

3 Level Traffic Impact Assessment

 

2017/312633

 

A2

Cost estimate Level 3 basement design

 

Confidential

 

A3

Paid Parking Discussion Paper

 

2017/312134

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.8 / 113

 

 

Item GB.8

RFT14-2017

 

23 October 2017

 

 

Bicentennial Park Amenities Upgrades Tender - RFT14-2017

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing brick and metal roof amenity at Bicentennial Park including the compliance upgrade of the existing disability toilet, and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

 

background:

Ku-ring-gai Council is proposing to upgrade the existing amenity which is located in Bicentennial Park, Pymble adjacent to Ku-ring-gai Fitness & Aquatic Centre. The existing amenities will be upgraded along with a fully compliant disability toilet, baby change facilities, security doors and energy efficient lighting. Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 and closed on 19 September 2017.

 

 

comments:

In total six (6) submissions received. The submissions were assessed using published criteria which identified the best value to Council.

 

 

recommendation:

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the recommendation as detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing brick and metal roof amenity at Bicentennial Park including the compliance upgrade of the existing disability toilet, and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Background

Council approved funding for the upgrade of Bicentennial Park Amenities as part of the 2016/2017 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS), Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan, and was carried forward to 2017/18.

 

The existing amenities were constructed in the early to mid-seventies and as such are significantly affected by ageing and elements deterioration. The existing metal roof and internal fit-outs have reached their end of life cycle and require immediate replacement with water ingress affecting the structural integrity of the internal building fabric.

 

The existing amenities are located within the Bicentennial Park district and in close proximity to the newly constructed Ku-ring-gai Aquatic Centre. The playground area known as Golden Grove is adjacent to the amenities and also planned for a major upgrade.

 

The current and future upgrades to the district park will see a significant increase in public attendance which has subsequently created a need for Council to provide upgraded amenities to cater for the additional demand and accessibility needs.

 

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017, with a closing date of 19 September 2017.

 

Comments

Six (6) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy.

Tenders were received from the following companies:

 

·     Camporeale Holdings Pty Ltd

·     Cunneen Group Pty Ltd

·     Design Interiors

·     Kellyville Building Pty Ltd

·     Lidoran Group

·     Westbury Constructions Pty Ltd

 

It should be noted the order above does not correspond to the order of the list of tenderers named from ‘A’ to ‘F’ in Attachment 1.

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations Building Services Department assessed all tender submissions for conformity and then for the best value for money for Council as per the published selection criteria.

 

Confidential attachments to this report include:

 

·     Tender Assessment and Recommendation Report - Attachment 1

·     Additional Financial Statement - Attachment 2

·     Independent Performance & Financial Assessment - Attachment 3

integrated planning and reporting

Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs. Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets.

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P7.1 Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs.

Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets.

A prioritised program of improvements to community meeting rooms, halls, buildings and facilities is being implemented.

 

Governance Matters

Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 with a closing date of 19 September 2017.  At the close of tender, six (6) tenders were received. All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s Tendering Policy.

 

Council’s Manager Procurement and Contracts was in attendance for the TEC meetings to ensure the evaluation was conducted in accordance with the signed Evaluation Plan.

 

Confidential attachments to this report include the list of tenders received, the Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation and the independent Performance and Financial Assessment carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd.

 

The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(iii) of The Local Government Act 1993  as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.

 

Risk Management

Three (3) key areas of risk were identified in relation to the proposed work:

 

·     That work needed to be carried out by a suitably qualified company with experience in projects of similar scale.

·     Availability – the company was available to commence work as stipulated by Council and has the resources to complete the work within 14 weeks or less, subject to weather delays and delays by external organisations outside their control.

·     That Council should not be exposed to financial risk -  as part of the evaluation process tenderers were assessed on providing all information and costs requested within the tender document and an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out on the preferred tenderer to ensure they were trading responsibly and had the financial capacity to undertake the work as detailed within the tender documents.

 

Financial Considerations

This project is currently listed in Council’s 2017/2018 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS), Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan.

 

Social Considerations

The existing amenities are located within the Bicentennial Park district and in close proximity to the newly constructed Ku-ring-gai Aquatic Centre. The playground area known as Golden Grove is adjacent to the amenities and also planned for a major upgrade.

 

The current and future upgrades to the district park will see a significant increase in public attendance which has subsequently created a need for Council to provide upgraded amenities which to cater for the additional demand and accessibility needs.

 

The proposed upgrade of the present facilities is in line with Council’s 2017/2018 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS), Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan to have the community embrace heathier lifestyle choices and practices; and to provide quality community and recreational facilities to meet the needs of our changing community.

 

Environmental Considerations

A Potential Impact Assessment (PIA) was not required as the upgrades have no consequential impact on the environment.

 

An Environmental Management Plan will be in place during all construction works.

 

Community Consultation

Prior to the commencement of on-site works, permanent hirers, local residents, and visitors will be advised of the commencement of works and be provided with a time estimate for the completion of the works. 

 

The site will be closed for use during the construction period and signage identifying the construction timeframe will be available on site. Temporary toilets will be provided during the construction works.

 

Internal Consultation

Operations staff have consulted with staff from Strategy and Environment Departments for the proposed upgrade of the amenities.

 

Summary

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 and closed on 19 September 2017.

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel was formed consisting of representatives from Operations Building Services Department. At the close of tender six (6) tenders were received and all were recorded in accordance with Council’s Tendering Policy.

 

Following the evaluation and independent performance and financial check, it is recommended that Council accept the recommendation detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

 

Recommendation:

A.   That Council accept the recommendation detailed in Part A in the confidential Attachment 1, for the upgrade of the amenities within Bicentennial Park, Pymble, adjacent to Ku-ring-gai Fitness & Aquatic Centre.

 

B.   That the Tender documents be referred to Council’s solicitor to assist in preparing contract documents that are in Council’s best interest

 

C.   That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documentation on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.

 

D.   That the Seal of Council be affixed to the contract documents.

 

E.   That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Heathcote

Engineering Services

 

 

 

 

Ian Taylor

Acting Director Operations

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Tender Assessment and Recommendation

 

Confidential

 

A2

Additional Financial Statement

 

Confidential

 

A3

Independent Performance and Financial Assessment

 

Confidential

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.9 / 118

 

 

Item GB.9

RFT15-2017

 

31 October 2017

 

 

Howson Oval Amenities Upgrades - Tender - RFT15-2017

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing brick and concrete roof amenities at Howson Oval and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

 

background:

Ku-ring-gai Council is proposing to upgrade the existing amenity which is located adjacent to Howson Oval Turramurra. The existing amenities were constructed in the early to mid-seventies. They are significantly deteriorated by the ageing process and the elements. Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 and closed on 19 September 2017.

 

 

comments:

In total six (6) submissions received. The submissions were assessed using published criteria which identified the best value to Council.

 

 

recommendation:

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the recommendation as detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing brick and concrete roof amenities at Howson Oval and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Background

Council approved funding for the upgrade of Howson Oval Amenities as part of the 2016/2017 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS), Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan, and was carried forward to 2017/18.

 

The existing amenities were constructed in the early to mid-seventies. They are significantly deteriorated by the ageing process and the elements. The membrane on the existing concrete roof has reached its end of life cycle and requires immediate upgrade with water ingress affecting the structural integrity of the internal building fabric and fixtures.

 

The internal fixing and PC items are dated and require replacement with more user friendly and energy efficient components. The isolation of the amenities has also raised security and safety concerns which are planned to be addressed by providing additional lighting, and the installation of heavy duty security entry doors.

 

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017, with a closing date of 19 September 2017.

 

Comments

Six (6) tenders were received from the following companies:

 

·      Camporeale Holdings Pty Ltd

·      Cunneen Group Pty Ltd

·      Design Interiors

·      Kellyville Building Pty Ltd

·      Lidoran Group

·      Westbury Constructions Pty Ltd

 

It should be noted the order above does not correspond to the order of the list of tenderers named from ‘A’ to ‘F’ in Attachment 1.

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations Building Services Department assessed all tender submissions for conformity and then for the best value for money for Council as per the published selection criteria.

 

Confidential attachments to this report include:

 

·      Tender Assessment and Recommendation Report - Attachment 1

·      Additional Financial Statement - Attachment 2

·      Independent Performance & Financial Assessment - Attachment 3

 

 

integrated planning and reporting

Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs. Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets.

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P7.1 Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs.

Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets.

A prioritised program of improvements to community meeting rooms, halls, buildings and facilities is being implemented.

 

Governance Matters

Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 with a closing date of 19 September 2017.  At the close of tender, six (6) tenders were received. All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s Tendering Policy.

 

Council’s Manager Procurement and Contracts was in attendance for the TEC meetings to ensure the evaluation was conducted in accordance with the signed Evaluation Plan.

 

Confidential attachments to this report include the list of tenders received, the Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation and the Independent Performance and Financial Assessment carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd.

 

The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(iii) of The Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.

 

Risk Management

Three (3) key areas of risk were identified in relation to the proposed work:

 

·     That work needed to be carried out by a suitably qualified company with experience in projects of similar scale.

·     Availability – the company was available to commence work as stipulated by Council and has the resources to complete the work within 14 weeks or less, subject to weather delays and delays by external organisations outside their control.

·     That Council should not be exposed to financial risk. As part of the evaluation process tenderers were assessed on providing all information and costs requested within the tender document and an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out on the preferred tenderer to ensure they were trading responsibly and had the financial capacity to undertake the work as detailed within the tender documents.

 

Financial Considerations

This project is currently listed in Council’s 2017/2018 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS), Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan.

 

Social Considerations

The existing amenities are located within the Howson Oval district which has recently undergone major upgrades to its playing field.

 

The upgrades to the district park have seen a significant increase in public attendance which has subsequently created a need for Council to provide upgraded amenities to cater for the additional demand.

 

The proposed upgrade of the present facilities is in line with Council’s 2017/2018 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS),  Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan to have the community embrace healthier lifestyle choices and practices; and to provide quality community and recreational facilities to meet the needs of our changing community.

 

Environmental Considerations

A potential Impact Assessment (PIA) was not required as the upgrades have no consequential impact on the environment.

 

An Environmental Management Plan will be in place during all construction works.

 

Community Consultation

Prior to the commencement of on-site works, permanent hirers, local residents, and visitors will be advised of the commencement of works and be provided with a time estimate for the completion of the works.

 

The site will be closed for use during the construction period and signage identifying the construction timeframe will be available on site. Temporary toilets will be provided during the construction works.

 

Internal Consultation

Operations Staff have consulted with staff in Strategy & Environment Department for the proposed upgrade of the amenities.

 

Summary

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22nd August 2017 and closed on 19th September 2017.

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel was formed consisting of representatives from Operations Building Services Department. At the close of tender six (6) tenders were received and all were recorded in accordance with Council’s Tendering Policy.

 

Following the evaluation and independent performance and financial checks, it is recommended that Council accept the recommendation detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council accept the recommendation detailed in Part A in the confidential Attachment 1, for the upgrade of Howson oval amenities at Turramurra.

 

B.   That the Tender documents be referred to Council’s solicitor to assist in preparing contract documents that are in Council’s best interest

 

C.   That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documentation on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.

 

D.   That the Seal of Council be affixed to the contract documents

 

E.   That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Heathcote

Engineering Services

 

 

 

 

Ian Taylor

Acting Director Operations

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Assessment and Recommendation Report

 

Confidential

 

A2

Additional Financial Statement

 

Confidential

 

A3

Independent Performance and Financial Assessment

 

Confidential

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

GB.10 / 123

 

 

Item GB.10

RFT16-2017

 

31 October 2017

 

 

Koola Park Amenities Upgrades Tender - RFT16-2017

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

purpose of report:

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing amenities at Koola Park and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

 

background:

Ku-ring-gai Council is proposing to upgrade the existing amenity which is located adjacent to Koola Park, East Killara. The existing amenities were constructed in the early to mid-seventies. They are significantly deteriorated from the ageing process and elements. Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 and closed on 19 September 2017.

 

 

comments:

In total six (6) submissions received. The submissions were assessed using published criteria which identified the best value to Council.

 

 

recommendation:

In accordance with Section 55 of the Local Government Act and Tender Regulations, it is recommended Council accept the recommendation as detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

 


 

Purpose of Report

To consider the tenders received for the upgrading of the existing amenities at Koola Park and appoint the preferred tenderer.

 

Background

Council approved funding for the upgrade of Koola Park amenities as part of the 2016/2017 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS), Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan, and was carried forward to 2017/18.

 

The existing amenities were constructed in the early to mid-seventies. They are significantly deteriorated by ageing process and the elements. The membrane on the existing concrete roof has reached the end of its life cycle and requires immediate upgrade with water ingress affecting the structural integrity of the internal building fabric and fixtures.

 

The internal fixing and PC items are dated and require replacement with more user friendly and energy efficient components. The isolation of the amenities has also raised security and safety concerns which are planned to be addressed by providing additional lighting and the installation of heavy duty security entry doors.

 

The existing amenities are located adjacent to Koola Park which has recently undergone major upgrades to the playing fields and walking track. The upgrades to the park have provided a significant increase in public attendance. This has created a necessity for upgraded amenities.

 

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017, with a closing date of 19 September 2017.

 

Comments

Six (6) tenders were received and recorded in accordance with Council’s tendering policy. Tenders were received from the following companies:

 

·     Camporeale Holdings Pty Ltd

·     Cunneen Group Pty Ltd

·     Design Interiors

·     Kellyville Building Pty Ltd

·     Lidoran Group

·     Westbury Constructions Pty Ltd

 

It should be noted the order above does not correspond to the order of the list of tenderers named from ‘A’ to ‘F’ in Attachment 1.

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel consisting of staff from the Operations Building Services Department assessed all tender submissions for conformity and then for the best value for money for Council as per the published selection criteria. 

 

Confidential attachments to this report include:

 

·     Tender Assessment and Recommendation Report – Attachment 1

·     Additional Financial Statement – Attachment 2

·     Independent Performance & Financial Assessment – Attachment 3

integrated planning and reporting

Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs. Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets.

 

Community Strategic Plan Long Term Objective

Delivery Program

Term Achievement

Operational Plan

Task

P7.1 Multipurpose community buildings and facilities are available to meet the community’s diverse and changing needs

Standards are developed to improve the condition and functionality of existing and new assets.

A prioritised program of improvements to community meeting rooms, halls, buildings and facilities is being implemented.

 

Governance Matters

Tender documents were prepared and released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 with a closing date of 19 September 2017.  At the close of tender, six (6) tenders were received. All submissions were recorded in accordance with Council’s Tendering Policy.

 

Council’s Manager Procurement and Contracts was in attendance for the TEC meetings to ensure the evaluation was conducted in accordance with the signed Evaluation Plan.

 

Confidential attachments to this report include the list of tenders received, the Tender Evaluation Panel’s comments and recommendation and the independent Performance and Financial Assessment carried out by Corporate Scorecard Pty Ltd.

 

The attachments are considered to be confidential in accordance with Section 10A (2)(d)(iii) of The Local Government Act 1993 as they are considered to contain commercial in confidence information.

 

Risk Management

Three (3) key areas of risk were identified in relation to the proposed work:

 

·     That work needed to be carried out by a suitably qualified company with experience in projects of similar scale.

·     Availability – the company was available to commence work as stipulated by Council and has the resources to complete the work within 14 weeks or less, subject to weather delays and delays by external organisations outside their control.

·     That Council should not be exposed to financial risk - as part of the evaluation process tenderers were assessed on providing all information and costs requested within the tender document and an independent Performance and Financial Assessment was carried out on the preferred tenderer to ensure they were trading responsibly and had the financial capacity to undertake the work as detailed within the tender documents.

 

Financial Considerations

This project is currently listed in Council’s 2017/2018 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS), Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan.

Social Considerations

The existing amenities are located adjacent to Koola Park which has recently undergone major upgrades to the playing fields and walking track.

 

The upgrades to the park have provided a significant increase in public attendance. This has created a necessity for upgraded amenities.

 

The proposed upgrade of the present facilities is in line with Council’s 2017/2018 Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS),  Public Toilets Upgrade Program and Operational Plan to have the community embrace healthier lifestyle choices and practices; and to provide quality community and recreational facilities to meet the needs of our changing community

 

Environmental Considerations

A Potential Impact Assessment (PIA) was not required as the upgrades have no consequential impact on the environment.

 

An Environmental Management Plan will be in place during all construction works.

 

Community Consultation

Prior to the commencement of on-site works, permanent hirers, local residents, and visitors will be advised of the commencement of works and be provided with a time estimate for the completion of the works. 

 

The site will be closed for use during the construction period and signage identifying the construction timeframe will be available on site. Temporary toilets will be provided during the construction works.

 

Internal Consultation

Operations staff have consulted with staff from Strategy & Environment Department for the proposed upgrade of the amenities.

 

Summary

Tender documents were released through Tenderlink on 22 August 2017 and closed on 19 September 2017.

 

A Tender Evaluation Panel was formed consisting of representatives from Operations Building Services Department. At the close of tender six (6) tenders were received. All tenders were recorded in accordance with Council’s Tendering Policy.

 

Following the evaluation and independent performance and financial check, it is recommended that Council accept the recommendation detailed in the confidential Attachment 1.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendation:

 

A.   That Council accept the recommendation detailed in Part A in the confidential Attachment 1, for the upgrade of existing amenities adjacent to Koola Park, Koola Avenue, East Killara, 2071.

 

B.   That the Tender documents be referred to Council’s solicitor to assist in preparing contract documents that are in Council’s best interest.

 

C.   That the Mayor and General Manager be delegated authority to execute all tender documents on Council’s behalf in relation to the contract.

 

D.   That the Seal of Council be affixed to all necessary documents.

 

E.   That all tenderers be advised of Council’s decision in accordance with Clause 178 of the Local Government Tendering Regulation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Heathcote

Engineering Services

 

 

 

 

Ian Taylor

Acting Director Operations

 

 

Attachments:

A1

Tender Assessment and Recommendation Report

 

Confidential

 

A2

Additional Financial Statement

 

Confidential

 

A3

Independent Performance and Financial Assessment

 

Confidential

   


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

NM.1 / 128

 

 

Item NM.1

S10973-6

 

9 October 2017

 

 

Notice of Motion

 

 

Project Committees

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Kelly dated 9 October 2017

 

In the normal course of business in any given year, Council has the carriage of scores of millions of dollars of business in a variety of forms.  At the moment, there are a number of projects under consideration, such as:

 

a.       Marian Street Theatre

b.       Lindfield Village Hub

c.       Bushlands Road development

d.       The Bunnings “3M” site

 

Just to name a few.

 

In the same way that we manage other Council business via committees, I suspect Council, the community and the developers/sponsors would benefit from a dedicated team overseeing all aspects of these projects, providing a single point of contact and acting as a conduit for all parties to ensure projects stay on track and provide valuable transparency.  In addition, they provide a valuable experiential opportunity for both Councillors and Council staff to interact with external stakeholders.

 

I suggest that a committee be formed for each major project, starting with the Lindfield Village Hub project and said committee membership be published to the external stakeholders.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Peter Kelly

Councillor

 

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

NM.2 / 129

 

 

Item NM.2

S11591

 

31 October 2017

 

 

Notice of Motion

 

 

Australia Day Celebrations and Citizenship Ceremonies

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Pettett dated 31 October 2017

 

We have seen some interstate councils abandoning Australia Day celebrations and citizenships ceremonies on Australia Day.

 

Ku-ring-Gai council holds its largest citizenship ceremony each year on Australia Day.  This is a day of celebration of being and becoming an Australian.  It is the day when people from all walks of life come together and celebrate what it is to be Australian. As Australians we recognise the past, respect the present and look forward to the future.

 

I move that Council continues to support the Australia Day citizenship ceremonies and the Council supported events held on Australia Day.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Jeff Pettett

Councillor for Comenarra Ward

 

 

 

  


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

NM.3 / 130

 

 

Item NM.3

S08531

 

2 November 2017

 

 

Notice of Rescission

 

 

New park at Allan Avenue Turramurra

 

Notice of Rescission from Councillors Pettett, Szatow, Smith and Greenfield dated
2 November 2017

 

We, the undersigned councillors, move that the following decision from GB7 of the meeting of
24 October be rescinded.

 

That Council endorses the final concept design for the new park at Allan Avenue, Turramurra;

 

A.   That staff proceed with design development and the preparation of construction documentation including detailed plans, cost estimates and specifications for public tender;

B.   That Council authorises the General Manager to allow minor changes to the concept plan during the design development process where budget or other constraints warrant amendments;

C.   That any increased maintenance costs associated with the new park at Allan Avenue be included in the draft 2018/19 recurrent budget;

D.   That Council endorses the name “Boyds Orchard Park” for the new Park at Allan Avenue, Turramurra;

E.   That the name “Boyds Orchard Park” be submitted to the Geographical Names Board to commence the gazettal process;

F.   That should the name “Boyds Orchard Park” be rejected by the Geographical Names Board that a further report be brought back to Council regarding the proposed name of the park.

 

If the Rescission Motion is successful then we move that:

 

A.   A site inspection be arranged

B.   A detailed design briefing for councillors to be arranged allowing councillor input  before the final design concept and naming of the new park at Allan Avenue Turramurra agenda item is brought back to council

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Rescission as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

Councillor Jeff Pettett

Councillor for Comenarra Ward

 

 

Councillor Cheryl Szatow

Councillor for Gordon Ward

 

 

 

Councillor Martin Smith

Councillor for St Ives Ward

 

 

 

Councillor Donna Greenfield

Councillor for Wahroonga Ward

   


 

Ordinary Meeting of Council - 14 November 2017

NM.4 / 132

 

 

Item NM.4

S09042

 

6 November 2017

 

 

Notice of Motion

 

 

Amendment to Plan of Management for the Canoon Road Recreation Area

 

Notice of Motion from Councillor Clarke dated 6 November 2017

 

Ku-ring-gai Netball Association (KNA) is recognised as a leading netball association on the North Shore, comprising 18 clubs and 3600+ members from the Ku-ring-gai area. Currently KNA holds Saturday competition at the Canoon Road Recreational Area, which has served them for the past 40 years. However, current membership numbers mean that the Plan of Management now in place will not adequately serve the association and its members going into the future. Even now traffic is chaotic during winter season in South Turramurra with residents knowing to avoid the area least they get stuck in traffic. By allowing for limited training and games to be held under lights other days of the week, traffic congestion can be alleviated on Saturdays. Furthermore, there is currently a dramatic shortage of training facilities across the Ku-ring-gai area, with some girls having to train on private tennis courts in people’s backyards due to a lack of lit training facilities. This Plan of Management change shown below will help address this shortfall.

 

Action Plan 39, the Canoon Road Recreation Area Plan of Management currently states:

Investigate operating some fixtures and training sessions under lights on Thursday and/or Friday evenings possibly between 5pm and 7.30pm, which would enable times between Saturday fixtures to be maximised allowing for more efficient movement of pedestrians and traffic in the surrounding streets.

 

To accommodate the current and future needs of netball in Ku-ring-gai, it is recommended that the wording in Action Plan 39 be deleted and replaced.

 

I therefore move:

 

A.   That the following changes be made to the Canoon Road Recreation Area Plan of Management:

 

Operating under lights:

·     For training on Mondays Tuesdays and Wednesdays on up to 9 courts (courts 1 – 4, 20, 22 – 25) between 4.30pm – 8.00pm for the winter season

·     For competition games or training on Thursday on up to 9 courts (courts 1 – 4, 20, 22 – 25) between 4.30pm – 8.00pm for the winter season

(This is a key action and high priority in the PoM to reduce usage on Saturdays - the Under 9 age group will be moved from Saturdays to Thursdays)

 

No fixtures or training under lights on Fridays

 

B.   That the amended Plan of Management be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days, and a report come back to Council following the exhibition period.

 

 

Recommendation:

 

That the above Notice of Motion as printed be adopted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Councillor Callum Clarke

Councillor for Comenarra Ward